Silencing the Science
When Nathaniel Mead, along with his co-authors, published a paper analyzing the COVID mRNA shot platform, they faced censorship by means of a retraction. What did the scientific literature expose that called for such a response from the powers that be?
Looking into the Pfizer clinical trial data uncovered shocking, ‘statistically significant’ data on adverse events in the vaccinated, it revealed a lack of ‘adequate safety and toxicological testing’ of the products and it challenged the mainstream risk-benefit narrative on the shots.
The article attests to ‘Serious harms to humans, quality control issues and process-related impurities, mechanisms underlying adverse events (AEs), the immunologic basis for vaccine inefficacy, and concerning mortality trends based on the registrational trial data.’
Hear the details, from Nathaniel Meal and ‘Defender In-Depth’ host, Michael Nevradakis, in this episode on CHD.TV!
-
1:08:27
BaggyPants
3 months agoSilencing the Science-CHD
228 -
1:00:37
Health Biz and Politics
2 months agoPoliticized Science Ruins Good Medicine
111 -
2:22
TheSteveGruberShow
3 months agoScientific Censorship At It's Finest
210 -
2:54
Just the News
2 months agoDr. Malone sounds alarm on government interference in medical journals over COVID research
4.37K -
38:57
TheWildDoc
1 year agoExperts Say Have Faith in Science, How Ironic. The Truth Behind the Whooping Cough Vaccine
9331 -
1:59:36
donmar316
1 year agoSTOP THE SHOT PART III:DOCTORS NURSES AND WHISTLEBLOWERS
59 -
2:22
RealAmericasVoice
3 months agoScientific Censorship At It's Finest
1.99K1 -
25:32
FanaticVoyage
4 months agoSTOP THE SHOTS NOW - Bombshell mRNA Study - Natali Morris Speaks to Nathaniel Mead on Redacted
122 -
1:09:01
Right2Freedom
1 year agoConspiracy to Silence Doctors
1791 -
2:51
Not MSM
2 months agoTop Pfizer Scientists Suppressed Concerns Over COVID-19 Boosters, MRNA Tech
97