MadonnaGuy

Chatting with health advocates Amanda Lawrence & Reenee-Jee Ordono - chatting about the past 2 years, post covid challenges, post jab challenges for the vulnerable - what we can do and improving hope on the planet!!

Story at a glance: The World Health Organization has started drafting a global pandemic treaty on pandemic preparedness that would grant it absolute power over global biosecurity, such as the power to implement digital identities/vaccine passports, mandatory vaccinations, travel restrictions, standardized medical care and more. The WHO is not qualified to make global health decisions. As just one example, the WHO didn’t publicly admit SARS-CoV-2 was airborne until the end of December 2021, yet scientists knew the virus was airborne within weeks of the pandemic being declared. The WHO also ignored early advice about airborne transmission. More importantly, a one-size-fits-all approach to pandemic response simply does not work, because pandemic threats are not identical in all parts of the world. Even people in the same region do not have identical risk and may not need or benefit from identical treatment. The WHO will accept two more days of public comment on the treaty, June 16 and 17, so prepare your statements now. The World Health Assembly will also vote on amendments to the International Health Regulations May 22-28, which may also strip away more individual rights and liberties. The globalists that brought us the wildly exaggerated COVID pandemic in an effort to cement a biosecurity grid into place are now hard at work on the next phase of this New World Order. The World Health Organization has started drafting a global pandemic treaty on pandemic preparedness that would grant it absolute power over global biosecurity, such as the power to implement digital identities/vaccine passports, mandatory vaccinations, travel restrictions, standardized medical care and more. https://odysee.com/$/embed/ep417-globaltreaty/25b67d31f813d34fd0738af390c3159d6cf9514a?r=2NnHxGXeaanUtBW64UkTcC5ykhSDoK8t In “The Corbett Report”, above, independent journalist James Corbett reviews what this treaty is, how it will change the global landscape and strip you of some of your most basic rights and freedoms. Make no mistake, the WHO pandemic treaty is a direct attack on the sovereignty of its member states, as well as a direct attack on your bodily autonomy. A back door to global governance As noted by anti-extremism activist Maajid Nawaz in an April 28 Twitter post, the “WHO pandemic treaty serves as a backdoor to global empire.” COVID-19, while potentially deadly to certain vulnerable groups, simply isn’t a valid justification for handing over more power to the WHO, especially in light of its many inexplicable “mistakes” in this and previous pandemics. As just one example, the WHO didn’t publicly admit SARS-CoV-2 was airborne until the end of December 2021, yet scientists knew the virus was airborne within weeks of the pandemic being declared. The WHO also ignored early advice about airborne transmission. So, it seems clear that the effort to now hand over more power to the WHO is about something other than them being the most qualified to make health decisions that benefit and protect everyone. It seems far more likely that the WHO is being installed as a de facto governing body for the global Deep State. Through the WHO, under the guise of biosecurity, the globalist cabal who seek to own everything and control everyone will then be able to implement their wishes across the whole world in one fell swoop. With this treaty in place, all member nations will be subject to the WHO’s dictates. If the WHO says every person on the planet needs to have a vaccine passport and digital identity to ensure vaccination compliance, then that’s what every country will be forced to implement, even if the people have rejected such plans using local democratic processes. As noted by Corbett, these negotiations are already well underway, and the treaty is expected to be fully implemented in 2024 — that is, unless the people of the world wake up to what’s happening and beat back this monstrosity. WHO likely seeking to monopolize health care worldwide Under the guise of a global pandemic, the WHO, the World Economic Forum and all its installed leaders in government and private business were able to roll out a plan that had already been decades in the making. The pandemic was a perfect cover. In the name of keeping everyone “safe” from infection, the globalists justified unprecedented attacks on democracy, civil liberties and personal freedoms, including the right to choose your own medical treatment. Now, the WHO is gearing up to make its pandemic leadership permanent, extend it into the healthcare systems of every nation and eventually implement a universal or “socialist-like” healthcare system as part of The Great Reset. While this is not currently being discussed, there’s every reason to suspect that this is part of the plan. WHO Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus has previously stated that his “central priority” as director-general of the WHO is to push the world toward universal health coverage. And, considering the WHO changed its definition of “pandemic” to “a worldwide epidemic of a disease,” without the original specificity of severe illness that causes high morbidity, just about anything could be made to fit the pandemic criterion. The whole premise behind this pandemic treaty is that “shared threat requires shared response.” But a given threat is almost never equally shared across regions. Take COVID-19 for example. Not only is the risk of COVID not the same for people in New York City and the outback of Australia, it’s not even the same for all the people in those areas, as COVID is highly dependent on age and underlying health conditions. The WHO insists that the remedy is the same for everyone everywhere, yet the risks vary widely from nation to nation, region to region, person to person. They intend to eliminate individualized medicine and provide blanket rulings for how a given threat is to be addressed. Without a doubt, this can only result in needless suffering, not to mention the loss of individual freedom. How the WHO has wielded previous pandemic instruments To give us an idea of how the WHO might end up misusing this new proposed international “instrument” on pandemic prevention, preparedness and response, we can look at the International Health Regulations (IHR), which the U.S. signed on to in 2005. The IHR is what empowered the WHO to declare a Public Health Emergency of International Concern (PHEIC). This is a special legal category that allows the WHO to initiate certain contracts and procedures, including drug and vaccine contracts. As noted by Corbett, the IHR allows the unelected director-general of the WHO to simply declare a PHEIC and, suddenly, all member states have to dance to his tune. It basically grants the WHO dictatorial powers over health policy. PHEICs have included the phony H1N1 swine flu pandemic in 2009, the inconsequential Zika outbreak in 2016, the overhyped Ebola outbreak in 2019, and, of course, the massively exaggerated COVID pandemic in 2020. All of these PHEICs were poorly handled and the WHO was criticized as inept and corrupt in their wake. So, to summarize, through the IHR, the WHO has already been significantly empowered to dictate global health policy with regard to pandemics, and they used that power to bamboozle the nations of the world into spending billions of dollars on countermeasures, especially drugs and vaccines, that didn’t work very well. In that sense, the WHO is really just another wealth-transfer instrument. The WHO’s Big Pharma collaborators make billions on the taxpayers’ dime, while the people of the world are left to suffer the consequences of fast-tracked vaccines. Its handling of the COVID pandemic in particular has been unprecedentedly bad, as they were behind the withholding of early treatment with safe medicines worldwide. As noted by ivermectin advocate Dr. Tess Lawrie, the WHO has also claimed the mRNA shots as safe as conventional vaccines, which is nowhere near the truth. Most all available data prove they are the most dangerous drugs ever created. Why would anyone expect the WHO to become less corrupt if given even more power and control? IHR amendments may also restrict rights and freedoms Now, the IHR overrode and superseded the U.S. Constitution from the start, but in January, the U.S. also submitted regulatory amendments that will give the WHO even more power to restrict your rights and freedoms. May 22-28, the World Health Assembly will gather and vote on these amendments to the IHR and, if passed, they will be enacted into international law. These submitted amendments are in addition to the WHO pandemic treaty currently under discussion. As reported by Health Policy Watch February 23: “Washington wants to fast track a series of nitty-gritty, but far-reaching changes in the existing International Health Regulations that govern WHO and member state emergency alert and response — for consideration at this year’s World Health Assembly, 22-28 May. “The U.S. proposal for major IHR rule changes, obtained by Health Policy Watch, has been a topic of discussion in a series of closed-door meetings of WHO member states, which are considering ways to reform the existing IHR, as well as advancing a whole new WHO convention or other international instrument on pandemic prevention and response … “The U.S. is expected to lead a parallel track of tightly-paced ‘informal’ member state negotiations to reach consensus on an IHR reform resolution for approval at this year’s 75th WHA [World Health Assembly] …” The “new WHO convention or other international instrument” mentioned here refers to the WHO treaty currently under discussion. An intergovernmental negotiating body (INB) was established as a subdivision of the World Health Assembly in Dec. 2021, for the purpose of drafting and negotiating this new pandemic treaty. And, as mentioned, this INB has begun that work. However, as noted by Corbett, this is only the second time in the WHO’s history that an INB has been established. The first one was the INB of the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control, 22 years ago. So, this is not a well-established process, and it’s hard to predict how it will play out. Bill Gates builds GERM team for the WHO Another clue about what the WHO intends to do with more power comes from its primary funder, Bill Gates. Gates recently announced he’s building a pandemic response team for the WHO, which he would like to be called the “Global Epidemic Response & Mobilization” or GERM Team. This team will be made up of thousands of disease experts under WHO’s purview, and will monitor nations and “decide when they need to suspend civil liberties, force populations to wear masks and close borders,” The Counter Signal reports. Of course, Gates is also the largest funder of the WHO (when you combine the donations from both his foundation and GAVI, the Vaccine Alliance). This and other relationships speak volumes about the corruption still ruling the WHO. At the end of the day, Gates is basically paying the WHO to dictate to the world what they must do to make Gates a ton of money. As noted by The Counter Signal: “Gates’ announcement of the GERM team coincides with the World Health Organization’s drafting of a global pandemic treaty … In the future, the pandemic treaty will not only ensure that member states abide by International Health Regulations but will also put the WHO in the driver’s seat, so to speak. Member states, including the US and Canada, will take their orders directly from the organization. As Conservative MP Leslyn Lewis explains: “‘The treaty includes 190 countries and would be legally binding. The treaty defines and classifies what is considered a pandemic, and this could consist of broad classifications, including an increase in cancers, heart conditions, strokes, etc. If a pandemic is declared, the WHO takes over the global health management of the pandemic. “Of even more concern, if this treaty is enshrined, the WHO would be in full control over what gets called a pandemic. They could dictate how our doctors can respond, which drugs can and can’t be used, or which vaccines are approved. We would end up with a one-size-fits-all approach for the entire world … A one-size-fits-all response to a health crisis doesn’t even work across Canada, let alone the entire globe’ … “It isn’t unreasonable to assume that the GERM team, as a new branch of the WHO, would oversee making sure member states comply with the pandemic treaty after the draft is finalized and member states sign on. “The next question, then, is how the WHO and Bill Gates would be able to monitor every individual in every country to determine whether enough people are sick to justify locking a region down. “To this end, the WHO has contracted German-based Deutsche Telekom subsidiary T-Systems to develop a global vaccine passport system, with plans to link every person on the planet to a QR code digital ID … Thus, there will be one pandemic treaty, one GERM team, one global vaccine passport and one World Health Organization to monitor every person on the planet.” Under WHO control, vaccine passports are a given Indeed, while countries around the world have scrubbed their COVID measures and backed away from vaccine passports, the WHO is still moving ahead with a global vaccine passport program. So, if the WHO is given the authority to dictate biosecurity rules for the world, you can bet they’ll insist on vaccine passports with built-in digital identity and readiness for a centralized programmable central bank digital currency. As reported by the Western Standard: “The WHO fully intends to provide support to its 194 member states to facilitate the implementation of the digital verification technology for countries’ national and regional verification of vaccine status. “‘COVID-19 affects everyone. Countries will therefore only emerge from the pandemic together. Vaccination certificates that are tamper-proof and digitally verifiable build trust. WHO is therefore supporting member states in building national and regional trust networks and verification technology. “The WHO’s gateway service also serves as a bridge between regional systems. It can also be used as part of future vaccination campaigns and home-based records,’ said Garrett Mehl, unit head of the WHO’s Department of Digital Health and Innovation, on Deutsche Telekom’s website.” Can we stop the international pandemic treaty? The question now is, can we stop this “international pandemic instrument” that the WHO is seeking? With short notice, the WHO announced it would accept public comment on the treaty for a total of five days. The World Council for Health was among the few that acted quickly enough to submit a comment in opposition to the treaty. Lawrie delivered the World Council for Health’s submission. In an April 26 update on Substack, Lawrie wrote: “Despite the lack of notice, many grassroots organizations did what they could to spread the word and the World Council for Health’s #stopthetreaty campaign reached an astonishing 415 million people. Many of you made written submissions expressing your concerns. So many of you in fact, that I hear the WHO’s website crashed on the last day.” One person who missed the deadline was professor Robert Clancy, a leading clinical immunologist in Canada. He sent the comment he would have wanted to submit to Lawrie, who included it in her post: “The proposal to take control of pandemics at a central WHO level is untenable and threatens a global society. I am in receipt of the World Council for Health response, and the superbly summarized view by Dr. Tess Lawrie. These concerns reflect the ‘across the board’ view of most Australian doctors … “The failure to understand the restrictions of systemic vaccination for mucosal infection and the dangers of accumulated suppression that follows mindless booster programs, and failure to interrogate the massive databases regarding adverse events of genetic vaccines are but two of the serious mistakes perpetuated by the WHO … “It is foolhardy to even suggest that a ‘one size fits all’ response to a pandemic crisis across geographic zones characterized by hugely different parameters, could possibly be covered by a central bureaucratic process — the need for local decision making is of prime importance. “The rule of science and the rule of the doctor-patient relationship must determine any response to a pandemic, and current experience where the rule of the narrative has so distorted disease outcomes — supported by the WHO — must make very clear the foolishness of rewarding incompetence and corruption with even greater powers. “I write this as the most experienced Clinical Immunologist in Australia, and a leading research scientist in Mucosal Immunology with a focus on ‘host-parasite relationship.’ Professor Robert Clancy AM FRS(N) MB BS BSc(Med) PhD DSc FRACP FRCP(A) FRCP(C)” Make your voice heard in June While many, like Clancy, didn’t get a chance to participate, the WHO has announced it will allow for two more days of public comment, June 16 and 17. As noted by Lawrie: “Please also be aware of the proposed amendments to the International Health Regulations, to be voted on this May at the World Health Assembly. “Like the pandemic treaty, this is another move to seize greater powers and override the sovereign laws of individual nations. Some say this is more significant than the pandemic treaty: if voted in, it means the loss of our sovereignty from this November. James Roguskihas written extensively about this on his Substack. “There seems to be a concerted effort by the WHO and its controllers to attack our sovereignty from all angles. It is important we make it clear that we do not recognize the WHO as an authority over us and that we will not tolerate this abuse of power. “We are sovereign and will not be bound by the undertakings of corrupt officials who pretend to act on our behalf when signing away the inherent rights of the World’s People. They do not act for us and we will not be bound.” I encourage you to make plans to have your voice heard June 16 and 17. Unfortunately, the WHO has not yet released any submission details. Your best bet right now is to sign up for the World Council for Health newsletter. The last time, they issued links and instructions on how to submit your comment, and are sure to do the same for the June submission window. To block the IHR amendments at the May 2022 World Health Assembly, we need to flood our respective delegations with opposition. A list of U.S. delegates can be found in Roguski’s Substack article, “Speaking Truth to Power.” For contact information for other nations’ delegates, I would suggest contacting the regional office and asking for a list (see “Regions” in the blue section at the bottom of the World Health Assemblywebpage). It’s also possible that the World Council for Health will publish guidance on it, so be sure to sign up for their newsletter. Originally published by Mercola.

Dane Wigington GeoengineeringWatch.org Are covert climate engineering operations connected to the exponentially increasing wildfires all over the world? June, 2019, was the hottest month ever recorded on our planet. July, 2019, is expected to break the all time heat record that was just set the month before. Scientists are frantically sounding the alarm about accelerating and immense Arctic heat and crashing polar ice. Unprecedented northern latitude wildfires are currently consuming millions of acres of forest, yet US mainstream media is almost silent about the unfolding cataclysm. As the environment and climate systems collapse around us all, how extreme can the desperation of the climate engineers become? How far are the geoengineers willing to go in their attempt to mask the unfolding climate collapse from the masses? Are the climate engineers willing to incinerate huge swaths of Earth’s remaining forests in order to temporarily cool parts of the planet with continent covering expanses of smoke? Regardless of the overall long term cost to the planet as a whole? Examine the dire data presented in this video report and decide for yourself. We, all of us, are rapidly running out of time. If the biosphere is not soon freed from the ongoing global climate engineering assault, there will very soon be nothing left to salvage of our once thriving planet. Photo credit: Oregon Air National Guard If we are to have any chance of altering our current course in time to make a difference, the effort will take all of us. Detailed activist instructions and geoengineering awareness raising materials can be found on the home page of GeoengineeringWatch.org. Reaching a critical mass of awareness is the only way forward in the battle to expose and halt climate engineering, please, help us to sound the alarm. DW May be freely reprinted, so long as the text is unaltered, all hyperlinks are left intact, and credit for the article is prominently given to GeoengineeringWatch.org and the article’s author with a hyperlink back to the original story. Read More Debating The Geoengineering Reality, Dane Wigington and Cal Tech Scientist Douglas MacMartin March 27, 2018 186 Comments Share Share 3.7K Tweet +1 Share Pin 3 3.7KSHARES Dane Wigington GeoengineeringWatch.org In regard to critically important issues that have extreme ramifications, live on air debates of verifiable facts are absolutely essential. Global climate engineering programs pose an immense and immediate threat to the Earth’s life support systems (and thus the entire web of life). A live on-air public debate has now taken place on WBAI radio in New York (hosted by Geoff Brady) in order to specifically address the ongoing global geoengineering reality. Cal Tech / Cornell / MIT scientist Douglas MacMartin says climate engineering is not occurring. Dane Wigington, lead researcher for GeoengineeringWatch.org (the world's largest and most visited geoengineering website) states available data makes overwhelmingly clear that global geoengineering programs have been deployed for decades with catastrophic results. Who is telling the truth and backing it up with verifiable facts? View this fast moving 1 hour video and decide for yourself. Reading and reviewing the document excerpts shown in this video is essential, momentarily stopping the video in order to do so is recommended . We must publicly expose academicians who are helping to cover the tracks of the climate engineers. Once the public is fully awakened to the geoengineering atrocities, those that are accomplices to the cover-up should be held legally and morally accountable in a court of law. All of us are needed in the critical battle to expose and halt climate engineering, sharing credible data is key. DW May be freely reprinted, so long as the text is unaltered, all hyperlinks are left intact, and credit for the article is prominently given to GeoengineeringWatch.org and the article’s author with a hyperlink back to the original story. Read More New Science Study Comes Closer To Disclosing The Catastrophic Health And Environmental Consequences Of Climate Engineering January 25, 2016 190 Comments Share Share 2.8K Tweet +1 Share Pin 20 2.9KSHARES Dane Wigington geoengineeringwatch.org The walls of the power structure are beginning to buckle, those that have served the power brokers are beginning to respond to their own instinct of self survival. The University of Michigan Department of Environmental Health Sciences has just published a Science study, "Assessing The Direct Occupational And Public Health Impacts Of Solar Radiation Management With Stratospheric Aerosols" (excerpts from this study later in this article). Climate engineering is weather warfare, nothing less. The highly toxic materials being used in the ongoing atmospheric aerosol spraying programs all settle down through the air column, this makes geoengineering a form of biological warfare as well. Unimaginable and irreparable decimation is being inflicted on the biosphere and the entire web of life by the ongoing climate modification SRM programs. How long can the insanity in our skies continue without the consequences to the Earth and the human race becoming total? Geoengineering programs are wreaking havoc on the planet from every direction, including being the primary driver of the ever increasing record droughts and forest fires.

Healing Evolution Wellness Centre Counsellor, ACA-L1 Verified by Psychology Today (07) 5625 9854 About Unsure about what the future holds or how to move forward? Trish helps people reconnet to their person power to live a full rewarding life. She combines counselling strategies, mindfulness and aromatherapy to build resilience to live life with more intention and freedom. I empower women in their journey to explore their self worth to live an authentic life on their terms.

Energy Healing with Claire Galea: Change your life with energy healing & Soul Guidance from The Etheric Soul. Choose between KAP, PAX, Pellowah or Reiki to clear your blocks, receive high frequency energy and become your ulimited self. Group and 1:1 healing available. The aim of The Etheric Soul help speed up your spiritual journey so you may experience the peace, balance and joy we’re all seeking. The name ‘The Etheric Soul’ comes from the Etheric Body which is the bridge between your physical body and your higher bodies. Thus, The Etheric Soul aims to support you in strengthening your connection between your Earth Self and your Higher Self. This I do by helping you build solid energy foundations; by clearing out blocks, past life traumas and negative emotions trapped in the body; and by offering Source transmissions to help raise your consciousness, your frequency and connect with your true Soul nature. I’m a PAX Practitioner, (it means Peace), a KAP Facilitator (Kundalini Activation Process), a Reiki Master/Teacher, a Pellowah Practitioner/Teacher, and a Munay Ki Rites Teacher. I offer 1:1 Soul Guidance Counselling, mentoring and I’m also a PAX and Reiki teacher. This journey changed my life (I used to be a financial journalist) and I know it can change yours too. I look forward to connecting with you soon! 0403 446 644 claire@theethericsoul.com.au https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCuK_BFBLRGTHLPBy2snlIOQ

Many people fully vaccinated for covid are now going BLIND lance goodall Apr 30 Thursday, April 28, 2022 by: Ethan Huff (Natural News) We have heard all about the many cases of myocarditis and pericarditis post-injection, as well as recipients repeatedly testing “positive” for the virus even after doing the deed. But now there is another concerning side effect occurring in the “fully vaccinated” for the Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) that is rarely mentioned: blindness. The latest data out of the United Kingdom suggests that a growing number of fully jabbed people are losing their eyesight. The Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) Yellow Card system currently shows 163 cases of total blindness among people who got jabbed with the Pfizer-BioNTechneedle, along with an additional six cases of central vision loss and four cases of sudden visual loss. Twenty-one people also reportedly now suffer from “blindness transient” specifically caused by the Pfizer injection. This adverse reaction involves visual disturbance or loss of sight in one eye for a few seconds or even minutes at a time. Another 20 people beyond that are reported to have suffered from a reaction called “unilateral blindness,” which is when a person got blind or blurred vision in just one eye (Related: Roman Abramovich recently suffered temporary blindness while attempting to broker peace talks between Russia and Ukraine; was he recently vaccinated?) “In total, there have been 8,016 eye disorders reported as adverse reactions to the Pfizer jab as of 6th April 2022,” reported the Daily Exposé. Is it worth possibly going blind just to feel “protected” against a cold? The AstraZeneca injection, which is one of the COVID jabs currently available in the U.K., is also linked to cases of blindness. As of April 6, the MHRA has received 324 reports of blindness, three reports of central vision loss, five reports of sudden visual loss, and 29 reports of blindness transient among 14,895 eye disorders, all specifically linked to the AstraZeneca needle. Moderna also jabs people in the UK, though at a much smaller rate than the aforementioned companies. Still, many people who take the Moderna needle are now blind as well. The MHRA shows that in conjunction with the Moderna injection, there have been 34 reports of blindness and 56 reports of visual impairment. In total, there have been 1,519 eye disorders reported as adverse reactions to the Moderna jab. “In all, when including adverse reactions reported where the brand of vaccine was not specified, there have been 24,516 eye disorders reported as adverse reactions to the Covid-19 injections, with 525 of these reactions being complete blindness,” the Exposé reported. “‘Fact-checkers’ alongside authorities have been on the case to sweep this data under the carpet and have labelled it as unreliable. Their reasoning is that ‘just because someone reports the event after having the vaccine, it doesn’t necessarily mean it is due to the vaccine.'” One person who goes by the name of Louis documented on Twitter the story of his wife, who in the weeks and months following her AstraZeneca jab went completely blind in her left eye and between 30-60 percent blind in her right eye. The neurologist who treated the woman warned her not to get the second dose of the shot. “As you can see the misery which the fact checkers are disregarding as ‘not necessarily the fault of the vaccine’ is very real for the people who are reporting them,” the Exposé added. “But why are the COVID vaccines causing people to go blind?” The answer could have to do with the fact that COVID vaccines also cause major cardiovascular problems, including stroke. Visual loss often accompanies stroke, so it is all starting to make sense. The latest news about the COVID-19 “vaccine” damage can be found at ChemicalViolence.com. Sources include: DailyExpose.uk NaturalNews.com https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCuK_BFBLRGTHLPBy2snlIOQ

Fav supplements post jab, post covid, long-covid, post jab damage - detox and regenerate! Naturopathy is a whole medical system combining theory (philosophy and principles) and practice that uses an array of natural therapies to support healing and maintain health. Naturopaths aim to treat the underlying causes of illness and disease. The core principle of "healing through nature" guides the naturopath’s use of nutrition, dietary counselling, herbal medicine, manual therapies, flower essences, lifestyle education and homeopathy.

As the first wave of the pandemic died down in 2020, the narrative was already being pushed that vaccines were the only way out. However, even before it was clear that the vaccines would predominantly be mRNA based, many were rightly hesitant to receive a novel vaccine that had been produced at warp speed. With The Science™ so convinced that their solution was the only solution, something had to be done to increase uptake. Even though there were many opposing opinions (that were ignored), it was thought that without high rates of vaccine uptake, the pandemic would likely be prolonged. Something had to be done about vaccine hesitancy, so along came Yale University with a study which began in July 2020. The study, which was not published online until October 2021 (once everyone was vaccinated) was to test “how persuasive messaging affects COVID-19 vaccine uptake intentions”. Recent studies had shown that explaining vaccine herd immunity increased willingness to receive a vaccine and reduced the time people would wait to get vaccinated. However, other work found that prosocial appeals did not increase vaccination intentions and prosocial concerns were absent in densely populated areas. They were unsure whether saying “get vaccinated to protect others” would increase willingness to vaccinate. The authors of the study suggested that something else would be needed to get people to encourage others close to them to get vaccinated and to hold negative judgments of those who don’t get vaccinated. “Viewing vaccination through the lens of a collective action problem suggests that in addition to increasing individuals’ intentions to receive a vaccine, effective public health messages would also increase people’s willingness to encourage those close to them to vaccinate and to hold negative judgments of those who do not vaccinate. By encouraging those close to them to vaccinate, people are both promoting compliance with social norms and increasing their own level of protection against the disease. Also, by judging those who do not vaccinate more negatively, they apply social pressure to others to promote cooperative behavior. This would be consistent with theories of cooperation, like indirect reciprocity or partner choice, that rely on free riders being punished or ostracized for their past actions to encourage prosocial outcomes. Thus, effective messaging could have outsized effects on promoting vaccination if it both causes people to vaccinate themselves and to encourage those around them to do so.” They divided the study in to two experiments. The first experiment tested “a large number of treatment messages. One subgroup of messages draws on the ideas that mass vaccination is a collective action problem and highlighting the prosocial benefit of vaccination or the reputational costs that one might incur if one chooses not to vaccinate. Another subgroup of messages built on contemporary concerns about the pandemic, like issues of restricting personal freedom or economic security”. The messages that were tested in the first experiment were: Baseline (To end the COVID-19 outbreak, it is important for people to get vaccinated against COVID-19 whenever a vaccine becomes available. Getting the COVID-19 vaccine means you are much less likely to get COVID-19 or spread it to others. Vaccines are safe and widely used to prevent diseases and vaccines are estimated to save millions of lives every year.) Self-Interest (Stopping COVID-19 is important because it reduces the risk that you could get sick and die. COVID-19 kills people of all ages, and even for those who are young and healthy, there is a risk of death or long-term disability. Remember, getting vaccinated against COVID-19 is the single best way to protect yourself from getting sick.) Community Interest (Stopping COVID-19 is important because it reduces the risk that members of your family and community could get sick and die. COVID-19 kills people of all ages, and even for those who are young and healthy, there is a risk of death or long-term disability. Remember, every person who gets vaccinated reduces the risk that people you care about get sick. While you can’t do it alone, we can all protect every-one by working together and getting vaccinated.) Community Interest + Guilt ((3) (Imagine how guilty you will feel if you choose not to get vaccinated and spread COVID-19 to someone you care about.) Community Interest + Embarrassment ((3) + Imagine how embarrassed and ashamed you will be if you choose not to get vaccinated and spread COVID-19 to someone you care about.) Community Interest + Anger ((3) + Imagine how angry you will be if you choose not to get vaccinated and spread COVID-19 to someone you care about.) Not Bravery (Soldiers, fire-fighters, EMTs, and doctors are putting their lives on the line to serve others during the COVID-19 outbreak. That's bravery. But people who refuse to get vaccinated against COVID-19 when there is a vaccine available because they don't think they will get sick or aren't worried about it aren't brave, they are reckless. By not getting vaccinated, you risk the health of your family, friends, and community. There is nothing attractive and independent-minded about ignoring public health guidance to get the COVID-19 vaccine. Not getting the vaccine when it becomes available means you risk the health of others. To show strength get the vaccine so you don't get sick and take resources from other people who need them more, or risk spreading the disease to those who are at risk, some of whom can’t get a vaccine. Getting a vaccine may be inconvenient, but it works.) Trust in Science (Getting vaccinated against COVID-19 is the most effective means of protecting your community. The only way we can beat COVID-19 is by following scientific approaches, such as vaccination. Prominent scientists believe that once available, vaccines will be the most effective tool to stop the spread of COVID-19. The people who reject getting vaccinated are typically ignorant or confused about the science. Not getting vaccinated will show people that you are probably the sort of person who doesn’t understand how infection spreads and who ignores or are confused about science.) Personal Freedom (COVID-19 is limiting many people’s ability to live their lives as they see fit. People have had to cancel weddings, not attend funerals, and halt other activities that are important in their daily lives. On top of this, government policies to prevent the spread of COVID-19 limit our freedom of association and movement. Remember, each person who gets vaccinated reduces the chance that we lose our freedoms or government lockdowns return. While you can’t do it alone, we can all keep our freedom by getting vaccinated.) Economic Freedom (COVID-19 is limiting many people’s ability to continue to work and provide for their families. People have lost their jobs, had their hours cut, and lost out on job opportunities because companies aren’t hiring. On top of this, government policies to prevent the spread of COVID-19 have stopped businesses from opening up. Remember, each person who gets vaccinated reduces the chance that we lose our freedoms or government lockdowns return. While you can’t do it alone, we can all keep our ability to work and earn a living by getting vaccinated.) Community Economic Benefit (Stopping COVID-19 is important because it is wreaking havoc on our economy. Thousands of people have lost their jobs and are unable to pay their bills. Many others have been laid off by their employers and do not know when they will be called to return to work. Remember, every person who gets vaccinated reduces the risk that someone else gets sick. While you can’t do it alone, we can all end this outbreak and strengthen the national economy by working together and getting vaccinated.) This was a large trial. Over 4,000 participants were randomly assigned to one of the treatment messages or a placebo group which looked at the effectiveness of bird feeders. The first baseline message described how important it was to receive a vaccine so as to reduce your own risk and reduce transmission. It also emphasised that it was safe, effective and saved millions of lives. The subgroup of messages focussed on “what other people might think of someone who chooses to be a free rider by not vaccinating”. The fourth, fifth, and sixth messages added an invocation of an emotion, Guilt, Embarrassment, or Anger, to the Community Interest message. These messages prompted people to think about how they would feel if they chose not to get vaccinated and spread COVID-19 to someone else in the future. Emotions are thought to play a role in cooperation, either by motivating an individual to take an action because of a feeling that they experience or restraining them from taking an action because of the emotional response it would provoke in others. Further, anticipated emotional states have been shown to promote various health behaviors, like vaccination. The seventh and eighth messages evoked concerns about one’s reputation and social image, which influences their attractiveness as a cooperative partner to others. The seventh, a Not Bravery message, reframed the idea that being unafraid of the virus is not a brave action, but instead selfish, and that the way to demonstrate bravery is by getting vaccinated because it shows strength and concern for others (“To show strength get the vaccine so you don’t get sick and take resources from other people who need them more”). The eighth message was a Trust in Science message that highlights that scientists believe a vaccine will be an effective way of limiting the spread of COVID-19. This message suggests that those who do not get vaccinated do not understand science and signal this ignorance to others (“Not getting vaccinated will show people that you are probably the sort of person who doesn’t understand how infection spreads and who ignores or are confused about science.”). The final three messages drew on concerns about restrictions on freedom and economic activity that were widespread during the COVID-19 pandemic. A pair of messages focused on how vaccination would allow for a restoration of Personal Freedom (“Government policies to prevent the spread of COVID-19 limit our freedom of association and movement”) or Economic Freedom (“Government policies to prevent the spread of COVID-19 have stopped businesses from opening up”). These messages take a value that is commonly invoked in individuals’ decision to not vaccinate and reframed vaccination as something that would actually restore freedoms that had been taken away. The final message, Community Economic Benefit, argues that a vaccine will help return people’s financial security and strengthen the economy This message is similar to the Community Interest messages that are described above, but instead focuses on cooperating to restore the economy (“We can all end this outbreak and strengthen the national economy by working together and getting vaccinated”). The authors found that the baseline message only produced a modest increase in intention to vaccinate. However, Community Interest plus Guilt, Embarrassment, Anger, Not bravery, Trust in Science and Personal Freedom messages all produced largest effects with Not Bravery, Community Interest and Embarrassment messages being the most promising. It was predicted that using those messages would increase vaccine uptake by 10.4 - 15.9 percent. When they looked at the effects of the messages for advising a friend to receive a vaccine and the effect for negatively judging someone who refuses to receive one, the Not Bravery, Trust in Science, Personal Freedom, Community Interest, Guilt and Embarrassment messages all had large effects on the outcomes. The embarrassment message increased uptake by 27 percent. The Not Bravery message increased uptake by 21 percent when looking at the negative judgment of non-vaccinators. They even broke it down further and examined what would work best on those who endorsed liberty, men versus women, age, risk takers, Democrats versus Republicans etc etc. Next, they took the best performing messages and tested them on a nationally representative sample in September 2020. This time, Community Interest + Embarrassment messages worked the best for vaccine uptake. When it came to giving advice to others and negative judgements of non-vaccinators, Not Bravery, Trust in Science and both Community Interest message produced the desired effects. The most effective message when advising others was the Community Interest + Embarrassment message and the Not Bravery and Trust in Science were best for judging non-vaccinators. With the Trust the Science message the authors noted that it “had large effects on beliefs and actions toward others but appeared ineffective in changing an individual’s own intended vaccination behavior”. The authors conclude that “Not only does emphasizing that vaccination is a prosocial action increase uptake, but it also increases people’s willingness to pressure others to do so, both by direct persuasion and negative judgment of non-vaccinators. The latter social pressure effects may be enhanced by highlighting how embarrassing it would be to infect someone else after failing to vaccinate. Our findings are consistent with the idea that vaccination is often treated as a social contract in which people are expected to vaccinate and those who do not are sanctioned. In addition to messages emphasizing the prosocial element of vaccination, we observed that messages that invoked reputational concerns were successful at altering judgment of those who would free ride on the contributions of others. This work could also help explain why social norm effects appear to overwhelm the incentive to free ride when vaccination rates are higher. That is, messages that increased intentions to vaccinate also increased the moralization of non-vaccinators suggesting that they are fundamentally linked to one another. It remains important to convince the mass public of the safety and efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines to ensure that the threshold for herd immunity is reached. Our experiments provide robust evidence that appealing to protecting others has effects on intentions to get vaccinated and to apply social pressure to others to do so as well.” The wording throughout this study is almost identical to that used over the last few years. “Safe and effective” “Getting vaccinated is the single best way to protect yourself” “Reduces the risk that members of your family could get sick and die” “How guilty would you feel?” “How embarrassed and ashamed would you feel?” “How angry would you be?” “People who don’t get vaccinated aren’t brave but reckless” “There is nothing attractive and independent minded about ignoring public health guidance” “You risk the health of others” “Trust the Science” “People who reject vaccination are ignorant or confused about the science” “Not getting vaccinated means you are probably the sort of person who doesn’t understand science” “It reduces the chance of lockdowns” How many times did you hear someone parrot one or more of the lines above almost word for word? You may have naively believed that the fear, pressure and psychological toll of the pandemic caused your friends, family or colleagues to act in an unrecognisable way but it was all carefully planned. They conducted a study (and I’m sure this wasn’t the only one) to see which pressure points would work best on different parts of the population and then carefully released mountains of propaganda (funded by you) to turn your friends and family against you. This nudging was all done to get you to take a vaccine you decided you didn’t want. The ethics statement in the study says the experiments conducted were fielded under an exemption granted by the University. It’s not difficult to understand why. Whether mass vaccination was the only way out of the pandemic or not, behaviourally nudging citizens to guilt each other into taking a novel treatment was not the way a civilised society should have acted. They wanted you to get angry in order to get vaccinated but they failed. But they wanted you to get angry, so get angry. Get angry that the population was psychologically manipulated to turn on one another. Get angry that your friends and family were nudged into parroting the phrases used in the study to make you feel guilty, stupid or embarrassed. Get angry that you were socially ostracised and de-invited from events. Get angry that your colleagues made you lose your job. And if you were one of those who tried to convince someone to get vaccinated, get angry that you were so easily manipulated. Share The Naked Emperor’s Newsletter is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.

Dr Christine Houghton holds a PhD in Nutrigenomics and a BSc in Biochemistry from the University of Queensland as well as a Graduate Diploma in Human Nutrition from Deakin University in Victoria. She is a registered Nutritionist and Adjunct Lecturer in the School of Human Movement and Nutrition Science at the University of Queensland. Following 3 decades as a private practice Nutritionist, Christine founded the Brisbane company, Cell-Logic which researches and manufactures nutrigenomic ingredients for clinical application. The company’s primary focus is on the research and development of sulforaphane, a broccoli sprout-derived bioactive phytochemical that targets the upstream causes of disease. The company also uses this ingredient to develop evidence-based nutrigenomically-active encapsulated formulations for clinician prescribing. Christine has authored a number of peer-reviewed scientific papers together with “Switched On – Harnessing the Power of Nutrigenomics to Optimise Your Health”, a book she wrote as a way to introduce the complexities of nutrigenomics to patients whose clinicians have prescribed these formulations. She is an engaging speaker whose evidence-supported presentations may challenge accepted but often-outdated paradigms. Christine’s forte lies in taking complex biochemical concepts and translating their essence so that they are relevant to practising clinicians and their patients. Christine is a regular presenter at nutrition, scientific and medical conferences around the world. Harnessing the Intricacies of the Digestive System G.E.M.M. has been developed by an experienced clinician in Nutritional Medicine, Dr Christine Houghton after extensive research into the complexities of digestive health and the intricate connections that link the gut to every other system of the body. An Innovative Approach to Health G.E.M.M. adopts an innovative approach in its goal to mimic the way Mother Nature restores our health. This is quite different from popular approaches which aggressively target unwanted bacteria and other undesirable gut microbes. By contrast, G.E.M.M. is both gentle and very effective, supporting the inbuilt defence and repair processes within our cells. By understanding Nature’s own inbuilt cellular defence processes, G.E.M.M-accredited clinicians can directly target gut-immune abnormalities. It is these abnormalities that directly lead to the inflammation so typical of gut and immune disorders. The Power of our ‘Friendly’ Bacteria What has emerged relatively recently in our understanding is that the ‘friendly’ – or commensal bacteria – and other microbes living in a healthy digestive tract are absolutely essential for the human immune system to function normally. Knowing this has completely changed the way clinicians must focus on treating both digestive and immune-related disorders. These immune disorders include susceptibility to infection, allergy, autoimmunity, food intolerances and generalised inflammation in the gut and throughout the body. The essential elements of the sciences of Cell Biology, Immunology, Microbiology and Nutrigenomics have been incorporated into an approach that harnesses the inbuilt processes of our cells. As we say, “The science is complex; the implementation is simple.” Our Focus As a science-based organisation, Cell-Logic is focused on producing innovative evidence-based nutraceutical and functional food formulations with potent nutrigenomic activity, comprehensively supported by high-quality professional education. Given that human cells are critically reliant for their function on the food we eat, the air we breathe and the water we drink, it is logical to conclude that human health is highly dependent on the chemical substances to which we are exposed on a day-to-day basis. Fundamental to good health is an appropriate diet, superimposed on other lifestyle factors. When Nutritional Medicine meets 21st Century Science As the sciences of both Nutrition and Cell Biology have evolved over recent decades, it has become apparent that certain intervention strategies of the past are being rapidly superseded. With a clearer understanding of just how human cells achieve and maintain homeostasis, we now know that some of the most popular dietary supplements block the essential signals that human cells depend on for their normal function. Enter the Science of Nutrigenomics Much of this newer therapeutic approach is directly due to clinical application of the relatively new science of Nutrigenomics, a field in which Cell-Logic is acknowledged as a global leader. Formulations based on Nutrigenomic Science Cell-Logic has broadened the application of Nutrigenomics by translating the complexities of the science into clinically-relevant concepts, formulations and therapeutic strategies, tailored to the needs of the practising clinician. In so doing, our approach is to target the core upstream cellular processes as a means of addressing the primary causes of disease, allowing Nature to take care of the intricacies associated with the downstream pathways. Cell-Logic’s Gut Ecology & Metabolic Modulation (G.E.M.M.) Protocol is an example of this approach, our translational research providing clinicians with a comprehensive system to address the core upstream biochemical aberrations which underpin disease.

There feel like there aren't solutions for the chronic health issues that are plaguing society these days... Linda and Madonna have over 50 years clinical and practical experience between them. There's always health solutions out there - you just have to find it. Naturopathy is a whole medical system combining theory (philosophy and principles) and practice that uses an array of natural therapies to support healing and maintain health. Naturopaths aim to treat the underlying causes of illness and disease. The core principle of "healing through nature" guides the naturopath’s use of nutrition, dietary counselling, herbal medicine, manual therapies, flower essences, lifestyle education and homeopathy. Product Education: Adult Stem Cells WHAT ARE ADULT STEM CELLS? Undifferentiated cells that multiply by cell division to replenish dying cells and regenerate damaged tissues. (A cell that has yet to develop into a particular cell type) They can become any type of cell (skin, bone, liver, heart, lung for example) and replicate themselves throughout the entire life of an organism. WHAT DO THEY DO? Repair & rebuild the body. WHAT ARE THE BENEFITS OF HAVING MORE ADULT STEM CELLS? Research shows that a higher number of circulating adult stem cells is one of the most beneficial factors for optimal health. An increase in the number of adult stem cells gives us more building blocks to repair, recover, and rebuild. Adult stem cell natural release rates from the bone marrow decline as we age. By 35 years old, the natural stem cell release rate drops by as much as 45% By 50 years old, the natural stem cell release rate drops by as much as 50% By 65 years old, the natural stem cell release rate drops by as much as 90% All of the cells in our body have a limited life span. Some cells live for days, others live for weeks, months, and some for years. Vitamins, minerals, antioxidants, and good food feed, nourish, and protect our cells. However, no matter how much you feed and protect your cells, they will eventually die off, and it’s only your adult stem cells that will replace these dying cells with brand new healthy cells.

My name is Robert and I've been practicing in the field of energy healing and facilitating explorative journeys through the vast realms of consciousness for the past 5 years. Over this time I have had the honour to meet and train with the leaders and pioneers of consciousness explorations and Soul embodiment. The methods I have learnt and use in my home clinic are: Acupuncture Quantum Consciousness Hypnoenergetics 5D Past Life Regression Universal Consciousness Ultimate Consciousness Shadow Work

Naturopathy is a whole medical system combining theory (philosophy and principles) and practice that uses an array of natural therapies to support healing and maintain health. Naturopaths aim to treat the underlying causes of illness and disease. The core principle of "healing through nature" guides the naturopath’s use of nutrition, dietary counselling, herbal medicine, manual therapies, flower essences, lifestyle education and homeopathy.

Listen to this! AHPRA constitution taken over by World Health Organisation... Are Aussie health rights gone? I'd heard the United Nations and WHO were looking at a date of 24/8/2022 to be fully implemented by 2024. This is next level takeover!

Amanda Thompson has been straddling the natural and medical world for 18 years.. A naturopath for 15 years, joined the biomedical training in Australia as she could see the writing on the wall- the government working systematically to make it harder for people to choose natural remedies and treatments. Government has made it incredibly difficult, especially in the past 2.5 years, to access safe and effective drugs, medicines and natural therapies. Our government as denied free speech in relation to these so-called vaccine mandates and continue to claim “We would never mandate a vaccine” while allowing premiers to stop the ‘unvaccinated’ from going into cafes, restaurants, beaches and parks (Victoria), sporting events… and so much more. Now it looks as though only the vaccinated will be allowed to scrutineer for the elections. Awful time for freedom and natural lives in Australia.

Jacque and Madonna have both been using the LEAP Programme for many years. Research is constantly evolving in this area, and Jacque shares knowledge on the brain, how we can change the brain function using simple effective kinesiology tools. Learning Enhancement Acupuncture Programme (LEAP) is a kinesiology technique which aims to re-programme the brain. An individual's brain contains numerous areas which are dysfunctional with learning problems. The objective of LEAP is to systematically work through areas of the brain and reduce dysfunction one by one. LEAP is a non-invasive, individually applied program combining Western and Eastern ideas and techniques. LEAP works to re-synchronise an individual's brain neurology to give an individual full access to their potential abilities. Janine applies LEAP to correct a variety of dysfunctions the individual is experiencing. Beyond that, LEAP can be used to enhance and fine-tune already healthy and functional individuals by understanding how the brain engages in learning and the factors that prevent or interfere with this process. LEAP works well with individuals affected by learning and behavioural difficulties, as well as offering a program for anyone wanting to achieve their full potential.

Farmer Gregie has been educating people about the land, cows, farming for over 15 years. With a social media following of over 30,000 people, he’s been challenged and frustrated learning the lies behind the manipulation and coercion of people on the planet over the past 2.5 years…. And beyond. If anything it’s made Gregie even more interested in learning the truth, weeding out the lies, sharing information and discovering how the elites on this planet have so much control over us. The more we know, the more we can work to change things.

What Is Sulforaphane? Sulforaphane is a sulfur-rich compound found in cruciferous vegetables like broccoli, bok choy, and cabbage. It has been shown to provide powerful health benefits. In these foods, it’s in the inactive form glucoraphanin that belongs to the glucosinolate family of plant compounds. Sulforaphane is activated when glucoraphanin comes into contact with myrosinase, a family of enzymes that play a role in the defense response of plants. Myrosinase enzymes are only released and activated when a plant is damaged. Therefore, cruciferous vegetables must be cut, chopped, or chewed to release myrosinase and activate sulforaphane (1Trusted Source). Raw vegetables have the highest levels of sulforaphane. One study found that raw broccoli had ten times more sulforaphane than cooked broccoli (2Trusted Source). Steaming vegetables for one to three minutes may be the best way to optimize sulforaphane levels when cooking (3Trusted Source). It’s best to cook the vegetables below 284˚F (140˚C), as exceeding this temperature results in a loss of glucosinolates like glucoraphanin (4Trusted Source). For this reason, it’s best to avoid boiling or microwaving cruciferous vegetables. Instead, eat them raw or lightly steamed to maximize their sulforaphane content. SUMMARY Sulforaphane is a naturally occurring compound in cruciferous vegetables like broccoli, cabbage, and kale. It’s activated only when vegetables are chopped or chewed. The highest levels of sulforaphane are found in raw vegetables. Product Education: Adult Stem Cells WHAT ARE ADULT STEM CELLS? Undifferentiated cells that multiply by cell division to replenish dying cells and regenerate damaged tissues. (A cell that has yet to develop into a particular cell type) They can become any type of cell (skin, bone, liver, heart, lung for example) and replicate themselves throughout the entire life of an organism. WHAT DO THEY DO? Repair & rebuild the body. WHAT ARE THE BENEFITS OF HAVING MORE ADULT STEM CELLS? Research shows that a higher number of circulating adult stem cells is one of the most beneficial factors for optimal health. An increase in the number of adult stem cells gives us more building blocks to repair, recover, and rebuild. Adult stem cell natural release rates from the bone marrow decline as we age. By 35 years old, the natural stem cell release rate drops by as much as 45% By 50 years old, the natural stem cell release rate drops by as much as 50% By 65 years old, the natural stem cell release rate drops by as much as 90% All of the cells in our body have a limited life span. Some cells live for days, others live for weeks, months, and some for years. Vitamins, minerals, antioxidants, and good food feed, nourish, and protect our cells. However, no matter how much you feed and protect your cells, they will eventually die off, and it’s only your adult stem cells that will replace these dying cells with brand new healthy cells.

We chat about the connections with our politicians, WEF, UN, WHO, Jab damage in our clinics, the life of a practitioner opening people's eyes. IMOP-Policies-3_74.png The Informed Medical Options Party (IMOP) aims to bring about change to the government of Australia. We stand for full informed consent, truth and transparency. We advocate for freedom of choice; and we aim to always represent the will of the people. Our main agenda is to eliminate mandatory health policies, and to provide the Australian people with choice when it comes to their way of living. IMOP - We are your VOICE for CHOICE! Individual VACCINATION Remove all the No Jab No Pay/Play legislation, so parents are no longer penalised for their choices. Following this, we will seek financial compensation for all Australians affected by these policies. Remove all COVID and flu mandates to allow those who have lost their jobs from these mandates to receive support as a priority of job placement in their field. Remove all COVID restrictions to allow businesses and tourism to flourish again. Amend all state and federal laws to include vaccine conscientious objection exemptions for the purpose of enrolment in childcare and early education services. Amend all relevant Centrelink legislation to include conscientious objection to vaccination. Establish independent, randomised, quality laboratory testing on all vaccines used in Australia. Improve the Australian vaccine adverse event reporting system. Current inadequate programs, like AusVaxSafety, report on only a few vaccines, and only for short periods of time. Remove monitoring by the TGA, as they have conflicts of interest. Adverse event reports should all be independently investigated. A new independent body is needed to monitor adverse event reports and the safety of vaccines in the population. Insist NCIRS provide research on the health of children as a result of vaccination, particularly long-term. NCIRS are actually required to evaluate the vaccine program. We believe this has not been done for at least the last 2 decades. Evaluating the health outcomes of the National Immunisation Program is an essential part of the risk assessment process. Conduct a study comparing the health of vaccinated versus unvaccinated children in Australia, which was promised by Professor Peter McIntyre several years ago, but never followed up. Make legal aid available for litigation against pharmaceutical companies for vaccine damage. Ensure full informed consent is provided by all doctors, before performing vaccination, for both risks and benefits. Enforce by way of fines, legal requirements to mandate full informed consent by Dr’s, nurses and medical staff. Currently, the benefits are emphasised. We also want to ensure that if vaccine risks are mentioned by a doctor, that their career is not in jeopardy. Increase the options available on government Vaccination Medical Exemption Forms. Establish a Royal Commission into the claims that Australian families have had their children damaged or killed as a result of vaccinations. Request large, long-term, double-blind, random controlled trials on ALL pre-licensed vaccines used in Australia. PARENTAL Support increased parental leave to 12 months for a parent to stay at home with their child. This has the benefit of increased care and bonding, and can help avoid exposure to disease in childcare centres. Advocate for government funded natural and midwife assisted births Protect the right of every parent to choose NOT to vaccinate their child. This needs to be recognised in Australian law as a valid medical option. There should be no threat of interference from child protection services. Amend the Family Law Act to recognise medical decisions made for a child PRIOR to parental separation. Stop forced vaccination of children in temporary care. This is currently occurring without the consent of parents. Bring back the right of parents to make this decision. IMOP wants to limit the authority of state governments so that they can no longer remove children from the care of their parents on the basis of the parents' refusal to consent to medical treatments that are evidenced in the scientific literature to carry serious risks. Presently, removal is authorised if parents refuse consent to chemotherapy, radiotherapy or in some unusual circumstances, even vaccination. HEALTH Defend the right for Australian's to choose traditional and natural therapies, and Include them in the public health system. Legalise medicinal cannabis in all states. Promote organic food & farming. Promote GMO-free food and labelling. Develop complementary options for psychiatric healthcare, rather than psychiatric drugs alone. This particularly needs to be offered when people are placed in psychiatric facilities for extended care and assessment. Remove any ties between Australia and World Health Organisation. FLUORIDE Remove fluoride from all Australian water supplies. ABORTION The QLD Termination of Pregnancy Act 2018 allows for full term abortion. We oppose this Act and will seek to remove it as a priority as soon as we are elected into parliament. We will seek to ban the use of human fetal organs for scientific experiments, medical testing and its inclusion in all products. We support the ‘Children Born Alive Bill’, which offers medical assistance to children who are born alive after an attempted abortion. Environmental PLANET POLLUTION Conduct an independent environmental impact review of all government-approved pesticides, insecticides and herbicides. Phase out all chemicals that affect our environment, including glyphosate, round-up and neonicotinoids. Invest in ethical energy and living. Reduce pollution. Scrutinise impacts of mining and fracking on the environment. Scrutinise government-approved practices that negatively impact on the health of our environment and people. This includes residual contamination and, runoff into creeks, rivers and oceans that threaten to destroy marine ecosystems, including the Great Barrier Reef. Investigate safe, economical and environmentally-sound energy production in Australia. 5G Halt 5G rollout until independent studies and safety levels are assessed on human and animal health, and the environment. Community INDIGENOUS Support indigenous cultures in their use of traditional foods and medicines within the medical system and on country. History demonstrates that loss of culture also causes the loss of spiritual health which results in physical illness. Once elected, an IMOP MP would assist in the delivery of culturally & linguistically diverse projects and initiatives to support and nurture communities to grow and flourish. We will work on any issues brought to our attention through advice and discussion with the Cultural Elders and community - on site if need be. IMOP would engage visitors and residents to nurture equality and tolerance through the following initiatives: Subscribe to newsletter to keep abreast of events and issues; Walk and talk activities in nature; Trouble shooting forums; Support education programs; Conferences; Food experience Festivals; Working bees; Cooking and language programs and books; Community festivals; Plays and art exhibitions and dance around culture; On invitation be a guest speaker at meetings; Education programs; Attend on-site problem-solving issues. EDUCATION Support community schools and more support for alternative and home-schooling. ANIMALS End all cruel animal practices and scrutinise pharmaceutical use in animal industries and the subsequent effects on people and the environment Legal HUMAN RIGHTS Bring back freedom of choice and speech regarding vaccination. We want to end censorship on this topic. Demand government truth and transparency, and disclose ALL conflicts of interest in all areas. As Australia is the only liberal democracy without a constitutional bill of rights, or comprehensive federal human rights legislation, most rights that Australians take for granted are not adequately protected against legislative excess. The parliament is still permitted to enact laws that violate human rights. We seek either a constitutional bill of rights, or a federal human rights Act which is binding on both the parliamentary and executive arms of government to protect our human rights and freedoms. BUSINESS Support small business. Develop policies for less regulation, red tape and laws. Protect community banks and cash, and the right for all Australians to make an anonymous transaction. Limit foreign ownership of business, land and water. Investigate the negative legislative impact of Australia's membership of the United Nations.

About Angela: Let me tell you a little about myself and how I can help you to unlock your full potential and live life on your terms. I am a certified Business and Performance Coach, NLP and TimeLine Therapy Practitioner. I coach and mentor Natural Health Care Practitioners and Business Professionals, from high end executives to small business owners and employees, who want to do more, achieve more, be more, but are lacking the business and marketing clarity, direction, know-how and accountability, or are going through stress, overwhelm and burnout. Working with me will help you to to get on track and increase your performance for career and life success so you can unlock your full potential and live life on your terms. How did I get here? After studying Business and a 10 year Corporate career, including two Corporate Traineeships, I decided to switch paths and became a qualified Naturopath and Acupuncturist…but the passion for business and marketing didn’t go away. I founded and operated my own successful Natural Health Care Practice for another 10 years, (it must be a 10 year itch!) when I then joined Australasia’s leading Natural Medicine company as a senior Presenter, creating and delivering evidence-based Natural Medicine and Business and Marketing seminars, events, webinars, and podcasts internationally. This gave me an exciting platform to continually educate myself and impact more people. Today, after nearly three decades as a recognised leader and influencer in the Natural Medicine industry, I have decided to step up to the next level and coach and mentor Business Professionals going through overwhelm and burnout - FROM BURNOUT TO BRILLIANCE, Natural Health Care Practitioners who want to Grow and Scale their Business, without the burnout - THE PRACTITIONERS’ COACH, and those who want to confidently learn to craft and deliver engaging presentations to establish themselves as the expert - BE THE EXPERT. I am driven by helping people to reach their full potential.