MEN56

Back into a subject I can barely remember, but an attempt at summarizing and concluding before plowing deeper into the Twitter Files story to explore a micro-example of how history is written today. In parts 5 and 6 I summarize the Grayzone and Twitter Filer takes on this core Russiagate matter and the characters involved, and then get into how that story is "edited" by the Jew Jacob Siegel in the Jewish rag Tablet to eliminate the Jewish angle, and utilizing Jewish sources. In this I show the nature of the editorial position of Tablet which explains this defining of history, including a peek at the ethnic ancestral hatred of mother Russia which underlies all of this. After finishing up on "the hoax of the century" I'll move on to show some Taibbi-Grayzone interaction on this story, and cast some actual truth on campaign financing and who owns the government. Finally, I'll wrap this up related to views on RFK Jr.'s presidential run pre-announcement and an interesting and very different but ultimately failed attempt at explaining our world today.

Back into a subject I can barely remember, but an attempt at summarizing and concluding before plowing deeper into the Twitter Files story to explore a micro-example of how history is written today. In parts 3 and 4 I start to address the making and unmaking of the Russiagate operatives story through three phases - in these parts Max Blumenthal and Grayzone from its beginning at the end of 2016 to the defeat of Trump in 2020, focusing on a number of articles citing "hobbyists" and two of the most revealing characters in this tale, the Jewnatic Andrew Weisburd and the JAP Renee DiResta. Next up will be using the linkage of Taibbi (and Shellenberger) and the Twitter Files up to its recent crash and burn to get to Jacob Siegel's also-recent attempt at addressing it all in Tablet magazine, which I critiqued in detail last week on my substack. I'll also eventually cast some actual truth on campaign financing and who owns the government. Finally, I'll wrap this up related to views on RFK Jr.'s presidential run announcement and an interesting and very different but ultimately failed attempt at explaining our world today.

Back into a subject I can barely remember, but an attempt at summarizing and concluding before plowing deeper into the Twitter Files story to explore a micro-example of how history is written today. In parts 3 and 4 I start to address the making and unmaking of the Russiagate operatives story through three phases - in these parts Max Blumenthal and Grayzone from its beginning at the end of 2016 to the defeat of Trump in 2020, focusing on a number of articles citing "hobbyists" and two of the most revealing characters in this tale, the Jewnatic Andrew Weisburd and the Jewish-American Princess Renee DiResta. Next up will be using the linkage of Taibbi (and Shellenberger) and the Twitter Files up to its recent crash and burn to get to Jacob Siegel's also-recent attempt at addressing it all in Tablet magazine, which I critiqued in detail last week on my substack. I'll also eventually cast some actual truth on campaign financing and who owns the government. Finally, I'll wrap this up related to views on RFK Jr.'s presidential run announcement and an interesting and very different but ultimately failed attempt at explaining our world today.

Back into a subject I can barely remember, but an attempt at summarizing and concluding before plowing deeper into the Twitter Files story to explore a micro-example of how history is written today. In parts 1 and 2 I address the fictional nature of worldview in the 21st century, both mainstream establishment and the extreme of alternative on the far right, the establishment of alternative memes prior to 1990 which have been pulled from the shelf by 9/11 Truthers and more recently by the quasi-alternative left still in its infancy, and then looking at Jimmy Dore, James Corbett and Matt Taibbi in these various regards. In the remaining parts I will cover the making and unmaking of the Russiagate operatives story through three phases - Max Blumenthal and Grayzone from its beginning at the end of 2016 to the defeat of Trump in 2020, Taibbi and Shellenberger in the Twitter Files up to its crash and burn, and Jacob Siegel's recent attempt at addressing it all in Tablet magazine, which I critiqued in detail last week on my substack. I'll also cast some actual truth on campaign financing and who owns the government. Finally, I'll wrap this up related to views on RFK Jr.'s presidential run announcement and an interesting and very different but ultimately failed attempt at explaining our world today.

Back into a subject I can barely remember, but an attempt at summarizing and concluding before plowing deeper into the Twitter Files story to explore a micro-example of how history is written today. In parts 1 and 2 I address the fictional nature of worldview in the 21st century, both mainstream establishment and the extreme of alternative on the far right, the establishment of alternative memes prior to 1990 which have been pulled from the shelf by 9/11 Truthers and more recently by the quasi-alternative left still in its infancy, and then looking at Jimmy Dore, James Corbett and Matt Taibbi in these various regards. In the remaining parts I will cover the making and unmaking of the Russiagate operatives story through three phases - Max Blumenthal and Grayzone from its beginning at the end of 2016 to the defeat of Trump in 2020, Taibbi and Shellenberger in the Twitter Files up to its crash and burn, and Jacob Siegel's recent attempt at addressing it all in Tablet magazine, which I critiqued in detail last week on my substack. I'll also cast some actual truth on campaign financing and who owns the government. Finally, I'll wrap this up related to views on RFK Jr.'s presidential run announcement and an interesting and very different but ultimately failed attempt at explaining our world today.

Truth today is an evolved term that doesn't necessarily have that much connection to what is actually true. In part 13 of this series I end up almost entirely focusing on Eisenhower's exit speech and the Military-Industrial Complex concept as a broadly-embraced paradigm with only a limited connection to what he was likely addressing, and in part 14 I get back to where I started, Jimmy Dore, and a number of clips that I think show aspects and consequences of the difference between Truth and the truth. Part 15 will be the last part, come hell or high water, although I do want to cover some of the Hasan-Taibbi "debate" on the Twitter Files before getting to the conclusions.

Truth today is an evolved term that doesn't necessarily have that much connection to what is actually true. In part 13 of this series I end up almost entirely focusing on Eisenhower's exit speech and the Military-Industrial Complex concept as a broadly-embraced paradigm with only a limited connection to what he was likely addressing, and in part 14 I get back to where I started, Jimmy Dore, and a number of clips that I think show aspects and consequences of the difference between Truth and the truth. Part 15 will be the last part, come hell or high water, although I do want to cover some of the Hasan-Taibbi "debate" on the Twitter Files before getting to the conclusions.

Truth today is an evolved term that doesn't necessarily have that much connection to what is actually true. In part 12 of this series I do finish my sidetrip into the latest on the Twitter Files related to Michael Shellenberger and his recent visit to the Rogan podcast, with their discussion on the Judaized opportunist Rep. Stacey Plaskett and a mention of fellow IDF alumnus Jewish culture warrior Sam Harris, and also the Rising's shining happy people's take on that matter. Next up wll be a return to finish up on James Corbett's 9/11 interview, and then to Jimmy Dore before at last the conclusion of this series on alternative/independent Truthers and the nature of their Truth.

Truth today is an evolved term that doesn't necessarily have that much connection to what is actually true. In part 11 of this series I finish (?) my sidetrip into the latest on the Twitter Files, related to Michael Shellenberger and his recent visit to the Rogan podcast. The subject here is once again Renee DiResta and her continuing central role in systematic new media censorship and suppression of opposition. But it's also about the Rising (get it? 😂) tide of a dominant paradigm, that of "It's the government, stupid", which has been so heavily road-tested in the past, and specifically the JFK-sourced demons of the CIA/intelligence and the MIC. So once again we get to see in real time the absolute avoidance of the JQ and instead clutching onto anything that floats in this storm - the truth or Truth?

Truth today is an evolved term that doesn't necessarily have that much connection to what is actually true. In parts 9 and 10 of this series I take a sidetrip into the latest on the Twitter Files, related to Michael Shellenberger and his recent visit to the Rogan podcast. The subject here is once again Renee DiResta and her continuing central role in systematic new media censorship and suppression of opposition. But it's also about the rising tide of a dominant paradigm, that of "It's the government, stupid", which has been so heavily road-tested in the past, and specifically the JFK-sourced demons of the CIA/intelligence and the MIC. So once again we get to see in real time the absolute avoidance of the JQ and instead clutching onto anything that floats in this storm - the truth or Truth?

Truth today is an evolved term that doesn't necessarily have that much connection to what is actually true. In parts 9 and 10 of this series I take a sidetrip into the latest on the Twitter Files, related to Michael Shellenberger and his recent visit to the Rogan podcast. The subject here is once again Renee DiResta and her continuing central role in systematic new media censorship and suppression of opposition. But it's also about the rising tide of a dominant paradigm, that of "It's the government, stupid", which has been so heavily road-tested in the past, and specifically the JFK-sourced demons of the CIA/intelligence and the MIC. So once again we get to see in real time the absolute avoidance of the JQ and instead clutching onto anything that floats in this storm - the truth or Truth?

Truth today is an evolved term that doesn't necessarily have that much connection to what is actually true. In the remaining part of this series will focus on a recent interview of James Corbett framed around 9/11 Truth (and false flags), which explores what Truth means in the context of alternative thinking and will attempt to explain it basically in terms of science vs religion - is Truth really an evidence-based exploration of reality, or is it a matter of faith which provides answers that emotionally satisfy preexisting desires and vacuums of understanding? Or is it, circling back to neoliberalism, simply a matter of what sells? This part 8 continues with Corbett's view of 9/11 and the impact of 9/11 Truth, which I think he seriously overstates, and tightens the focus on the US government as perpetrator. This in turn apparently related to his slavish adherence to a particular worldview, that originally promoted by the JBS. Btw, the next part may be the last on this discussion, and then on to concluding this series with a brief return trip to the other Jimmy, Dore.

Truth today is an evolved term that doesn't necessarily have that much connection to what is actually true. In the remaining part of this series will focus on a recent interview of James Corbett framed around 9/11 Truth (and false flags), which explores what Truth means in the context of alternative thinking and will attempt to explain it basically in terms of science vs religion - is Truth really an evidence-based exploration of reality, or is it a matter of faith which provides answers that emotionally satisfy preexisting desires and vacuums of understanding? Or is it, circling back to neoliberalism, simply a matter of what sells? This part 7 I look more closely at Rumsfeld's missing $2.3 trillion, and then begin a run through a number of other aspects of the Corbett interview that are indicative of the interplay between his revolved worldview and his framing of 9/11 and Truth more generally.

Truth today is an evolved term that doesn't necessarily have that much connection to what is actually true. In the remaining part of this series will focus on a recent interview of James Corbett framed around 9/11 Truth (and false flags), which explores what Truth means in the context of alternative thinking and will attempt to explain it basically in terms of science vs religion - is Truth really an evidence-based exploration of reality, or is it a matter of faith which provides answers that emotionally satisfy preexisting desires and vacuums of understanding? Or is it, circling back to neoliberalism, simply a matter of what sells? This part 6 continues with Corbett's parallels between 9/11 and JFK as deep events, including his evolution in the discussion to a focus on the CIA and Pentagon and completely away from Israel, which I think reflects his actual understanding and/or agenda. It also includes more problematic story-telling related to his faulty "follow the money" focus.

Truth today is an evolved term that doesn't necessarily have that much connection to what is actually true. In the remaining part of this series will focus on a recent interview of James Corbett framed around 9/11 Truth (and false flags), which explores what Truth means in the context of alternative thinking and will attempt to explain it basically in terms of science vs religion - is Truth really an evidence-based exploration of reality, or is it a matter of faith which provides answers that emotionally satisfy preexisting desires and vacuums of understanding? Or is it, circling back to neoliberalism, simply a matter of what sells? Parts 4 and 5 focus on Corbett's view of 9/11, his areas of interest and its causes, including the paerallels he makes between it and JFK as deep events, especially his inclusion of Israeli interests as what appears to me to be a kind of "limited hangout" to placate certain elements of his following Sorry about the disjointedness, including in part 5, after my screen shut down - I will pull it back together in part 6 where I finish up on 9/11 and deep events and then move on to other aspects of this conversation.

Truth today is an evolved term that doesn't necessarily have that much connection to what is actually true. In the remaining part of this series will focus on a recent interview of James Corbett framed around 9/11 Truth (and false flags), which explores what Truth means in the context of alternative thinking and will attempt to explain it basically in terms of science vs religion - is Truth really an evidence-based exploration of reality, or is it a matter of faith which provides answers that emotionally satisfy preexisting desires and vacuums of understanding? Or is it, circling back to neoliberalism, simply a matter of what sells? Parts 4 and 5 focus on Corbett's view of 9/11, his areas of interest and its causes, including the paerallels he makes between it and JFK as deep events, especially his inclusion of Israeli interests as what appears to me to be a kind of "limited hangout" to placate certain elements of his following Sorry about the disjointedness, including in part 5, after my screen shut down - I will pull it back together in part 6 where I finish up on 9/11 and deep events and then move on to other aspects of this conversation.

Truth today is an evolved term that doesn't actually have that much connection to what is actually true. In the remaining part of this series will focus on a recent interview of James Corbett framed around 9/11 Truth (and false flags), which explores what Truth means in the context of alternative thinking and will attempt to explain it basically in terms of science vs religion - is Truth really an evidence-based exploration of reality, or is it a matter of faith which provides answers that emotionally satisfy preexisting desires and vacuums of understanding? Or is it, circling back to neoliberalism, simply a matter of what sells? Parts 2-3 (and beyond) focus on Corbett's evolution into a conspiracy theorist based on 9/11 Truth, the nature of that in those times, and the specifics of what he has focused on. Part 4 will at least start to cover this with respect to a comparison between JFK and 9/11 and how he factors in the Israelis/neocons/Zionists/Jews and their interests involved in these events, and how I think equating them is flawed analysis. From there, who knows where this will go... Sorry about wandering off into minutae of insurance coverage and getting cut off again at the end of part 3 - I will pick up from there in part 4.

Truth today is an evolved term that doesn't actually have that much connection to what is actually true. In the remaining part of this series will focus on a recent interview of James Corbett framed around 9/11 Truth (and false flags), which explores what Truth means in the context of alternative thinking and will attempt to explain it basically in terms of science vs religion - is Truth really an evidence-based exploration of reality, or is it a matter of faith which provides answers that emotionally satisfy preexisting desires and vacuums of understanding? Or is it, circling back to neoliberalism, simply a matter of what sells? Parts 2-3 (and beyond) focus on Corbett's evolution into a conspiracy theorist based on 9/11 Truth, the nature of that in those times, and the specifics of what he has focused on. Part 4 will at least start to cover this with respect to a comparison between JFK and 9/11 and how he factors in the Israelis/neocons/Zionists/Jews and their interests involved in these events, and how I think equating them is flawed analysis. From there, who knows where this will go... Sorry about wandering off into minutae of insurance coverage and getting cut off again at the end of part 3 - I will pick up from there in part 4.

Truth today is an evolved term that doesn't actually have that much connection to what is actually true. In this first part I look at Jimmy Dore promoting the notorious Jeffrey Sachs as a truth-teller, while they frame a false paradigm of massive black (African-American people of color) incarceration being caused by "white supremacist" racism, with no mention of any other factors that likely explain the very high level of US incarceration overall, including perhaps most importantly neoliberalism - something that Sachs was very involved in promoting worldwide. The remaining part of this series will focus on a recent interview of James Corbett framed around 9/11 Truth (and false flags), which explores what Truth means in the context of alternative thinking and will attempt to explain it basically in terms of science vs religion - is Truth really an evidence-based exploration of reality, or is it a matter of faith which provides answers that emotionally satisfy preexisting desires and vacuums of understanding? Or is it, circling back to neoliberalism, simply a matter of what sells?

Stretching this theme to the breaking point, today I add Jimmy Dore to this picture, as he addresses Taibbi's latest series of TF tweets using standard takes right off the alternative progressive-libertarian left's go-to shitpile - it's the government, the military-industrial complex, the Dem Party is owned by Big Pharma, it's all about corporate money, etc., etc., he even finally gets to throw around nazis in the end. And he actually shows us one of the leading characters in all of this ethno-warfare, but fails to even identify her - assuming he knows who she is, or fucking cares. *Sigh*...

Circling back to the T-File deniers, I finish with James Corbett, but with embellishment from the Grayzone guys, Larken Rose and G. Edward Griffin, and finally Amy Goodman and James Bamford. More specifically, I try to show how GZ tackles the critical matter of neoconservatism striaght on but without any mention of its Jewish backbone, while Corbett's JQ-denier approach is similar but more crippling, because he is explicit in what is intellectually invalid, which is looking at groups of people instead of simply ideas. This is exacerbated by his primary mission appearing to be promotion of his utopian fantasy of anarchy. But his approach has a long history, going back a half century to the John Birch Society and his mentor Griffin, even if it also has the same contemporary slipperiness as that of, say, Sam Harris. I finish with the story of "Israelgating" for the election of Trump in 2016, Ashkenocracy Now's effort at history and warning, in Timothy Snyder terms. The bottom line here is how blatantly stupid it is to say voting doesn't matter and is immoral, and more importantly that groups don't matter and that it's effectively immoral to think in those terms. Especially today, when the negative impact of one particular group is utterly apparent and obvious. This deranged worldview makes itself felt in ignoring the Twitter Files, despite what they have shown about suppression of free speech on the internet and, depending on how one looks at it, the government role in that, especially the intelligence agencies.

Circling back to the T-File deniers, I finish with James Corbett, but with embellishment from the Grayzone guys, Larken Rose and G. Edward Griffin, and finally Amy Goodman and James Bamford. More specifically, I try to show how GZ tackles the critical matter of neoconservatism striaght on but without any mention of its Jewish backbone, while Corbett's JQ-denier approach is similar but more crippling, because he is explicit in what is intellectually invalid, which is looking at groups of people instead of simply ideas. This is exacerbated by his primary mission appearing to be promotion of his utopian fantasy of anarchy. But his approach has a long history, going back a half century to the John Birch Society and his mentor Griffin, even if it also has the same contemporary slipperiness as that of, say, Sam Harris. I finish with the story of "Israelgating" for the election of Trump in 2016, Ashkenocracy Now's effort at history and warning, in Timothy Snyder terms. The bottom line here is how blatantly stupid it is to say voting doesn't matter and is immoral, and more importantly that groups don't matter and that it's effectively immoral to think in those terms. Especially today, when the negative impact of one particular group is utterly apparent and obvious. This deranged worldview makes itself felt in ignoring the Twitter Files, despite what they have shown about suppression of free speech on the internet and, depending on how one looks at it, the government role in that, especially the intelligence agencies.

Circling back to the T-File deniers, I finish with James Corbett, but with embellishment from the Grayzone guys, Larken Rose and G. Edward Griffin, and finally Amy Goodman and James Bamford. More specifically, I try to show how GZ tackles the critical matter of neoconservatism striaght on but without any mention of its Jewish backbone, while Corbett's JQ-denier approach is similar but more crippling, because he is explicit in what is intellectually invalid, which is looking at groups of people instead of simply ideas. This is exacerbated by his primary mission appearing to be promotion of his utopian fantasy of anarchy. But his approach has a long history, going back a half century to the John Birch Society and his mentor Griffin, even if it also has the same contemporary slipperiness as that of, say, Sam Harris. I finish with the story of "Israelgating" for the election of Trump in 2016, Ashkenocracy Now's effort at history and warning, in Timothy Snyder terms. The bottom line here is how blatantly stupid it is to say voting doesn't matter and is immoral, and more importantly that groups don't matter and that it's effectively immoral to think in those terms. Especially today, when the negative impact of one particular group is utterly apparent and obvious. This deranged worldview makes itself felt in ignoring the Twitter Files, despite what they have shown about suppression of free speech on the internet and, depending on how one looks at it, the government role in that, especially the intelligence agencies.

After finishing up on Taibbi/Iversen I shift back to the T-File deniers, first diving back into Corbett/Webb on 9/11 and deep events, which is used as a way of bashing Taibbi as a journalist. That includes Matt-adjacent Glenn Greenwald, which gets me to Sam Harris, and then closing the loop to Kyle Kulinski the philosemite denier Dem-bashing Musk. These circular motions may get me back to Corbett again, but that's for another day...

After finishing up on Taibbi/Iversen I shift back to the T-File deniers, first diving back into Corbett/Webb on 9/11 and deep events, which is used as a way of bashing Taibbi as a journalist. That includes Matt-adjacent Glenn Greenwald, which gets me to Sam Harris, and then closing the loop to Kyle Kulinski the philosemite denier Dem-bashing Musk. These circular motions may get me back to Corbett again, but that's for another day...