RichardGage911

What is “Propelled Demolition”? and how might it differ from traditional Controlled Demolition? Can a consistent hypothesis be created that knits together the evidence presented by my previous guests on RichardGage911Unleashed? What structural weaknesses in the design of the Twin Towers may have been exploited, resulting in the outward ejection of almost all of the building’s components? How might a “Propelled Demolition” leverage resonance (natural frequency)? What quantity of “energetic” materials must have been used? Where must it have been placed in the towers? Why are there no distinct sounds of explosions except for those immediately preceding the destruction? How is it that more than 1,000 victims of the Twin Towers disappeared without a trace? Why was molten iron flowing from the South Tower near the point of the plane impact? How did the plane enter the towers without "severing" the individual steel perimeter columns? My guest tonight is Wayne Coste - a licensed professional engineer with nearly 50 years of experience, and a 9/11 Truth Analyst as well. He has a Bachelor of Science from the University of Connecticut. He was on the AE911Truth board of directors and had been a volunteer there for 6 years. He launched Truth Outreach, Inc., which is the not-for-profit organization sponsoring the 9/11 Truth Action Project. Wayne co-authored the paper "Ethics and the Official Reports about the Destruction of the World Trade Center Twin Towers (WTC1 and WTC2) on 9/11: A Case Study," which was presented at the 2014 IEEE International Symposium on Ethics in Engineering, Science and Technology. Additionally, he coauthored the paper, “The World Trade Center Analyses: Case Study of Ethics, Public Policy and the Engineering Profession” in 2015. This paper was accepted by, SEFI, the European Engineering Association after a peer review process – and was published in the SEFI 2015 conference proceedings. Learn more at https://RichardGage911.org Content Managed by ContentSafe.co

9/11: An Architect’s Guide | Part 2: The Twin Towers’ Explosive Destruction Course Number: RG911-AAG-OD2 Three-part webinar series. Each part is about 1 1/2 hours. We are an organization dedicated to conducting research and providing education about the complete destruction of the three World Trade Center skyscrapers, our courses give architects the technical knowledge and analytical framework with which to evaluate the most likely cause of those building failures. Course Description: Never before has a steel-framed high-rise collapsed from fire. Why, then, did three such buildings collapse on September 11, 2001? In Part 2 of “9/11: An Architect’s Guide,” Richard Gage, AIA, provides an overview of the most important evidence related to the explosiveness of the Twin Towers’ destruction. Much like that of WTC 7, the destruction of the Twin Towers exhibited most of the features of controlled demolition. In 2005, the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) concluded that the Twin Towers’ destruction resulted from the combined effects of the airplane impact damage and ensuing fires. Is NIST’s explanation for these unprecedented structural failures valid? Decide for yourself after watching this informative one-hour presentation. Using the information presented, you will be able to evaluate which of the two hypotheses — fire-induced failure or controlled demolition �� is more consistent with the evidence. Learning Objectives: Participants will be able to: 1. Describe the characteristics of building fires and the aspects of high-rise design that contribute to make fire-induced failure in steel-framed high-rise buildings a rare occurrence. 2. Recognize the distinct features associated with fire-induced failure and the distinct features associated with the procedure of controlled demolition. 3. Describe step-by-step the series of structural failures that the National Institute of Standards and Technology found to be the most likely cause of the collapse of World Trade Center Twin Towers. 4. Analyze the physical evidence and the dynamics of the collapse of the Twin Towers according to how consistent it is with the competing hypotheses of fire-induced failure and controlled demolition. Learn more: https://RichardGage911.org Content Managed by ContentSafe.co

9/11: An Architect’s Guide | Part 2: The Twin Towers’ Explosive Destruction Course Number: RG911-AAG-OD2 Please like, share, subscribe! Three-part webinar series. Each part is about 1 1/2 hours. We are an organization dedicated to conducting research and providing education about the complete destruction of the three World Trade Center skyscrapers, our courses give architects the technical knowledge and analytical framework with which to evaluate the most likely cause of those building failures. Course Description: Never before has a steel-framed high-rise collapsed from fire. Why, then, did three such buildings collapse on September 11, 2001? In Part 2 of “9/11: An Architect’s Guide,” Richard Gage, AIA, provides an overview of the most important evidence related to the explosiveness of the Twin Towers’ destruction. Much like that of WTC 7, the destruction of the Twin Towers exhibited most of the features of controlled demolition. In 2005, the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) concluded that the Twin Towers’ destruction resulted from the combined effects of the airplane impact damage and ensuing fires. Is NIST’s explanation for these unprecedented structural failures valid? Decide for yourself after watching this informative one-hour presentation. Using the information presented, you will be able to evaluate which of the two hypotheses — fire-induced failure or controlled demolition �� is more consistent with the evidence. Learning Objectives: Participants will be able to: 1. Describe the characteristics of building fires and the aspects of high-rise design that contribute to make fire-induced failure in steel-framed high-rise buildings a rare occurrence. 2. Recognize the distinct features associated with fire-induced failure and the distinct features associated with the procedure of controlled demolition. 3. Describe step-by-step the series of structural failures that the National Institute of Standards and Technology found to be the most likely cause of the collapse of World Trade Center Twin Towers. 4. Analyze the physical evidence and the dynamics of the collapse of the Twin Towers according to how consistent it is with the competing hypotheses of fire-induced failure and controlled demolition. For more info: https://RichardGage911.org Content Managed by ContentSafe.co

She was a prisoner of conscience and remains a model of great courage - caught up in a web of treason. Why did the CIA pressure Iraq during the summer of 2001 to “find evidence of an attack on the World Trade Center using planes”? Why did they threaten Iraq with being “bombed back into the stone age” if they “failed to notify the US after discovering a terrorist conspiracy”? And why did the FBI ignore Iraq’s attempted compliance with these demands? Only to later blame Iraq for withholding such evidence, in the US drum-up to war? My Guest Susan Lindauer was caught right in the middle of this schizophrenic “diplomacy” that was set “up for failure” from its inception. Why was she ignored by Attorney General Ashcroft’s office with her warnings, specifically directed by her CIA supervisor, warnings as specific as “the target was the World Trade Center, which would suffer some sort of aerial strike using hijacked airplanes”? Why was she arrested, held under indictment for five years without a trial and then thrown into an Air Force Base prison for a year, without a hearing? Why was she threatened with forcible injections of a dangerous drug causing Parkinson's-Disease-like symptoms if she didn’t recant her claims of knowing in advance about the 9/11 terrorist attacks? Yes – she is a former Intelligence Asset for both the CIA and Defense departments. She is the author of EXTREME PREJUDICE, the Terrifying Story of the Patriot Act and the Cover Ups of 9/11 and Iraq. She was supported in testimony sworn under oath in federal court by civilian witnesses who even recounted her prior detailed advance warnings of the 9/11 attack. An incredible heroic woman with an unbelievable but unfortunately true story. Learn more at https://RichardGage911.org Content Managed by ContentSafe.co

He was there! And he witnessed the plane that hit the South Tower—right over his head, as he was entering the building. In fact he was inside both Towers after the planes hit them! Let’s ask him why he in the world was entering the un-hit South Tower after the North Tower was already hit! What exactly did he see up there?! How did he survive the explosions that blew him back from the face of the South Tower across the plaza deck? How did he capture his incredible photos that day that he will be sharing with you on this exclusive podcast? How did he have the presence of mind to capture these amazing photos—after being injured in the explosion? Ricki is my guest on RichardGage911Unleashed!, Join in as he takes us on his harrowing journey that fateful day—witnessing yet more damning evidence against the official narrative! He worked for the US Treasury for 7 years. He was no stranger to the financial district of Manhattan and its World Trade Center, having traversed its incredible spaces every day for 10 years. He had over 15 years’ experience with Boards and Committees, in executive management as CFO and Transitioning CEO positions. Mr. DeSantis is still currently dealing with severe debilitating health issues related to that day from the Toxic Fumes and Materials from the World Trade Center Complex on 09/11/2001. For more info visit https://RichardGage911.org Content Managed by ContentSafe.co

Why do we humans have so much psychological, and even spiritual, fear? Why are some driven by fear more than others? How did fear affect us following 9/11? And after the advent of Covid? What are the psycho-social parallels of the 9/11 and Covid crisis? What are the sacred myths of 9/11 and Covid? And, how did these allowable narratives propagate worldwide so quickly? How does our human tendency to believe our authority figures and to conform, cause us to react? How are people really affected psychologically by mandatory mask wearing, social distancing, lockdowns and experimental gene therapy? How does fear of invisible terrorists and of invisible disease, stoked by government and media, create a "mass formation psychosis"? And finally, how is healing even possible at this point? Join us on this walk with a master depth-psychotherapist – if you’re ready! My guest, Fran Shure has had a full career as a psychological therapist specializing in early trauma. She is one of the co-founders of the very active Colorado 9/11 Truth. She was featured in my 2013 documentary "9/11 Explosive Evidence: Experts Speak Out", and helped to produce the video "The Demolition of Truth-Psychologists Examine 9/11", which was aired on Colorado Public Television. She has written dozens of essays collectively titled “Why Do Good People Become Silent–or Worse–About 9/11?" which is found at https://911SpeakOut.org and very soon at https://RichardGage911.org Visit https://RichardGage911.org Content Managed by ContentSafe.co

Why are the 9/11 eyewitnesses so important? And what do their accounts reveal about the destruction of the Twin Towers? What was our government’s response to the 156 first-responder witnesses of explosions? What was the response to the coverage of explosions from 36 TV Reporters that day? How can the eyewitnesses pave the way to truth in such Deep State events? Visit https://RichardGage911.org What did the testimony of 50 eyewitnesses reveal about the JFK assassination? How were they treated? And the witnesses of the RFK shooting? What are the patterns that develop across these Deep State events—including 9/11 and the current Covid-19? And what do they reveal to us about our government? My guest is the consummate 9/11 researcher, Prof. Graeme MacQueen, who was relentless on the Global the War on Terror as a critic. He is a member of the 9/11 Consensus Panel and has been a co-editor of the Journal of 9/11 Studies. He was on the organizing committee of the 2011 Toronto Hearings on 9/11. Graeme has also written numerous articles on the events of 9/11 as well as the book 2001 Anthrax Deception: The Case for a Domestic Conspiracy. He has also produced the most detailed study to date of the 2014 shootings in Ottawa, Canada, which have been used as a pretext for undermining the civil liberties of Canadians. Born and raised in Nova Scotia, Graeme MacQueen received his Ph.D. in Buddhist Studies from Harvard University and taught in the Religious Studies department of McMaster University in Hamilton, Ontario for 30 years. Content Managed by ContentSafe.co

9/11: An Architect’s Guide | Part 1 - World Trade Center 7 Course Number: RG911-AAG-OD1 Live three-part webinar series. Each part is about 1 1/2 hours long Richard Gage, AIA, Architect is dedicated to conducting research and providing education about the complete destruction of the three World Trade Center skyscrapers, my courses provide the technical knowledge and analytical framework with which to evaluate the most likely cause of those building failures. Course Description: In Part 1 of “9/11: An Architect’s Guide,” Richard Gage, AIA, provides an overview of the most important and readily understandable evidence regarding the destruction of World Trade Center Building 7 (WTC 7), a 47-story high-rise that was not struck by an airplane. The damage WTC 7 suffered from the collapse of the North Tower was found to be inconsequential. It had fires that were similar to those that have occurred previously in high-rise buildings. Yet it fell symmetrically into its own footprint in the manner of a typical controlled demolition. In 2008, the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) concluded that WTC 7’s destruction was caused by normal office fires that burned “at temperatures hundreds of degrees below those typically considered in design practice for establishing structural fire resistance ratings.” Is NIST’s explanation for this unprecedented structural failure valid? Decide for yourself after watching this informative one-hour presentation. Using the information presented, you will be able to evaluate which of the two hypotheses — fire-induced failure or controlled demolition — is more consistent with the evidence. Learning Objectives: Participants will be able to: 1. Describe the characteristics of building fires and the aspects of high-rise design that contribute to make fire-induced failure in steel-framed high-rise buildings a rare occurrence. 2. Recognize the distinct features associated with fire-induced failure and the distinct features associated with the procedure of controlled demolition. 3. Describe step-by-step the series of structural failures that the National Institute of Standards and Technology found to be the most likely cause of the collapse of World Trade Center Building 7. 4. Analyze the physical evidence and dynamics of Building 7’s collapse according to how consistent they are with the competing hypotheses of fire-induced failure and controlled demolition. For more information: visit https://RichardGage911.org​ Content Managed by ContentSafe.co

Do your friends have you pegged as a “conspiracy theorist”? How can you easily shift their paradigm? What are the new rules of communicating about 9/11? My Guest is Benny Wills, Acclaimed Poet, JoyCamp Comedian, Actor, and my favorite 9/11 communication coach! He is an emcee and YouTube personality, and is well known for his work on the comedic conspiracy channel JoyCamp as well as MEME Monday, a weekly show on his personal channel. Watch Benny’s new Coronavirus Virus | The REAL Pandemic! Benny helps people fight through the division by communicating more effectively using his online course Parrhesia: The Art of Communication. Content Managed by ContentSafe.co

My Guest is Lawrence Fine of 9/11 Synthesis - with Bill Brandon Geologist At-large What are these deep holes in the bedrock underneath World Trade Center Building 4? Are the geologist reports correct that call them Pleistocene (Ice Age) Plunge Pools and Potholes? Are they 12,000+ years old? or are they only 20 years old? Why were they discovered post 9/11 but not before? How did they get under WTC 4? My guest on “RichardGage911:Unleashed!” is 9/11 Researcher Lawrence Fine, the creator of 9/11 Synthesis. In 2019 he fell headlong into the seemingly bottomless pit—deep in the WTC bedrock. And he’s been trying ever since to pull me in also. I have to admit that it is a fascinating mystery and so I’m going to pull you down into it with us tonight. Geologists Cheryl Moss at Mueser Rutledge Consulting Engineers and Charles Merguerian at Hofstra University point to large basins with “waterslides” that were scoured out and filled with densely packed clay and silt on top of rounded polished boulders. The cause of this phenomena according to these engineers? Water erosion with whirlpools during an Ice-age melt. But Lawrence suspects extreme heat as the cause of the erosion of the bedrock and that they were formed on 9/11! He notes that the basins were not shown on the pre-9/11 geological survey – only on the post-geological survey. Was there some extreme heat event then on 9/11 which caused the erosion? If so, then why would the erosion be under WTC4—which was not destroyed like WTC 1, 2 & 7. Let’s explore this mystery deeper on RichardGage911:Unleashed! Lawrence Fine joined the Air Force as an aircraft B-52 ground crew mechanic. He then applied himself at various machine shops becoming a machine maintenance technician for Honeywell. He then designed and constructed World-Class recording studios with Michael Blackmer. Music is a passion for Lawrence and he plays multiple instruments – writing and performing music in several bands. He then worked as the Senior Exhibit Maintenance Technician at the Boston Museum of Science; then as consultant & designer for a magical techno-imagination company called TechnoFrolics; then on his own as consultant, designer, fabricator of precision protypes; and now… he’s tinkering with designs for his rocket stoves; and… of course, 9/11 Synthesis and the deep basins of the World Trade Center. For more info: https://RichardGage911.org Https://Lorenzonine.Wixsite.Com/Nineelevensynthesis Content Managed by ContentSafe.co

How does an explosives expert look at the collapse of 3 skyscrapers on 9/11? What does he see - that we don’t? What does the evidence reveal to him? What really is an explosive vs. a propellant vs. pyrotechnics vs. an incendiary? How and where are they used? My guest is Mark Lillie, an engineer of explosives, and the like, for more than 30 years. He has designed devices in high-profile programs such as the MX, Peacekeeper, and Trident 5 ballistic missiles – as well as the Space Shuttle solid fuel rocket booster. He has invented novel commercial blasting agents and has set off millions of pounds of explosives – performing everything from small scale test shots to million-pound mine production shots. So don’t piss him off during the Q&A! Mark holds a degree in Chemical Engineering from Arizona State University where he also performed graduate level research. He specialized in the development and manufacture of propellants, explosives, pyrotechnics, and explosive devices, with DOD contracts - for decades. He worked at Takata as an Engineering Manager. It was in this capacity that he challenged the introduction of Takata’s Ammonium Nitrate-based airbag inflator propellants as being unsafe and became a whistleblower. He returned to DOD contracting for the final phase of his explosive career, managing a large-scale demilitarization program at Ft. Wingate Army Depot. For more info: https://RichardGage911.org Content Managed by ContentSafe.co

Madhava Setty, MD, is my guest tonight - former Director of Anesthesiology at Lawrence General Hospital, Electrical Engineer, and Author of “WOKE – an Anesthesiologist’s View." What can an anesthesiologist teach us about 9/11? You’ll be surprised. This one, who made his own fearful journey through that great awakening moment, asks of us in WOKE, “Why is it so hard to get people to see what’s right in front of them?” It must be something deeper. That’s where were going in this podcast—deeper. He takes us into our internal responses that form our individual comfort zones out of our deepest need—security. He invites us to look at our own biases that shut down our objectivity – subjecting us further to manipulation as well as tyranny. Madhava is primarily an anesthesiologist—most interested in how we, as individuals, know what we know. It doesn't require much inquiry to see that most of us adopt narratives largely from what we have been told. See what being truly awake means to this anesthesiologist. Come…. examine yourself with my guest Madhava Setty. I will join you on this step—outside of our comfort zone! ____________________________ Madhava Setty graduated from MIT in 1988 with a degree in Electrical Engineering. He spent six years in the aerospace and defense industry building simulation systems and computer graphic interfaces. He participated in global research expeditions, including to the polar ice cap funded by the Office of Naval Research (ONR). Having realized by this time the nature of the Deep State, he refused to be recruited into the darker activities with the military and so began a new career in 1998 at Baylor College of Medicine, emerging with an MD with further training in anesthesiology at UPENN, serving as Chief Resident (2002). Then as Clinical Anesthesiologist and Director of Anesthesia at Lawrence General Hospital (2014-2017). He spends more time writing these days, including Author of the Book "WOKE. An Anesthesiologist's View" Host of the "Setty Report" on ThePulse. Content Managed by ContentSafe.co

9/11: An Architect’s Guide | Part 3: The Twin Towers and Extreme Heat Course Number: RG911-AAG-L3 Live three-part webinar series. Each part is about 1 1/2 hours long. We at http://RichardGage911.org are dedicated to conducting research and providing education about the complete destruction of the three World Trade Center skyscrapers, our courses give architects the technical knowledge and analytical framework with which to evaluate the most likely cause of those building failures. Course Description: Never before has a steel-framed high-rise collapsed from fire. Why, then, did three such buildings collapse on September 11, 2001? In Part 3 of “9/11: An Architect’s Guide,” Richard Gage, AIA, provides an overview of the most important evidence related to the extreme heat observed both before and after the Twin Towers’ destruction. As documented extensively in the report issued by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), molten metal was seen pouring out of the South Tower during the seven minutes leading up to its collapse. Molten metal was also observed in the debris of both buildings, while various other evidence of extreme heat and incendiary chemical reactions have been documented since. In 2005, NIST concluded that the Twin Towers’ destruction resulted from the combined effects of the airplane impact damage and ensuing fires, both of which are phenomena that fail to account for the extreme heat observed before and after the Twin Towers’ destruction. Does NIST’s explanation for these unprecedented structural failures explain all of the evidence? Together, we will study the collapses and evaluate which of the two leading hypotheses — fire-induced failure or controlled demolition — is more consistent with the evidence. Participants will be encouraged to decide for themselves if a new investigation is warranted. Learning Objectives: Participants will be able to: 1. Describe the characteristics of building fires and the aspects of high-rise design that contribute to make fire-induced failure in steel-framed high-rise buildings a rare occurrence. 2. Recognize the distinct features associated with fire-induced failure and the distinct features associated with the procedure of controlled demolition. 3. Describe step-by-step the series of structural failures that the National Institute of Standards and Technology found to be the most likely cause of the collapse of World Trade Center Twin Towers. 4. Analyze the physical evidence and the dynamics of the collapse of the Twin Towers according to how consistent it is with the competing hypotheses of fire-induced failure and controlled demolition. Visit http://RichardGage911.org for more information. Content Managed by ContentSafe.co

What are the 5 secrets of starting and running a great 9/11 Truth group? What kinds of events and speakers will bring in the truth-aware people—and the public? How do you best promote these events out there? What outreach materials are the most successful? What kinds of comments and emotions do you get from the public? How do you maintain relevance 20 years after the events of 9/11/01? How do you balance your group members’ needs for Freedom of Speech with the groups’ need for coherency and control of topic? What topics should you embrace? Or avoid?! What other groups in the 9/11 Truth Movement do you collaborate with to ensure success? Who do you stay away from? These are among the nitty gritty questions that we will be tackling on tonight’s RichardGage911:Unleashed! podcast from https://RichardGage911.org My Guests are Al Magaleta and Christopher Gruener from Boston 9/11 Truth—and they have been at it for about 15 years—since 2007 when they hosted the great documentary by Sophia Smallstorm, “9/11 Mysteries”! Chris is a licensed Mental Health Counselor, as well as a Marriage and Family Therapist, and has a masters degree in clinical psychology. We hope that he will bring that experience to bear relative to today’s topic—deep denial of 9/11 facts. He also volunteers on worthy charitable efforts such as the School Gardens project in Belize and bicycle related activities in cooperation with Bikes Not Bombs! Al is a lifelong resident of eastern Massachusetts with 27 years of experience in residential and commercial real estate, property management, and new construction. He even ran his own international export company! If you listen carefully to the secrets you will learn how to manage your own 9/11 Truth group. And get this…they have even offered to help you personally! Contact them at http://Boston911Truth.org For more info: https://RichardGage911.org Content Managed by ContentSafe.co

My guests on RG911:Unleashed! are inviting you to co-produce this powerful new 9/11 film series! I’ve partnered with the Lawyers Committee for 9/11 Inquiry to create 9/11: Crime Scene to Courtroom, which combines the world’s leading 9/11 WTC spokesperson with the world’s leading 9/11 litigation team led by attorney Mick Harrison. For the first time, this film will cover the hard WTC evidence from both the technical and legal sides, bringing to the screen the WTC Petition evidentiary Exhibits for both the public and the actual Grand Jury. My guests: Kristina Borjesson is an Emmy Award winning investigative journalist and filmmaker. In TWA Flight 800 she exposed egregious government corruption and cover-up of the destruction of that aircraft as a result of ordinance. Her vast experience includes reporting and filmmaking for major television networks including CBS, CNN and PBS. Attorney Mick Harrison is a founder of the Lawyers’ Committee non-profit organization and serves as Litigation Director and Executive Director. Mick is an experienced public interest plaintiffs’ attorney with a national practice focused on whistleblower protection, government oversight and accountability, and environmental protection. Barbara Honegger is an Investigative Researcher and Board Member for the Lawyers’ Committee for 9/11 Inquiry. She was a former Reagan White House and Dept. of Justice Official, and a 16-year DoD Senior Military Affairs Journalist. This exciting new creative project is the result of a combination of fortuitous factors: The launch of my new organization and website RichardGage911.org and my having been invited to join the board of directors of the Lawyers Committee for 9/11 Inquiry in the wake of being now solo from AE911Truth as of September. Donate Now! https://www.lawyerscommitteefor9-11inquiry.org/donate/ LC911 has already submitted a petition to the US Attorney for the Southern District of New York for a Special Criminal Grand Jury to investigate the World Trade Center crimes, citing and supported by 60 evidentiary Exhibits, and this new film will be submitted as a supplement to the original Petition which must, by law, be given to the Grand Jury! This film willlet Yousee what the Grand Jurors will actually see, as Mick, myself, and other expert witnesses look right into your eyes and ask youto watch and judge for yourselves the dispositive irrefutable scientific evidence for the controlled demolition of WTC 1, 2, and 7. You will be invited to weigh in on the evidence, episode by episode, with real-time feedback for the production of the next episode in the series, including who would be the most important witnesses for the actual Grand Jury to subpoena! Donate Now! https://www.lawyerscommitteefor9-11inquiry.org/donate/ Just imagine the jurors seeing this professionally made film highlighting the evidence, as deeply developed in my presentations over the years, watching Building Seven, not having been hit by a plane, and after witnesses hearing explosions, go down suddenly, smoothly and symmetrically at free-fall acceleration—as fast as a bowling ball falling from the sky—with absolutely NO resistance from ANY of the building’s 80 columns.Imagine seeing the look on their faces as they see the compelling peer-reviewed evidence of both ignited and unignited thermite incendiaries at the World Trade Center, as well as the explosive testimony from hundreds of first responders and TV reporters. And that’s just the beginning of the compelling evidence in this film series! It will be divided into 20-minute segments and released free on YouTube-type platforms over the next six months. Additional expert witnesses will dive deeper into the critical evidence, and Family Members of 9/11 victims will share their personal stories. Our Emmy Award winning director is Kristina Borjesson, whose explosive documentary TWA Flight 800 exposed egregious government corruption and cover-up of the destruction of that plane due to explosive ordinance. Her professional experience includes producing for major television networks such as CNN, PBS and CBS, including with Dan Rather. Rather courageously declared live on 9/11 that the collapse of WTC 7 looked like it was brought down with dynamite. This project is exactly what the 9/11 Truth Movement needs at this time. The WTC evidence in the 60 Petition Exhibits that it brings to life and the legal framework it provides, strongly supports the testimony of the four 9/11 Families’ 20-year struggle for justice featured in the powerful recently released AE911Truth documentary Unspeakable directed by Dylan Avery. For more info: https://RichardGage911.org Content Managed by ContentSafe.co

9/11: An Architect’s Guide | Part 2: The Twin Towers’ Explosive Destruction Course Number: RG911-AAG-OD2 Three-part webinar series. Each part is about 1 1/2 hours. We are an organization dedicated to conducting research and providing education about the complete destruction of the three World Trade Center skyscrapers, our courses give architects the technical knowledge and analytical framework with which to evaluate the most likely cause of those building failures. Course Description: Never before has a steel-framed high-rise collapsed from fire. Why, then, did three such buildings collapse on September 11, 2001? In Part 2 of “9/11: An Architect’s Guide,” Richard Gage, AIA, provides an overview of the most important evidence related to the explosiveness of the Twin Towers’ destruction. Much like that of WTC 7, the destruction of the Twin Towers exhibited most of the features of controlled demolition. In 2005, the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) concluded that the Twin Towers’ destruction resulted from the combined effects of the airplane impact damage and ensuing fires. Is NIST’s explanation for these unprecedented structural failures valid? Decide for yourself after watching this informative one-hour presentation. Using the information presented, you will be able to evaluate which of the two hypotheses — fire-induced failure or controlled demolition �� is more consistent with the evidence. Learning Objectives: Participants will be able to: 1. Describe the characteristics of building fires and the aspects of high-rise design that contribute to make fire-induced failure in steel-framed high-rise buildings a rare occurrence. 2. Recognize the distinct features associated with fire-induced failure and the distinct features associated with the procedure of controlled demolition. 3. Describe step-by-step the series of structural failures that the National Institute of Standards and Technology found to be the most likely cause of the collapse of World Trade Center Twin Towers. 4. Analyze the physical evidence and the dynamics of the collapse of the Twin Towers according to how consistent it is with the competing hypotheses of fire-induced failure and controlled demolition. Learn more: https://RichardGage911.org Content Managed by ContentSafe.co

Just how fast is free-fall acceleration? And what does it mean when a building collapses that fast? My guest on RichardGage911:Unleashed! brings you back to high school and shows how easy it is to talk to your friends about the problem of World Trade Center Building 7. David became involved with studying the building collapses at the World Trade Center when he realized that he could use the video frame tracking software thathe used in his physics teaching, to measure various velocities and accelerations associated with the 9/11 building collapses. He is best known for his measurements demonstrating the absolute freefall of World Trade Center Building 7, proving that NIST’s claims about that building were false. His work forced NIST to correct their final report to admit that the building came down in freefall, even though they continue to deny its clear implications. David has authored and co-authored a number of scientific papers related to 9/11, including “Destruction of the World Trade Center North Tower” and “Fundamental Physics”. He has also created a large number of videos analyzing various moving components in the World Trade Center—including the ones he custom-made for my “9/11:Blueprint for Truth” presentation which I have given now more than 650 times around the world! His videos are free to watch now on YouTube & BitChute. In the last several years David has delved into the attack on the Pentagon and has opened a can of worms in the 9/11 Truth Movement. We’re bypassing that most controversial subject this time around but we will “circle back” with him in a few months when we dip our toes into that mess at RichardGage911:Unleashed! after we develop enough sturdy ground to stand on ourselves as we continue to fly solo. He maintains a website hosting his own research in collaboration with several other researchers at911speakout.org. David has earned a Bachelor’s degree in physics, a Master’s degree in education, and another one in Mathematics!A few years ago he retired from 35 years of teaching physics and mathematics at the high school and college levels. Since about 2007 he has been active as a researcher with the "science wing" of the 9/11 Truth Movement.For a number of years he worked directly with Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth and served with me on its board of directors. He is currently the Coordinator of https://Scientistsfor911Truth.org Visit https://RichardGage911.org Download and listen to the .mp3 audio file. Copy & paste this link into a browser: https://www.dropbox.com/s/jgaqd8okljcz3hi/David%20Chandler_%20The%20Simple%20Physics%20of%20the%20World%20Trade%20Center%20Collapses.mp3?dl=0 Content Managed by ContentSafe.co

9/11: An Architect’s Guide | Part 1 - World Trade Center 7 Course Number: RG911-AAG-OD1 Live three-part webinar series. Each part is about 1 1/2 hours long Richard Gage, AIA, Architect is dedicated to conducting research and providing education about the complete destruction of the three World Trade Center skyscrapers, my courses provide the technical knowledge and analytical framework with which to evaluate the most likely cause of those building failures. Course Description: In Part 1 of “9/11: An Architect’s Guide,” Richard Gage, AIA, provides an overview of the most important evidence regarding the destruction of World Trade Center Building 7 (WTC 7), a 47-story high-rise that was not struck by an airplane. The damage WTC 7 suffered from the collapse of the North Tower was found to be inconsequential. It had fires that were similar to those that have occurred previously in high-rise buildings. Yet it fell symmetrically into its own footprint in the manner of a typical controlled demolition. In 2008, the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) concluded that WTC 7’s destruction was caused by normal office fires that burned “at temperatures hundreds of degrees below those typically considered in design practice for establishing structural fire resistance ratings.” Is NIST’s explanation for this unprecedented structural failure valid? Decide for yourself after watching this informative one-hour presentation. Using the information presented, you will be able to evaluate which of the two hypotheses — fire-induced failure or controlled demolition — is more consistent with the evidence. Learning Objectives: Participants will be able to: 1. Describe the characteristics of building fires and the aspects of high-rise design that contribute to make fire-induced failure in steel-framed high-rise buildings a rare occurrence. 2. Recognize the distinct features associated with fire-induced failure and the distinct features associated with the procedure of controlled demolition. 3. Describe step-by-step the series of structural failures that the National Institute of Standards and Technology found to be the most likely cause of the collapse of World Trade Center Building 7. 4. Analyze the physical evidence and dynamics of Building 7’s collapse according to how consistent they are with the competing hypotheses of fire-induced failure and controlled demolition. For more information: visit https://RichardGage911.org​ ​ Content Managed by ContentSafe.co

Welcome to RichardGage911:Unleashed! 6 important questions for you, plus a bonus: Why didn't the airliners get intercepted on 9/11...as per standard protocol? Were hijackers really flying the planes? Was it actual civilian aircraft that hit the Twin Towers? Why was the Pentagon attacked? Were the plane-hijacking drills on the morning of 9/11 a coincidence? Did they cause the air traffic controllers confusion? Why did a “Joint Chiefs of Staff Instruction” modify the “Intercept Scramble Protocols" from two protocols into a single one? Bonus Question: “What was the hijacker’s name that brought WTC 7 down?” Robin Hordon, former Air Traffic Controller has some answers for you: Robin Hordon worked at the Air Route Traffic Control Center, located in Nashua, NH, 1970 - 1981. He was an FAA certified commercial pilot, and FAA certified Flight Instructor and certified Ground Instructor. In his 11-year FAA career as an Air Traffic Controller, Robin Hordon worked in the development of "procedures and airspace design", including military operations, and was part of the team which trained other Air Traffic Controllers and transitioned the FAA from its old broadband radar and simple flight data processors into the RDP (Radar Data Processing) and computerized radar displays. He was a Facility Training Instructor and was certified to create transcripts from audio tapes, to interpret radar data in tracking aircraft from computer files, and to analyze computer tracking data, all of which would combine to "tell the story"of air traffic incidents. He was also the main creator of the Boston Center Profile Descent and Metering Program for Boston Logan airport. While "on the boards", He personally worked one commercial airliner hijacking and assisted on another. Robin states, "I knew within hours of the attacks on 9/11/2001 that it was an inside job, based on my 11-year experience as an FAA Air Traffic Controller in the busy Northeast corridor, including hundreds of hours of training, briefings, air refuelings, low altitude bombing drills, being part of huge military exercises, daily military training exercises, interacting on a routine basis directly with NORAD radar personnel,and based on my own direct experience dealing with in-flight emergency situations, including two instances of hijacked commercial airliners. He notes, “It is important for people to understand that scrambling jet fighters to intercept aircraft showing the signs of experiencing "IN-FLIGHT EMERGENCIES" such as going off course without authorization, losing a transponder signal and/or losing radio contact is a common and routine task executed jointly between the FAA and NORAD controllers. The entire "national defense-first responder" intercept system has many highly-trained civilian and military personnel who are committed and well-trained to this task. FAA and NORAD continuously monitor our skies and fighter planes and pilots are on the ready 24/7 to handle these situations. Jet fighters typically intercept any suspect plane over the United States within 10 - 15 minutes of notification of a problem.” Be sure to ask him many questions during the livestream. For more information visit http://RichardGage911.org Download & listen to the .mp3 file: https://www.dropbox.com/preview/_RichardGage911%20-%20File%20Cabinet/Podcast/Guest%20Speakers/Robin%20Hordon/Robin%20Hordon%2C%20Former%20Air%20Traffic%20Controller_%20Was%209_11%20an%20Inside%20Job_%20A%20Dozen%20Clues%20from%20an%20FAA%20exper.mp3?context=search&role=personal Content Managed by ContentSafe.co

My Guest, is scientist Niels Harrit, PhD, the lead author of the groundbreaking 2009 peer-reviewed paper “Active Thermitic Materials in the World Trade Center Dust” published in the Bentham Open Chemical Physics Journal—documenting the discovery of energetic materials. He has lectured extensively all over the world on the World Trade Center evidence—as documented in the scientific paper and here dives deeper into the chemistry revealed in the WTC dust - as well as the carbon nanotubes in the lungs of the 9/11 first responders. What was found? Incendiaries (optimized for enormous heat; very slow)? Explosives (optimized for the most rapid gas expansion to knock things over)? Or propellants (optimized for propulsion at moderate speeds)? More importantly – what are the implications of these findings? Why are they found throughout the WTC dust? Who could be responsible?” Niels is the author of more than 60 published peer-reviewed papers on chemistry and was co-founder of the nanoscience center at The University of Copenhagen. He served as associate professor of chemistry at the University of Copenhagen from 1971 until his retirement in 2009. For more about the podcast RichardGage911:Unleashed! visit http://RichardGage911.org Content Managed by ContentSafe.co

[This is the improved video of the original posted on YT] My very first guest on my new video podcast is none other than Barbara Honegger! Prepare to have your beliefs/memory/understanding about the 9/11-related Anthrax Attacks blown wide open in this explosive interview! Barbara is an Investigative Researcher and Board Member for the Lawyers’ Committee for 9/11 Inquiry. She was a former Reagan White House and Dept. of Justice Official, and a 16-year DoD Senior Military Affairs Journalist. Did You know: Not just Vice President Cheney’s White House staff, but also President Bush and his entire White House and military entourage on-board Air Force One on the return flight to Washington on Sept. 11th were urgently put on the Anthrax antibiotic Cipro? The entire official New York City emergency response to the WTC attacks was executed out of a command center on a pier that had been set up for an anthrax attack exercise scheduled to begin on Sept. 12th? a command center that had been set up in the same months leading up to the attacks that explosives were being pre-placed in WTC 7? Don’t miss a second of this revelatory show that will cast an entirely new light on the events leading up to and on 9/11. It all happens tomorrow night Thursday at 6PM - livestreamed and archived at “RichardGage911” on YouTube, Facebook, LinkedIn, Twitter, Rumble, etc. Also, check on the website: https://RichardGage911.org See you then! Content Managed by ContentSafe.co

Are jet aircraft trails just condensation? Why are these trails lingering, spreading, andblocking the sun? Is the dimming of direct sunlight by aircraft dispersed-particles causing the dimming of sunlight? Is this a form of global warming mitigation? What is “Solar Radiation Management”? No matter what you think you know about this subject I promise you that you will be surprised and shocked by what you will learn. My guest on RichardGage911:Unleashed is Dane Wigington of GeoengineeringWatch.org. Dane is the lead researcher and administrator for the websitewww.geoengineeringwatch.org, and is the executive producer for the groundbreaking climate engineering documentary,“The Dimming”.He has devoted the last 20 years of his life to constant research on the issue of covert global climate engineering operations and the effort to expose and halt them. Dane discusses whether geoengineering operations are a reality or just speculation—theory, or conjecture. He investigates the up-close film footage taken at high altitude and inquires whether it reveals on/off aerosol dispersions from wing mounted nozzles on military tankers—and even retrofit commercial carrier aircraft which are leased by the DOD. He shares with us the data from atmospheric samples collected from a NOAA flying lab (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration) and seeks to provide tangible proof of climate engineering with elements, listed in US patents, being dispersed. Dane has a background in solar energy, was a former employee of Bechtel Power Corporation and was a licensed contractor in California and Arizona. His personal residence was featured as a cover article in the worlds largest renewable energy magazine, "Home Power". He actually owns his own wildlife preserve next to Lake Shasta in Northern California. Dane has appeared in numerous films and interviews in his effort to educate the public on the extremely dire environmental and health dangers we face from the ongoing global climate intervention operations. Visit RichardGage911.org for info & to support! Content Managed by ContentSafe.co

Do you really know what happened with the airplanes and the hijackers on 9/11? My guest today is Captain Dan Hanley, a retired civilian, military, and commercial airline pilot of 35 years who was illegally terminated in violation of RICO laws from United Airlines in 2003 for speaking out about his research on the 9/11 flights & hijackers. Dan is an American citizen who has resided in Islamabad, Pakistan for over 10 years. He currently serves as director and international public spokesperson for the global grassroots effort 9/11 Pilot Whistleblowers. The website is 911pilots.org and the YouTube channel is “911pilots”. Content Managed by ContentSafe.co

My guest is Sandra Jelmi - the most prolific volunteer in the 9/11 Truth Movement. Here is one who walks the talk. She doesn't even talk in fact - she walks. Actually, she runs, and she's been running for as many years as I have! Sandra is a trilingual Montrealer with a Bachelor in Translation who also lived in Vienna, Austria for years. Sandra joined the Translation Team of AE911Truth in 2010 and became its coordinator. In 2015, she also became a founding member of the International Truth Action Group, coordinating the various Truth groups outside the US who are based mostly in Europe. In January of 2021, she joined 911TAP, and became a board member in April, focusing her attention on organizing the 20th anniversary gathering in New York, which she attended in September. Certified as a Community Mediator and a Life Coach, she gravitates towards the psychology of communication, the importance of dialogue and a strong belief in the need for unity on the matter of 9/11 Truth, caring deeply about connecting the people, groups and organizations who have 9/11 Truth foremost in their hearts and minds. Content Managed by ContentSafe.co

My inspiring guest on RichardGage911:Unleashed! today was Kevin Ryan who will be discussing the: Demolition Access to the WTC and 9/11 Suspects Who could have placed explosives in the World Trade Center towers? To answer that question, we should first consider who had access to the buildings, specifically the areas of the buildings that would be relevant to a demolition operation, and when that access was available to them. Those who had access at the necessary times should be further considered in terms of their ability to obtain the necessary explosive technologies and expertise, their ability to be secretive, and the possibility that they could have benefited from the destruction of the WTC buildings or from the resulting War on Terror. The same questions can be asked about the 9/11 crimes overall, including the failure to defend the skies for instance. In this hour, we'll discuss some answers to these questions that will help us move closer to understanding who committed the crimes of 9/11. As Site Manager for the environmental testing division of Underwriters Laboratories (UL), Kevin Ryan began investigating the tragedy of September 11th, 2001. UL fired Kevin in 2004 for publicly asking questions about the company's fire resistance testing of the structural materials used to build the World Trade Center buildings as well as UL’s involvement in the WTC investigation being conducted by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). Since 2006, Ryan has been an-editor of the Journal of 9/11 Studies and a founding member of several action groups. He also served as a board director at Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth and co-authored several books and numerous peer-reviewed scientific articles on the subject. Ryan has given public presentations around the country and continues to do research into the crimes of 9/11 in order to help people come to a better understanding. For more info: https://RichardGage911.org Content Managed by ContentSafe.co