VivaBarnes on Lake Trial III (for the signatures): Lake atty's put together a very intelligent case
9/25/23 with Ken Paxton. Common Sense take
Barnes thinks they made a good case and the court is dirty. Heath thinks the opposite on both, see
https://rumble.com/v4h3qjh-ryan-heath-on-alphawarrior-926-and-sgt-kari-lake-attys-failed-to-cite-bindi.html
They both make good arguments. Heath says it's not a realistic lawsuit because it's not based on Arizona law. His lawsuit against Judge Thompson representing Sonny Borrelli is what caused the AZ Supreme Court to remand this in the first place. That led to Trial II and this is number III, asking the court to make MC prove the sigs are good.
Putting Trial II in context, Judge Thompson rewrote the Lake team's argument after the AZ SC kicked it back to him, to be that NOT ONE BALLOT SIGNATURE COMPARISON WAS MADE at any level, which Heath stresses is NOT the legal standard, but Kari's team went with that, maybe because an election contest is time sensitive and they had to try to win on Thompson's terms, and there was no time to let it play out in court. Heath and Donofrio seem to be making better legal arguments, to me, on Trial II than Olson/Blehm. On Trial III, Heath's reasoning (AZ leg gave MC total authority on signatures and envelopes) is not the court's as far as I can tell. The court says MC can't give up the envelopes because the signatures are private. Barnes refutes that here. Pulitzer gives details here:
https://rumble.com/v4gcjzl-jovan-121123-on-kari-lake-signature-battle.html
https://rumble.com/v4g1m46-jovan-pulitzer-judge-hannah-got-it-wrong-kari-lake-legal-team-blehm-failed-.html
Paxton 12 minute breakdown on why we need to check signatures:
https://rumble.com/v2md4k4-texas-ag-ken-paxton-signature-check-is-imperative-to-prevent-mail-in-ballot.html
VivaBarnes on SCOAZ correcting Thompson on the signature count:
https://rumble.com/v2mdgoi-robert-barnes-and-viva-frei-az-supreme-court-orders-lower-court-to-check-th.html
https://rumble.com/v2oc2nw-vivabarnes-4-5-23-on-az-supreme-courts-order-to-review-signatures.html
On Thompson's ruling on signatures @16min:
https://rumble.com/v2zucyu-vivabarnes-rachel-alexander-react-to-the-kari-lake-ruling-52423.html
#vivabarnes #karilake #maricopa, #ken paxton
-
DVR
Jewels Jones Live ®
1 day agoDNC SEWAGE SHOW | A Political Rendezvous - Ep. 89
23.2K23 -
1:09:16
I_Came_With_Fire_Podcast
20 hours ago"Why Voting Matters: Free Speech, America First, & Strong Foreign Policy" with Baker Leavitt
27K20 -
2:09:45
LFA TV
10 hours agoSubverting the West - 'Dirty Tricks' of the Chinese Communist Party 2 | WHISTLEBLOWERS with AVA CHEN 8/24/24
37.4K44 -
18:51
Tundra Tactical
17 hours agoVeteran ROASTS your favorite firearms (and your generation)!
56K44 -
16:57
Film Threat
15 hours agoTHE CROW | Film Threat Reviews
42K20 -
22:39
Misha Petrov
20 hours agoI Took The “Am I Fatphobic?” Quiz
54.5K43 -
6:50
The Gun Collective
1 day agoTop things WRONG with this gun...
50.7K13 -
12:51
Liam Reid
16 hours ago9-Year-Old 250 2 Stroke vs Modern 4 Stroke!
69.2K30 -
7:20
Adam Does Movies
20 hours agoBlink Twice Movie Review - A Thrilling Start For Zoë Kravitz
54.8K11 -
1:37:26
Game On!
17 hours ago $6.41 earnedCollege Football 2024 Has ARRIVED!
62.4K5