PoliticalIslam

Every time jihadis kill Kafirs, our leaders and Muslims launch another "Don't blame Muslims" campaign. The latest campaign is presented by Omar Alnatour. He takes the approach that Muslims should not apologize for what criminals do because terrorists have nothing to do with Islam. OA: "Radicals have hijacked his religion" If a Muslim imitates Mohammed, he is following the Sunna, which the Koran commands Muslims to do. It is not a crime if you do what Mohammed did. OA: "Islam teaches peace" Islam does preach peace, but it also preaches jihad. Mohammed rose to power on politics and jihad, not peace. OA: "Islam says not to kill the innocents" Yes, but Kafirs are guilty of rejecting Mohammed and are not innocent. OA: "Muslims are not terrorists" No, Muslims are called to be jihadis, not terrorists. The Koran devotes 24% of the Medinan Koran to jihad. OA: "Muslims condemn terrorism" Perhaps, but will Muslims acknowledge that they cannot condemn what Mohammed did? They cannot condemn Mohammed's jihad. OA: "Good Muslims have no relationship with terrorists" Peaceful Muslims say the same prayers, read the same Koran, and follow the Sunna as the jihadis. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/omar-alnatour/why-muslims-should-never-have-to-apologize_b_9526296.html http://www.politicalislam.com/acknowledge-dont-apologize/"

Many people know friendly and charming Muslims. The same people then believe that Islam could not condone jihad, since the Muslims they know are so nice. Wake up to the fact that Muslims do not create Islam. Muslims only choose what parts of Islam they want to practice. Even if every Muslim in the world voted to not practice some part of Islam, Islam would not change. Islamic doctrine is perfect, eternal, and complete and is changeless. The other problem is that Kafirs do not know what jihad is and think that jihad is only about violence. No, jihad is the struggle to establish Sharia law. It is also a civilizational struggle that includes money, speech, and the written word. The Koran, Sira, and Hadith all lay out the complete form of jihad. You must study Islam, not Muslims.

The easy way to understand Islam is to know Mohammed's life story. It is an incredible story that changed the history of the world, and it is even more powerful today. Mohammed is pure Islam. Ninety-one verses in the Koran say that every Muslim is to imitate Mohammed in all things. Is sex slavery Islamic? Look to Mohammed. He had sex slaves, so when the Islamic state has sex slaves, it is Islamic. What are women's rights in Islam? Look to Mohammed. He said that women could be beaten, had to always obey their husbands, and could be part of a harem. He also said that slaves were to be treated well.

Bill Maher is a self-declared liberal who has the courage and sense to condemn Islam's brutality against women. And Mr. Maher gets the same response from liberals that I get. He is called a bigot. But, look at what Islam does to liberal principles. I used Wikipedia to get this list: Freedom of speech: Sharia does not allow anybody to say anything negative about Mohammed and Allah. Freedom of press: Mohammed cartoons. Freedom of religion: An apostate from Islam can be killed. Even an atheist wants people to be free to choose what they believe. Civil rights: all non-Muslims are Kafirs, who are third-class subjects under Sharia law. Democratic society: A Kafir does not have the same rights as a Muslim under Islam. Secular governments: Secular is not Sharia. The Islamic government is a theocracy. Why do liberals and progressives defend an Islam that will destroy all they find so valuable?

A recent study (see below) makes the claim that the Bible is as violent as the Koran. Hence there is no need to worry about with Islam. It is just like Christianity and Judaism. My only interest is in political violence, not when Cain killed Able. Political violence is when a group attacks those outside of it. It is political when Muslims kill Kafirs in jihad, for instance. This eliminates counting personal violence and internal wars. We want to measure ideas, so we count more than individual sentences. We need to count all the content that applies to the political violence. There is no political violence in the New Testament, There are 34,000 words about political violence in the Hebrew Bible (Old Testament) and 328,000 in the Koran, Sira (life of Mohammed), and the Hadith (his traditions). In short, there is nearly 10 times as much political violence in Islamic doctrine than there is in the Bible. http://cspipublishing.com/statistical/charts.html#Bible The violence in the Old Testament is historical in nature, not prescriptive. The violence in Islam is prescriptive and applicable to all people and times. Jihad is forever. This data makes sense. It will be jihadists committing murder in the morning news, not Methodists or Mennonites. http://mic.com/articles/134803/here-s-what-happens-when-you-compare-the-violence-in-the-quran-to-that-in-the-bible#.X44gQToAa Sign up for Bill Warner PhD's newsletter at www.politicalislam.com Buy Bill's books at: www.politicalislam.com/shop

Progressives talk a lot about the evil of hate. We are told that if we object to Sharia law and jihad, then we are intolerant haters. But what about hating harms people? I hate wife-beating, yet the Sharia, Koran, and Sunna support it. I am intolerant of child abuse, including child marriage, but the Sunna and Sharia support it. I hate the jihadist killings of Christians, Jews, Buddhists and apostates. I am intolerant of religious leaders, such as the Pope and Dai Lama, who will not condemn the jihadic killing of their groups. I hate dualistic ethics, which lack integrity. I am intolerant of face coverings since it cuts off open communication. As a society, we have lost the ability to become morally outraged and are incapable of anger about the Islamic harm to innocents. I hate that.

The Kafirs lost 50 to 1 in the Orlando nightclub jihad. The reason for choosing to kill homosexuals is found in Islamic doctrine. The Koran condemns homosexuals but offers no penalty for the crime. The Hadith (traditions of Mohammed) calls for a death sentence. But this latest jihad killing is just one of thousands that have happened around the world. Why are we losing? We are losing the war because we keep offering reasons to excuse Islam for the jihad. Jihadists are never lone wolves. Every jihadist has a perfect partner in the jihad in Mohammed and Allah. Don't see, don't tell. Actually, we have a stupid motto of: "If you see something, say something." But if you report a problem about a Muslim, it will be ignored and you can be called a bigot. We accept Sharia as another set of religious laws, like Jewish law. However, the Sharia contains evil in the form of jihad, hatred of Kafirs, killing homosexuals and apostates. All of Sharia is contaminated with evil. We call jihad extremism. But 24% of the Koran of Medina is about jihad. If it is in the Islamic doctrine, then it is not extreme, but normal. We call jihad imams extremist. If an imam talks about the doctrine of jihad, he is not extreme, but speaking about doctrine. We say that Islam needs reform. How do you reform a Koran that is complete, perfect, universal, and eternal? Those who talk about political Islam are called Muslim haters, but we just talk about a political doctrine. We cannot criticize a religion (except Christianity). Well, political Islam is not a religion, it is a political system. Our politicians back tying the hands of law enforcement. The clergy defended Islam and refused to complain about the killing of Christians, Jews, Hindus, and Buddhists. So, how do we win? Our strategy: It's the Islam, stupid! We need to attack a political doctrine by knowing it and using the right language. Every Muslim shall be held accountable for all of the jihad, Kafir hating actions, and words of Mohammed and Allah. We must defeat political Islam by using political attack methods of humor, irony, ridicule, and criticism of a political system. It is the Islam, stupid!

Pope Francis met with a high-level imam in order to spread peace and co-existence. The Pope is willing to ignore 1400 years of jihad against Christians to talk about peace. But peace in Islam only comes after submission. Co-existence in Islam comes when the Kafir becomes a dhimmi and accepts Sharia law. The last Pope to talk about the history of Islamic murder of Christians caused Muslims to riot and kill. This Pope calls terrorism the problem, not jihad. He also uses the phony phrase "true Islam" as if jihad is not true Islam. The shop-worn word "extremist" is used to divorce the doctrine of Islam from the reality of current events and history. The imam spoke the only word of truth: "We should not treat Muslims as a terrorist threat." The threat is not Muslims; the threat is the doctrine of political Islam. The Pope also brought home Muslim migrants, not Christian refugees from Islamic persecution. The Pope, Christians, and everybody else ignore the suffering of Christians. The Pope is no different from the ignorant Protestants and Jews. Ignorance is the problem, ignorance of the political nature of Islam.

When my talk was announced recently, the "virtuous" progressives fired off their usual smear tactics. They did not produce a single fact about me but said that a leftist group claimed that I was one of the chief Muslim bashers. This is very odd since I don't talk about Muslims, just Mohammed and Allah. I am an opponent of political Islam, not Muslims. They charge me with presenting a "slanted" view of Islam, which is true. Three different views of Islam are demonstrated by the reaction to the day that Mohammed beheaded 800 Jews. Muslims see it as a day of victory; apologists see it as just another historic event. My view is that of a Kafir - beheading the Jews because they said that Mohammed was not a prophet - was an evil act. If you speak about Islamic political doctrine the apologists say you are a bigot. A clergyman weighed in to say that I do not appreciate the vibrancy of Muslim culture. He is right. I only care about political Islam. I would hope that he would care about the brutality of Islam about Christians in Africa and the Middle East, but he is silent about that evil. A community college president said that I should be forbidden to speak. This is symptomatic of schools becoming centers of ideology, not fact-based reasoning. Why all of the insults? It is the only weapon of the ignorant.

Sharia law is the most important part of Islamic doctrine. Sharia is Islam; Islam is Sharia. Sharia includes law, but it also includes how to raise a family, theology, philosophy, and every aspect of daily living. Sharia law includes pronouncements for both Muslims and non-Muslims (Kafirs). Sharia is a manual for a civilization. Sharia does not allow free speech. It is forbidden to make a joke about Mohammed. Blasphemy is forbidden. The US is following Sharia when it allows the UN to determine that Muslim refugees come to America and not Christians. We have Sharia-compliant textbooks now in Tennessee. We hesitate to anger Muslims or criticize Islam. In Europe, Islamic rape is accepted behavior. Sharia says that our Constitution is manmade and a product of ignorance. Sharia is Allah's law and must replace all other governments. Countries that adhere to all of Sharia are Saudi Arabia, Afghanistan and Yemen. Most Islamic nations do not apply all of the Sharia, but it is there when more stringent laws are wanted. All Kafirs are involved in the Sharia; it is just a matter of how much. We should recognize it and resist its expansion in our civilization.

The Tears of Jihad is a summary of the deaths caused by jihad against the Kafir for 1400 years. It is the greatest story never told. Presidents Bush and Obama have denied this history. Our history talks about the invasion of Turks, Arabs, Saracens, Berbers, and Moors, but does not call it jihad. Our most recent report of the 9/11 attacks omits jihad. No explanation is ever given of why the native culture is always annihilated after Islam invades and puts Sharia law in place. In the twentieth century, over two million Armenian and Syrian Christians were killed in jihad. Who knows the details? We need a museum devoted to the greatest suffering in history. It would document the annihilation of Christian, Buddhist, Hindu, and polytheist cultures. It would document slavery, rape, and how apologists for Islam deny all of this history. The Museum would show how Islamic doctrine drives history--cause and effect. We would have accredited scholars giving seminars and debates. The Museum would have a physical center as well as a web presence. We need to document the suffering, so it can be stopped. Those who do not study history are doomed to repeat it. Thanks to Danusha Goska: http://www.frontpagemag.com/fpm/262782/proposal-museum-victims-jihad-danusha-v-goska

Brain physiology is such that we feel good when we help others. The Golden Rule, treating others as we would be treated, is hard-wired into our physical makeup. However, Mohammed attacked each and every neighbor. Attacking your neighbors is not an expression of the Golden Rule. But, there is no Golden Rule in Islam. A Kafir is worse than an animal and is hated by Allah. Twelve verses in the Koran say that a Muslim can be friendly to a Kafir, but should never be a true friend. Sympathy allows us to put ourselves in the place of others. This sympathy is outside of Islamic doctrine. In Islamic doctrine those Muslims who are true friends with a Kafir are not truly Islamic. My personal opinion is that this lack of sympathy for Kafirs is the worst part of Islam. The Koran places barriers between Muslims and Kafir, which violates the idea of humanity being of one spirit.

When people go to an event where they might be able to ask a question of a Muslim, what is the best way to ask? I recommend a specific technique. Do not ask about the Koran. Do not ask about Islam, instead ask about Mohammed. State some idea from the Sunna (what Mohammed did or said) and then ask the Muslim a question about obeying that Sunna. Your goal is to educate the audience. Here is an example: The Sunna of Mohammed includes wife beating, as does the Sharia. Do you agree that wife-beating is a good practice? You will never get a straight answer, but the audience learns about Mohammed and Islamic doctrine from your question.

Sharia law is the most important part of Islamic doctrine. Sharia is Islam; Islam is Sharia. Sharia includes law, but it also includes how to raise a family, theology, philosophy, and every aspect of daily living. Sharia law includes pronouncements for both Muslims and non-Muslims (Kafirs). Sharia is a manual for a civilization. Sharia does not allow free speech. It is forbidden to make a joke about Mohammed. Blasphemy is forbidden. The US is following Sharia when it allows the UN to determine that Muslim refugees come to America and not Christians. We have Sharia-compliant textbooks now in Tennessee. We hesitate to anger Muslims or criticize Islam. In Europe, Islamic rape is accepted behavior. Sharia says that our Constitution is manmade and a product of ignorance. Sharia is Allah's law and must replace all other governments. Countries that adhere to all of Sharia are Saudi Arabia, Afghanistan and Yemen.

There is a mass migration from Islamic lands to Kafir lands. It is the mission of Islam to bring the Sharia into power, everywhere. There is an ethical divide between Islam and the hated Kafir civilization. It is the purpose of Sharia to dominate the Kafir civilization. As Muslims immigrate, they immediately make Sharia demands. These demands are endless in detail, but the process can take generations. We can see the centuries-long transformation in the Middle East and Turkey which used to be Christian. This does not mean that every Muslim takes part in the politics of Sharia since only a few Islamic leaders are needed. The reason that Islam can win every attempt to advance Sharia is that Kafirs are tolerant of all demands and do not push back. So if our attitudes do not change, Kafir nations will become Sharia nations.

Many people are afraid of speaking out about Political Islam. But, once you understand the nature of our enemies, you need not be afraid. Actually, we have two enemies: the far enemy (Islam) and the near enemy (the apologists). You only need to deal with the apologists, such as ministers, media editors, school board members, and opinion makers. The only damage you will have to contend with is being called names, such as bigot, hater, and racist. We must educate the apologists by understanding their principles and showing them how Political Islam violates their own beliefs. Once they can see this, they can become an ally.

Whenever there is Islamic violence the media uses the word "terror" not jihad. The problem is that the jihad of murder is only one of many types of jihads and it is the least of jihads. The jihad of murder will kill people, but the jihad of money, speech, and writing brings us closer to Sharia. Sharia annihilates a civilization. Civilizational jihad is found in the content of our new textbooks which praise Islam as the greatest of civilizations. These new textbooks are filled with half-truths, which cannot be challenged. The jihad of textbooks will destroy the thinking of a generation. The jihad of money has invaded our universities which reject critical thought about Islam in exchange for donations from the Saudis. The Islamisation of universities is far worse than murder. Another jihad that is killing us is found in religious dialogues. The idea sounds wonderful, but the ignorant Jews and Christians just smile and nod their heads as they agree that Islam is so wonderful. Debate is absent by consent. And another nail is driven into the coffin of our civilization. The jihad of murder is the very least of our problems.

The liberal media is beginning to admit that Islam has a formal doctrine of jihad. They have been forced into this admission due to the constant propaganda of jihad doctrine by ISIS. Now the media says that the Islamic State, ISIS, has a narrow interpretation of Islam. But, it is just the opposite, ISIS has the broadest interpretation of Islam. Islamic doctrine is slowly revealed, just like the Koran. It has an early form in Mecca and a fully developed later form in Medina. Now these may contradict each other, but both are true. The law of abrogation says that the later doctrine is better or stronger than the earlier doctrine. ISIS uses all of the doctrine, including Medina. The so-called peaceful Muslims do not use all of the doctrine, just the early Meccan form. So peaceful Muslims have a narrow, exclusive interpretation. ISIS and all of the jihadis have the broadest interpretation, which is inclusive.

It is the purpose of the Islamic State, ISIS, to annihilate Kafir civilizations, including their history. ISIS is destroying the antiquities and history of Syria, doing what Islam has done for 1400 years. Islam calls all history that came before Mohammed, jahiliyah, ignorance which is offensive to Allah. It is to be annihilated. When there are riots and collapse of governments in the Islamic Middle East, museums are ransacked, and treasures are stolen and destroyed. It was Islam that tried to destroy the pyramids of Egypt. And Islam that destroyed the Bamiyan Buddhas of Afghanistan. In our new Tennessee textbooks, history is being rewritten to present Islam only as a force for good. Meanwhile, we are seeing the death of humanity's history.

Bill Warner PhD provides an overview of his book The Hadith: The Traditions of Mohammed. The easiest way to learn about Islam is through the traditions, the Hadith, of Mohammed. https://www.politicalislam.com/product/the-hadith/

One of the most common questions is: Is Obama a Muslim? Who knows, but it doesn't make any difference. He always supports Islam, the Muslim Brotherhood, and the Sharia. What is important is the Islamification of the US. Hillary Clinton is not a Muslim but her chief advisor is Huma Abedin. Huma is closely linked with the Muslim Brotherhood. Hillary is an apologist for Sharia and Islam. George Bush is not a Muslim but he advanced Islam with his declaration that Islam is the religion of peace. Bush would not use the word jihad, and gave us the "war on terror." The governor of Tennessee is not a Muslim but he only allows Muslims to train Tennessee law enforcement about "terror." Schools in America are beginning to adopt Sharia-compliant textbooks. Obama will be gone, but what difference does that make? Our politicians are Islamifying the US without him.

Only a day after the November 13 jihad attacks in Paris we see the usual politically correct responses. Ironically Obama and Kerry had pronounced Islamic State "contained" and its "days are numbered" earlier in the day. Merkel of Germany says that the proper response to jihad is tolerance and European values. The politicians do not use the word jihad, but terror and terror networks. The left-of-center press says that the rhetoric of the right causes terror and that poor Muslims will suffer from being associated with terror. They should be worried about being associated with jihad. The professors still teach Islam without jihad. The press will not offend Muslims. Police do not study the doctrine of jihad. Politicians cry out for more Muslim refugees. We are losing a civilizational war because of political correctness. To win we must start using the language of Islam. We must start conversations about the ideology and doctrine of political Islam.

Those who teach themselves about Islam are called ignorant since they taught themselves. A theological school teaches religious Islam, not political Islam. Universities do not teach about the evil of Islamic politics and a history of persecuting Kafirs. But if you choose to learn by your efforts, you are told you cannot possibly understand it, yet an illiterate Muslim can. Islamic doctrine consists of the Koran, Sira, and Hadith. The Sira is a biography and the Hadith is a collection of small stories about Mohammed. Anybody can understand Mohammed's life and hence, understand Islam. The only part of the Koran that matters to a Kafir is the part that deals with them. Any Kafir can understand what the Koran says about him. When people say you cannot educate yourself about Islam, what they are really saying is they are afraid or too lazy to read for themselves. If you cannot teach yourself then no need to try. But today anybody who can read can understand political Islam.

Recently Vanderbilt University hosted an anti-Islamophobia conference called Muslim Neighbors. The conference was a dialogue about inclusiveness. But we should examine what the term "Muslim neighbor" means by looking at Mohammed, the perfect Muslim neighbor. Mohammed had neighbors in Mecca, but he caused so many arguments and fights that he had to leave and go to Medina. Half the population of Medina were Jews, Mohammed's new neighbors. In Medina, he attacked the Jews, enslaved them, murdered them, and exiled them. After three years, there were no more Jews for neighbors. He then attacked his Jewish neighbors in Khaybar, took their wealth, and made the Jews dhimmis ruled by Islam. Mohammed also attacked his pagan neighbors, robbing their caravans, stealing their wealth, and murdering them. Then he moved north out of Arabia to attack the Christians in Syria. Christians in Syria today are being betrayed by Muslim neighbors they thought were friends. But Muslims are never true friends of Kafirs, so says twelve verses from the Koran. So much for Muslim neighbors.

Bill Warner PhD talks about migration is part of the doctrine of jihad. Migration is so important that the Islamic calendar is based upon the Hijra, Mohammed's migration from Mecca to Medina. Why? Because it was migration that led to the creation of jihad in Medina. And it was jihad that made Islam triumphant. In the past Muslims tended to stay in Islamic countries. Today, the new politics is to migrate to Kafir lands and immerse themselves in local politics. This is the jihad of money, writing, and speech. Their politics is to bring the Sharia to Kafir culture. An example is using Islamic money is to build departments in universities that will support Sharia and never criticize Islam.