CPDChina

TRAYCE BRADFORD, Eagle Forum’s National Issues on Human Trafficking and Policy Advisor for Freedoms Fund USA, Past President for Eagle Forum Texas, former candidate for Lieutenant Governor of Texas – Topic: Current bills before Congress

RON ARMSTRONG, President, Stand Up Michigan – Topic: How the China Model hurt individuals and empowered authoritarian leaders like Gov. Whitmer

What do the Intelligence Leaks Tell us about the State of U.S. Alliances and Our Enemies’ Calculations? In recent days, what are presented as some fifty leaked classified documents have become the subject of a global, strategic feeding-frenzy involving, among others, America’s friends and foes, alike. While the authenticity of at least a subset of these materials is in question, others are evidently actual reports on U.S. assessments and operations involving sensitive subjects around the world. This CPDC webinar assesses both the damage being done by such unauthorized disclosures and what they say about the state of the U.S. relations with allied nations and America’s posture vis a vis a growing number of hostile ones. Moderator: - Frank Gaffney, Founder and Executive Chairman, Center for Security Policy; Vice Chairman, Committee on the Present Danger: China Panelists: - Col. John Mills, U.S. Army (Ret.), U.S. Army (Ret.), Former Special Operator specializing in Psychological Warfare; former senior official responsible for Cyber Policy in the Office of Secretary of Defense; author, The Nation Will Follow: Firsthand Experiences Fighting the Deep State and the Action Plan for the American Citizen – Topic: “A Damage Assessment on the Latest Intelligence Leaks” - Brian Kennedy, Chairman, Committee on the Present Danger: China, former President, the Claremont Institute; President, American Strategy Group – Topic: “Is America ‘Back’? The Biden Foreign Policy Legacy to Date” - Dr. David Wurmser, PhD – Former Navy Intelligence Officer; former Middle East advisor to the Under Secretary of State, National Security Advisor and Vice President of the United States, Director Mideast Policy, Center for Security Policy – Topic: Biden’s Tossed Matches in the Mideast Tinderbox” - Col. Grant Newsham, U.S. Marine Corps (Ret.), former Foreign Service Officer, corporate executive; Senior Fellow, Center for Security Policy, author When China Attacks: A Warning to America -- Topic: “The Imperative Need for Robust Alliances as War Looms in the Pacific” - Dr. Bradley Thayer, PhD, Director for China Policy, Center for Security Policy; co-author, Understanding the China Threat and How China Sees the World: Han Centrism and the Balance of Power in International Politics -- Topic: “What We Must Do Now: Treat Friends Better than Enemies”

Why the US Must Withdraw from the WHO - And How it Can Be Done If you disliked the way you and our country were treated in response to the COVID pandemic, you are going to hate what those who perpetrated the mask, lockdown and vaccine mandates intend to do to us next. The World Health Organization (WHO), led by its Director-General Dr. Tedros Ghebreyesus, the Chinese Communist Party that controls them, and the Biden administration are negotiating agreements that would allow Tedros to dictate public health policy in the United States and globally. The WHO would accomplish this via one or both of two instruments that would oblige the U.S. and other parties to the WHO to submit to whatever the organization’s Director-General deems to be an actual or prospective “Public Health Emergency of International Concern” (PHEIC) – and whatever he determines is the appropriate response. And such PHEICs can include perceived emergencies other than pandemics, including for example: gun violence, mistreatment of undocumented migrants, insufficient acclimate change or even crises involving plants or animals. The two instruments are: 1) transformative amendments to the International Health Regulations; and 2) an entirely new agreement governing “pandemic prevention, preparedness and response.”The first of these is expected to be approved in May 2023, the second a year later. The WHO refuses to call either of them “treaties” in an attempt to circumvent the U.S. ratification process. Neither instrument can be fixed as they inherently violate our Constitution and rights. Unless the United States withdraws from the World Health Organization, it will be bound by whatever a majority of WHO members agree upon, to the detriment of our national sovereignty and personal freedoms. After Tedros and the World Health Organization’s catastrophic mishandling of the COVID-19 pandemic, it is utterly unacceptable to give them still more, let alone totalitarian, control of our public health. In light of the enormity of the stakes, preventing the United States from being subjected to such medical tyranny has taken on a unique urgency. That is expecially true since the WHO voting on the amendments to the International Health Regulations will occur at the end of May – weeks before the Dept Ceiling debate will likely occur. And, all other things being equal, we will immediately be obliged to comply. Hence, we must immediately extricate ourselves from the World Health Organization by making that outcome a non-negotiable condition precedent for even negotiating about the Debt Ceiling. Key Reasons to Withdraw from the WHO Among the amendments that would fundamentally transform the International Health Regulations are the following: The word “non-binding” has been deleted to make the “recommendations” of the WHO The WHO will be able to intervene not only when an active public health risk exists, but also when the public health risk is only Under Article 9 would be amended to authorize the WHO rely on undisclosed sources for information declaring a public health emergency which need not be shared with the affected nation(s). Article 12 would be amended to authorize the Director-General may to declare unilaterally a potential or actual public health emergency of international concern. That authority can justify the imposition and enforcement of sanctions on nations that insist on exercising their sovereign right not to comply with WHO dictates. The proposed Pandemic Treaty: Establishes Global Surveillance arrangements via Vaccine Passports, Smart Health Cards, or other forms of digital IDs, Trojan horses for insinuating a Chinese-style “Social Credit System” globally. Commits governments to censor dissenting views (Article 17, p. 23). “The Parties commit to…tackle false, misleading misinformation or disinformation...each party is encouraged…to counteract misinformation, disinformation and false news, thereby strengthening publictrust.” “One Health Approach” (Article 18, #3, p. 24). One Health includes not only human health, but also the health of animals, agricultural plants and the environment. If passed, the WHO would have control over every aspect of existence on earth. Meanwhile, it has just come to light that, hidden deep within the FY2023 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), is another act that – according to an expert in international treaty law, Dr. Frances Boyle, JD, PhD – appears to have given prior U.S. approval to whatever instruments are adopted by the WHO.This act-within-an-ac is named theGlobal Health Security and International Pandemic Prevention, Preparedness and Response Act of 2022.It is found onpage 950of the 1,772-page NDAA, which Biden signed into law on December 23, 2022. In other words, if we remain in the WHO, we will be enslaved by it. A further impetus for immediate U.S. withdrawal from the WHO is that the instrument amending the IHRs may not be the only accord to come to a vote at the World Health Assembly in May 2023. While the new Pandemic treaty is scheduled to do so in May 2024, it could conceivably also be taken up this May. Whatever the timing, both instruments will likely be approved even without U.S. support, in the first case by a simple majority vote of the World Health Assembly, in which – like the UN General Assembly – every nation has just one vote and the United States cannot exercise a veto. In the second case, a two-thirds majority is required and the U.S. still has no veto. Once adopted, these instruments will enter provisionally into force and, especially in light of the Global Health Security Act, become binding on this country and every other WHO member nation. Consequently, if the United States is to be spared such an unacceptable surrender of its national sovereignty – with all that portends for its people, their freedoms and wellbeing, Congress must insist that this country: ceases immediately to be a member of the WHO; will not be further funding its operations; and will not be bound by its regulations and diktats.

New ‘Sovereignty Coalition’ Unveils Campaign to Prevent the Surrender of American Freedom Seeks US Removal from a Dangerous World Health Organization on Steroids A remarkable, non-partisan group of patriotic, public policy-minded leaders, organizations and individuals have announced on April 56, 2023, the formation of the new “Sovereignty Coalition.” The Coalition is rooted in a shared, profound commitment to the U.S. Constitution and the God-given freedoms it guarantees. Its participants are determined to protect these foundations of our Republic by defending our national sovereignty against all enemies, foreign and domestic. The Coalition’s immediate priority is to prevent efforts to create unaccountable global governance arrangements and authorities wholly at odds with our sovereign, constitutional form of representative, limited government. Foremost among such initiatives is the attempt by the Chinese Communist Party, Bill Gates, the pharmaceutical industry and other globalists — including the Biden administration, to empower the World Health Organization (WHO) to dictate U.S. and other nations’ public health policies. To that end, the Coalition has adopted and is seeking public support for the “American Sovereignty Declaration.” This Declaration reads in part: The World Health Organization is a supranational United Nations agency that is effectively controlled by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), as evidenced, among other things, by the manner in which the WHO’s Director-General, Dr. Tedros Ghebreyesus, has relentlessly accomplished Beijing’s bidding. That includes advancing the CCP’s interest in bringing about a post-constitutional-America and “global governance” dominated by the Party. The CCP’s hegemonic ambitions have no place for a powerful United States of America, human freedom or personal sovereignty. The WHO is, moreover, underwritten and malignly influenced by other hostile special interests, including Bill Gates and Big Pharma. Their efforts to expand the WHO’s supranational control align with Beijing’s… These factors make it hardly surprising that, in the course of the COVID-19 pandemic, the WHO lied about the nature, origins and effective responses to the Wuhan Virus. The “China Model” of lockdowns, masks and vaccine mandates and digital enforcement mechanisms was endorsed. And the WHO approved the use of expensive and inadequately tested gene therapies as “vaccinations” and the suppression of readily available, effective and inexpensive treatments. Thanks in part to such misconduct, the pandemic has resulted in the deaths of over a million Americans and many more elsewhere around the world, an untold number of whom perished needlessly. Given the WHO’s appalling record, it is outrageous that the Biden administration is working to give the WHO and its Director-General more power over sovereign nations, including the United States. Yet, U.S. government officials are actively negotiating amendments to existing International Health Regulations and a new treaty governing future pandemics. These accords would effectively repose in Dr. Tedros the authority unilaterally to dictate what constitutes an actual or potential Public Health Emergency of International Concern (PHEIC) and to order how affected nations must respond… In the hands of the CCP and its friends, that authority would allow enemies of this country, foreign and domestic, to deprive Americans of their constitutional rights and other statutory protections. The WHO’s Director-General may deem, for example, gun violence, climate change, problems afflicting plants or animals and so-called “disinformation” to be causing so-called public health emergencies. Such a surrender of national sovereignty over public health would be bad enough. In practice, however, it will translate into a loss of personal sovereignty, as well, notably as a result of WHO directives that may interfere with individual patients’ treatment by their physician… What the WHO has euphemistically dubbed its “One Health” approach would directly interfere with the patient-physician relationship by dictating the way physicians diagnose and treat individuals in their care… And through a system of “Global Health Certificates,” the World Health Organization seeks to institute a system of digital documentation, including certificates for tests, vaccinations, other prescribed preventative measures, recovery and even travel.

New ‘Sovereignty Coalition’ Unveils Campaign to Prevent the Surrender of American Freedom Seeks US Removal from a Dangerous World Health Organization on Steroids WASHINGTON — A remarkable, non-partisan group of patriotic, public policy-minded leaders, organizations and individuals have announced on April 56, 2023, the formation of the new “Sovereignty Coalition.” The Coalition is rooted in a shared, profound commitment to the U.S. Constitution and the God-given freedoms it guarantees. Its participants are determined to protect these foundations of our Republic by defending our national sovereignty against all enemies, foreign and domestic. The Coalition’s immediate priority is to prevent efforts to create unaccountable global governance arrangements and authorities wholly at odds with our sovereign, constitutional form of representative, limited government. Foremost among such initiatives is the attempt by the Chinese Communist Party, Bill Gates, the pharmaceutical industry and other globalists — including the Biden administration, to empower the World Health Organization (WHO) to dictate U.S. and other nations’ public health policies. To that end, the Coalition has adopted and is seeking public support for the “American Sovereignty Declaration.” This Declaration reads in part: The World Health Organization is a supranational United Nations agency that is effectively controlled by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), as evidenced, among other things, by the manner in which the WHO’s Director-General, Dr. Tedros Ghebreyesus, has relentlessly accomplished Beijing’s bidding. That includes advancing the CCP’s interest in bringing about a post-constitutional-America and “global governance” dominated by the Party. The CCP’s hegemonic ambitions have no place for a powerful United States of America, human freedom or personal sovereignty. The WHO is, moreover, underwritten and malignly influenced by other hostile special interests, including Bill Gates and Big Pharma. Their efforts to expand the WHO’s supranational control align with Beijing’s… These factors make it hardly surprising that, in the course of the COVID-19 pandemic, the WHO lied about the nature, origins and effective responses to the Wuhan Virus. The “China Model” of lockdowns, masks and vaccine mandates and digital enforcement mechanisms was endorsed. And the WHO approved the use of expensive and inadequately tested gene therapies as “vaccinations” and the suppression of readily available, effective and inexpensive treatments. Thanks in part to such misconduct, the pandemic has resulted in the deaths of over a million Americans and many more elsewhere around the world, an untold number of whom perished needlessly. Given the WHO’s appalling record, it is outrageous that the Biden administration is working to give the WHO and its Director-General more power over sovereign nations, including the United States. Yet, U.S. government officials are actively negotiating amendments to existing International Health Regulations and a new treaty governing future pandemics. These accords would effectively repose in Dr. Tedros the authority unilaterally to dictate what constitutes an actual or potential Public Health Emergency of International Concern (PHEIC) and to order how affected nations must respond… In the hands of the CCP and its friends, that authority would allow enemies of this country, foreign and domestic, to deprive Americans of their constitutional rights and other statutory protections. The WHO’s Director-General may deem, for example, gun violence, climate change, problems afflicting plants or animals and so-called “disinformation” to be causing so-called public health emergencies. Such a surrender of national sovereignty over public health would be bad enough. In practice, however, it will translate into a loss of personal sovereignty, as well, notably as a result of WHO directives that may interfere with individual patients’ treatment by their physician… What the WHO has euphemistically dubbed its “One Health” approach would directly interfere with the patient-physician relationship by dictating the way physicians diagnose and treat individuals in their care… And through a system of “Global Health Certificates,” the World Health Organization seeks to institute a system of digital documentation, including certificates for tests, vaccinations, other prescribed preventative measures, recovery and even travel. As a means of institutionalizing such certificates and accessing the data they contain, the WHO and its masters envision compelling the universal adoption of digital health IDs. Americans have already experienced how such “vaccine passports” can be used to enforce “jab” mandates and otherwise control individuals’ movements, activities and access to food, employment, education, finances, places of worship, etc. The Communist Party has honed such totalitarian techniques into a “Social Credit System” inside the People’s Republic of China (PRC) and is now working to export it worldwide. Once combined with interoperable, global Central Bank Digital Currencies (also under development and backed by the Chinese Communist Party, the Biden administration, the World Economic Forum, World Bank, G-20, and other supranational globalist organizations), the WHO could enforce its medical tyranny by severing unvaccinated individuals from their bank accounts and credit cards. They would thus be trapped in a “digital gulag” unless and until they comply with whatever protocol the WHO deems advantageous to its CCP-influenced interests. We believe that our sovereignty, constitutional Republic and personal freedoms must be protected from such a supranational threat. Therefore, the first mission of the Sovereignty Coalition is to ensure that the United States no longer underwrites, participates in or is subject to the World Health Organization and to seek, in the WHO’s stead, to create well-defined and limited arrangements for voluntarily collaborating multilaterally in the event of transnational pandemics. Moderator: FRANK GAFFNEY, Executive Chairman, Center for Security Policy; Host, “Securing America with Frank Gaffney”; and Vice-chair, Committee on the Present Danger: China Panelists: REGGIE LITTLEJOHN, President of Women’s Rights Without Frontiers, Co-Chair of the Stop Vaccine Passports Task Force – Topic: Digital Gulag and the Chinese Social Credit System, Digital IDs and CBDC Dr. DAVID BELL, Senior Scholar at Brownstone Institute, is a public health physician and biotech consultant in global health. He is a former medical officer and scientist at the World Health Organization (WHO), Programme Head for malaria and febrile diseases at the Foundation for Innovative New Diagnostics (FIND) in Geneva, Switzerland, and Director of Global Health Technologies at Intellectual Ventures Global Good Fund in Bellevue, WA, USA – Topic: Chasing profit not disease burdon and seeking centralized, global control. And the OneHealth philosophy. KEVIN FREEMAN, CFA, Host of “Economic War Room with Kevin Freeman”; President, National Security Investment Consultants Institute; author, “Secret Weapon”, “Game Plan” and “According to Plan” – Topic: The nefariousness of CBDC Dr. KATARINA LINDLEY, MD, A Croatian-born, American-trained board-certified family physician; President, Texas Osteopathic Medical Association; involved with the American Academy of Physicians and Surgeons, and the Global Covid Summit – Topic: Medical freedom and physician/patient relationship JOSHUA STYLMAN, Contributor, Brownstone Institute – Topic: Personal testimony. It was bad when the W.H.O. was only an advisory committee, it will be much worse when they have the power to mandate how nations respond JENNY BETH MARTIN, Co-Founder and National Coordinator, Tea Party Patriots Dr. NAOMI WOLF, PhD, Author of bestselling “The Bodies of Others,” Founder and CEO of Daily Clout; Rhodes Scholar and Yale Graduate Lt Gen. WILLIAM “JERRY” BOYKIN, U.S. Army (Ret.), former Deputy Under Secretary of Defense KRIS ULLMAN, President, Eagle Forum – Topic: What can the grassroots do? Congressional and state-level outreach PAM PRYOR, Former Senior Bureau Official for International Organizational Affairs during the Trump administration, former Senior Advisor to the Under Secretary for Civilian Security, Democracy, and Human Rights ELIZABETH LEE VLIET, MD, President and CEO, Truth for Health Foundation; Preventive and Climacteric Medicine; author of “It’s My Ovaries, Stupid!” and “Screaming to Be Heard: Hormone Connections Women Suspect and Doctors Still Ignore” Honorable/Lt Col. CHUCK DEVORE, U.S. Army Reserves (Ret.); former member, California State Assembly; Chief National Initiatives Officer, Texas Public Policy Institute; co-author, “China Attacks” STEPHANI SCRUGGS, Liberty Counsel, former COO for Coalition for a Strong America JONATHAN ALEXANDRE, Esq., Senior Counsel for Government Affairs, Liberty Counsel Hon. MICHELE BACHMANN, Member of Congress (2007-2015); Presidential candidate (2012); Dean, Robertson School of Government, Regent University TREVOR LOUDON, Author and filmmaker, “The Enemies Within” and “The Enemies Within the Church”; contributor, Epoch Times – Topic: China’s Outsize Influence at the WHO; The WHO’s Pandemic Response and the China Model Dr. KARLADINE GRAVES, MD, family physician TRAYCE BRADFORD, Eagle Forum’s National Issues on Human Trafficking and Policy Advisor for Freedoms Fund USA, Past President for Eagle Forum Texas, former candidate for Lieutenant Governor of Texas – Topic: Current bills before Congress JAMES ROGUSKI, Author, activist and essayist, Substack.com and StoptheWho.com – Topic: The Stealth Campaign to Expand the WHO’s Power to the Detriment of U.S. Sovereignty and the CCP’s Benefit” RON ARMSTRONG, President, Stand Up Michigan – Topic: How the China Model hurt individuals and empowered authoritarian leaders like Gov. Whitmer

A Case Study in Chinese State-level Elite Capture and Subversive Influence Operations Michigan Governor Gretchen Whitmer’s outrageous plan to give the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) doing business as Gotion High-Tech Co., Ltd., $715 million in taxpayer subsidies to build an electric vehicle battery plant near Big Rapids, Michigan is finally encountering the kind of resistance it deserves. This is but the latest example of the CCP’s efforts to penetrate and subvert America at the state-level with influence operations aimed at governors. Despite a strong warning to the National Governors Association in February 2020 by then-Secretary of State Mike Pompeo concerning the CCP’s targeting of states and localities, Gov. Whitmer, members of the Michigan legislature, local officials and their counterparts in several other states have been seduced by the prospect of Chinese investment, jobs and technology to open the doors to what are, in fact, CCP Trojan Horses. Typically, such promises are unfulfilled and the CCP is, instead, the beneficiary in all three respects. In the case of Gotion, the direct role of the Chinese Communist Party in the company, its management and operations is a matter of record. For example, Gotion’s Articles of Association establish that: The Company shall set up a Party organization and carry out Party activities in accordance with the Constitution of the Communist Party of China. The Company shall ensure necessary conditions for carrying out Party activities. The secretary of the Party shall be the chairman…. The Party Committee of the Company shall perform its duties in accordance with the Constitution of the Communist Party of China and other Party regulations,” including, “Ensure and supervise the implementation of the Party’s guidelines, principles and policies in the Company, and implement major strategic decisions of the CPC (Communist Party of China) Central Committee and the State Council as well as relevant important work arrangements of the Party organization at the higher level. The fact that such a company is allowed to operate anywhere in the United States is unconscionable. The idea that Michigan or any other American taxpayers would be subsidizing its operations here adds insult to the prospectively huge injury. It should be obvious to the Committee on Foreign Investment (CFIUS) in the United States that national security considerations demand this CCP Trojan Horse be blocked immediately. Moderator: - Frank Gaffney, Founder and Executive Chairman, Center for Security Policy; Vice Chairman, Committee on the Present Danger: China Panelists: - Hon. Pete Hoekstra, former Member of Congress and Chairman of the House Intelligence Committee; former U.S. Ambassador to the Netherlands; Chairman, Center for Security Policy Advisory Board Topic: “CFIUS Must Do Its Job: No Go on Gotion” (via video) - Ron Armstrong, President, Stand Up Michigan Topic: “The Grassroots in Michigan: Don’t Subsidize the CCP’s Penetration of America” - Dr. Ormand Hook, Ed.D, Educational psychologist, military veteran, Michigan activist against Gotion penetration Topic: “Not with Our Money: Block the Gotion Deal” - Lori Brock, Owner, Majestic Frisian’s Horse Farm, Big Rapids, Michigan, patriot, opponent of the Gotion deal Topic: “An American Citizen’s Appeal for No Go on Gotion”

Joe Biden, A Case Study in Chinese “Elite Capture” Evidence continues to emerge of an alarming threat to U.S. national security. It includes recent revelations by congressional investigators examining the nature and extent of Joe Biden’s longstanding, personal and lucrative dealings and those of his family with businesses and individuals tied to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) – among them known members of its intelligence services. What could possibly go wrong? The short answer is plenty. The possibility that the United States’ Commander-in-Chief is now what one career CIA undercover operative, Charles “Sam” Faddis, has described as a “controlled asset” of the CCP has the most dire national security implications imaginable. That is especially true at a moment when the Chinese Communists are openly threatening a shooting war with us. Even worse is the reality of actual decision-making and policies of what is best described as the Chi-den administration, which have two common-denominators: 1) They are consistently harmful to America. And 2) they consistently redound to the benefit the Chinese Communist Party. The latest, alarming insights into our country’s “Enemy Within” threat at the highest levels of the U.S. government will be the subject of this CPDC webinar – the latest in a series of now more than seventy such programs illuminating the CCP’s “unrestricted warfare” against America and the help Beijing is receiving from elites “captured” by its United Front Work Department and other influence operations. Moderator: - Frank Gaffney, Founder and Executive Chairman, Center for Security Policy; Vice Chairman, Committee on the Present Danger: China Panelists: - Peter Schweizer, Investigative Journalist; President, the Government Accountability Institute; best-selling author, “Red Handed: How American Elites Get Rich Helping China Win,” Co-host of The Drill Down podcast – Topic: “The Chinese Communist Party’s ‘Elite Capture’ and its Success in Targeting America’s Leadership” - Miranda Devine, Columnist, New York Post; author, Laptop From Hell: Hunter Biden, Big Tech, and the Dirty Secrets the President Tried to Hide – Topic: “The Latest Evidence of Joe Biden’s ‘Capture’ by the Chinese Communist Party” - Trevor Loudon, Author and filmmaker, “The Enemies Within” and “The Enemies Within the Church”; contributor, Epoch Times – Topic: “Biden, the ‘Chi-den Administration’ and Other Captured Elites among America’s Political Leadership” - Brian Kennedy, Chairman, Committee on the Present Danger: China; President of American Strategy Group; Former President, Claremont Institute – Topic: “The Strategic Threat Posed to U.S. National Security by the CCP’s Capture of Joe Biden and Other Elites – and What’s to Be

Insights About Elite-Capture and Influence Operations on Both Sides of the Border Recent revelations by former Canadian intelligence officers indicate that, in the 1990s, American counterparts raised alarms about the Chinese Communist Party’s penetration and “capture” of governmental and private sector elites in Canada posing a threat to both countries. A U.S. initiative code-named “Project Dragon Lord” and a Canadian one called “Sidewinder” were ignored, allowing the CCP threat to metastasize dramatically to the profound detriment of the national security north and south of the border. The insights being offered into the extent of the “elite capture,” election interference, transnational criminal activity, corruption and subversion in a key allied nation affords a profoundly important case study of the CCP’s “unrestricted warfare” that has, if anything, taken an even greater toll in the United States. The intensifying debate in Canada about the harm done to date, both that now in evidence and that yet to be fully revealed, makes plain the need for a similar and comprehensive damage-assessment in this country, as well. This CPDC webinar takes stock of what we can learn from the CCP United Front Work Department’s successes in Canada and the corrective actions required on the part of both of these “Five-Eyes” partners to root out enemies within and secure their democratic polities. Moderator: - Frank Gaffney, Founder and Executive Chairman, Center for Security Policy; Vice Chairman, Committee on the Present Danger: China Panelists: - Jan Jekielek, Senior Editor, Epoch Times and host of its “American Thought Leaders” program – Topic: “The Chinese Communist Party’s ‘Magic Weapon’ – The United Front Work Department and Its Ominous Successes” - Michel Juneau-Katsuya, Former Chief of Canadian Intelligence (CSIS), Asia-Pacific Division – Topic: “Warnings Ignored, Canada and the United States Imperiled” (via video) - Charles “Sam” Faddis, Former Career Clandestine Service Officer, Central Intelligence Agency; Army veteran; author, The Decline and Fall of the CIA; editor, AndMagazine.com at Substack – Topic: “The CCP’s Toxic Tradecraft for Subverting Countries – What We Must Do to Counter It” - Scott McGregor, Veteran of Canada’s Army, Navy and Air Force; former intelligence officer, Royal Canadian Mounted Police; co-author, The Mosaic Effect: How the Chinese Communist Party Started a Hybrid War in America’s Backyard – Topic: “Why the CCP’s Hybrid Warfare is Succeeding and the Implications for North American Security” (via video)

In the course of the recently concluded National People’s Congress in Beijing, dictator Xi Jinping and his new Foreign Minister Qin Gong made a point of threatening the United States. Xi specifically accused the U.S. of leading Western countries in “containing, encircling and suppressing China.” For his part, Qin warned that conflict is “inevitable” unless America “changes course.” Unfortunately, such bellicose rhetoric is being accompanied by actions that are clearly designed to give the CCP the option to wage not only the “unrestricted warfare” in which it has been engaged for decades against our country, but the shooting kind, as well. Publicly evident examples of what should be considered “indicators and warnings” of preparations for violent – and, in all likelihood, preemptive – Chinese action include the following: - Heightened PLA military operations and exercises suggesting a determined effort both to intimidate opponents and enhance the readiness of active duty and reserve forces, paramilitary and supporting “civil-military”-fused industrial assets and infrastructure; - Video of a secret, senior-level mobilization-planning session in Guangdong Province - Chinese hoarding of food, fertilizers, critical minerals and other commodities, equipment, etc. that would be particularly valuable during and after war Restrictions on supply chains exporting such stuff - Increased activity in Belt and Road Initiative infrastructure that suggests ports, airfields and other assets around the world are being readied to support CCP power-projection - Evidence that it is becoming more difficult to repatriate dollars invested in China - Intensified Chinese espionage and intelligence activity in and over the U.S. - Intensified Chinese elite capture and influence operations inside the U.S. This CPDC webinar examines these and related topics – and the necessity for the United States to adopt a war-footing, both to enhance our deterrent to the CCP actually initiating hostilities and, if necessary, to defeat the perpetrators. Moderator: - Frank Gaffney, Founder and Executive Chairman, Center for Security Policy; Vice Chairman, Committee on the Present Danger: China Panelists: - Gordon G. Chang, Esq. JD, subject matter expert, Senior Fellow, Gatestone Institute, author, The Coming Collapse of China, essayist, Newsweek, Epoch Times and other outlets – Topic: Telegraphed Punch: Evidence of the CCP’s Intent to Wage a Shooting War Against America - Ross Kennedy, Founder, Fortis Analysis; a long-time executive and consultant in the food production sector – Topic: Symptoms of China’s War-footing: Hoarding and Restricting Supply Chains - Charles “Sam” Faddis, Former Clandestine Service Officer, Central Intelligence Agency; author, Beyond Repair: The Decline and Fall of the CIA; essayist, AndMagazine.com at Substack – Topic: Indicators and Warnings: Why U.S. Intelligence is Dropping the Ball, Again - Kevin Freeman, CFA, Economic warfare expert; host, “Economic War Room with Kevin Freeman”; author, Secret Weapon, Game Plan and According to Plan – Topic: Key Indicators and Warnings: the CCP’s intensifying Economic Warfare Against America - Dr. Bradley Thayer, PhD, Director, China Program, Center for Security Policy; co-author, Understanding the China Threat; essayist, The Hill, Epoch Times and other publications – Topic: What America Must Do: Preserve the Peace by Preparing for War

The Ingraham Angle | Fox News | March 8, 2023 If you disliked the way you and our country were treated in response to the COVID pandemic, you are going to hate what those who perpetrated the mask, lockdown and vaccine mandates intend to do to us next. The World Health Organization (WHO), led by its Director-General Dr. Tedros Ghebreyesus, the Chinese Communist Party that controls them, and the Biden administration are negotiating agreements that would allow Tedros to dictate public health policy in the United States and globally. The WHO would accomplish this via one or both of two instruments that would oblige the U.S. and other parties to the WHO to submit to whatever the organization’s Director-General deems to be an actual or prospective “Public Health Emergency of International Concern” (PHEIC). Ditto whatever he determines is the appropriate response. Such PHEICs can include perceived emergencies other than pandemics, perhaps including: gun violence; insufficient abortion services; excess use of fossil fuels; inadequate accommodations for illegal aliens, climate change or even “crises” involving plants or animals. The two instruments are: a) transformative amendments to the International Health Regulations: and b) an entirely new agreement governing “pandemic prevention, preparedness and response." The former is expected to be approved in late May; the latter may be, as well. Both accords are predicated on the global adoption of digital health cards or “vaccine passports.” These will not only contain private health data. enable surveillance, tracking and control of individuals and populations worldwide. That is especially so when they are coupled with Central Bank Digital Currencies that can deny the unvaccinated or otherwise non-compliant access to, or use of, their money. Both instruments cannot be fixed as they inherently violate our Constitution and rights. Unless the United States withdraws from the WHO, we will be bound by whatever a majority of its members agree upon, to the detriment of our national sovereignty and personal freedoms. After Tedros and the World Health Organization’s catastrophic mishandling of the COVID-19 pandemic, it is utterly unacceptable to give them any additional, let alone totalitarian, control of our public health. The threat to our country, personal wellbeing and freedoms posed by a WHO that will be able to translate its new, unchecked authority without accountability into the opportunity to dictate Americans’ personal health care demands immediate action by the Congress. Legislators must use the leverage arising from the Biden administration’s insistence on raising the Debt Ceiling to compel the President to withdraw from the WHO now. There must be no further negotiations on adding to our national debt until the President has formally notified the World Health Organization that we will not: be a member; provide $450 million per year of U.S. taxpayers’ funds to pay for its operations; or be subjected to its amended health regulations and/or new pandemic accord. Take action here - https://stopvaxpassports.org/take-action-withdraw-us-from-the-w-h-o-now/

Over the past two weeks, U.S. and other members of the World Health Organization (WHO) have been negotiating on ways to give sweeping new powers to the WHO’s Director-General, Dr. Tedros Ghebreyesus. Through material changes to existing international health regulations and/or a new pandemic accord, Dr. Tedros would be able to declare actual or potential “public health emergencies of international concern” in any country on the basis of privately supplied information and without the agreement of the nation(s) affected. Worse yet, he can unilaterally dictate what must be done in response. The idea of granting the WHO and its leadership such potentially fraught authorities is all the more problematic in light of their imperious, and actually malfeasant, conduct at the direction of the Chinese Communist Party in the course of the COVID-19 pandemic. But, with the active collusion of the Biden administration in what would amount to an unprecedented surrender of U.S. sovereignty, the approval of one or both of these agreements is likely – all other things being equal – to happen when the World Health Assembly meets in May 2023. The new WHO authorities would become provisionally binding on member states, irrespective of whether not they ultimately endorse them (i.e., in the case of the United States, through Senate ratification or other form of congressional approval). Especially troubling is the convergence of these initiatives with measures promoted by the WHO to institute global digital identity cards to document and monitor vaccination status and other medical conditions. When combined with the proliferating introduction of central bank digital currencies (CBDCs), these “smart” IDs would facilitate efforts to monitor, control and enforce the WHO’s diktats, and punish those who defy them. In remarks on Saturday, former President Donald Trump announced that, if reelected, he would once again direct the withdrawal of the United States from the World Health Organization – whose acronym he suggested would better be applied to “We Hide Outbreaks.” This CPDC webinar examines these and related topics – and the imperative need for the Congress to act, perhaps through the debate on Debt Ceiling relief, to extract the U.S. from the WHO. Moderator: - Frank Gaffney, executive chairman of the Center for Security Policy, host of Securing America with Frank Gaffney on Real America’s Voice Network, and vice-chair for the Committee on the Present Danger: China Taped Remarks: - Hon. Donald Trump, 45th President of the United States -- Highlights of Remarks at the Conservative Political Action Conference, March 4, 2023 Panelists: - Jonathan Emord, Esq. JD, Former Federal Communications Commission attorney; constitutional attorney and litigator; author, The Authoritarians: Their Assault on Individual Liberty, the Constitution, and Free Enterprise from the 19th Century to the Present; candidate for U.S. Senate from Virginia Topic: “Tyrannical Authoritarianism and the Effort to Put the WHO on Steroids” - Dr. Robert Malone, M.D., Leading medical practitioner opposed to the “China Model” response to the COVID-19 pandemic and all that flowed from it; freedom-fighter; inventor of the mRNA technology, author, Lies My Government Told Me and the Better Future Ahead Topic: “How the WHO Made the Pandemic Worse — and Will be Even More Dangerous if Rewarded for Doing So” - Dr. David Bell, Senior Scholar at Brownstone Institute, is a public health physician and biotech consultant in global health. He is a former medical officer and scientist at the World Health Organization (WHO), Programme Head for malaria and febrile diseases at the Foundation for Innovative New Diagnostics (FIND) in Geneva, Switzerland, and Director of Global Health Technologies at Intellectual Ventures Global Good Fund in Bellevue, WA, USA Topic: Amendments to the WHO's International Health Regulations: An Attempt to Implement an Existential Change in Sovereign Rights and International Relations - Reggie Littlejohn, Esq. JD, President of Women’s Rights Without Frontiers, Co-Chair of the Stop Vaccine Passports Task Force Topic: “The World Health Organization’s Power Grab and the Digital Gulag” - James Roguski, author, activist and essayist, Substack.com and StoptheWho.com Topic: “The imperative for America to Withdraw from the World Health Organization” - Hon. Michele Bachmann, Former Member of Congress; former presidential candidate; Dean, Robertson School of Government, Regent University Topic: “Why the United States must Withdraw from the WHO NOW!”

Hon. Michele Bachmann, Former Member of Congress; former presidential candidate; Dean, Robertson School of Government, Regent University Topic: “Why the United States must Withdraw from the WHO NOW!”

The War Room with Stephen K. Bannon, Episode 2560 Part 2 -- CPAC, March 2, 2023. TRANSCRIPT: Stephen K. Bannon: [00:00:03] Okay, you're back in the War Room. Natalie, hold up. We got a very special segment now. The indictment. Frank Gaffney, is this just more right-wing, over-the-top Xi Jinping? He's partners with all guys on Wall Street. He's partners with all the big corporations, with high tech, with everybody in Europe. He's bringing a peace deal to Ukraine. Why are you picking on the Chinese Communist [00:00:30] Party and the senior leadership? Frank Gaffney? Frank Gaffney: [00:00:33] I'm not picking on him. I'm trying to prevent him from destroying our country, which is what he has set out to do. Make no mistake about it. I'm with my colleague, Dede Laugesen, the Executive Secretary of our Present Danger: China. Stephen K. Bannon: [00:00:47] Hang on. What Frank Gaffney is saying, is that racist to go after the CCP? Member of the Audience: [00:00:54] Not at all. CCP is different. We are different from CCP. Chinese Lo Bai Jing [00:01:00] against CCP. Frank Gaffney: [00:01:02] Let's hear it for the Lo Bai Jing. Stephen K. Bannon: [00:01:04] Take down the CCP. Take down the CCP. Take down the CCP. Frank Gaffney: [00:01:11] Start by indicting them -- in the court of public opinion, if not in federal court. It is, as Steve likes to say, a transnational criminal organization. It has engaged in war crimes against our country [00:01:30] already. And crimes against humanity and against the Chinese people. Stephen K. Bannon: [00:01:37] The worst dictatorship in the world. But hang on. I'm interested in going after the CCP, but I'm as interested in going after the CCP's collaborators here in the United States of America. Are you going to do that? Do you have the stones to do that? Frank Gaffney: [00:01:51] The prosecution is of the CCP and its enablers in America and those are the guys [00:02:00] who are engaging in treason. You mentioned Wall Street. I say it every time I'm on this show. They're sending your money to fund their attacks on us. Stephen K. Bannon: [00:02:10] I want this audience to understand how it's their money that shifted the factories over to China. And it's their money that is financing the CCP. Here's the thing. The five families that run the five factions are the five wealthiest families on Earth. They make the Saudis look like peasants. Talk to me about how they're [00:02:30] using their money, their pension fund money and their tax money to fund themselves. Frank Gaffney: [00:02:35] This is the dirty little secret, folks. One element of that unrestricted warfare the Chinese Communist Party has engaged in against us for decades is the economic warfare piece. They've bought up people that Steve used to work with on Wall Street, and those guys take your money from pension funds and mutual funds and index funds and exchange [00:03:00] traded funds, and they send it to the People's Liberation Army's companies to wage war against us, not just the unrestricted kind. The shooting kind. Stephen K. Bannon: [00:03:09] It can't happen. That can't happen because you have Congress oversees this and the Biden regime oversees this. So it couldn't possibly happen. Frank Gaffney: [00:03:19] Well, that's why we need an indictment, folks. We saw the first hearing this week and those guys are talking about a lot of problems. But this is not the time to just admire the problem. It's [00:03:30] the time to prosecute the case. Stephen K. Bannon: [00:03:32] To prosecute the indictment. Where do they go, Frank? Where do they go to get the indictment? Frank Gaffney: [00:03:36] TheIndictmentBook.com is where we're starting right now. We're going to roll it out. Stephen K. Bannon: [00:03:42] We're going to have a huge announcement about The Indictment, the book, but right now you go to TheIndictmentBook.com. Frank Gaffney: [00:03:46] TheIndictmentBook.com, TheIndictmentBook.com. You can preorder it now and I encourage you to do so. Stephen K. Bannon: [00:03:54] Do we have an extra mic up there because Matt is... Matt Gaetz in the house. Matt [00:04:00] Gaetz. Just go up and grab a microphone. Hold it. Frank Gaffney, We're starting a new project to prosecute the Chinese Communist Party and their collaborators here in the United States. Is that something you agree with and is that something that you think you're prepared to back in Congress? Matt Gaetz: [00:04:16] Well, we had a China initiative when Donald Trump was president. And lo and behold, one of the first things that the Biden administration did when they took over the Department of Justice was to dissolve the special focused effort to go after people who are working [00:04:30] with the CCP. A matter of fact, I think Natalie Winters goes after the CCP a lot harder than the entirety of the Biden administration. Stephen K. Bannon: [00:04:36] Natalie Winters goes after the CCP harder than Congress!

Reggie Littlejohn’s presentation at a SVPTF webinar, Every Breath You Take: Big Brother’s Plan to Stalk You through the WHO, on Feb. 27, 2023 Reggie Littlejohn, President of Women’s Rights Without Frontiers, Co-Chair of the Stop Vaccine Passports Task Force. A graduate of Yale Law School, she is an expert on coercive population control and human rights in China and has testified nine times at the United States Congress. She equally focuses her efforts on stopping Chinese-style tyranny from spreading to the United States and worldwide through a totalitarian biotech surveillance state. Topic: How the WHO is poised to seize our personal medical freedom and national sovereignty, establishing a totalitarian bio-tech surveillance state, through its proposed Amendments to the International Health Regulations and new Pandemic Accord. TRANSCRIPT Reggie Littlejohn: [00:00:00] We are in the battle of our lives and we don't know it. We've been talking here about the digital gulag, about how social control and surveillance can combine with the central bank digital currency to trap us. But the thing is that this trap is coming down on us imminently, not in a matter of years, but in a matter of months, unless we do something about it. So specifically last [00:00:30] week, the World Health Organization, one of the working groups, was meeting all week long about international health regulations, amendments, and they will no doubt be coming out with a report on that to be voted on as early as this coming May. And this week as we speak, another working group is meeting in Geneva to finalize and move forward. The while, they call it a pandemic agreement or accord or instrument. [00:01:00] What it is, is it's a treaty. Both of these are treaties because they affect national sovereignty. But the W.H.O. refuses to call them a treaty because they don't want it to have to go through our treaty process. So both of these instruments could come up for an actual vote as early as this May. And they have they they have extreme dangers to our freedom. But what I just learned about on Friday through Dr. Francis Boyle, we pre-recorded [00:01:30] his his presentation at this webinar, so you'll be hearing more from him. But there is a third instrument that was secret, that was hidden that he discovered. And what it is, is it is the International Pandemic Preparedness Act that was that was buried in the National Defense Authorization Act. Reggie Littlejohn: [00:01:54] The National Defense Authorization Act passed and was signed into law by Biden in [00:02:00] December of 2022 is 1772 pages long. I wonder how many congressional representatives actually read through this thing. But on page 950 is the International Pandemic Preparedness Act. And according to Dr. Boyle, who is an expert on international treaties, there is a provision I don't have time to read you the whole thing, but the provision that he says can be used [00:02:30] to compel to say that all decisions of the World Health Organization are pre approved by the United States Congress. So whatever is passed with the amendments, whatever is passed by the pandemic accord, really a treaty that there are pre approved, it won't have to go through the Senate. I don't think this is constitutional. I don't think that you can just pass an act like this in the middle of the night under pressure that almost no one has read that that [00:03:00] subversive Senate treaty process. I'd like to file a lawsuit about that. But you know what? It doesn't matter whether it's unconstitutional. If you have globalists who are running the show who are going to ram it through anyway, and if you don't have the political will on the on the part of the people that's you and me to raise the awareness of this and to say this is unacceptable, it can't happen. So that's why we're here to to try to sound the alarm so people will take action. Reggie Littlejohn: [00:03:27] Now, I want to go through some of [00:03:30] the provisions that are most concerning in these in these two instruments, the international health regulations. Okay, let's start with that one. The proposed amendment, the word non binding, has been stricken in several places with the obvious intent that these would be binding in the past and the current set of regulations. It has to be an actual pandemic to for the World Health Organization to to intervene. Now [00:04:00] it has to be any any any potential public health risk. Also really important language restricting this. This language comes from the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. And it was stricken and it was the implementation of these regulations shall be with the full respect for the dignity, human rights and fundamental freedoms of persons. Why was that stricken? Now the zero draft of the new agreement. I'm just [00:04:30] going to call it a treaty because it's easier. But they don't call it a treaty because they want to subvert the treaty process again. Word went out that this is not anything really to worry about. It's not going to pass because it's a treaty. It's not called a treaty. They're not treating it as a treaty. It could pass. And there's a lot of problems with it. For example, global global surveillance. On page 24 of this treaty, it advises that the, quote, The parties shall the parties [00:05:00] commit to strengthen multisectoral coordinated, interoperable, integrated one health surveillance. So what would that look like to me? What it looks like. Reggie Littlejohn: [00:05:14] And the World Health Organization has already hired Deutsche Telekom to create international, interoperable, operable vaccine passports, which can give rise to the China social credit system to be used to surveil [00:05:30] us in every aspect of our lives. So if these are combined with a central bank, digital currency and they are connected to our credit cards and bank accounts, then if we do things like meeting a panelist in this webinar saying things that are counter-narrative, they could just cut us off from our credit cards and our and our bank accounts and we'll have no money. Another thing that's in this pandemic treaty accord, whatever is censorship [00:06:00] of dissenting views. It states that, quote, The party shall increase, commit to increase pandemic literacy in the population and tackle false, misleading, misinformation or disinformation. Each party is encouraged to conduct regular social listening. Does that sound like serving families or spying social listening and analysis to identify the prevalence and profiles of misinformation? I guess I would qualify as a profile in misinformation as well as some of the other people [00:06:30] here. But anyway, which contribute to design communications and messaging strategies for the public to counteract misinformation, disinformation and false news, thereby strengthening public trust. This is very strong language that that this new agreement, if it is passed, it's going to establish a worldwide disinformation governance board. Big Brother Absolutely surveilling you and stalking you through the W.H.O.. Another [00:07:00] part of it is the one health approach. I'm not going to I don't think I have time to read everything. Reggie Littlejohn: [00:07:06] Well, I'll just say here, the one health approach provides, quote, The parties will identify and integrate into relevant pandemic prevention and preparedness plans, interventions that address the drivers of the emergence and re-emergence of disease at the human animal environment interface, including but not limited to climate change, land use change, wildlife, trade, [00:07:30] desert desert, desertification and antimicrobial resistance. So what they're saying basically is this agreement will not just deal with human health, it'll deal with animal health, plant health, the environment. Basically, the World Health Organization is saying that they can intervene in any aspect of life on earth. And another aspect of this is that the language that requires the agreement [00:08:00] of the country. Has been stricken. So the World Health Organization could decide if we have something going on in the United States, They could decide, well, we're just going to intervene even if we don't want them to. This is what we're talking about in terms of the loss of national sovereignty and the loss of personal sovereignty. Because if this happens, then. Tedros Ghebreyesus, the director general of the World Health Organization, will have the power to say how we're going to handle the pandemic and we're going to have to follow it. [00:08:30] So he could say we need to have forced vaccines, forced detentions, anything he wants. So the time to act is now. We have to counter this because once these things are passed, it's going to be too late. Thank you.

Dr. Michael Yeadon’s presentation at a SVPTF webinar, Every Breath You Take: Big Brother’s Plan to Stalk You through the WHO, on Feb. 27, 2023 Dr. Michael Yeadon, PhD, former Vice-President and Chief Scientific Officer for Allergic and Respiratory Diseases worldwide for the drug company, Pfizer. He is the co-founder and former CEO of the biotech company Ziarco. Topic: Are the MRNA injections toxic by mistake or by design? Why is the WHO pressing them on the world? TRANSCRIPT Dr. Michael Yeadon: [00:00:00] I can hardly describe to the audience how frustrated and angry as well as worried I feel. So I'm a career scientist, as Frank said. It's been obvious to me since about April 2020. That what was going on, these cells, which hadn't yet fully understand, had as its logical endpoint totalitarian control of of everyone [00:00:30] on the planet using digital techniques. And I'm afraid I believed then. And I believe even more firmly now that it's not just Big Brother in control that we face, it's extinction. And I'm going to describe why I am so sure about that. I'm getting up to three figures of interviews I've given, and it's immensely frustrating because as I gather [00:01:00] knowledge, I grow more and more certain of some of the things I'm going to tell you. And they ought to be such that a reasonable person, having heard them, you either got to decide that despite my years of experience and the fact that I've gained nothing from speaking out, I'm either mad or what I'm telling you is pretty, right? Pretty well, right. It's the latter. Obviously. I don't think I've gone crazy and I've received not a penny of compensation. [00:01:30] I haven't thought it nor accepted anything, so I'll cut to the chase then. So before we get into the vaccines, it's actually really rather important to go back to the big picture. I've got a rhetorical question for you. How many times what's the right number of times would you think it appropriate for the public health people in your country and the leading politicians in your country to get on the TV and lie to you in your face? [00:02:00] What's the right number of times if it's in relation to health matters that could affect your health, your family's health, or your life? How many times? The answer is zero, isn't it? Am I make mistakes? But if they deliberately tell you things that they know are not true and can affect your health and life, I think you should disregard everything they say thereafter. Dr. Michael Yeadon: [00:02:22] What I'm going to tell you is the authorities in every country have said I've done nothing but [00:02:30] lie to your face since the beginning of 2020 in relation to this alleged pandemic. So they told us, for example, that the threat to the population's health was very severe, and it was on that basis that you were going to have to do all sorts of ridiculous things like locking down and getting mass tested. Well, as the reality has come out a few months ago and check the data, the lethality of this alleged virus is about the same [00:03:00] as influenza. So straight away the entire. Apparatus falls away at the first question, which is are we under a severe threat? The answer is no. They knew we weren't under a severe threat. Right. Dr. Michael Yeadon: [00:03:18] I could spend hours talking about this, but they lied about population health threats, severity. They knew it wasn't severe and they persisted in pretending it was. But the data well accepted now [00:03:30] is that it wasn't. And then they insisted on a whole panoply of medical countermeasures, really non-pharmaceutical interventions. So they made you wear masks? I knew long before COVID that masks are splash guards. They don't filter your air. They cannot possibly filter alleged viruses in your breath. They're splash guards. Look at the way the air goes around the side. That's a second line, isn't it? Don't really believe that these masks filter little infective [00:04:00] organisms in your breath. I hope you don't. It's ludicrous. Filthy thing across your face all day. They lied and said that when ill people turn up at hospital, if they have COVID selectively, if they have COVID, we're not going to treat them. No early treatments are possible. No treatments are allowed. And they made them go home until they were blue, literally. And then when they came back, they reflexively murdered in hospital. That's another lie. They made you lockdown or unless you're an essential worker. [00:04:30] And then you could go backwards and forwards and serve them, making sandwiches or packing food in food plants. And you may have all the loads of places serving in supermarkets. Did you know that the amount of illness in food packing plants and in supermarkets was not any greater than anywhere else in the community? What that tells you is and that was fairly obvious and you know, when I was telling you this, it's true. Dr. Michael Yeadon: [00:04:59] What that tells [00:05:00] you is the whole idea of lockdowns was just to separate you. It made no difference whatsoever for the spread of this alleged viral pathogen. We we knew that beforehand. It was proven in numerous peer reviewed journal articles by the summer of 2020. And yet, goddamn it, they locked us down again. Christmas 2020. So I've just proved to you that your authorities lied in your face repeatedly, and they're still lying in your face. [00:05:30] This whole thing is a multi year plan designed to accomplish what it's accomplishing, which is to smash civil society, to wreck the economy, and to introduce digital various digital controls, not least of which is that war criminal Tony Blair's repeated call for digital ID and as other people on this call will point out, if you've got a digital ID [00:06:00] that you have to present before you enter or leave a premises, remember, every permit could be regulated in that way easily just by putting a camera and a lock on it, including your front door. Don't think they're going to allow you to move freely around and stop you getting on planes. They could stop you moving into a shop, out of a shop, or even out of your own house. Dr. Michael Yeadon: [00:06:22] It's just limited by cameras and electronic locks on the door. It's that easy. And so you [00:06:30] don't need a digital ID. You've lived a whole life without a digital ID. Your life is not your safety does not require it whatsoever. So if I achieve nothing else by this, call this conversation. When they say, Oh, you've got to register if you're digital, I must say, no, I'm going to say no even if I am thereby financially excluded. If you if you accept this, you are in the first stages of the same funnel that cattle go [00:07:00] down or at the end they're in the crush cage waiting the stun bullet. That's this is the beginning of it. So please say no, because there's no escape from the totalitarian control that digital ID regulates. Your access to. Every space into every transaction will will grant whoever owns the database and controls the algorithm controls you. They will abolish cash, introduce central bank [00:07:30] digital currencies as readily described, and you will not be able to transact at all. So I think I've persuaded you that they lied about the the pandemic. I personally don't think was any pandemic at all. And had they not had the panoply of mass testing and the terror of 24/7 network TV, I don't think anyone would have noticed anything. The people who were ill were suffering from the normal illnesses, amplified [00:08:00] tremendously by the stress and fear that was being pumped out of their televisions. Dr. Michael Yeadon: [00:08:05] Fear is one of the biggest inhibitors of human immune system. It makes you ill. And that's what they did. They lied to you. And what all that happened is they amplified all the normal illnesses and then they treated people badly, effectively murdering them. But here's the worst part. Now, they had us believing that there was this pathogen floating around and you had to be vaccinated. [00:08:30] Well, let me just point out a couple of little fact. Lits vaccination could never have been a successful or appropriate response to a respiratory viral pathogen. And it's not going to be the next time because there's going to be a next time you're going to do this again. That's why I'm speaking, right? I mean, everything's happening like I just retired to my shed. They're going to do this again. The reason that these vaccines could not work is, again today injected them into you [00:09:00] and they create immune response if they work in your blood compartment. But the pathogen has gone in your nose and lungs. It's in a different part of your body. And they do not meet. The immune reaction from the injected vaccine plays no role whatsoever in protecting you from infection from an airborne pathogen. So I knew that they knew that all the players who've been lying to you knew what I just told you could not work. Dr. Michael Yeadon: [00:09:28] Flu vaccines, I'm afraid, don't [00:09:30] work really either for the same reason. And they've lied and sold them into your communities for decades. I didn't know that until the last three years. But they don't work. They could never have worked. Early treatment would have been the right thing to do, and it would all have been over. Then, of course, we've got the magic warp speed development. I mean, do you really think they managed to develop in parallel all the things they would have normally taken seven, ten, [00:10:00] 12 years to do and they managed to do it in less than a year. No, they didn't. It's literally impossible for them to have done. And I knew that I'd be pretty terrified in the middle of 2020 when I finally idly had a look at what they're actually doing. And I'm going to talk to you about about that. So and I as soon as I realized what they were doing, I knew they were going to coerce it into everyone, even though they said, oh, we'll give it to the vulnerable, the elders. So I have been made infamous by this phrase I'm going to give you. I'm [00:10:30] off. Aren't these vaccines that we know of harms people? Were they toxic by accident? Or, as I put it, toxic by design. Now, I've spent I spent 32 years in biopharma research. Dr. Michael Yeadon: [00:10:45] I was a VP in Pfizer, head of worldwide research for respiratory. Ten years in biotech. And I ran my own biotech, which we sold to Novartis, which was then the biggest drug company in the world. So I'm not stupid. [00:11:00] I know what I'm doing. So when I tell you that having spent all those years in R&D, we worked on something called rational drug design, when you're trying to bring about effects, you don't just randomly gather a handful of nuts and bolts, as it were, from the molecular toolkit and hope they work. You're actually trying to ask, Where do I want the medicine to be? How long should it last? Should it go everywhere? What kind of concentrations do I want in order to bring about an effect and to do so safely? [00:11:30] So when I looked at the design of these so-called vaccines, I found at least three things that I can describe quickly to you, that if you accept what I tell you, you can no longer believe that these are toxic accidentally. That is, they were designed to injure, to maim and to kill. And the only reason they've only killed about ten or 12 million people so far is because their manufacturing is terrible. And [00:12:00] but if they did it again, if you inject it, say, ten more times, I think they'd probably do it. And that is exactly what they have planned. Dr. Michael Yeadon: [00:12:08] So the three items you should look at when you're trying to make a vaccine like this. You have to choose which bits of the alleged pathogen you're going to pick to put into your vaccine. Now, I would suggest to you you'd pick a bit that was different from you and that was not harmful. So you might pick a bit of, I don't know, [00:12:30] a bit of the virus that doesn't seem to do anything to you. It might be important to the virus. Didn't do anything to, you know, which bits did they pick? The spike protein, the bits on the outside. That's the bit that actually was known beforehand to be biologically really violently active, stimulating blood clotting and neurological problems and other things. All four drug companies picked spike protein. So there you go. Straightaway. I knew this was this [00:13:00] was not an accident. Somebody was trying to harm people. The next thing, in order to convert this theoretical drug in your test tube into something like a medicine that you can administer, you have to formulate it and formulations to make a spray, a tablet, a cream. An injection requires you to mix it with something else, and you have to choose what to do in order to make it stable and to protect it and so on. When I looked at what they were doing, they've covered it in lipid nanoparticles. [00:13:30] That's the both mRNA vaccines and lipid nanoparticles. Dr. Michael Yeadon: [00:13:35] They're effectively covering it with facts. Your body has a violent dislike for genetic information. That's how you preserve that most precious thing, your own genetic heritage. So it's a pretty good thing and not surprising. Your cells are really good at rejecting foreign genetic information, not letting it in. But if you cover it, in fact, same sort of stuff, your cells are made of, it glides right through the cell wall, goes everywhere in your body. [00:14:00] So they they told us when they injected it in your shoulder, I would just say they're going to limp system. No, I mean, obviously, I knew it was going to be all around the body. It's exactly what it does do and it's what it's designed to do. It's designed to do that. I found a paper ten years old and well known to people in formulation, research and development, these kind of formulations, which were designed for medicines that were thought maybe [00:14:30] to tackle the most serious cancers. So the mRNA technologies, when I was in Pfizer, we were thinking of them as treatment for really serious cancers, and they just happened to have this feature where they concentrate in certain internal organs the spleen, the liver and the ovaries. So yeah, ovaries. So when you inject it with this material, ladies and girls, I'm confident that what has happened is these materials have concentrated in your ovaries. Dr. Michael Yeadon: [00:14:59] And [00:15:00] the third part is the mRNA technology itself, completely unsuitable for an all comer medicine. And it's for this reason, it's really easy. Your immune system is designed to attack things against your body that aren't you. Put in another way anything that's non self. Your immune system is really good at spotting that it's non-self and if it spots it, it will throw in all the troops. It's got cellular, chemical [00:15:30] and attack that entity to drive it out because it knows you've been invaded. What happens when you get injected with an mRNA that codes for a foreign protein, a spike protein from a virus, a non cell protein that every cell that gets that stuff, which I have said is formulated in such a way as to go all around your body, including concentrating your ovaries. In that point, it starts to make this non-self protein. Your immune system goes, Hello, I've got something [00:16:00] inside me that shouldn't be here and your immune system attacks your own body. That's one of the most fundamental problems with this technology. And any vaccine that they tell you is made using this new shiny technology, do not allow them to inject your children with it. Now, they are currently reformatting all existing vaccines in the mRNA format, and that's why Pfizer and Moderna are opening factories all [00:16:30] around the world and governments around the world, including mine in the UK and New York in the US, has agreed business terms to acquire enough injections to inject every citizen in your country man, woman, child and baby ten times over. Dr. Michael Yeadon: [00:16:46] With materials like this, which I have explained to you, are designed to go everywhere in your body and to bring about an auto immune attack on your own body. So if you felt you had some side effects with some of these [00:17:00] injections, which I didn't take, of course, because I could see they were going to be dangerous. But if you had some side effects or, you know, anyone else had some side effects. Now multiply it by ten times because I'm going to finish now. I think the combination of digital ID, which will become your I think it'll become your one health digital passport. Why not? It's got all your details on it, date of birth, who you are, where you've been and your vaccine status and your health status. [00:17:30] So if the W.H.O. says we're going to have a one health passport, that means, oh, you've all got to have all of the injections. If you don't have it, your digital I.D. becomes invalid and you can't enter or leave any regulative premise. And like I said, everywhere can be regulated if they want it to be. So that's the fight in front of us. And the way we stop this is by recovering the power of, No, I'm not doing this. Dr. Michael Yeadon: [00:17:56] And if enough of us say we're not doing it, they can't [00:18:00] win. They'll only win if they persuade us. Almost like farm animals, like, you know, just to simply go along with what everyone else is doing. So I've given the last three years of my life to warn people this is what's coming. But I can't save you. Only you can do it. Anyone you know in your network that you think should hear this message, you must tell them I can never reach them. They're not on this call. [00:18:30] And the mainstream media are never going to tell them the truth. It's down to you. If you don't do it, we will lose. Okay, so I'm going to stop. At this point, we've been lied to. I don't think there's been a pandemic. I don't think respiratory, serious respiratory illness, pandemics are even possible. And vaccines would never have been an appropriate response, even if they'd been responsibly developed, which they have not been. And these specific ones is mRNA have been designed in such a way as to injure, [00:19:00] maim and kill, and they're coming at you with more of them. So you decide if you're going to believe CNN or if you're going to believe this. This guy who's given all his time, having been in the industry all his professional life, given what I've explained to you. So I suppose pause at this point.

Francis Boyle’s presentation at a SVPTF webinar, Every Breath You Take: Big Brother’s Plan to Stalk You through the WHO, on Feb. 27, 2023 Francis Boyle, PhD, professor of international law at the University of Illinois College of Law. He received his JD degree magna cum laude from Harvard Law School, and a PhD in Political Science from Harvard University. Professor Boyle served on the Board of Directors of Amnesty International. He drafted the U.S. domestic implementing legislation for the Biological Weapons Convention, known as the Biological Weapons Anti-Terrorism Act of 1989, that was approved unanimously by both Houses of the U.S. Congress and signed into law by President George H.W. Bush. Topic: The WHO’s Plan to Be a Global Dictator, to Nullify National Sovereignty through the new Treaty and Amendments to the International Health Regulations, and to Create Emergencies to Enslave Humanity. TRANSCRIPT Francis Boyle: [00:00:00] Before I continue, let me point out my qualifications here. In 1985, I called for and then drafted the United States domestic implementing legislation for the Biological Weapons Convention known as the Biological Weapons Anti-Terrorism Act of 1989 That was passed unanimously by both houses of the United States Congress and signed into law by [00:00:30] President George Bush Senior with the approval of the United States Department of Justice. Now, I'm not going to go through the long history of the pandemic here. I have a book Resisting medical Tyranny that you could read in. But right now, I want to do deal with the latest iteration of this crisis, namely what is happening now. Is an attempt to take over [00:01:00] the United States of America by using the World Health Organization as a front organization for that purpose. This is being backed by the Center for Disease Control. Bill Gates. The Chinese Communist dictatorship. Big Pharma and the bio warfare industry. There has been so much opposition to the [00:01:30] diktats coming out of Washington, DC over the handling of the pandemic that these elites have decided to go to the W.H.O. and Blue, wash it through the W.H.O. and use the W.H.O. as a front organization to accomplish its objectives. There are three different complicated legal documents involved here, all of which I've read [00:02:00] and analyzed. The first, a proposed W.H.O. treaty that would set up a brand new international organization with powers to issue orders, legally binding orders, all the way down from this new organization to your primary care physician. Francis Boyle: [00:02:23] They will be issuing orders to your doctors how to mistreat you. And [00:02:30] as you've seen in the pandemic, this will not be in your best interest at all. The treaty has been deliberately drafted for the purpose of circumventing and undermining and contravening the power of the Senate. The US Senate, to give its advice and consent to the treaty. It will automatically come into effect immediately upon its signature. [00:03:00] I've studied international organizations and treaties going back to the First Hague Peace Conference of 1899. I know of no such treaty in existence today that would do this. So immediately come into effect and you will have a medical global police state issuing orders all the way down here in the United States, contravening [00:03:30] state, local health authorities, your governor, your local attorney general, your local surgeon general, and contravening all your democratically elected officials to accomplish this this objective. The second document are amendments to the International Health Regulations of 2005. They will accomplish the exact same thing [00:04:00] by another means and will give this totalitarian dictatorial powers to Dr. Tedros. Let me repeat that Dr. Tedros, whom we know works in cahoots with the Chinese communist government, that is in part behind this with Bill Gates, Big Pharma, the bio warfare industry, and our own Center for Disease Control, Tony Fauci, is involved. Francis Boyle: [00:04:29] President [00:04:30] Trump correctly pulled the United States of America out of the W.H.O., but there had to be six months notice. Biden was elected. He rescinded the pullout and appointed Tony Fauci as the US representative on the executive committee of the W.H.O.. If you have any doubts about the criminality of Tony Fauci, I would encourage you to read Bobby Kennedy Jr. S [00:05:00] book on The real Tony Fauci. This man's a criminal. He should be put in jail. But that is what is going to happen under these regulations. They will accomplish the same thing as the treaty only by a different US constitutional mechanism. It will not require the advice and consent of two thirds of the Senate. As you [00:05:30] know, Senator Johnson recently introduced legislation in the Senate saying that any treaty should receive the advice and consent of the Senate. That's not going to do the trick. With all due respect to Senator Johnson and his colleagues, if you read these documents, that will not do the trick. What is only going to do the trick here is the recent. Translation introduced by Congressman Biggs to [00:06:00] immediately terminate US membership in the WTO, immediately to cut off all funding for the WTO and to terminate the W.H.O. Act here in the United States of America. Now, the third document is even more pernicious, insidious and nefarious, and that was sneaked through the Congress at the last [00:06:30] minute that under the control of the Biden administration, the Democrats in the National Defense Authorization Act, which is quite extensive. Francis Boyle: [00:06:41] But if you go through the National Defense Authorization Act, you will find something called the Global Pandemic Prevention and Biosecurity Act of 2022, which I read. It was just enacted, just sneaked through. [00:07:00] What this does is that it is a congressional statute that paves the way for the amendments to the international health regulations and for this treaty so that in advance, the United States Congress has already given its authorization to both the health regulations and the treaty. The health regulations will come up [00:07:30] for sure in May of 2023. The treaty is projected to come up in 2024, but my reading of the treaty is that it could be ready to go. Also, at the meeting of the World Health Assembly in 2023, they will get two bites of the apple. Either they will get the amendment S or they will get the treaty or they will get both. [00:08:00] And both of them have already been approved by the Global Pandemic Prevention and Biosecurity Act of 2022. Just snuck through Congress in the dead of night. No one bothers to read the National Defense Authorization Act. I did. I tracked down this section, but that was it. That's my job. Okay. And so a trap has been set for us, for the American people, for the American Constitution. Francis Boyle: [00:08:29] This [00:08:30] is a coup d'etat against our Constitution, against the 10th Amendment, against the sixth, against the ability of Congress to give advice and consent. So, again, the only alternative we have here now and I'm just speaking as as a fellow American citizen and a longtime lawyer, the only alternative we have is the United States government must pull out [00:09:00] immediately from the World Health Organization before these two documents come up in in May and must terminate all funding immediately. The W.H.O. right now is using funding money that we can we are giving it today to end our republic, to end our democracy and to justify the lives, health, safety [00:09:30] and well-being of all American citizens. And that is precisely why I am appearing here today at this conference to alert you all. My advice right now is that everyone mobilizes behind this legislation by Congressman Biggs. It's exactly what we not want now. And by the way, the Republicans are now in control of the House. Under the Constitution, [00:10:00] they control the budget. They can pretty much do what they want to do. And you had better contact Speaker of the House McCarthy and tell him he better get on this immediately and stop this before May. Otherwise, we are all going to be living under a World Health Organization medical dictatorship under the control of Dr. Tedros, Bill Gates, [00:10:30] the Chinese communist dictatorship, the CDC and Tony Fauci. Thank you.

Dr. David Bell’s presentation at a SVPTF webinar, Every Breath You Take: Big Brother’s Plan to Stalk You through the WHO, on Feb. 27, 2023 Dr. David Bell, Senior Scholar at Brownstone Institute, is a public health physician and biotech consultant in global health. He is a former medical officer and scientist at the World Health Organization (WHO), Programme Head for malaria and febrile diseases at the Foundation for Innovative New Diagnostics (FIND) in Geneva, Switzerland, and Director of Global Health Technologies at Intellectual Ventures Global Good Fund in Bellevue, WA, USA. Topic: Amendments to the WHO’s International Health Regulations: An Attempt to Implement an Existential Change in Sovereign Rights and International Relations. THANSCRIPT Dr. David Bell: [00:00:00] People need to understand the background for what is going on and the current amendments to international health regulations, the treaty as it is called, or instrument that is going alongside that the WTO developing, are the result of a few decades of big changes in the global health. So the World Health Organisation was set up originally after the Second World War as a country based organization. There is a lot of emphasis on decolonization and removal [00:00:30] of central authority, an emphasis on communities coming out of the colonialist eras of the 1930s and fascism, etc. And the WTO was one of many organizations that was set up to try to stop that happening again. So that ran pretty much in that way for a long time. It was almost solely funded by countries. Countries have a say in what happens. This has changed over the last couple of decades in two ways. One, the there's been an increase in private funding, corporate and [00:01:00] private individuals. And these have now become one of the biggest funders of W.H.O.. And secondly, the funding is very much directed. So rather than core funding, the funders decide what their funding will be used for. So essentially what they will do so that this is it's fair to movement from disease, burden based emphasis of the World Health Organization to an emphasis on profit. So there are two instruments here the international health regulations and this court, the treaty [00:01:30] or that is the C plus, and it's recently retracted. Dr. David Bell: [00:01:34] And they do slightly different things, but they complement each other. So the international health regulations have been around for 20 years. They have also been under international law, but they are considered to be recommendations of the W.H.O.. And what the amendments will do in their current form, and it will go through a few more committee meetings before May this year when they voted on both countries. These [00:02:00] amendments greatly expand the definition of health emergencies, including a sort of one health definition, which includes anything that could potentially impact well-being or health. And it includes potential threats rather than real threats. And as a bureaucracy, a bureaucracy of surveillance has been set up. We will find many potential threats. The DG, the director general of HR, an individual, will have sole power to declare an emergency and to stop an emergency [00:02:30] later. And the other important thing is that the amendments in their current form change recommendation to be binding. So when countries sign this, if the wording is not changed, they will be signing up to a binding agreement to do what the W.H.O. does in any health threat. Another important aspect of this is the way it addresses human rights and the original language of the international health regulations from 20 years ago or so. Includes very similar language [00:03:00] to the Universal Declaration of Human Rights after the Second World War. Dr. David Bell: [00:03:03] This is being changed to equity coherence and inclusivity, which are really meaningless terms. And importantly, it also is basing these on the social and economic context. So this is taking the whole basis of individual sovereignty, sovereignty and all people equal. And turning this into all people are not equal, but someone who decides, based on the economic and social assessment of that person, will decide [00:03:30] what rights they have. And these rights are very, very powerful. The international health regulations at the moment include recommendations from the W.H.O. and the DG to do things like closing borders, forced quarantine, confinement of individuals, forced medical examinations, requiring injection, etc. But in changing these from recommendations to a binding agreement, what [00:04:00] this means is that W.H.O. can tell a person in United States or Malawi or Vietnam to be injected with a vaccine, for instance, or to have a medical examination or to be confined at home. And rather than having someone given in the country to do this or in the local community assessing public health risks, this is someone in a completely different part of the world giving broad. Orders on how people should be treated. So this is [00:04:30] completely undoing the whole idea of individual sovereignty and community based care that was based on. So the treaty mechanism, which will be voted on next year and this is what the I and B Committee is looking at is in some ways a softer in the wording because it seems to assume that the amendments to the IRA will get through. Dr. David Bell: [00:04:52] So the treaty essentially provides money. It talks about 5% at least of. Health of health budgets going to emergencies. [00:05:00] It sets up a mechanism for supply the WTO will control and a global governing board for the treaty and for this whole pandemic or emergency preparedness agenda which will be within WTO. It appears so it's really putting the bureaucracy there to support the changes, quite egregious changes that are proposed in the international health regulations. So we need to stop both of these. They are both a vast overreach [00:05:30] in terms of public health, as we've seen from COVID and the COVID response, which these are planning to, you know, very clearly will replicate and intensify. They are bad for public health. They impoverish people. There's a vast increase in other infectious diseases, in malnutrition, etc., directly as a result of what has been done. And it was all predictable. So and what the concentration of this has been in very much to the very people who are promoting this agenda and who have been increasingly [00:06:00] funding W.H.O., it's really it's using taxpayer's money to concentrate wealth, to impoverish the majority, to reduce health and to concentrate the wealth in the hands of these sponsors. Dr. David Bell: [00:06:13] I think we do need some sort of international health mechanism. We need coordination between countries. We need a network that will support countries when they need it and when they ask for it and when communities ask for it. But this is going very much in the opposite direction. This is a danger to health, [00:06:30] is a danger to the individual sovereignty and national sovereignty. It's also it's just unravelling the whole decolonization and the strength of the human rights agenda that we've developed over really 100 years. So how do we combat this? Firstly, we need people to understand what is there, and we need the general public to understand and we need legislators to understand. And not just in the United States. We need this globally. This affects all countries and what [00:07:00] it is. When we damage other countries, we damage humanity, but we also damage the United States. So this is a fundamentally different approach to human rights. People need to understand that. They need to understand that this is unravelling what was fought for in the Second World War, in other wars in this country, the fight against slavery, the fight against discrimination, etc. This is unravelling the whole concepts that drove those. So people need to understand this. They need to put pressure on legislators, and legislators [00:07:30] need to stop this from happening. Dr. David Bell: [00:07:32] There's different ways of doing that. But non-compliance, once it's in place is going to be very difficult. So the W.H.O. even needs to know that this is completely unacceptable. And the countries that are pushing this and the people that are pushing this need to know that completely unacceptable. It has to be completely withdrawn or we need to start paying attention to these institutions that are doing this, including the W.H.O., etc.. So that could mean in the end, the W.H.O. needs funding [00:08:00] from countries. It doesn't make sense to fund something that is a net harm. In that case, we would need to completely replace it with an organization that is completely different, that doesn't have conflicts of interest, that responds to people and not for profit. There are different ways that legislators can deal with this, but they need to feel the pressure from the people to stop this. We really need to stop the governments from going through that. They very likely will, at least in a different form than now, because nobody needs a 50% vote. The second part [00:08:30] needs a two thirds vote of the World Health Organization because it's a new treaty. But in either case, if they do go through, they need to be completely undone. And this and other countries need to make it very clear that they're not going to comply with any of the provisions.

Reggie Littlejohn’s presentation at a SVPTF webinar, Every Breath You Take: Big Brother’s Plan to Stalk You through the WHO, on Feb. 27, 2023 Reggie Littlejohn, President of Women’s Rights Without Frontiers, Co-Chair of the Stop Vaccine Passports Task Force. A graduate of Yale Law School, she is an expert on coercive population control and human rights in China and has testified nine times at the United States Congress. She equally focuses her efforts on stopping Chinese-style tyranny from spreading to the United States and worldwide through a totalitarian biotech surveillance state. TRANSCRIPT Reggie Littlejohn: [00:00:00] Our Constitution and the Nuremberg Code have already been abrogated by these vaccine mandates, etc., the lockdowns, etc.. So this is the situation and I discussed this with Dr. Francis Boyle offline. It's basically a situation where. Our constitutional rights are being shattered. But they're just going to continue to be shattered because the people who are in charge are globalists and [00:00:30] they have managed to terrorize the population to the extent that people are not willing to fight back. So they're just doing it because they can. And what what this is about, in my opinion, is. You've got the World Economic Forum, you've got the globalists, you've got the great reset coming down through and the United Nations coming down through the World Health Organization, using health as a means to achieve their two ends, which are the population, as Dr. Yeadon had [00:01:00] mentioned. And then the other one is globalist control via these vaccine passports, digital IDs combined with the central bank digital currency, the ultimate result of which is it going to be a much lower population of the world and that those who are left are going to be under their under complete control of the globalists? That's that's how I see it.

Trevor Loudon’s presentation at a SVPTF webinar, Every Breath You Take: Big Brother’s Plan to Stalk You through the WHO, on Feb. 27, 2023 Trevor Loudon, author and filmmaker, “The Enemies Within” and “The Enemies Within the Church”; contributor, Epoch Times. Topic: China’s Outsize Influence at the WHO; The WHO’s Pandemic Response and the China Model. TRANSCRIPT Trevor Loudon: [00:00:00] As you've spoken about, Comrade Tedros, basically the Tigray Liberation Front for the Tigray Marxist-Leninist Party, he came out of the Maoist student movement of the 1970s, very much in bed with China. China did a lot of Belt and road developments and Ethiopia and got very, very friendly with Mr. Tedros and they basically appointed him as the head of the World Health Organization, though he's not even [00:00:30] a medical doctor. He's not quite sure what he is, actually. But he's a politician. He's an academic and a marxist Leninist guerrilla. So that's the man at the top of the pile. But I think very, very a very sinister development was revealed a couple of months ago. They the World Health Organization and World Health Organization announced the appointment of a woman called Susan Michie to the head of the Behavioral Behavioral [00:01:00] Modification Unit of the World Health Organization. So she will be in charge of enforcing lockdowns, using psychology, using a little bit of carrot, a little bit of stick, whatever is necessary to get buy in to any future mandates, any future vaccination programs, anything the World Health Organization comes up against. Susan Michie is a big friend of communist China. She [00:01:30] has done smoking cessation problems programs for the Chinese government, so they have used to expertise to do mass programs in China. She's also attended several conferences of psychological conferences run by the Communist Party of Cuba. Now. She is a long standing member of the Communist Party of Britain, which supports [00:02:00] China completely these days. It's a so as part of the you know, the all the all these hundred 230 so world communist parties that look to China for their leadership. Trevor Loudon: [00:02:12] Susan McCarthy was. Part of the SAGE group. Will is part of the Sage group, the the advisory Group on emergencies that advised Boris Johnson's Conservative government on lockdown policy. And [00:02:30] she was known as a mask Nazi. She was known as, you know, we're going to have to wear masks forever. We're going to have lockdowns, the harshest possible lockdowns. She was an extremist on that, which is not surprising given her background. The British Communist Party, which has said she is part of. I've done documentaries about this. They actually use the unions that they have under their control, the teachers unions, [00:03:00] transport unions, etc., to lobby for the harshest possible lockdowns they had set up at the Morning Star. The British Communist Party newspaper set up the zero COVID group, which was about their philosophy, was we got to go for zero COVID. So it's masks, it's mandates, it's lockdowns, it's everything. This was all driven by the British Communist Party. Now it's, in my view, [00:03:30] to basically extend the lockdowns as harshly as possible, to do the maximum possible possible damage to British capitalism. Now, Susan McKee. It's not just an ordinary communist. She is communist royalty. Her father, I think, said Donald Michie, was a very famous mathematician and computer scientist. He made a lot of amazing discoveries and whatever. But he used to work in Bletchley [00:04:00] Park during World War Two. This was the super secret British, British Codebreaking establishment that broke the Nazi codes during World War Two and played a major role in Britain and the United States defeating Nazi Germany. Trevor Loudon: [00:04:19] Now, that was a big target of Soviet Soviet interest, and he was a Communist Party member working in that institution. Susan, [00:04:30] as a young woman, was brought up as a red diaper baby. Her parents were going to the Soviet Union on a regular basis to shake up Czechoslovakia and Poland and Hungary on a regular basis. Susan, as a young woman, was were known as a tanky. Now, tanky is a is a term of derision on the left. You know, you have your ordinary garden variety communists, and they believe in, you know, pretty harsh measures. [00:05:00] But a tanky is the worst of the worst. You know, it's a reference to the use of tanks by the Red Army and the suppression of the Prague Spring and Czechoslovakia. The tanks came in and shut down, shut down the the people trying to get a bit more freedom. And so that split the British Communist Party. The moderates didn't really like the tanks, but the hardcore pro Soviet just lock them down [00:05:30] just with they love the tanks good On the Soviet Union. That's exactly what has to happen. They are the tanks and she is a tank now. So she's in there now. And this is my this is what I would say. This is what I've found in my research around the world. The areas, the countries that had the harshest lockdowns. Tended to be the ones with the most Chinese influence. [00:06:00] Now, if you look at America, you will look at the states of California and Oregon and Hawaii. Very harsh lockdowns. Trevor Loudon: [00:06:08] Lots and lots of Chinese influence. The same in Massachusetts, very deep Chinese influence there, the same in New York, the same in Chicago, parts of North Carolina. This is a pattern of found. Sweden and Europe had some of the lightest lockdowns and they have, I believe, some of the least [00:06:30] Chinese influence. The Chinese obviously have control over a lot of politicians in every Western country, every third world country. But most importantly, they control the labor unions. Every major country in the world's unions are now controlled by communists, including the United States. And they all answer to the CPC, the CPP, the Communist Party of China and Australia. Victoria and Australia was notorious [00:07:00] for its the length of its lockdowns and the harshness of its enforcement. Victoria is the California of Australia. Melbourne is the city is the San Fran is the San Francisco of Australia. It's the Communist centre of Australia. It's a it's a home to both the Communist, the Australian Communist Party of Australia and the explicitly pro-Chinese Communist Party of Australia, Marxist, Leninist. Their [00:07:30] unions are completely controlled. They're premier of Melbourne, a socialist left Labor premier, actually brought the Chinese Belt and Road into Victoria against the wishes of his own Prime Minister, the only state in Australia to sign up to the Belt and Road. And they had the harshest lockdowns and I think you'll find this pattern repeating all over the world. So the Chinese gave us the virus [00:08:00] and there's still a debate whether that was deliberate or accidental. But we know that once it was out there, it was deliberately foisted on the West. Trevor Loudon: [00:08:09] The Chinese banned internal internal travel in China. They encouraged it to the West. So they gave us the vaccine, They infected us and they drove. They used their communist unions and their subservient politicians to drive the lockdowns as hard [00:08:30] as they possibly could and push for mass vaccination as much as they possibly could. So the Chinese both gave us the virus and managed the response. Now they have our position with Susan Mackie as the head of their behavioural unit, an expert in and psychological manipulation. Clearly, she has been put in position for the next for the next pandemic [00:09:00] and as a tanky as a member of the British Communist Party, as a mask, Nazi, as a lockdown Nazi, as a as a supporter of the zero COVID policy. You can imagine what kind of strategies she will be employing if she is given the opportunity. And it's the only way out of this. As others have said as no, we've got to put a lot of pressure on the US government right now to [00:09:30] in some way get out of this agreement. At least we've got to keep the United States free, even if we can't do others. Nothing can be. Nothing can be really implemented worldwide if the United States is not part of it. So, yeah, this is a communist power grab that's very, very obvious. The Communist Party of Britain has got 2000, something like 2000 members right now. And one of them just happens to been appointed to one of the most important [00:10:00] positions and powerful positions on the planet right now.

Ann Vandersteel’s presentation at a SVPTF webinar, Every Breath You Take: Big Brother’s Plan to Stalk You through the WHO, on Feb. 27, 2023 Ann Vandersteel, co-chair of the Zelenko Freedom Foundation, has the honor of carrying forward the mission and legacy of world-renowned medical freedom fighter and humanitarian, Dr. Vladimir Zelenko. The launch of The Zelenko Report is one initiative in fulfilling his legacy with a live weekday show. Staying focused on real world solutions to positively impact communities decimated by corrupt establishment policies, engaging in community development, incubating technologies that have been suppressed by the medical industrial complex. Topic: How to Defend your God-given Rights and Constitutional Freedoms in the Face of Medical Tyranny and the threat of “public/private partnerships.“ TRANSCRIPT: Ann Vandersteel: [00:00:00] You know, we have been in the battle of our lives for freedom since 1776, and we've just witnessed the face, the most incredible political crime in history, in addition to the ongoing crimes of crimes against humanity. These public private partnerships are simply nothing more than just true fascism. And did you know that at the founding of our republic, there were actually only four federal crimes treason, counterfeiting, piracy and crimes against the laws of nations. Now, they're actually over 300,000 federal crimes, 300,000 [00:00:30] federal administrative regulations, many of which are punishable as crimes, and about 85,000 local governments with 513,000 elected officials, one in every 500 people. We now currently have an estimated 45 million laws on the books, all state, federal and local. So what we have coming with this international pandemic treaty, with the air regulations, a subversion of our body sovereignty, our true freedoms, what our founding fathers fought for is nothing short of blasphemy. [00:01:00] And our founding fathers were rolling in their graves right now. You know, God, the creator of the universe, actually gave us only ten laws from which we need to live our lives, the Ten Commandments. And I know sometimes for some, those are actually hard to actually imagine obeying or actually stay in line with. But imagine actually obeying 45 million laws. And then you layer on this international pandemic treaty, which takes everything that we know away and gives it to one man who is now essentially taking the place of God [00:01:30] and deciding for us what we need to do. It doesn't work for Americans, and Americans are inherently free. Ann Vandersteel: [00:01:36] Our DNA was here. We fought and died, and we still believe in freedom. You know, the rule of John Ashcroft has actually been replaced by the rule of law, where by federal officials on a whim, can now create new rules to bind in private, excuse me, bind and penalize private citizens. The W.H.O. will take it that much further. So they are going to be given if this actually goes [00:02:00] through the power to govern us based on health surveillance, what we're living in a surveillance state. The Patriot Act is what burgeoned us into the surveillance state, the Telecommunications Act of 1996, as marked by the Ericsson report coming out now, is showing us that the surveillance state is now being pushed on over into public health emergencies, using public health as a weapon. Public health emergency of international concern is the new jargon, and Tedros will be the new dictator. And [00:02:30] the last 100 years, powerful corporate interests have actually deliberately subverted into the intent of our founding fathers by financing the appointment of judges who enhanced would actually enhance corporate and federal power, weakening our constitutional system of checks and balances. The assaults actually began in the late 1800s, believe it or not, when federal courts, led by the Supreme Court, started chipping away at state sovereignty. And now the WHO intends to grab it all. Just remember this America and the rest of the world, our [00:03:00] country is what's standing between you and absolute tyranny. And of the 56 signers of the Declaration of Independence, nine actually never lived to see freedom, find five were imprisoned and 17 lost everything they had. Ann Vandersteel: [00:03:15] They pledge their lives, their fortunes, and their sacred honor on the premise that all men are created equal, endowed by their Creator with unalienable Rights, to be secured by a government that was actually subject to inferior into the consent, the consent of the government of [00:03:30] the governed. I have a question for everybody. Those men were great. That's what made America great. Are you ready to stand with those men again? We need to brace for impact because this is how far back it goes. Title 50. Chapter 32. Section 1520 permits the government to experiment on us with biological and chemical agents. And thanks to the treacherous, treasonous Congress that we have, it's now legal for the Department of Defense or their contractors to experiment with [00:04:00] biological and chemical agents on the American people. The actual only proviso that Congress imposes on them is that at least two unspecified local officials be notified within their subject community, like the garbage collector or the water meter reader. And once that major communication goes out, the test can begin within 30 days. Again, the W.H.O. won't need to worry about any of that. They will have complete power and control. And I contend regarding the 10th Amendment, as Dr. Boyle explained, [00:04:30] that this is a violation of our 10th Amendment, our states rights, but also the 14th Amendment in 1868, which was unconstitutionally ratified, I might add, stating that all persons born or naturalized in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and citizens where in the state they reside, well, no state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges. Ann Vandersteel: [00:05:00] Or [00:05:00] immunities of the citizens of the United States, nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty or property without due process of law, nor deny any person within his jurisdiction the equal protection of laws. Again, all that flies right out the window. Why? Because without even the Senate convening the W.H.O. pandemic treaty, the International Health regulation amendments will throw all that right out and fly in the face of everything [00:05:30] our founding fathers fought and died for. And everything that we as Americans have stood for for the past 250 years. Has it all been a waste? Has it all been smoke and mirrors? We intend to expose all that. And it's critical that you, the people, stand with all of us, that you understand what is at stake here. This is beyond 1775. It goes past 1776. This goes to the end. This is between you and your creator. Our creator, [00:06:00] our creator who gave us everything. God gave man dominion over the earth, the land, the air and the water. That is your law. That is your l. A w. Do you stand for law or do you stand with the tyrants? That is the question that is on the table right now. It is about freedom. God made man to be free, not just here in the great United States of America, but for all of God's children. He made us all different on different [00:06:30] continents and different cultures. For a reason, he made us in his image. Ann Vandersteel: [00:06:35] The W.H.O. wants to homogenize us, bring us all under their envelope. And God forbid you have a sniffle in Tanzania or a cough in New Zealand. Or runny nose in the United States. Tedros can decide whether or not they need to send in the troops. We cannot let this happen. We must stand. It is our godly duty. And with that, I am so grateful to have the opportunity to speak [00:07:00] to everybody here, because, again, Dr. Zelenko recognized that the serpent had many heads. He published a book recently, Post Mortem, I should say. It was almost complete, less the final chapter to which myself and several of his close confidants had the ability to be interviewed by the co author Brent Hammock. And the book is titled Dr. Zelenko Decapitating the Head of the Serpent. Well, I think it's very clear right now who the head of the serpent is. It's Tedros at the W.H.O.. [00:07:30] And as Dr. Zelenko so aptly referred to it, the World Homicide Organization, I think we can all agree what we've now witnessed in the past three years of the COVID 19 pandemic, the plandemic, the wake of the bodies. And as my colleagues today have said, they intend to do more damage. Dr. Yeadon is right. They did a sloppy job the first time. But mark my words and mark Dr. Hewson's words. They won't do a sloppy job the next time they're going to continue to come beside for their actual [00:08:00] agenda, which is not only global genocide, but submission to the One World Order.

In the past decade, U.S. financial managers have transferred trillions to companies owned or controlled by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) — by some estimates $3-6 trillion — from Americans who placed their money in pension plans, mutual funds, index funds, exchange traded funds and other investment vehicles. In many cases, the ordinary American investors’ Return on Investment (RoI) has been checkered, at best, while Wall Street’s “masters of the universe” made fortunes. Too frequently, American investors are unaware how their investments are being used to buy into Chinese companies to the benefit of the CCP — including to underwrite its unrestricted warfare against this country. Worse yet, as Chinese dictator Xi Jinping intensifies preparations to engage not only in pre-kinetic warfare, but the shooting kind, little — if any — effort is being made by companies like BlackRock, Vanguard, State Street, Bridgewater and Fidelity to apprise their American clients of a serious material risk to their investments in China. In the event of a war with China, the regime in Beijing may preclude the repatriation of at least some, and perhaps all, such foreign investment. Moderator: - Frank Gaffney, executive chairman of the Center for Security Policy, host of Securing America with Frank Gaffney on Real America’s Voice Network, and vice-chair for the Committee on the Present Danger: China Panelists: - Kevin Freeman, CFA, Host of Economic War Room with Kevin Freeman; President, National Security Investment Consultants Institute; author, Secret Weapon, Game Plan and According to Plan Topic: The Inadvisability and National Security Risks of Investing in the Chinese Communist Party; Invest Patriotically, Instead - Joel Caplan, Investor in a Chinese NASDAC-listed corporation who was defrauded out of millions of dollars in capital and has been unable to collect in judgments Topic: The ‘China Hussle’ — Insights from One of its Victims - Colonel Grant Newsham, U.S. Marine Corps (Ret.), Former Marine Attaché in Japan; former Foreign Service Officer; former East Asia-based corporate executive; Senior Fellow, Center for Security Policy Topic: An Experienced Businessman and China Hand’s Assessment of the Prospects of Getting Your Money Back in Case the CCP Goes to War - Bill Walton, Chairman, Resolute Protector Foundation; Host, The Bill Walton Show, CEO of a $6 billion NYSE-traded private investment firm for 14 years; headed all the economic agency action teams (e.g. Treasury, Commerce, USTR, SEC et al) teams for the 2016 Trump Transition Topic: What is Wall Street Not Telling You: Undisclosed Material Risk Amidst Growing Concern about the Safety of Chinese Investments? - Brian T. Kennedy, Chairman, Committee on the Present Danger: China; President of American Strategy Group; Former President, Claremont Institute Topic: The CCP’s Sovereign Debt: A Cautionary Tale for U.S. Investors

The World Health Organization (WHO) is simultaneously negotiating two instruments: Amendments to the International Health Regulations and a new, so-called “WHO convention, agreement or other international instrument on pandemic prevention, preparedness and response” — in reality, a treaty. These instruments could be voted on and adopted as early as May. According to analysis of the most recent drafts published by the WHO, both of these instruments contain language which, if passed, establish a global biomedical surveillance state and seriously damage our national sovereignty. The WHO refuses to call either of the two documents “treaties” in an attempt to circumvent the treaty process. Meanwhile, it has just come to light that, within the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) which passed in Congress in December, is another act that appears to have pre-approved whatever instruments are approved by the WHO. This “Act within an Act” is named the Global Health Security and International Pandemic Prevention, Preparedness and Response Act of 2022. It is found on page 950 of the 1772-page NDAA with a shortform title, which Biden signed into law on December 23, 2022. “This International Pandemic Preparedness Act of 2022 cannot be constitutional,” said Reggie Littlejohn, attorney and co-chair of the Stop Vax Passports Taskforce referring to the shortform title for the act. “I doubt that most Congressional representatives are even aware that this pernicious Act — which completely circumvents Senate approval required by our treaty process — is hidden deep within the NDAA. According to Dr. Francis Boyle, a panelist on our upcoming program, Congress — likely unwittingly — has already given the WHO a greenlight for whatever instruments they pass, regardless of whether these international instruments impinge on our national sovereignty or personal freedom. American voters need to know that the International Pandemic Preparedness Act of 2022 gives carte blanche to the WHO to decide if they should be empowered unilaterally to impose all matter of public health emergency mandates on America and other nations, as well as be able to enforce those mandates through vast monitoring and compliance policies written into the documents. This is a global scheme to steal sovereignty from nation states, track citizens with digital IDs, restrict movement, censor free speech, and ultimately, destroy Western Civilization.” In an effort to educate the public and alert representatives of the dangers of these instruments, which are being negotiated now and which could come up for a vote as soon as the World Health Assembly, May 20-30, 2023, the Stop Vax Passports Task Force (SVPTF), sponsored by the Committee on the Present Danger: China (CPDC) and Women’s Right’s Without Frontiers (WRWF), is hosting a panel of experts to discuss what the WHO is cooking up to force feed Americans and what can be done to stop them. Co-Host and Moderator - Frank Gaffney: Co-Chair of the Stop Vax Passports Taskforce, Executive Chairman of the Center for Security Policy, host of Securing America TV, and vice-chair for the Committee on the Present Danger: China. Co-Host and Panelist - Reggie Littlejohn, President of Women’s Rights Without Frontiers, Co-Chair of the Stop Vaccine Passports Task Force. A graduate of Yale Law School, she is an expert on coercive population control and human rights in China and has testified nine times at the United States Congress. She equally focuses her efforts on stopping Chinese-style tyranny from spreading to the United States and worldwide through a totalitarian biotech surveillance state. Topic: How the WHO is poised to seize our personal medical freedom and national sovereignty, establishing a totalitarian bio-tech surveillance state, through its proposed Amendments to the International Health Regulations and new Pandemic Accord. Panelists - Dr. Michael Yeadon, PhD, former Vice-President and Chief Scientific Officer for Allergic and Respiratory Diseases worldwide for the drug company, Pfizer. He is the co-founder and former CEO of the biotech company Ziarco. Topic: Are the MRNA injections toxic by mistake or by design? Why is the WHO pressing them on the world? - Dr. Francis Boyle, PhD, professor of international law at the University of Illinois College of Law. He received his JD degree magna cum laude from Harvard Law School, and a PhD in Political Science from Harvard University. Professor Boyle served on the Board of Directors of Amnesty International. He drafted the U.S. domestic implementing legislation for the Biological Weapons Convention, known as the Biological Weapons Anti-Terrorism Act of 1989, that was approved unanimously by both Houses of the U.S. Congress and signed into law by President George H.W. Bush. Topic: The WHO’s Plan to Be a Global Dictator, to Nullify National Sovereignty through the new Treaty and Amendments to the International Health Regulations, and to Create Emergencies to Enslave Humanity. - Trevor Loudon, author and filmmaker, “The Enemies Within” and “The Enemies Within the Church”; contributor, Epoch Times. Topic: China’s Outsize Influence at the WHO; The WHO’s Pandemic Response and the China Model. - Dr. David Bell, Senior Scholar at Brownstone Institute, is a public health physician and biotech consultant in global health. He is a former medical officer and scientist at the World Health Organization (WHO), Programme Head for malaria and febrile diseases at the Foundation for Innovative New Diagnostics (FIND) in Geneva, Switzerland, and Director of Global Health Technologies at Intellectual Ventures Global Good Fund in Bellevue, WA, USA. Topic: Amendments to the WHO’s International Health Regulations: An Attempt to Implement an Existential Change in Sovereign Rights and International Relations. - Ann Vandersteel, co-chair of the Zelenko Freedom Foundation, has the honor of carrying forward the mission and legacy of world-renowned medical freedom fighter and humanitarian, Dr. Vladimir Zelenko. The launch of The Zelenko Report is one initiative in fulfilling his legacy with a live weekday show. Staying focused on real world solutions to positively impact communities decimated by corrupt establishment policies, engaging in community development, incubating technologies that have been suppressed by the medical industrial complex. Topic: How to Defend your God-given Rights and Constitutional Freedoms in the Face of Medical Tyranny and the threat of “public/private partnerships.“

Is the PRC Arming Russia and the Prospects for a Second Front in the Pacific In the course of the Werkunde Security Conference in Munich last weekend, U.S. officials warned that the Chinese Communist Party is contemplating sending arms to Russia in support of its invasion of Ukraine and, as Secretary of State Tony Blinken put it, “that would cause a problem for us.” In fact, the CCP has already been financing the Vladimir Putin’s war with its imports of Russian energy, food and other commodities from the Kremlin. Three questions immediately occur: 1) Is it likely that the Chinese Communists have also been covertly providing weapons to its “No-Limits” Partner in Moscow? 2) Whether such transfers have already occurred or are still in the offing, what can – and will – America do, if anything, to alleviate such a “problem”? And 3) Either way, is the CCP benefiting from the Putin’s raging war in Ukraine and, if so, what does that portend for it opening a second, bloody front in the Pacific? This CPDC webinar examines these and related topics on the eve of the first anniversary of Putin’s latest invasion of Ukrainian territory. Moderator: - Frank Gaffney, executive chairman of the Center for Security Policy, host of Securing America with Frank Gaffney on Real America’s Voice Network, and vice-chair for the Committee on the Present Danger: China Panelists: - Dr. Phillip Karber, PhD, Marine Corps veteran; longtime public servant in the national security arena; former senior defense industry executive; former professor at Georgetown University, the National War College, and other academic institutions* — Topic: The Reality and the Danger of a Sino-Russian Axis - Dr. Stephen Blank, PhD, Senior Fellow, Foreign Policy Research Institute; former Professor, Army War College; author, Light from the East: Russia’s Quest for Great Power Status in Asia – Topic: “Putin’s Ambitions in Ukraine and Beyond” - Honorable/Lieutenant Colonel Chuck DeVore, U.S. Army Reserves (Ret.); former member, California State Assembly; Chief National Initiatives Officer, Texas Public Policy Institute; co-author, China Attacks – Topic: “How Goes the War in Ukraine – with Chinese Characteristics?” - Colonel John Mills, U.S. Army (Ret.), Former Special Operator specializing in Psychological Warfare; former senior executive responsible for Cyber Policy in the Office of Secretary of Defense; author, The Nation Will Follow: Firsthand Experiences Fighting the Deep State and the Action Plan for the American Citizen* – Topic: “It’s Past Time to Restore U.S. Deterrence to Nuclear Attack” - Dr. Bradley Thayer, PhD, Director for China Policy, Center for Security Policy; co-author, Understanding the China Threat and How China Sees the World: Han Centrism and the Balance of Power in International Politics* — Topic: “The Ukraine Precedent and Lessons for the Pacific”

Experts Evaluate the Evidence —and the Implications — if the Answer is ‘Yes’ The spectacle of at least one Chinese spy balloon penetrating sovereign U.S. airspace for the purpose of surveilling and collecting intelligence over three bases housing America’s intercontinental-range ballistic missile, among other national security-sensitive sites, has prompted concern among the American people and appropriately widespread criticism among their elected representatives. Those responses have only been further intensified by the U.S. military’s subsequent intercepts of three “aerial vehicles” whose nature and purpose have yet to be disclosed. Legitimate questions abound concerning what the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) is obtaining via such espionage; how long the CCP has been using balloons here and elsewhere; and why the Biden administration — which evidently was on notice about this operation for over a week before the first penetration took place — failed to act to prevent it. One line of inquiry that has received scant attention to date, however, involves a surpassingly important topic: Does the first surveillance balloon’s flight path shed light on the Chinese Communists’ attitude about fighting and winning a nuclear war — and what does America know more generally about its capabilities and intentions in those regards? Moderator: - Frank Gaffney,executive chairman of the Center for Security Policy, host ofSecuring America with Frank Gaffneyon Real America’s Voice Network, and vice-chair for the Committee on the Present Danger: China Panelists: - Richard Fisher: Senior Fellow for Asia, Institute for Assessment and Strategy; author: China’s Military Modernization: Building for Regional and Global Reach Topic: “The Chinese Communist Party’s Nuclear Modernization — Building to a First-strike Capability?” - Dr. Mark Schneider, PhD: Senior Analyst with the National Institute for Public Policy; former career senior executive and duty expert on nuclear weapons policy and arms control in the Office of the Secretary of Defense; former Foreign Service Officer; and former Professional Staff Member, Senate Select Committee on Intelligence Topic: “The CCP’s Strategic Defenses: Enablers of Nuclear Warfighting?” - Dr. Phillip Karber, PhD: Marine Corps veteran; longtime public servant in the national security arena; former senior defense industry executive; former professor at Georgetown University, the National War College, and other academic institutions Topic: “The Nuclear Warfighting with Chinese Characteristics: The CCP’s Doctrine for Fighting and Winning”