DOES GOD EXIST

ARTICLE (THE JUST SO EVOUTIONARY BS STORY) Controversial T. Rex Soft Tissue Find Finally Explained By Stephanie Pappas, Senior Writer | November 26, 2013 07:01pm ET ...... The controversial discovery of 68-million-year-old soft tissue from the bones of a Tyrannosaurus rex finally has a physical explanation. According to new research, iron in the dinosaur's body preserved the tissue before it could decay. ...... The research, headed by Mary Schweitzer, a molecular paleontologist at North Carolina State University, explains how proteins — and possibly even DNA — can survive millennia. Schweitzer and her colleagues first raised this question in 2005, when they found the seemingly impossible: soft tissue preserved inside the leg of an adolescent Trex unearthed in Montana. "What we found was unusual, because it was still soft and still transparent and still flexible," Schweitzer told LiveScience. ......"The problem is, for 300 years, we thought, 'Well, the organics are all gone, so why should we look for something that's not going to be there?' and nobody looks," she said. ...... The obvious question, though, was how soft, pliable tissue could survive for millions of years. In a new study published today (Nov. 26) in the journal Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, Schweitzer thinks she has the answer: Iron. Iron lady ...... Iron is an element present in abundance in the body, particularly in the blood, where it is part of the protein that carries oxygen from the lungs to the tissues. Iron is also highly reactive with other molecules, so the body keeps it locked up tight, bound to molecules that prevent it from wreaking havoc on the tissues. ..... After death, though, iron is let free from its cage. It forms minuscule iron nanoparticles and also generates free radicals, which are highly reactive molecules thought to be involved in aging. "The free radicals cause proteins and cell membranes to tie in knots," Schweitzer said. "They basically act like formaldehyde." ....MY RESPONSES TO THE CLAIMS GIVEN IN THE ARTICLE OCCUMS RAZOR: The simplest explanation tends to be the correct one. ...... So according to the article—for 300 years—science taught that fossils, which have to be millions of years old, could not and would not have any biological materials left. According to Neil deGrasse Tyson, all fossils are “rocks,” even the bone materials are gone. However, now today Evolutionists know differently but they keep sticking to their millions of years MANTRA story. ...... The History of dinosaur artifacts like cave paintings and pottery, proves beyond a reasonable doubt, that men living even a few thousand years ago must have “put their eyes” on these creatures. Furthermore, FREE RADICALS, antioxidents and mary Schweitzer’S THEORY WHERE IS THE LOGIC? ......Free Radicals Medical Definition: an especially reactive atom or group of atoms that has one or more unpaired electrons; especially : one that is produced in the body by natural biological processes or introduced from outside (as in tobacco smoke, toxins, or pollutants) and that can damage cells, proteins, and DNA by altering their chemical structure. ......Anti-Oxidents Definition: a substance that inhibits oxidation, especially one used to counteract the deterioration of stored food products. a substance such as vitamin C or E that removes potentially damaging oxidizing agents in a living organism. So the Article claims that iron in the blood can preserve the tissues like a type of formaldehyde ...... Now I have to break one of my rules not to use evidence from a Creationist Scientist because no one else dare talk about it. The man in the video is Mark Armitage Lets Watch the Video https://youtu.be/iN04I8HuFGw Why was Mark Armitage fired? Do “evolutionists” seem to care about following the evidence where it leads? Do “scientists” in general have a bias? What is wrong with Mary Schweitzer’s theory of “Free Radical Iron” acting like a tissue preservative? ELEPHANT IN THE ROOM VIDEOS https://studio.youtube.com/video/uZ0Fg2Jju0Y/edit https://studio.youtube.com/video/Ld_3cCjM0SU/edit Why won’t scientists allow a Carbon 14 test to be done? Why—is the previous “science belief” of 1 Million Years max for biological materials thrown out—instead of realizing that perhaps the Dinosaurs in question are NOT older than 1 Million Years? What happens to Scientists that don’t toe the Evolutionary Fairy Tale? A GOOD HELPING OF EVOLUTIONARY BIAS ANYONE. THIS IS WHY I WILL NEVER BELIEVE IN EVOLUTION—EVERYTHING—EVEN SCIENCE IS PC.

ALBERT EINSTEIN “DISCOVERED” SOMETHING THAT WAS ALREADY IN THE BIBLE 2400 YEARS BEFORE EINSTEIN. ......In Einstein’s theory of Special Relativity, one of the concepts that Einstein elucidated in a thought experiment, is the concept of Time Dilation. I will explain the concept in some detail in a moment, and to make the concept easier to understand, I will use three short video clips from Carl Sagan; first up: https://rumble.com/vc7pz1-albert-einstein-discovered-something-that-was-already-in-the-bible-2400-yea.html In this video, Carl Sagan creates his own thought experiment, with two adolescent brothers and a moto scooter. The observer of the video, watches as the older brother takes off on his motor scooter—and we are left to imagine, that the older brother is riding a scooter that can approach the speed of light. The older brother, rides around the country side for just a few minutes at this speed, but when he returns to the place where he left his younger brother, the younger brother is now in his eighties. So time, has passed differently for each brother, and for the older brother who went on the speed of light trip, he was propelled into the future in only a few minutes. ...... Another example comes from the movie “contact,” a book that Carl Sagan wrote, and his wife produced into a movie: https://rumble.com/vd8tpn-time-dilation-gods-method-of-creation-explained-in-science-and-the-bible.html. In the movie the actress played by Jody Foster, has been selected to “travel to Vega” at the speed of light, and if she does this—according to Einstein’s Theory—her trip should take her 4 years, but when she returns to earth, over 50 years could pass on Earth. In the movie, what actually happens is the opposite. The character played by Jodie Foster, goes on the trip, but she is gone only an imperceptible microsecond from the perspective of Earth; however, from her time perspective, she has been gone 18 hours. Consequently, the character in the movie, has a great deal of difficulty convincing a skeptical world, she even left; let alone, believing she had an experience communicating with a being, disguised as her deceased father. I call this the “technology induced vision” that all prophets of God must have had—since all materialists know that “visions” don’t occur—but I digress. ...... Last, but the most important video, is from Carl Sagan’s show the cosmos: https://rumble.com/vb19sl-carl-sagan-time-dilation.html In this video, Carl Sagan talks about two different types of time. Ship Time at the speed of light, and Earth time. The most important comparison in the video, is when Carl Sagan talks about the Ship Time to circumnavigate the entire Known universe (56 years for the Space Ship Traveler) and the amount of “Earth time” that would have passed for those left behind (Carl Sagan says, “they would [BE] 10s of Billions of Years in the Far Far Future” Earth Time). In fact, Earth would have been destroyed by our sun going Super Nova before we return, BUT for the sake of argument, we imagine again, that the Earth is still here. ...... Now what is the conversation we would have, with those people on the Earth? We would exclaim—it is I, the space traveler, one of your ancestors, and only 56 years have passed since I left Earth. Of course, the people on the Earth would claim I was insane. According to our history, that space flight took place Billions and Billions of years ago, and there is no way you are the astronaut that left Earth so long ago. Question: Which group is telling the truth about the passage of time? Answer—Both of them ...... Now—is it possible, scientifically, for two conscious beings to experience time, but at different rates? The answer is of course yes, and our modern GPS system is an example. Briefly, if the GPS satellite system clocks were not adjusted a few milliseconds each day, the system would be off by about 6 miles, each day. Why, the satellites are 12,000 miles up, and traveling about 17,000 miles an hour around our Earth. Time slows down for them by a few milliseconds a day compared to Earth Bound clocks, thus the need for adjustment. ......Now the best part, what in the world does this have to do with the Bible, time dilation, and sheep herders in the Land of Israel 2400 years ago during the time of King David, and 2000 years ago with the Apostle Peter? Lets start with: 2 Peter 3:8 8 But do not forget this one thing, dear friends: With the Lord a day is like a thousand years, and a thousand years are like a day. ...... It is very important to find out what Peter means by this statement, but first I want to concentrate on how Peter could possibly have come up with this statement. As Christians, we of course believe in divine revelation though the holy spirit is one possible way—but my Atheist friends are already groaning. The other possible way, is the Old Testament. In fact, Psalm 90:4 adds a critical component to what Peter wrote. Here is the verse: A thousand years in your sight are like a day that has just gone by, or like a watch in the night. ...... So the first part of the Psalm, basically mirrors what Peter wrote, but the last part of the verse is key: “or like a watch in the night.” So what is a watch in the night—3 hours of time. There were 4 watches each night, for a total of 12 hours. ...... The real question is then, are these two verses teaching a dogmatic rule, or are they teaching a concept? In other words, I have heard the 2 Peter 3:8 verse used over and over again in a sermon, and the Day to thousand year ratio was maintained like a dogmatic Law of some sort. However, when taught in light of Psalm 90:4, the verse is teaching a concept, a principle, that applies to God—in this universe. And what concept might that be?—Time Dilation of course. For God, time is relative. If God chooses—he can spend 1000 of his years, in a space of only 3 hours of Earth Time. Or, if God chooses—he can spend a 1000 of his years in one day of Earth Time. Or (since this is a principle and not a dogmatic rule) if God chooses—he can spend a 1000 of his years in only 3 seconds of Earth time. ...... Conversely, two thousand years can pass here on Earth, but for God, only 48 hours could have past, or 6 hours, or 6 seconds. The truly amazing thing is, until Albert Einstein elucidated his Theory of Special Relativity, ideas like these were relegated to science fiction. Today, this is scientifically possible in this universe. ...... Now, think about the 6 days of creation, spoken about in the Book of Genesis. From who’s perspective, are these days given? Since man is not created until the 6th day—and the Bible says we are still in the 7th day, they must be from God’s perspective. Therefore, if time is relative for God, he can “live” 1,000, or 10,000 or 100,000 or 1 Billion years in one 24 hour Earth day. And, again, conversely, a 24 hour period of time could pass for God, yet a billion years could pass on Earth. Since this IS A SCIENTIFIC possibility, and not simply speculation, this can go a long way to reconcile the young Earth, old Earth debate. ...... Furthermore, think of the Carl Sagan video of Ship Time vs Earth time, and ask yourself, can both time frames be TRUE AT THE SAME TIME—and the answer is an unequivocal YES. Scientifically, all of what I have written is possible, and instead of getting bogged down, on which side is “right,” it is enough to know that scientifically, BOTH can be right at the same time literally. Furthermore, and even more important than all the concepts learned, is the fact—and let me stress fact—both in the Old Testament of the Bible, the New Testament of the Bible, separated by several hundred years, and different authors—a scientific principle (“discovered” by Albert Einstein) was written in the Scriptures. Given the time period these concepts were first written down, it is impossible for these individuals to have learned this information, using “scientific principles and methods.” Instead, this information must have been given to each author—by revelation from a source outside themselves. ...... And now you actually have evidence from the Bible, that God exists, has undoubtedly communicated with his creation, and given its scientifically illiterate authors, information they were incapable of learning in their respective time periods. CLUE: Maybe it has become clear by now, why God wrote the scriptures when He did, and by whom He chose. If God had waited until today, to reveal this Time Dilation idea, man could say HO HUM, TOO LATE. But, give the ideas to a group of men, unable to learn it any other way then revelation, and Gods Word is believable. ...... Did God create the heavens and the Earth in 6 literal Earth days, it’s possible, especially if God crammed a few billion of HIS years into each 24 hour period. In fact, what would that look like if you could observe something like this happening on the Earth? Here is a small video clip of what it may have been like: https://rumble.com/vd16ot-days-of-creation-in-fast-forward-time-dilation.html ...... Or, God could have created the heavens and the earth, in the space of 13.6 billion years Earth Time, yet for God only the equivalent of 6, 24 hour days passed. Both ARE scientifically possible, and at this juncture—I am not trying to take a side. What is of more importance to me, is the fact that, scientifically, both time perspectives, can be correct at the same time. Now, there is just one other Biblical aspect, I want to bring into this discussion. Eternity. Romans 8:19-22 19 For [even the whole] creation [all nature] waits eagerly for the children of God to be revealed. 20 For the creation was subjected to frustration and futility, not willingly [because of some intentional fault on its part], but by the will of Him who subjected it, in hope 21 that the creation itself will also be freed from its bondage to decay [and gain entrance] into the glorious freedom of the children of God. 22 For we know that the whole creation has been moaning together as in the pains of childbirth until now. ...... The fall of Adam and Eve, affected all “even the whole creation all nature.” Before the fall, God looked on his entire creation and said in Genesis 1:31 “31 God saw everything that He had made, and behold, it was very good and He validated it completely. And there was evening and there was morning, a sixth day.” And Romans 5:12 12 Therefore, just as sin came into the world through one man, and death through sin, so death spread to all people [no one being able to stop it or escape its power], because they all sinned. ...... So from these two passages, we see a change in the creation—the entire creation is affected—after Adam and Eve sin. Death, comes into the world at the fall, after God had said “it was very good.” The point I am trying to get to is, Eternity. In other words, before the fall, Adam and Eve were living in Eternity, not in “Time” as we know it today. So, when “God said let there be light” and the Universe was brought into being—the Universe we know today, appeared, with fully formed galaxies. Why fully formed—because there was NO TIME needed for them to form. There was NO TIME needed for the light from the distant stars to travel to the Earth. ...... Since there is NO TIME, before the fall, whatever God creates—takes NO TIME to form period. Each created biological entity appears fully formed without the passage of the “time” we are used to. Our TIME, as we know it, does not exist in Heaven or on the Earth, during the creation. I can’t tell you how many testimonies, I have heard from people who claim to have gone either to Heaven, or Hell, and they say it seemed like I was their an eternity—since there is no time in Heaven or Hell. Eternity, was in operation, but after the fall, Time began, and the whole creation was subject to “decay.” Subject to decay—the second law of thermodynamics is born. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-6a7HFwLoa8 And today, the entire universe is accelerating towards its own “heat death.” BUT PRAISE THE NAME OF JESUS, WE HAVE NOTHING TO FEAR IF WE KNOW HIM.

THE CAMBRIAN EXPLOSION 3 VIDEOS AND DIRECTED PANSPERMIA ...... It's always a bad say for the evolutionists these days, when their little pond story, is a fairy tale of the highest order. Instead, even the secular scientists realize more and more, that LIFE DID NOT EVOLVE ON this planet. Instead, Life EXPLODED on this planet--just like the BIBLE said it did. Three little SECULAR videos for your amusement--and again, they are form people on your side of the isle. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3mflGLOXeJ0 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iQuG6bQLIAk https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4uNRpvY4FsI ...... In fact, thanks to the prompting of the Atheists on these youtube channels, sending me all kinds of articles about RNA BEING the precursor to DNA, I ran across a very recent article that sheds NEW LIGHT ON THE SUBJECT. Here is their conclusion statement: "Co-author Dr. Jay Goodwin, a chemist with Emory University says "It is truly exciting to consider the potential for alternate genetic systems, based on these analogous nucleotides -- that these might possibly have emerged and evolved in different environments, perhaps even on other planets or moons within our solar system. These alternate genetic systems might expand our conception of biology's 'central dogma' into new evolutionary directions, in response and robust to increasingly challenging environments here on Earth." (DNA is only one among millions of possible genetic molecules November 11, 2019 Tokyo Institute of Technology) " ...... SO LIFE organics, ORIGINATED ON OTHER PLANETS OR MOONS ("IN OUR SOLAR SYSTEM"), NOT ON THIS PLANET, BUT EVOLVED AND CAME FROM OUTER SPACE. WHY DO THEY CONCLUDE THIS, BECAUSE AND I QUOTE: “in response and robust to increasingly challenging environments here on Earth.” IN OTHER WORDS, EVOLUTION ON THIS PLANET IS IMPOSSIBLE--AND THAT IS BASED ON THE EVIDENCE AND SCIENCE THESE SECULAR SCIENTISTS HAVE. . To add insult to injury—ask yourself a simple question: Which planet in our solar system has the richest amount of resources for life?—well it’s the Earth of course—but now they say life did not originate on this planet but came form a moon or other planet IN OUR SOLAR SYSTEM. This is a significant statement, because for life to originate somewhere outside of our solar system by only natural means, is absolutely impossible, and secular scientists know this. ...... So, today more and more secular scientists, see the Cambrian explosion--and a new find in China--makes it more certain than ever. When a Chinese scientist shared his Cambrian Explosion findings, a western scientist asked him if he was concerned about the repercussions of his findings, and the Chinese scientist says, "in China we can't question the government, but we can question Darwin, while in America you can question your government, but you can't question Darwin." So how exactly did all the major body plans just show up? Why have non theistic scientists, come up with "directed panspermia" like in the movie clip, where the actor Don Cheadle, exclaims "that's it". If the fossil record is so complete as you suggest, and the evidence for evolution so sure, then why did RICHARD DAWKINS feel the need to talk about "directed panspermia? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xb9HQyDTOK8 BECAUSE THE FOSSIL RECORD IS NOT AT ALL COMPELLING EVIDENCE. ...... It is a wonderful day for a person of FAITH in this country, and based on the science we have. Praise Jesus.

.....A person commented and asked about "the order of the fossils in the geological column" Three videos to question the Geologic Column" 1) One volcano in the United States laid down over 600 feet of deposits, in only a few years time. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tt2TCbGxmDg, But if the evolutionist had not seen the event--you can bet that BILLIONS OF YEARS WOULD BE THE EXCUSE PERIOD, and of course the layers would line up perfectly with the Geologic column--because of course they are the authorities, and you must believe what gets published. 2) A trilobite, is an index fossil. An index fossil, is a fossil that is used to date a particular portion of the strata, in the Geologic Column. Well, supposedly if you come across a trilobite, you have reached the LAST layer with any biological material, called the Cambrian Layer. hmmmmmmm, what is a modern shoe print doing stepping on an extinct trilobite? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jjDYaerUIJU .....How come discoveries like this never make it into the textbooks, and why were the scientists in the video afraid to have anything to do with this find? Its called THE EVOLUTIONARY ESTABLISHMENT'S WITCH TRIALS AND INQUISITION. 3) In this video, a secular scientist is explaining the layers he observes in the Grand Canyon. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EjiAgoxzcps Now the canyon is 300 or so miles from any ocean, yet, at the bottom of the canyon, and a mile high--he finds ocean fossils--NOT THE POINT OF MY ARGUMENT BUT I COULD NOT RESIST (FLOOD ANYONE). His explanation for the 8 different layers in the canyon, is the SEA must of covered that area, 8 different times, over BILLIONS of years. But now we are talking about a "local" sea flood, 8 different times. Where is this ubiquitous geologic column at? This would be an example of a "local" geologic column. Also, If one modern volcano can put down 600 feet of deposits in only a few years--why does it take Billions of years for the Grand Canyon--which scientists say was formed by 100 volcanoes? .......NOTHING IS EVER AS EASY AND AIR TIGHT AS THE EVOLUTIONIST WOULD HAVE YOU BELIEVE--And whenever the science goes against them, they bury it as fast as possible, OR SCREAM HOAX, and attack the finder.

THE CAMBRIAN EXPLOSION 3 VIDEOS AND DIRECTED PANSPERMIA ..... It's always a bad say for the evolutionists these days, when their little pond story, is a fairy tale of the highest order. Instead, even the secular scientists realize more and more, that LIFE DID NOT EVOLVE ON this planet. Instead, Life EXPLODED on this planet--just like the BIBLE said it did. Three little videos for your amusement--and again, they are form people on your side of the isle. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3mflGLOXeJ0 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iQuG6bQLIAk https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4uNRpvY4FsI ...... In fact, thanks to the prompting of the Atheists on these youtube channels, sending me all kinds of articles about RNA BEING the precursor to DNA, I ran across a very recent article that sheds NEW LIGHT ON THE SUBJECT. Here is their conclusion statement: "Co-author Dr. Jay Goodwin, a chemist with Emory University says "It is truly exciting to consider the potential for alternate genetic systems, based on these analogous nucleosides -- that these might possibly have emerged and evolved in different environments, perhaps even on other planets or moons within our solar system. These alternate genetic systems might expand our conception of biology's 'central dogma' into new evolutionary directions, in response and robust to increasingly challenging environments here on Earth." (DNA is only one among millions of possible genetic molecules November 11, 2019 Tokyo Institute of Technology) " ...... SO LIFE organics, ORIGINATED ON OTHER PLANETS OR MOONS ("IN OUR SOLAR SYSTEM"), NOT ON THIS PLANET, BUT EVOLVED AND CAME FROM OUTER SPACE. WHY DO THEY CONCLUDE THIS, BECAUSE AND I QUOTE: “in response and robust to increasingly challenging environments here on Earth.” IN OTHER WORDS, EVOLUTION ON THIS PLANET IS IMPOSSIBLE--AND THAT IS BASED ON THE EVIDENCE AND SCIENCE THESE SECULAR SCIENTISTS HAVE. . To add insult to injury—ask yourself a simple question: Which planet in our solar system has the richest amount of resources for life?—well it’s the Earth of course—but now they say life did not originate on this planet but came form a moon or other planet IN OUR SOLAR SYSTEM. This is a significant statement, because for life to originate somewhere outside of our solar system by only natural means, is absolutely impossible, and secular scientists know this. ......To make matters worse for the evolutionist, today more and more secular scientists, acknowledge the Cambrian explosion--and a new find in China--makes it more certain than ever. When a Chinese scientist shared his Cambrian Explosion findings, a western scientist asked him if he was concerned about the repercussions of his findings, and the Chinese scientist says, "in China we can't question the government, but we can question Darwin, while in America you can question your government, but you can't question Darwin." So how exactly did all the major body plans just show up? Why have non theistic scientists, come up with "directed panspermia" like in the movie clip, where the actor Don Cheadle, exclaims "that's it". If the fossil record is so complete as you suggest, and the evidence for evolution so sure, then why did RICHARD DAWKINS feel the need to talk about "directed panspermia? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xb9HQyDTOK8 BECAUSE THE FOSSIL RECORD IS NOT AT ALL COMPELLING EVIDENCE. It is a wonderful day for a person of FAITH in this country, and based on the science we have. Praise Jesus.

THE ACCELERATING EXPANSION OF THE UNIVERSE DARK MATTER AND DARK ENERGY EXPLAINED ...... A commenter wrote "In fact, your bible does NOT explain WHY THE ENTIRE UNIVERSE IS STILL MOVING OUTWARDS!" ...... Actually, the Bible does more than that. Now, before I begin to explain, I want this thought in your head. "How could sheep herders in the land of Israel, know something about the Universe, that was learned in the late 1990s by a group of scientists, with Alexei Vladimir "Alex" Filippenko, being one of the scientists? When I was in college in the 1980s, I took a physics class from a professor that worked on the Manhattan Project. At that time everyone knew that the universe was expanding, but what they did not know is 1) is the universe expanding but slowing down and headed for a big crunch? 2) expanding and proceeding at a steady pace 3) or the Universe is expanding, and at an accelerated rate. This is the one they did NOT WANT, or believe to be possible. ...... Why did they believe that number three was not possible--Acceleration. If the Big Bang Happened 13.6 billion years ago, the "explosion" is over, and there should be NO continued force on the universe. This is a purely MATERIALISTIC view of the universe. Yet, all accelerating bodies--even in the vacuum of space need a FORCE to continue the acceleration process. Low and behold, what have they found, an accelerating universe. MYSTERY, what is causing the acceleration? In fact, the universe seems to be violating Einstein's rule that no matter can travel faster than the speed of light. https://youtu.be/viKr6W4fVFA. As any matter reaches closer and closer to the speed of light its Mass increases to infinity. YET as Alexei Vladimir "Alex" Filippenko, will tell you today, the distant galaxies are moving away from us FASTER THAN THE SPEED OF LIGHT. https://youtu.be/2sEPkycgmhY ......Just a few decades ago this was thought to be impossible. Today, they now have created an exception--the galaxies are not technically moving--the space between the galaxies is being stretched. Today scientists have a MADE UP term for this FORCE, they call it DARK ENERGY. But in 2020 they have no idea what it is, nor where it comes form. Period. https://youtu.be/K2iGoFZ8ftM ...... Now the best part for me, Psalms NIV 104:2 The Lord wraps himself in light as with a garment; he stretches out the heavens like a tent. JOB 9:8 NIV He alone stretches out the heavens and treads on the waves of the sea. Isaiah 42.5 NIV This is what God the Lord says— the Creator of the heavens, who stretches them out, who spreads out the earth with all that springs from it, who gives breath to its people, and life to those who walk on it. Psalms 104:2 "He stretches" (present tense, and implying that he is currently applying a force) "out the heavens" "like a tent". Einstein himself talked about space as a fabric, and our God, the creator of the Universe, with one simple phrase, explained what the Universe is doing in 2020 that was only discovered in all of human history in the late 1990s. And the only way sheep herders in the land of Israel 3600 years ago could know this is by divine revelation. PROOF THAT GOD EXISTS, LOVES HIS CHILDREN, and COMMUNICATES WITH THEM. ...... By the way, I just showed what DARK ENERGY is. Now what is Dark Matter, does the Bible have anything to say about that? Why yes. First What is Dark Matter. It is a Force acting in the universe that the scientists of today can see its affects, but they have no idea in 2020 what it is. https://youtu.be/utIk779CeFI What this force is doing is quite interesting. Just as our Earth revolves around the Sun, our solar system is part of a vast Galaxy, called the Milky Way Galaxy, and our Galaxy is spinning around a Black Hole at its center. Scientists were surprised to find that there is NOT enough “normal matter” like planets and stars to account for the fact that our Galaxy seems to be spinning to fast. In other words, based on the spin of our Galaxy, the planets further away from the center of the Black hole should be spinning off into space, just like a kid sitting on the outer rim of a merry-go-round. https://youtu.be/QIDYhbl-kPA ...... So what outside FORCE, is HOLDING the Galaxy together, and keeping the planets form shooting off into space. Scientists again, call this FORCE Dark Matter. They propose that there is so much of this stuff, that 25 percent of the Galaxy is Dark Matter (70 percent is Dark Energy) and only 5 percent is the stuff we can see. They also agree in 2020, that you can’t see it, can’t taste it, can’t smell it, and can’t even measure it, but they HAVE FAITH ITS there because of its affects on the other stuff in the Universe—a purely Materialistic View of the Heavens—NO GOD ALLOWED. https://youtu.be/daLaQD6_IzE ......So now that I have explained what “Dark Matter” is/isn’t, let me show you what the Bible says. Col CHAP 1 VS-16-17 AMP 16 For [d]by Him all things were created in heaven and on earth, [things] visible and invisible, whether thrones or dominions or rulers or authorities; all things were created and exist through Him [that is, by His activity] and for Him. 17 And He Himself existed and is before all things, and in Him all things hold together. [His is the controlling, cohesive force of the universe.] AMP [Jesus] He Himself existed and is before all things, and in Him all things hold together. [His is the controlling, cohesive force of the universe.] Jesus is the Dark Matter, How did Jews in the Land of Israel, 2000 years ago know this? Divine revelation to the Apostle Paul. It just keeps getting better and better, Praise Jesus.

ALBERT EINSTEIN “DISCOVERED” SOMETHING THAT WAS ALREADY IN THE BIBLE 2400 YEARS BEFORE EINSTEIN. ...... In Einstein’s theory of Special Relativity, one of the concepts that Einstein elucidated in a thought experiment, is the concept of Time Dilation. I will explain the concept in some detail in a moment, and to make the concept easier to understand, I will use three short video clips from Carl Sagan; first up: https://rumble.com/vc7pz1-albert-einstein-discovered-something-that-was-already-in-the-bible-2400-yea.html. In this video, Carl Sagan creates his own thought experiment, with two adolescent brothers and a moto scooter. The observer of the video, watches as the older brother takes off on his motor scooter—and we are left to imagine, that the older brother is riding a scooter that can approach the speed of light. The older brother, rides around the country side for just a few minutes at this speed, but when he returns to the place where he left his younger brother, the younger brother is now in his eighties. So time, has passed differently for each brother, and for the older brother who went on the speed of light trip, he was propelled into the future in only a few minutes. ...... Another example comes from the movie “contact,” a book that Carl Sagan wrote, and his wife produced into a movie: https://rumble.com/vd8tpn-time-dilation-gods-method-of-creation-explained-in-science-and-the-bible.html In the movie the actress played by Jody Foster, has been selected to “travel to Vega” at the speed of light, and if she does this—according to Einstein’s Theory—her trip should take her 4 years, but when she returns to earth, over 50 years could pass on Earth. In the movie, what actually happens is the opposite. The character played by Jodie Foster, goes on the trip, but she is gone only an imperceptible microsecond from the perspective of Earth; however, from her time perspective, she has been gone 18 hours. Consequently, the character in the movie, has a great deal of difficulty convincing a skeptical world, she even left; let alone, believing she had an experience communicating with a being, disguised as her deceased father. I call this the “technology induced vision” that all prophets of God must have had—since all materialists know that “visions” don’t occur—but I digress. ...... Last, but the most important video, is from Carl Sagan’s show the cosmos: https://rumble.com/vb19sl-carl-sagan-time-dilation.html In this video, Carl Sagan talks about two different types of time. Ship Time at the speed of light, and Earth time. The most important comparison in the video, is when Carl Sagan talks about the Ship Time to circumnavigate the entire Known universe (56 years for the Space Ship Traveler) and the amount of “Earth time” that would have passed for those left behind (Carl Sagan says, “they would [BE] 10s of Billions of Years in the Far Far Future” Earth Time). In fact, Earth would have been destroyed by our sun going Super Nova before we return, BUT for the sake of argument, we imagine again, that the Earth is still here. ...... Now what is the conversation we would have, with those people on the Earth? We would exclaim—it is I, the space traveler, one of your ancestors, and only 56 years have passed since I left Earth. Of course, the people on the Earth would claim I was insane. According to our history, that space flight took place Billions and Billions of years ago, and there is no way you are the astronaut that left Earth so long ago. Question: Which group is telling the truth about the passage of time? Answer—Both of them ...... Now—is it possible, scientifically, for two conscious beings to experience time, but at different rates? The answer is of course yes, and our modern GPS system is an example. Briefly, if the GPS satellite system clocks were not adjusted a few milliseconds each day, the system would be off by about 6 miles, each day. Why, the satellites are 12,000 miles up, and traveling about 17,000 miles an hour around our Earth. Time slows down for them by a few milliseconds a day compared to Earth Bound clocks, thus the need for adjustment. ......Now the best part, what in the world does this have to do with the Bible, time dilation, and sheep herders in the Land of Israel 2400 years ago during the time of King David, and 2000 years ago with the Apostle Peter? Lets start with: 2 Peter 3:8 8 But do not forget this one thing, dear friends: With the Lord a day is like a thousand years, and a thousand years are like a day. ...... It is very important to find out what Peter means by this statement, but first I want to concentrate on how Peter could possibly have come up with this statement. As Christians, we of course believe in divine revelation though the holy spirit is one possible way—but my Atheist friends are already groaning. The other possible way, is the Old Testament. In fact, Psalm 90:4 adds a critical component to what Peter wrote. Here is the verse: A thousand years in your sight are like a day that has just gone by, or like a watch in the night. ....... So the first part of the Psalm, basically mirrors what Peter wrote, but the last part of the verse is key: “or like a watch in the night.” So what is a watch in the night—3 hours of time. There were 4 watches each night, for a total of 12 hours. ...... The real question is then, are these two verses teaching a dogmatic rule, or are they teaching a concept? In other words, I have heard the 2 Peter 3:8 verse used over and over again in a sermon, and the Day to thousand year ratio was maintained like a dogmatic Law of some sort. However, when taught in light of Psalm 90:4, the verse is teaching a concept, a principle, that applies to God—in this universe. And what concept might that be?—Time Dilation of course. For God, time is relative. If God chooses—he can spend 1000 of his years, in a space of only 3 hours of Earth Time. Or, if God chooses—he can spend a 1000 of his years in one day of Earth Time. Or (since this is a principle and not a dogmatic rule) if God chooses—he can spend a 1000 of his years in only 3 seconds of Earth time. ...... Conversely, two thousand years can pass here on Earth, but for God, only 48 hours could have past, or 6 hours, or 6 seconds. The truly amazing thing is, until Albert Einstein elucidated his Theory of Special Relativity, ideas like these were relegated to science fiction. Today, this is scientifically possible in this universe. ...... Now, think about the 6 days of creation, spoken about in the Book of Genesis. From who’s perspective, are these days given? Since man is not created until the 6th day—and the Bible says we are still in the 7th day, they must be from God’s perspective. Therefore, if time is relative for God, he can “live” 1,000, or 10,000 or 100,000 or 1 Billion years in one 24 hour Earth day. And, again, conversely, a 24 hour period of time could pass for God, yet a billion years could pass on Earth. Since this IS A SCIENTIFIC possibility, and not simply speculation, this can go a long way to reconcile the young Earth, old Earth debate. ...... Furthermore, think of the Carl Sagan video of Ship Time vs Earth time, and ask yourself, can both time frames be TRUE AT THE SAME TIME—and the answer is an unequivocal YES. Scientifically, all of what I have written is possible, and instead of getting bogged down, on which side is “right,” it is enough to know that scientifically, BOTH can be right at the same time literally. Furthermore, and even more important than all the concepts learned, is the fact—and let me stress fact—both in the Old Testament of the Bible, the New Testament of the Bible, separated by several hundred years, and different authors—a scientific principle (“discovered” by Albert Einstein) was written in the Scriptures. Given the time period these concepts were first written down, it is impossible for these individuals to have learned this information, using “scientific principles and methods.” Instead, this information must have been given to each author—by revelation from a source outside themselves. ...... And now you actually have evidence from the Bible, that God exists, has undoubtedly communicated with his creation, and given its scientifically illiterate authors, information they were incapable of learning in their respective time periods. CLUE: Maybe it has become clear by now, why God wrote the scriptures when He did, and by whom He chose. If God had waited until today, to reveal this Time Dilation idea, man could say HO HUM, TOO LATE. But, give the ideas to a group of men, unable to learn it any other way then revelation, and Gods Word is believable. ...... Did God create the heavens and the Earth in 6 literal Earth days, it’s possible, especially if God crammed a few billion of HIS years into each 24 hour period. In fact, what would that look like if you could observe something like this happening on the Earth? Here is a small video clip of what it may have been like: https://rumble.com/vd16ot-days-of-creation-in-fast-forward-time-dilation.html ...... Or, God could have created the heavens and the earth, in the space of 13.6 billion years Earth Time, yet for God only the equivalent of 6, 24 hour days passed. Both ARE scientifically possible, and at this juncture—I am not trying to take a side. What is of more importance to me, is the fact that, scientifically, both time perspectives, can be correct at the same time. Now, there is just one other Biblical aspect, I want to bring into this discussion. Eternity. Romans 8:19-22 19 For [even the whole] creation [all nature] waits eagerly for the children of God to be revealed. 20 For the creation was subjected to frustration and futility, not willingly [because of some intentional fault on its part], but by the will of Him who subjected it, in hope 21 that the creation itself will also be freed from its bondage to decay [and gain entrance] into the glorious freedom of the children of God. 22 For we know that the whole creation has been moaning together as in the pains of childbirth until now. ...... The fall of Adam and Eve, affected all “even the whole creation all nature.” Before the fall, God looked on his entire creation and said in Genesis 1:31 “31 God saw everything that He had made, and behold, it was very good and He validated it completely. And there was evening and there was morning, a sixth day.” And Romans 5:12 12 Therefore, just as sin came into the world through one man, and death through sin, so death spread to all people [no one being able to stop it or escape its power], because they all sinned. ...... So from these two passages, we see a change in the creation—the entire creation is affected—after Adam and Eve sin. Death, comes into the world at the fall, after God had said “it was very good.” The point I am trying to get to is, Eternity. In other words, before the fall, Adam and Eve were living in Eternity, not in “Time” as we know it today. So, when “God said let there be light” and the Universe was brought into being—the Universe we know today, appeared, with fully formed galaxies. Why fully formed—because there was NO TIME needed for them to form. There was NO TIME needed for the light from the distant stars to travel to the Earth. ...... Since there is NO TIME, before the fall, whatever God creates—takes NO TIME to form period. Each created biological entity appears fully formed without the passage of the “time” we are used to. Our TIME, as we know it, does not exist in Heaven or on the Earth, during the creation. I can’t tell you how many testimonies, I have heard from people who claim to have gone either to Heaven, or Hell, and they say it seemed like I was their an eternity—since there is no time in Heaven or Hell. Eternity, was in operation, but after the fall, Time began, and the whole creation was subject to “decay.” Subject to decay—the second law of thermodynamics is born. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-6a7HFwLoa8 And today, the entire universe is accelerating towards its own “heat death.”

......When talking with Atheists, they almost always say, well "YOU DON'T HAVE ANY EYEWITNESS TESTIMONY," from someone outside the New Testament Documents--therefore Jesus IS JUST A MYTHICAL man. They call themselves, and are refereed to as mythacists. But if you look closely at the mythacist requirement for eye witness testimony from someone outside the New Testament documents--it can be very easy to debunk this requirement. ......1) There are 10 Historical Records, from people outside the Bible, that mention MY JESUS, but it is claimed that they were not eye witnesses to Jesus or his followers--this claim is mostly true, however their may be one exception--more on that in a moment. ......2) Having 10 historical records, from 2000 years ago, is actually a plethora of data--not a lack of it. ......3) Most people who record HISTORICAL EVENTS--do so AFTER THE FACT, and WERE NOT THERE TO WITNESS THE EVENTS--that is why its called HISTORY, or a Historical Record. ......4) However, in this case--it was possible for at least one person to interview eye witnesses of both Jesus, and his apostles. JOSEPHUS: BORN 37AD--died 100AD, Recorded the death of James the brother of Jesus, and Head of the Jerusalem Church, as the authorities had him thrown off of the temple, then stoned, then finally clubbed to death, since he did not die after hitting the ground. SO Josephus--was in a position to interview EYE WITNESSES OF JESUS--including his apostles, AND ALL THESE EVENTS JUST LIKE LUKE DID in the Gosples. ......5) So, they could INTERVIEW witnesses WHO KNEW SOMETHING ABOUT THESE EVENTS, OR READ REPORTS ABOUT THE EVENTS, CONTRARY TO YOUR CLAIMS. It happens all the time. The undeniable fact is--YOU HAVE PEOPLE (outside the Bible) MENTIONING, AND CORROBORATING THE New Testament Documents. Now if Jesus is just a myth, as has been claimed in this thread--then THERE SHOULD BE NO MENTION BY ANYONE OF A JESUS AND HIS FOLLOWERS, much less corroborate the NT documents. ......6) How do I know this is the case---Lets see--Bart Ehrman--who is the leading New Testament Scholar--and not a believer--SAYS THAT THE JESUS OF THE BIBLE IS A REAL HISTORICAL FIGURE. @mOcY. Now what does Bart Erhman base his conclusions on--the actual, credible, historicity of the New Testament Documents, and the Historical Record available to us today. ...... THE FOLLOWING IS A RESPONSE TO MY TALKING ABOUT JOSEPHUS, AND HIS DESCRIPTION OF THE KILLING OF JAMES THE BROTHER OF JESUS. THE ATHEIST CLAIMED "The Jesus quote is a forgery admitted even by all church scholars." In the writings of Josephus--he mentions Jesus and his followers in two separate passages. RESPONSE: A very blatant incorrect statement from you, ...... AND Once again--YOU DID NOT READ MY POST. I did not talk at all about the Jesus Passage. I talked about the JAMES THE BROTHER OF JESUS PASSAGE--more on that in a minute. BUT BACK TO THE JESUS PASSAGE AND WHAT SCHOLARS BELIEVE. I QUOTE: "In the estimation of James Dunn, there is "broad consensus" among scholars regarding what the Testimonium would look like without the interpolations.[5] According to Dunn's reconstruction, the original passage likely read:[5][86] ...... "Now there was about this time Jesus, a wise man. For he was a doer of startling deeds, a teacher of such men as receive the truth with pleasure. And he gained a following both among many Jews and many of Greek origin. And when Pilate, at the suggestion of the principal men amongst us, condemned him to the cross, those that loved him at the first did not forsake him. And the tribe of Christians, so named from him, are not extinct at this day." ...... So--you can have all the best parts removed--all the supposed interpolations. And it still talks about MY JESUS--and fits with the New Testament Documents--PRAISE JESUS. NOW THE JAMES PASSAGE: QUOTE: Modern scholarship has almost universally acknowledged the authenticity of the reference to "the brother of Jesus, who was called Christ, whose name was James"[13] (τὸν ἀδελφὸν Ἰησοῦ τοῦ λεγομένου Χριστοῦ, Ἰάκωβος ὄνομα αὐτῷ) and has rejected its being the result of later Christian interpolation.[14][98][1][15][18] Moreover, in comparison with Hegesippus' account of James' death, most scholars consider Josephus' to be the more historically reliable. ...... Two Quotes from Bart Ehrman--the most famous New Testament Scholar alive today--and NOT a believer in God---Is Jesus of Nazareth a historical figure? 1) QUOTE: Despite this enormous range of opinion, there are several points on which virtually all scholars of antiquity agree. Jesus was a Jewish man, known to be a preacher and teacher, who was crucified (a Roman form of execution) in Jerusalem during the reign of the Roman emperor Tiberius, when Pontius Pilate was the governor of Judea. Even though this is the view of nearly every trained scholar on the planet, it is not the view of a group of writers who are usually labeled, and often label themselves, mythicists. Ehrman, Bart D.. Did Jesus Exist? (p. 12). HarperOne. Kindle Edition. 2) QUOTE: I agree with Schweitzer and virtually all scholars in the field since his day that Jesus existed, that he was ineluctably Jewish, that there is historical information about him in the Gospels, and that we can therefore know some things about what he said and did. Moreover, I agree with Schweitzer’s overarching view, that Jesus is best understood as a Jewish prophet who anticipated a cataclysmic break in history in the very near future, when God would destroy the forces of evil to bring in his own kingdom here on earth. I will explain at the end of this book why so many scholars who have devoted their lives to exploring our ancient sources for the historical Jesus have found this understanding so persuasive. For now I want to stress the most foundational point of all: even though some views of Jesus could loosely be labeled myths (in the sense that mythicists use the term: these views are not history but imaginative creation), Jesus himself was not a myth. He really existed. Ehrman, Bart D.. Did Jesus Exist? (p. 14). HarperOne. Kindle Edition.

1) The Probability Problem of Just PASTA in alphabet soup https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C_rcL6KPezk 2) An Origami Crane, a Monster Molecular Machine, and the impossibility of JUST ONE PROTEIN FOLD. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SLj3q-VTK1s ......None of these items could arise by chance alone. Life EVEN at the microscopic level is just too improbable without a designer. WHY IS AN ANALOGY OF COMPUTER INFORMATION SO IMPORTANT TO THE ATHEIST--AND NOT ACTUAL COMPUTER DATA? ....... You wrote: "and still it did not rain literal square formed floppy discs…… Problem you don't see it can only be a metaphor," ....... Response: and you still don't get that this IS NOT AN ANALOGY, METAPHOR, or simply like something else, as you keep trying to push. Let me explain, a floppy disk, a computer tape--two actual physical devices that Richard Dawkins has compared DNA to--an SDCARD, a microSD card, a Hard Drive, these are all actual, physical devices. They are NOT ANALOGIES OF ONE ANOTHER. These are NOT CONCEPTS, these are real, actual, physical devices that exist, JUST LIKE THE DNA MOLECULE is an Actual, real, physical information storage system. So what do these computer devices do? They store, programs, Data, instructions, algorithms, digital characters, JUST LIKE THE DNA OF THE WILLOW TREE DOES. As Richard Dawkins himself said--this is NOT A METAPHOR. THIS IS THE PLAIN TRUTH, and you Anglemou NEED TO READ THE EXACT QUOTE AGAIN, .......THE exact quote from Richard Dawkins is: QUOTE: It is raining instructions out there; it’s raining programs; it’s raining tree-growing, fluff-spreading, algorithms. That is not a metaphor, it is the plain truth. It couldn’t be any plainer if it were raining floppy discs. Dawkins, Richard. The Blind Watchmaker: Why the Evidence of Evolution Reveals a Universe without Design (p. 158). W. W. Norton & Company. Kindle Edition. .......IN other words, if you read the quote, Richard Dawkins did NOT SAY IT WAS RAINING FLOPPY DISKS. He said and I quote, "if it were raining floppy discs..." THAT IS A BIG “IF”. What Richard Dawkins did say is that 'it is [actually] raining instructions, out there; it's [actually] raining programs; it's [actually] raining....algorithms. How are they being rained down on the countryside--by being packaged into an actual, physical INFORMATION storage medium, we call DNA (inside the seed of a willow tree) . And this microscopic molecule, contains the actual, SPECIFIED COMPLEX INFORMATION, with actual, programs, instructions, and algorithms for building BIOLOGICAL SYSTEMS. THIS IS THE PLAIN TRUTH IT IS NOT A METAPHOR, AND RICHARD IS NOT SIMPLY TRYING TO TEACH A CONCEPT, that you can then take out of context--and make it some wishy, washy, idea you can mold to fit YOUR AGENDA. .......No, Richard Dawkins statement “if it were raining floppy discs,” means that Richard Dawkins believes that DNA, serves the same Information and Storage function that floppy discs do, and IT IS NOT A SIMPLE ANALOGY. .......Quote: DNA is ROM. It can be read millions of times over, but only written to once — when it is first assembled at the birth of the cell in which it resides. The DNA in the cells of any individual is ‘burned in’, and is never altered during that individual’s lifetime, except by very rare random deterioration. It can be copied, however. It is duplicated every time a cell divides. Dawkins, Richard. The Blind Watchmaker: Why the Evidence of Evolution Reveals a Universe without Design (p. 166). W. W. Norton & Company. Kindle Edition ......DNA IS NOT LIKE ROM—DNA is an actual, physical, and specific form of biological READ ONLY MEMORY (ROM) used to store the specified complex information, programs, instructions, algorithms, and data needed to build YOU AND ME, AND ALL BIOLOGICAL LIFE. Quote: The DNA is arranged along stringy chromosomes, like long computer tapes. All the DNA in each of our cells is addressed in the same sense as computer ROM, or indeed computer tape, is addressed. The exact numbers or names that we use to label a given address are arbitrary, just as they are for computer memory. What matters is that a particular location in my DNA corresponds precisely to one particular location in your DNA: they have the same address. Dawkins, Richard. The Blind Watchmaker: Why the Evidence of Evolution Reveals a Universe without Design (p. 167). W. W. Norton & Company. Kindle Edition. ........ DNA—is addressed for information and storage of that information, and the same thing ACTUALLY occurs in computer tape, floppy discs, hard drives, SDCards, and MicroSD cards, USB drives, DVD discs etc. “this is not an analogy or metaphor—it is the plain truth.” .......What really concerns me more than anything else, is WHY ITS so important for the Atheistic Evolutionist, to interject the term Analogy into the question concerning DNA, and the actual type of information it stores? Because of the problem with complexity. Anyone, who has studied the field of computer programming, realizes how exacting that profession is. In order for a program to work at all—each step must be carefully written, or the program will simply not work. As each step of a program is written, it must be tested, and retested, making sure that all the steps that come first, must be correct, before the next step is added. If not, trying to find a simple mistake, inside millions of lines of code, could be next to impossible. .......This type of information (computer programming) meets the definition of Specified Complexity—and DNA is built the same way. Not only is the information in DNA an actual “computer program” that builds a biological system, but it is a medium of storage, information retrieval, and error correction system—the likes the universe has never seen (BILL GATES) And the vast amount of data contained inside DNA adds exponential complexity to the conundrum that Atheists must deal with. So, the Atheistic Evolutionist, must destroy DNAs specified complex information requirement, and pedal, what they always pedal—A Just so story to explain away, how something so advanced, so sophisticated, and vastly complex—that Modern Man cannot begin to emulate even WITH A BRAIN—yet the Atheist, evolutionist claims that a Mindless, unguided, undirected process is the Jeanie in the bottle to perform such a feat. A cave painting—is proof of intelligent design—that a four year old could paint, but the creator of Atheism—a Mindless, undirected, unguided process—cannot paint a rudimentary picture on a wall. Yet, it can build vast libraries of information (each biological system has its own DNA) with a computer storage density that Microsoft engineers can only envy, and it has managed to store it in a microscopic Molecule we call DNA. HOGWASH.

......The oldest known civilization with writing, had both a Creation Story, and Flood story, that mirrors the Bible quite well, and they existed about 5000 BC. AND NOW modern science corroborates this time period with some interesting scientific data. 1) QUOTE: All human beings are 99.9 percent identical in their genetic makeup. Differences in the remaining 0.1 percent hold important clues about the causes of diseases. Article: Genetics vs. Genomics Fact Sheet. Genome.gov September 7, 2018 2) QUOTE: “Around 7,000 years ago - all the way back in the Neolithic - something really peculiar happened to human genetic diversity. Over the next 2,000 years, and seen across Africa, Europe and Asia, the genetic diversity of the Y chromosome collapsed, becoming as though there was only one man for every 17 women. Now, through computer modelling, researchers believe they have found the cause of this mysterious phenomenon: fighting between patrilineal clans. ...... So between 7000, and 5000 years ago, “something really peculiar happened to human genetic diversity.” Oh really—yep, with a 2000 year window, we can attribute the appearance of modern man to one of two events. 1) A special creation of God, Or 2) the Flood of Noah a few thousand years later—take your pick—either one fits the data. I know, I know, for the Atheist, I can see the veins in your neck popping out right about now. And of course—the article SPECULATED by “computer model” what caused this “peculiar” event—but again that would be there evolutionary bias and Just So story to explain the event. Furthermore, with only .1 percent difference between all humans—male and female—not just the men--even the proposed 75,000 year ago bottleneck event, is way too much time. In other words, if the bottle neck event happened 75,000 years ago, there would be more than just .1 percent difference in the human genetic population, by this time. Fact is, the latest scientific evidence shows, that 7,000 years is a more reasonable time estimate for only a .1 percent genetic difference among humans. And since these “bottleneck” events don’t happen often, one must pick the secular evolutionary just so bottleneck story, that fits the data the best—and a 7,000 to 5,000 year old bottleneck story, fits the data, and wins hands down. Period. ...... So, THE BIBLE got it right again, and I have ancient records—from the oldest written language on my side—talking about both Adam and Eve, and Noah’s flood no less. https://youtu.be/X_joHLNYbw4 ..... And now, I even have scientific evidence of a “bottleneck event”—which corresponds nicely to the Biblical Records. It has never been a better time to be a person of FAITH than it is today. Have a Blessed day I know I will.

.......THE ACCELERATING EXPANSION OF THE UNIVERSE DARK MATTER AND DARK ENERGY EXPLAINED .......A commenter wrote "In fact, your bible does NOT explain WHY THE ENTIRE UNIVERSE IS STILL MOVING OUTWARDS!" .......Actually, the Bible does more than that. Now, before I begin to explain, I want this thought in your head. "How could sheep herders in the land of Israel, know something about the Universe, that was learned in the late 1990s by a group of scientists, with Alexei Vladimir "Alex" Filippenko, being one of the scientists? ....... When I was in college in the 1980s, I took a physics class from a professor that worked on the Manhattan Project. At that time everyone knew that the universe was expanding, but what they did not know is 1) is the universe expanding but slowing down and headed for a big crunch? 2) expanding and proceeding at a steady pace 3) or the Universe is expanding, and at an accelerated rate. This is the one they did NOT WANT, or believe to be possible. Why did they believe that number three was not possible--Acceleration. If the Big Bang Happened 13.6 billion years ago, the "explosion" is over, and there should be NO continued force on the universe. This is a purely MATERIALISTIC view of the universe. ....... Yet, all accelerating bodies--even in the vacuum of space need a FORCE to continue the acceleration process. Low and behold, what have they found, an accelerating universe. MYSTERY, what is causing the acceleration? In fact, the universe seems to be violating Einstein's rule that no matter can travel faster than the speed of light. As any matter reaches closer and closer to the speed of light its Mass increases to infinity. YET as Alexei Vladimir "Alex" Filippenko, will tell you today, the distant galaxies are moving away from us FASTER THAN THE SPEED OF LIGHT. Just a few decades ago this was impossible. Today, they now have created an exception--the galaxies are not technically moving--the space between the galaxies is being stretched. Today scientists have a MADE UP term for this FORCE, they call it DARK ENERGY. But in 2020 they have no idea what it is, nor where it comes form. Period. ....... Now the best part for me, Psalms NIV 104:2 The Lord wraps himself in light as with a garment; he stretches out the heavens like a tent. JOB 9:8 NIV He alone stretches out the heavens and treads on the waves of the sea. Isaiah 42.5 NIV This is what God the Lord says— the Creator of the heavens, who stretches them out, who spreads out the earth with all that springs from it, who gives breath to its people, and life to those who walk on it. Psalms 104:2 "He stretches" (present tense, and implying that he is currently applying a force) "out the heavens" "like a tent". Einstein himself talked about space as a fabric, and our God, the creator of the Universe, with one simple phrase, explained what the Universe is doing in 2020 that was only discovered in all of human history in the late 1990s. And the only way sheep herders in the land of Israel 3600 years ago could know this is by divine revelation. PROOF THAT GOD EXISTS, LOVES HIS CHILDREN, and COMMUNICATES WITH THEM. ....... By the way, I just showed what DARK ENERGY is. Now what is Dark Matter, does the Bible have anything to say about that? Why yes. First What is Dark Matter. It is a Force acting in the universe that the scientists of today can see its affects, but they have no idea in 2020 what it is. What this force is doing is quite interesting. Just as our Earth revolves around the Sun, our solar system is part of a vast Galaxy, called the Milky Way Galaxy, and our Galaxy is spinning around a Black Hole at its center. Scientists were surprised to find that there is NOT enough “normal matter” like planets and stars to account for the fact that our Galaxy seems to be spinning to fast. In other words, based on the spin of our Galaxy, the planets further away from the center of the Black hole should be spinning off into space, just like a kid sitting on the outer rim of a merry-go-round. ....... So what outside FORCE, is HOLDING the Galaxy together, and keeping the planets form shooting off into space. Scientists again, call this FORCE Dark Matter. They propose that there is so much of this stuff, that 25 percent of the Galaxy is Dark Matter (70 percent is Dark Energy) and only 5 percent is the stuff we can see. They also agree in 2020, that you can’t see it, can’t taste it, can’t smell it, and can’t even measure it, but they HAVE FAITH ITS there because of its affects on the other stuff in the Universe—a purely Materialistic View of the Heavens—NO GOD ALLOWED. ........ So now that I have explained what “Dark Matter” is/isn’t, let me show you what the Bible says. Col CHAP 1 VS-16-17 AMP 16 For [d]by Him all things were created in heaven and on earth, [things] visible and invisible, whether thrones or dominions or rulers or authorities; all things were created and exist through Him [that is, by His activity] and for Him. 17 And He Himself existed and is before all things, and in Him all things hold together. [His is the controlling, cohesive force of the universe.] AMP [Jesus] He Himself existed and is before all things, and in Him all things hold together. [His is the controlling, cohesive force of the universe.] ....... Jesus is the Dark Matter, How did Jews in the Land of Israel, 2000 years ago know this? Divine revelation to the Apostle Paul. It just keeps getting better and better, Praise Jesus.

A commenter wrote "In fact, your bible does NOT explain WHY THE ENTIRE UNIVERSE IS STILL MOVING OUTWARDS!" ......Actually, the Bible does more than that. Now, before I begin to explain, I want this thought in your head. "How could sheep herders in the land of Israel, know something about the Universe, that was learned in the late 1990s by a group of scientists, with Alexei Vladimir "Alex" Filippenko, being one of the scientists? When I was in college in the 1980s, I took a physics class from a professor that worked on the Manhattan Project. At that time everyone knew that the universe was expanding, but what they did not know is 1) is the universe expanding but slowing down and headed for a big crunch? 2) expanding and proceeding at a steady pace 3) or the Universe is expanding, and at an accelerated rate. #3, is the one they did NOT WANT, or believe to be possible. ...... Why did they believe that number three was not possible--Acceleration. If the Big Bang Happened 13.6 billion years ago, the "explosion" is over, and there should be NO continued force on the universe. This is a purely MATERIALISTIC view of the universe. Yet, all accelerating bodies--even in the vacuum of space need a FORCE to continue the acceleration process. Low and behold, what have they found, an accelerating universe. MYSTERY, what is causing the acceleration? In fact, the universe seems to be violating Einstein's rule that no matter can travel faster than the speed of light. As any matter reaches closer and closer to the speed of light its Mass increases to infinity. YET as Alexei Vladimir "Alex" Filippenko, will tell you today, the distant galaxies are moving away from us faster than the Speed of Light. Just a few decades ago this was impossible. ...... Today, they now have created an exception--the galaxies are not technically moving--the space between the galaxies is being stretched. Today scientists have a MADE UP term for this FORCE, they call it DARK ENERGY. But in 2020 they have no idea what it is, nor where it comes form. Period. Now the best part for me, Psalms 104:2 The Lord wraps himself in light as with a garment; he strethes out the heavens like a tent. NIV "He stretches" (present tense, and implying that he is currently applying a force) "out the heavens" "like a tent". Einstein himself talked about space as a fabric, and our God, the creator of the Universe, with one simple phrase, explained what the Universe is doing in 2020 that was only discovered in all of human history in the late 1990s. And the only way sheep herders in the land of Israel 3600 years ago could know this is by divine revelation. proof that God exists, loves us, and communcates with us. By the way, I just showed what DARK ENERGY is. ...... Now Dark Matter: does the Bible have anything to say about that? Why yes. First What is Dark Matter. It is a Force acting in the universe that the scientists of today can see its affects, but they have no idea in 2020 what it is. What this force is doing is quite interesting. Just as our Earth revolves around the Sun, our solar system is part of a vast Galaxy, called the Milky Way Galaxy, and our Galaxy is spinning around a Black Hole at its center. Scientists were surprised to find that there is NOT enough “normal matter” like planets and stars to account for the fact that our Galaxy seems to be spinning to fast. In other words, based on the spin of our Galaxy, the planets further away from the center of the Black hole should be spinning off into space, just like a kid sitting on the outer rim of a merry-go-round. ....... So what outside FORCE, is HOLDING the Galaxy together, and keeping the planets form shooting off into space. Scientists again, call this FORCE Dark Matter. They propose that there is so much of this stuff, that 20 percent of the Galaxy is Dark Matter (70 percent is Dark Energy) and only 5 percent is the stuff we can see. They also agree in 2020, that you can’t see it, can’t taste it, can’t smell it, and can’t even measure it, but they HAVE FAITH ITS there because of its affects on the other stuff in the Universe—a purely Materialistic View of the Heavens. ...... Now that I have explained what “Dark Matter” is/isn’t, let me show you what the Bible says. Col 1:16-17 AMP 16 For [d]by Him all things were created in heaven and on earth, [things] visible and invisible, whether thrones or dominions or rulers or authorities; all things were created and exist through Him [that is, by His activity] and for Him. 17 And He Himself existed and is before all things, and in Him all things hold together. [His is the controlling, cohesive force of the universe.] [Jesus] He Himself existed and is before all things, and in Him all things hold together. [His is the controlling, cohesive force of the universe.] Jesus is the Dark Matter How did Jews in the Land of Israel, 2000 years ago know this? Devine revelation to the Apostle Paul. It just keeps getting better and better, Praise Jesus.

....... ATHEISM and its HOGWASH Beliefs, Let me Count the Ways. When debating an Atheist recently—I was accused of believing in Hogwash. My opponent, apparently hated my use of the information in the Bible, and called it all HOGWASH. So, I thought it appropriate to create a list of Atheistic HOGWASH. 1) The Universe was created out of Nothing (not a quantum vacuum) and By Nothing. Nothing denoting the actual meaning of the word NOTHING. If Atheism is true, then there is no Uncaused Cause, Prime Mover, or First Cause. However—if something begins to exist—it must have a cause, and that cause must be outside space, time, matter, and energy to cause it to come into being. Otherwise, you are left with a scientific impossibility—Nothing created everything. What is more reasonable—And God Said, or Out of Nothing Everything Comes? By the way, the data shows that it all sprang from an actual Nothing, and the only logical answer is And God Said. a. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z-7ZAb2q0Qg Brian Cox b. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CsRLN5H857s Richard Dawkins c. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oFSMozCz2gw Robert Jastrow d. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HSZTU9-OB7A Allen Guth e. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tYuGrLk1UM8 Borde, Guth, Velenkin 2) After the Universe Began, Life on this planet came from that same Rock that exploded into being OUT OF NOTHING—then developed (evolved) by virtue of a Mindless, Unguided, and Undirected process, to eventually create YOU AND ME. Again, a scientific impossibility, and the definition of HOGWASH. (I refer to these two events as the Miracles of Atheism—without a Miracle worker—yet Atheists claim that Miracles do not happen.) a. All life requires (NOT JUST THE STUFF LIFE IS MADE OF--molecules) no, but all LIFE REQUIRES Specified complex information. In fact, even for the bacteria, the amount of data needed is so vast, sophisticated, and multilayered, it is more complicated than the Space Shuttle, a 747 aircraft, and a Cray computer combined—and packaged at the microscopic level. ....... QUOTE Every living cell, even a single bacterial cell, can be thought of as a gigantic chemical factory. DNA patterns, or genes, exert their effects by influencing the course of events in the chemical factory, and they do this via their influence on the three-dimensional shape of protein molecules. The word gigantic may seem surprising for a cell, especially when you remember that 10 million bacterial cells could sit on the surface of a pin’s head. But you will also remember that each of these cells is capable of holding the whole text of the New Testament and, moreover, it is gigantic when measured by the number of sophisticated machines that it contains. Each machine is a large protein molecule, put together under the influence of a particular stretch of DNA. To get an idea of the size of these protein machines, each one is made of about 6,000 atoms, which is very large by molecular standards. There are about a million of these large pieces of apparatus in a cell, and there are more than 2,000 different kinds of them, each kind specialized to do a particular operation in the chemical factory — the cell. It is the characteristic chemical products of such enzymes that give a cell its individual shape and behaviour. Dawkins, Richard. The Blind Watchmaker: Why the Evidence of Evolution Reveals a Universe without Design (p. 171-172). W. W. Norton & Company. Kindle Edition. b. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=byFKKPflttQ Life began as a Bacteria, THAT REQUIRES DNA, Shortly after the Late Bombardment, THE BLATANT HOGWASH EVOLUTIONISTS FEED TO THE MASSES, So where is the evolution of life? Who wrote the DNA of the first bacteria with NO EVOLUTIONARY TIME TO DO IT IN ON THIS PLANET? HOGWASH 3) Life appears on this planet, in body plans that are fully formed—hmmmmmmmm. Where is the Darwinian Evolution for fist life? Another example of HOGWASH, and the Scientific evidence says LIFE Exploded on this planet. Its called the Cambrian Explosion. a. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iQuG6bQLIAk b. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4uNRpvY4FsI c. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3mflGLOXeJ0 Directed Panspermia—life did NOT originate on this planet—given the FACTS we have in the fossil record. Life was “infused” with DNA on this planet by alien life somewhere in the known universe—OR GOD SAID. d. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xb9HQyDTOK8 Richard Dawkins believes in Directed Panspermia—and Intelligent Design e. What is more reasonable, Life was seeded on this planet, by aliens inside the Universe, And they themselves had to come about by “some Darwinian Means,” or AND GOD SAID? 4) There are two undeniable facts surrounding all Humans alive today—that evolutionists have to come up with A Just So evolutionary story to EXPLAIN AWAY THE DATA. In other words, the Evolutionist has to invent HOGWASH to explain these facts. The creationist does not—it fits the timeline of the Bible perfectly. a. The difference in the DNA of all humans is only .1 percent. Based on the latest secular scientific data (and supposed mutation rates) this would translate into a scientific fact—that the modern human race is between 7000 and 5000 years old. QUOTE 1: quote: All human beings are 99.9 percent identical in their genetic makeup. Differences in the remaining 0.1 percent hold important clues about the causes of diseases. Article: Genetics vs. Genomics Fact Sheet. Genome.gov September 7, 2018. QUOTE 2: QUOTE: “Around 7,000 years ago - all the way back in the Neolithic - something really peculiar happened to human genetic diversity. Over the next 2,000 years, and seen across Africa, Europe and Asia, the genetic diversity of the Y chromosome collapsed, becoming as though there was only one man for every 17 women. Now, through computer modelling, researchers believe they have found the cause of this mysterious phenomenon: fighting between patrilineal clans. Article: Something Weird Happened to Men 7,000 Years Ago, And We Finally Know Why, MICHELLE STARR, 31 MAY 2018” The evolutionist explains this as a genetic bottleneck, because HE HAS TO, to keep his paradigm alive. b. All Humans descended form one ancestral pair of human beings. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MoFydwY_E2Q, The evolutionist in this video, gives his “testimony,” and explains his “religious belief,” of how a woman and a man, living up to a 100 thousand years apart, never met—yet became our ancestors. Furthermore—he ignores the secular scientific fact a. stated above—and explains that Mitochondrial Eve lived 200 thousand years ago. Again, based on mutation rates—that is HOGWASH, AND since the first secular scientific fact is true, his JUST SO EVOLUTIONARY STORY IS, how should I say, is more HOGWASH, and actually superfluous. Why not just go where the data lead? The human species is between 7 and 5 thousand years old, and descended from one ancestral pair of humans. ADAM AND EVE ANYONE, or more Evolutionary HOGWASH? 5) The Requirement, that ALL life depends on Specified Complex Information—excludes the possibility of “spontaneous” life generation. The amount of Data needed, and the amount of time allowed even in the evolutionary standard drivel story—precludes a mindless, unguided, undirected process from being OUR CREATOR. IT again is called HOGWASH a. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6T7d-BlcPR0 Carl Sagan—The language of life is BILLIONS OF YEAR OLD, and so vast it boggles the mind. Where is the evolutionary time for even the one celled bacteria? b. To simply imbibe the idea of life coming about by chance (without natural selection or time) which is what FIRST LIFE REQUIRES, is the most preposterous amount of HOGWASH the universe has ever seen. c. In fact, it can be demonstrated, that the word PASTA would not be generated by chance—even if all the oceans in the world were filled with alphabet soup https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C_rcL6KPezk d. In fact, since all of life, requires not only the information in DNA—but also Proteins—made up of long strands of amino acids—the chance of just one protein folding correctly by chance is 1 in 10 to the 77 power. A probability so large—it will never happen. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SLj3q-VTK1s And that is JUST ONE PROTIEN out of the hundreds, if not thousands needed even for first life. SPONTANEOUS LIFE BY CHANCE ALONE IS HOGWASH when you add up all the probabilities—not just taking into consideration one protein. OH THE HOGWASH OF ATHEISM, IT KNOWS NO BOUNDS.

ATHEIST FAITH STATEMENT ABOUT THE BEGINNING OF THE UNIVERSE IS "I don't know". That is where YOUR FAITH COMES IN, as an Atheist. Today in 2020, the overwhelming scientific evidence we have is that the Universe Began 13.6 Billion years ago, in the Big Bang. Sure we do not know what came before 10 to the minus 37 seconds after the Big Bang WHEN THE UNIVERSE WAS SMALLER THAN A PROTON--but that does not negate the fact that the evidence shows it began. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Blms48a5UDE In fact, before the Big Bang theory, the accepted cosmological model of our universe was the "Steady State Theory." The Universe is eternal. Fact is, the scientific community would boast, “you Christians say God is eternal, well we say the Universe and Matter are eternal, and the Bible is wrong from the first sentence. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XOTwoGCaENk But starting in: 1) 1905 with Einstein's Equations of Relativity and their implication that the universe is expanding. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=25_-6QPRmMc 2) 1919 astronomer Arthur Eddington, observationally confirmed the Theory of Relativity in 1919 3) 1924, Russian mathematician and physicist Alexander Friedmann, realized that the universe, according to the Theory of Relativity, could be in expansion, contraction or oscillating between both. 4) 1929 Edwin Hubble--noticed the red shift of galaxies through his telescope--which again suggested an expanding universe. 5) 1927 and 1931 Georges Lemaître--a Belgium Priest physicist and cosmologist combined the two and suggested a beginning to the universe. Lemaitre, made his prediction in 1927, but was ignored until 1931 when his paper was published in English. (Now take three guesses why a Catholic Scientist was ignored, and the first two don’t count). He is now considered the Father of the Big Bang theory. 6) 1948 Ralph A. Alpher, and George Antonovich Gamow—postulated that if there was a big bang, there would be an "after glow" called the Microwave Background Radiation 7) 1948 Sir Fred Hoyle an English Astronomer, along with Thomas gold, and Hermann Bondi began to argue for the universe as being in a "steady state" and formulated their Steady State Theory 8) 1949 Sir Fred Hoyle, coined the term "Big Bang" on BBC radio's Third Programme broadcast on 28 March 1949, as a term of derision. 9) 1965 Arno Penzias and Robert Wilson accidentally found the Microwave Background Radiation. 10) 1978 Robert Jastrow (an agnostic) astronomer wrote the book called God and the astronomers, explaining the science, and his colleagues all around disgust at the Big Bang Theory. According to their apparent bias, they were rooting for certain science outcomes, not following it. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oFSMozCz2gw 11) 1993 The Steady State Theory hung in there still, until 1993 with the COBE satellite findings, and actually mapping the Microwave Background Radiation. I was a young man at the time, and watched as TED COPPEL (a secular news person) on a program called Niteline, put GENESIS 1:1 on the TV at the announcement. In the Beginning God created the Heavens and the Earth. Turns out the Bible was right from the first sentence. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tYuGrLk1UM8 12) 2003 The WMAP satellite confirmed it again to a greater degree 13) 2003 The Borde–Guth–Vilenkin theorem, or the BGV theorem, is a theorem in physical cosmology which deduces that any universe that has, on average, been expanding throughout its history cannot be infinite in the past but must have a past spacetime boundary. EVEN A MULTIVERSE REQUIRES AN ABSOLUTE BEGINNING https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HSZTU9-OB7A BUT THE MULTIVERSE IS NOT SCIENCE https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q4xOVmjUxLM 14) 2018 the PLANK CMB probe confirmed it again to a greater degree. ....... This is all science (not an argument from ignorance) and even from the beginning of this journey, Albert Einstein fudged his equations and gave them a cosmological constant that would allow for a Static Universe--WHY because an expanding universe implies a beginning--and it sounds to much like Bible. At each step of the way the Scientific establishment has been kicking and screaming into the Big Bang Theory. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z-7ZAb2q0Qg Dr. Fred Hoyle, the champion of the Steady State Theory, is the one who coined the phrase Big Bang in 1949, as a term of derision. And technically it took form 1905 to 1993 for the Big Bang Theory to be considered settled science, and it was, again reconfirmed in 2018 to a greater degree. Now, This is the evidence we have, yet even you do NOT want to entertain the thought that the Universe had a beginning. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=53ThMQ7byQA ....... In fact, you insist we do not know. At this point, it takes more FAITH ON YOUR PART TO BELIEVE THAT. The entire weight of evidence is that at a point in the past 13.6 Billion years ago, all space, time, and matter came into being. Now the laws of logic dictate, that if we have a beginning, we must have a beginner. Otherwise you are left with the unscientific belief that NOTHING PRODUCED EVERYTHING. Based on the physics we know, this is impossible. This is the science we have, and it is on my side. THANK GOD.

THE CAMBRIAN EXPLOSION 3 VIDEOS AND DIRECTED PANSPERMIA ..... It's always a bad say for the evolutionists these days, when their little pond story, is a fairy tale of the highest order. Instead, even the secular scientists realize more and more, that LIFE DID NOT EVOLVE ON this planet. Instead, Life EXPLODED on this planet--just like the BIBLE said it did. Three little SECULAR videos for your amusement--and again, they are form people on your side of the isle. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3mflGLOXeJ0 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iQuG6bQLIAk https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4uNRpvY4FsI ...... In fact, thanks to the prompting of the Atheists on these youtube channels, sending me all kinds of articles about RNA BEING the precursor to DNA, I ran across a very recent article that sheds NEW LIGHT ON THE SUBJECT. Here is their conclusion statement: "Co-author Dr. Jay Goodwin, a chemist with Emory University says "It is truly exciting to consider the potential for alternate genetic systems, based on these analogous nucleotides -- that these might possibly have emerged and evolved in different environments, perhaps even on other planets or moons within our solar system. These alternate genetic systems might expand our conception of biology's 'central dogma' into new evolutionary directions, in response and robust to increasingly challenging environments here on Earth." (DNA is only one among millions of possible genetic molecules November 11, 2019 Tokyo Institute of Technology) " ...... SO LIFE organics, ORIGINATED ON OTHER PLANETS OR MOONS, NOT ON THIS PLANET, BUT EVOLVED AND CAME FROM OUTER SPACE. WHY DO THEY CONCLUDE THIS, BECAUSE AND I QUOTE: “in response and robust to increasingly challenging environments here on Earth.” IN OTHER WORDS, EVOLUTION ON THIS PLANET IS IMPOSSIBLE--AND THAT IS BASED ON THE EVIDENCE AND SCIENCE THESE SECULAR SCIENTISTS HAVE. What makes it even worse for the evolutionist--Just ask yourself one question--which planet in our solar system is best suited for first life in our solar system? Earth is of course--yet these secular scientists need to expand their evolutionary envelope, because LIFE DID NOT ORIGINATE ON THIS PLANET PERIOD. ...... So, today more and more secular scientists, see the Cambrian explosion--and a new find in China--makes it more certain than ever. When a Chinese scientist shared his Cambrian Explosion findings, a western scientist asked him if he was concerned about the repercussions of his findings, and the Chinese scientist says, "in China we can't question the government, but we can question Darwin, while in America you can question your government, but you can't question Darwin." So how exactly did all the major body plans just show up? Why have non theistic scientists, come up with "directed panspermia" like in the movie clip, where the actor Don Cheadle, exclaims "that's it". .......If the fossil record is so complete as you suggest, and the evidence for evolution so sure, then why did RICHARD DAWKINS feel the need to talk about "directed panspermia? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BoncJBrrdQ8 BECAUSE THE FOSSIL RECORD IS NOT AT ALL COMPELLING EVIDENCE. ......It is a wonderful day for a person of FAITH in this country, and based on the science we have. Praise Jesus.

......When talking with Atheists, they almost always say, well "YOU DON'T HAVE ANY EYEWITNESS TESTIMONY," from someone outside the New Testament Documents--therefore Jesus IS JUST A MYTHICAL man. They call themselves, and are refereed to as mythacists. But if you look closely at the mythacist requirement for eye witness testimony from someone outside the New Testament documents--it can be very easy to debunk this requirement. 1) There are 10 Historical Records, from people outside the Bible, that mention MY JESUS, but it is claimed that they were not eye witnesses to Jesus or his followers--this claim is mostly true, however their may be one exception--more on that in a moment. 2) Having 10 historical records, from 2000 years ago, is actually a plethora of data--not a lack of it. 3) Most people who record HISTORICAL EVENTS--do so AFTER THE FACT, and WERE NOT THERE TO WITNESS THE EVENTS--that is why its called HISTORY, or a Historical Record. 4) However, in this case--it was possible for at least one person to interview eye witnesses of both Jesus, and his apostles. JOSEPHUS: BORN 37AD--died 100AD, Recorded the death of James the brother of Jesus, and Head of the Jerusalem Church, as the authorities had him thrown off of the temple, then stoned, then finally clubbed to death, since he did not die after hitting the ground. SO Josephus--was in a position to interview EYE WITNESSES OF JESUS--including his apostles, AND ALL THESE EVENTS JUST LIKE LUKE DID in the Gosples. 5) So, they could INTERVIEW witnesses WHO KNEW SOMETHING ABOUT THESE EVENTS, OR READ REPORTS ABOUT THE EVENTS, CONTRARY TO YOUR CLAIMS. It happens all the time. The undeniable fact is--YOU HAVE PEOPLE (outside the Bible) MENTIONING, AND CORROBORATING THE New Testament Documents. Now if Jesus is just a myth, as has been claimed in this thread--then THERE SHOULD BE NO MENTION BY ANYONE OF A JESUS AND HIS FOLLOWERS, much less corroborate the NT documents. 6) How do I know this is the case---Lets see--Bart Ehrman--who is the leading New Testament Scholar--and not a believer--SAYS THAT THE JESUS OF THE BIBLE IS A REAL HISTORICAL FIGURE. https://youtu.be/jwN9FcVmOcY. Now what does Bart Erhman base his conclusions on--the actual, credible, historicity of the New Testament Documents, and the Historical Record available to us today. ....... THE FOLLOWING IS A RESPONSE TO MY TALKING ABOUT JOSEPHUS, AND HIS DESCRIPTION OF THE KILLING OF JAMES THE BROTHER OF JESUS. THE ATHEIST CLAIMED "The Jesus quote is a forgery admitted even by all church scholars." In the writings of Josephus--he mentions Jesus and his followers in two separate passages. ......RESPONSE: A very blatant incorrect statement from you, ...... AND Once again--YOU DID NOT READ MY POST. I did not talk at all about the Jesus Passage. I talked about the JAMES THE BROTHER OF JESUS PASSAGE--more on that in a minute. BUT BACK TO THE JESUS PASSAGE AND WHAT SCHOLARS BELIEVE. I QUOTE: "In the estimation of James Dunn, there is "broad consensus" among scholars regarding what the Testimonium would look like without the interpolations.[5] According to Dunn's reconstruction, the original passage likely read:[5][86] ...... "Now there was about this time Jesus, a wise man. For he was a doer of startling deeds, a teacher of such men as receive the truth with pleasure. And he gained a following both among many Jews and many of Greek origin. And when Pilate, at the suggestion of the principal men amongst us, condemned him to the cross, those that loved him at the first did not forsake him. And the tribe of Christians, so named from him, are not extinct at this day." ...... So--you can have all the best parts removed--all the supposed interpolations. And it still talks about MY JESUS--and fits with the New Testament Documents--PRAISE JESUS. NOW THE JAMES PASSAGE: QUOTE: Modern scholarship has almost universally acknowledged the authenticity of the reference to "the brother of Jesus, who was called Christ, whose name was James"[13] (τὸν ἀδελφὸν Ἰησοῦ τοῦ λεγομένου Χριστοῦ, Ἰάκωβος ὄνομα αὐτῷ) and has rejected its being the result of later Christian interpolation.[14][98][1][15][18] Moreover, in comparison with Hegesippus' account of James' death, most scholars consider Josephus' to be the more historically reliable. ....... Two Quotes from Bart Ehrman--the most famous New Testament Scholar alive today--and NOT a believer in God---Is Jesus of Nazareth a historical figure? ......1) QUOTE: Despite this enormous range of opinion, there are several points on which virtually all scholars of antiquity agree. Jesus was a Jewish man, known to be a preacher and teacher, who was crucified (a Roman form of execution) in Jerusalem during the reign of the Roman emperor Tiberius, when Pontius Pilate was the governor of Judea. Even though this is the view of nearly every trained scholar on the planet, it is not the view of a group of writers who are usually labeled, and often label themselves, mythicists. Ehrman, Bart D.. Did Jesus Exist? (p. 12). HarperOne. Kindle Edition. .......2) QUOTE: I agree with Schweitzer and virtually all scholars in the field since his day that Jesus existed, that he was ineluctably Jewish, that there is historical information about him in the Gospels, and that we can therefore know some things about what he said and did. Moreover, I agree with Schweitzer’s overarching view, that Jesus is best understood as a Jewish prophet who anticipated a cataclysmic break in history in the very near future, when God would destroy the forces of evil to bring in his own kingdom here on earth. I will explain at the end of this book why so many scholars who have devoted their lives to exploring our ancient sources for the historical Jesus have found this understanding so persuasive. For now I want to stress the most foundational point of all: even though some views of Jesus could loosely be labeled myths (in the sense that mythicists use the term: these views are not history but imaginative creation), Jesus himself was not a myth. He really existed. Ehrman, Bart D.. Did Jesus Exist? (p. 14). HarperOne. Kindle Edition.

.....The Multiverse is NOT Science. It cannot be Proven. It is a way for the Evolutionist, to try and explain away the data that is right if front of his face--namely, the Universe Had a Beginning. If the Universe had a beginning, it must have a cause. And that cause must be outside, space, time, matter, and energy--for it to come into being. However, the evolutionists propose a Multiverse, and a Multiverse generating "machine" or mechanism, yet they have no clue what that would be. In fact, this "mechanism" itself would need an explanation. So proposing a Multiverse, does NOT solve the original problem--it only puts it off one step. ...... This reminds me of a objection that the Atheistic Evolutionist always brings up--"Wasted Space." In the movie contact, the actress Jodie Foster is asked by a young person near the end of the movie if other life exists in the Universe, and she replies I hope so or "it would be an awful wast of space." Oh, but now--who is proposing the ultimate in wasted space? Now it will take literally trillions upon trillions of Universes with OUT LIFE, just to get one like ours? Hmmmmm. It's ok to be wasteful if your an Evolutionist a trillion-trillion times over, but for the creationist, its considered ludicrous to even suggest such a thing. ...... Add to the fact that our Universe is expected to last several hundred trillion years into the future--and even 13.6 Billion years is a drop in the bucket--and plenty of time to take advantage of the entire known universe in that time--even if we are the "first ones."

EVOLUTION OF MAN--AN IGNORANT STORY. TWO SECULAR SCIENTIFIC facts about the MODERN HUMAN RACE. 1) FACT 1 https://rumble.com/vc73px-modern-science-supports-adam-and-eve.-two-people-we-are-all-related-too..html .....So the entire human population, according to secular Scientists who study genetics, shows that the entire human race is related to the same two parents. Well, let me see, where did I hear that story before? Of course, since the scientist in the film is an evolutionist, he gives it a good old evolutionary spin, BUT THAT WOULD BE HIS SPECULATION ONLY. The only real FACT we have from the science is--we all descended from a COMMON HUMAN ancestral pair--yeah, and we call them ADAM and EVE. SO THE BIBLE GOT IT RIGHT FORM THE VERY BEGINNING. Ancient history, across many cultures of the time also talk about the first parents AND I QUOTE: "The Hebrew and Greek accounts are not alone in the literature of the ancient Near East. Mesopotamian civilization and culture are considered to have begun at Sumer, and the Sumerians had a paradise myth, composed in the 3rd or 2nd millennium B.C., it consists of an unmistakable parallel with the Biblical account.2 Likewise, in ancient Egypt, the theme of an original paradise was pervasive." Now add this fact of one man and one woman to the FACT stated below, and the Bible wins hands down period. https://rumble.com/vc740h-sumerian-flood-and-creation-story.html 2) FACT 2 SCIENCE SUNDAY: THE BOTTLENECK JUST SO EVOLUTIONARY STORY THAT HAD TO BE POSTULATED This past week, one of my recent posts really got the Atheists going. It is based on this short secular video clip that I showed. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mTOuAHWshG0. ......In the video, the narrator claims that at some time in the past, the human race almost went extinct. My point then, was that the Flood of Noah was THE explanation for this “bottleneck event.” However, after a week of debate, I came across the true reason why the Evolutionists propose that a “bottleneck event” is so very, very, very (can’t say very enough) important to their way of thinking. Let’s start with a couple of other secular video clips, and then, a quote to bring more information into this discussion. Now, for my Atheist friends—as I always try to do, I have found all my scientific information from people considered hostile to religious thought—in other words, evolutionists themselves. ,,,,,, One of the Atheist commenters to my post—disputed what I claimed (4 human breeding pairs after the Noah flood bottleneck event) by saying that there were “10,000 breeding pairs after the “bottleneck event,” and at the time I did not refute what he said, even though I knew the scientific research showed the number is much lower. In fact, in this first video, it talks about the “bottleneck event”, and they actually discuss the idea of how many “breeding pairs” of humans were available after the “bottleneck event.” https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q31xhg_YVc8 So, researchers believe, that it could have been as low as 40 breeding pairs—which, by the way, is astronomically closer to 4 breeding pairs, than it is to 10,000 breeding pairs. ...... Next up, is another secular video, that not only states that “only a handful of survivors” made it past the bottleneck, but it also brings into focus an astounding piece of information. Here is the video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EMJ9zlNqVgk. Of course, the video GIVES the standard evolutionary claims, that humans have actually been around 6 million years, based on the fossil record. But in addition to these standard claims I have heard since I was a kid--they add THE THEORY of human population bottlenecks. Now please stop and ask yourself, why even postulate human bottlenecks? If the standard evolutionary JUST SO story is true—why postulate human population bottlenecks at all—and it hit me like a ton of bricks. BECAUSE THE EVOLUTIONIST HAS TO EXPLAIN AWAY THE EVIDENCE RIGHT IN FRONT OF HIS FACE—AND THAT EVIDENCE GOES AGAINST DARWINIAN EVOLUTION. In other words—please get this—an evolutionist by definition—already believes in evolution—so instead of following the evidence where it leads, he must explain away any contra evidence to his DOGMA and religion—he must propose another JUST SO story to keep his paradigm alive. ...... Let me explain. Here is a Secular Science quote: All human beings are 99.9 percent identical in their genetic makeup. Differences in the remaining 0.1 percent hold important clues about the causes of diseases. Article: Genetics vs. Genomics Fact Sheet. Genome.gov September 7, 2018. So in the year 2020, the science establishment knows that all humans alive today share 99.9 percent of the same DNA. In other words, there is no evidence, that modern humans have existed for 6 million years as the video suggests. In fact, with only a .1 percent genetic difference between all humans, the human species alive today, cannot date back more than a few thousand years. ...... How can this claim be made—virtually NO genetic diversity—in the modern day gene pool of Human Beings. In other words, the only real hard evidence we have, is that modern genetic studies, and geneticists have to EXPLAIN away the data that is right in front of there collective faces—especially if they are evolutionists. Which means, the only real hard data we have, is that all humans alive today, lack any genetic diversity PERIOD. Of course, the evolutionist’s FIX for this predicament is to propose a human population bottleneck—there we patched up our JUST SO evolutionary story once again. And here is the most important HOWEVER of my post, what does THE EVIDENCE ACTUALY imply—it implies one very important fact—and it is the only true fact we can go on—the Human Species is NOT 6 million years old, or 200,000, or 100,000 or even 75,000 years old period. Well, if the human species is not even 75,000 thousand years old based upon the lack of genetic diversity—how old are they? ...... Lets now bring in some more genetic evidence, in a recent secular study: QUOTE: “Around 7,000 years ago - all the way back in the Neolithic - something really peculiar happened to human genetic diversity. Over the next 2,000 years, and seen across Africa, Europe and Asia, the genetic diversity of the Y chromosome collapsed, becoming as though there was only one man for every 17 women. Now, through computer modelling, researchers believe they have found the cause of this mysterious phenomenon: fighting between patrilineal clans. Article: Something Weird Happened to Men 7,000 Years Ago, And We Finally Know Why, MICHELLE STARR, 31 MAY 2018” ...... So between 7000, and 5000 years ago, “something really peculiar happened to human genetic diversity.” Oh really—yep, with a 2000 year window, we can attribute the appearance of modern man to one of two events. 1) A special creation of God, Or 2) the Flood of Noah a few thousand years later—take your pick—either one fits the data. I know, I know, for the Atheist, I can see the veins in your neck popping out right about now. And of course—the article SPECULATED by “computer model” what caused this “peculiar” event—but again that would be there evolutionary bias and Just So story to explain the event. Furthermore, with only .1 percent difference between all humans—male and female—not just the men--even the proposed 75,000 year ago bottleneck event, is way too much time. In other words, if the bottle neck event happened 75,000 years ago, there would be more than just .1 percent difference in the human genetic population, by this time. Fact is, the latest scientific evidence shows, that 7,000 years is a more reasonable time estimate for only a .1 percent genetic difference among humans. And since these “bottleneck” events don’t happen often, one must pick the secular evolutionary just so bottleneck story, that fits the data the best—and a 7,000 to 5,000 year old bottleneck story, fits the data, and wins hands down. Period. So, ...... THE BIBLE got it right again, and I have ancient records—from the oldest written language on my side—talking about both Adam and Eve, and Noah’s flood no less. https://rumble.com/vc740h-sumerian-flood-and-creation-story.html ......And now, I even have scientific evidence of a “bottleneck event”—which corresponds nicely to the Biblical Records. It has never been a better time to be a person of FAITH than it is today. Have a Blessed day—I know I will.

WHY IS AN ANALOGY OF COMPUTER INFORMATION SO IMPORTANT TO THE ATHEIST--AND NOT ACTUAL COMPUTER DATA? ,,,,,,You wrote: "and still it did not rain literal square formed floppy discs…… Problem you don't see it [the information in DNA] can only be a metaphor," ...... Response: and you still don't get that this IS NOT AN ANALOGY, METAPHOR, or simply like something else, as you keep trying to push. Let me explain, a floppy disk, a computer tape--two actual physical devices that Richard Dawkins has compared DNA to--an SDCARD, a microSD card, a Hard Drive, these are all actual, physical devices. They are NOT ANALOGIES OF ONE ANOTHER. These are NOT CONCEPTS, these are real, actual, physical devices that exist, JUST LIKE THE DNA MOLECULE is an Actual, real, physical information storage system. So what do these computer devices do? They store, programs, Data, instructions, algorithms, digital characters, JUST LIKE THE DNA OF THE WILLOW TREE DOES. As Richard Dawkins himself said--this is NOT A METAPHOR. THIS IS THE PLAIN TRUTH, and you Anglemou NEED TO READ THE EXACT QUOTE AGAIN, ...... THE exact quote from Richard Dawkins is: QUOTE: It is raining instructions out there; it’s raining programs; it’s raining tree-growing, fluff-spreading, algorithms. That is not a metaphor, it is the plain truth. It couldn’t be any plainer if it were raining floppy discs. Dawkins, Richard. The Blind Watchmaker: Why the Evidence of Evolution Reveals a Universe without Design (p. 158). W. W. Norton & Company. Kindle Edition. ...... IN other words, if you read the quote, Richard Dawkins did NOT SAY IT WAS RAINING FLOPPY DISKS. He said and I quote, "if it were raining floppy discs..." THAT IS A BIG “IF”. What Richard Dawkins did say is that 'it is [actually] raining instructions, out there; it's [actually] raining programs; it's [actually] raining....algorithms. How are they being rained down on the countryside--by being packaged into an actual, physical INFORMATION storage medium, we call DNA (inside the seed of a willow tree) . And this microscopic molecule, contains the actual, SPECIFIED COMPLEX INFORMATION, with actual, programs, instructions, and algorithms for building BIOLOGICAL SYSTEMS. THIS IS THE PAIN TRUTH IT IS NOT A METAPHOR, AND RICHARD IS NOT SIMPLY TRYING TO TEACH A CONCEPT, that you can then take out of context--and make it some wishy, washy, idea you can mold to fit YOUR AGENDA. ,,,,,, No, Richard Dawkins statement “if it were raining floppy discs,” means that Richard Dawkins believes that DNA, serves the same Information and Storage function that floppy discs do, and IT IS NOT A SIMPLE ANALOGY. ...... Quote: DNA is ROM. It can be read millions of times over, but only written to once — when it is first assembled at the birth of the cell in which it resides. The DNA in the cells of any individual is ‘burned in’, and is never altered during that individual’s lifetime, except by very rare random deterioration. It can be copied, however. It is duplicated every time a cell divides. Dawkins, Richard. The Blind Watchmaker: Why the Evidence of Evolution Reveals a Universe without Design (p. 166). W. W. Norton & Company. Kindle Edition ...... DNA IS NOT LIKE ROM—DNA is an actual, physical, and specific form of biological READ ONLY MEMORY (ROM) used to store the specified complex information, programs, instructions, algorithms, and data needed to build YOU AND ME, AND ALL BIOLOGICAL LIFE. Quote: The DNA is arranged along stringy chromosomes, like long computer tapes. All the DNA in each of our cells is addressed in the same sense as computer ROM, or indeed computer tape, is addressed. The exact numbers or names that we use to label a given address are arbitrary, just as they are for computer memory. What matters is that a particular location in my DNA corresponds precisely to one particular location in your DNA: they have the same address. Dawkins, Richard. The Blind Watchmaker: Why the Evidence of Evolution Reveals a Universe without Design (p. 167). W. W. Norton & Company. Kindle Edition. ...... DNA—is addressed for information and storage of that information, and the same thing ACTUALLY occurs in computer tape, floppy discs, hard drives, SDCards, and MicroSD cards, USB drives, DVD discs etc. “this is not an analogy or metaphor—it is the plain truth.” ...... What really concerns me more than anything else, is WHY ITS so important for the Atheistic Evolutionist, to interject the term Analogy into the question concerning DNA, and the actual type of information it stores? Because of the problem with complexity. Anyone, who has studied the field of computer programming, realizes how exacting that profession is. In order for a program to work at all—each step must be carefully written, or the program will simply not work. As each step of a program is written, it must be tested, and retested, making sure that all the steps that come first, must be correct, before the next step is added. If not, trying to find a simple mistake, inside millions of lines of code, could be next to impossible. ...... This type of information (computer programming) meets the definition of Specified Complexity—and DNA is built the same way. Not only is the information in DNA an actual “computer program” that builds a biological system, but it is a medium of storage, information retrieval, and error correction system—the likes the universe has never seen (BILL GATES) And the vast amount of data contained inside DNA adds exponential complexity to the conundrum that Atheists must deal with. ...... So, the Atheistic Evolutionist, must destroy DNAs specified complex information requirement, and pedal, what they always pedal—A Just so story to explain away, how something so advanced, so sophisticated, and vastly complex—that Modern Man cannot begin to emulate even WITH A BRAIN—yet the Atheist, evolutionist claims that a Mindless, unguided, undirected process is the Jeanie in the bottle to perform such a feat. A cave painting—is proof of intelligent design—that a four year old could paint, but the creator of Atheism—a Mindless, undirected, unguided process—cannot paint a rudimentary picture on a wall. Yet, it can build vast libraries of information (each biological system has its own DNA) with a computer storage density that Microsoft engineers can only envy, and it has managed to store it in a microscopic Molecule we call DNA. HOGWASH. ......The Probability Problem of Just PASTA in alphabet soup https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C_rcL6KPezk ......An Origami Crane, a Monster Molecular Machine, and the impossibility of JUST ONE PROTEIN FOLD. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SLj3q-VTK1s ...... None of these items could arise by chance alone. Life EVEN at the microscopic level is just too improbable without a designer.

...... In the year 2020, modern science maintains that 13.6 Billion years ago, all space, time, matter and energy exploded on the scene, and between, 10 to the minus 36 seconds, and 10 to the minus 33 seconds, a period of rapid, exponential expansion occurred, which Allen Guth called Inflation. In fact, the expansion was so extensive, that a point smaller than an atom, grew to a size "much larger" than the observable universe, in a trillionth, of a trillionth, of a trillionth of a second, second after the Big Bang. See short video clip here. https://rumble.com/vb1d2d-beginning-of-the-universe-and-the-bible.html. Because of some of the problems, with the Big Bang theory (like the flatness problem, and the horizon problem to name a few) Allen Guth Proposed the Inflation Theory as a solution, and it is the Inflationary--Big Bang model today that most cosmologists hold to. So, very early in the universe, something beyond the physics we know today happened—and again, according to the video clip, all of space, time, energy and matter, expanded from an infinitesimal small singularity, to the size of our known universe. Sounds a lot like Genesis Chapter 1 and verse 3, AND GOD SAID… and Genesis chapter 1 and verse 1 IN THE BEGINNING GOD. Our universe appeared--because any observer besides the creator, would not be able to distinguish between the sudden appearance of something, compared to a universe that began the size smaller than an atom, and grew to a size "much larger" than then known universe, in a trillionth, of a trillionth, of a trillionth of a second. Yet cosmologists, and astrophysicists of today by and large accept this idea. ...... Now, even more mystery is added to the puzzle, because; First the universe expands exponentially to the size of the known universe, in a very small amount of time; Second, in comparison to the Inflation Phase, the universe comes to an almost complete stop—and we do not know what stopped this exponential expansion, nor how long it took; and third, today, not only is the universe expanding, it is expanding at an accelerated rate—after slowing down first. So, why and how, the exponential Inflation phase? Then the astronomical slow down in speed—even if it took 300 Million years to do it? And lastly, the universe kept expanding, and is now expanding at an accelerated rate? So what part of the BIG BANG, seems to follow the physics we know? In other words, what part of the Big Bang seems to be a purely “natural” materialistic BIG BANG phenomena? Yet this is the accepted model in 2020. Allen Guth himself talks about the Big Bang, in this short video clip just ahead—and he is referencing the Microwave Background Radiation, which is the heat left over from, the Big Bang. What is so fascinating about the Microwave Background Radiation is its astronomical, and unbelievable temperature difference across the universe. ...... The BANG, of The Big Bang, was so uniform, that it only varied by 1/50,000 of only one degree, across the entire universe. In the clip Allen Guth explains, no known “NATURAL” explosion (Allen Guth is a Materialist) that we know of is so uniform—either in its temperature range, or distribution of matter—and he gives several examples of other explosions in the clip. See the video clip here: https://rumble.com/vccgur-the-universe-was-created-by-god-here-is-proof.html. Does this sound like a Natural Explosion, or a “controlled” demolition so to speak? So why accept the Microwave Background Radiation at all? See video clip by Brian Cox: https://rumble.com/vhnnur-the-fatih-statement-of-all-atheists.html... What is even more surprising to me, is that the cosmology of toady, actually contemplates ideas that actually invalidates one of the most valued beliefs in the past, and adds an exception to make this “violation” possible. To start off with, watch this short video clip: https://rumble.com/vb1d7x-einstein-no-thing-can-travel-faster-than-the-speed-of-light.html. ....... So according to Albert Einstein, no “thing,” nothing made of matter, not even the smallest particles can travel faster than the speed of light. As any matter travels closer and closer, to the speed of light, its mass become infinite. Furthermore, Just a few decades ago, all anyone really knew about the Universe, is that it was expanding. What they did not know was: 1) The universe is expanding, but slowing down leading to a big crunch, because all of the matter in the universe was pulling in on each other by gravity, and slowly halting the expansion of the universe. 2) The universe is expanding, but at a steady pace—no force needed 3) The universe is expanding, but at an accelerated rate, leading to the Heat Death of the Universe, and a forever expanding universe. ...... Well as it turns out, number 3 appears to be the winner, yet this has raised eyebrows in the scientific community. The discovery of an accelerating universe in the late 1990s by a group of scientists, has rocked the world of cosmology. Why? The Physics we know. Even in the vacuum of space, all accelerating bodies require a force be applied for the acceleration to continue. E.g. If you want your space craft to accelerate from 3000 miles per hour, to 4000 miles per hour it needs more and more energy. Once you arrive at your intended speed, simply remove the energy, and you will coast at 4000 miles an hour (an example of #2 above, a universe expanding at a steady pace—no force needed). Well, if the Big Bang occurred 13.6 Billion Years ago—what is causing this acceleration of the universe today? (By the way—there may be another possible answer to the accelerating universe that I will mention but this is NOT my argument in this article, and that is that the universe could be much, much younger than believed, and still in the acceleration phase of an exploding singularity. AGAIN, THIS IS NOT MY ARGUMENT IN THIS ARTICLE, but a very real possibility). ...... At any rate, today in 2020, scientists call the enigmatic force that is stretching out the universe, Dark Energy, and this sentence contains a clue which I will explain shortly. Today in 2020, it’s a purely materialistic concept, and they have NO IDEA what Dark Energy is, even though they propose that it makes up 70 percent of our universe. https://rumble.com/vb1bk7-dark-energy-is-in-the-bible-even-though-man-does-not-know-what-it-is.html. So, an unknown mysterious force is acting on our universe, to accelerate it; in fact, this acceleration is causing galaxies that are at the edge of our field of view of the known universe, to accelerate away from us faster than the speed of light—seeming to violate Einstein’s rule that no matter in the universe can break the speed of light barrier. So what is a good cosmologist—a surprised, and befuddled cosmologist—to do? I know, lets carve out an exception to Einstein’s rule that matter in the universe cannot travel faster than the speed of light. More precisely, even though the galaxies at the edge of our field of view seem to be traveling away from us at the speed of light, they are NOT. Instead, there is a very awesome, strange, and mysterious force in the universe (the materialist scientists have dubbed Dark Energy) and this mysterious force is stretching the space between the galaxies. See this short video: https://rumble.com/vdi55l-the-universe-is-being-stretched-who-is-the-stretcher.html ...... In other words, the galaxies, are technically NOT moving at all. It is the FABRIC of space itself that today is being stretched, and it is being stretched so fast, that the galaxies further from our field of view are flying away from us faster than the speed of light. In 2020 they estimate that 70 percent of our Universe is made up of this Dark Energy. Now please understand this, this means that this enormous stretching is creating MORE SPACE where there was no space before. More space, which is NOT NOTHING, but is being stretched into NOTHING, where NOTHING here means the classical term for nothing. ( Psalms Chapter 4 verse 2 NIV “The LORD wraps himself in light as with a garment; he stretches out the heavens like a tent) Isaiah Chapter 40 verse 22 KJV..... It is He that sitteth upon the circle of the earth, and the inhabitants thereof are as grasshoppers, who stretcheth out the heavens as a curtain and spreadeth them out as a tent to dwell in, Job Chapter 9 verse 8 NIV He alone stretches out the heavens and treads on the waves of the sea.) Question: how could sheep herders, in the Land of Israel some 3600 years ago know something about the universe—that modern science did not know until the late 1990s? ....... Another conundrum created by this situation is our own galaxy. If the fabric of space is being stretched, how come the space within our galaxy between the planets is not affected? Why does the stuff inside the galaxy stay together at a constant distance, but the space between the galaxies is stretching out continually? In fact, another mystery that cosmologists have recently found, concerns the observable matter (planets, stars etc.) and the spin of our galaxy around the black hole in the middle. By mathematical calculations, and observation, the planets on the outer edge of our galaxy, should by all rights, be flung out into space, much like a kid on the outer edge of a merry-go-round. Scientists have calculated that there is NOT enough “regular matter” to create enough “gravity” to hold the planets and stars in their places. See this short video: https://rumble.com/vdignf-our-galaxy-is-spinning-tooooooo-fast-god-holds-it-together.html ......So, how to solve this conundrum—and of course keep our materialistic only world view--we need to propose another unknown galaxy wide binding force (by the way, the antithesis of Dark Energy, which is stretching the universe apart) and this time we will call it Dark Matter. Why Dark Matter, because everyone knows, that from a purely materialistic point of view, the only thing that could possibly exist to bind the galaxies together is some type of unknown matter, to create enough gravity, to bind the galaxy together, but today in 2020 we can’t see it, can’t feel it, can’t detect it, and can’t measure it. All we see are the effects of an unknown force holding our galaxy together. See these two short video clips: https://rumble.com/vb1ahb-martin-rees-dark-matter-we-do-not-know-what-it-is..html https://rumble.com/vdyx4t-dark-matter-fable-for-grownups-just-to-avoid-belief-in-god.html ....... Today, in 2020, cosmologists estimate that Dark Energy makes up about 70 percent of our universe, Dark Matter makes up about 25 percent, and only 5 percent of our universe is made up of the stuff we can see with our eyes, or even measure. Think of that, today in 2020, it seems as if we are going a bit backward? We only know what makes up 5 percent of our universe. Another question about Dark Matter Particles—why is there NO apparent Dark Matter between the Galaxies holding the Galaxies together? I mean if it truly is just a particle that we have not yet discovered, what is keeping it confined inside the galaxies, if the galaxies are surrounded by nothing but empty space? Like a gas, filling every part of a closed container, if Dark Matter is simply a particle we cannot detect, then Dark Matter should even out, and fill the closed system our Universe appears to be, and bind everything together—NOT JUST GALAXY SIZE OBJECTS. Also, it’s the nature of the opposing two unknown forces we call Dark Energy, and Dark Matter, that has me really intrigued. Watch this short video: https://rumble.com/vdyx9j-dark-matter-our-friend-dark-energy-our-enemy.html ....... So the force we call Dark Matter—is our friend, because it makes galaxy formation possible, and is a galaxy wide cohesive force, keeping the planets and stars in their places. Colossians Chapter 1 verses 16 and 17 AMP 16 For [d]by Him all things were created in heaven and on earth, [things] visible and invisible, whether thrones or dominions or rulers or authorities; all things were created and exist through Him [that is, by His activity] and for Him. 17 And He Himself existed and is before all things, and in Him all things hold together. [His is the controlling, cohesive force of the universe.] [Jesus] is the controlling, cohesive force of the universe. ...... But on the other hand, thanks to an unknown force they call Dark Energy, the entire universe is being stretched at an accelerated rate, ultimately ending in the Big Rip, if the process of energy consumption, and the running down of the universe is not halted. ...... These are mysteries probably left for future generations to solve, but I must admit as a Theist, how the Apostle Paul in the Land of Israel 2000 years ago could say that “in Him [Jesus] all things hold together,” is a mind boggling testimony of God’s word. Praise Jesus