So How Many Real And Fake Rockets & Satellites & Space Junk Are Orbiting Earth Now
So How Many Rockets, Satellites, Space Junk Orbit the Earth Now From 1948 V-2 Rockets To Elon Musk Said SpaceX Satellite Are Really Balloon Hoax ? & NASA Greatest Real Deception Of Our Time. Inflatable Plastic Balloon Launched Satellite Today ! NASA Admits Rocket Launch Satellite Are Really Balloon Hoax And Do you have a hard time convincing your friends and loved ones that NASA is fake? So do we, so we've put together this video which contains the best proofs on the internet that NASA is taking our money and used to deceive the world about what the world is. Share this video to wake everyone up to the greatest deception of our time!..
P.S. Its funny no one can see any on million of pieces space junk orbiting earth at sunset or pass in front of a full moon at night ? and or as the large pieces of space junk pass by with in 2 to 5 miles from The International Space Station (ISS) is a 460-ton, permanently crewed platform orbiting 250 miles above Earth in the daylight hours with the earth as a lighted back ground and or a sunset lighted back ground to see all the space junk pass by in front of the lighted earth for all to see it ? day or night ? So is space junk real at all or is its all fake news from NASA or Elon Musk SpaceX Satellite Are All Really A True Balloon Hoax On The Peoples Of The World Again Ha Ha Ha Very Funny ?.
Why we can’t see space junk at sunset or during a full moon
Despite the staggering number of pieces of space junk orbiting Earth, we can’t visually observe them at sunset or during a full moon for several reasons:
Size and scale: Most space debris is tiny, ranging from a grain of sand to a basketball in size. At sunset or during a full moon, our eyes are adapted to detect larger objects, like clouds, mountains, or buildings, not tiny fragments of metal or plastic.
Orbital altitude: Space junk is typically in Low Earth Orbit (LEO), which is around 100-2,000 kilometers (62-1,243 miles) above the Earth’s surface. At this altitude, objects are too distant and too small to be visible to the naked eye, even with the aid of binoculars or telescopes.
Atmospheric distortion: The Earth’s atmosphere scatters and distorts light, making it difficult to resolve small, distant objects. Even if a piece of space junk were large enough to be visible, atmospheric conditions would likely obscure it.
Lack of contrast: Space junk blends in with the dark sky, making it hard to distinguish from the surrounding environment. In contrast, objects on the surface of the Earth or in the atmosphere have a clear silhouette against the sky, making them more visible.
No reflective surfaces: Unlike satellites, which often have reflective surfaces (e.g., solar panels), space junk typically lacks these features, making it even harder to spot.
Detection methods
While we can’t see space junk with our naked eyes, scientists and astronomers use specialized techniques to detect and track these objects:
Radar and lidar systems: These technologies use radio waves or laser pulses to bounce off space debris, allowing for precise tracking and measurement.
Optical telescopes: Ground-based telescopes equipped with sensitive cameras and spectrographs can detect faint, reflected sunlight or thermal emissions from space junk.
Space-based sensors: Satellites like the European Space Agency’s Debris Tracking System (DEBTEL) and NASA’s Orbital Debris Observatory (ODO) use sensors to detect and track space debris.
These methods enable us to monitor and study space junk, even if we can’t see it with our eyes at sunset or during a full moon.
Over the next few decades, Elon Musk is hoping to send 42,000 Starlink satellites to space. With these satellites, SpaceX hopes to bring high-speed satellite internet to every corner of the world. But experts worry it may come at a hefty cost, blocking astronomers' views and potentially space exploration for decades.
HOW MANY SATELLITES ARE UP THERE?
About 1,100 active satellites, both government and private. Plus there are about 2,600 ones that no longer work. Russia launched the first satellite, Sputnik 1, in 1957. The oldest one still in orbit, which is no longer functioning, was launched in 1958.
HOW BIG ARE THEY?
Size varies. Communication satellites can be as big as a small school bus and weigh up to 6 tons, the Federal Communications Commission says. Most weigh a few tons or less. Some that are used briefly are 4 inch cubes and weigh about 2 pounds.
WHAT EXACTLY DO THEY DO?
They have a wide variety of roles: GPS satellites aid navigation, others relay telephone or television signals, others aid in weather forecasting, national defense, science, and agriculture, as in monitoring crops and areas of drought. The Union of Concerned Scientists, a private organization that maintains a database of satellites, says about 60 percent are used for communications.
WHO OWNS THEM?
Governments large and small, and private companies. More than 50 countries own a satellite or a significant share in one, according to the Union of Concerned Scientists. There are 502 active satellites with a U.S. tie; 118 for Russia and 116 for China. Thailand has four satellites and shares in another, the scientist group says.
WHAT IF THEY STOP WORKING?
Old satellites can pose a risk for collisions with active ones, so there are rules and recommendations to avoid a buildup of junk in space. Satellites that fly below a certain height are supposed to be put in an orbit that will make them fall to Earth and burn up within 25 years. At high altitudes, they are to be boosted up to still higher orbits to get them out of the way.
Hmm....who knew?
Science Period 1 and 2 finished their reading assignment and we went over the information they collected from the text. We are reviewing the metric measuring system because as we study the Solar System we need to put Astronomical Units into perspective! We will be experimenting with measures to see if we could make a model of our Solar System, one that we can wrap our brain around....
Science Period 3 have received their Season's Unit Study Guide today. They should be finished with them by Friday after school with all the correct answers to study over the weekend. Test on Monday!
Real And Fake Rockets & Satellites & Space Junk In Orbit ?
Based on the provided search results, here’s a breakdown of the estimated number of real and fake rockets, satellites, and space junk orbiting Earth:
Trackable debris: According to the European Space Agency (ESA), there are approximately 32,750 objects tracked and cataloged by the Combined Force Space Component Command (CFSCC) at Vandenberg Space Force Base in California, U.S. These objects are observed and tracked by monitoring reflections from the sun and fed into a complex algorithm, which can determine an object’s size and distance from Earth.
Large debris: The Federation of American Scientists report estimates that there may be 170 million pieces of debris in orbit, with the vast majority too small to track due to limits in current technology. However, they recommend prioritizing the removal of large debris items (larger than 10 cm) for expedited cleanup.
Satellites: The same report states that there are approximately 14,450 satellites that have been launched since 1957, with over 6,300 successful rocket launches.
Fake satellites: There is no specific data on fake satellites, but it’s important to note that some objects may be misidentified as satellites or debris. The ESA’s catalog only includes confirmed human-made objects, so any fake or unidentified objects would not be included in this count.
Rocket stages and boosters: Many rocket stages and boosters are left in orbit after launching satellites, contributing to the overall debris population. The exact number is difficult to estimate, but it’s likely in the tens of thousands.
To summarize:
Trackable debris: approximately 32,750 objects
Large debris: potentially hundreds of thousands to millions (larger than 10 cm)
Satellites: approximately 14,450 launched since 1957
Fake satellites: unknown (but likely zero or negligible)
Rocket stages and boosters: tens of thousands (estimated)
Keep in mind that these numbers are estimates and may vary depending on the source and methodology used. The actual number of space junk and satellites in orbit is likely higher than reported, as many small objects and debris fragments are too small to track or detect.
Is The Earth Actually Flat ? Open Your Mind Now ! Yes Elon Musk & NASA Are Lying To You - https://rumble.com/v637epz-is-the-earth-actually-flat-open-your-mind-now-yes-elon-musk-and-nasa-are-ly.html
Yes NASA & Elon Musk And Other's Said "You Can Tell It's Real Because It's Looks So Fake" SpaceX Rocket & 1000s Fake N.A.S.A. Space Launched. NASA Admits Its All Fake National Aeronautics and Space Administration On July 29, 1958, President Dwight D. Eisenhower signed the National Aeronautics and Space Act into law, establishing the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), a civilian agency responsible for coordinating America's activities in space.
Elon Musk SpaceX Satellite Are Really Balloon Hoax & Greatest Deception Of Our Time - https://rumble.com/v639ol2-elon-musk-spacex-satellite-are-really-balloon-hoax-and-greatest-deception-o.html
So Elon Musk Said SpaceX Satellite Are Really Balloon Hoax ? & NASA Greatest Real Deception Of Our Time. Inflatable Plastic Balloon Launched Satellite Today ! NASA Admits Rocket Launch Satellite Are Really Balloon Hoax And Do you have a hard time convincing your friends and loved ones that NASA is fake?
Most passenger aircraft fly at altitudes of 37 000 to 41 000 ft (11 to 12.5 km) and some ever higher. Despite their size, seeing the aircraft with the naked eye in the day at that altitude is not possible. If they do not show contrails (white vapor trails) one would have difficulty to see them at their cruising altitude. Regarding the size of the satellites: max length = 5.6m and 2.8 m wide, compared to the A380 = Length, 72.73 m ; Wingspan, 79.80 m.
Therefore, seeing the starlink satellites in the day I would say is not possible. Seeing them at night as have, is purely due to the reflection of light at that altitude. If you watch the video you would notice that the satellites travel through the cloud base and at times lower than the clouds.
These types of clouds at 550km, I wonder. The Height of Clouds Level Polar Region Tropical Region High Clouds 10,000-25,000 feet (3-8 km) 20,000-60,000 feet (6-18 km) Mid Clouds 6,500-13,000 feet (2-4 km) 6,500-25,000 feet (2-8 km) Low Clouds Surface-6,500 feet (0-2 km) Surface-6,500 feet (0-2 km) Thus this is a load of bull sh*t but thanks for amusing us.
Remember to enjoy the spectacle responsibly and respectfully, acknowledging the technological achievement behind this celestial display. Happy stargazing!
Satellite Orbital Speed
Based on the provided search results, there is no mention of a satellite orbiting at an altitude of 4 miles (6.4 kilometers) above the Earth’s surface. Satellites typically operate in Low Earth Orbit (LEO) at altitudes ranging from 100 to 1,200 miles (160 to 1,930 kilometers), or in Geostationary Orbit (GEO) at an altitude of approximately 22,236 miles (35,786 kilometers) above the equator.
At an altitude of 4 miles (6.4 kilometers), an object would not be in orbit around the Earth. Instead, it would likely experience intense atmospheric drag and rapidly decay, falling back to the surface.
To provide a meaningful answer, I’ll assume you meant to ask about satellites in LEO, which typically operate at altitudes above 100 miles (160 kilometers). According to the search results, satellites in LEO have a mean orbital velocity of approximately 7.8 km/s (4.8 mi/s), which translates to 28,000 km/h (17,000 mph).
However, this velocity is not applicable to an altitude of 4 miles (6.4 kilometers), as satellites do not operate at such a low altitude. To maintain an orbit at an altitude of 4 miles, an object would need to have a significantly higher velocity than what’s required for LEO, as it would need to counteract the intense atmospheric drag and gravity at such a low altitude.
Unfortunately, there is no specific information available on the required velocity for an object to maintain an orbit at an altitude of 4 miles. Such an orbit is not feasible with current technology and would likely require significant advances in propulsion and materials science.
Orbital Velocity and Altitude
A rocket must accelerate to at least 25,039 mph (40,320 kph) to completely escape Earth's gravity and fly off into space (for more on escape velocity, visit this article at NASA).
Earth's escape velocity is much greater than what's required to place an Earth satellite in orbit. With satellites, the object is not to escape Earth's gravity, but to balance it. Orbital velocity is the velocity needed to achieve balance between gravity's pull on the satellite and the inertia of the satellite's motion -- the satellite's tendency to keep going. This is approximately 17,000 mph (27,359 kph) at an altitude of 150 miles (242 kilometers). Without gravity, the satellite's inertia would carry it off into space. Even with gravity, if the intended satellite goes too fast, it will eventually fly away. On the other hand, if the satellite goes too slowly, gravity will pull it back to Earth. At the correct orbital velocity, gravity exactly balances the satellite's inertia, pulling down toward Earth's center just enough to keep the path of the satellite curving like Earth's curved surface, rather than flying off in a straight line.
The orbital velocity of the satellite depends on its altitude above Earth. The nearer to Earth, the faster the required orbital velocity. At an altitude of 124 miles (200 kilometers), the required orbital velocity is a little more than 17,000 mph (about 27,400 kph). To maintain an orbit that is 22,223 miles (35,786 kilometers) above Earth, the satellite must orbit at a speed of about 7,000 mph (11,300 kph). That orbital speed and distance permit the satellite to make one revolution in 24 hours. Since Earth also rotates once in 24 hours, a satellite at 22,223 miles altitude stays in a fixed position relative to a point on Earth's surface. Because the satellite stays right over the same spot all the time, this kind of orbit is called "geostationary." Geostationary orbits are ideal for weather satellites and communications satellites.
In general, the higher the orbit, the longer the satellite can stay in orbit. At lower altitudes, a satellite runs into traces of Earth's atmosphere, which creates drag. The drag causes the orbit to decay until the satellite falls back into the atmosphere and burns up. At higher altitudes, where the vacuum of space is nearly complete, there is almost no drag and a satellite like the moon can stay in orbit for centuries.
Yes NASA & Elon Musk And Other's Said "You Can Tell It's Real Because It's Looks So Fake" SpaceX Rocket & 1000s Fake N.A.S.A. Space Launched. NASA Admits Its All Fake National Aeronautics and Space Administration On July 29, 1958, President Dwight D. Eisenhower signed the National Aeronautics and Space Act into law, establishing the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), a civilian agency responsible for coordinating America's activities in space.
The Real International Space Station Program brings together international flight crews, multiple launch vehicles, globally distributed launch and flight operations, training, engineering, and development facilities, communications networks, and the international scientific research community.
The International Space Station (ISS) is a 460-ton, permanently crewed platform orbiting 250 miles above Earth. It took 10 years and more than 30 missions to assemble, resulting in unprecedented scientific and engineering collaboration among five space agencies representing 15 countries.
Elon Musk Said "You Can Tell It's Real Because It Looks So Fake" SpaceX Launched - https://rumble.com/v613fsh-elon-musk-said-you-can-tell-its-real-because-it-looks-so-fake-spacex-launch.html
Why, in some of the videos of NASA's astronauts in space, are there air bubbles that rise from their suit? The "air bubbles" seen in some videos of NASA's astronauts in space are often not actually air bubbles, but rather water droplets. These droplets can form from sweat, drinking water, or other liquids that may have escaped from the astronaut's suit or equipment. In the microgravity environment of space, these droplets can appear to move in unexpected ways, including rising up from the astronaut's suit due to surface tension and other forces. It's important to note that these droplets do not indicate the presence of air or water in space suits, as space suits are designed to keep astronauts safe in the vacuum of space.
What Spy Satellites Can See From Space Section 702 Intelligence Surveillance Act - https://rumble.com/v4yxrt6-what-spy-satellites-can-see-from-space-section-702-intelligence-surveillanc.html
US Warrantless Spy Satellites Surveillance Of The American People's Under Section 702 Of The Foreign And Domestic Intelligence Surveillance And Spying Act. ACLU Statement on Congress Passing Bill that Massively Expands the Government’s Power to Spy on Americans Without a Warrant. This bill would reauthorize Section 702 surveillance for two more years without any of the necessary reforms to protect Americans’ civil liberties.
How come these documentaries never go into detail about the Van Allen Belts? Like what kind of radiation? What about this radiation is lethal and will not allow us to go through it? They just make a statement and do not back it up. As far as the flag moving bit, I find it hard to believe that we would go into such intricate detail to make this look credible and overlook a majorly noticeable thing like that. As far as the footage from inside the craft, well they didn't prove or disprove anything, just formed an opinion and tried to pass it as proof. I'm not convinced we didn't go, I'm also not saying we did without a doubt goto the Moon, but this documentary provided a very weak argument.
The House of Representatives passed a bill today that will reauthorize Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act for two years, expand the federal government’s power to secretly spy on Americans without a warrant, and create a new form of “extreme vetting” of people traveling to the United States.
Section 702 of the US Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA), a warrantless surveillance law that underpins two massive internet and telephone monitoring programs, will expire on December 31, 2017, unless Congress renews it. The law enables the National Security Agency, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, and other US bodies to gather and/or search private communications without a warrant. This surveillance affects people both within the United States and in other countries.
"We saw that on the same thing with the legislation that got pushed after the Snowden disclosures," he said, referring to U.S. intelligence contractor Edward Snowden's revelations that the National Security Agency was secretly sweeping up millions' of Americans' phone call records and lying about it. Outraged lawmakers moved to shut it down, only to be told by the government that "it's essential, it's important, it would be a disaster for national security if we stopped the global bulk collection authority," Laperruque said. Congress pulled the plug on bulk collection anyway, "and lo and behold the sky didn't fall," he said.
So NASA Decades Old Moon Landing Hoax Is When Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin took their first steps on the moon in July 1969, the world was suddenly split into two categories – those who believe the Apollo 11 landings, and those who don’t. We’ll investigate both sides of this debate – in fact 52% of the British public still believe the landings were an elaborate hoax designed to trump Russia in the space race!
In this show we’ll search for a definitive answer by recreating the moon landing for ourselves, testing the various competing theories against each other. Featuring interviews with leading experts, conspiracy theorists, archive material and highly detailed reconstructions of the landing, we put this debate to bed once and for all.
NASA faked the historic Apollo 11 Moon landing footage with the help of Hollywood veteran director Stanley Kubrick, book author and filmmaker Jay Weidner has shockingly claimed. When NASA astronauts Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin landed on the Moon on April 20, 1969, more than 500 million watched around the globe with bated breath. But the monumental moment in the history of mankind is often overshadowed by conspiracy theories claiming the Moon landing was faked. As the 50th anniversary of the Moon landing approaches, the number of conspiracist questioning NASA’s official version of events is on the rise. Mr Weidner, who directed the documentary Kubrick's Odyssey, has astonishingly claimed footage of the Apollo 11 landing was directed by Mr Kubrick. However, even more surprisingly, the filmmaker said NASA did go to the Moon – but the footage broadcast around the world was a hoax.
Stanley Kubrick Fake Apollo 11 Moon Landing Was A Hoax By The U.S.A. Government - https://rumble.com/v2s6afk-stanley-kubrick-fake-apollo-11-moon-landing-was-a-hoax-by-the-u.s.a.-govern.html
NASA faked the historic Apollo 11 Moon landing footage with the help of Hollywood veteran director Stanley Kubrick, book author and filmmaker Jay Weidner has shockingly claimed.
Flat Earth Trilogy True World & Learning Curve And Epic Deception Complete Video - https://rumble.com/v4c13d8-flat-earth-trilogy-true-world-and-learning-curve-and-epic-deception-complet.html
Flat Earth Trilogy So I'm Not Saying The Earth Is Flat Or Anything... But This Is Very Interesting Evidence and I learned a lot, just like I learned a lot with the heliocentric model and the view of the solar system. Both models are useful for purposes of history and knowledge. Biblical Flat Earth Exposing a World of Lies, Everything you know is Wrong.
“I think that physicists need to be more involved,” he says. “There’s really no excuse for us to just sit back and laugh at them. Because while we’re laughing, they are recruiting people to believe these crazy things.”
81 Government & Affiliate Documents that admit Flat Earth It's A PDF Download.
If a scientific conspiracy theory is funny, that doesn’t mean it’s a joke at all.
In astronomy, the perception that Earth is flat leads to the deduction that it must actually be flat; the antimoon, NASA conspiracy and all the rest are just rationalizations for how that might work in practice.
Those details make the flat-earthers' theory so elaborately absurd it sounds like a joke, but many of its supporters genuinely consider it a more plausible model of astronomy than the one found in textbooks. In short, they aren't kidding.
For the flat-earther convinced that all these countries put aside their political tensions in order to maintain the fiction of a spherical Earth, there are also ways to check on the planet's shape with one's own eyes. One of the simplest is to go to a harbor and watch the ships depart. As a ship disappears over the horizon, the bottom of the ship will go first, followed gradually by the mast. But if you zoom in with a 100 time zoom or a high power telescope you will see the whole ship again 20 to 30 miles away from you still in the photo... so yes the earth is flat.
NASA Admits Apollo 11 Moon Landing is a Hoax After Mentions Space Is Not Real - https://rumble.com/v3depjq-nasa-admits-apollo-11-moon-landing-is-a-hoax-after-mentions-space-is-not-re.html
NASA Admits Apollo 11 Moon Landing is a Hoax in 1976 this was the fifth crewed mission of NASA's Apollo program. All files and computer tapes are now missing and launched by a Saturn V rocket from Kennedy Space Center on Merritt Island, Florida, on July 16, 1969. The Apollo spacecraft had three parts: a command module with a cabin for the three astronauts, a service module that supported the command module with propulsion, electrical power, oxygen, and water, and a lunar module that had two stages a descent stage for landing on the Moon and an ascent stage to place the astronauts back into lunar orbit. Commander Neil Armstrong and lunar module pilot Buzz Aldrin landed the Apollo Lunar Module Eagle on July 20, 1969, at 20:17 UTC, and Armstrong became the first person to step onto the Moon's surface six hours and 39 minutes later, on July 21 at 02:56 UTC. All three astronauts spent 8 days, 3 hours, 18 minutes, and 35 seconds in space and traveled a total of 953,054 miles.
NASA Admits Rocket Launch Satellite Are Really Balloon Hoax Chinese Spy Balloon - https://rumble.com/v3dgrpn-nasa-admits-rocket-launch-satellite-are-really-balloon-hoax-chinese-spy-bal.html
NASA Admits Rocket Launch Satellite Are Really Balloon Hoax And Do you have a hard time convincing your friends and loved ones that NASA is fake? So do we, so we've put together this video which contains the best proofs on the internet that NASA is taking our money and used to deceive the world about what the world is. Share this video to wake everyone up to the greatest deception of our time!
NASA Admits Fake International Space Station A Global World Wide Satellite Hoax - https://rumble.com/v3dm5uj-nasa-admits-fake-international-space-station-a-global-world-wide-satellite-.html
NASA Admits Its All Fake National Aeronautics and Space Administration On July 29, 1958, President Dwight D. Eisenhower signed the National Aeronautics and Space Act into law, establishing the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), a civilian agency responsible for coordinating America's activities in space. The agency absorbed the earlier National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics (NACA), which was a U.S. federal agency founded on March 3, 1915, to undertake, promote, and institutionalize aeronautical research. NASA has since sponsored space expeditions, both human and mechanical, that have yielded vital information about the solar system and universe. During the 1960s, NASA started its space science and interplanetary probe program, with the Mariner program being its flagship program, launching probes to Venus, Mars, and Mercury in the 1960s. The Jet Propulsion Laboratory was the lead NASA center for robotic interplanetary exploration, making significant discoveries about the inner planets.
NASA Admits Faking Space Part 1 The Space Program Is Faked Yes It's A Conspiracy - https://rumble.com/v3dqlbc-nasa-admits-faking-space-part-1-the-space-program-is-faked-yes-its-a-conspi.html
NASA Admits Faking Space Part 1 The Space Program and shows provable deception in the space program. NASA is a corrupt government organization. It gets worse. NASA was started to create the illusion of going into so-called (non-existent) "outer space". The truth is that no one or nothing has ever been to the fantasy known as "outer space".
NASA has successfully launched 166 crewed flights, but three have ended in failure, causing the deaths of seventeen crew members in total: Apollo 1, STS-51-L (the Challenger disaster) killed seven crew members in 1986, and STS-107 (the Columbia disaster) killed seven more in 2003. The accomplishments of Apollo are among humankind's greatest, with six missions landing men on the moon between 1969 and 1972, the only time humans have ventured onto another celestial body. However, the program was marred by NASA's first tragedy on the ground (Apollo 1) and a near tragedy in space (Apollo 13).
NASA Admits Faking Space Part 2 Bonus Proof Stephen Hawking Is A Fraud Conspiracy - https://rumble.com/v3dssxw-nasa-admits-faking-space-part-2-bonus-proof-stephen-hawking-is-a-fraud-cons.html
NASA Admits Faking Space Part 2 The Space Program and shows provable deception in the space program. NASA is a corrupt government organization. It gets worse. NASA was started to create the illusion of going into so-called (non-existent) "outer space". The truth is that no one or nothing has ever been to the fantasy known as "outer space".
NASA Admits To Best Fails And NASA Fraud Compilation Unrefuted Proof Of Wires - https://rumble.com/v3dxnnb-nasa-admits-to-best-fails-and-nasa-fraud-compilation-unrefuted-proof-of-wir.html
There's a lot more proof of deception out there, but I wanted to compile the most obvious ones and keep them in one place. I'm discovering that a lot of the original links to such footage are no longer working as they are being deleted. The footage is from space channels, so they aren't just targeting truther channels with the deletion of entire channels. I will post the most up to date links, but some of the originals are gone.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moon_landing_conspiracy_theories
One giant ... lie? Why so many people still think the moon landings were faked.
https://drive.proton.me/urls/M2ADCKGT60#i17MPT9u7pOn
Real ISS Space Station Maniac Conspiracy Theorists Think It Is Actually Underwater ! - https://rumble.com/v4c47q9-real-iss-space-station-maniac-conspiracy-theorists-think-it-is-actually-und.html
The Real International Space Station Program brings together international flight crews, multiple launch vehicles, globally distributed launch and flight operations, training, engineering, and development facilities, communications networks, and the international scientific research community. The International Space Station (ISS) is a 460-ton, permanently crewed platform orbiting 250 miles above Earth. It took 10 years and more than 30 missions to assemble, resulting in unprecedented scientific and engineering collaboration among five space agencies representing 15 countries.
Real Hubble Telescope Repair Mission Is Not Real Conspiracy Theorists NASA-SOFIA - https://rumble.com/v4chck3-real-hubble-telescope-repair-mission-is-not-real-conspiracy-theorists-nasa-.html
So Is The Real Hubble Telescope Repair Mission True Or Is It Not Real ? Embark on an extraordinary journey through the captivating saga of the Under Water Hubble Space Telescope Pool ?, from its ambitious launch to the critical repairs in fake space. Explore the story of a tiny flaw that led to blurred images and the heroic efforts of astronauts to rescue this iconic telescope. It's a remarkable tale of human ingenuity, unwavering perseverance, and the relentless quest to unravel the universe's deepest mysteries.
Real Hubble Telescope Conspiracy Theorists Think It's Actually NASA-SOFIA Airplane - https://rumble.com/v4cmncu-real-hubble-telescope-conspiracy-theorists-think-its-actually-nasa-sofia-ai.html
Real Hubble Telescope Conspiracy Theorists Think Why is it that NASA has a plane called SOFIA in the sky with a telescope that can see much more into space than the famously known Hubble? Let’s start with Hubble: The NASA/ESA Hubble Space Telescope is a space telescope (surprise!) in low-Earth orbit, launched into space in 1990 - it is a cooperation between NASA and the European Space Agency ESA. It has a 2.4-metre mirror and instruments to observe the Universe in the ultraviolet, the optical and the near infrared. Using Hubble astronomers were able to peer into the distant Universe - much further than with any other telescope.
Secret Behind Hubble's 100 Incredible Gorgeous Space Photoshop Extraordinary Etc. - https://rumble.com/v4cqa7i-secret-behind-hubbles-100-incredible-gorgeous-space-photoshop-extraordinary.html
The Secret Behind All Of NASA's Gorgeous Space Photos Glowing, Whirling, Pinwheeling Wonder That Is The Spiral Galaxy! Bursts of gas & cosmic dust form one of the most iconic forms of Galaxies. Here's a look at a beautiful spiral galaxy, located 30 million light-years away in the constellation From the glossy, high-res photos, you'd think outer space is a diamond-studded smear of billowing clouds, mixing together like slick oil and rain in a swirling gutter with glass shards and flecks of concrete.
All 6 Apollo Landing Sites Through My Telescope Moon Landing Was A Hoax U.S.A. - https://rumble.com/v4cshlc-all-6-apollo-landing-sites-through-my-telescope-moon-landing-was-a-hoax-u.s.html
All 6 Apollo Landing Sites Evidence NASA Faked Apollo Moon Landing Hoax and Since its founding in 1958, NASA has pushed the boundaries of scientific and technical limits to explore the unknown for all the citizens of our planet. Discover the history of our human spaceflight, science, technology, and aeronautics programs.
Evidence NASA Faked Apollo Moon Landing Hoax How They Do It Complete Video - https://rumble.com/v48btzf-evidence-nasa-faked-apollo-moon-landing-hoax-how-they-do-it-complete-video.html
Evidence NASA Faked Apollo Moon Landing Hoax and Since its founding in 1958, NASA has pushed the boundaries of scientific and technical limits to explore the unknown for all the citizens of our planet. Discover the history of our human spaceflight, science, technology, and aeronautics programs.
Sorry Antarctica We're Closed Our Hidden Flat Earth This Area Is As Big As U.S.A. - https://rumble.com/v3e0jrw-sorry-antarctica-were-closed-our-hidden-flat-earth-this-area-is-as-big-as-u.html
Sorry Antarctica We're Closed Our Hidden Flat Earth This Area Admiral Byrd: “An Area As Big As The United States on the Other Side of the South Pole” According most flat earthers, there’s no such thing as the continent of Antarctica. In their imagination, Antarctica is not a continent, but a long ice wall enclosing the Earth. Without having anything to prove that assumption, they look anywhere for any quote they can mine and stumbled into this quote by Admiral Byrd “Strangely enough, there is left in the world today, an area as big as the United States, that’s never been seen by a human being. And that’s beyond the pole, on the other side of the south pole from Little America.”
Magnetic Stone Rupes Nigra Huge Magnetic Rock 180km In Diameter At North Pole - https://rumble.com/v3e220t-magnetic-stone-rupes-nigra-huge-magnetic-rock-180km-in-diameter-at-north-po.html
This Is A Very Rare And Top Secrets Real Video From M.I.R. Space Station of the North Pole Septentrionalium Terrarum descriptio - Magnetic Stone The Rupes Nigra ("Black Rock") 1595 First Edition Mercator Map of the Arctic (1st Map of the North Pole) Hello my friends. this is an ancient map of the north pole. The North Pole as a magnetic mountain goes back at least to Roman times. the North Pole as a magnetic mountain surrounded by a circular continent divided by four powerful rivers from maps Martin Behaim's 1492 globe shows, at the arctic pole there is a high magnetic rock, thirty-three German miles in circumference. A surging sea surrounds this rock, as if the water were discharged downward from a vase through an opening. Around it are islands, two of which are inhabited."
Why Huge Magnetic Rock North Pole Magnetic Stone An Arctic Timeline 1496-1962 - https://rumble.com/v3e30gf-why-huge-magnetic-rock-north-pole-magnetic-stone-an-arctic-timeline-1496-19.html
Why Huge Magnetic Rock North Pole Septentrionalium Terrarum descriptio - Magnetic Stone The Rupes Nigra ("Black Rock") 1595 First Edition Mercator Map of the Arctic (1st Map of the North Pole) Hello my friends. this is an ancient map of the north pole. The North Pole as a magnetic mountain goes back at least to Roman times. the North Pole as a magnetic mountain surrounded by a circular continent divided by four powerful rivers from maps Martin Behaim's 1492 globe shows, at the arctic pole there is a high magnetic rock, thirty-three German miles in circumference. A surging sea surrounds this rock, as if the water were discharged downward from a vase through an opening. Around it are islands, two of which are inhabited."
Global History Of Communications and Satellite Hoax History Of Communications - https://rumble.com/v29oj62-global-history-of-communications-and-satellite-hoax-history-of-communicatio.html
The Earth’s temperature range in Fahrenheit is from 3,600 degrees Fahrenheit (2,000 degrees Celsius) in the uppermost atmosphere to a global average temperature of around 59 degrees Fahrenheit (15 degrees Celsius) near the surface.
The Satellite Melting Points Is ? ? ? - So 2000 Celsius = Is 3632 Fahrenheit and Layers of Atmosphere & High Radiation and Satellite Radiation Melting Points.
How to convert Celsius to Fahrenheit ? 0 degrees Celsius is equal to 32 degrees Fahrenheit: 0 °C = 32 °F The temperature T in degrees Fahrenheit (°F) is equal to the temperature T in degrees Celsius (°C) times 9/5 plus 32, that conversion formula.
Welcome to the Satellite Hoax Man - Excellent Music an Video from Flat Earth Man - https://rumble.com/v29orjq-welcome-to-the-satellite-hoax-man-excellent-music-an-video-from-flat-earth-.html
Welcome to the Satellite Hoax is an English language song and is sung by conspiracy music guru. Welcome to the Satellite Hoax, from the album Flat Earth Man, was released in the year 2018. The duration of the song is 5:48.
Many of the technologies that we assume are space based, are in reality ground based systems. We've had the ability for a very long time to send messages across vast distances. We are not using space based equipment for the internet, nor for telecommunications, but we do use fiber optic and transatlantic cables, massive RF Towers, and bounce signals off of the atmosphere like with HAM radio signals. Space is fake, satellites are a hoax, and not what we are told they are. Nasa is a fraud of the highest order.
Excellent & entertaining video Thoroughly enjoyed this video Question to Flat Earthers If we follow your flat earth model, who has the further distance from Earth the Sun or the Moon? If the Sun is far from Earth than the Moon, will you please explain the Lunar Eclipse phenomenon? If the Moon is far from Earth than the Sun, will you please explain the Solar Eclipse occurrence? If the Sun and the Moon have equal distance from Earth, why they didn’t collide?
We can leave such persons to ponder the swirling of the water in their sinks and bathtubs—swirling that reverses direction when we cross the equator.
https://samuel-lereah.com/articles/Physics/flat-vs-round-earth
According to some UFO conspiracists, the Black Knight is an artificial satellite of extraterrestrial origin that has orbited Earth for approximately 13,000 years.
Flat Earth Vs. Round Earth Vs. Black Knight Satellite Vs. Fermi Paradox The Great Debate - https://rumble.com/v3tkujr-flat-earth-vs.-round-earth-vs.-black-knight-satellite-vs.-fermi-paradox-the.html
Who’s Telling Truth About The Firmament On Earth Quran Or Bible Or Waters Above - https://rumble.com/v3nxzhl-whos-telling-truth-about-the-firmament-on-earth-quran-or-bible-or-waters-ab.html
Who’s Telling Truth About The Firmament On Earth And Sun Moon Luminaries Part 2 - https://rumble.com/v3o0bk9-whos-telling-truth-about-the-firmament-on-earth-and-sun-moon-luminaries-par.html
Ultimate Field Guide 82 Extraterrestrial Species Iceberg Explained Alleged Alien Races
In the story of the abduction and encounters with alien beings or humanoids in the history of ufology, there are, as reported by the various reports of the various police and military who are interested in the subject, lists of different types of beings who should represent various civilizations do not belong to the human, who were either vengoino still in touch with people on our planet.
Taboo Conspiracy Of Nature's True Flat Earth Real Time 40 Schemes From N.A.S.A.
Taboo Conspiracy and Other Video's Removed by ? Those channels have since been silenced by ? the other censor's and Nazis at Alphabet. lot's of people have provides time and time again, the very best proofs of our flat world, tests and experiments that completely debunk the heliocentric fantasy, and is also personally responsible for exposing the fakery in every supposed 24/7 sun in Antarctica video. He has certainly opened hundreds of thousands of people’s eyes to our false reality and for that, I’m proud to share his work here at new world order year zero.
Flat Earth 21 Questions And Answers Proving Stranger's Guide And Course Flat Earth
Proving Stranger's Guide And Course Flat Earth A comprehensive beginners course that thoroughly explains the answers to 21 of the most frequently asked questions about flat earth. Journey through the list from beginning to end while all the "loose ends" are tied up by the time it's over. Share with you friends, family and loved ones. The #earth is most definitely #flat and it is important for us to understand.
Stanley Kubrick Fake Apollo 11 Moon Landing Was A Hoax By The U.S.A. Government
NASA faked the historic Apollo 11 Moon landing footage with the help of Hollywood veteran director Stanley Kubrick, book author and filmmaker Jay Weidner has shockingly claimed. When NASA astronauts Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin landed on the Moon on April 20, 1969, more than 500 million watched around the globe with bated breath. But the monumental moment in the history of mankind is often overshadowed by conspiracy theories claiming the Moon landing was faked. As the 50th anniversary of the Moon landing approaches, the number of conspiracist questioning NASA’s official version of events is on the rise. Mr Weidner, who directed the documentary Kubrick's Odyssey, has astonishingly claimed footage of the Apollo 11 landing was directed by Mr Kubrick. However, even more surprisingly, the filmmaker said NASA did go to the Moon – but the footage broadcast around the world was a hoax.
NASA Admits Fake International Space Station A Global World Wide Satellite Hoax
Flat Earth Vs. Round Earth 8 Ways Life Would Get Weird On A Flat Earth Conspiracy
Proofs Earth Is Not A Spinning Ball What The Hell Happened 200 Times Collection
Proofs Earth Is Not A Spinning Ball When a photo of spherical Earth is pointed out to flat-earthers, they will dismiss it as CGI in the blink of an eye; even if they haven’t done any analysis at all. They do this because their belief in flat-Earth is not evidence-based, and any evidence contrary to their beliefs needs to be invalidated no matter how. They are so used to doing it, and sometimes they become confused by it themselves, to the point that they would take the slightest hint of digital manipulation of any picture of the Earth as evidence of the flat Earth.
Flat Earth 101 Channel - Episode 14 - Eclipse Of Fantasy - (Gerhana Fantasi)
This is the number 1 question? - Flat Earthers hear, why would anyone go through this elaborate hoax? - The powers that be want to hide the truth of our existence at all costs as they do not want to have anyone/anything else in higher power than themselves. The majority of people believe they are descendants.
NASA Admits Faking Space Part 1 The Space Program Is Faked Yes It's A Conspiracy
NASA Admits Faking Space Part 1 The Space Program and shows provable deception in the space program. NASA is a corrupt government organization. It gets worse. NASA was started to create the illusion of going into so-called (non-existent) "outer space". The truth is that no one or nothing has ever been to the fantasy known as "outer space".
NASA Admits Faking Space Part 2 Bonus Proof Stephen Hawking Is A Fraud Conspiracy
NASA Admits Faking Space Part 2 The Space Program and shows provable deception in the space program. NASA is a corrupt government organization. It gets worse. NASA was started to create the illusion of going into so-called (non-existent) "outer space". The truth is that no one or nothing has ever been to the fantasy known as "outer space".
After Atomic World War 3 Is Over Creation Of The Humanoids AI Robots Futura Lives
What would happen to planet earth if the human race were to suddenly disappear forever? Would ecosystems thrive? What remnants of our industrialized world would survive? What would crumble fastest? Life After People is a television series on which scientists, structural engineers, and other experts speculate about what might become of Earth should humanity instantly disappear.
Flat Earth Trilogy True World & Learning Curve And Epic Deception Complete Video - https://rumble.com/v4c13d8-flat-earth-trilogy-true-world-and-learning-curve-and-epic-deception-complet.html
Flat Earth Trilogy So I'm Not Saying The Earth Is Flat Or Anything. But This Is Very Interesting Evidence and I learned a lot, just like I learned a lot with the heliocentric model.
The number of pics allegedly taken by the Apollo astronauts during Extra Vehicular Activity on the moon were carefully studied by this photographic analyst for more than three years and when that number was divided by the documented hours and minutes each mission spent doing EVAs on the moon, the obvious conclusion was that it could not have been done. The photo specialist states:
Here is my actual count of EVA photos of the six missions:
Apollo 11........... 121
Apollo 12........... 504
Apollo 14........... 374
Apollo 15..........1021
Apollo 16..........1765
Apollo 17..........1986
So 12 astronauts while on the Moon's surface took a TOTAL of 5771 exposures.
https://drive.proton.me/urls/M2ADCKGT60#i17MPT9u7pOn
That seemed excessively large to me, considering that their TIME on the lunar surface was limited, and the astronauts. Unlike the number of photos, this information is readily available:
Apollo 11........1 EVA .....2 hours, 31 minutes......(151 minutes)
Apollo 12........2 EVAs.....7 hours, 50 minutes......(470 minutes)
Apollo 14........2 EVAs.....9 hours, 25 minutes......(565 minutes)
Apollo 15........3 EVAs...18 hours, 30 minutes....(1110 minutes)
Apollo 16........3 EVAs...20 hours, 14 minutes....(1214 minutes)
Apollo 17........3 EVAs...22 hours, 04 minutes....(1324 minutes)
Total minutes on the Moon amounted to 4834 minutes.
Total number of photographs taken was 5771 photos.
He goes on to break it down by mission:
Apollo 11........one photo every 15 seconds
Apollo 12........one photo every 27 seconds
Apollo 14........one photo every 62 seconds
Apollo 15........one photo every 44 seconds
Apollo 16........one photo every 29 seconds
Apollo 17........one photo every 26 seconds
So you decide. Given all the facts, was it possible to take that many photos in so short a time?
Any professional photographer will tell you it cannot be done. Virtually every photo was a different scene or in a different place, requiring travel. As much as 30 miles travel was required to reach some of the photo sites.
Global History Of Communications and Satellite Hoax History Of Communications - https://rumble.com/v29oj62-global-history-of-communications-and-satellite-hoax-history-of-communicatio.html
The Earth’s temperature range in Fahrenheit is from 3,600 degrees Fahrenheit (2,000 degrees Celsius) in the uppermost atmosphere to a global average temperature of around 59 degrees Fahrenheit (15 degrees Celsius) near the surface.
The Satellite Melting Points Is ? ? ? - So 2000 Celsius = Is 3632 Fahrenheit and Layers of Atmosphere & High Radiation and Satellite Radiation Melting Points.
How to convert Celsius to Fahrenheit ? 0 degrees Celsius is equal to 32 degrees Fahrenheit: 0 °C = 32 °F The temperature T in degrees Fahrenheit (°F) is equal to the temperature T in degrees Celsius (°C) times 9/5 plus 32, that conversion formula.
Celsius Celsius, also known as centigrade, is a unit of measurement for temperature. The degree Celsius (symbol: °C) can refer to a specific temperature on the Celsius scale as well as a unit to indicate a temperature interval, a difference between two temperatures or an uncertainty. In 1948, the 9th CGPM and the CIPM formally adopted "degree Celsius".
Fahrenheit : Fahrenheit (symbol: °F) is a unit of measurement for temperature. In most countries during the mid to late 20th century, the Fahrenheit scale was replaced by the Celsius scale. However, it remains the official scale of the United States, Cayman Islands and Belize.
So The Melting Points of Metals Like A Satellite Hoax or A Tesla Electric Vehicles?
Metals are known for their ability to withstand extreme conditions. Heavy loads, nonstop cycling, high impact, caustic environments and even high temperatures. Furnaces, combustion engines, jet engines, ignition nozzles, high-speed machinery, and exhaust systems are consistently subjected to temperatures that can cause certain metal types to melt. When selecting a metal for a high temperature application, several different temperature points need to be evaluated, and one of the most critical temperatures to know is the melting temperature of the metal.
What is the Melting Temperature of Metals?
A metal’s melting temperature, more scientifically known as the melting point, is the temperature that a metal begins to transform from a solid phase into a liquid phase. At the melting temperature, the solid phase and liquid phase of a metal exist in equilibrium. Once this temperature is achieved, heat can be continuously added to the metal, however this will not raise the overall temperature. Once the metal is completely in the liquid phase, additional heat will again continue to raise the temperature of the metal.
Why is the Metal Melting Temperature Important?
There are many important temperatures that a metal reaches as it is heated through either a metalworking process or as a result of the application, but the melting temperature of a metal is one of the most important.
One reason the melting temperature is so important is because of the component failure that can occur once a metal reaches its melting temperature. Metal failure may happen before the melting point, but when a metal reaches its melting temperature and begins to become a liquid, it will no longer serve its intended purpose. For instance, if a furnace component begins to melt, the furnace will no longer function if the component is important enough. If a jet engine fuel nozzle melts, the orifices will clog and may render the engine useless. It is important to note that other types of metal failure such as creep-induced fractures may occur well before the melting temperature is reached, and research needs to be done beforehand on the effect of the various temperatures to which a metal will be subjected.
Another reason why the melting temperature of a metal is so important is that metals are most formable when they are liquid. Metals are heated to their melting temperatures for many different manufacturing processes. Smelting, fusion welding, and casting all require metals to be liquids in order to be performed. When performing a manufacturing process where the metal is going to be melted, it is important to know the temperature at which that will happen so that the appropriate materials for the equipment being used can be selected. For instance, a welding gun must be able to withstand the ambient heat of an electrical arc and molten metal. Casting equipment such as dies must have a higher melting temperature than the metal being cast.
Melting Temperatures of Common Metals
These are the melting temperatures of common metal types:
Aluminum: 660°C (1220°F)
Brass: 930°C (1710°F)
Aluminum Bronze*: 1027-1038°C (1881-1900°F)
Chromium: 1860°C (3380°F)
Copper: 1084°C (1983°F)
Gold: 1063°C (1945°F)
Inconel*: 1390-1425°C (2540-2600°F)
Cast Iron: 1204°C (2200°F)
Lead: 328°C (622°F)
Molybdenum: 2620°C (4748°F)
Nickel: 1453°C (2647°F)
Platinum: 1770°C (3218°F)
Silver: 961°C (1762°F)
Carbon Steel*: 1425-1540°C (2597-2800°F)
Stainless Steel*: 1375 – 1530°C (2500-2785°F)
Titanium: 1670°C (3038°F)
Tungsten: 3400°C (6152°F)
Zinc: 420°C (787°F)
*Alloys have more than one element, therefore their melting temperature is a range that is dependent on the alloy composition.
Earth's Atmospheric Layers is
Troposphere
The troposphere starts at the Earth's surface and extends 8 to 14.5 kilometers high (5 to 9 miles). This part of the atmosphere is the most dense. Almost all weather is in this region.
Stratosphere
The stratosphere starts just above the troposphere and extends to 50 kilometers (31 miles) high. The ozone layer, which absorbs and scatters the solar ultraviolet radiation, is in this layer.
Mesosphere
The mesosphere starts just above the stratosphere and extends to 85 kilometers (53 miles) high. Meteors burn up in this layer
Thermosphere
The thermosphere starts just above the mesosphere and extends to 600 kilometers (372 miles) high. Aurora and satellites occur in this layer.
Ionosphere
The ionosphere is an abundant layer of electrons and ionized atoms and molecules that stretches from about 48 kilometers (30 miles) above the surface to the edge of space at about 965 km (600 mi), overlapping into the mesosphere and thermosphere. This dynamic region grows and shrinks based on solar conditions and divides further into the sub-regions: D, E and F; based on what wavelength of solar radiation is absorbed. The ionosphere is a critical link in the chain of Sun-Earth interactions. This region is what makes radio communications possible.
Exosphere
This is the upper limit of our atmosphere. It extends from the top of the thermosphere up to 10,000 km (6,200 mi).
How come these documentaries never go into detail about the Van Allen Belts? Like what kind of radiation? What about this radiation is lethal and will not allow us to go through it? They just make a statement and do not back it up. As far as the flag moving bit, I find it hard to believe that we would go into such intricate detail to make this look credible and overlook a majorly noticeable thing like that. As far as the footage from inside the craft, well they didn't prove or disprove anything, just formed an opinion and tried to pass it as proof. I'm not convinced we didn't go, I'm also not saying we did without a doubt go to the Moon, but this documentary provided a very weak argument.
A launch window is a particular period during which it will be easier to place the satellite in the orbit necessary to perform its intended function. With the space shuttle, an extremely important factor in choosing the launch window was the need to bring down the astronauts safely if something went wrong. The astronauts had to be able to reach a safe landing area with rescue personnel standing by. For other types of flights, including interplanetary exploration, the launch window must permit the flight to take the most efficient course to its very distant destination. If weather is bad or a malfunction occurs during a launch window, the flight must be postponed until the next launch window appropriate for the flight. If a satellite were launched at the wrong time of the day in perfect weather, the satellite could end up in an orbit that would not pass over any of its intended users. Timing is everything!
-
2:19:00
What If Everything You Were Taught Was A Lie?
14 days agoExploring Tartaria Mysteries Ancient Maps You Were Never Meant To See Antarctica Our Hidden Earth
2.98K5 -
LIVE
The Bubba Army
22 hours agoTrump accuses Obama of TREASON! - Bubba the Love Sponge® Show | 7/23/25
2,921 watching -
28:26
Producer Michael
20 hours agoIS THIS MY MOST CRAZY PURCHASE YET?!
10.7K1 -
23:21
marcushouse
8 hours ago $1.10 earnedStarship Flight When!? Yea, a LOT Just Happened!
9.29K1 -
23:48
Jasmin Laine
17 hours ago“We Reject Demographic Change”—Carney’s Comment BLOWS UP as Poilievre Drops the Hammer
11.4K19 -
LIVE
BEK TV
23 hours agoTrent Loos in the Morning 7/23/2025
217 watching -
12:48
Degenerate Jay
15 hours ago $1.17 earnedUbisoft Hates Game Preservation
15.6K5 -
9:33
The Art of Improvement
21 hours ago $1.99 earnedHow to Bounce Back from Hard Times
17.9K4 -
4:53
The Official Steve Harvey
1 day ago $1.34 earnedNo Such Thing as Luck — Just God’s Grace
16.9K5 -
6:16
GBGunsRumble
21 hours agoGBGuns @ Alabama Arsenal Czech Weapons CSV-9
13.5K