PoliticalIslam

How many times have you heard this, Islam just needs reform. Well, why does it need reform? Well, then it would be nicer without that jihad business. So let's just reform it. It is impossible to reform Islam. It's almost like a mathematical business. But, Christianity and Judaism were reformed, therefore Islam can be reformed. Well, not really. Let's say that you're gonna reform Islam by picking out the good and dropping what is bad, and you're the one deciding what is good and bad. Well this Islam you're gonna pick and choose from, what is it? It's the Quran, Sira, and Hadith, so therefore if you're gonna reform Islam, you have to reform the Quran, the Sira, or the Hadith. Let's start with the Quran. What does it say about itself? Quran 3:7, "No one knows the true interpretation except Allah," that's the interpretation of the Quran, "but those firm in knowledge say" we believe in it, all of it is from our Lord." So since every verse comes from Allah, who are you to pick and choose amongst it? Here's an example that you don't even know how to pick and choose anyway. Quran 2:216, "Fighting is prescribed for you, and you dislike it. "But it is possible that you dislike a thing" which is good for you and that you love a thing "which is bad for you." So therefore you are the person picking and choosing, Allah says you don't know how to pick and choose anyway. Quran 11:1. "This is a book who verses are perfect." So every verse is perfect, who are you to say they're not? Quran 5:3. "This day I perfected for you your religion "and completed my favor upon you" and have approved for you Islam as a religion." Its religion is perfect. That includes the Quran and Sunna. What are you gonna do about that? How do you reform perfection? Look, Islam is perfect in its entirety and in each individual part. Every verse, every sentence, every Hadith is perfect. Muhammad is a perfect model for a human life. There are 91 verses in the Quran which say so. So therefore his Sunna is perfection. There's no good Sunna and bad Sunna. It's all Allah's perfection. But let's say you're so brilliant that you're smarter than Allah, and you're smarter than Muhammad, and you come up with this brilliant plan for reformation. So what, who do you go to? There's no authoritative body to approve or disprove. You can't go to Al-Azhar because they don't have any real authority. They're just a group of scholars issuing opinions. There is no central body that can issue changes in Islam, so your brilliant reformation plan doesn't have anywhere to go, no one cares. Now look, you say we need to reform Islam because it will make Islam whatever we mean by this, nice. So the part you want to remove is jihad. Now in Mecca, there is no jihad, but in the Medina in Quran, 24% of it is about jihad. In Bukhari's Hadith, 21% are about jihad, and the Sira 67%, or 2/3. This is not a verse or two, this is a systemic problem. It is a doctrine that you need to change, and you can't change it with a sentence or a verse or two. Islam is not what a Muslim says, it's what Muhammad says. So therefore you can't go to ask some Muslim, well here's what I think a reformation would be, and he would go, oh I think you're right. There's 1 1/2 billion Muslims, so which one are you gonna ask for to approve of your plan for reformation? Whereas when we quote Muhammad, it is objective. Now look, we've all met nice pleasant Muslims, and so we say well look, if Muslims are nice, there is a nice Islam they're following. No, they're not following all of Islam. They're just practicing the Islam that's found in Mecca, not in Medina. Nice Muslims cannot condemn or say Medina is wrong, they just don't practice it. But that's not reforming, it's just not doing what it says. Now remember this too, Muhammad was a failure until he came up with jihad. His career, was 13 years in Mecca preaching the religion of Islam, no jihad, but only 150 followers. About 10 a year. Then when he turned to jihad and politics, he was an overwhelming success... (for the entire transcript go to www.politicalislam.com). Sign up for Bill Warner PhD's newsletter at https://politicalislam.com Buy Bill's books at: https://politicalislam.com/shop Follow Bill Warner PhD: Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/billwarnerauthor/ X: https://twitter.com/PoliticalIslam Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/politicalislam https://vimeo.com/user40284186 Soundcloud: https://soundcloud.com/user-460569656

Islam claims to have the supreme ethical system in the Sharia. Exactly, what is the system of Sharia and how does it compare with the UN Declaration of Human Rights of 1948? Under the Sharia: · Humans are not equal · Critical thought is rejected · Torture is allowed · Only Muslims have the right to life · There is one law for Muslims, another law for Kafirs · Children can be brides · A Muslim woman cannot marry a Kafir · Apostates can be killed · There is no freedom of speech · Inbreeding is encouraged · Wife beating is allowed Conclusion: Sharia rights are inhuman and inferior to the UN Declarations of Human Rights. Sign up for Bill Warner PhD's newsletter at https://politicalislam.com Buy Bill's books at: https://politicalislam.com/shop Follow Bill Warner PhD: Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/billwarnerauthor/ X: https://twitter.com/PoliticalIslam Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/politicalislam https://vimeo.com/user40284186 Soundcloud: https://soundcloud.com/user-460569656

Bill Warner PhD lectures on Political Islam in Chattanooga, TN.

Kafir Net is a new type of website that allows us to work together to defeat political Islam. Watch this video for an introduction to a new concept for victory. http://www.kfrnet.com Sign up for Bill Warner PhD's newsletter at https://politicalislam.com Buy Bill's books at: https://politicalislam.com/shop Follow Bill Warner PhD: Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/billwarnerauthor/ X: https://twitter.com/PoliticalIslam Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/politicalislam https://vimeo.com/user40284186 Soundcloud: https://soundcloud.com/user-460569656

Islam is not so strong, but we are so weak because we can no longer debate in the universities. Islam is protected in the universities. There is little critical thought about Islam in theology, sociology, women's studies, history, slavery history, or Sharia. We are weak because the pastors refuse to support the persecuted religious minorities, including Christians, in Islamic lands. Pastors do not teach the young how not to marry Muslims or avoid conversion to Islam. Most churches do not try to convert Muslims. Schools and pastors teach about Islam in such a way that no Muslim is offended. If the professors and pastors were brave enough to do their job, we would defeat Islam. Sign up for Bill Warner PhD's newsletter at https://politicalislam.com Buy Bill's books at: https://politicalislam.com/shop Follow Bill Warner PhD: Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/billwarnerauthor/ X: https://twitter.com/PoliticalIslam Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/politicalislam https://vimeo.com/user40284186 Soundcloud: https://soundcloud.com/user-460569656

When jihad came to the US on 9/11, we knew almost nothing about Islam. Our teachers, law enforcement, media, and military knew nothing about Islamic doctrine, except at the National Geographic level. Those who were supposed to be the educational pillars of our civilization, the professors and intellectuals, told us that Islam was the religion of peace and that we were the problem. The classical scholars were apologists for Islam. When jihad came to the US on 9/11, we knew almost nothing about Islam. Our teachers, law enforcement, media, and military knew nothing about Islamic doctrine, except at the National Geographic level. Those who were supposed to be the educational pillars of our civilization, the professors and intellectuals, told us that Islam was the religion of peace and that we were the problem. The classical scholars were apologists for Islam. Then a revolution happened. Self-taught scholars began to write books and blogs. This new knowledge had a novel feature: their books were written for the common man to read. Previous scholarship from the academy was written for other tenured professors to read. There was another new feature of the self-taught scholarship—it was about the foundations of Islam—the Koran and the Sunna of Mohammed. Academic scholarship about Islam is based on opinions from complex experts that make watching paint dry seem exciting. This is a second self-taught revolution that is comparable to the first self-taught scholarship that gave us classical physics and chemistry. Newton did not learn calculus and classical mechanics at school. No, he created the concepts. He was self-taught. All discoveries and creations are self-taught. No one taught Benjamin Franklin that lightning was electricity, he was self-taught by doing experiments. So the intellectual push back against political Islam did not come from professionals, but self-taught amateurs. Another analogy about these self-taught scholars is that they are like intellectual guerilla fighters. Today, if Trump understood the self-taught revolution against Sharia, he would harness the talent that has withstood the onslaught of the Muslim Brotherhood, without any support from government. Think of what could happen if people such as Robert Spenser and other warrior scholars were given access to federal law enforcement, military, State Department, and intelligence agencies. Sign up for Bill Warner PhD's newsletter at https://politicalislam.com Buy Bill's books at: https://politicalislam.com/shop Follow Bill Warner PhD: Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/billwarnerauthor/ X: https://twitter.com/PoliticalIslam Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/politicalislam https://vimeo.com/user40284186 Soundcloud: https://soundcloud.com/user-460569656

When a jihadist attacked the Louvre Museum in Paris he intended to do more than kill people. He carried paint bombs. His intent was to destroy the finest art of Western civilization. Why art? Art that involves animals or humans is forbidden in the Sharia. Art is the work of Kafirs and is part of jahiliyya (civilization of ignorance). Islam annihilates a civilization piece by piece and leaves nothing of its native roots. Civilizational jihad destroys the very cultural history of every nation it comes into contact with. We see the jihadist annihilation of museums and ancient architecture for the same reason. This civilizational war has been this way for 1400 years. [This interview was posted first on Gates of Vienna.] Sign up for Bill Warner PhD's newsletter at https://politicalislam.com Buy Bill's books at: https://politicalislam.com/shop Follow Bill Warner PhD: Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/billwarnerauthor/ X: https://twitter.com/PoliticalIslam Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/politicalislam https://vimeo.com/user40284186 Soundcloud: https://soundcloud.com/user-460569656

We hear that moderate Muslims are the solution to radical Islam. But when we examine this idea one step at a time, it will not work. Radical Muslims want Sharia, but moderate Muslims reject Sharia. Radical Muslims want jihad, moderate Muslims reject jihad. And so on. But the problem is that all of the things that radicals want are pure Islam. And every radical idea that moderate Muslims reject is pure Islam. Moderation simply means rejecting the doctrine. Moderation is a form of apostasy. How can moderates reform what they reject? Moderate Muslims are not Islamic and are not capable of reforming Islam. There is no moderate Islam; there is no radical Islam. There is only Islam. Sign up for Bill Warner PhD's newsletter at https://politicalislam.com Buy Bill's books at: https://politicalislam.com/shop Follow Bill Warner PhD: Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/billwarnerauthor/ X: https://twitter.com/PoliticalIslam Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/politicalislam https://vimeo.com/user40284186 Soundcloud: https://soundcloud.com/user-460569656

To vet Muslims don't talk about Islam; instead, talk about the fruit of Islam. Here is an example: wife beating. No apologist can support wife beating, but wife beating is found in the Koran and the Hadith. Koran 4:34 Men have authority over women because Allah has made the one superior to the other, and ... send them to beds apart and beat them. Then if they obey you, take no further action against them. Dawood #2142 Umar reported the prophet as saying: "A man will not be asked as to why he beats his wife". I object to any wife-beating doctrine. I don't want immigrants/Muslims who believe in wife beating to be my neighbor. The Islamic doctrine supports slavery, torture, Kafirs must submit to Sharia, wife beating, inferiority of women, political assassin. I reject Sharia, wife beating, torture, and killing of Kafirs. Notice that I do not say I reject Muslims. So ask an apologist: Do you support wife beating? Assassination? Killing apostates? You say you don't know enough to quote the Koran and Hadith. Then go ask Imam Google. The hadith and Koran verse I used came from web searching: "wife beating Koran". Finding this kind of information used to be hard, but now it is simple. Why do we want to bring in anybody who buys into wife beating, the inferiority of Kafirs, assassinations? So, deal with the fruit of Islam, not Islam. Ask the apologist to agree with this evil fruit of the doctrine, for instance, the wife beating. Notice the method: Talk about the source doctrine and its fruit. Is it fair to ask if a Muslim follows the doctrine? If not, will they condemn it? Sign up for Bill Warner PhD's newsletter at https://politicalislam.com Buy Bill's books at: https://politicalislam.com/shop Follow Bill Warner PhD: Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/billwarnerauthor/ X: https://twitter.com/PoliticalIslam Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/politicalislam https://vimeo.com/user40284186 Soundcloud: https://soundcloud.com/user-460569656

I would like to announce a new CSPI online program, the Warner Study Network. The web address is learn.politicalislam.com. It is NOT www.learn.politicalislam.com. This program teaches Islamic doctrine through a storytelling method. You listen and/or read Islamic doctrine, review current events through a doctrinal lens, and join a learning community to discuss the material. If you take the courses and are not satisfied, your money will be refunded. The price is $30.00 and you will have access to five of my books. Sign up for Bill Warner PhD's newsletter at https://politicalislam.com Buy Bill's books at: https://politicalislam.com/shop Follow Bill Warner PhD: Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/billwarnerauthor/ X: https://twitter.com/PoliticalIslam Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/politicalislam https://vimeo.com/user40284186 Soundcloud: https://soundcloud.com/user-460569656

Why are so many Muslim refugees coming to the US? Why do so few persecuted Christians come? The answer is the position of the churches. The biggest door into US society is the church door. The Christians and Jews love to attend interfaith gatherings where they sit and nod their heads yes to all that the Muslims say. But the Christian and Jewish leaders are ignorant about Islam. They know nothing about the Islamic doctrine of Christian and Jew hatred. But what is worse is that they refuse to learn. Christian leaders have developed a doctrine of the coward to justify their pious ignorance and fear. They are all about turning the other cheek, loving their enemies, and doing nothing while waiting for Jesus to return. They are incapable of boldness and courage. Wimps all (well, about 95% of them). And if you are not a Christian, why aren't you concerned with the greatest human rights tragedy happening today, the killing of religious minorities in Islamic lands? Why can't persecuted Christians come as refugees to America? When will Christians care about the persecution of their own brothers and sisters? What has happened to us (Christians, Jews, Buddhists, atheists, and all others) that we are no longer able to have moral outrage? Righteous anger?

A jihadi said that beheading Kafirs, non-Muslims, is like killing chickens so he has no remorse. And why would he feel nothing? Could it be that he believes that Kafirs are worse than animals? Allah says: Koran 25:44 Do you think that most of them hear, or understand? They are just like animals; no, they are far worse. The jihadi has the moral right to behead the Kafir. He is following Allah's commands: Koran 8:12 Then your Lord spoke to His angels and said, "I will be with you. Give strength to the believers. I will send terror into the Kafirs' hearts, cut off their heads and even the tips of their fingers!" In the early Koran of Mecca, Allah condemns Kafirs to hell 146 times. Of these 146 condemnations, only 9 involve moral wrongs such as greed and lying. The other 137 times are because the Kafir did not think that Mohammed was the prophet of Allah. Kafirs reject Mohammed as a prophet and deny the Koran. Killing them by beheading is jihad. Raping them is jihad. The jihad advances Islam. There are other chickens (cowards), as well. Chicken religious leaders do not stand up for persecuted Christians. There is a chicken media that does not tell the truth about Islam or criticize it. And there are chicken professors who do not teach the truth of the suffering in history caused by jihad over the last 1400 years. We must stop being chicken cowards. We may have fear, but we must speak out. Only then can we prevent our civilization from being annihilated. ----------------------------------- Like killing a chicken: Trauma Expert on Mission to Record ISIS Horror Stories, Don Snyder, 9/22/2015, FoxNews.com

I have been called an Islamophobe. Now, what does that mean? A phobia is an irrational fear, but what is the Islam I am phobic about? Islam is the doctrine found in the Koran and the Sunna of Mohammed. What am I afraid of in the Koran? Certainly not anything found in the early Koran of Mecca, since all it says is that I am going to hell since I am a Kafir. But in Medina, the Koran tells me about "fighting in Allah's cause", and killing Kafirs in jihad. As a Kafir, should I be afraid of jihad? Or is that a phobia? The Koran says that Allah will terrorize Kafirs. So am I phobic to fear terror? The Koran says that as a Kafir I can be beheaded. I see pictures of Kafirs being beheaded around the world. Should I be afraid or is it phobic to fear beheading? Reading the Sunna of Mohammed, I find he ordered his critics to be assassinated. Is it phobic to fear assassination? The Koran says that I can be crucified. Should I fear crucifixion? Or is that phobic? Mohammed killed each and every person who opposed him. I oppose Islam, which includes the Sunna of Mohammed, should I be afraid, or is that phobic? I am afraid of violence from Islam. Am I reasonable or am I phobic? What about you?

As Syrian refugees and other migrants are being brought to the US, we hear that we don't need to worry about any nasty "terrorists" (jihadists, to use the right word), because they will be vetted. We are worrying about the wrong kind of jihad. The "terrorist" is the least of our worries. Instead, we need to concern ourselves about the jihad of the increasing demands and use of Sharia. It is the Sharia that annihilates a native civilization. For example, before the Sharia, Turkey was a Christian civilization. Today it is 99.7% Muslim. It was jihad that put the Sharia in place, and then, over the centuries, Christianity was annihilated. Our vetting needs to focus on the Sharia, not just violence. The US has taken a stand against racial hatred, why not take a stand against Kafir hatred? We need to say no to Sharia wife-beating, no to Sharia Kafir hatred, no to the Sharia killing of apostates, no to Sharia suppression of free speech, no to Sharia abuse of women. When Islam came to Medina in the first migration, Medina was half Jewish and with some Arab Muslims. Five years later, Medina was totally Islamic and with no Jews. Annihilation by migration and Sharia is pure Sunna. Why do we want American citizens who think our Constitution is haram (Sharia forbidden) and that Kafirs are scum? We need to vet all migrants and insist they repudiate political Sharia. The oath of citizenship should read: I hereby declare, on oath, that I absolutely and entirely renounce and abjure all allegiance and fidelity to any foreign prince, potentate, state, sovereignty, religious legal system of whom or which I have heretofore been a subject or citizen. Sign up for Bill Warner PhD's newsletter at https://politicalislam.com Buy Bill's books at: https://politicalislam.com/shop Follow Bill Warner PhD: Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/billwarnerauthor/ X: https://twitter.com/PoliticalIslam Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/politicalislam https://vimeo.com/user40284186 Soundcloud: https://soundcloud.com/user-460569656

The first key is do not use the Koran and Allah, because the Koran is structured to be hard to understand. Instead, use the Sunna of Mohammed. The Koran says 91 times that Mohammed is the perfect Muslim and he is very easy to understand. We find Mohammed in his traditions, the Hadith, and his biography, the Sira. When we use Mohammed to explain Islam, we do what the Koran commands. Some Muslims might say that a particular hadith may not be valid (meaning they don't like what it says), but know that almost every hadith that I use is called Sahih (authentic) since I use Bukhari and Abu Muslim. Sometimes you meet a Muslim who rejects all of the Sunna, so how do you use Mohammed? Simple, the Koran by itself cannot be understood by any person, without knowing the life of Mohammed. No Mohammed equals no understanding of the Koran. Actually, there is an oddity about the Koran. It is said to be the perfect, exact words of Allah. However, the perfect Koran cannot be understood without knowing Mohammed. However, the life of Mohammed and his traditions were written by people who never met him but wrote down what they heard from others. In a court of law, this is called hearsay. Hearsay is usually not admissible in our courts. So the perfect book cannot be understood without evidence that cannot be used in our courts. Odd, isn't it?

It is frequently said that moderate Muslims can solve the problem of jihad and terror. Everyone has met nice Muslims, some of whom are willing to admit that Islam has problems and may even say that the Islamic State is bad. Moderate Muslims are nice people who come to interfaith events, interviews, and talks at schools and churches. Moderate Muslims even tell us that they are the real victim, not the Kafir. Here is the problem, Islam cannot be changed by anybody, moderate or not. Islam is the civilizational doctrine found in the Koran, Sira, and Hadith. Nobody can change the Sunna and the Koran. Their words are eternal, perfect, and universal. Nobody can change Islam. It is fixed and frozen by its unalterable doctrine. What we call moderation is simply ignoring the violence and hate. But the jihad cannot be removed, it can only be denied by ignoring it. A moderate has the same Allah and Mohammed that a jihadist has. Moderate Islam is Islam light, Islam ignored. Islam changes Muslims; Muslims can only choose not to practice the dark side of Islam, but they cannot change it or get rid of it. Islamic doctrine is fixed, eternal, unchangeable, and forever.

The first key is to not use the Koran and Allah because the Koran is structured to be hard to understand. Instead, use the Sunna of Mohammed. The Koran says 91 times that Mohammed is the perfect Muslim and he is very easy to understand. We find Mohammed in his traditions, the Hadith, and his biography, the Sira. When we use Mohammed to explain Islam, we do what the Koran commands. Every hadith that I use is called Sahih (authentic) since I use Bukhari and Abu Muslim. Sometimes you meet a Muslim who rejects all of the Sunna, so how do you use Mohammed? Simple, the Koran by itself cannot be understood by any person, without knowing the life of Mohammed. No Mohammed equals no understanding of the Koran. The Koran is the perfect, exact words of Allah. However, the perfect Koran cannot be understood without knowing Mohammed. However, the life of Mohammed and his traditions were written by people who never met him but wrote down what they heard from others. In a court of law, this is called hearsay. Hearsay is not admissible in our courts. So the perfect book cannot be understood without evidence that cannot be used in our courts. Odd, isn't it? Sign up for Bill Warner PhD's newsletter at https://politicalislam.com Buy Bill's books at: https://politicalislam.com/shop Follow Bill Warner PhD: Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/billwarnerauthor/ X: https://twitter.com/PoliticalIslam Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/politicalislam https://vimeo.com/user40284186 Soundcloud: https://soundcloud.com/user-460569656

When Muslims assassinate Kafirs who offend Islam, they are following Mohammed's perfect example. Any Muslim is permitted to carry out the death sentence, vigilante justice. This is why there was an attempted assassination at Pam Geller's Garland, TX event. But what is the perfect Sunna on assassinations? There are five examples of Mohammed ordering people to be murdered because of what they said about him. There was a Jewish poet, an Arab poetess, dancing girls who sang satirical songs, a tribal chief who was planning to fight Mohammed, and another Jew who offended Mohammed. So the next time a Kafir who offends Islam is killed, it is because of Mohammed's standing orders.

Islamic State, IS, has written an article about sex slaves in their magazine Dibiq. Now apologists for Islam say that IS has nothing to do with Islam. But IS makes it very clear that when they capture Kafir women and rape them they are only doing what Mohammed did. They quote four verses in the Koran about how Kafir women can be captured and used for sex. Mohammed had sex slaves and his closest companions had sex slaves. Islamic State reminds Muslims that one of the benefits of sex slavery is that they convert to Islam to gain their freedom and produce Muslim children. Islamic State is pure Islam. https://clarionproject.org/docs/isis-isil-islamic-state-magazine-issue+9-they-plot-and-allah-plots-sex-slavery.pdf

CAIR, Council of American Islamic Relations, has issued guidelines on how not to talk about jihad. Do not blame all Muslims for terrorism, but there is no need to blame any Muslims. The blame is the Islamic jihad doctrine. But there is something that all Muslims share - the same doctrine, the same Koran, and the same Sunna of Mohammed. The second recommendation was to not call terrorists jihadists. I agree. A Black Lives Terrorist is not a jihadist. However, if you are killing Kafirs while shouting "Allahu akbar", then you are not a terrorist, but a jihadist. Everything CAIR said is true. Don't blame all Muslims, blame Islam, and don't call a jihadist a terrorist.

How did Islam begin to dominate? We have to understand that North Africa used to be Christian, Iraq used to be Christian, Persia was half Christian, and Egypt, so all these countries used to be Christian and more, and yet they're not today. How did this happen? Precisely, what had to happen for this to take place? This is what we're going to learn in this lecture because it is the creation of the Islamic lands that is what drives the church today to be what it is, timid, ignorant, and unwilling to learn. Now, you've heard it said that the Roman Empire collapsed because the German tribes had invaded and then some of the classical civilizations just began to disappear, but we can see here at this time, the Rome has collapsed, but that the Byzantine Empire, which is centered in Constantinople, and today what we call Turkey, was pulling together a political empire again. For the entire transcript, go to www.politicalislam.com. Sign up for Bill Warner PhD's newsletter at https://politicalislam.com Buy Bill's books at: https://politicalislam.com/shop Follow Bill Warner PhD: Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/billwarnerauthor/ X: https://twitter.com/PoliticalIslam Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/politicalislam https://vimeo.com/user40284186 Soundcloud: https://soundcloud.com/user-460569656

As it does with everything in life, Islam has its own views about migration. For us, migration is for an individual's gain, a better job, for instance. But for Islam, migration was the beginning of Mohammed's success. He preached the religion for 13 years and converted 150 Arabs to Islam. After he migrated to Medina, he became and politician and jihadist, which led to every Arab in Arabia becoming a Muslim. After Mohammed's death, Islam exploded out of Arabia in its second migration. When Islam settles into a society, the society becomes all Islamic (with a couple of exceptions: Spain and the Balkans). Islam does not assimilate but dominates. This is because of its Sharia law. The purpose of migration is to start jihad and the purpose of jihad is to install the Sharia. Under the Sharia, the other religions are subjected to taxes, domination, and humiliation. After enough time, everyone will become a Muslim. Today in the West, we see the beginning of the annihilation of our civilization due to the deference we pay to Islamic migration and Sharia and we refuse to see the true nature and goals of Islam's complete domination of all aspects of our society. *Correction: at around minute 11:00, I misspeak. I say "jihad" and I meant to say "Jew hatred" in Mein Kampf. The graph is correct. Sign up for Bill Warner PhD's newsletter at https://politicalislam.com Buy Bill's books at: https://politicalislam.com/shop Follow Bill Warner PhD: Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/billwarnerauthor/ X: https://twitter.com/PoliticalIslam Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/politicalislam https://vimeo.com/user40284186 Soundcloud: https://soundcloud.com/user-460569656

Totalitarianism is a political doctrine that seeks to control all aspects of a society, its economy, its laws and government, and its culture. Islam is a complete way of life, a total civilization, not just a religion. It is also a culture and a political system of Sharia laws that establish its supremacy. There is no aspect of personal and public life that is not included in the Sharia. Not just Muslims but all people must submit to the Sharia. The very name, Islam, means to submit, submit to Mohammed and the Koran in all things: religious, political, and cultural. Mohammed practiced totalitarianism. All the people around him had to submit to his demands. After Arabia submitted, Mohammed left Arabia and began his mission to have Sharia rule the world. Both the Koran and Mohammed command the terror of jihad on non-Muslims or Kafirs until Islam dominates. After Mohammed died, the caliphs killed all apostates and conquered all the Middle East and northern Africa. After Islam enters a society, over time, the society becomes totally Islamic. This is totalitarianism.

We know we are learning the truth about the Sharia because Muslims are telling us that we don't understand it. A Washington Post guest writer put forth a refutation of the myths about the Sharia. Of course, he makes deceptive arguments about Islam. The Sharia is a process of applying the Sunna of Mohammed and the Koran to everyday needs. It is a method of forcing every human to live a life just like Mohammed, down to the smallest detail. No country bases all of its laws on the Sharia because the Sharia is not sophisticated enough to work in the modern world. The Sharia is anti-woman because it includes wife-beating, polygamy, and sex slaves. Mohammed was involved in all of these. The punishments of Mohammed included the brutality of assassinations, executions, torture, and enslavement. Sharia includes conquest because of the fact that Mohammed did not achieve real success until he waged jihad. To know the Sharia, you must know Mohammed, because Sharia is Mohammed's law. And the worst part is that the Sharia subjugates the Kafir.

Bill Warner PhD criticizes the Christian and Jewish religious leaders apologizing for the "religion of peace."