MEN56

In these videos I will delve more deeply into this character, including going back further into his past, trying to determine what he knew and when he knew it, and I will make my best guess at what he's really up to and how that has evolved over time. In an epic marathon session today (parts 11-14) I finish up with Corbett's incredibly faulty 2012 AIG podcast with a very detailed dissection, mostly focused on Richard Grove's 2008 interview by Jack Blood, which is filled with lies, damned lies and misinformation. For anyone tackling this, I feel your pain - but I think there is value in this, related to Corbett, "expertise" and so much of 9/11 "Truth".

In these videos I will delve more deeply into this character, including going back further into his past, trying to determine what he knew and when he knew it, and I will make my best guess at what he's really up to and how that has evolved over time. In an epic marathon session today (parts 11-14) I finish up with Corbett's incredibly faulty 2012 AIG podcast with a very detailed dissection, mostly focused on Richard Grove's 2008 interview by Jack Blood, which is filled with lies, damned lies and misinformation. For anyone tackling this, I feel your pain - but I think there is value in this, related to Corbett, "expertise" and so much of 9/11 "Truth".

Well, because LTDGQ+++ simply CANNOT be thought of as "abnormal", to start with. But maybe it's/they're supposed to be "supernormal"? A couple unexpected collisions with the cultural Marxist paradigm in media had me thinking homophobic thoughts...

Well, because LTDGQ+++ simply CANNOT be thought of as "abnormal", to start with. But maybe it's/they're supposed to be "supernormal"? A couple unexpected collisions with the cultural Marxist paradigm in media had me thinking homophobic thoughts...

In these videos I will delve more deeply into this character, including going back further into his past, trying to determine what he knew and when he knew it, and I will make my best guess at what he's really up to and how that has evolved over time. In parts 7 I do a brief (30-minute 😄) summary and conclusion on his earliest work covered so far, speculating on the breadth of the changes in his worldview including his socio-political prospective that took place over a year, more or less. Then in part 8 I start to take a look at quality of his research using an interesting 2012 piece on AIG, a topic with which I am intimately familiar.

In these videos I will delve more deeply into this character, including going back further into his past, trying to determine what he knew and when he knew it, and I will make my best guess at what he's really up to and how that has evolved over time. In parts 7 I do a brief (30-minute 😄) summary and conclusion on his earliest work covered so far, speculating on the breadth of the changes in his worldview including his socio-political prospective that took place over a year, more or less. Then in part 8 I start to take a look at quality of his research using an interesting 2012 piece on AIG, a topic with which I am intimately familiar.

In these videos I will delve more deeply into this character, including going back further into his past, trying to determine what he knew and when he knew it, and I will make my best guess at what he's really up to and how that has evolved over time. In parts 9 and 10 related to Corbett's 2012 episode on AIG I finish up on the Clinton-Starr thing and then get into AIG and 9/11, which is the heart of his podcast.

In these videos I will delve more deeply into this character, including going back further into his past, trying to determine what he knew and when he knew it, and I will make my best guess at what he's really up to and how that has evolved over time. In parts 9 and 10 related to Corbett's 2012 episode on AIG I finish up on the Clinton-Starr thing and then get into AIG and 9/11, which is the heart of his podcast.

In these videos I will delve more deeply into this character, including going back further into his past, trying to determine what he knew and when he knew it, and I will make my best guess at what he's really up to and how that has evolved over time. In parts 3, 4 and 5 I finish with his 2009 self-description interview and then move back further to a 2008 episode called Meet Carroll Quigley that features none other than Bircher propagandist G. Edward Griffin. After a bit more from Griffin himself deep in the past I move forward to 2011 when Corbett addressed the John Birch Society for the first and only time (as much as I can determine). Again, this is about what he knew and when he knew it, and the deception involved in his presentation. Oh, and we get another nugget of his JQ denial in this as well.

In these videos I will delve more deeply into this character, including going back further into his past, trying to determine what he knew and when he knew it, and I will make my best guess at what he's really up to and how that has evolved over time. In parts 3, 4 and 5 I finish with his 2009 self-description interview and then move back further to a 2008 episode called Meet Carroll Quigley that features none other than Bircher propagandist G. Edward Griffin. After a bit more from Griffin himself deep in the past I move forward to 2011 when Corbett addressed the John Birch Society for the first and only time (as much as I can determine). Again, this is about what he knew and when he knew it, and the deception involved in his presentation. Oh, and we get another nugget of his JQ denial in this as well.

In these videos I will delve more deeply into this character, including going back further into his past, trying to determine what he knew and when he knew it, and I will make my best guess at what he's really up to and how that has evolved over time. In parts 3, 4 and 5 I finish with his 2009 self-description interview and then move back further to a 2008 episode called Meet Carroll Quigley that features none other than Bircher propagandist G. Edward Griffin. After a bit more from Griffin himself deep in the past I move forward to 2011 when Corbett addressed the John Birch Society for the first and only time (as much as I can determine). Again, this is about what he knew and when he knew it, and the deception involved in his presentation. Oh, and we get another nugget of his JQ denial in this as well.

In these videos I will delve more deeply into this character, including going back further into his past, trying to determine what he knew and when he knew it, and I will make my best guess at what he's really up to and how that has evolved over time. In parts 3, 4 and 5 I finish with his 2009 self-description interview and then move back further to a 2008 episode called Meet Carroll Quigley that features none other than Bircher propagandist G. Edward Griffin. After a bit more from Griffin himself deep in the past I move forward to 2011 when Corbett addressed the John Birch Society for the first and only time (as much as I can determine). Again, this is about what he knew and when he knew it, and the deception involved in his presentation. Oh, and we get another nugget of his JQ denial in this as well.

In these videos I will delve more deeply into this character, including going back further into his past, trying to determine what he knew and when he knew it, and I will make my best guess at what he's really up to and how that has evolved over time. In parts 2 and 3 I finish comparing him to Sam Harris, who has followed a similar path through a very different forest to what at least seems to be a somewhat common destination. The I start putting Corbett on the couch (since that's what he wants to do with all of us non-anarchists who are "opposed to freedom"), using his own words from a 2009 interview published a year later under the title Meet James Corbett. Here he addresses his history as a leftist and his awakening re 9/11 (and clearly other things) somewhere in the 2005-07 period.

In these videos I will delve more deeply into this character, including going back further into his past, trying to determine what he knew and when he knew it, and I will make my best guess at what he's really up to and how that has evolved over time. In parts 2 and 3 I finish comparing him to Sam Harris, who has followed a similar path through a very different forest to what at least seems to be a somewhat common destination. The I start putting Corbett on the couch (since that's what he wants to do with all of us non-anarchists who are "opposed to freedom"), using his own words from a 2009 interview published a year later under the title Meet James Corbett. Here he addresses his history as a leftist and his awakening re 9/11 (and clearly other things) somewhere in the 2005-07 period.

In these videos I will delve more deeply into this character, including going back further into his past, trying to determine what he knew and when he knew it, and I will make my best guess at what he's really up to and how that has evolved over time. I start by comparing him to Sam Harris, who has followed a similar path through a very different forest to what at least seems to be a somewhat common destination. Ultimately I will put Corbett on the couch, since that's what he wants to do with all of us non-anarchists who are "opposed to freedom"...

As promised, here is my latest Corbett-bashing video, "celebrating" the 15th anniversary of his website and Sam Harris-like emergence on the post-9/11-Iraq scene. This is tied to the twin problems of structuralism and JQ-denial discussed in my last videos on the radical left, but also gets into the other Corbett problems of sophistry, honesty and credibility. The first video is a warm-up on Corbett tactics and intentions (incl his establishing his right-wing street cred), the second gets into the heart of the matter (dishonest JQ-denial), and the third takes a look at all this using an older vid I'd never seen before yesterday. In an attempt to raise this to a higher plane, what I am suggesting here is the need to really delve into any source of information before accepting anything as true, or at least as reasonably credible. Understanding who someone is and what their motivations are is part of that process, of course.

As promised, here is my latest Corbett-bashing video, "celebrating" the 15th anniversary of his website and Sam Harris-like emergence on the post-9/11-Iraq scene. This is tied to the twin problems of structuralism and JQ-denial discussed in my last videos on the radical left, but also gets into the other Corbett problems of sophistry, honesty and credibility. The first video is a warm-up on Corbett tactics and intentions (incl his establishing his right-wing street cred), the second gets into the heart of the matter (dishonest JQ-denial), and the third takes a look at all this using an older vid I'd never seen before yesterday. In an attempt to raise this to a higher plane, what I am suggesting here is the need to really delve into any source of information before accepting anything as true, or at least as reasonably credible. Understanding who someone is and what their motivations are is part of that process, of course.

A couple brief moments of convergence...

As promised, here is my latest Corbett-bashing video, "celebrating" the 15th anniversary of his website and Sam Harris-like emergence on the post-9/11-Iraq scene. This is tied to the twin problems of structuralism and JQ-denial discussed in my last videos on the radical left, but also gets into the other Corbett problems of sophistry, honesty and credibility. The first video is a warm-up on Corbett tactics and intentions (incl his establishing his right-wing street cred), the second gets into the heart of the matter (dishonest JQ-denial), and the third takes a look at all this using an older vid I'd never seen before yesterday. In an attempt to raise this to a higher plane, what I am suggesting here is the need to really delve into any source of information before accepting anything as true, or at least as reasonably credible. Understanding who someone is and what their motivations are is part of that process, of course.

Today I conclude my exploration into the radical/Marxist left view of the war in Ukraine, first finishing up on the last of the Alan Woods articles, and then addressing the twin fundamental problems with this kind of analysis - structuralism and JQ-denialism. In the second part I compare the radical left with the extreme right, and part of that relates to the same failing on the right as on the left re structuralism (essentially utopian-based generalizations) and JQ-denial, the personifications of this being clownworld promoters Bircher G. Edward Griffin and neo-Bircher James Corbett. As I mention, I will follow this with a Corbett-bashing video which backs up some of this criticism.

Today I conclude my exploration into the radical/Marxist left view of the war in Ukraine, first finishing up on the last of the Alan Woods articles, and then addressing the twin fundamental problems with this kind of analysis - structuralism and JQ-denialism. In the second part I compare the radical left with the extreme right, and part of that relates to the same failing on the right as on the left re structuralism (essentially utopian-based generalizations) and JQ-denial, the personifications of this being clownworld promoters Bircher G. Edward Griffin and neo-Bircher James Corbett. As I mention, I will follow this with a Corbett-bashing video which backs up some of this criticism.

In this series of videos I will tackle the question of the true or Marxist left's position on this war, not from Jewish sources but considering the huge debt these political thinkers owe to the Jews - are their positions based on philosophical bedrock or the shifting nature of kosher sand? Are they hopelessly trapped in the deep dark past, like their neo-Bircher brethren on the extereme right, their thinking also rooted in the world of a century ago? In the final four videos in this series I analyze five articles which appeared on the In Defense of Marxism website written by its principal, Alan Woods, in February-April. The first three cover that and the fourth will mostly be summary and conclusions, and also a comparison between the radical left and extreme right in terms of their common failings.

In this series of videos I will tackle the question of the true or Marxist left's position on this war, not from Jewish sources but considering the huge debt these political thinkers owe to the Jews - are their positions based on philosophical bedrock or the shifting nature of kosher sand? Are they hopelessly trapped in the deep dark past, like their neo-Bircher brethren on the extereme right, their thinking also rooted in the world of a century ago? In the final four videos in this series I analyze five articles which appeared on the In Defense of Marxism website written by its principal, Alan Woods, in February-April. The first three cover that and the fourth will mostly be summary and conclusions, and also a comparison between the radical left and extreme right in terms of their common failings.

In this series of videos I will tackle the question of the true or Marxist left's position on this war, not from Jewish sources but considering the huge debt these political thinkers owe to the Jews - are their positions based on philosophical bedrock or the shifting nature of kosher sand? Are they hopelessly trapped in the deep dark past, like their neo-Bircher brethren on the extereme right, their thinking also rooted in the world of a century ago? In the final four videos in this series I analyze five articles which appeared on the In Defense of Marxism website written by its principal, Alan Woods, in February-April. The first three cover that and the fourth will mostly be summary and conclusions, and also a comparison between the radical left and extreme right in terms of their common failings.

Grayzone published several videos last week from a discussion between Blumenthal and alt journo Jeremy Loffredo on Davos/the WEF, Nazi Klaus Schwab and his Great Reset, Bill Gates and Jeffrey Epstein, and Victor Pinchuk and his Russia WarCrimes House. So why is Max continuing to mine the conspiratorial clownword right for ideas? Can he ethnically-cleanse and misdirect this stuff to the extreme extent that James Corbett manages? What is really going on here?? Btw, the other Russian oligarch Max mentions here is Dmytro Furtash, who is actually Ukrainian (ethnically as well as birth). His wiki says this: "As a middleman for the Russian natural gas giant Gazprom and with connections to the Kremlin, Firtash funneled money into the campaigns of pro-Russia politicians in Ukraine. Firtash obtained his position with the agreement of Russian president Vladimir Putin and, according to Firtash, Russian [Jewish, of course] organized crime boss Semion Mogilevich... The United States Justice Department has characterized Firtash as an 'upper-echelon associate of Russian organized crime.' He was arrested by Austrian authorities in March 2014 and has since been in Vienna fighting extradition to the United States, where he is under federal indictment for an alleged bribery scheme. American attorneys Joe diGenova and Victoria Toensing, associates of then-president Donald Trump and his personal attorney Rudy Giuliani, were hired by Firtash in July 2019 to fight his extradition, as Giuliani sought information in Ukraine to damage Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden."