SenatorBobHallTexas

Today I am interviewing a surviving spouse, Patty, whose husband went to the hospital to be treated for COVID. Patty's husband died of heart and kidney failure, not because of COVID, and it is because of hospital protocols. Hospitals used to be benevolent organizations that had patients' best interest at heart, now, because of the change in how they are owned and operated, the number one priority is profit, patient outcomes are a distant second goal. Patty's husband was an avid fisher, family man, and was the one to step up to care for his mother-in-law when she needed extra help. He was an integral aspect of a non-profit that helped teens and young adults learn life skills. Patty and her husband both got COVID in early August 2021. He started having issues breathing, had high fever and joint pain. He called his doctor and was able to get a prescription for steroids. After a week, he wasn't getting better so he called his doctor again. With his oxygen level being "too low", the doctor advised him to go to the hospital because it was "the only place to get oxygen." Patty took him to hospital at 12:30pm, they kept him in the ER until about 5:30am. During that time his oxygen levels remained in the 94-98 range. He sent a text to Patty that said, "They have done absolutely nothing…no fluid, no oxygen. He (doctor) said the oxygen levels were good. but he's trying to figure out a way to keep me for observation overnight." For two day his oxygen levels were good, but the hospital kept him to give him Remdesivir. In a text he sent to his brother, Patty's husband said, "They are giving me Remdesivir, it's supposed to really help. I may be able to go home tomorrow as long as my oxygen levels stay good." Remdesivir was originally used to treat Ebola, but was discontinued after half the patients in the trials died. When the FDA approved Remdesivir with an Emergency Use Authorization, they did not disclose the sordid past of the drug, or the fact that it destroys the kidneys. The hospital protocol requires the COVID patients to be given IV fluids, this, in addition to Remdesivir, causes a body to retain excess fluid. This leads to organ failure. Even though hospitals know this, they continue to use this protocol because the hospital administration knows they will receive increased payments for each dose of Remdesivir that is administered. The hospital would not allow Patty in to visit her husband for five days, and even though she called the hospital multiple times a day, no one returned her call or would talk to her to give her an update. On day five, he sent Patty a picture of himself and told her they were transferring him to a different room because he "needed more oxygen." Patty went to the hospital to talk to someone, a nurse asked when the last time she had seen him. Patty was confused, the hospital front desk told her every day that she wasn't allowed to go see her husband. The nurse said that was incorrect, they had a lottery for visitors, Patty would need to sign up to get a spot. After two more days, Patty's husband could no longer talk to her, he couldn't sit up. Patty learned about the success of patients on Ivermectin and asked the hospital to give it to her husband, but the hospital ridiculed her and refused her request. For five days Patty requested they give her husband Ivermectin, for five days the hospital refused. Patty contacted his primary care doctor but was told that once the patient was in the hospital, the primary could no longer care for the patient. On his tenth day in the hospital, they told Patty that he needed to be put on a ventilator because he was deteriorating. "We've done the protocol, there's nothing more we can do," they kept telling her. Patty urged her husband to tell them "no" to the vent. He was on 70% high-flow oxygen, they told him he either needed to get vented or "get up and walk." This "tough love" caused him to get so upset that his energy tanked and he ended up on 100% high-flow oxygen. Patty had had enough. She told the attending doctor that she would sign whatever paperwork they requested but that she wanted her husband to be given Ivermectin. Within three days of being given Ivermectin, he was like a different person! He messaged Patty asking her to bring him shaving cream and a razor, telling her that he wanted to eat Chipotle, and telling their daughter that he was "healed." And, he was off oxygen! The doctors told her that he could go home in two days. During that evening, he had a low oxygen event and he had shortness of breath. He desperately tried to get a nurse but she was on a lunch break, so he started screaming for help. When help arrived, they wanted to put him directly on a ventilator. After this event, no more Ivermectin was given to Patty's husband. The hospital personnel were obnoxious and dismissive of Patty's request. The hospital was so negative in how they talked to them, telling them how many each day left in body bags. The lung doctor told him there was nothing more he could do and he was being transferred to an ICU doctor. Patty got him transferred to a different room so he didn't have to see the body bags leaving the hospital. Her husband continued to be on high-flow oxygen and every day the hospital would pressure her to let them put him on a ventilator. He would send Patty texts begging for ice chips, telling her that no one was coming into his room. When Patty asked the ICU doctor, "Could you just give him ice," she was told, "We have a lot of emergencies here." His oxygen levels dropped into the 60's and he was vented. Two days later, Patty's husband passed away. He didn't die because of COVID, he died because the hospital protocol dictated a treatment plan that included the administration of a drug that is known to cause organ failure, the use of ventilators, a lack of adequate, attentive treatment, and the denial of an inexpensive, effective treatment drug that made a significant difference, when it was allowed. But, because of the hospital protocol, any suggestion to try a different treatment was nearly futile, and the denial to continue the Ivermectin, when it was apparent that is was working, does nothing more than prove that the hospital was more concerned with racking up the Remdesivir bonus payments than it was with caring for people. Hospitals are no longer the benevolent organizations that care for people, they are now the places people go to die. COVID has shown the true intent of hospital administrators and it has caused a great distrust among people. I fear that there will be no going back. Hospitals are not where you want to go when you get COVID, I would recommend you take measures now to be prepared. The Frontline Doctors COVID Protocol can be found at https://covid19criticalcare.com/. There are many options to get treatment at home and many resources available to minimize your need to go to a hospital. To learn more, visit ProtocolKills.com where you can find more information, read real-life stories, and share your own story. Need more information on complaints? https://mailchi.mp/c10bbcd4c6cc/demise-of-world-premier-healthcare-system?e=b56aaa5d4c&fbclid=IwAR0dTDh-KdD5bZkCA1jkBxSA4DkoXZaGuef3yJp0J6DvwVFc7f5Hf29yGw8

It all ended two days before Christmas, December 23, 2021. It started December 3, when Kristine was taking a walk with her dad, who she affectionately calls, Daddy-o. "I love my dad, I see him5-6 times a week." On this day, dad was joking and laughing, enjoying the fresh air, and he mentioned that he felt he was getting a cold, Kristine says. On Sunday, December 5, Kristine started feeling as if she was getting cold as well, so she kept distance from her dad. By December 7,multiple family members were sick with what they thought was the flu. Kristine's husband and daughter had to get a COVID test in order to return to work, and it was at that time they both tested positive for COVID. Kristine took her dad to get tested and it came back positive as well. It was advised that he be taken to ER or they "would call a squad. "He was dropped off at the nearest ER, and was admitted the next morning and given 3liters of oxygen. The hospital refused to let Kristine in the hospital due to her proximity to family members that had tested positive. According to what hospital staff told Kristine when she called, her dad was doing ok, joking with his 95 year old roommate, enjoying watching football on TV, and laughing with the nurses. Kristine informed the staff that she was her dad's power of attorney (POA) and wanted all updates regarding his treatment immediately. Three days later. Kristine is informed that her dad's oxygen levels have started to decline. It was later discovered that the hospital had started him on Remdesivir around the time that he was admitted. The hospital never told Kristine they had taken this action, although she was his POA and the hospital is legally required to discuss treatment plans with her. What we are seeing is that hospitals will intimidate patients, especially elderly patients, by telling them, "take this medication or you will die." What most people don't know is that hospitals get a 20% bonus for each dose of Remdesivir that is administered, and are completely ignoring reports of increased death risks that are present with its use. Remdesivir was originally introduced as a drug to treat Ebola, but during the drug trials, half of the patients that were given the drug died, so they stopped the trials. However, the FDA approved Remdesivir with emergency use authorization to treat COVID. The Frontline doctors raised red flags, saying that it increases risk of death, and yet the media and FDA ignored the evidence. After being on Remdesivir for 3-4 days, Kristine's dad was transferred to ICU and given 60 liters of oxygen… the hospital never called Kristine. By this time Kristine had gotten a negative COVID test, however, the hospital refused to let her in to see her dad, so she called the hospital one time per shift to get updates. Often, instead of being given an update, they would ask her, "What do you want to know?" This was emotionally taxing for Kristine as she didn't know all the specific questions to ask about what was happening with her dad. At 10pm, on December 17, the hospital called Kristine and said, "Your dad is struggling to breath, we want to put him in an induced coma, and put him on a ventilator for a couple days so he can rest." After talking with her dad, Kristine decided if they felt it was the best treatment for him, she would agree, but that she wanted to be informed when they put him on the ventilator and how he tolerated it. At midnight, they put him on the ventilator, at 1:00am they called Kristine and told her that he had tolerated it well. At 3:30am,the hospital called back saying, "your dad is tanking, get his wife, and come to hospital." Kristine's dad languished in the hospital for days, the hospital staff refused her pleas to use Ivermectin and monoclonal antibodies because it was against hospital protocol. On December 23, Kristine's dad was still being given Remdesivir and two medications to suppress his respirations. That is at least 10 days of a drug that is normally only given for five days. Doctors are saying at this point there is barely any chance of survival, and if he does survive, he would be confined to a nursing home for the rest of his days. Kristine made the difficult decision to turn the machines off. Her dad didn't make it 7 minutes. In the moments that the machines are being turned off, Kristine, fully outfitted in the hospital's required PPE gear, sobbing as her father fades away, throws her goggles to the ground so she can see her dad in his final moments. This action is met by the ICU manager barking, "Put your goggles on!" showing a complete lack of empathy towards patients. During the following days, as Kristine was researching what happened to her dad, she asked why he was taken to ER. She was told it was because his oxygen was at 88. "That shouldn't mean death, there was a lot that I could have done to help my dad," Kristine said, "they murdered my father. "People are dying in hospitals, not because of COVID, but because of hospital protocols and their refusal to use hydroxychloroquine or ivermectin, but are using Remdesivir, which is KNOWN to cause death. Hospitals' refusal to use these medications is in an effort to increase the acceptance of vaccines and subsequent boosters….indefinitely. It is believed that vaccines will ultimately be found to be the cause of the COVID variants. We must keep fighting for the truth! To learn more, visit ProtocolKills.com where you can find more information, read real-life stories, and share your own story. Need more information on complaints? https://mailchi.mp/c10bbcd4c6cc/demise-of-world-premier-healthcare-system?e=b56aaa5d4c&fbclid=IwAR0dTDh-KdD5bZkCA1jkBxSA4DkoXZaGuef3yJp0J6DvwVFc7f5Hf29yGw8

They constantly told her dad that he was going to die. - Firsthand Family Hospital Protocol Experience "My dad's name is James Andrew Smith," said Deana, "he is my best friend, biggest supporter. He's been married to my mother for 57 years, has two daughters and five grandchildren" Deana's father was 81, so when the pandemic started, they were very careful to avoid COVID, they did not go to stores and avoided high-risk areas. But COVID found them eventually. Deana told the doctor under no circumstances did she want her dad to be given Remdesivir. The doctor replied, "He is my patient, not you. I will do what my patient wants," ignoring the fact that Deana and her sister are his power of attorneys. At this point, her dad agreed to not having Remdesivir. The doctor convinced Deana's dad that she was standing in the way of him getting treatment and would die if he didn't get Remdesivir. They were not giving him any food and kept him in isolation. At one point, he sent his wife a text message that said, "Honey, I'm going through hell in here right now being spun around, medicine etc, loved to have been let out of here, or have you around me." Mr. Smith eventually chose to get Remdesivir. Deana was upset about this and called the nurse, "He has the best lungs on the floor" the nurse said. Deana pressed the nurses to tell her what their plan for discharge was, they couldn't tell her. Later a nurse reached out to Deana and told her that when he came in to check on her dad, that he hadn't been bathed and he had stuff caked in his mouth, which took an hour to get it out, but that he didn't know what it was. Her dad asked the nurse, "Am I dying?" The nurse replied, "It doesn't look good." The nurse set up a FaceTime call for the next day. Deana said she was excited to finally see her dad. The family felt that the hospital was only concerned with following their "protocol" and getting all their bonus payments. They would rather have him spend his last few days suffering on a ventilator to get a bonus payment than making him comfortable. They constantly told her dad that he was going to die. After the two days were up, Deana went to the hospital. What she found was disheartening, her Dad was defeated, lying on his bed with a high-flow oxygen mask. One has to wonder, how do you go from 3 liters of oxygen at home with a stable oxygen level at 92, to 80-100% high-flow oxygen within a couple of days? Deana found the room was trashy, blood in the sink, and her dad had fungus/sores in his mouth. The hospital was not giving him any nutrition, no fluids. Deana wanted to know what the plan was for getting him discharged, still the hospital couldn't tell her. She began telling her dad, "You're not dying. We will get you out of here." One afternoon she went to ask a nurse why no one was coming to check on him when he had rang his bell an hour prior. The charge nurse questioned her, "What are you doing here? You need to get back in that room. Are you vaccinated?" When Deana responded that she had natural immunity because she had recently recovered from COVID, the charge nurse yelled at her, "I bet your dad isn't even vaccinated! You people are the reason for this mess." Deana walked back to the room. I would encourage everyone to be educated, do your own research. Read what Frontline doctors have said, not hospitals who follow a protocol that pays them to administer Remdesivir and won't allow Budesonide, Ivermectin and Hydroxychloroquine. Hospitals used to be benevolent hospitals, where doctors cared for their patients. Nowadays, corporations are focused on making a profit off of patients, they don't really care about patients in their hospitals. If you have experienced maltreatment by any medical professional, file a complaint with the Texas Medical Board. They are required to conduct an investigation. If enough people file complaints, we will bring more light to this situation. Does any of this sound familiar to you? What can you do? Tell your story at www.ProtocolKills.com, as well as, filing a complaint. Need more information on filing a complaint? https://mailchi.mp/c10bbcd4c6cc/demise-of-world-premier-healthcare-system?e=b56aaa5d4c&fbclid=IwAR2rznJ0VQcrjFKxM2-Iz-gyRZmxx3Le93eRLE5PhOHcAXkc8lH2VEOKsnw

Hospital Patient or Hostage? You Decide. Imagine, if you will, you or a loved one entering a hospital for a major medical problem, only to find they will not allow you to leave or transfer to another facility. This is the situation the Smith/Thomas Family has found themselves in the Baylor Scott and White Hospital - Grapevine. Mike Smith went to the emergency room with COVID-19. He is unvaccinated because he has cancer. He also has kidney failure. Despite telling the ER doctors of his pre-existing conditions, he was pressured to take Remdesivir, a drug known to cause kidney failure. After repeatedly refusing a ventilator, he was coerced into accepting one. Mike’s family was denied access to him except under very limited circumstances, they were bullied into an attempt to have them sign a do not resuscitate (DNR) order, and they were ridiculed and belittled for their requests for Ivermectin and vitamin supplements to enhance his immune system. Fed up with the treatment Mike was getting, the family began to search for alternative placements for him. They identified a hospital willing to take him, but their efforts were thwarted by the hospital’s failure to contact the hospital and to take the necessary actions to facilitate the move. When the family contacted Representative Tan Parker and my office, the staff made it known to the family that they were not happy with the decision to draw us into the discussion. If possible, the staff’s treatment of the family got even worse. Watch this video to hear Ashley Smith Thomas, Mike’s daughter, tell their family story. Decide for yourself if this is a “miscommunication” on the part of staff or a deliberate attempt to malign and intimidate a family for their medical choices. As of last night, Mike’s request for a transfer to a hospital that would treat him more civilly was continuing to be stonewalled. We will continue to work for his transfer. I ask for your prayers for Mike and his family, that he will be moved to a facility where he will get the help and healing he needs to be reunited with his family. Does any of this sound familiar to you? What can you do? Tell your story atwww.ProtocolKills.com, as well as, filing a complaint. Need more information on filing a complaint?https://mailchi.mp/c10bbcd4c6cc/demise-of-world-premier-healthcare-system?e=b56aaa5d4c&fbclid=IwAR3wDVq8rwvLl4P86cOeH2t2w2lsV07xOXwf5hzzI2aI-EeC-IoIMMmTebg

COVID-19 has claimed over 80,000 Texan lives since the beginning of the pandemic. Our doctors and hospitals have changed from a place of healing to, for some, a place where recovery is the last priority. People are dying in hospitals because of policies that promote use of Remdesivir after the optimal time for treatment has passed. Instead of acting as it is meant to, Remdesivir has led to patients experiencing organ failure and death. Julie Johnson's mother was one of the many victims of hospital policies. Julie's mom was being treated for COVID-19 by a local doctor, and reportedly improving well. Julie and her mom were sick at the same time, and Julie told me she was struggling to help her mom move around the house. On Monday, August 2nd, Julie called an ambulance to take her mom to the hospital. Julie told the driver she didn't want her mom taken to Baytown, but the ambulance was contracted with Baytown Methodist Hospital. She was assured that she would be able to transfer her mom to another hospital easily. Once admitted for monitoring due to low oxygen content, her mom was given a five-day course of Remdesivir. Ativan was added to the cocktail to prevent her from resisting and being combative with the nurses. Julie requested Hydroxychloroquine and Ivermectin, but the hospital staff laughed at her. The request for high dose vitamins was not fulfilled; instead, her mom was given what seemed like a child's dose. After a bag of convalescent plasma was provided, her mom seemed to be improving. The doctor did not respond to requests for another bag until 7 days had passed. By then, it was too late for the plasma to help her. Julie's mom, despite being diabetic, having one kidney, and already experiencing liver issues, was given Remdesivir without her consent or knowledge. Julie's consent was needed for convalescent plasma and ventilation, but not for a drug that has high rates of organ failure and death when it is not used at the correct time. Hospital staff repeatedly pushed Julie to consent to a Do Not Resuscitate (DNR). One doctor told them that he would sign a DNR if she didn't consent. During a procedure performed in her hospital room, her mother's nurse called Julie's cousin and asked what Julie and her sister's wishes were and asked what would happen if that day was the day she died. Julie's mother died that day. Julie's mother died alone, tied to her bed, and after being treated by a doctor that was not supposed to be treating her at all. Julie's mom had specifically written in her records that the doctor was not allowed to see her. Her medical records do not indicate that her mom provided consent for any of the procedures or medications. Julie was not allowed to talk to her mother on the phone. If you or a loved one have or are currently enduring a similar situation, make sure you report the situation to the Texas Medical Board as soon as possible. As I have said before, my staff is able to help you locate the forms. Does any of this sound familiar to you? What can you do? Tell your story at www.ProtocolKills.com, as well as, filing a complaint. Need more information on filing a complaint? https://mailchi.mp/c10bbcd4c6cc/demise-of-world-premier-healthcare-system?e=b56aaa5d4c&fbclid=IwAR270MewngEjNmV5D0ktgoaOzbJxP-hiAqel0P2f7dL-73yoIiBNwqNfMq4

Dayna Stevens thought her mother was having a COPD flare-up, so she took her to the hospital on September 27, 2021. There, hospital staff tested her mother for COVID-19, and the test turned up positive. A nursing student, Dayna advised her mother to refuse the medicine Remdesivir as treatment and refuse to be placed on a ventilator, should it come to that. From September 27 to October 6, the hospital let her mother lay there without treatment, Dayna asserts. Her mother’s oxygen levels worsened, and she complained of trouble breathing to hospital staff, who did not heed her objections. On October 9, the hospital placed Danya’s mother on a breathing machine. The next day, her mother complained of chest pains, in distress. The hospital administered an arterial blood gas test, which showed she only had 51 percent oxygen in her bloodstream. When she called the nurses station from her room, the nurses made fun of her and hung up on her. On October 11, the hospital started her on a BiPAP machine. She was claustrophobic and did not do well on the machine. An x-ray of her chest confirmed a severe case of pneumonia. Her mother’s pulmonologist informed Dayna that they would move her mother to the ICU. Dayna says that conversations with doctors turned to palliative and hospice care, as opposed to how they could make her mother better. The hospital made Dayna sign a DNR since her mother did not want to be ventilated. Her mother told Dayna that her physicians and nurses would tell her three to four times a day that she was dying. Dayna wanted to move her mother, either bring her home for her final days or move her to a hospice center not far from her house. Because her mother was still testing positive for COVID-19 and was in a critical state, the hospital would not let Dayna move her. Dayna consulted with attorneys, who informed her she would have to obtain an injunction against the hospital to move her mother. Thus, she had little choice but to agree to general inpatient hospice at the hospital, and so her mother was re-admitted, this time under hospice care. Dayna says the hospital gave her a date and time they would end her mother’s life. Because her mother refused its prescribed course of treatment, the hospital essentially refused to treat her and left her to die, Danya claims. On October 22, oxygen was removed from the patient, and her mother took her final breath at 3:58 p.m.

Historically, we have believed that when a loved one falls ill, the prudent thing to do is to take them to a hospital where they will be helped. That was what Angela B. and her family thought when her mother fell ill with COVID in July. Two days later, on August 1st, a high fever prompted the family to take her mom to the emergency room to treat the fever. They were unprepared and uninformed about what would happen next. First, the entire family was forced to leave the hospital. They had little communication with staff. Because her mom still had her cell phone, Angela was able to get daily pictures. She watched in horror at the daily deterioration of her condition. The doctor told the family that their loved one would die in two weeks. She did. But not from COVID. She was given Remdesivir. She had blood coming from her eyes, ears, and nose from the blood thinners. Wooden boards were put on her arms to prevent her from removing the tubes or ventilator. Though she had no pre-existing conditions of kidney or organ damage, at the end she was black, forty pounds heavier than she had ever been, and drowned in her own fluids. Listening to Angela’s story, it is easy to understand why some medical personnel are frustrated, burned out, and leaving the system. For those wanting to care and comfort the sick and dying, it must be difficult to watch or participate in what is currently going on in the name of science. Angela’s greatest regret is that she listened to what the medical personnel said and did not go in and hug her mom or hold her hand at the end. Warning: the photos in this video may be graphic and disturbing to some viewers. Does any of this sound familiar to you? What can you do? Tell your story at www.ProtocolKills.com, as well as, filing a complaint. Need more information on filing a complaint? https://mailchi.mp/c10bbcd4c6cc/demise-of-world-premier-healthcare-system?e=b56aaa5d4c&fbclid=IwAR1vvcIMR36Tbvd6uPuMX8bnDMabruqvKzNtEKz8CM0sshw_3AQv28fBvW0

Early treatment can be the difference between life and death. After nearly two years in a worldwide pandemic, over 80,000 people are dead. One of the possible reasons for the high death count is the lack of early treatment. In the beginning of the pandemic, doctors instructed patients to stay home until they had noticeable difficulty breathing. By the time the patient arrived in the hospital, they would already be in respiratory distress, and it was too late for any of the effective early treatments to save them. People are dying, but COVID-19 is not the only cause of death. When Therese Hernandez' father, Joe, tested positive for COVID-19 on August 30th, he contacted his doctor at the VA hospital. He was instructed to monitor his oxygen. When the oxygen content dropped to 90%, his doctor instructed him to go to the hospital for a monoclonal antibody infusion. When the nurses found out that Joe was not vaccinated, he was denied the monoclonal antibody treatment and was told he would be admitted into the hospital. Doctors administered Remdesivir in the emergency room on September 3rd. Therese was unaware of the high risks of administering Remdesivir. Joe's condition declined with every treatment of Remdesivir that he received. Soon, he was struggling to breathe. On September 11th, Joe was transferred to the ICU. Doctors and nurses harassed him daily about his vaccination status and were constantly asking him to accept a ventilator. Joe refused repeatedly even though he was struggling to speak. He was neglected by nurses and was not even assisted to the bathroom. On September 22nd, Joe begged Therese to get medicine to help him breathe. The doctors told Therese when Joe refused to be vented that Joe wouldn't survive without a ventilator. The hospital staff treated Joe like a second class citizen because he was not vaccinated. He was neglected by nurses and the dangerous side effects of Remdesivir were ignored. His organs failed and he went into cardiac arrest within days. When Therese called the hospital on September 29th, no one answered her calls. When she finally reached a nurse, Therese was told that Joe was dying and that she needed to come to the hospital. Therese was not able to arrive at the hospital before Joe went into cardiac arrest and died. The bottom line continues – COVID patients are dying because of hospital policies; not just COVID. Does any of this sound familiar to you? What can you do? Tell your story at www.ProtocolKills.com, as well as, filing a complaint. Need more information on filing a complaint? https://mailchi.mp/c10bbcd4c6cc/demise-of-world-premier-healthcare-system?e=b56aaa5d4c&fbclid=IwAR3abT7G3iV3dxL3iXp5_g1VD6lijbtl25g1a9a_3Fy1W7ASCEmPqfSlfMo

Tune in and hear firsthand from Retired Brigadier General Ken Chrosniak, who has given presidential briefings on the subject, discusses the fact that the Electronic Magnetic Pulse (EMPs) are a KNOWN risk, and have been addressed in many federal reports since 2004. But even though the risk is known, government agencies, state legislatures, and public utilities either refuse to take action to harden the grid, or have undone what little measures had been put in place. Electricity is the second most important thing to sustaining life; only air is more important. People will live longer without food than without electricity because without electricity, most people will subsequently be without water. Electricity runs every aspect of our society; our personal homes, city sewer/water systems, traffic lights, state and federal defense systems, and public transportation systems. The entire food chain relies on the reliability of electricity: sorting, cleaning, packaging, preserving. Without electricity the fabric of our society will unravel. If you were asked, "What is the greatest existential threat to the American way of life?" Would you think of a foreign country invasion, the drug crisis that is the number one killer of youth today, or maybe the polarizing political factions in our country? What if you were told the greatest threat was the threat to our electricity grid from imminent deployment of an Electromagnetic Pulse (EMP)? It's not a question of if, but a question of when! Those who experienced the effects of Winter Storm Uri in Texas in 2021 will have some idea of how important electricity is for survival in the modern age, and while much discussion has taken place in Texas about ensuring the electricity stays on in Texas, one thing has been left out of this discussion: Hardening critical parts of the grid so we aren't vulnerable to EMP attacks. EMPs may either be naturally occurring events, such as a solar flare, or man-made weapons used as cyber attacks by remote detonation of an electromagnetic pulse above the earth's atmosphere. Either method would completely shut down an electric grid and create compounding problems. Humanity has a history of ignoring the warnings of prior generations in advancement of progress. Take Fukushima, for example. Even though they had been warned by past generations to not build past a certain point due to the threat of tsunamis, they built well beyond that boundary. They built a large city and a nuclear facility. When the imminent threat came, the tsunami wreaked havoc and decimated the city. EMPs pose such a threat for our generation. In 2019, a Presidential Executive Order directed multiple federal agencies to take measures to protect the grid from EMPs. This directive has been ignored by the current Administration and the situation is even more concerning because of the increased use of foreign-made transformers that are commonly used and which are known to contain malware, creating additional vulnerabilities in the grid.

It has been two years, and the irrational and misleading government COVID-19 craziness is still alive and thriving. Government-generated propaganda is everywhere. Most recently, the mainstream media created another group of people for us to worry about: The kids! According to Dr. Angelina Ferrella, children have a 99.997 percent chance of survival if they contract COVID-19. To put that number into perspective, children are more likely to die from a lightning strike than die from COVID-19. Children have different and, in general, more robust immune systems than adults, which helps to protect them from the COVID-19 virus. Dr. Ferrella suspects that surges in COVID-19 cases can be tied to vaccination rates from several weeks earlier. The message is that the vaccine simply is not as effective at preventing transmission several weeks after a second dose, according to a study published in the Lancet. So why, then, are we rushing to vaccinate our children? Myocarditis, one of the potential side effects of COVID-19 vaccinations, is a life-changing adverse effect. As of January 24, over 759,000 Texans aged 5-11 years old have received a COVID-19 vaccine as part of the Emergency Use Authorization or as part of a study. When some later present with shortness of breath, chest pain, and possible arrhythmia, they cannot play sports or participate in physical activity for at least three months. They must take medication, and they may have to visit a cardiologist, possibly for the rest of their life. Dr. Ferrella believes there is no real benefit to giving a child a risky vaccine when most of the children are not at high risk for negative outcomes. Regarding treatment methods, early treatment within the first few days is much more effective in halting symptoms and preventing the spread of the virus when compared to treatments that begin after eight days. When COVID-19 is treated similarly to the flu, Texans may see drastic differences in how quickly people recover from the virus. Early treatment with Ivermectin, Hydrochloroquine, or Budesonide through a nebulizer has repeatedly resulted in high recovery rates. Frontline Doctors are often able to treat COVID-19 quickly and efficiently without admitting a patient to a hospital.

Since the beginning of the pandemic, the science on masking has been at best confusing, and at worst it is government propaganda spread by individuals who have no real expertise in protection from pathogens. Texans, and all citizens of the United States, deserve the truth. We are not lab experiments to be played with by a bureaucrat, like Dr. Anthony Fauci. Kristen Meghan Kelly and Tammy Clark are subject matter experts in masks and protection protocols against pathogens. Kristen had been working for the government and private sector as an Industrial Hygienist. Her specialization is based in occupational and environmental toxicology and control of health hazards inside an occupational setting. Kristen has led the Respiratory Protection Program within the United States Air Force and in private sectored industrial and medical settings. Tammy works in occupational and environmental health and safety and, like Kristen, has sat on infectious disease committees in hospitals and trained staff on proper risk reduction methods. Her clients are hospital systems, state and local government, and the federal government in some cases. They have been working in pathogen protection for well over a decade and train medical teams to use personal protective equipment in the workplace. In contrast, Dr. Fauci is not credentialed in pathogen protection, personal protective equipment, or pandemic preparedness. He is a doctor who worked briefly in Internal Medicine before entering lab sciences and working to combat formerly fatal rheumatic and immunosuppressive illnesses. Typical medical or laboratory doctors do not have extensive training in pathogen protection. So, why are our policies being set by those with the lesser amount of training in the protection against pathogens? Tammy and Kristen depend on tests that ascertain the route of entry a pathogen takes from the ambient air into the body, for the data they use to recommend policies. Kristen’s 's field involves the study of airborne hazards and analyzing data and vectors a pathogen might use. According to her, the primary spread of the COVID virus came through aerosols, which do not require moisture to travel. Face coverings pushed by the mainstream media, by local and state governments, and by your local grocery store are not a proper form of respiratory protection against airborne pathogens, nor a form of source control for an aerosolized virus. Cloth masks, bandanas, and any other form of facial covering that is not a respirator rated against aerosols, will not stop the COVID-19 pathogen. According to Kristen, when a mask is worn for a long period of time, the pathogens that attach to moisture in the air settle on the mask. The movement of the mask causes the pathogen to be aerosolized back into the air to reinfect you or infect the people around you. In some scenarios, masks have the potential to do more harm than good. There are media doctors, again with no expertise in the field, who are pushing N-95 respirators as a solution. Tammy pointed out the difference between a mask and an N-95 respirator. Kristen informed me that the N-95 masks require a clean-shaven face to work properly and have the effect of reducing the wearer’s ability to breathe. According to OSHA rules, requiring the use of N-95 respirators is not allowed without the usage of the entire Respiratory Protection Program. Employees are required to follow a series of complicated protocols, training, complete questionnaires, and obtain a fit test a medical clearance from a qualified physician who is following the entire Respiratory Protection Protocol from OSHA. The use of an N-95 respirator is a lot more complicated than simply wearing a mask. According to Tammy, the severe restrictions put in place in other states such as Michigan were proposed by people who had no training in forming plans for protecting people against a worldwide pandemic. Regulatory standards have been thrown out the window. Children are being masked despite the risk of inhibiting oxygen intake and forcing a person to breathe their own gaseous exhalations. Tammy suspects that the pandemic will eventually lead to an increase in cancer, behavioral problems, and other medical complications from wearing a mask. The governments all over the United States ignored individuals like Tammy and Kristen in favor of government doctors like Anthony Fauci. In addition to mandates by state and local governments and some private businesses, OSHA issued an emergency order requiring vaccination or testing and masking for all employers with more than 100 employees. This order has since been blocked by the United States Supreme Court. Justices Gorsuch, Thomas, and Alito issued opinions stating that OSHA exceeded their authority and bypassed proper procedures for implementing new rules. Any individuals who are told they must wear an N-95 mask should immediately contact OSHA and report their employer to the online complaint form, in direct violation of failure to implement the requirements under 29CFR 1910.134, OSHA’s Respiratory Protection Program. Visit www.standupmichigan.com for more information and visit https://www.osha.gov/workers/file-complaint to file a complaint.

Hear firsthand from Gail Seiler, our guest in this interview, on how fortunate she is to have survived the bad behavior of the hospital and hospital policies, only because she fought to be released and go home before it was too late. Learn from her experience. COVID hospitalizations and deaths are far higher than they should be but it is not because people are dying of COVID. It is bad hospital policy that is killing COVID patients who are unfortunate enough to be hospitalized. Two facts you need to know but, your government or the mainstream media will not tell you: 1. COVID patients are being hospitalized because they are not receiving preventative or early treatment. (www.DefenseBoxes.com and www.DoctorsDontFearCOVID.com) 2. Hospitalized COVID patients who die, do so because of hospital protocol policy; not because they have COVID. Does any of this sound familiar to you? What can you do? Tell your story at www.ProtocolKills.com, as well as, filing a complaint. Need more information on filing a complaint? https://mailchi.mp/c10bbcd4c6cc/demise-of-world-premier-healthcare-system?e=b56aaa5d4c&fbclid=IwAR3abT7G3iV3dxL3iXp5_g1VD6lijbtl25g1a9a_3Fy1W7ASCEmPqfSlfMo

Tune in as I visit with Greta Crawford on her firsthand COVID hospital experience. The good news is that the Omnicron variant of COVID is far less deadly, but the bad news is that people are still dying in hospitals because of hospital policies. Remdesivir is killing patients, but doctors continue to prescribe it to COVID-19 patients in hospitals. Patients have been told they will die without Remdesivir, only to die from the side effects of the medication itself. Greta Crawford was admitted to the hospital after having COVID-19 for three weeks and developing small spots of pneumonia. Her doctor administered Remdesivir without her permission and without the informed consent. She later attributed swelling in her feet and hands, and excruciating chest pain to COVID-19 because of the medication she was being given. Greta did not consent to the administration of Remdesivir and only learned about the high risk of death from Remdesivir medication after it was administered. Despite not disclosing to her the high risk of Remdesivir, the doctors informed her she would be receiving it. After each round of Remdesivir, her white blood cell count spiked to purge the poison she was given by her doctor. Greta's heart rate fell to 30 bpm after receiving Remdesivir each night. Greta's kidneys and liver were failing and she was completely unaware that her body was filling with fluid. Finally, in fear for her life, Greta informed her nurses and doctors that she was leaving. She and her husband went home and started a long in-home recovery process following frontline doctor protocols; the protocols the hospitals refuse to follow because there is no extra federal money for using them. Greta has since started a website to inform the public on the danger of Remdesivir. She has links to informative videos on Remdesivir and Dr. Fauci's role in the use of a drug that killed 50% of the trial patients. The website has links to find doctors who prescribe safe medications, a place for Remdesivir victims to share their stories, and resources for patients. Visit www.ProtocolKills.com for more information. In addition to her battle with Remdesivir, Greta was harassed daily by nurses who told her she needed to get vaccinated. She was repeatedly told that if she did not get vaccinated, she would get COVID again, be hospitalized, and be put on a ventilator. The nurse refused to allow Greta's request for Ivermectin or Hydroxychloroquine, and she was unaware of any vaccine injuries. Aggressive nurses and doctors are pushing harmful drugs onto Texans without informed consent with no accountability from the Texas Medical Board (TMB). At the same time, the TMB is threatening the licenses of physicians who prescribe FDA approved drugs known to be safe if they do not provide a full informed consent. In hospitals today, patients are treated like lab experiments with no informed consent afforded to the patients. In spite of the legislation I co-authored, to ensure patients' rights to have a visitor, some hospitals are still refusing to allow visitors to keep their draconian policies a secret. A patient has the right to religious counseling from friends and family members who provide spiritual support. No hospital is allowed to completely ban patients from receiving a religious counseling visitor. The bottom line continues – COVID patients are dying because of hospital policies; not just COVID Does any of this sound familiar to you? What can you do? Tell your story at www.ProtocolKills.com, as well as, filing a complaint. Need more information on complaints? https://mailchi.mp/c10bbcd4c6cc/demise-of-world-premier-healthcare-system?e=b56aaa5d4c&fbclid=IwAR09YARpTvbJpFb-axRA3UIO1BsoWgqPp5JIXHjHa_U8RTdmjW0CCyUL0GM

Tune in as I visit withJenna Ouano. The outcome is not one I would wish upon anyone. Learn from her story to better prepare. Early Treatment is still key. At this time, with supply chains where they are, it would be prudent to access available items and have them in the medicine cabinet. My objective is to share these stories so together we can learn from both the success stories, as well as the unfortunate stories. I appreciate the courage of these families who are stepping-up to share their stories so that others are better equipped to protect their loved one that has the misfortune of being hospitalized. I know I have said it before, but the bottom line take away from this - Be Like a Boy Scout - Be/Get Prepared NOW. Follow the frontline doctors recommendations NOW, BEFORE YOU NEED THEM: 1. Find a doctor who will follow the proven protocols of AAPS and Dr Peter McCullough. If your current doctor will not follow these protocols, find one that does; 2. Acquire the therapeutics recommended by the frontline doctors NOW; 3. As soon as you test positive, no matter how sick you feel, immediately contact the doctor you found in step one;and 4. Begin taking the recommended therapeutics immediately. In case you didn't know, Texas law now requires hospitals to give a patient unrestricted access to a religiouscounselorvisit in the hospital. If you have had a similar experience and would like to tell your story, visit www.ProtocolKills.com/blog.

Tune in as I visit with Laura Bartlett and Jodi Hadsell of Defense Boxes (https://defenseboxes.com/) as they share their firsthand experience in the fight against COVID. Defense Boxes - A "FIRST-AID KIT" FOR COVID. Dr. Richard Bartlett’s sister, Laura Bartlett, and Jodi Hadsell have come together with the mission to ensure that every household would have a proactive plan so that no one has to die alone in the hospital on a ventilator. They fulfill their mission by connecting people to providers, providing access to ongoing support and patient advocacy. The Defense Boxes is a medical fire extinguisher for your body. It is a first-aid kit that has all the frontline doctor recommended over-the-counter early intervention treatments to give your body a head start, even before working with a medical provider. More patients die of COVID-19 in hospitals than at home, mostly because of hospital's refusal to treat early and failure to use over-the-counter treatments even though they have been proven effective in thousands of patients and multiple studies. When someone learns that they have cancer or another life threatening illness, do doctors tell them, "You can still walk and breathe, so go home until you can't stand or breathe, then come back for treatment?" Of course not! Why, then, is this the acceptable treatment for patients seeking care for COVID-19 when they go to a hospital? EARLY INTERVENTION IS CRUCIAL! Numerous studies indicate that implementing a bold, decisive early treatment plan, as soon as possible, is the best way to mitigate complications from the virus and decrease the likelihood of needing hospitalization. The frontline doctor recommended treatments using over-the-counter items are easily available at local drugstores and on-line with Defense Boxes. BUDESONIDE - AN EFFECTIVE TREATMENT. Dr. Richard Bartlett, MD, has identified inhaled Budesonide as an effective early intervention based on the responses from his patients. A recent study from the University of Oxford showed that "inhaled Budesonide reduced the relative risk of requiring urgent care or hospitalization by 90%" in COVID-19 patients. DON'T WAIT UNTIL THE FIRE STARTS TO GET A FIRE EXTINGUISHER. Your home probably has a fire extinguisher, maybe even a few. These are present even though the chance of a fire burning down your house is very low. We use these fire preventative measures to provide an element of safety for our families. In the same way, having the early treatments available at your home will protect your family and potentially keep them out of the hospital. Don't wait until you need it. Get your Defense Boxes now to make sure you and your family will be protected. Be prepared. Not scared. As always, I want to remind you that I am not a doctor, and this information is not being provided to you as medical advice. I am, however, an engineer, and this information is of great importance.

Tune in as I visit with Dr. Ryan Cole on the successes of early treatment monoclonal antibodies. You or a loved one have COVID? Do not wait, call today and make that appointment for an infusion. Monoclonal antibodies are laboratory-produced molecules that act as substitute antibodies to restore, enhance, or mimic the immune system’s function to attack foreign cells. These treatments attack a C-19 protein making it more difficult for the virus to attach to and enter human cells. Over the last year, frontline doctors throughout the US and worldwide have demonstrated that C-19 “early treatment” significantly reduces serious illness and death. While supplements like Quercetin, Vitamins C, B and D3, Zinc, Magnesium, which are well known to boost the body’s natural immune system are very effective, monoclonal antibodies can be of great benefit. These treatments are designed for non-hospitalized adults and children who have recently tested positive for C-19, are within 10 days of symptom onset, and are at high risk for progressing to severe C-19 and/or hospitalization. Share this information! Due to few Texans being aware of monoclonal antibody infusion centers, the purpose of this post is to make as many Texans as possible aware of this FDA approved early treatment and provide the information. To request infusion of monoclonal antibodies, you may call the 24-hour State Infusion Hotline at 1-800-742-5990 or go to the web site https://meds.tdem.texas.gov/.

Tune in as I visit with Emily Cook, a legal expert, who has first hand experience with patients rights in the hospital. Many people end up in the hospital after contracting COVID-19, either because of complications from the virus or secondary conditions. It can be frustrating not knowing how to navigate hospital protocols normally, and even more so with the implementation of many pandemic safety measures. YOU HAVE RIGHTS when it comes to treatment at a hospital. Since it continues to appear that more COVID-19 patients are dying in hospitals because of hospital policies than the COVID-19, it is important that you know your rights, while in a hospital and are prepared for what you will encounter. Hospitals have found themselves at the center of medical issues with regards to treatments plans, prevention protocols, and matters of ethics as the guidance from different government officials, agencies, and scientists has continued to shift over the course of the pandemic. Here's a quick breakdown of what you will hear from Emily Cook, an attorney with Texas Right to Life in this video interview. 1. ACT EARLY If you suspect you have COVID-19, act early. Get tested and, if positive, start treatment immediately. You can begin the Frontline Doctors protocol, apply for monoclonal antibody treatment, if available, and isolate away from others for 10 days. 2. BE PREPARED Have a medical power of attorney and write up an advanced directive that clearly states what treatment you want in the event you are unable to advocate for yourself. You should have this prepared in advance so you don't have to worry about complications with treatment requests if you are hospitalized. The person you designate for your medical power of attorney will be able to advocate for your wishes. If you are admitted to the hospital, let your medical power of attorney person handle the decision making from the beginning. This will eliminate confusion later on if your condition worsens and are no longer able to directly speak to the treatment team. 3. KNOW YOUR DISCHARGE PLAN As soon as you or your loved one is admitted, ask your social worker/case worker what the plan for discharge is. They should be able to tell you this upfront. If you, for any reason, do not agree with the physician's treatment plan, you may choose to leave the hospital. YOU DO NOT NEED A PHYSICIAN'S APPROVAL TO BE DISCHARGED. You may choose to tell them, "I want to discharge against medical advice." This will indicate to the hospital that you are serious about choosing your treatment options and may foster better communication with the hospital team. You have the right to fire your doctor if your treatment requests are being ignored. 4. GET YOUR MEDICAL RECORDS and BE PERSISTENT Ask and ask again. If you have a question, keep asking until you ask the right person and get an answer. Request your medical records, even while still admitted. You can specifically ask for records from the date of admission until the present. This is not standard practice, but you are entitled to your records. 5. VISITATION RIGHTS In 2021, the Texas Legislature passed SB572 which requires hospitals to allow patients unrestricted visitation by “Religious Counselor.” The intent of that legislation was to insure that if you have a belief in a religion and talk with others about that religion you are “Religious Counselor” and cannot be denied access to your loved one in the hospital.

When the C-19 pandemic originally broke out around the world, the things that scared the public the most were the unknown. How contagious was it? How deadly was it? Who was at the most risk? Today I am joined by Dr. Richard Urso, a medical doctor who has had great results with early treatment of the virus and Steven Kirsch, an electrical engineer with two degrees from MIT. Steve is not a physician, but he does understand analyzing data. He will explain why what we do know about the government solution to the C-19 pandemic is even scarier that what we did not know in the beginning. His analysis of the government data shows that a person under 30 is 6 time more likely to die from the vaccine shot than from C-19 and people over 60 are twice as likely to from the vaccine shot as to die from C-19. Analyzed eight different ways, using government and pharmaceutical data, Steve will walk you through the data to reveal that it indicates the vaccines are killing two to three people for every one person saved by the vaccine. Don’t get me wrong, I am not opposed to vaccinations, I am opposed to FORCED vaccinations. I am in full support of individuals having the ability to make a fully informed decision. As always, I want to remind you that I am not a doctor, and this information is not being provided to you as medical advice. I am, however, an engineer, and this data is concerning to say the least.

I believe we are at a pivotal point in history in our stand for liberty. In our generation, individual liberty will be passed on to our children or die on our watch. In a large part, that determination will be made by our stand on the mandates being instituted in response to the pandemic. When the C pandemic swept around the world almost two years ago, everyone was prone to comply with the “government experts” on procedures to shut down the nation to “flatten the curve” of the disease. As time has passed and information has become available, the lockstep obedience to government mandates has waned. Information from medical experts who are working with patients with prevention and early treatment protocols are proving that the “lockdown or die” scenario originally presented was a false choice. Join me as I talk with Dr. Richard Fleming, a physician/scientist with 53 years of experience, about the dangers he is concerned about in the current treatment protocols.

As in all cases, let me preface my comments with the statement that I am not a doctor. However, I do feel like part of my responsibility as your Senator is to bring you information from those doctors who have been working tirelessly over the past 18 months to fight the disease. Today we have Dr. Peter McCullough, one of the most published physicians in the world. He has been at the forefront of the C battle since the beginning, and he is with us again, to give us a five-point update on what we now know that we did not know when the pandemic hit. According to Dr. McCullough: 1. Studies now show that C is not spread asymptomatically. If you are not showing symptoms, you are not spreading the disease. 2. We do not need to be testing asymptomatic individuals. 3. Natural immunity is robust, complete, and durable. If you have recovered from C, you do not need a vaccine, and in fact, 6 studies show that a vaccine can cause harm if you immunize after recovery. 4. C is treatable. Early treatment Monoclonal antibodies and other protocols like Hydroxychloroquine, Ivermectin, Zinc, D3, and Budesonide, have been shown to be highly effective, but you must be prepared. a. You should know the location and hours of infusion treatment centers before you need one. b. Doctors are now better able to treat C at home with the therapeutics recommended by frontline doctors than they were in the beginning of the pandemic. c. Don’t wait. Establish a relationship NOW with the doctor that treats you with these therapies before you actually need them! 5. Vaccines initially appeared good. a. There now appears to be an excessive mortality rate with the vaccine. b. Over 250,000 ER or doctor visits have been for treatment of adverse reactions to the vaccine. c. Young people are more likely to go into the hospital for heart issues after a vaccine than they are to go to the hospital for C. Join in and listen as Dr. McCullough shares his insights and sources for these five points. And, as always, be proactive in protecting your health. As always, if you find this information to be useful, please share this post with all your friends.

Tune in as I visit with the Lockett family. The outcome is a happy ending, however the road to get there has been bumpy. Learn from their story to better prepare. Early Treatment is still key. At this time, with supply chains where they are, it would be prudent to access available items and have them in the medicine cabinet. Do you or someone you know have COVID? You may qualify for the Monoclonal Antibody Infusion Therapy. Visit meds.tdem.texas.gov or call 1-800-742-5990. My objective is to share these stories so together we can learn from both the success stories, as well as the unfortunate stories. I appreciate the courage of these families who are stepping-up to share their stories so that others are better equipped to protect their loved one that has the misfortune of being hospitalized. Think about it, in what other instance are you told to go home and get worse before we can assist you? Unfortunately, the government has inserted itself between the patient and their doctors by discouraging, impeding, and even prohibiting early treatment with the use of safe, effective, readily available, and inexpensive existing drugs in favor late treatment with less effective, high risk, and very expensive experimental drugs. I know I have said it before, but the bottom line take away from this - Be Like a Boy Scout - Be/Get Prepared NOW. Follow the frontline doctors recommendations NOW, BEFORE YOU NEED THEM: 1. Find a doctor who will follow the proven protocols of AAPS and Dr Peter McCullough. If your current doctor will not follow these protocols, find one that does; 2. Acquire the therapeutics recommended by the frontline doctors NOW; 3. As soon as you test positive, no matter how sick you feel, immediately contact the doctor you found in step one; and 4. Begin taking the recommended therapeutics.

EARLY TREATMENT, EARLY TREATMENT and EARLY TREATMENT with effective therapeutics are the three most important keys to surviving C, according Frontline doctors like Peter McCullough, Richard Urso, Ben Edwards, Amy Offutt, Richard Bartlett, Simone Gold and many, many doctors. This is the message from frontline doctors who have actually treated, in the trenches, since early 2020, saving the lives of C patients. Great information on this next video, have a pen and paper handy! These frontline doctors have treated thousands of C patients with extremely high survival rates. These high survival rates are comparable to the high survival rates of other countries that administered similar therapeutics in EARLY TREATMENT. Our frontline hero doctors estimate that had the USA C patients received EARLY TREATMENT with the recommended therapeutics, at least 90% of those who died over the past 18 months could have survived the C. Unfortunately the government got in the way. Throughout medical history, until C came to the USA, the medical community was unified on “preventative and early treatment” as a best practice. Unfortunately, government has inserted itself between the patient and their doctors by discouraging, impeding, and even prohibiting early treatment with the use of safe, effective, readily available and inexpensive existing drugs in favor late treatment with less effective, high risk, and very expensive experimental drugs. Join me as I visit with Jodi Carroll on her firsthand family experience with her mom. My objective is to share these stories so we can learn from both the success stories, as well as the unfortunate stories. I appreciate the courage of these surviving family members who are stepping-up to share their stories of abuse, neglect, and malpractice so that others are better equipped to protect their loved one that has the misfortune of being hospitalized. The bottom line take away from this video - Be Like a Boy Scout - Be Prepared. Follow the frontline doctors recommendations NOW, BEFORE YOU NEED THEM: 1. Find a doctor who will follow the proven protocols of AAPS and Dr Peter McCullough. If your current doctor will not follow these protocols, fire them and find one that does; 2. Acquire the therapeutics recommended by the frontline doctors NOW; 3. As soon as you test positive, no matter how sick you feel, immediately contact the doctor you found in step one; and 4. Begin taking the recommended therapeutics. The next steps are what I plan to do if I was inadvertently hospitalized, but you and your doctor have to decide for yourself: 5. NO HOSPITAL - I personally, will not under any circumstance go to a hospital for C; 6. NO REMDESIVIR - I will direct the hospital that I am to not be given Remdesivir; 7. NO VENTILATOR - I will refuse to be intubated; and 8. LEAVE HOSPITAL ASAP - I or my wife will do what ever it takes to leave the hospital and go home or to a doctor that will treat my C-19 symptoms with the therapeutics that work. Please share this FB post far and wide. Our previous videos are archived on our website at www.SenatorBobHall.com

Why is it that the United States has one of the best health care systems in the world, and yet is reporting one of the highest number of deaths per million in the world? Could it be our treatment choices? Could it be that most hospitalized C patients who die, do so because of hospital policies not of the C virus? According to Dr. Bryan Ardis the United States has, one of the highest C death rates, per capita of any country in the world and the hospitals in the United States are the leading (if not the only) current users of a drug called Remdesivir to treat hospitalized C patients. In this interview, Dr. Ardis explains why he is appalled that Remdesivir is even being used to treat covid patient since it was pulled from use when, in a previous trial with Ebola patients, 49% of those taking the drug died. One of the well-known adverse side effects of the drug is irreparable kidney and liver damage One possible reason hospitals are quick to use Remdesivir is that the Federal Government pays hospitals an "add-on" payment for treatment of each C patient, regardless of whether they live or die. No other therapeutic such as Ivermectin, earns the hospital a bonus. The World Health Organization has made a conditional recommendation against the U.S. gold standard C treatment drug, Remdesivir, citing that the evidence around the benefits and risks of an intervention are less certain. The National Institute of Health has acknowledged that its effectiveness has not been rigorously studied in clinical trials. Those theoretical reasons, along with the FDA approval of Remesdivir, incentivized with increased government add-on payments (as much as a 40 percent increase) for the health care industries to use new, approved treatments for C, make it is easy to understand why it has become the primary drug of choice. It always bears repeating, I am not a medical doctor. Medical studies, like statistics, can often be found to make any point you might want to make. My point in bringing these videos to you is to give you access to differing points of perspective than you may hear from mainstream media. Always check the information provided by me¬–or anyone else¬–for yourself. Do not just take my word for it. Tune in today to listen to Dr. Ardis discuss the studies that indicate that the top choice of drugs for treatment in the United States has had clinical studies ended early due to the adverse death rate in the studies and could possibly be the primary reason that hospital death rate for C patients is so high.

While the argument about the efficacy and safety of vaccines is at the forefront of the COVID discussions, people are dying in hospitals, not because of the COVID, but because of hospital policy. Vaccinated or not vaccinated, everyone testing COVID positive, deserves to be treated with the therapeutics (drugs) that work. Since no drug has formal FDA approval for COVID treatment (only emergency use authorization) all doctors should be free to use their medical judgement in using existing drugs, off label. Unfortunately, most hospitals are refusing to allow their doctors to treat COVID patients with existing, safe, and effective drugs that many private practice doctors have been successfully using since soon after the initial COVID outbreak. As more people become aware of the available treatments like, Ivermectin, hydroxoycholorine, and Budesonide and the success being achieved through outpatient private practice doctors, they are becoming frustrated when their loved one is hospitalized for COVID where hospital policies prohibit the use of theses safe and effective drugs. The bottom line is, COVID patients, who make the mistake of seeking help from a hospital rather a private practice doctor, that are successfully using these drugs, are unnecessarily dying. Fortunately, we now have surviving family members who are stepping-up to share their stories of abuse, neglect, and malpractice so that others are better equipped to protect their loved one that has the misfortune of being hospitalized. Today, we have the firsthand testimony from Karen Brown. She will share with us how she was lied to by hospital doctors and administrators as they violated strict orders to not intubate and refused to effectively treat her husband who eventually died. I appreciate her courage in sharing her experience for the benefit of others. Please share this FB post far and wide. Our previous COVID videos are archived on our web site at www.SenatorBobHall.com

Hospitals across Texas are leading the way to a whole new form of fraud, waste and abuse of taxpayer money with their self-inflicted medical personnel shortage. As summer draws to a close and the Delta variant of the COVID-19 cases, including many vaccinated, increase across the state, hospitals once again find themselves in need of additional staffing resources. Recent news articles are reporting conflicting accounts of whether the state will continue to offer relief staff to local hospitals or whether local entities will be asked to help with staffing. This hospital medical personnel shortage, has been caused in part by hospitals demanding that all nurses and other medical professionals be vaccinated or fired. Thus, many nurses and other medical personnel have chosen to quit or be fired rather than take the risk of an experimental vaccine that already has broken all records for adverse reactions and deaths. This has created a nursing shortage which, in turn, has prompted hospitals to seek financial help from the government to help pay for a problem that they themselves created and continue to exasperate. What We Know Federal relief funds to the state have already paid $5.36 billion for staffing relief for nurses and other health care personnel in hospitals that were being overwhelmed with COVID-19 cases. The staffing was essential for services and the process took the pressure off the hospitals for hiring personnel. The facility told the state how many staffers they needed, and the workers showed up. Hospitals, through local officials, are once again appealing to the state for financial help. This time the State initially told local entities it was not going to restart the state-supported nursing program, but instead, local cities and counties should use the $10.5 billion in coronavirus recovery funds allocated to them by Congress to use it where they most needed it, including with medical staffing agencies and to replace the nurses who were fired or quit because of the vaccine mandated by hospitals. Then, in an about face on August 11, Governor Abbott announced that the state would fully fund (at exorbitant rates) a surge of 2,500 medical personnel through September 30. Behind the Scenes What changed behind the scenes to make the state want to push the hiring procedures to the local level? The cost of doing business. In any market supply and demand will dictate the cost of a product. Low supply generally increases the cost. But a high supply of available funding (think college tuition loans) will raise the cost of the product without a corresponding increase in value. In this case, the hospitals continued a shrinkage of the nursing personnel pool by demanding “be vaccinated or be fired”. The number of medical personnel did not increase with the $5.36 billion influx of funds, but the opportunity for staffing agencies did. In reported instances, staffing companies recruited workers at hospitals and offered them higher salaries than they were currently making. The state then paid the higher rate for the same employee, plus the overhead costs of the staffing agencies to place them back in the same position they had before. That meant that a lot of opportunities were used to squander available taxpayer dollars when the money could have been used to fund even more additional staffing. You cannot fault a worker for making the decision to get a raise, but it is a losing proposition for the taxpayer. One thought is that it might be more difficult to incentivize the bait and switch if all the negotiations are done at the local level. Local staffing agencies may have more difficulty poaching workers in the community. Creating an economic opportunity for third parties was not the intended outcome for the federal funding of additional medical staffing. But all government programs have unintended consequences. The consequence off the hospitals “be vaxxed or be fired” is costing Texas taxpayers a lot of money.