MEN56

In the third and final section of this look at the backward-looking view of eugenics a century ago comes from lawyer/journalist Adam Cohen on Ashkenocracy Now discussing his then-new book Imbeciles which focused on the Carrie Buck SCOTUS ruling in 1927. In this we again see the attack on the WASP elite and the Nazi connection, but also get into a new topic, the 1924 immigration act, which opens up a whole can o' worms...

In the third and final section of this look at the backward-looking view of eugenics a century ago comes from lawyer/journalist Adam Cohen on Ashkenocracy Now discussing his then-new book Imbeciles which focused on the Carrie Buck SCOTUS ruling in 1927. In this we again see the attack on the WASP elite and the Nazi connection, but also get into a new topic, the 1924 immigration act, which opens up a whole can o' worms...

Continuing with James Corbett, from his 2017 doc on why the Rockefellers conquered the world, eugenics being one of the three reasons, of course. In the last three parts I start with some freaks, a bit more from the mainstream doc film on eugenics called A Dangerous Idea, the rest of Corbett's radically anti-establishment take (🤭) and some largely-wiki-sourced information on the important players in this. In the end I am not convinced at all that the Rockefellers were the driving force behind the eugenics movement, and that claim seems to be the only alternative aspect of this piece. Next up is Amy Goodman, Adam Cohen, Ashkenocracy Now and a Jewish view, which I think is critically important in understanding the current definition of eugenics looking back from the age of cultural Marxism and Holocaustism. This is a part of the 20th century culture wars, and the winners are writing the history.

Next up to climb into the barrel is James Corbett, from his 2017 doc on why the Rockefellers conquered the world, imposing eugenics being one of the three reasons, of course. But before I get to that I give you a bit from a mainstream doc film on eugenics called A Dangerous Idea: Eugenics, Genetics and the American Dream, to give one a baseline with which to compare Corbett's radically anti-establishment take on this socio-scientific colossal faux pas of a century ago...

Next up to climb into the barrel is James Corbett, from his 2017 doc on why the Rockefellers conquered the world, imposing eugenics being one of the three reasons, of course. But before I get to that I give you a bit from a mainstream doc film on eugenics called A Dangerous Idea: Eugenics, Genetics and the American Dream, to give one a baseline with which to compare Corbett's radically anti-establishment take on this socio-scientific colossal faux pas of a century ago...

Continuing with James Corbett, from his 2017 doc on why the Rockefellers conquered the world, eugenics being one of the three reasons, of course. In the last three parts I start with some freaks, a bit more from the mainstream doc film on eugenics called A Dangerous Idea, the rest of Corbett's radically anti-establishment take (🤭) and some largely-wiki-sourced information on the important players in this. In the end I am not convinced at all that the Rockefellers were the driving force behind the eugenics movement, and that claim seems to be the only alternative aspect of this piece. Next up is Amy Goodman, Adam Cohen, Ashkenocracy Now and a Jewish view, which I think is critically important in understanding the current definition of eugenics looking back from the age of cultural Marxism and Holocaustism. This is a part of the 20th century culture wars, and the winners are writing the history.

Continuing with James Corbett, from his 2017 doc on why the Rockefellers conquered the world, eugenics being one of the three reasons, of course. In the last three parts I start with some freaks, a bit more from the mainstream doc film on eugenics called A Dangerous Idea, the rest of Corbett's radically anti-establishment take (🤭) and some largely-wiki-sourced information on the important players in this. In the end I am not convinced at all that the Rockefellers were the driving force behind the eugenics movement, and that claim seems to be the only alternative aspect of this piece. Next up is Amy Goodman, Adam Cohen, Ashkenocracy Now and a Jewish view, which I think is critically important in understanding the current definition of eugenics looking back from the age of cultural Marxism and Holocaustism. This is a part of the 20th century culture wars, and the winners are writing the history.

In the third and final section of this look at the backward-looking view of eugenics a century ago comes from lawyer/journalist Adam Cohen on Ashkenocracy Now discussing his then-new book Imbeciles which focused on the Carrie Buck SCOTUS ruling in 1927. In this we again see the attack on the WASP elite and the Nazi connection, but also get into a new topic, the 1924 immigration act, which opens up a whole can o' worms...

Today I start tackling the topic of eugenics, but from the view of how it's been spun as part of a promoted narrative, by three people - RFK Jr., James Corbett and Amy Goodman. There are clear connections between their work - including how critical of all of them I am 😁 - but their treatment differs in some interesting ways. Again as always the overall story is about truth and the lack thereof.

Today I start tackling the topic of eugenics, but from the view of how it's been spun as part of a promoted narrative, by three people - RFK Jr., James Corbett and Amy Goodman. There are clear connections between their work - including how critical of all of them I am 😁 - but their treatment differs in some interesting ways. Again as always the overall story is about truth and the lack thereof.

Today I start tackling the topic of eugenics, but from the view of how it's been spun as part of a promoted narrative, by three people - RFK Jr., James Corbett and Amy Goodman. There are clear connections between their work - including how critical of all of them I am 😁 - but their treatment differs in some interesting ways. Again as always the overall story is about truth and the lack thereof.

In an effort to break free of the "Corbett/Kennedy Nexus" I say goodbye to that subject in the first part, addressing Robert Welch and the Birch Society legacy in the Jewish eyes of the New Republic, and then in the second cover a couple random topics from Max Blumenthal (the neconcoservative/cultural Marxist nexus) and E. Michael Jones (the rise of Holocaustism as a weaponization).

In an effort to break free of the "Corbett/Kennedy Nexus" I say goodbye to that subject in the first part, addressing Robert Welch and the Birch Society legacy in the Jewish eyes of the New Republic, and then in the second cover a couple random topics from Max Blumenthal (the neconcoservative/cultural Marxist nexus) and E. Michael Jones (the rise of Holocaustism as a weaponization).

In these videos I continue with the GZ discussion between Max Blumenthal and Chris Mott on his "whitepaper" The Woke Emperium, which tried to explain the confluence of neoconservatism and social justice warfare without ever talking about Jews (well, Max does mention Steinem, Wolfowitz and Soros at some point). But for anyone who is truly woke on the JQ it's pretty much an obvious failure.

In these videos I continue with the GZ discussion between Max Blumenthal and Chris Mott on his "whitepaper" The Woke Emperium, which tried to explain the confluence of neoconservatism and social justice warfare without ever talking about Jews (well, Max does mention Steinem, Wolfowitz and Soros at some point). But for anyone who is truly woke on the JQ it's pretty much an obvious failure.

To my surprise I have more on this tale, and this relates to the roots of what Kennedy is pushing in his book. The first part is on the common embrace by Junior and James Corbett of an analogy linking Fauci with fellow dictator J. Edgar Hoover, the second part talks about the link between banned cures Ivermectin/Hydroxychloroquine, the AIDS buyer's clubs and Laetrile, and then gets into a familiar history going back all the way to the dark days of Koch's Postulates, and finally the subject that shall not be uttered - polio. And in the middle somewhere I take a sidetrip into pro-homo Hollywood propaganda, which ironically parallels the Kennedy AIDS line.

To my surprise I have more on this tale, and this relates to the roots of what Kennedy is pushing in his book. The first part is on the common embrace by Junior and James Corbett of an analogy linking Fauci with fellow dictator J. Edgar Hoover, the second part talks about the link between banned cures Ivermectin/Hydroxychloroquine, the AIDS buyer's clubs and Laetrile, and then gets into a familiar history going back all the way to the dark days of Koch's Postulates, and finally the subject that shall not be uttered - polio. And in the middle somewhere I take a sidetrip into pro-homo Hollywood propaganda, which ironically parallels the Kennedy AIDS line.

To my surprise I have more on this tale, and this relates to the roots of what Kennedy is pushing in his book. The first part is on the common embrace by Junior and James Corbett of an analogy linking Fauci with fellow dictator J. Edgar Hoover, the second part talks about the link between banned cures Ivermectin/Hydroxychloroquine, the AIDS buyer's clubs and Laetrile, and then gets into a familiar history going back all the way to the dark days of Koch's Postulates, and finally the subject that shall not be uttered - polio. And in the middle somewhere I take a sidetrip into pro-homo Hollywood propaganda, which ironically parallels the Kennedy AIDS line.

At this point I have gone deep enough into this book to draw conclusions on what this is, who is producing it, what the tactics and goals are, and who is being targeted. I am going to do another video on ATZ and the history of dubious cures, but that may be the last thing I cover related to this POS book. As my own qualifier or disclaimer, I don't believe the specific story that Kennedy is spinning here, and for good reasons, in part the demonstrable deception and lies that litter the work. But I am not a mainstreamer on this subject either, But I am not a mainstreamer on this subject either (and you don't have to be a nutter not to be a mainstreamer), I do believe that the medical-industrial establishment and its regulators are a serious problem, and that this involves regulatory capture, and I don't like Fauci at all, I wish Trump had fired that little fucker. However, I think the source of so many of these problems ties back to the adopting of neoliberal economics four decades ago and the pursuit of profits, the worship of money, which that has elevated. Part of that is the litigousness aspect of America as well, and the role of lawyers and courts, which I covered some at one point. Which gets me back to Kennedy the chief counsel for CHD and his no-holds-barred prosecution of Fauci in this book. I don't think this book is going to get us any closer to a serious appraisal of all the problems that are evident in what happened during the pandemic - on both sides of the Great Trumpian Divide.

At this point I have gone deep enough into this book to draw conclusions on what this is, who is producing it, what the tactics and goals are, and who is being targeted. I am going to do another video on ATZ and the history of dubious cures, but that may be the last thing I cover related to this POS book. As my own qualifier or disclaimer, I don't believe the specific story that Kennedy is spinning here, and for good reasons, in part the demonstrable deception and lies that litter the work. But I am not a mainstreamer on this subject either (and you don't have to be a nutter not to be a mainstreamer), I do believe that the medical-industrial establishment and its regulators are a serious problem, and that this involves regulatory capture, and I don't like Fauci at all, I wish Trump had fired that little fucker. However, I think the source of so many of these problems ties back to the adopting of neoliberal economics four decades ago and the pursuit of profits, the worship of money, which that has elevated. Part of that is the litigousness aspect of America as well, and the role of lawyers and courts, which I covered some at one point. Which gets me back to Kennedy the chief counsel for CHD and his no-holds-barred prosecution of Fauci in this book. I don't think this book is going to get us any closer to a serious appraisal of all the problems that are evident in what happened during the pandemic - on both sides of the Great Trumpian Divide.

Next up is chapter 5 of Junior's book on the connection between HIV and AIDS, which I get into in detail. There general theme of this chapter is a contest between the faces of the poles of this debate, Peter Deusberg, who has claimed for decades that HIV doesn't cause AIDS, and Robert Gallo, who was the first to declare in the mid-80s that newly-discovered HIV is the cause of AIDS. There's no question at all that Kennedy comes down on the Deusberg side here, but it is other aspects of this chapter that I found most interesting.

Next up is chapter 5 of Junior's book on the connection between HIV and AIDS, which I get into in detail. There general theme of this chapter is a contest between the faces of the poles of this debate, Peter Deusberg, who has claimed for decades that HIV doesn't cause AIDS, and Robert Gallo, who was the first to declare in the mid-80s that newly-discovered HIV is the cause of AIDS. There's no question at all that Kennedy comes down on the Deusberg side here, but it is other aspects of this chapter that I found most interesting.

Next up is chapter 5 of Junior's book on the connection between HIV and AIDS, which I get into in detail. There general theme of this chapter is a contest between the faces of the poles of this debate, Peter Deusberg, who has claimed for decades that HIV doesn't cause AIDS, and Robert Gallo, who was the first to declare in the mid-80s that newly-discovered HIV is the cause of AIDS. There's no question at all that Kennedy comes down on the Deusberg side here, but it is other aspects of this chapter that I found most interesting.

Next up is chapter 5 of Junior's book on the connection between HIV and AIDS, which I get into in detail. There general theme of this chapter is a contest between the faces of the poles of this debate, Peter Deusberg, who has claimed for decades that HIV doesn't cause AIDS, and Robert Gallo, who was the first to declare in the mid-80s that newly-discovered HIV is the cause of AIDS. There's no question at all that Kennedy comes down on the Deusberg side here, but it is other aspects of this chapter that I found most interesting...

No, I wasn't yet done with Corbett! In part 7 I "follow the money", and then in parts 8 and 9 I summarize and conclude this summary and conclusion - including the use of hockeystick graphs, just for all you philoCorbytes out there!