MEN56

Are neo-nazis a real issue, why is the Zelensky Jewish government aligned with them, what is Putin intending to do about it, if anything, and what should be done to achieve a real lasting piece? This is a matter touched on in a couple Grayzone vids over the last week, by Scott Ritter and Jacques Baud, but inadequately as always. The real answer would be for Putin to harden his takeover of the four, five or six oblasts in the south/east, and then to offer a deal - return these to Ukraine in exchange for the creation of a new state made up of the seven oblasts in the far west, the heart of anti-Russian feeling in Ukraine, perhaps most importantly including its diaspora. The "new Ukraine" east of that would have to be declared neutral, which likely wouldn't be a major issue given the political makeup of that state, but the new western state could do what it wants. It won't happen, of course, but the real answer lies with warmongers in the west, in more ways than one...

Stumbling upon a new theory on 9/11 has given me a chance to review the history and influence of the neoconservatives, impossibly important in US foreign and war policy in this century.

Stumbling upon a new theory on 9/11 has given me a chance to review the history and influence of the neoconservatives, impossibly important in US foreign and war policy in this century.

Ryan Dawson, that is, and as a followup on recent videos I take a quick look at a Dawson conversation with Scott Horton from 2020 when they stumble into the Jewish question related to Phil Giraldi, and that leads into a discussion Dawson had with Scott Ritter last summer framed around Ukraine. The matter here is how people who are JQ-aware manage conversations with those who are not, and how they may even bury their awareness because of financial concerns. I view Dawson as someone who has been kind of slippery for a long time, who doesn't really have the courage of his convictions, and perhaps increasingly so. He is also someone with limited JQ-awareness - he absolutely sees it regarding foreign policy and neoconservatism, at least regarding 9/11 and ME wars (my jury is still out on Ukraine), he absolutely does not regarding economics, neoliberalism and free-market capitalism (Austrian and Chicago Schools), and he's a half-and-halfer on cultural Marxism, all in on that regarding racism and homophobia but seemingly not regarding immigration and feminism. He also very much identifies on the right side of the spectrum, and generally takes an "us vs. them" viewpoint. So what can you really trust?

Ryan Dawson, that is, and as a followup on recent videos I take a quick look at a Dawson conversation with Scott Horton from 2020 when they stumble into the Jewish question related to Phil Giraldi, and that leads into a discussion Dawson had with Scott Ritter last summer framed around Ukraine. The matter here is how people who are JQ-aware manage conversations with those who are not, and how they may even bury their awareness because of financial concerns. I view Dawson as someone who has been kind of slippery for a long time, who doesn't really have the courage of his convictions, and perhaps increasingly so. He is also someone with limited JQ-awareness - he absolutely sees it regarding foreign policy and neoconservatism, at least regarding 9/11 and ME wars (my jury is still out on Ukraine), he absolutely does not regarding economics, neoliberalism and free-market capitalism (Austrian and Chicago Schools), and he's a half-and-halfer on cultural Marxism, all in on that regarding racism and homophobia but seemingly not regarding immigration and feminism. He also very much identifies on the right side of the spectrum, and generally takes an "us vs. them" viewpoint. So what can you really trust?

Ryan Dawson, that is, and as a followup on recent videos I take a quick look at a Dawson conversation with Scott Horton from 2020 when they stumble into the Jewish question related to Phil Giraldi, and that leads into a discussion Dawson had with Scott Ritter last summer framed around Ukraine. The matter here is how people who are JQ-aware manage conversations with those who are not, and how they may even bury their awareness because of financial concerns. I view Dawson as someone who has been kind of slippery for a long time, who doesn't really have the courage of his convictions, and perhaps increasingly so. He is also someone with limited JQ-awareness - he absolutely sees it regarding foreign policy and neoconservatism, at least regarding 9/11 and ME wars (my jury is still out on Ukraine), he absolutely does not regarding economics, neoliberalism and free-market capitalism (Austrian and Chicago Schools), and he's a half-and-halfer on cultural Marxism, all in on that regarding racism and homophobia but seemingly not regarding immigration and feminism. He also very much identifies on the right side of the spectrum, and generally takes an "us vs. them" viewpoint. So what can you really trust?

Ryan Dawson, that is, and as a followup on recent videos I take a quick look at a Dawson conversation with Scott Horton from 2020 when they stumble into the Jewish question related to Phil Giraldi, and that leads into a discussion Dawson had with Scott Ritter last summer framed around Ukraine. The matter here is how people who are JQ-aware manage conversations with those who are not, and how they may even bury their awareness because of financial concerns. I view Dawson as someone who has been kind of slippery for a long time, who doesn't really have the courage of his convictions, and perhaps increasingly so. He is also someone with limited JQ-awareness - he absolutely sees it regarding foreign policy and neoconservatism, at least regarding 9/11 and ME wars (my jury is still out on Ukraine), he absolutely does not regarding economics, neoliberalism and free-market capitalism (Austrian and Chicago Schools), and he's a half-and-halfer on cultural Marxism, all in on that regarding racism and homophobia but seemingly not regarding immigration and feminism. He also very much identifies on the right side of the spectrum, and generally takes an "us vs. them" viewpoint. So what can you really trust? Conclusions to follow...

Ryan Dawson, that is, and as a followup on recent videos I take a quick look at a Dawson conversation with Scott Horton from 2020 when they stumble into the Jewish question related to Phil Giraldi, and that leads into a discussion Dawson had with Scott Ritter last summer framed around Ukraine. The matter here is how people who are JQ-aware manage conversations with those who are not, and how they may even bury their awareness because of financial concerns. I view Dawson as someone who has been kind of slippery for a long time, who doesn't really have the courage of his convictions, and perhaps increasingly so. He is also someone with limited JQ-awareness - he absolutely sees it regarding foreign policy and neoconservatism, at least regarding 9/11 and ME wars (my jury is still out on Ukraine), he absolutely does not regarding economics, neoliberalism and free-market capitalism (Austrian and Chicago Schools), and he's a half-and-halfer on cultural Marxism, all in on that regarding racism and homophobia but seemingly not regarding immigration and feminism. He also very much identifies on the right side of the spectrum, and generally takes an "us vs. them" viewpoint. So what can you really trust?

...like a progressive, unfortunately. Which perhaps explains the "libertarian-progressive alliance" that plagues the pursuit of truth today in the alternative media space. Basically that comes down to this: "I can't and/or won't tell you the truth, and maybe because I can't/won't figure it out myself, so I'm going to tell you a bunch of BS that's not the truth but also isn't the BS that the mainstream media is telling you. And a glass that's half full is better than empty, right?" Wrong...

...like a progressive, unfortunately. Which perhaps explains the "libertarian-progressive alliance" that plagues the pursuit of truth today in the alternative media space. Basically that comes down to this: "I can't and/or won't tell you the truth, and maybe because I can't/won't figure it out myself, so I'm going to tell you a bunch of BS that's not the truth but also isn't the BS that the mainstream media is telling you. And a glass that's half full is better than empty, right?" Wrong...

Neo-libertarian Kim Iversen uses a Tulsi tweet on the war against Islamistismists as the basis for a discussion on two decades of middle east warmongering post-9/11, and again establishing her chops as a right-wing pseudo-radical convert. Huh.

This was the week that the war has finally turned! Or just another week where it didn't. In any case, an update on the massive success - or failure - of the "Ukraine" military. And what's actually important here, which is why this is happening, what the real goals are, and how that will effect the future of this guaranteed-long war. Unlike the details of military engagements, this is actually something we can figure out. Well, some of us anyway... Btw, I added another article to my blog that mostly addresses what created and underlies this war, which is the mountain of Jewish money that has underwritten the Democratic Party and one of the impacts of that, and perhaps the most perplexing one, the embrace of neoliberalism: https://men56.substack.com/p/the-money-in-politics-question

...on the real source of the mountain of money that floats the Democratic Party, and instead propagandizes on evil corporate Democrats and their gutless allies, progressive politicians. Which begs the question, why aren't progressives like Dore also viewed as gutless and worthless, that because they would NEVER address the real "evil" behind the party across the board? Instead it's all about Bernie's Med4All and making the American taxpayers foot the bill for middle-class kids' BAs in history and sociology. As Jimmy's co-mocker says here, "it's the job"... The part of the Times of Israel article on progressive Rep. Marie Newman I didn't get to at the end says this: "The promise allegedly came in 2018, after Newman failed to unseat Dan Lipinski, a conservative Democrat, in a primary challenge. Newman, who is backed by a political action committee affiliated with J Street, the liberal Jewish Middle East policy group, ousted Lipinski in 2020." So apparently the issue is that she's sold out to the "progressive" arm of the Jewish-Israeli lobby and not AIPAC, the establishment arm. Christ almighty... Btw, I added another article to my blog over the weekend, about Gates vs Soros as the all-seeing eye, or more broadly the Jewish Question vs Pandemicism as the defining narrative on the extremes today: https://men56.substack.com/p/the-ghost-of-david-rockefeller

...by the mainstream alternative progressive independent-dependent media, that is, in this case Jimmy Dore and Kim Iversen. As much as they try to pretty up the swine of misdirection, it still comes off as Judaized pigshit. Here's the link to my MIC blog: https://men56.substack.com/p/m-i-c-k-e-y-m-o-u-s-e Btw, in the video Iversen includes a bit on the German foreign minister's same "fuck my constituents, we're backing the Jew in Ukraine" comments, but of course has no explanation, rather spins off on a bit about some game show in the UK that rewards someone with payment of four months of utility bills. Worthless...

Max Blumenthal that is, and in a brief moment of forgetfulness and confusion he mentions both of the big Russian Jewish powerplays of the 20th century, the Bolshevik creation of the USSR a century ago and the Harvard Boys creation of the Russian Jewish oligarchy in the 1990s. And he does so in an attempt to disparage a leading Canadian political figure for her family's obviously antisemitic interest in the Jewish role in events in Russia... 🙄

Jeffrey Sachs, that is, and here I get into his appearance on Ashkenocracy Now last week, as also addressed from other angles in a blog on my substack: https://men56.substack.com/p/why-should-we-listen-to-jeffrey-sachs I ran out of time to conclude on the Blumenthal-Halper Biden-mocking piece at the end, and so here are a few points: - Max refers to the centrist Dems as "the pro-Wall St., pro-war state party", and of course what that refers to is the Dem's embrace of neolibleral economics and neoconservative foreign policy in the 1990s under the sellout Clinton. Jewish political philosophies driven by Jewish money, but he'll never say that. - He says, "the Bernie Movement understands the real threats" (unlike the MAGA Trumptards he disparages), which "related to class and inequalty" (Marxist concepts), but if they did it would have never been the Bernie movement, because they would know the threats are Jewish and a Jew would never lead real opposition to that. - He makes the standard comparison to McCarthyism, but who were communists Max defends here? Principally Jews, who were the backbone of radical leftism in the first half of the 20th century, made clear in two books I have covered in detail, Radosh's Commies and Ackerman's Trotsky in New York 1917, both written by Jews. These are two examples of Jews talking about various forms of Jewish socio-political power and control today, without ever using the word, spinning history and reality to divide and confuse. In other words, situation normal - all fucked up.

Today we have Max and Aaron Jew-cleansing on Grayzone, blaming the goy Matt Duss for Bernie's blood-based Russia hatred and the claim that "the establishment" would have overrun weak old President Bernie's innate goodness using charges of... antisemitism?? Then Kim invites on some poor man's Roger Stone charlatan GOP/Big Oil operative type to hawk his book on covid, Schwab and the WEF, and to help sell her own transition into Clownworld and anti-NewWorldOrderism. But what was interesting to me in what he said was his list of the leftish which he now accepts with open arms - which I will address in part 2. Here's a link to my substack letter: https://men56.substack.com/p/an-open-letter-to-kim-iversen-neo

Today we have Max and Aaron Jew-cleansing on Grayzone, blaming the goy Matt Duss for Bernie's blood-based Russia hatred and the claim that "the establishment" would have overrun weak old President Bernie's innate goodness using charges of... antisemitism?? Then Kim invites on some poor man's Roger Stone charlatan GOP/Big Oil operative type to hawk his book on covid, Schwab and the WEF, and to help sell her own transition into Clownworld and anti-NewWorldOrderism. But what was interesting to me in what he said was his list of the leftish which he now accepts with open arms - which I will address in part 2.

I started with former leftists James Corbett, Kim Iverson and Robert Kennedy Jr., who are all making hay on an ethnically-cleansed rightwing alternative reality, with a little progressive alt-reality thrown in just for humor, that coming from Kyle "What, Me Worry?" Kulinski. This series evolves into a more serious discussion of the core problem of the neo-right and more broadly the dissident right, starting the transition to E. Michael Jones which will ultimately get to the faith of Holocaustism and ultimately the paradigm of antisemitism. This continues looking at Jones' own failure (coaxed on by Barrett) to fully analyze the Jewish operative when that comes into conflict with the dominant (and distracting) narrative of the dissident right today - yes, covid and the vaccines. In the second of today's installments I look more closely at Jeffrey Sachs as "Jewish convert" related to Ukraine - is any Jewish operative ever really converted if he/she fails to name the ethnicity behind the movement(s) he/she is now (kind of) criticizing? Is a self-identified activist Jew like a CIA agent - once CIA, always CIA? The best you can say about Sachs is that he has recognized that neocon projects like Syria and Ukraine have already paid their dividends - turning Assad's Syria into a failed state and isolating Putin's Russia as an outlaw state - and so continuing pushing these matters just runs the risk of an "antisemitic" reaction at home.

I start with former leftists James Corbett, Kim Iverson and Robert Kennedy Jr., who are all making hay on an ethnically-cleansed rightwing alternative reality, with a little progressive alt-reality thrown in just for humor, that coming from Kyle "What, Me Worry?" Kulinski. This series will evolve into a more serious discussion of the core problem of the neo-right or more broadly the dissident right when I get to E. Michael Jones, the faith of Holocaustism and ultimately the paradigm of antisemitism.

I started with former leftists James Corbett, Kim Iverson and Robert Kennedy Jr., who are all making hay on an ethnically-cleansed rightwing alternative reality, with a little progressive alt-reality thrown in just for humor, that coming from Kyle "What, Me Worry?" Kulinski. This series evolves into a more serious discussion of the core problem of the neo-right and more broadly the dissident right, starting the transition to E. Michael Jones which will ultimately get to the faith of Holocaustism and ultimately the paradigm of antisemitism. This continues looking at Jones' own failure (coaxed on by Barrett) to fully analyze the Jewish operative when that comes into conflict with the dominant (and distracting) narrative of the dissident right today - yes, covid and the vaccines. In the second of today's installments I look more closely at Jeffrey Sachs as "Jewish convert" related to Ukraine - is any Jewish operative ever really converted if he/she fails to name the ethnicity behind the movement(s) he/she is now (kind of) criticizing? Is a self-identified activist Jew like a CIA agent - once CIA, always CIA? The best you can say about Sachs is that he has recognized that neocon projects like Syria and Ukraine have already paid their dividends - turning Assad's Syria into a failed state and isolating Putin's Russia as an outlaw state - and so continuing pushing these matters just runs the risk of an "antisemitic" reaction at home.

I started with former leftists James Corbett, Kim Iverson and Robert Kennedy Jr., who are all making hay on an ethnically-cleansed rightwing alternative reality, with a little progressive alt-reality thrown in just for humor, that coming from Kyle "What, Me Worry?" Kulinski. Now this series evolves into a more serious discussion of the core problem of the neo-right and more broadly the dissident right, starting the transition to E. Michael Jones which will ultimately get to the faith of Holocaustism and ultimately the paradigm of antisemitism. But I start with the Jones on right's failure to address the Jewish Question, and then his own failure to fully do so when that comes into conflict with the dominant (and distracting) narrative of the dissident right today - yes, covid and the vaccines...

I started with former leftists James Corbett, Kim Iverson and Robert Kennedy Jr., who are all making hay on an ethnically-cleansed rightwing alternative reality, with a little progressive alt-reality thrown in just for humor, that coming from Kyle "What, Me Worry?" Kulinski. Now this series evolves into a more serious discussion of the core problem of the neo-right and more broadly the dissident right, starting the transition to E. Michael Jones which will ultimately get to the faith of Holocaustism and ultimately the paradigm of antisemitism. But I start with the Jones on right's failure to address the Jewish Question, and then his own failure to fully do so when that comes into conflict with the dominant (and distracting) narrative of the dissident right today - yes, covid and the vaccines.

I start with former leftists James Corbett, Kim Iverson and Robert Kennedy Jr., who are all making hay on an ethnically-cleansed rightwing alternative reality, with a little progressive alt-reality thrown in just for humor, that coming from Kyle "What, Me Worry?" Kulinski. This series will evolve into a more serious discussion of the core problem of the neo-right or more broadly the dissident right when I get to E. Michael Jones, the faith of Holocaustism and ultimately the paradigm of antisemitism.

I start with former leftists James Corbett, Kim Iverson and Robert Kennedy Jr., who are all making hay on an ethnically-cleansed rightwing alternative reality, with a little progressive alt-reality thrown in just for humor, that coming from Kyle "What, Me Worry?" Kulinski. This series will evolve into a more serious discussion of the core problem of the neo-right or more broadly the dissident right when I get to E. Michael Jones, the faith of Holocaustism and ultimately the paradigm of antisemitism.