What is Truth? part 3

Truth today is an evolved term that doesn't actually have that much connection to what is actually true. In the remaining part of this series will focus on a recent interview of James Corbett framed around 9/11 Truth (and false flags), which explores what Truth means in the context of alternative thinking and will attempt to explain it basically in terms of science vs religion - is Truth really an evidence-based exploration of reality, or is it a matter of faith which provides answers that emotionally satisfy preexisting desires and vacuums of understanding? Or is it, circling back to neoliberalism, simply a matter of what sells?

Parts 2-3 (and beyond) focus on Corbett's evolution into a conspiracy theorist based on 9/11 Truth, the nature of that in those times, and the specifics of what he has focused on. Part 4 will at least start to cover this with respect to a comparison between JFK and 9/11 and how he factors in the Israelis/neocons/Zionists/Jews and their interests involved in these events, and how I think equating them is flawed analysis. From there, who knows where this will go...

Sorry about wandering off into minutae of insurance coverage and getting cut off again at the end of part 3 - I will pick up from there in part 4.