MadonnaGuy

The now suspended Dr William Bay has been found guilty of improperly disputing the Governments’s position on the Covid-19 vaccines at an emergency meeting of the Australian Medical Board (17 August 2022) and has had his registration immediately suspended by AHPRA. He was determined to be a serious risk to public health and safety and his public statements undermined confidence in the public health messaging in relation to the COVID-19 vaccines. Dr Bay’s position is that he had the important and basic human right to express his views, and it was his responsibility as a doctor to advocate for the health and safety of his patients. Furthermore, he still believes people and doctors should be allowed the legal and moral right to question government directives and public health messages. The Government should not get in the way of the doctor-patient relationship. Doctors must be allowed to exercise their own thoughts on issues affecting their patients - otherwise the public will NOT have confidence that doctors are doing the right thing by them. In essence, it is Dr Bay’s position that it is the Medical Board/AHPRA that has undermined the public’s trust in the profession, not him. If you agree with Dr Bay’s stand, please show your support by attending a QPP rally and/or making a donation for his fight to take this matter to the Supreme Court of Queensland. Dr Bay urges you to stand with him to make it possible again for doctors to speak freely in the interests of you the patient, lest we lose our ethical medical system forever.

Dr. Michael Yeadon on Telegram: Back at G20, there has just been issued a communique that says “in the next pandemic, we’ll be imposing VaxPass in order to travel. No jab, no (international) travel. Be sure, however, it’ll morph into no jab, remain in virtual house arrest or close to it. We’ve seen them do things very close to this & noted that not very many objected. I’ve long warned, with others, that preventing perpetrators from succeeding in their diabolical plan to enslave humanity involves mandatory digital ID and cashless central bank digital currencies. Lying about pandemic pathogens and lying about the necessity to vaccinate with agents that aren’t vaccines is a core part of this plan, without which it cannot succeed. Do be aware and marshall one or two arguments at your fingertips to help persuade others that this is not necessary and is in fact wholly malign. 1. Rushed gene-based “vaccines” will all intrinsically be very dangerous at a population level, regardless of individual experiences. That your neighbour has had five jabs without knowingly experiencing side effects does not mean “these are safe”. My substantive point is that they’re intrinsically harmful & that cannot be circumvented. The main reason is that, even if they did what they said they’d done (which they haven’t & couldn’t for several technical reasons), there is huge, intrinsic variation of individuals resoknse to such “vaccines”. 2.It’s ludicrous to pretend that everyone must be vaccinated. Assuming the narrative is true (it’s not) you’d only offer the jabs to the obviously at risk population. All others don’t need & will not benefit even from a genuinely safe and effective product. Ironically, even the elderly won’t benefit either because their immune systems won’t respond to these novel antigens. 3. Global pandemics of respiratory pathogens that are of high concern / high morbidity and mortality CANNOT happen. They’re lying to you even about the theoretical backdrop. High lethality infections make people ill quickly and that causes people involuntarily to withdraw from human interactions & thus R nought falls. Recall SARS (2003) & MERS (2012) were self limiting and became institutionalized illnesses. They didn’t spread well in the general public. They never have, either. Even the Spanish Flu was nothing like the 50 million dead that they pretend. We’ve lots of evidence that “influenza” didn’t feature in international health regulations updated in the early 1920s, just a handful of years after purportedly the worst global pandemic since the medieval infections, like plague and Black Death. 4. They want you to accept this because it’s a crucial enabler of their totalitarian control. Best wishes, Mike

Dear Youth & Women You are unique with desires and dreams, with sadnesses and regrets, with human emotions and behaviours. Some of these may need refining, modifying or removed so that your lifestyle, your relationships, your business, your friendships and your internal happiness can reach its peak and you can achieve greater successes and peace. TAKE ACTION TODAY for COACHING & COUNSELLING - free initial consultation (valued $220) * Removing stuck trauma, unhealthy emotions and behaviours * Improving health, and wellbeing and healing * Gaining energy, vitality and motivation in your life Finding value, and divine potential in 'you’. www.lotus-energies.com www.spirit-ed.com Leanne James #lotusenergies

An expert panel led by the former chief scientist Ian Chubb has warned ministers that controversial scientist Peter Ridd is misrepresenting robust science about the plight of the Great Barrier Reef, and compared his claims to the strategy used by the tobacco industry to raise doubt about the impact of smoking. The warning, in a letter to the federal environment minister, Sussan Ley, and the Queensland premier, Annastacia Palaszczuk, follows Ridd launching a lecture tour in which he has repeated his claim that farmland pollution does not significantly damage the natural wonder. Ridd’s tour has been supported by rightwing commentators and sugarcane industry managers campaigning against proposed state regulations limiting sediment and chemical runoff on the reef coast.

Dr Bay has bravely spoken out about the Covid Narrative as forced by the Australian government, World Health Organisation, United Nations and AHPRA. He had created a freedom loving protest group, and is encouraging and supporting more doctors and medical professionals to speak out against this criminal regime.

The microbiome is the collection of all microbes, such as bacteria, fungi, viruses, and their genes, that naturally live on our bodies and inside us. Although microbes are so small that they require a microscope to see them, they contribute in big ways to human health and wellness. They protect us against pathogens, help our immune system develop, and enable us to digest food to produce energy. Because the microbiome is a key interface between the body and the environment, these microbes can affect health in many ways and can even affect how we respond to certain environmental substances. Some microbes alter environmental substances in ways that make them more toxic, while others act as a buffer and make environmental substances less harmful. How can the microbiome affect health? The critical role of the microbiome is not surprising when considering that there are as many microbes as there are human cells in the body. The human microbiome is diverse, and each body site – for example, the gut, skin, and oral and nasal cavities – has a different community of microbes. A person’s core microbiome is formed in the first years of life but can change over time in response to different factors including diet, medications, and environmental exposures. Differences in the microbiome may lead to different health effects from environmental exposures and may also help determine individual susceptibility to certain illnesses. Environmental exposures can also disrupt a person’s microbiome in ways that could increase the likelihood of developing conditions such as diabetes, obesity, cardiovascular and neurological diseases, allergies, and inflammatory bowel disease. For example, specific changes in the gut microbiome have been linked to liver health. NIEHS-funded researchers and collaborators developed a rapid, low-cost tool that uses stool samples to detect microbial changes that can accurately diagnose liver fibrosis and cirrhosis.

STOP 5G Tweed Northern Rivers Gold coast NSW Community Hi! Please let us know how we can help. About See all This page is to Stop the 5G small cell roll out of superfluous wireless devices and/or base stations in public space on light poles closer to our homes. Anti-vaccination / Covid-19 and depopulation propaganda will not be tolerated. Thank you. See less I want you to understand the reasons behind our motivations because there are many besides ‘health concern’ ... 1/ The deployment of small cells for 5G is too close to homes. (5 metres) 2/ The number of small cells for 5G means too many homes will be impacted. (every 100 - 300 metres) 3/ 5G does not concern the ability to call for emergency. 4/ The increased internet speeds from base stations compared to Landline NBN or ADSL on mobile devices are simply unwanted. 5/ The evidence of property value decreasing from those seeking healthy living. 6/ The evidence of increased ability of surveillance within the home by second and third parties. 7/ The appearance of additional equipment in public spaces. 8/ The evidence of increased security risks. 9/ The unknown health effects from peer reviewed studies suggest the debate is heavily equated. 10/ Every additional electrical equipment in public spaces add fire risk in dangerous fire prone areas. 11/ The improper notification from telecommunication companies is a violation of their own industry code. It has been proven only those who see the construction are notified and the letters can be unmarked and unsealed. 12/ The expense of wireless data currently means the average uses approx 2GB - 10GB on their mobile device. To consider that should be faster is irrelevant to most users. 13/ Landline internet from ADSL2+ and NBN is of much greater concern considering cheaper costs and abundance. 14/ There are still some rare areas without 4G and this should be rectified. 15/ There are still some homes without ADSL or NBN that is functional and this should be fixed immediately. To consider those with a 4G connection should have faster 5G wireless before those who even have an ADSL is absurd. 16/ The severe environmental wastage in selling or trashing an old phone just to have faster speed is no way considered to us as ‘progress’ 17/ The evidence of addiction in children and teenagers has proven to affect their memory capacity.. These are the facts on the debate of 5G health risks... The main health effect from sensitivity to microwave radiation in smartphones and mobile towers is an unusual never-ending headache. Electromagnetic Hypersensitive sufferers are being tested on today in laboratories run by Professor Rodney croft in Wollongong. The government still believes sensitive people are suffering a nocebo response… Psychosomatic. (invented in the mind) The EHS research is costing 2.5 million!! One of the tests require the patient to be blindfolded and for them to sense a fake Wi-Fi. No tests and health outcomes of the sensitive individuals is public knowledge. No reporting has been done on this. Studies suggest approx. 1-3% of the world population are suffering these rare health effects. Sufferers include young children. So far EHS cannot be proven nor disproven. The WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION has also recognized microwaves as a classification 2B which is a possible carcinogen. Like Aloe Vera which sounds safe but also lead and chloroform which sound possibly risky. 100’s of studies is claimed to exist from reputable sources that microwave radiation is safe. These studies are claimed to be mostly funded by the telecom industry. 70-80% 100’s of studies is claimed to exist from reputable sources that microwave radiation is a health risk. These studies are funded independently from the industry and much harder to construct and afford. 70-80% DR Charlie Teo is a neurosurgeon. This doctor has been warning phone users to use hands free or a wired headset for 10 years. Dr Karl with a history in electrical engineering and physics from triple j.. states there will be no option and admits to no consent and openly says there is nothing to worry about. The Ramazzini Institute in Italy delivered another large-scale study clarifying microwave radiation can cause cancer. Which gave strength to the national toxicology program report in 2018. Both these reports are the largest of their kind and state a clear risk of cancer. After the only ABC feature called ‘Wi-Fried’ (an Australian doco) saw all science journalists of catalyst fired. This was also the reason catalyst was vetted into a much smaller program. Dr. Stan Barnett from CSIRO’s Ultrasonics Laboratory, Division of Radio physics created a report listing many well-documented adverse bio-effects from exposure and was fired as a potential risk in 1994. Important References and Attachments ... Telstra was served a warning from the communications commission of Australia for not adequately notifying the public. https://www.acma.gov.au/articles/2019-05/telstra-fails-consult-community Multiple studies linking cancer... https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/new-studies-link-cell-phone-radiation-with-cancer/ Inquiry into 5G in Australia receives 600 submissions from overwhelming objection within community. https://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Committees/House/Communications/5G Silicon Valley pay high fees to ban iPad in their own children’s education https://www.nytimes.com/2019/04/21/technology/silicon-valley-kansas-schools.html Cancer Cluster in elementary school https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4F0KpcOurHU National toxicology program report https://www.niehs.nih.gov/health/materials/cell_phone_radiofrequency_radiation_studies_508.pdf Neurosurgeon Charlie Teo https://9now.nine.com.au/today/videos/brain-cancer-linked-to-mobile-phone-use/cjvfw0z1u000g0gl6aapp9pri https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yXy_uGWF-v8 https://www.news.com.au/technology/brain-surgeon-dr-charlie-teo-warns-against-mobiles-home-appliances/news-story/a44c78d3671c38971f87687b990b34cf Current Affair news report September ‘2018’ https://www.9news.com.au/national/2018/09/18/17/19/mobile-phone-towers-5g-network-radiation-health-concerns-risks EHS trust Facebook - (please follow this Facebook page) https://www.facebook.com/EHTrust/videos/288588778628581 Australian Telstra radiation technician quits. Hires a tank to demolish multiple towers https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0TiOx7_DVj0&feature=youtu.be Wi-Fried (Australian doco) please note – all science journalist of catalyst were fired over this event https://vimeo.com/155864822 Report from Griffith University https://app.secure.griffith.edu.au/news/2017/08/17/concerns-rise-over-potential-adverse-health-effects-of-5g-technology/ Generation Zapped (most current documentary) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h7R4gKs8ViI Is an invisible weapon targeting U.S. diplomats? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YBdFM8AuHk8 The truth about mobile phone and wireless radiation (Melbourne University) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BwyDCHf5iCY Trump and gates do not want 5G https://youtu.be/iErkp4x5OMQ https://www.palmbeachdailynews.com/news/20170503/official-palm-beach-exempt-from-5g-wireless-law Sperm Count in men has dropped 50-60% when mobile phones first began. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/sperm-count-dropping-in-western-world/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4074720/ https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/health/news/12167957/Mobile-phones-are-cooking-mens-sperm.html Sparrows are a species which indicate environmental health. Sparrows have recently dropped in population by 50-80% world wide. We are one of the only countries not indicating to the public increased electromagnetic radiation is a plausible causation to this. https://www.abc.net.au/news/2019-07-17/where-have-all-the-sparrows-gone/11303030 Videos are popping up around the world showing residents cutting down smart cell poles in order to regain freedom of privacy. https://www.facebook.com/hassaine.said/posts/10220448833759325 More ‘unrest’ from western australia... https://thewest.com.au/news/crime/arsonist-jailed-over-telecom-phone-tower-fires-ng-b88941345z

Setting goals is an effective way to increase motivation and to help you to create the changes you want. It can be used to improve health and relationships, or improve productivity at work. Setting goals can also be an important step in the recovery from mental illness.

Overall deaths in Australia - where nearly everyone is vaccinated - are spiking. It's Monday Down Under. Get ready to start the week with frightening data. Alex Berenson Jun 6 Add Australia to the countries seeing an unusual surge in deaths from all causes following mass mRNA shot campaigns . The Australian government reported on May 25 that deaths in Australia were 21 percent above normal in early 2022. Even excluding Covid deaths, deaths were more than 10 percent above normal. SOURCE Victoria, Australia's second-most-populated state, offers an even grimmer picture. Unlike the national government, Victoria publishes monthly death figures in near-real time. On Thursday, it reported 4,312 deaths in May, 27 percent above the average of May 2020 and 2021 - the equivalent of 45,000 extra deaths in the United States. SOURCE — The Australian death spike is particularly striking, because Australia had no excess deaths - and little Covid - in 2020 and much of 2021. Thus the usual alternative explanations cannot hold. The spike cannot be the result of delayed medical care or “long Covid” (whatever long Covid is). Australia’s weather and geography are also very different than the European countries now reporting excess deaths. Further, the Australian data show that most excess deaths in January and February 2022 were NOT cardiac. Deaths from cancer were slightly above average, but the biggest jumps were in deaths from diabetes and dementia, both almost 30 percent above normal. Reports in scientific journals and in the federal VAERS database have highlighted cases of severe diabetic dysregulation following the mRNA shots. Anecdotal stories of elderly people suffering rapid mental deterioration, especially after a second or booster shot, are also common.

Jazzy Melhop After a lifetime of extreme sports, including BMX racing, dirt bike riding and roller derby, Jazzy Melhop sustained significant injuries that left her barely able to walk and made sleep almost impossible at just 38 years old. Many years of various therapies brought little or no relief until a dear friend in Margaret River WA took her to a Bowtech Bowen Therapist. The relief from that one session was so remarkable that she sought two more sessions in Brisbane. After those three sessions, Jazzy made a life-changing decision and signed up for the first Cert IV class available. Jazzy’s work history includes 15+ years in community welfare across various administration and support roles. This led to incredible insight into human behaviour and the opportunity to meet and network with some of the best medical and psychological support people specifically in Eating Disorders and in the wider health and wellness industry in Brisbane. Learning is an ongoing journey. Jazzy first studied health improvement in 2000 with the study of Human Sciences (Homoeopathy). She continued with her Certificate IV in Bowen Therapy, Diploma of Specialised Bowen Therapy, Specialised Procedures with Ozzie and Elaine Rentsch and Biochemistry in Tissue Salts. “I love learning and I am so excited to have the opportunity to share how this gentle, highly effective modality has inspired me. The opportunity to teach such a life-changing technique that is close to my heart, is an incredible honour. The most amazing thing about learning and knowing the Bowen technique is that no matter where you go, your two hands are with you and I never miss a Bowen opportunity.” An example of this sentiment in action is the volunteer work that Jazzy has been privileged to participate in, including 3 years in a homelessness support centre, working with disadvantaged members of our community. During the 2019/2020 bushfire disaster, Jazzy travelled to NSW, using the Bowen Technique on more than 50 firefighters, pilots, ground staff and the Blazeaid volunteers. “My greatest gratitude goes to Thomas Ambrose Bowen, for allowing us to learn from his phenomenal mind and experiences and to my Bowen Therapy journey mentor Desley Faulks.”

Equine-assisted therapy (also known as EAP or horse therapy) uses horses for mental health treatment. The patient takes part in various horse-related activities, including feeding, brushing, riding, and leading. Besides horse and patient, a horse trainer and a licensed equine therapist are also involved. An equine therapist may have a bachelor’s or master’s degree in animal science or counseling. They may also have professional certifications. While seemingly a modern technique, knowledge of horseback riding’s health benefits go back to antiquity. The Ancient Greek physician Hippocrates noted horseback riding’s therapeutic potential in his writings. This is because horses have a natural ability to pick up on human emotions. Like humans, horses experience emotions and are both intuitive and social with unique personalities. Horses can analyze and react to human body language, providing people with valuable feedback about themselves. They can demonstrate self-awareness, trust, leadership, patience, affection, boundaries, and more. They can also mirror human moods without judgment or expectations. While not always easy to control, by riding horses, people can learn empathy and teamwork. This can carry over to all areas of life. Clients interact with the horses by using non-verbal communication, creative thinking, and problem-solving skills. Doing so helps them address various mental, emotional, social, behavioral, sensory, and physical needs. Conditions that equine-assisted therapy is an effective mental health treatment for: Depression Anxiety Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) Attention deficit disorder (ADD) Addiction Trauma Eating disorders Types of Equine Assisted Therapy (EAP) Here are some of the different types of equine-assisted therapy: Horse Therapy (Therapeutic Riding) With Therapeutic riding, the patient learns riding techniques. This helps them gain various cognitive, emotional, and physical benefits. Learning how to control a horse while riding it teaches confidence, self-esteem, coordination, and balance. The connection between the horse and the patient helps the patient build trust and rapport. Hippotherapy Named after the Greek word for horse, Hippotherapy can be used as a form of speech, physical, or occupational therapy. Unlike therapeutic riding, where horse-specific skills are taught, here, the focus is using the horse’s movement as treatment. The sensory input from a horse’s natural gait has various benefits for patients with neuromotor and sensory dysfunction issues. While a handler leads a horse through different tempos, gaits, and cadences, the rider must adjust their posture and engage different muscles. Equine-assisted therapy has been successfully used as treatment for cerebral palsy.5 Equine-Assisted Learning (EAL) EAL uses horses in an educational context to help people develop life skills. People interact with horses to help them develop personal, professional, and social skills such as non-verbal communication and self-confidence. Equine-Assisted Psychotherapy (EAP) Equine-assisted psychotherapy involves collaboration between a therapist and a horse trainer. Together, they use horses to treat patients with psychological disorders. The mental health therapist will work with the client through several sessions to discuss their feelings and behavior patterns that working with horses can bring to light. Issues that have been treated by this unique form of psychotherapy include: Grief over a passed loved one Stress and PTSD Anger management Substance abuse Relationship problems Other Animal-Assisted Therapies Other animal-assisted therapies include dogs, cats, and all kinds of domesticated animals to help people recover from or better cope with health problems. This includes everything from anxiety and depression to heart disease and cancer.1 Animals provide comfort and joy. A wealth of studies show that animals’ presence can lift people’s spirits and help diminish their discomforts.9

Dr Naomi Wolf May 30 I’ve been silent for some weeks. Forgive me. The truth is: I’ve been rendered almost speechless — or the literary equivalent of that — because recently I’ve had the unenviable task of trying to announce to the world that indeed, a genocide — or what I’ve called, clumsily but urgently, a “baby die-off” — is underway. The WarRoom/DailyClout Pfizer Documents Research Volunteers, a group of 3000 highly credentialled doctors, RNs, biostatisticians, medical fraud investigators, lab clinicians and research scientists, have been turning out report after report, as you may know, to tell the world what is in the 55,000 internal Pfizer documents which the FDA had asked a court to keep under wraps for 75 years. By court order, these documents were forcibly disclosed. And our experts are serving humanity by reading through these documents and explaining them in lay terms. You can find all of the Volunteers’ reports on DailyClout.io. The lies revealed are stunning. The WarRoom/DailyClout Volunteers have confirmed: that Pfizer (and thus the FDA) knew by December 2020 that the MRNA vaccines did not work — that they “waned in efficacy” and presented “vaccine failure.” One side effect of getting vaccinated, as they knew by one month after the mass 2020 rollout, was “COVID.” Pfizer knew in May of 2021 that 35 minors’ hearts had been damaged a week after MRNA injection — but the FDA rolled out the EUA for teens a month later anyway, and parents did not get a press release from the US government about heart harms til August of 2021, after thousands of teens were vaccinated. [https://dailyclout.io/pfizer-vaccine-fda-fails-to-mention-risk-of-heart-damage-in-teens/] Pfizer (and thus the FDA; many of the documents say “FDA: CONFIDENTIAL” at the lower boundary) knew that, contrary to what the highly paid spokesmodels and bought-off physicians were assuring people, the MRNA, spike protein and lipid nanoparticles did not stay in the injection site in the deltoid, but rather went, within 48 hours, into the bloodstream, from there to lodge in the liver, spleen, adrenals, lymph nodes, and, if you are a woman, in the ovaries. [https://dailyclout.io/internal-pfizer-documents-prove-knowledge-that-lipid-nanoparticles-in-mice-subjects-do-not-remain-in-muscle-but-were-shown-to-be-rapidly-distributed-in-the-blood-to-the-liver/] Pfizer (and thus the FDA) knew that the Moderna vaccine had 100 mcg of MRNA, lipid nanoparticles and spike protein, which was more than three times the 30 mcg of the adult Pfizer dose; the company’s internal documents show a higher rate of adverse events with the 100 mcg dose, so they stopped experimenting with that amount internally due to its “reactogenicity” — Pfizer’s words — but no one told all of the millions of Americans who all got the first and second 100 mcg Moderna dose, and the boosters. Pfizer skewed the trial subjects so that almost three quarters were female — a gender that is less prone to cardiac damage. Pfizer lost the records of what became of hundreds of their trial subjects. In the internal trials, there were over 42,000 adverse events and more than 1200 people died. Four of the people who died, died on the day they were injected. Adverse events tallied up in the internal Pfizer documents are completely different from those reported on the CDC website or announced by corrupted physicians and medical organizations and hospitals. These include vast columns of joint pain, muscle pain (myalgia), masses of neurological effects include MS, Guillain Barre and Bell’s Palsy, encephaly, every iteration possible of blood clotting, thrombocytopenia at scale, strokes, hemorrhages, and many kinds of ruptures of membranes throughout the human body. The side effects about which Pfizer and the FDA knew but you did not, include blistering problems, rashes, shingles, and herpetic conditions (indeed, a range of blistering conditions oddly foreshadowing the symptoms of monkeypox). The internal documents show that Pfizer (and thus the FDA) knew that angry red welts or hives were a common reaction to the PEG, a petroleum-derived allergen in the vaccine ingredients — one that you are certainly not supposed to ingest. Indeed, PEG is an allergen so severe that many people can go into anaphylactic shock if they are exposed to it. But people with a PEG allergy were not warned away from the vaccines or even carefully watched by their doctors, EpiPen in hand. They were left to their shock. Pfizer knew that “exposure” to the vaccine was defined — in their own words - as sexual contact (especially at time of conception), skin contact, inhalation or lactation. [https://dailyclout.io/vaccine-shedding-can-this-be-real-after-all/]. ‘Fact-checkers’ can deny this all they want. The documents speak for themselves. Of course, people who have tried to raise any of these issues have been deplatformed, scolded by the President, called insane, and roundly punished. Athletes and college students and teenagers are collapsing on football and soccer fields. Doctors wring their hands and express mystification. But BioNTech’s SEC filing shows a fact about which the CDC and the AMA breathe not a word: fainting so violently that you may hurt yourself is one of the side effects important enough for BioNTech to highlight to the SEC. But not to highlight to you and me.

From: The Spectator Australia! The ‘New Normal’ of medical fascism is coming regardless of how Australians vote at the federal election. Having acquired a taste for globalised control during the Covid pandemic, the World Health Organisation has teamed up with vaccine manufacturers, philanthropic billionaires, and power-crazed world leaders to create a ‘Global Pandemic Treaty’ in Geneva. It is set to form part of the ‘one health’ approach proposed by the WHO and has been pitched by its creators as a way to overcome the inconvenient battle between – as they put it – globalism and statism. According to International Affairs who were reviewing the treaty, the globalist approach ‘shares many overlapping values with that of a transnational cosmopolitan, medical humanitarianism or moral egalitarian world-view, rooted in the Kantian logic of universal community’ while the statist approach is a nationalist one that might ‘undermine’ global efforts. In June of 2021, Scott Morrison commented on the proposed treaty, saying: ‘It’s essential that we strengthen global (disease) surveillance and provide the World Health Organisation with the authority and the capacity to do this important job for all the peoples of the world. If we are to deliver on this ambitious reform agenda, then we must work together and put other issues aside.’ Yes, the same Prime Minister who attempted to escape criticism by saying ‘there’s no such thing as vaccine mandates’ is champing at the bit to grant the WHO absolute control over the health choices of Australian citizens. It amounts to extending similar emergency powers to the WHO that Daniel Andrews gifted himself in Victoria – except Australians can’t vote the WHO out of power. As for Labor, they have laid down at the feet of the WHO, tummies up and paws in the air like dogs waiting for a rub. The advertised pretext for a global health treaty is that countries were wrongly allowed to take bespoke approaches to Covid – in particular, their vaccine roll-outs. According to the WHO, this endangered the health of the whole planet. A more accurate reading of the situation comes from discussions had at the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations launched at the World Economic Forum in 2017, funded by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, Wellcome Trust, and a consortium of nations that include Australia. The Liberal government pledged a further $100 million to CEPI in March, 2022 to add to the $1.5 billion it has raised from other governments. As explained in a previous Spectator Australia article, CEPI’s mission is to create ‘equitable access to vaccines’ because they do not like the volatility (and competition) of the free market. This is the same organisation that poured a fortune into RNA and mRNA vaccines for the WHO’s DiseaseX scenario which – less than a year later – was put into emergency production to combat Covid as a ‘proof of concept’ exercise. Their stated objective from the beginning, long before Covid, has been to find a way to force Western governments to purchase vaccines in bulk for the Third World under the banner of ‘equity’. The handling of the Covid pandemic is being used as an excuse to justify what was already designed and publicised. In this light, the proposed Global Pandemic Treaty is – first and foremost – a trillion-dollar business deal. Being discussed is a $10 billion per year ‘preparedness fund’ along with an additional $100 billion emergency fund – that you pay for. Who knows what else is coming… The World Health Organisation often complains about free will when it comes to national pandemic responses. We now know that nations like Sweden were able to provide real-world data that contradicted much of the ‘approved’ health advice issued by the WHO. We also know that the WHO ‘leaned on’ European nations that tried to go their own way with health directives. If anything, one of the great weaknesses of the Covid pandemic response was the uniform approach enacted by world leaders that copied Communist China in their locking down of nations, unethical medical coercion of citizens, and widespread police brutality. How much worse would the behaviour of state premiers, prime ministers, and presidents have been if their actions were ‘legalised’ by an international treaty with no possible recourse for citizens? There is certainly no confirmation that the WHO took the correct approach, considering some of the countries who deviated from the norm did better than the average of obedient nations. Worse, the nation that caused the pandemic – China – is one of the notable absences from the treaty. What is the point of enacting the treaty if Patient Zero refuses to come to the table? It’s a bit like the United Nations’ Climate Change promises that don’t include the world’s largest polluter. Further difficulty is being created by the reputation of the WHO. Historically, the WHO has hardly been a reliable or independent body worthy of wielding absolute power over the global health decisions. Its leader, Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, was controversially backed by Xi Jinping’s government in a nasty election process. Tedros, in turn, was criticised for shielding China from investigation over the outbreak of Covid that (almost certainly) escaped from a Level 4 Viral Lab in Wuhan. On repeated occasions, advice issued by the WHO was found to be inconsistent or simply wrong, while they issued eye-brow raising changes to long-held dictionary definitions of fundamental concepts like ‘herd immunity’ and ‘vaccines’, let alone the near comical back-flipping on mask advice. It is not the sort of behaviour that instils confidence. This is before addressing the recorded failures and subsequent investigations into WHO practices in the Third World. If anything, what the world desperately needs is independent thought in pandemic responses – a free market of ideas where merit, not compliance, is given the opportunity to advance health. If Scott Morrison or Anthony Albanese sign this treaty, it represents a seismic shift in everything we thought we knew about democracy. It is likely the treaty will make it possible for a foreign bureaucracy with unacceptably close ties to China to call the shots – literally – on global public health. Universal healthcare was meant to be a voluntary safety net – not a stepping stone to international socialism or the dissolution of body autonomy. That said, the wheels are already falling off, with questions being raised about whether it will be a ‘treaty’ in the legal sense after parts of the WHO Constitution were re-worded. The vote for this dangerous Pandemic Treaty will be held in Geneva on May 22-28. Whoever the next Prime Minister of Australia is, they will be there will bells on, ready to sign and absolve themselves of the ‘bother’ of responsibility. It is a dream come true for weak leaders who would love nothing better than to let the blame for the next pandemic and the accompanying citizen outrage rest safely offshore. Yes, the treaty requires the passing of legislation – but Labor, Liberals, and the Nationals have all voiced their approval. The only hope Australians have of stopping it would be a balance of power held by Freedom Friendly minor parties like One Nation – who has stepped out alone to vocally oppose it. Among the horrors facing Australia if the treaty were to proceed are the advertised promises of global tracking (most likely through the World Economic Forum’s Digital Identity policy linked to health passes), mandatory vaccination of all citizens, and the ability for the WHO to declare and sustain a pandemic along with its emergency powers. Lately, international treaties have been used to undemocratically circumnavigate the sovereign will of nations. A treaty is a powerful legal document that leaders use to defy public opinion. While the United Nations cannot force a country to honour its ink-mark (as we saw with China’s shredding of the Sino-British Joint Declaration), Western leaders frequently brandish these treaties as security blankets to justify unpopular policy. ‘The ongoing chaos of this pandemic only underlines why the world needs an ironclad global agreement to set the rule of the game for pandemic preparedness and response,’ said WHO Director General, Dr Tedros. Or – stay with me on this one – the WHO could do its actual job and properly investigate China and its medical partners for dangerous and experimental gain of function research in dodgy labs.

From Substack: Yuval Noah Harari: Technology Will Enslave You—Global Elites Will Save You Technocrats will use AI to control your brain. Not that it matters much. You don't have free will, so you don't have a choice either way. Joe Allen Nov 2, 2021 The Israeli historian Yuval Noah Harari wants you to be terrified of the future. In his 60 Minutes segment last night, the Hebrew University professor scared America half to death with his dire predictions. Human beings are rapidly gaining the ability to alter their bodies and brains through technology, he said, through gene-editing, designer babies, and neuroenhancement devices. But because bionics aren’t cheap, this could be a hereditary fork in the road, where GMO cyborgs become an elite caste that rules over flesh-and-blood holdovers. Simultaneously, tech innovators are on their way to creating artificial intelligence systems that will surpass human reason. Harari told a concerned Anderson Cooper: “Maybe the biggest thing we are facing is really a kind of evolutionary divergence. Consciousness is the ability to feel things, like pain and pleasure and love and hate. Intelligence is the ability to solve problems. But computers, or artificial intelligence, they don’t have consciousness, they just have intelligence.” Because of AI’s superior problem-solving abilities, Harari predicts, this soulless alien intelligence could soon rule over all of us—cyborgs included. In many ways, they already do. Our personal data is being mined relentlessly in order to train these machine learning systems. Our tastes, our habits, even our innermost thoughts are siphoned up through apps and algorithms, creating detailed dossiers and maps of our social networks. As the future bears down on us, genetic sequencing and biometric sensors are extending that surveillance to our biological states. By synthesizing all of this information, corporations and governments will be able to predict our behavior precisely—and direct our souls at will. That is, until the rise of the machines. As the American public listened in horror, Harari repeated the core religious principle behind what he’s long called “Dataism”: “To hack a human being is to get to know that person better than they know themselves—and based on that, to increasingly manipulate you.” healthteam@newleafnaturaltherapies.com.au password healthteam@newleafnaturaltherapies.com.au Subscribe For whatever reason, the historian omitted the darkest element of his futuristic vision. In his 2017 best-seller Homo Deus: A Brief History of Tomorrow, Harari argues that human beings have no free will. We are predetermined biomachines. What we perceive as choice is mere epiphenomena produced by subconscious decision-making processes in our brains. He writes: “The contradiction between free will and contemporary science is the elephant in the laboratory, whom many prefer not to see as they peer into their microscopes and fMRI scanners. … Over the last century, as scientists opened up the Sapiens black box, they discovered there neither soul, nor free will, nor ‘self’—but only genes, hormones, and neurons that obey the same physical and chemical laws governing the rest of reality.” Philosophically and morally, that means we’re not capable of making real choices—we’re just along for the ride. It also means no person is responsible for the nightmarish futures we may create: “The electrochemical brain processes that result in murder are either deterministic or random or a combination of both—but they are never free. … The sacred word ‘freedom’ turns out to be, just like ‘soul,’ a hollow term empty of any discernible meaning.” It’s no wonder, then, that Harari doesn’t take seriously the notion that our decisions, as average citizens, might avert a techno-dystopia. In his view, the development of bionics, neuro-enhancing technology, and artificial superintelligence are simply forces of Nature. It’s as if rare earth minerals are emerging from the bedrock of their own accord and shaping themselves into silicon gods before our eyes. Watching the ever-credulous Anderson Cooper nod along with Harari on 60 Minutes, pretending to have read his books carefully, one wonders why Cooper never confronted Harari about the uncomfortable topic of free will. Instead, they yammered on as if the future is in our hands. Instead of trying to stop these silicon gods from emerging under the direction of predetermined bio-machines (aka, human beings), Harari only offers ways to mitigate the damage. Because artificial intelligence systems gain their power through data extraction—from Silicon Valley to China—that concentration of power must be controlled. On the surface, Harari’s three demands are quite reasonable. Any data collected from a person should be used to help them, not manipulate them. If the general populace is to be data-mined, then corporations and governments should be transparent as well. Finally, all of this power should be decentralized, not concentrated in the hands of the few. But if we are all predetermined biomachines, enslaved to our subconscious brains, who will make these critical decisions? Harari slips his true message in at interview’s conclusion. Having scared the hell out of everyone with a fairly accurate portrayal of our possible future, he tells the wide-eyed Cooper, “Certainly now we are at the point where we need global cooperation. You cannot regulate the explosive power of artificial intelligence on a national level.” End interview. Cut to Pfizer commercial. It would’ve been just as easy for Harari or Cooper to direct the public’s energy toward unplugging from the Machine. But you don’t rise to the top by kicking the ladder out from under your feet. Neither man has any intention of fomenting resistance to technocracy. They have been tasked instead to channel it toward global government. If we mere mortals cannot make decisions for ourselves—if we have no free will—then our behavior must be directed from above. Therefore, we need strong leaders—global leaders—to make our decisions for us. It would be nice to believe these elites will make all the right choices, but according to Harari’s philosophy, they are just as beholden to their subconscious brains as we are. I suppose that means that if global elites wind up creating a techno-dystopia controlled by soulless machines, it really isn’t their fault. Clearly, this propaganda is being disseminated to break the public’s will. If we let this happen, we’ll have no one to blame but ourselves.

I keep getting asked the same question again and again; is this outbreak of monkey pox a real threat, or is this another case of overstated and weaponized public health messaging? I am going to save my answer to this question for the end of this article and instead focus on what monkey pox is, the nature and characteristics of the associated disease, what we know and don’t know. The monkeypox virus, which originates in various regions of Africa, is related to SmallPox (Variola), which are both members of the genus Orthopoxvirus. However, it is important to understand that Variola (major or minor) is the species of virus which is responsible for the worst human disease caused by the Orthopox viruses. For example, Cowpox, Horsepox, and Camelpox are also members of this genus, none of which are a major health threat to humans, and one of which (Cowpox) has even been (historically) used as a Smallpox vaccine. My point is that just because Monkeypox is related to Smallpox, this does not in any way mean that it represents a similar public health threat. Anyone who implies otherwise is basically engaged in or otherwise supporting weaponized public health-related propaganda. In other words, spreading public health fearporn. Monkeypox was first identified in 1958 in colonies of monkeys, and the first human case of the virus was identified in 1970 in the Democratic Republic of the Congo. Most likely this was just the first case identified, as people living in Africa have been in contact with monkeys and the other Monkeypox animal hosts for millennia. The “West African” monkeypox clade (clade = variant) circulating outside of Africa at this time causes a milder disease compared to the closely related virus found found in other regions of Africa (Congo clade). The symptoms of monkeypox are somewhat similar to, but much milder than smallpox disease. The general clinical presentation of the disease caused by the West African monkey pox clade virus involves Influenza-like symptoms — fever, body aches, chills — together with swollen lymph nodes. A rash on the palm of the hand is often observed. In the latter stage of the disease, which may last for up to a month or more in some cases, may involve small lesions which develop a crust, and which can result in a small depigmented scar. There is no evidence of asymptomatic transmission. In other words, current medical knowledge indicates that it is only spread by person to person contact between an uninfected individual and someone who already has symptoms of the disease. Therefore, disease spread can be readily controlled by classical public health interventions such as contact tracing, temporary quarantine of those who have had physical contact with someone who is infected, and longer term quarantine of those who develop symptoms. Essentially all of the current cases in the west which we are seeing in the news are among men who have sex with men, and appear to be due to close physical contact. Monkeypox is endemic in many parts of Africa, and is a “zoonotic” virus, meaning it can be transmitted from a variety of animals (not just monkeys) to humans. Initial animal to human transmission followed by limited human to human transmission is probably the cause of the sporadic cases typically observed in Africa. Chicken pox, which is highly transmissible, is not part of the genus Orthopoxvirus, despite that name “pox.” Once again for emphasis, Cowpox and Camelpox are also in the genus Orthopoxvirus, and they are not particularly pathogenic when contracted by humans; just because Monkeypox is a “pox” virus in the genus Orthopoxvirus, does not mean it is particularly deadly. Monkeypox is a double stranded DNA virus, which means that due to the double stranded nature of DNA each of the two strands act as a “check” on the other during replication. As a consequence of this “error checking”, this and other DNA viruses mutate much more slowly than RNA viruses do. Over time, DNA virus genomes are relatively stable. This means that, unlike SARS-CoV-2 (COVID) or influenza, Monkeypox is unlikely to rapidly evolve to escape either naturally acquired or vaccine induced immunity. For the purposes of making a vaccine, this makes it a much easier target that say, a rapidly evolving RNA Coronavirus such as SARS-CoV-2, the virus which causes COVID-19. Furthermore, from an immunological point of view, the various Orthopox viruses often are cross-protective. In other words, if you have been vaccinated with a smallpox vaccine, or previously infected by Cowpox, Camelpox, or Monkeypox, you are highly likely to be quite resistant to disease caused by the Monkeypox virus which is now being (quite rarely) reported in non-African countries. Current data indicate that Monkeypox is not very infectious in humans - it has a low Ro (perhaps below 1), which is the term used to describe how efficiency an infectious disease can spread from human to human. Again, this is super good news for containment. An Ro of <1 generally means that (even in the absence of social distancing of other containment measures), for every person already infected, on average less than one other person will become infected. For comparison purposes, the Omicron variants of SARS-CoV-2 have an Ro in the range of 7 to 10. A virus with an Ro of less than one can be easily contained with the standard public health methods discussed above. A virus with an Ro of 7-10 essentially cannot be contained and will rapidly spread throughout the world, as we have seen with the Omicron variants. In the case of a virus with an Ro around 1 or less, traditional infectious disease containment methods such as contact tracing, identification and isolation of infected individuals can be all that is needed to control the virus. Now the fact that Monkeypox is being spread from human to human (rather than only arising from contact between a person and an infected animal) is not such good news, but since this transmission appears to be from very close contact, this means that it can be easily contained without resorting to a general population vaccination campaign. In this type of setting, if there is a significant outbreak, vaccination is often restricted to just the health care and/or first responder personnel most likely to be in contact with an infected person. Using a vaccine to help that containment via either “ring” vaccination or wide-spread vaccination strategies is generally unnecessary, and may even be counterproductive, depending on the safety of the vaccine - keeping in mind that no drug or vaccine is perfectly safe. Let me take a moment to tell a personal story to illustrate this point. After the 9-11 events including the anthrax letters, I took a job involving clinical development of a wide range of biodefense vaccines under a US Department of Defense (DoD) contract (issued to Dynport Vaccine Company). One of the vaccine indications we worked on was for prevention of Smallpox. The Vice President of the United States at the time, Mr. Dick Cheney, was advocating for widespread vaccination against smallpox because it was thought that there was something like a 1% chance of a bioterror attack involving reintroduction of smallpox into the United States. The existing live attenuated smallpox vaccine began to be deployed throughout the United States to healthcare workers and first responders. Then multiple reports of vaccine-caused damage began to circulate. I was tasked with looking into historic DoD smallpox vaccine campaign records concerning these types of “adverse events”. Adverse events after administration of this live attenuated vaccine were well known, and generally fell into two categories. In some cases, a small subset of young warfighters and recruits had some previously undetected immunologic defect which resulted in them developing an ongoing infection by the live attenuated vaccine virus that was being used at the time. The other group developed more subtle symptoms including what now appears to have been vaccination-associated myo- and pericarditis - typically ascribed to an autoimmune process. These problems were known risks back when smallpox vaccination was common (and smallpox had not been eradicated) and therefore no surprise when the same vaccine was redeployed in the present. But smallpox had been eradicated, and Mr. Cheney’s worst case scenario never happened. Those who were vaccinated and damaged to protect against a non-existent threat provide a great example illustrating a completely upside down risk benefit ratio. All risk, no benefit. And, appropriately, the smallpox vaccination campaign was halted. Key takeaway: this is not influenza or COVID - this virus mutates slowly, it is not highly infectious, naturally acquired immunity is potent and long lasting, and Orthopox vaccines are usually cross protective. The risk of immunologic escape is very, very low. And the spread of this virus can be readily stopped by simple, inexpensive classical public health measures. If it were otherwise, we would already have experienced a pandemic of Monkeypox decades ago. Monkeypox disease severity can vary with different clades (found in different regions in Africa, which also suggest the virus has been around for a very long time). Luckily, this particular clade is less severe and appears to be endemic in Africa. Unfortunately, it has rarely been studied and so relatively little is known about the virus and associated human disease, largely because the infectious threat to the general population is so low. STAT news’ journalist Helen Branswell has recently interviewed CDC experts, and published an excellent summary of the clinical presentation: “With one to three days of the onset of fever, a distinctive rash appears, often starting on the face. Many conditions can cause rashes but the monkeypox rash has some unusual features, notably the fact that vesicles can form on the palms of the hands. In countries where it is endemic, the virus is believed to mainly spread to people from infected animals when people kill or prepare bushmeat for consumption. Once the virus jumps to people, human-to-human transmission can occur via respiratory droplets — virus-laced saliva that can infect the mucosal membranes of the eyes, nose, and throat — or by contact with monkeypox lesions or bodily fluids, with the virus entering through small cuts in the skin. It can also be transmitted by contact with clothing or linens contaminated with material from monkeypox lesions. (STAT News). There was a prior outbreak of Monkeypox in the United States during 2003. That particular outbreak, the first reported outside of Africa, was traced back to the importation of small mammals from Ghana. As shown by this outbreak, multiple animals can contract the disease - during that outbreak, giant pouched rats and squirrels tested positive for the virus and eventually spread it to prairie dogs being sold as pets in multiple Midwestern states (per the CDC). Forty-seven people caught the disease from the prairie dogs. This is important and relevant history, because the current outbreak appears to be occurring from human to human transmission, with no single individual traced as as case zero. There have been a few other outbreaks outside of Africa over the years from travelers coming from Nigeria. It is currently thought that the Monkeypox virus is much more common in Nigeria than has previously been reported. There is a vaccine that was licensed in the U.S. in 2019 for people 18 years of age and older to protect against smallpox and monkeypox; Bavarian Nordic’s Jynneos. A second vaccine, ACAM2000 made by Emergent Product Development, protects against smallpox and is also thought to offer some protection against monkeypox. Both vaccines are licensed only for people considered at high risk of contracting the disease because they are not entirely safe. In the 2003 Monkeypox outbreak in the U.S., smallpox vaccine was deployed to persons considered at high risk. The U.S. already holds supplies of the vaccines in the Strategic National Stockpile, a hedge against public health emergencies. “To combat a smallpox emergency, the SNS holds enough smallpox vaccine to vaccinate the entire U.S. population. In addition, the SNS has antiviral drugs that can be deployed to treat smallpox infections, if needed,” a spokesperson for the Department of Health and Human Services said via email. In my opinion, the 119 Million dollar smallpox vaccine purchase which was just authorized by the US HHS and Biden administration represents an unnecessary and unwarranted expense, unless there are data showing that the current strain is significantly different from the historic predecessor strains within this clade. The WHO’s Van Kerkhove noted that some of these products have been licensed using what is known as the animal rule, where animal efficacy data are used as a surrogate because the lack of circulating smallpox means the vaccines or drugs can’t be tested for efficacy in people. As a result, any such product could only be used in the context of a clinical trial, she said. “There are options. We just have to make sure that they’re used appropriately. One of the things related to vaccines is we want to make sure if the vaccines are needed and used, they’re used among populations that need them the most. There’s not ample supply of anything right now,” she said. Still, she expressed confidence the outbreak can be controlled. “What we need to do right now is focus on stopping the spread. And we can do that. We can do that with the appropriate messaging, with the appropriate testing … with supportive isolation and clinical care as necessary, with protecting health workers,” Van Kerkhove said. (STAT News). The Bill Gates funded organization GAVI has provided their assessment of the medical threat posed by Monkeypox, which can be found here. Many readers of this substack will not be surprised by my assessment that this GAVI threat assessment is highly biased towards overstatement. For example, the article seeks to create parallels between Monkeypox and Ebola: Similar to viruses like Ebola, transmission only happens in close proximity by contact with lesions, body fluids, respiratory droplets or contaminated materials such as bedding or clothes. The article also states the following pants-on-fire disinformation; Although symptoms often ease within a month, one in ten cases can be fatal. Children are particularly susceptible.

ASEA Science FAQ Redox Signaling Biochemistry Q: What does redox mean? A: The term redox is scientific shorthand for reduction-oxidation reaction, a biologically important electron-transfer reaction that plays a significant support role in many of the body’s life-sustaining processes, notably energy-providing metabolic functions. Q: What is cell signaling? A: The healthy upkeep of the body depends on communication between cells in every tissue, organ, and system. This vital intercellular communication ensures that messages are delivered and received to modulate cell production, initiate and sustain repair mechanisms, and perform other restorative processes. The molecules involved in this communication are called cell signaling molecules. Q: Is cell signaling the same as redox signaling? A: During cellular respiration, the body produces small molecules with redox potential. These are redox molecules, and because many of them can perform cell signaling functions, these types of redox molecules constitute their own important class of cell signaling molecules called redox signaling molecules. Any cell signaling function carried out specifically by redox signaling molecules is known as redox signaling. Q: How are redox signaling molecules produced? A: Redox signaling molecules are produced in every cell of the body through natural metabolic processes. Until the 21st century, such biological processes were the only known source of redox signaling molecules. That changed in the early 2000s, when ASEA developed its groundbreaking, patented process to produce redox signaling molecules from refined salt and purified water—making the first and only supplement on the market verified to contain active redox signaling molecules. Q: If the body produces redox signaling molecules, why would I need a redox supplement? A: While most ordinary dietary supplements provide only nutrients the human body does not synthesize, the biological deficiencies caused by aging and cellular breakdown go deeper than just nutrition. As stress, diet, air quality, and other environmental factors cause cellular breakdown over time, the body’s naturally supplied balance of redox signaling molecules is compromised—creating a need for supplemental redox molecules like those found in ASEA REDOX Cell Signaling Supplement. Q: Is there a connection between redox signaling and gene expression? A: In 2016, ASEA commissioned a scientific study that used gene expression as the key performance indicator for ASEA REDOX Cell Signaling Supplement. The study found that, over eight weeks, those who drank ASEA REDOX daily experienced a 20–31% beneficial and stable change in gene expression in five genes involved in pathway signaling.Q: What is gene expression? A: The nucleus is the cellular “brain,” which holds information about the cell’s specialized function in small segments of DNA called genes. Gene expression is the process by which genetic information is accessed and applied to orchestrate cellular function; without it, cells would be unable to perform life-sustaining tasks. The supplemental redox molecules found in ASEA REDOX Cell Signaling Supplement have been shown to affect genetic expression in a positive way, helping to protect, rejuvenate, and enhance cellular function. Q: What is pathway signaling? A: A series of chain reactions (or cascades) initiated by signals at the cellular level cue cellular responses that maintain the balanced biological activity that keeps your body functioning. Signaling pathways guide the progression of these cellular responses, including genetic responses, determining their scope and overall effect in the body. Some pathways are extensive and can influence a wide range of physiological behaviors. For example, the genes affected by ASEA REDOX play a significant role in influencing five key areas of health: Vascular Health Innate Immune System Response Inflammation Reduction Hormone Modulation Digestive Enzyme Production Redox Signaling Research Q: What kind of research has been done on redox signaling? A: Redox signaling is a maturing area of research within the fields of cell biology and metabolic studies. A peer-reviewed scientific journal dedicated to understanding the vital impact of redox processes on human health and disease was established in 1999. Estimates put the number of peer-reviewed papers on the topic somewhere in the tens of thousands. Q: When was redox signaling discovered? A: The discovery and study of human cells began in the 19th century, but it wasn’t until the latter part of 20th century that cells were understood in enough detail to begin observing and theorizing the forms of signaling behind cell activity. By 1999, the role of redox within cell signaling was understood and formalized enough to prompt the creation of a peer-reviewed scientific journal on the topic. Q: What happened between the discovery of cells and the discovery of cell signaling? A: The processes of metabolism and cellular respiration saw discoveries in the 1930s and ’40s that illuminated the methods by which the human body uses oxygen and redox processes to fuel vital functions. Research in the 1950s and ’60s provided early clues into the molecular basis of cell signaling, though scientific papers didn’t begin talking about cell signaling as a distinct discipline consistently until the ’80s and ’90s. Redox Signaling Technology Q: How did ASEA develop its proprietary redox signaling technology? A: ASEA Founder Verdis Norton was first introduced to redox signaling biochemistry while serving on the board of a Utah biotech company. The company’s preliminary work in redox molecule synthesis had produced promising results, but a lack of funds forced them to shelf the project early. Convinced of its breakthrough potential, Verdis and a few close partners pooled resources to acquire the discontinued tech and revive the research. ASEA commissioned its own team of medical professionals, scientists, and engineers to advance the technology, conducting a comprehensive safety analysis and producing a scalable method of production for ASEA REDOX Cell Signaling Supplement and future redox signaling products. Q: Is the technology behind ASEA’s redox products patented? A: Yes. ASEA has patented the processes used to produce its redox products: ASEA REDOX Cell Signaling Supplement, RENU28 Revitalizing Redox Gel, and RENUAdvanced Intensive Redox Serum. Patent information is available by request. Q: How do I know redox products are safe? A: First, it’s important to remember that redox signaling is a natural biological process that safely occurs in every cell of our bodies. The redox signaling molecules in ASEA products are native to the body and easily assimilated. Studies have consistently shown that ASEA’s redox products are safe and effective. See product label for recommended serving amounts by age. Q: Where are ASEA redox products manufactured? A: All ASEA redox products are manufactured at the ASEA Redox Center, an FDA-registered, NSF-registered facility located within a mile of ASEA global headquarters in Pleasant Grove, Utah. The ASEA Redox Center is owned and operated by ASEA to meet all FDA Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP). These GMP requirements are listed in Section 8 of NSF/ANSI 173, the only accredited American National Standard in the dietary supplement industry developed in accordance with the FDA’s 21 CFR part 111. Q: What does ASEA do for the body? A: ASEA Redox supplement is the first and only product in the world certified to contain active redox signaling molecules, which affect gene expression in a positive way. Drinking four ounces twice a day supplements your body’s own redox signaling molecules, helping to protect and rejuvenate cells, and keep cells functioning at optimal levels. ASEA Redox Supplement has been shown to improve immune system health, help maintain a healthy inflammatory response, help maintain cardiovascular health and support arterial elasticity, improve gut health and digestive enzyme production, and modulate hormone balance to support vitality and wellness. Q: Is ASEA safe to drink? A: Yes! ASEA is 100% safe and nontoxic. Redox signaling molecules are naturally occurring in the body, so ASEA Redox is native to the body. ASEA has spent millions of dollars on research and studies to ensure their products are safe, and they continue to research and improve all their products. Their products meet the highest level of production standards. Q: Is ASEA approved by the FDA? A: ASEA’s production facility is FDA registered and undergoes regular inspections. This means ASEA agrees to follow all guidelines set forth by the Food and Drug Administration for dietary supplements. Furthermore, ASEA’s facility is kosher certified, NSF registered and GMP compliant. Q: Does ASEA really work? A: ASEA invests time and money in testing their products. Their products have been researched by medical doctors who have found that ASEA reduces oxidative stress. ASEA partnered with Taueret Laboratories to study the effect ASEA water had on activating genes. They found up to a 31% difference in gene expression in five genes that have the potential to influence many biological responses. These genes play a role in the immune system, vascular health, digestive enzyme signaling, hormone modulation, and inflammation reduction. Q: Is ASEA chlorine dioxide? A: ASEA Redox Supplement has small amounts of chlorine in it to help create the chemical reaction necessary for it to contain signaling molecules, but the levels are small and completely safe for human consumption. ASEA is made of two ingredients: deionized water and sodium chloride, which are essential for the redox signaling molecules it contains. Q: How long does it take for ASEA to work? A: Tests have proven that cellular biomarkers respond to ASEA within thirty minutes of consumption, so it begins to work right away. Most people start seeing results from ASEA products within five to seven days. ASEA even has a health awareness form to track changes in the body before and during using their products so consumers can focus on the positive changes they do see. Q: Does ASEA help arthritis? A: Some arthritis is caused by inflammation of the joints. ASEA partnered with Taueret Laboratories to study the effects that ASEA Redox Supplement has on the body. One such finding showed a 20-31% increase in gene expression abundance. One area that showed change was inflammation pathway reduction. Some forms of arthritis are caused by inflammation, and some ASEA users who have arthritis have seen good results when using ASEA products. Q: What is redox signaling? A: The human body is made up of cells—imagine it is built of Legos. Each Lego represents a cell, and inside each cell is a mitochondria. Mitochondria send out a signal if there’s something wrong with the cell. If you’re building a bridge with Legos and one Lego is broken, the entire bridge is weakened. The solution is to replace the faulty block. That’s what mitochondria are responsible for: replacing or fixing the faulty cell. They do this by releasing a tiny signal called a redox signaling molecule. When this molecule is released, it signals the body’s genes that something needs to be healed or replaced. Q: Is ASEA a con? A: No. ASEA is exactly what it claims to be: the first and only shelf-stable supplement in the world proven to contain redox signaling molecules. It has been studied by numerous doctors and scientists who have found that ASEA activates genetic pathways for good and reduces oxidative stress. Q: What is ASEA good for? A: ASEA’s breakthrough redox signaling technology provides critical connection and communication between cells to ensure optimal renewal and revitalization, supporting the development of new, healthy cells in the body. Healthy redox signaling is good for a number of things like a strong immune system, hormone modulation and a healthy inflammatory response. In testing, ASEA has also shown to help reduce oxidative stress and support cardiovascular health. Q: Is ASEA just salt water? A: No. ASEA is made of two ingredients: deionized water and sodium chloride, which is basically salt water. But ASEA is more than that. It has been proven by third party laboratory BioAgilytix to contain redox signaling molecules. It is the first and only supplement in the world certified to contain these molecules.

Here's my websites for a few of my favourite products - Cerule StemEnhance, the Zeolite I love (that's fully cleansed) ASEA molecule signalling technology and Solex Bioresonance :-)