Statistician William Briggs on whether VERBAL dialog can resolve scientific issues
Here it is. Directly from the "Statistician to the Stars" William M. Briggs who is a respected expert on science and statistics (that not everyone agrees with but that can be said of anyone in the field).
He says it is preposterous that pro-vaccine "scientists" refuse to engage with me in a civil verbal debate. There is nothing requiring debates to done in the peer-review literature. In fact, Briggs argues that such arguments are preposterous.
See more about him here: https://www.wmbriggs.com/
We agreed on every point.
We also went through all the attempts to debunk my analysis posted by Dr. Jonathan Laxton on X. Laxton won't do a live dialog and insists on taking pot shots from the sidelines. Briggs basically frowns on this approach; if you want to resolve a disagreement, this is a very inefficient approach. We go through all of Laxton's 5 objections.
-
1:03:05
Vaccine Choice Canada
7 months agoVAX-UNVAX: LET THE SCIENCE SPEAK Brian Hooker PhD (ENG Subtitled)
9841 -
1:01:38
collapselife
3 months agoCan objective science be saved? (Hint: Yes, it can)
1503 -
1:08
Cryptostreets
2 months agoSide Does Matter: Unlocking the Secret Power of Vaccine Placement
672 -
42:24
Health Ranger Report
6 months agoSteve Kirsch and Mike Adams discuss convincing data...
11K11 -
1:07
The Real Dr. Judy A. Mikovits
3 months agoScientism is propaganda. I'll help you with real solutions and education!
1.82K1 -
1:32:19
DrLawrencePalevsky
1 month agoThe Story Behind Vaccines with Dr Lawrence Palevsky on Innovative Medicine Podcast
135 -
1:12
Cryptostreets
3 months agoNew Research Demonstrates That Common Sense Is Not So Common After All
1892 -
1:01
Life Dynamics
8 months agoAbortion Distortion #24 - "Following The Science" On Abortion
57 -
1:08:27
childrenshealthdefense
3 months agoSilencing the Science
2.93K -
46:02
My Favorite Conservative
3 months agoDebating COVID-19: Science, Policy, and Politics
37