MEN56

In the last 24 hours the story surrounding the Twitter Files has progressed from where it was in my videos of yesterday, and so I follow along here with some analysis of Taibbi's latest podcast and his appearance on Kim Iversen's show. Again, the dominant narrative being pushed is all about government influence and overreach, but is that the real story? A familiar name comes up, suggesting as always the real matter is the deep state, and more specifically the ruling faction of that over the last 30 years.

Today I have an assortment of clips for you, starting with Kim Iversen interviewing her latest geriatric presidential offering, Jesse Ventura (which doesn't go that well for her), and then moving to to see what Gray Zone, Secular Talk and Corbett Report have to say (or not say, in every case) about the Taibbi/Shellenberger House testimony. What we end up with are two approaches to addressing the Twitter Files, the hearing, and what it all reveals: 1) It's The Government, Stupid: label it as government censorship, imposed by the "national security state", the FBI, CIA, etc. This is what we've seen from Iversen, GrayZone and Taibbi himself. 2) Looks Like It Might Rain Some...: Don't talk about it at all, instead focus on the serious stuff - like the BLM legacy, endlessly promoting/worshipping Bernie the right leftist, and demonizing central banks as the true evil in the world. This is what we've seen from the Jewish operative Goodman, the philosemite Kulinski and the JQ-denier Corbett. The alternative can be summed up by saying you couldn't swing a dead cat in the giant Twitter File virtual room and not hit a Jew. I guess truth truly is in the eye of the beholder...

Today I have an assortment of clips for you, starting with Kim Iversen interviewing her latest geriatric presidential offering, Jesse Ventura (which doesn't go that well for her), and then moving on to see what Gray Zone, Secular Talk and Corbett Report have to say (or not say, in every case) about the Taibbi/Shellenberger House testimony. What we end up with are two approaches to addressing the Twitter Files, the hearing, and what it all reveals: 1) It's The Government, Stupid: label it as government censorship, imposed by the "national security state", the FBI, CIA, etc. This is what we've seen from Iversen, Blumenthal/Mate and Taibbi himself. 2) Looks Like It Might Rain Some...: Don't talk about it at all, instead focus on the serious stuff - like the BLM legacy, endlessly promoting/worshipping Bernie the right leftist, and demonizing central banks as the true evil in the world. This is what we've seen from the Jewish operative Goodman, the philosemite Kulinski and the JQ-denier Corbett. The alternative can be summed up by saying you couldn't swing a dead cat in the giant Twitter File virtual room and not hit a Jew. I guess truth truly is in the eye of the beholder...

I take a trip into my personal past with a nostalgia visit to Powers and Principalities, the years-long and highly dubious podcast project union between Tim Kelly and Joe Atwill, to see how time and experience might have changed the construction of their world view and narrative. But unfortunately... Atwill Cheatsheet: 1) It's the Freemasons, stupid, and always has been, always will be. 2) Today's incredibly obvious reality - especially related to the proxywar - is the massive role of Jews. So incorporate instead of deny (like James Corbett, for example), but never alter the basic narrative, which is Freemasonry all the time, and the Jewish players become simply a subset of that. 3) Everything is fake, which gets rid of the problem of explaining anything inconvenient. 4) Facts are simply things you make up, there is no need for any tangible, verifiable evidence. This is because you start with the conclusion, and then create facts to support it. It's clownworld, plain and simple...

I take a trip into my personal past with a nostalgia visit to Powers and Principalities, the years-long and highly dubious podcast project union between Tim Kelly and Joe Atwill, to see how time and experience might have changed the construction of their world view and narrative. But unfortunately...

Kim Iversen and Amy Goodman, that is, about the Taibbi/Shellenberger testimony in front of the House Special Committee on Avoiding the Real Problem last Thursday. Two very different takes, and both essentially wrong, to greater and lesser degrees. But when you're playing to an audience...

Kim Iversen and Amy Goodman, that is, about the Taibbi/Shellenberger testimony in front of the House Special Committee on Avoiding the Real Problem last Thursday. Two very different takes, and both essentially wrong, to greater and lesser degrees. But when you're playing to an audience...

I take a look at Matt Taibbi's morning-after-testifying podcast (at least the first half of it anyway) and what and who he thinks is important, and then a look at (again, the first half only) a six-week-old hopefully-contentious discussion managed by Jewish culture warrior Sam Harris, with T-Filers Michael Shellenberger and Jewish neocon toady Bari Weiss in one corner, and in the other corner Russiagate perpetrator crypto-Jew Renee DiResta. But has this squared circle actually been squared or is it just a cornerless circle still, with Bari's location undetermined? Is Shellenberger just an innocent abroad being covertly manipulated by these three aligned Jews? Will we ever know with the 2nd half of the discussion safely tucked behind Sam's paywall?? Sorry for the cutoff at the end - I needed 10 more seconds and didn't have them. And I sure would like to know how the rest of that discussion went, but I'm not gonna pay Sam for that privilege, nor am I gonna grovel for his free membership for the indigent... Here is my substack article on last week's congressional testimony: https://men56.substack.com/p/matt-taibbi-goes-full-congressional

I take a look at Matt Taibbi's morning-after-testifying podcast (at least the first half of it anyway) and what and who he thinks is important, and then a look at (again, the first half only) a six-week-old hopefully-contentious discussion managed by Jewish culture warrior Sam Harris, with T-Filers Michael Shellenberger and Jewish neocon toady Bari Weiss in one corner, and in the other corner Russiagate perpetrator crypto-Jew Renee DiResta. But has this squared circle actually been squared or is it just a cornerless circle still, with Bari's location undetermined? Is Shellenberger just an innocent abroad being covertly manipulated by these three aligned Jews? Will we ever know with the 2nd half of the discussion safely tucked behind Sam's paywall?? Here is my substack article on last week's congressional testimony: https://men56.substack.com/p/matt-taibbi-goes-full-congressional

I take a look at Matt Taibbi's morning-after-testifying podcast (at least the first half of it anyway) and what and who he thinks is important, and then a look at (again, the first half only) a six-week-old hopefully-contentious discussion managed by Jewish culture warrior Sam Harris, with T-Filers Michael Shellenberger and Jewish neocon toady Bari Weiss in one corner, and in the other corner Russiagate perpetrator crypto-Jew Renee DiResta. But has this squared circle actually been squared or is it just a cornerless circle still, with Bari's location undetermined? Is Shellenberger just an innocent abroad being covertly manipulated by these three aligned Jews? Will we ever know with the 2nd half of the discussion safely tucked behind Sam's paywall?? Here is my substack article on last week's congressional testimony: https://men56.substack.com/p/matt-taibbi-goes-full-congressional

I take a look at Matt Taibbi's morning-after-testifying podcast (at least the first half of it anyway) and what and who he thinks is important, and then a look at (again, the first half only) a six-week-old hopefully-contentious discussion managed by Jewish culture warrior Sam Harris, with T-Filers Michael Shellenberger and Jewish neocon toady Bari Weiss in one corner, and in the other corner Russiagate perpetrator crypto-Jew Renee DiResta. But has this squared circle actually been squared or is it just a cornerless circle still, with Bari's location undetermined? Is Shellenberger just an innocent abroad being covertly manipulated by these three aligned Jews? Will we ever know with the 2nd half of the discussion safely tucked behind Sam's paywall?? Here is my substack article on last week's congressional testimony: https://men56.substack.com/p/matt-taibbi-goes-full-congressional

I take a look at Matt Taibbi's morning-after-testifying podcast (at least the first half of it anyway) and what and who he thinks is important, and then a look at (again, the first half only) a six-week-old hopefully-contentious discussion managed by Jewish culture warrior Sam Harris, with T-Filers Michael Shellenberger and Jewish neocon toady Bari Weiss in one corner, and in the other corner Russiagate perpetrator crypto-Jew Renee DiResta. But has this squared circle actually been squared or is it just a cornerless circle still, with Bari's location undetermined? Is Shellenberger just an innocent abroad being covertly manipulated by these three aligned Jews? Will we ever know with the 2nd half of the discussion safely tucked behind Sam's paywall?? Here is my substack article on last week's congressional testimony: https://men56.substack.com/p/matt-taibbi-goes-full-congressional

In parts 2 and 3 I cover the first part of David Talbot's book The Devil's Chessboard on Allen Dulles, in which he exaggeratingly obsesses on the Holocaust as a way to condemn Dulles as a Nazi-sympathizing devil right out of the box. Is this history? Well, what is history exactly? Who writes it? Can anyone question it?

In parts 2 and 3 I cover the first part of David Talbot's book The Devil's Chessboard on Allen Dulles, in which he exaggeratingly obsesses on the Holocaust as a way to condemn Dulles as a Nazi-sympathizing devil right out of the box. Is this history? Well, what is history exactly? Who writes it? Can anyone question it?

In the first part here I show some recent bits from two Ragers againt the War Machine, Max Blumenthal and Jimmy Dore: Max walks the line I crossed on Brzezinski and Albright and almost gets real on who controls the Dem Party, while Jimmy's elevator speech on the war stays 100% compliant with the warmongers' ethnic-cleansing of any definition on that. In parts 2 and 3 I cover the first part of David Talbot's book The Devil's Chessboard on Allen Dulles, in which he exaggeratingly obsesses on the Holocaust as a way to condemn Dulles as a Nazi-sympathizing devil right out of the box. Is this history? Well, what is history exactly? Who writes it?

Following up on my last series of videos, I cover the anti-war rally and some of the speeches here, in the second part the best of them, that remotely by Cynthia McKinney. So can this effort against the proxywar be called a success? You make the call, but I think the only success here was self-promotion by some of the players involved. Fail.

Following up on my last series of videos, I cover the anti-war rally and some of the speeches here, in the second part the best of them, that remotely by Cynthia McKinney. So can this effort against the proxywar be called a success? You make the call, but I think the only success here was self-promotion by some of the players involved. Fail.

Oh, sorry, it's Ivermectin I can't mention and not Iversen. So what is infotainment warrior Kim up to these days, and what is wrong with that? The continuing evolution toward rightwingnutterism is the answer to the first question, and everything is the answer to the second. But regarding the most important matter of the day, the existential event that is the war in Ukraine, she is hardly alone - the appropriately-named Rage Against the War Machine rally shows the anti-war movement as defined by that (essentially leftist) has absolutely no chance of success. And that is as declared by they themselves, by where they so openly and clearly have drawn their red line. Idiots, simply idiots...

Oh, sorry, it's Ivermectin I can't mention and not Iversen. So what is infotainment warrior Kim up to these days, and what is wrong with that? The continuing evolution toward rightwingnutterism is the answer to the first question, and everything is the answer to the second. But regarding the most important matter of the day, the existential event that is the war in Ukraine, she is hardly alone - the appropriately-named Rage Against the War Machine rally shows the anti-war movement as defined by that (essentially leftist) has absolutely no chance of success. And that is as declared by they themselves, by where they so openly and clearly have drawn their red line. Idiots, simply idiots...

Oh, sorry, it's Ivermectin I can't mention and not Iversen. So what is infotainment warrior Kim up to these days, and what is wrong with that? The continuing evolution toward rightwingnutterism is the answer to the first question, and everything is the answer to the second. But regarding the most important matter of the day, the existential event that is the war in Ukraine, she is hardly alone - the appropriately-named Rage Against the War Machine rally shows the anti-war movement as defined by that (essentially leftist) has absolutely no chance of success. And that is as declared by they themselves, by where they so openly and clearly have drawn their red line. Idiots, simply idiots...

Oh, sorry, it's Ivermectin I can't mention and not Iversen. So what is infotainment warrior Kim up to these days, and what is wrong with that? The continuing evolution toward rightwingnutterism is the answer to the first question, and everything is the answer to the second. But regarding the most important matter of the day, the existential event that is the war in Ukraine, she is hardly alone - the appropriately-named Rage Against the War Machine rally shows the anti-war movement as defined by that (essentially leftist) has absolutely no chance of success. And that is as declared by they themselves, by where they so openly and clearly have drawn their red line. Idiots, simply idiots...

A lot of information is being produced these days, from the Twitter Files reporting to the testimony in front of the aptly-named House Subcommittee on Weaponization of the Government to Seymour Hersh's piece on the destruction of the Nordstream pipeline. But even as obvious as it has become, the real perps operating here are never addressed or even hinted at, including by "alternative" media who are pushing this stuff. In the actual final three videos (yes, I'm done today 😁) I finish the Gabbard interview, looking at the Hillary narratives she and Peterson echo, Hillary's early Jewish influences and why she may have been the real conduit for the "Clinton Sellout" in the 1990s. I also take a deeper look into the Taibbi Ham68 tweets and the Clint Watts/intelligence narrative he pushed versus the Laura Rosenberger/Jewish deep state narrative that I think is the correct one.

A lot of information is being produced these days, from the Twitter Files reporting to the testimony in front of the aptly-named House Subcommittee on Weaponization of the Government to Seymour Hersh's piece on the destruction of the Nordstream pipeline. But even as obvious as it has become, the real perps operating here are never addressed or even hinted at, including by "alternative" media who are pushing this stuff. In the actual final three videos (yes, I'm done today 😁) I finish the Gabbard interview, looking at the Hillary narratives she and Peterson echo, Hillary's early Jewish influences and why she may have been the real conduit for the "Clinton Sellout" in the 1990s. I also take a deeper look into the Taibbi Ham68 tweets and the Clint Watts/intelligence narrative he pushed versus the Laura Rosenberger/Jewish deep state narrative that I think is the correct one.

A lot of information is being produced these days, from the Twitter Files reporting to the testimony in front of the aptly-named House Subcommittee on Weaponization of the Government to Seymour Hersh's piece on the destruction of the Nordstream pipeline. But even as obvious as it has become, the real perps operating here are never addressed or even hinted at, including by "alternative" media who are pushing this stuff. In the actual final three videos (yes, I'm done today 😁) I finish the Gabbard interview, looking at the Hillary narratives she and Peterson echo, Hillary's early Jewish influences and why she may have been the real conduit for the "Clinton Sellout" in the 1990s. I also take a deeper look into the Taibbi Ham68 tweets and the Clint Watts/intelligence narrative he pushed versus the Laura Rosenberger/Jewish deep state narrative that I think is the correct one.

A lot of information is being produced these days, from the Twitter Files reporting to the testimony in front of the aptly-named House Subcommittee on Weaponization of the Government to Seymour Hersh's piece on the destruction of the Nordstream pipeline. But even as obvious as it has become, the real perps operating here are never addressed or even hinted at, including by "alternative" media who are pushing this stuff. In the final round of videos I focus on the end of a discussion on media, the CIA and the MIC involving Matt Taibbi, Chris Hedges and John Kiriakou, and a recent interview of Tulsi Gabbard by IDW frontman Jordan Peterson where she talks about her time in the Democractic party in DC. The bottom line question again: is there any reason to be optimistic at all, no matter how much is revealed? Or is this just alternative spin that gets no one closer to the answer?