DOES GOD EXIST

THE ACCELERATING EXPANSION OF THE UNIVERSE DARK MATTER AND DARK ENERGY EXPLAINED A commenter wrote "In fact, your bible does NOT explain WHY THE ENTIRE UNIVERSE IS STILL MOVING OUTWARDS!" Actually, the Bible does more than that. Now, before I begin to explain, I want this thought in your head. "How could sheep herders in the land of Israel, know something about the Universe, that was learned in the late 1990s by a group of scientists, with Alexei Vladimir "Alex" Filippenko, being one of the scientists? When I was in college in the 1980s, I took a physics class from a professor that worked on the Manhattan Project. At that time everyone knew that the universe was expanding, but what they did not know is 1) is the universe expanding but slowing down and headed for a big crunch? 2) expanding and proceeding at a steady pace 3) or the Universe is expanding, and at an accelerated rate. This is the one they did NOT WANT, or believe to be possible. Why did they believe that number three was not possible--Acceleration. If the Big Bang Happened 13.6 billion years ago, the "explosion" is over, and there should be NO continued force on the universe. This is a purely MATERIALISTIC view of the universe. Yet, all accelerating bodies--even in the vacuum of space need a FORCE to continue the acceleration process. Low and behold, what have they found, an accelerating universe. MYSTERY, what is causing the acceleration? In fact, the universe seems to be violating Einstein's rule that no matter can travel faster than the speed of light. As any matter reaches closer and closer to the speed of light its Mass increases to infinity. YET as Alexei Vladimir "Alex" Filippenko, will tell you today, the distant galaxies are moving away from us FASTER THAN THE SPEED OF LIGHT. Just a few decades ago this was impossible. Today, they now have created an exception--the galaxies are not technically moving--the space between the galaxies is being stretched. Today scientists have a MADE UP term for this FORCE, they call it DARK ENERGY. But in 2020 they have no idea what it is, nor where it comes form. Period. Now the best part for me, Psalms NIV 104:2 The Lord wraps himself in light as with a garment; he stretches out the heavens like a tent. JOB 9:8 NIV He alone stretches out the heavens and treads on the waves of the sea. Isaiah 42.5 NIV This is what God the Lord says— the Creator of the heavens, who stretches them out, who spreads out the earth with all that springs from it, who gives breath to its people, and life to those who walk on it. Psalms 104:2 "He stretches" (present tense, and implying that he is currently applying a force) "out the heavens" "like a tent". Einstein himself talked about space as a fabric, and our God, the creator of the Universe, with one simple phrase, explained what the Universe is doing in 2020 that was only discovered in all of human history in the late 1990s. And the only way sheep herders in the land of Israel 3600 years ago could know this is by divine revelation. PROOF THAT GOD EXISTS, LOVES HIS CHILDREN, and COMMUNICATES WITH THEM. By the way, I just showed what DARK ENERGY is. Now what is Dark Matter, does the Bible have anything to say about that? Why yes. First What is Dark Matter. It is a Force acting in the universe that the scientists of today can see its affects, but they have no idea in 2020 what it is. What this force is doing is quite interesting. Just as our Earth revolves around the Sun, our solar system is part of a vast Galaxy, called the Milky Way Galaxy, and our Galaxy is spinning around a Black Hole at its center. Scientists were surprised to find that there is NOT enough “normal matter” like planets and stars to account for the fact that our Galaxy seems to be spinning to fast. In other words, based on the spin of our Galaxy, the planets further away from the center of the Black hole should be spinning off into space, just like a kid sitting on the outer rim of a merry-go-round. So what outside FORCE, is HOLDING the Galaxy together, and keeping the planets form shooting off into space. Scientists again, call this FORCE Dark Matter. They propose that there is so much of this stuff, that 20 percent of the Galaxy is Dark Matter (75 percent is Dark Energy) and only 5 percent is the stuff we can see. They also agree in 2020, that you can’t see it, can’t taste it, can’t smell it, and can’t even measure it, but they HAVE FAITH ITS there because of its affects on the other stuff in the Universe—a purely Materialistic View of the Heavens—NO GOD ALLOWED. So now that I have explained what “Dark Matter” is/isn’t, let me show you what the Bible says. Col CHAP 1 VS-16-17 AMP 16 For [d]by Him all things were created in heaven and on earth, [things] visible and invisible, whether thrones or dominions or rulers or authorities; all things were created and exist through Him [that is, by His activity] and for Him. 17 And He Himself existed and is before all things, and in Him all things hold together. [His is the controlling, cohesive force of the universe.] AMP [Jesus] He Himself existed and is before all things, and in Him all things hold together. [His is the controlling, cohesive force of the universe.] Jesus is the Dark Matter, How did Jews in the Land of Israel, 2000 years ago know this? Divine revelation to the Apostle Paul. It just keeps getting better and better for a person of Faith.

EVOLUTION OF MAN--AN IGNORANT STORY. TWO SECULAR SCIENTIFIC facts about the MODERN HUMAN RACE. 1) FACT 1 http://youtu.be/MoFydwY_E2Q So the entire human population, according to secular Scientists who study genetics, shows that the entire human race is related to the same two parents. Well, let me see, where did I hear that story before? Of course, since the scientist in the film is an evolutionist, he gives it a good old evolutionary spin, BUT THAT WOULD BE HIS SPECULATION ONLY. The only real FACT we have from the science is--we all descended from a COMMON HUMAN ancestral pair--yeah, and we call them ADAM and EVE. SO THE BIBLE GOT IT RIGHT FORM THE VERY BEGINNING. Ancient history, across many cultures of the time also talk about the first parents AND I QUOTE: "The Hebrew and Greek accounts are not alone in the literature of the ancient Near East. Mesopotamian civilization and culture are considered to have begun at Sumer, and the Sumerians had a paradise myth, composed in the 3rd or 2nd millennium B.C., it consists of an unmistakable parallel with the Biblical account.2 Likewise, in ancient Egypt, the theme of an original paradise was pervasive." Now add this fact of one man and one woman to the FACT stated below, and the Bible wins hands down period. 2) FACT 2 SCIENCE SUNDAY: THE BOTTLENECK JUST SO EVOLUTIONARY STORY THAT HAD TO BE POSTULATED This past week, one of my recent posts really got the Atheists going. It is based on this short secular video clip that I showed. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mTOuAHWshG0. In the video, the narrator claims that at some time in the past, the human race almost went extinct. My point then, was that the Flood of Noah was THE explanation for this “bottleneck event.” However, after a week of debate, I came across the true reason why the Evolutionists propose that a “bottleneck event” is so very, very, very (can’t say very enough) important to their way of thinking. Let’s start with a couple of other secular video clips, and then, a quote to bring more information into this discussion. Now, for my Atheist friends—as I always try to do, I have found all my scientific information from people considered hostile to religious thought—in other words, evolutionists themselves. One of the Atheist commenters to my post—disputed what I claimed (4 human breeding pairs after the Noah flood bottleneck event) by saying that there were “10,000 breeding pairs after the “bottleneck event,” and at the time I did not refute what he said, even though I knew the scientific research showed the number is much lower. In fact, in this first video, it talks about the “bottleneck event”, and they actually discuss the idea of how many “breeding pairs” of humans were available after the “bottleneck event.” https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q31xhg_YVc8 So, researchers believe, that it could have been as low as 40 breeding pairs—which, by the way, is astronomically closer to 4 breeding pairs, than it is to 10,000 breeding pairs. Next up, is another secular video, that not only states that “only a handful of survivors” made it past the bottleneck, but it also brings into focus an astounding piece of information. Here is the video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EMJ9zlNqVgk. Of course, the video GIVES the standard evolutionary claims, that humans have actually been around 6 million years, based on the fossil record. But in addition to these standard claims I have heard since I was a kid--they add THE THEORY of human population bottlenecks. Now please stop and ask yourself, why even postulate human bottlenecks? If the standard evolutionary JUST SO story is true—why postulate human population bottlenecks at all—and it hit me like a ton of bricks. BECAUSE THE EVOLUTIONIST HAS TO EXPLAIN AWAY THE EVIDENCE RIGHT IN FRONT OF HIS FACE—AND THAT EVIDENCE GOES AGAINST DARWINIAN EVOLUTION. In other words—please get this—an evolutionist by definition—already believes in evolution—so instead of following the evidence where it leads, he must explain away any contra evidence to his DOGMA and religion—he must propose another JUST SO story to keep his paradigm alive. Let me explain. Here is a Secular Science quote: All human beings are 99.9 percent identical in their genetic makeup. Differences in the remaining 0.1 percent hold important clues about the causes of diseases. Article: Genetics vs. Genomics Fact Sheet. Genome.gov September 7, 2018 So in the year 2020, the science establishment knows that all humans alive today share 99.9 percent of the same DNA. In other words, there is no evidence, that modern humans have existed for 6 million years as the video suggests. In fact, with only a .1 percent genetic difference between all humans, the human species alive today, cannot date back more than a few thousand years. How can this claim be made—virtually NO genetic diversity—in the modern day gene pool of Human Beings. In other words, the only real hard evidence we have, is that modern genetic studies, and geneticists have to EXPLAIN away the data that is right in front of there collective faces—especially if they are evolutionists. Which means, the only real hard data we have, is that all humans alive today, lack any genetic diversity PERIOD. Of course, the evolutionist’s FIX for this predicament is to propose a human population bottleneck—there we patched up our JUST SO evolutionary story once again. And here is the most important HOWEVER of my post, what does THE EVIDENCE ACTUALY imply—it implies one very important fact—and it is the only true fact we can go on—the Human Species is NOT 6 million years old, or 200,000, or 100,000 or even 75,000 years old period. Well, if the human species is not even 75,000 thousand years old based upon the lack of genetic diversity—how old are they? Lets now bring in some more genetic evidence, in a recent secular study: QUOTE: “Around 7,000 years ago - all the way back in the Neolithic - something really peculiar happened to human genetic diversity. Over the next 2,000 years, and seen across Africa, Europe and Asia, the genetic diversity of the Y chromosome collapsed, becoming as though there was only one man for every 17 women. Now, through computer modelling, researchers believe they have found the cause of this mysterious phenomenon: fighting between patrilineal clans. Article: Something Weird Happened to Men 7,000 Years Ago, And We Finally Know Why, MICHELLE STARR, 31 MAY 2018” So between 7000, and 5000 years ago, “something really peculiar happened to human genetic diversity.” Oh really—yep, with a 2000 year window, we can attribute the appearance of modern man to one of two events. 1) A special creation of God, Or 2) the Flood of Noah a few thousand years later—take your pick—either one fits the data. I know, I know, for the Atheist, I can see the veins in your neck popping out right about now. And of course—the article SPECULATED by “computer model” what caused this “peculiar” event—but again that would be there evolutionary bias and Just So story to explain the event. Furthermore, with only .1 percent difference between all humans—male and female—not just the men--even the proposed 75,000 year ago bottleneck event, is way too much time. In other words, if the bottle neck event happened 75,000 years ago, there would be more than just .1 percent difference in the human genetic population, by this time. Fact is, the latest scientific evidence shows, that 7,000 years is a more reasonable time estimate for only a .1 percent genetic difference among humans. And since these “bottleneck” events don’t happen often, one must pick the secular evolutionary just so bottleneck story, that fits the data the best—and a 7,000 to 5,000 year old bottleneck story, fits the data, and wins hands down. Period. So, THE BIBLE got it right again, and I have ancient records—from the oldest written language on my side—talking about both Adam and Eve, and Noah’s flood no less. And now, I even have scientific evidence of a “bottleneck event”—which corresponds nicely to the Biblical Records. It has never been a better time to be a person of FAITH than it is today. Have a Blessed day—I know I will.

Watch how God created the Heavens and the Earth in 6 Days: AND from Earth's perspective, it seems that 13.6 Billion Years Past. .......ALBERT EINSTEIN “DISCOVERED” SOMETHING THAT WAS ALREADY IN THE BIBLE 2400 YEARS BEFORE EINSTEIN. https://rumble.com/vb19sl-carl-sagan-time-dilation.html?mref=23gga&mrefc=4 ....... In Einstein’s theory of Special Relativity, one of the concepts that Einstein elucidated in a thought experiment, is the concept of Time Dilation. I will explain the concept in some detail in a moment, and to make the concept easier to understand, I will use three short video clips from Carl Sagan; first up: https://rumble.com/vc7pz1-albert-einstein-discovered-something-that-was-already-in-the-bible-2400-yea.html. In this video, Carl Sagan creates his own thought experiment, with two adolescent brothers and a moto scooter. The observer of the video, watches as the older brother takes off on his motor scooter—and we are left to imagine, that the older brother is riding a scooter that can approach the speed of light. The older brother, rides around the country side for just a few minutes at this speed, but when he returns to the place where he left his younger brother, the younger brother is now in his eighties. So time, has passed differently for each brother, and for the older brother who went on the speed of light trip, he was propelled into the future in only a few minutes. ....... Another example comes from the movie “contact,” a book that Carl Sagan wrote, and his wife produced into a movie: https://rumble.com/vd8tpn-time-dilation-gods-method-of-creation-explained-in-science-and-the-bible.html. In the movie the actress played by Jody Foster, has been selected to “travel to Vega” at the speed of light, and if she does this—according to Einstein’s Theory—her trip should take her 4 years, but when she returns to earth, over 50 years could pass on Earth. In the movie, what actually happens is the opposite. The character played by Jodie Foster, goes on the trip, but she is gone only an imperceptible microsecond from the perspective of Earth; however, from her time perspective, she has been gone 18 hours. Consequently, the character in the movie, has a great deal of difficulty convincing a skeptical world, she even left; let alone, believing she had an experience communicating with a being, disguised as her deceased father. I call this the “technology induced vision” that all prophets of God must have had—since all materialists know that “visions” don’t occur—but I digress. ....... Last, but the most important video, is from Carl Sagan’s show the cosmos: https://rumble.com/vb19sl-carl-sagan-time-dilation.html. In this video, Carl Sagan talks about two different types of time. Ship Time at the speed of light, and Earth time. The most important comparison in the video, is when Carl Sagan talks about the Ship Time to circumnavigate the entire Known universe (56 years for the Space Ship Traveler) and the amount of “Earth time” that would have passed for those left behind (Carl Sagan says, “they would [BE] 10s of Billions of Years in the Far Far Future” Earth Time). In fact, Earth would have been destroyed by our sun going Super Nova before we return, BUT for the sake of argument, we imagine again, that the Earth is still here. ....... Now what is the conversation we would have, with those people on the Earth? We would exclaim—it is I, the space traveler, one of your ancestors, and only 56 years have passed since I left Earth. Of course, the people on the Earth would claim I was insane. According to our history, that space flight took place Billions and Billions of years ago, and there is no way you are the astronaut that left Earth so long ago. Question: Which group is telling the truth about the passage of time? Answer—Both of them ....... Now—is it possible, scientifically, for two conscious beings to experience time, but at different rates? The answer is of course yes, and our modern GPS system is an example. Briefly, if the GPS satellite system clocks were not adjusted a few milliseconds each day, the system would be off by about 6 miles, each day. Why, the satellites are 12,000 miles up, and traveling about 17,000 miles an hour around our Earth. Time slows down for them by a few milliseconds a day compared to Earth bound clocks. ....... Now the best part, what in the world does this have to do with the Bible, time dilation, and sheep herders in the Land of Israel 2400 years ago during the time of King David, and 2000 years ago with the Apostle Peter? Lets start with: 2 Peter 3:8 8 But do not forget this one thing, dear friends: With the Lord a day is like a thousand years, and a thousand years are like a day. ....... It is very important to find out what Peter means by this statement, but first I want to concentrate on how Peter could possibly have come up with this statement. As Christians, we of course believe in divine revelation though the holy spirit is one possible way—but my Atheist friends are already groaning. The other possible way, is the Old Testament. In fact, Psalm 90:4 adds a critical component to what Peter wrote. Here is the verse: A thousand years in your sight are like a day that has just gone by, or like a watch in the night. ....... So the first part of the Psalm, basically mirrors what Peter wrote, but the last part of the verse is key: “or like a watch in the night.” So what is a watch in the night—3 hours of time. There were 4 watches each night, for a total of 12 hours. ....... The real question is then, are these two verses teaching a dogmatic rule, or are they teaching a concept? In other words, I have heard the 2 Peter 3:8 verse used over and over again in a sermon, and the Day to thousand year ratio was maintained like a dogmatic Law of some sort. However, when taught in light of Psalm 90:4, the verse is teaching a concept, a principle, that applies to God—in this universe. And what concept might that be?—Time Dilation of course. For God, time is relative. If God chooses—he can spend 1000 of his years, in a space of only 3 hours of Earth Time. Or, if God chooses—he can spend a 1000 of his years in one day of Earth Time. Or (since this is a principle and not a dogmatic rule) if God chooses—he can spend a 1000 of his years in only 3 seconds of Earth time. ....... Conversely, two thousand years can pass here on Earth, but for God, only 48 hours could have past, or 6 hours, or 6 seconds. The truly amazing thing is, until Albert Einstein elucidated his Theory of Special Relativity, ideas like these were relegated to science fiction. Today, this is scientifically possible in this universe. ....... Now, think about the 6 days of creation, spoken about in the Book of Genesis. From who’s perspective, are these days given? Since man is not created until the 6th day—and the Bible says we are still in the 7th day, they must be from God’s perspective. Therefore, if time is relative for God, he can “live” 1,000, or 10,000 or 100,000 or 1 Billion years in one 24 hour Earth day. And, again, conversely, a 24 hour period of time could pass for God, yet a billion years could pass on Earth. Since this IS A SCIENTIFIC possibility, and not simply speculation, this can go a long way to reconcile the young Earth, old Earth debate. ....... Furthermore, think of the Carl Sagan video of Ship Time vs Earth time, and ask yourself, can both time frames be TRUE AT THE SAME TIME—and the answer is an unequivocal YES. Scientifically, all of what I have written is possible, and instead of getting bogged down, on which side is “right,” it is enough to know that scientifically, BOTH can be right at the same time literally. Furthermore, and even more important than all the concepts learned, is the fact—and let me stress fact—both in the Old Testament of the Bible, the New Testament of the Bible, separated by several hundred years, and different authors—a scientific principle (“discovered” by Albert Einstein) was written in the Scriptures. Given the time period these concepts were first written down, it is impossible for these individuals to have learned this information, using “scientific principles and methods.” Instead, this information must have been given to each author—by revelation from a source outside themselves. ....... And now you actually have evidence from the Bible, that God exists, has undoubtedly communicated with his creation, and given its scientifically illiterate authors, information they were incapable of learning in their respective time periods. CLUE: Maybe it has become clear by now, why God wrote the scriptures when He did, and by whom He chose. If God had waited until today, to reveal this Time Dilation idea, man could say HO HUM, TOO LATE. But, give the ideas to a group of men, unable to learn it any other way then revelation, and Gods Word is believable. ....... Did God create the heavens and the Earth in 6 literal Earth days, it’s possible, especially if God crammed a few billion of HIS years into each 24 hour period. In fact, what would that look like if you could observe something like this happening on the Earth? Here is a small video clip of what it may have been like: https://rumble.com/vd16ot-days-of-creation-in-fast-forward-time-dilation.html ....... Or, God could have created the heavens and the earth, in the space of 13.6 billion years Earth Time, yet for God only the equivalent of 6, 24 hour days passed. Both ARE scientifically possible, and at this juncture—I am not trying to take a side. What is of more importance to me, is the fact that, scientifically, both time perspectives, can be correct at the same time. ....... Now, there is just one other Biblical aspect, I want to bring into this discussion. Eternity. Romans 8:19-22 19 For [even the whole] creation [all nature] waits eagerly for the children of God to be revealed. 20 For the creation was subjected to frustration and futility, not willingly [because of some intentional fault on its part], but by the will of Him who subjected it, in hope 21 that the creation itself will also be freed from its bondage to decay [and gain entrance] into the glorious freedom of the children of God. 22 For we know that the whole creation has been moaning together as in the pains of childbirth until now. ....... The fall of Adam and Eve, affected all “even the whole creation all nature.” Before the fall, God looked on his entire creation and said in Genesis 1:31 “31 God saw everything that He had made, and behold, it was very good and He validated it completely. And there was evening and there was morning, a sixth day.” And Romans 5:12 12 Therefore, just as sin came into the world through one man, and death through sin, so death spread to all people [no one being able to stop it or escape its power], because they all sinned. ....... So from these two passages, we see a change in the creation—the entire creation is affected—after Adam and Eve sin. Death, comes into the world at the fall, after God had said “it was very good.” The point I am trying to get to is, Eternity. In other words, before the fall, Adam and Eve were living in Eternity, not in “Time” as we know it today. So, when “God said let there be light” and the Universe was brought into being—the Universe we know today, appeared, with fully formed galaxies. Why fully formed—because there was NO TIME needed for them to form. There was NO TIME needed for the light from the distant stars to travel to the Earth. ....... Since there is NO TIME, before the fall, whatever God creates—takes NO TIME to form period. Each created biological entity appears fully formed without the passage of the “time” we are used to. Our TIME, as we know it, does not exist in Heaven or on the Earth, during the creation. I can’t tell you how many testimonies, I have heard from people who claim to have gone either to Heaven, or Hell, and they say it seemed like I was their an eternity—since there is no time in Heaven or Hell. Eternity, was in operation, but after the fall, Time began, and the whole creation was subject to “decay.” Subject to decay—the second law of thermodynamics is born. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-6a7HFwLoa8 And today, the entire universe is accelerating towards its own heat death.

A person commented and asked about "the order of the fossils in the geological column" Three videos to question the Geologic Column" 1 ) A trilobite, is an index fossil. An index fossil, is a fossil that is used to date a particular portion of the strata, in the Geologic Column. Well, supposedly if you come across a trilobite, you have reached the LAST layer with any biological material, called the Cambrian Layer. hmmmmmmm, what is a modern shoe print doing stepping on an extinct trilobite? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jjDYaerUIJU How come discoveries like this never make it into the textbooks, and why were the scientists in the video afraid to have anything to do with this find? Its called THE EVOLUTIONARY ESTABLISHMENT'S WITCH TRIALS AND INQUISITION. 2 ) A volcano in the United States laid down over 600 feet of deposits, in only a few years time. https://rumble.com/vccfn5-catastrophe-millions-of-years-need-not-apply.-mount-st.-helens.html, But if the evolutionist had not seen the event--you, can bet that BILLIONS OF YEARS WOULD BE THE EXCUSE PERIOD, and of course the layers would line up perfectly with the Geologic column--because of course they are the authorities, and you must believe what gets published. 3) In this video, a secular scientist is explaining the layers he observes in the Grand Canyon. https://rumble.com/vd131p-grand-canyon-prima-facie-evidence-the-creation-story-in-the-bible-is-true.html Now the canyon is 300 or so miles from any ocean, yet, at the bottom of the canyon, and a mile high--he finds ocean fossils--NOT THE POINT OF MY ARGUMENT BUT I COULD NOT RESIST (FLOOD ANYONE). His explanation for the 8 different layers in the canyon, is the SEA must of covered that area, 8 different times, over BILLIONS of years. But now we are talking about a "local" sea flood, 8 different times. Where is this ubiquitous geologic column at? This would be an example of a "local" geologic column. Also, If one modern volcano can put down 600 feet of deposits in only a few years--why does it take Billions of years for the Grand Canyon--which scientists say was formed by 100 volcanoes? NOTHING IS EVER AS EASY AND AIR TIGHT AS THE EVOLUTIONIST WOULD HAVE YOU BELIEVE--And whenever the science goes against them, they bury it as fast as possible, OR SCREAM HOAX, and attack the finder. EVEN OUR SCIENCE TODAY IS PC, WHAT A SHAME.

THE CAMBRIAN EXPLOSION 3 VIDEOS AND DIRECTED PANSPERMIA FIRST A COMMENT FROM AN ATHEIST AND MY RESPONSE: .......@Yekkt So fully formed body plans--has nothing to do with evolution MY RESPONSE: It has everything to do with your belief system, and the videos describe the Cambrian Explsion as EVOLUTIONS BIG BANG--BUT I BET YOU DID NOT WATCH THE VIDEOS. ....... FURTHERMORE, you cannot explain the origin of life, and the origin of the universe combined--the actual two MIRACLES that Atheists depend upon--but they depend upon them without a creator--a scientific impossibility. In fact, by definition--you cannot believe in a creator or uncaused cause. By definition--you must and do only consider material causes. Me I am free to accept both types of causes and follow the evidence where it leads. At least I have an unmoved mover, the first cause, or the uncaused cause. All you have is Nothing produced a Rock, then life sprang from that rock BY NOTHING--no natural selection at all for first life--then a mindless, unguided, undirected process built the most sophisticated information, storage, retrieval, and error correction system in the known universe (Bill Gates) and did it at the microscopic level. ATHEIST HOGWASH. .......Again another scientific impossibility. Yet you believe my faith in Christ is a fairy tale. Yours is much worse than mine, AND THE SCIENCE IN 2020 is on my side. ....... It's always a bad say for the evolutionists these days, when their little pond story, is a fairy tale of the highest order. Instead, even the secular scientists realize more and more, that LIFE DID NOT EVOLVE ON this planet. Instead, Life EXPLODED on this planet--just like the BIBLE said it did. Three little SECULAR videos for your amusement--and again, they are form people on your side of the isle. https://rumble.com/vd11x9-proof-of-gods-design-the-cambrian-explosion.html https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iQuG6bQLIAk https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4uNRpvY4FsI ....... In fact, thanks to the prompting of the Atheists on these youtube channels, sending me all kinds of articles about RNA BEING the precursor to DNA, I ran across a very recent article that sheds NEW LIGHT ON THE SUBJECT. Here is their conclusion statement: "Co-author Dr. Jay Goodwin, a chemist with Emory University says "It is truly exciting to consider the potential for alternate genetic systems, based on these analogous nucleotides -- that these might possibly have emerged and evolved in different environments, perhaps even on other planets or moons within our solar system. These alternate genetic systems might expand our conception of biology's 'central dogma' into new evolutionary directions, in response and robust to increasingly challenging environments here on Earth." (DNA is only one among millions of possible genetic molecules November 11, 2019 Tokyo Institute of Technology) " ....... SO LIFE organics, ORIGINATED ON OTHER PLANETS OR MOONS ("IN OUR SOLAR SYSTEM"), NOT ON THIS PLANET, BUT EVOLVED AND CAME FROM OUTER SPACE. WHY DO THEY CONCLUDE THIS, BECAUSE AND I QUOTE: “in response and robust to increasingly challenging environments here on Earth.” IN OTHER WORDS, EVOLUTION ON THIS PLANET IS IMPOSSIBLE--AND THAT IS BASED ON THE EVIDENCE AND SCIENCE THESE SECULAR SCIENTISTS HAVE. . To add insult to injury—ask yourself a simple question: Which planet in our solar system has the richest amount of resources for life?—well it’s the Earth of course—but now they say life did not originate on this planet but came form a moon or other planet IN OUR SOLAR SYSTEM. This is a significant statement, because for life to originate somewhere outside of our solar system by only natural means, is absolutely impossible, and secular scientists know this. ....... So, today more and more secular scientists, see the Cambrian explosion--and a new find in China--makes it more certain than ever. When a Chinese scientist shared his Cambrian Explosion findings, a western scientist asked him if he was concerned about the repercussions of his findings, and the Chinese scientist says, "in China we can't question the government, but we can question Darwin, while in America you can question your government, but you can't question Darwin." So how exactly did all the major body plans just show up? Why have non theistic scientists, come up with "directed panspermia" like in the movie clip, where the actor Don Cheadle, exclaims "that's it". If the fossil record is so complete as you suggest, and the evidence for evolution so sure, then why did RICHARD DAWKINS feel the need to talk about "directed panspermia? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xb9HQyDTOK8 .......BECAUSE THE FOSSIL RECORD IS NOT AT ALL COMPELLING EVIDENCE.

A person commented and asked about "the order of the fossils in the geological column" Three videos to question the Geologic Column" 1) In this video, a secular scientist is explaining the layers he observes in the Grand Canyon. https://rumble.com/vd131p-grand-canyon-prima-facie-evidence-the-creation-story-in-the-bible-is-true.html Now the canyon is 300 or so miles from any ocean, yet, at the bottom of the canyon, and a mile high--he finds ocean fossils--NOT THE POINT OF MY ARGUMENT BUT I COULD NOT RESIST (FLOOD ANYONE). His explanation for the 8 different layers in the canyon, is the SEA must of covered that area, 8 different times, over BILLIONS of years. But now we are talking about a "local" sea flood, 8 different times. Where is this ubiquitous geologic column at? This would be an example of a "local" geologic column. Also, If one modern volcano (SEE VIDEO LISTED UNDER NUMBER 2) can put down 600 feet of deposits in only a few years--why does it take Billions of years for the Grand Canyon--which scientists say was formed by 100 volcanoes? 2) One volcano in the United States laid down over 600 feet of deposits, in only a few years time. https://rumble.com/vccfn5-catastrophe-millions-of-years-need-not-apply.-mount-st.-helens.html, But if the evolutionist had not seen the event--you can bet that BILLIONS OF YEARS WOULD BE THE EXCUSE PERIOD, and of course the layers would line up perfectly with the Geologic column--because of course they are the authorities, and you must believe what gets published. 3) A trilobite, is an index fossil. An index fossil, is a fossil that is used to date a particular portion of the strata, in the Geologic Column. Well, supposedly if you come across a trilobite, you have reached the LAST layer with any biological material, called the Cambrian Layer. hmmmmmmm, what is a modern shoe print doing stepping on an extinct trilobite? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jjDYaerUIJU How come discoveries like this never make it into the textbooks, and why were the scientists in the video afraid to have anything to do with this find? Its called THE EVOLUTIONARY ESTABLISHMENT'S WITCH TRIALS AND INQUISITION. NOTHING IS EVER AS EASY AND AIR TIGHT AS THE EVOLUTIONIST WOULD HAVE YOU BELIEVE--And whenever the science goes against them, they bury it as fast as possible, OR SCREAM HOAX, and attack the finder.

.......A PERSON COMMENTED "DNA doesn;t have "lines of code", it is nothing like a computer program.....That is nothing magical, it is simply chemistry" .......My RESPONSE: And your conclusion is total nonsense. THE REAL QUESTION--IS WHY CAN RICHARD DAWKINS SEE IT, BUT YOU REFUSE TOO? Especially the part about it JUST BEING CHEMISTRY--THAT IS A TOTAL MISUNDERSTANDING OF DNA. The high Priest of Atheism disagrees with you and I QUOTE: It is raining instructions out there; it’s raining programs; it’s raining tree-growing, fluff-spreading, algorithms. That is not a metaphor, it is the plain truth. It couldn’t be any plainer if it were raining floppy discs." Dawkins, Richard. The Blind Watchmaker: Why the Evidence of Evolution Reveals a Universe without Design (p. 158). W. W. Norton & Company. Kindle Edition. RICHARD DAWKINS SAYS "THIS IS NOT A METAPHOR--SYNONYM FOR ANALOGY--IT IS THE PLAIN TRUTH. I QUOTE AGAIN: ....... DNA is ROM. It can be read millions of times over, but only written to once — when it is first assembled at the birth of the cell in which it resides. The DNA in the cells of any individual is ‘burned in’, and is never altered during that individual’s lifetime, except by very rare random deterioration. It can be copied, however. It is duplicated every time a cell divides. Dawkins, Richard. The Blind Watchmaker: Why the Evidence of Evolution Reveals a Universe without Design (p. 166). W. W. Norton & Company. Kindle Edition. SO DNA IS EXACTLY LIKE COMPUTER CODE ACCORDING TO RICHARD DAWKINS. AND I QUOTE AGAIN, ....... There is nothing special about the substances from which living things are made. Living things are collections of molecules, like everything else. What is special is that these molecules are put together in much more complicated patterns than the molecules of nonliving things, and this putting together is done by following programs, sets of instructions for how to develop, which the organisms carry around inside themselves. Dawkins, Richard. The Blind Watchmaker: Why the Evidence of Evolution Reveals a Universe without Design (pp. 158-159). W. W. Norton & Company. Kindle Edition. FOLLOWING SETS OF COMPUTER PROGRAMS, INSTRUCTIONS. AND I QUOTE AGAIN: ....... There is enough storage capacity in the DNA of a single lily seed or a single salamander sperm to store the Encyclopaedia Britannica 60 times over. Some species of the unjustly called ‘primitive’ amoebas have as much information in their DNA as 1,000 Encyclopaedia Britannicas. Dawkins, Richard. The Blind Watchmaker: Why the Evidence of Evolution Reveals a Universe without Design (p. 164). W. W. Norton & Company. Kindle Edition. THE REAL QUESTION--IS WHY CAN RICHARD DAWKINS SEE IT, BUT YOU REFUSE TOO? .......So, you can stop kidding yourself now. AND THE SCIENCE IS ON MY SIDE THANK GOD.

THE CAMBRIAN EXPLOSION 3 VIDEOS AND DIRECTED PANSPERMIA ....... It's always a bad say for the evolutionists these days, when their little pond story, is a fairy tale of the highest order. Instead, even the secular scientists realize more and more, that LIFE DID NOT EVOLVE ON this planet. Instead, Life EXPLODED on this planet--just like the BIBLE said it did. Three little SECULAR videos for your amusement--and again, they are form people on your side of the isle. https://rumble.com/vd11x9-proof-of-gods-design-the-cambrian-explosion.html https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iQuG6bQLIAk https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4uNRpvY4FsI ....... In fact, thanks to the prompting of the Atheists on these youtube channels, sending me all kinds of articles about RNA BEING the precursor to DNA, I ran across a very recent article that sheds NEW LIGHT ON THE SUBJECT. Here is their conclusion statement: "Co-author Dr. Jay Goodwin, a chemist with Emory University says "It is truly exciting to consider the potential for alternate genetic systems, based on these analogous nucleotides -- that these might possibly have emerged and evolved in different environments, perhaps even on other planets or moons within our solar system. These alternate genetic systems might expand our conception of biology's 'central dogma' into new evolutionary directions, in response and robust to increasingly challenging environments here on Earth." (DNA is only one among millions of possible genetic molecules November 11, 2019 Tokyo Institute of Technology) " ....... SO LIFE organics, ORIGINATED ON OTHER PLANETS OR MOONS, NOT ON THIS PLANET, BUT EVOLVED AND CAME FROM OUTER SPACE. WHY DO THEY CONCLUDE THIS, BECAUSE AND I QUOTE: “in response and robust to increasingly challenging environments here on Earth.” IN OTHER WORDS, EVOLUTION ON THIS PLANET IS IMPOSSIBLE--AND THAT IS BASED ON THE EVIDENCE AND SCIENCE THESE SECULAR SCIENTISTS HAVE. What makes it even worse for the evolutionist--Just ask yourself one question--which planet in our solar system is best suited for first life in our solar system? Earth is of course--yet these secular scientists need to expand their evolutionary envelope, because LIFE DID NOT ORIGINATE ON THIS PLANET PERIOD. ....... So, today more and more secular scientists, see the Cambrian explosion--and a new find in China--makes it more certain than ever. When a Chinese scientist shared his Cambrian Explosion findings, a western scientist asked him if he was concerned about the repercussions of his findings, and the Chinese scientist says, "in China we can't question the government, but we can question Darwin, while in America you can question your government, but you can't question Darwin." So how exactly did all the major body plans just show up? Why have non theistic scientists, come up with "directed panspermia" like in the movie clip, where the actor Don Cheadle, exclaims "that's it". If the fossil record is so complete as you suggest, and the evidence for evolution so sure, then why did RICHARD DAWKINS feel the need to talk about "directed panspermia? https://rumble.com/vc76qb-richard-dawkins-believes-in-intelligent-design-jut-not-god.html. BECAUSE THE FOSSIL RECORD IS NOT AT ALL COMPELLING EVIDENCE. ....... It is a wonderful day for a person of FAITH in this country, and based on the science we have. Awesome God

MAN ALMOST WENT EXTINCT—WHERE HAVE I HEARD THAT BEFORE? ......Watch this short secular video clip first: https://rumble.com/vdjc17-four-secular-scientific-facts-that-refute-darwinian-evolution.html ...... I must thank all of you that keep sending me Atheistic, evolutionary articles, because they contain clues that keep backing up the Biblical Stories. For instance, in a recent article someone sent, is the following Quote: “An alternative is that dumb luck allowed the 46 chromosome humans to win. Perhaps people with 46 chromosomes were in an isolated community somewhere and the rest of humanity was wiped out. Certainly humanity has had near death experiences before. The most recent one was probably 75,000 or so years ago.” ...... Just like the video I included at the beginning of this post, the article says that man almost went extinct—BUT THEY DON’T KNOW HOW—and when they include the word Probably in the quote—THEY DON’T KNOW WHEN. How do they know this—genetic studies. Now, again, the only fact we can go on, is that once the Human Species arrived, sometime later it almost went extinct. NOW WHERE HAVE I HEARD THIS STORY BEFORE? Hmmmmmm let me see. It has something to do with 4 couples, living through a “bottle neck” event. Oh that’s right the Bible got it right again. Seems like there was once a worldwide flood (and this secular video suggests there could have been just that: https://rumble.com/vd131p-grand-canyon-prima-facie-evidence-the-creation-story-in-the-bible-is-true.html. .. And this next video gives credence to my claim about the previous video, as it factually states that 600 feet of deposits can be put down by one volcano—now just think what a worldwide flood could do. https://rumble.com/vc7ay9-the-geologic-column-in-only-3-years-what.html. ....... Oh, and the best of all, is that all ancient cultures record such an event, and I quote: “The Sumerian Epic of Gilgamesh dates back nearly 5,000 years and is thought to be perhaps the oldest written tale on the planet…..Myriad ancient cultures have their own legends of watery cataclysm and salvation. According to Vedic lore......An Aztec story sees a devout couple hide in the hollow of a vast tree with two ears of corn as divine storms drown the wicked of the land. Creation myths from Egypt to Scandinavia involve tidal floods of all sorts of substances — including the blood of deities — purging and remaking the earth…. Flood myths are so universal that the Hungarian psychoanalyst Geza Roheim thought their origins were physiological, not historical. TIME MAGAZINE Before Noah: Myths of the Flood Are Far Older Than the Bible” In fact, Hollywood has recently released a movie about the Flood, but the producers admit they used the Babylonian version. https://rumble.com/vd107r-the-babylonian-noah.html. ....... So lets see, we have genetic evidence that all humans almost went extinct. We have evidence from the Grand Canyon—that it was covered at one time by the sea, up to over a mile high. We have evidence form Mount St. Helens that one volcano can put down 600 feet of deposits in a very short period of time. And we have written records from all ancient cultures (NOT JUST ONE RELIGIOUS SECT) about a world wide flood. And of course we have the Biblical Narrative. The Bible got it right again. It has never been a better time to be a person of Faith than it is today. Praise Jesus.

.......The Probability Problem of Just PASTA in alphabet soup https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C_rcL6KPezk .......An Origami Crane, a Monster Molecular Machine, and the impossibility of JUST ONE PROTEIN FOLD. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SLj3q-VTK1s .......None of these items could arise by chance alone. Life EVEN at the microscopic level is just too improbable without a designer. WHY IS AN ANALOGY OF COMPUTER INFORMATION SO IMPORTANT TO THE ATHEIST--AND NOT ACTUAL COMPUTER DATA? ....... You wrote: "and still it did not rain literal square formed floppy discs…… Problem you don't see it can only be a metaphor," ....... Response: and you still don't get that this IS NOT AN ANALOGY, METAPHOR, or simply like something else, as you keep trying to push. Let me explain, a floppy disk, a computer tape--two actual physical devices that Richard Dawkins has compared DNA to--an SDCARD, a microSD card, a Hard Drive, these are all actual, physical devices. They are NOT ANALOGIES OF ONE ANOTHER. These are NOT CONCEPTS, these are real, actual, physical devices that exist, JUST LIKE THE DNA MOLECULE is an Actual, real, physical information storage system. So what do these computer devices do? They store, programs, Data, instructions, algorithms, digital characters, JUST LIKE THE DNA OF THE WILLOW TREE DOES. As Richard Dawkins himself said--this is NOT A METAPHOR. THIS IS THE PLAIN TRUTH, and you Anglemou NEED TO READ THE EXACT QUOTE AGAIN, .......THE exact quote from Richard Dawkins is: QUOTE: It is raining instructions out there; it’s raining programs; it’s raining tree-growing, fluff-spreading, algorithms. That is not a metaphor, it is the plain truth. It couldn’t be any plainer if it were raining floppy discs. Dawkins, Richard. The Blind Watchmaker: Why the Evidence of Evolution Reveals a Universe without Design (p. 158). W. W. Norton & Company. Kindle Edition. .......IN other words, if you read the quote, Richard Dawkins did NOT SAY IT WAS RAINING FLOPPY DISKS. He said and I quote, "if it were raining floppy discs..." THAT IS A BIG “IF”. What Richard Dawkins did say is that 'it is [actually] raining instructions, out there; it's [actually] raining programs; it's [actually] raining....algorithms. How are they being rained down on the countryside--by being packaged into an actual, physical INFORMATION storage medium, we call DNA (inside the seed of a willow tree) . And this microscopic molecule, contains the actual, SPECIFIED COMPLEX INFORMATION, with actual, programs, instructions, and algorithms for building BIOLOGICAL SYSTEMS. THIS IS THE PLAIN TRUTH IT IS NOT A METAPHOR, AND RICHARD IS NOT SIMPLY TRYING TO TEACH A CONCEPT, that you can then take out of context--and make it some wishy, washy, idea you can mold to fit YOUR AGENDA. .......No, Richard Dawkins statement “if it were raining floppy discs,” means that Richard Dawkins believes that DNA, serves the same Information and Storage function that floppy discs do, and IT IS NOT A SIMPLE ANALOGY. .......Quote: DNA is ROM. It can be read millions of times over, but only written to once — when it is first assembled at the birth of the cell in which it resides. The DNA in the cells of any individual is ‘burned in’, and is never altered during that individual’s lifetime, except by very rare random deterioration. It can be copied, however. It is duplicated every time a cell divides. Dawkins, Richard. The Blind Watchmaker: Why the Evidence of Evolution Reveals a Universe without Design (p. 166). W. W. Norton & Company. Kindle Edition .......DNA IS NOT LIKE ROM—DNA is an actual, physical, and specific form of biological READ ONLY MEMORY (ROM) used to store the specified complex information, programs, instructions, algorithms, and data needed to build YOU AND ME, AND ALL BIOLOGICAL LIFE. Quote: The DNA is arranged along stringy chromosomes, like long computer tapes. All the DNA in each of our cells is addressed in the same sense as computer ROM, or indeed computer tape, is addressed. The exact numbers or names that we use to label a given address are arbitrary, just as they are for computer memory. What matters is that a particular location in my DNA corresponds precisely to one particular location in your DNA: they have the same address. Dawkins, Richard. The Blind Watchmaker: Why the Evidence of Evolution Reveals a Universe without Design (p. 167). W. W. Norton & Company. Kindle Edition. .......DNA—is addressed for information and storage of that information, and the same thing ACTUALLY occurs in computer tape, floppy discs, hard drives, SDCards, and MicroSD cards, USB drives, DVD discs etc. “this is not an analogy or metaphor—it is the plain truth.” .......What really concerns me more than anything else, is WHY ITS so important for the Atheistic Evolutionist, to interject the term Analogy into the question concerning DNA, and the actual type of information it stores? Because of the problem with complexity. Anyone, who has studied the field of computer programming, realizes how exacting that profession is. In order for a program to work at all—each step must be carefully written, or the program will simply not work. As each step of a program is written, it must be tested, and retested, making sure that all the steps that come first, must be correct, before the next step is added. If not, trying to find a simple mistake, inside millions of lines of code, could be next to impossible. .......This type of information (computer programming) meets the definition of Specified Complexity—and DNA is built the same way. Not only is the information in DNA an actual “computer program” that builds a biological system, but it is a medium of storage, information retrieval, and error correction system—the likes the universe has never seen (BILL GATES) And the vast amount of data contained inside DNA adds exponential complexity to the conundrum that Atheists must deal with. So, the Atheistic Evolutionist, must destroy DNAs specified complex information requirement, and pedal, what they always pedal—A Just so story to explain away, how something so advanced, so sophisticated, and vastly complex—that Modern Man cannot begin to emulate even WITH A BRAIN—yet the Atheist, evolutionist claims that a Mindless, unguided, undirected process is the Jeanie in the bottle to perform such a feat. A cave painting—is proof of intelligent design—that a four year old could paint, but the creator of Atheism—a Mindless, undirected, unguided process—cannot paint a rudimentary picture on a wall. Yet, it can build vast libraries of information (each biological system has its own DNA) with a computer storage density that Microsoft engineers can only envy, and it has managed to store it in a microscopic Molecule we call DNA. HOGWASH THAT EVOLUTIONISTS LOVE.

Scientific Discoveries, that destroy Evolution, and the geologic column. Scientific evidence that MODERN man lived with the dinosaur.

.......The Probability Problem of Just PASTA in alphabet soup https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C_rcL6KPezk .......An Origami Crane, a Monster Molecular Machine, and the impossibility of JUST ONE PROTEIN FOLD. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SLj3q-VTK1s ....... None of these items could arise by chance alone. Life EVEN at the microscopic level is just too improbable without a designer. WHY IS AN ANALOGY OF COMPUTER INFORMATION SO IMPORTANT TO THE ATHEIST--AND NOT ACTUAL COMPUTER DATA? ....... You wrote: "and still it did not rain literal square formed floppy discs…… Problem you don't see it can only be a metaphor," ....... Response: and you still don't get that this IS NOT AN ANALOGY, METAPHOR, or simply like something else, as you keep trying to push. Let me explain, a floppy disk, a computer tape--two actual physical devices that Richard Dawkins has compared DNA to--an SDCARD, a microSD card, a Hard Drive, these are all actual, physical devices. They are NOT ANALOGIES OF ONE ANOTHER. These are NOT CONCEPTS, these are real, actual, physical devices that exist, JUST LIKE THE DNA MOLECULE is an Actual, real, physical information storage system. So what do these computer devices do? They store, programs, Data, instructions, algorithms, digital characters, JUST LIKE THE DNA OF THE WILLOW TREE DOES. As Richard Dawkins himself said--this is NOT A METAPHOR. THIS IS THE PLAIN TRUTH, and you Anglemou NEED TO READ THE EXACT QUOTE AGAIN, ....... THE exact quote from Richard Dawkins is: QUOTE: It is raining instructions out there; it’s raining programs; it’s raining tree-growing, fluff-spreading, algorithms. That is not a metaphor, it is the plain truth. It couldn’t be any plainer if it were raining floppy discs. Dawkins, Richard. The Blind Watchmaker: Why the Evidence of Evolution Reveals a Universe without Design (p. 158). W. W. Norton & Company. Kindle Edition. ....... IN other words, if you read the quote, Richard Dawkins did NOT SAY IT WAS RAINING FLOPPY DISKS. He said and I quote, "if it were raining floppy discs..." THAT IS A BIG “IF”. What Richard Dawkins did say is that 'it is [actually] raining instructions, out there; it's [actually] raining programs; it's [actually] raining....algorithms. How are they being rained down on the countryside--by being packaged into an actual, physical INFORMATION storage medium, we call DNA (inside the seed of a willow tree) . And this microscopic molecule, contains the actual, SPECIFIED COMPLEX INFORMATION, with actual, programs, instructions, and algorithms for building BIOLOGICAL SYSTEMS. THIS IS THE PLAIN TRUTH IT IS NOT A METAPHOR, AND RICHARD IS NOT SIMPLY TRYING TO TEACH A CONCEPT, that you can then take out of context--and make it some wishy, washy, idea you can mold to fit YOUR AGENDA. ....... No, Richard Dawkins statement “if it were raining floppy discs,” means that Richard Dawkins believes that DNA, serves the same Information and Storage function that floppy discs do, and IT IS NOT A SIMPLE ANALOGY. ....... Quote: DNA is ROM. It can be read millions of times over, but only written to once — when it is first assembled at the birth of the cell in which it resides. The DNA in the cells of any individual is ‘burned in’, and is never altered during that individual’s lifetime, except by very rare random deterioration. It can be copied, however. It is duplicated every time a cell divides. Dawkins, Richard. The Blind Watchmaker: Why the Evidence of Evolution Reveals a Universe without Design (p. 166). W. W. Norton & Company. Kindle Edition ....... DNA IS NOT LIKE ROM—DNA is an actual, physical, and specific form of biological READ ONLY MEMORY (ROM) used to store the specified complex information, programs, instructions, algorithms, and data needed to build YOU AND ME, AND ALL BIOLOGICAL LIFE. Quote: The DNA is arranged along stringy chromosomes, like long computer tapes. All the DNA in each of our cells is addressed in the same sense as computer ROM, or indeed computer tape, is addressed. The exact numbers or names that we use to label a given address are arbitrary, just as they are for computer memory. What matters is that a particular location in my DNA corresponds precisely to one particular location in your DNA: they have the same address. Dawkins, Richard. The Blind Watchmaker: Why the Evidence of Evolution Reveals a Universe without Design (p. 167). W. W. Norton & Company. Kindle Edition. ....... DNA—is addressed for information and storage of that information, and the same thing ACTUALLY occurs in computer tape, floppy discs, hard drives, SDCards, and MicroSD cards, USB drives, DVD discs etc. “this is not an analogy or metaphor—it is the plain truth.” ....... What really concerns me more than anything else, is WHY ITS so important for the Atheistic Evolutionist, to interject the term Analogy into the question concerning DNA, and the actual type of information it stores? Because of the problem with complexity. Anyone, who has studied the field of computer programming, realizes how exacting that profession is. In order for a program to work at all—each step must be carefully written, or the program will simply not work. As each step of a program is written, it must be tested, and retested, making sure that all the steps that come first, must be correct, before the next step is added. If not, trying to find a simple mistake, inside millions of lines of code, could be next to impossible. ....... This type of information (computer programming) meets the definition of Specified Complexity—and DNA is built the same way. Not only is the information in DNA an actual “computer program” that builds a biological system, but it is a medium of storage, information retrieval, and error correction system—the likes the universe has never seen (BILL GATES) And the vast amount of data contained inside DNA adds exponential complexity to the conundrum that Atheists must deal with. So, the Atheistic Evolutionist, must destroy DNAs specified complex information requirement, and pedal, what they always pedal—A Just so story to explain away, how something so advanced, so sophisticated, and vastly complex—that Modern Man cannot begin to emulate even WITH A BRAIN—yet the Atheist, evolutionist claims that a Mindless, unguided, undirected process is the Jeanie in the bottle to perform such a feat. A cave painting—is proof of intelligent design—that a four year old could paint, but the creator of Atheism—a Mindless, undirected, unguided process—cannot paint a rudimentary picture on a wall. Yet, it can build vast libraries of information (each biological system has its own DNA) with a computer storage density that Microsoft engineers can only envy, and it has managed to store it in a microscopic Molecule we call DNA. HOGWASH OF THE HIGHEST ORDER

Atheist Professor Dies, and goes to Hell. Meets Jesus

Sir Frederick Hoyle--Any probability 10 to the 50th Power or higher would constitute a MIRACLE. The Probability Problem of Just PASTA in alphabet soup https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C_rcL6KPezk ........An Origami Crane, a Monster Molecular Machine, and the impossibility of JUST ONE PROTEIN FOLD. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SLj3q-VTK1s ....... None of these items could arise by chance alone. Life EVEN at the microscopic level is just too improbable without a designer. WHY IS AN ANALOGY OF COMPUTER INFORMATION SO IMPORTANT TO THE ATHEIST--AND NOT ACTUAL COMPUTER DATA? ....... You wrote: "and still it did not rain literal square formed floppy discs…… Problem you don't see it can only be a metaphor," ....... Response: and you still don't get that this IS NOT AN ANALOGY, METAPHOR, or simply like something else, as you keep trying to push. Let me explain, a floppy disk, a computer tape--two actual physical devices that Richard Dawkins has compared DNA to--an SDCARD, a microSD card, a Hard Drive, these are all actual, physical devices. They are NOT ANALOGIES OF ONE ANOTHER. These are NOT CONCEPTS, these are real, actual, physical devices that exist, JUST LIKE THE DNA MOLECULE is an Actual, real, physical information storage system. So what do these computer devices do? They store, programs, Data, instructions, algorithms, digital characters, JUST LIKE THE DNA OF THE WILLOW TREE DOES. As Richard Dawkins himself said--this is NOT A METAPHOR. THIS IS THE PLAIN TRUTH, and you Anglemou NEED TO READ THE EXACT QUOTE AGAIN, ....... THE exact quote from Richard Dawkins is: QUOTE: It is raining instructions out there; it’s raining programs; it’s raining tree-growing, fluff-spreading, algorithms. That is not a metaphor, it is the plain truth. It couldn’t be any plainer if it were raining floppy discs. Dawkins, Richard. The Blind Watchmaker: Why the Evidence of Evolution Reveals a Universe without Design (p. 158). W. W. Norton & Company. Kindle Edition. ....... IN other words, if you read the quote, Richard Dawkins did NOT SAY IT WAS RAINING FLOPPY DISKS. He said and I quote, "if it were raining floppy discs..." THAT IS A BIG “IF”. What Richard Dawkins did say is that 'it is [actually] raining instructions, out there; it's [actually] raining programs; it's [actually] raining....algorithms. How are they being rained down on the countryside--by being packaged into an actual, physical INFORMATION storage medium, we call DNA (inside the seed of a willow tree) . And this microscopic molecule, contains the actual, SPECIFIED COMPLEX INFORMATION, with actual, programs, instructions, and algorithms for building BIOLOGICAL SYSTEMS. THIS IS THE PLAIN TRUTH IT IS NOT A METAPHOR, AND RICHARD IS NOT SIMPLY TRYING TO TEACH A CONCEPT, that you can then take out of context--and make it some wishy, washy, idea you can mold to fit YOUR AGENDA. ....... No, Richard Dawkins statement “if it were raining floppy discs,” means that Richard Dawkins believes that DNA, serves the same Information and Storage function that floppy discs do, and IT IS NOT A SIMPLE ANALOGY. ....... Quote: DNA is ROM. It can be read millions of times over, but only written to once — when it is first assembled at the birth of the cell in which it resides. The DNA in the cells of any individual is ‘burned in’, and is never altered during that individual’s lifetime, except by very rare random deterioration. It can be copied, however. It is duplicated every time a cell divides. Dawkins, Richard. The Blind Watchmaker: Why the Evidence of Evolution Reveals a Universe without Design (p. 166). W. W. Norton & Company. Kindle Edition ....... DNA IS NOT LIKE ROM—DNA is an actual, physical, and specific form of biological READ ONLY MEMORY (ROM) used to store the specified complex information, programs, instructions, algorithms, and data needed to build YOU AND ME, AND ALL BIOLOGICAL LIFE. Quote: The DNA is arranged along stringy chromosomes, like long computer tapes. All the DNA in each of our cells is addressed in the same sense as computer ROM, or indeed computer tape, is addressed. The exact numbers or names that we use to label a given address are arbitrary, just as they are for computer memory. What matters is that a particular location in my DNA corresponds precisely to one particular location in your DNA: they have the same address. Dawkins, Richard. The Blind Watchmaker: Why the Evidence of Evolution Reveals a Universe without Design (p. 167). W. W. Norton & Company. Kindle Edition. ....... DNA—is addressed for information and storage of that information, and the same thing ACTUALLY occurs in computer tape, floppy discs, hard drives, SDCards, and MicroSD cards, USB drives, DVD discs etc. “this is not an analogy or metaphor—it is the plain truth.” ....... What really concerns me more than anything else, is WHY ITS so important for the Atheistic Evolutionist, to interject the term Analogy into the question concerning DNA, and the actual type of information it stores? Because of the problem with complexity. Anyone, who has studied the field of computer programming, realizes how exacting that profession is. In order for a program to work at all—each step must be carefully written, or the program will simply not work. As each step of a program is written, it must be tested, and retested, making sure that all the steps that come first, must be correct, before the next step is added. If not, trying to find a simple mistake, inside millions of lines of code, could be next to impossible. ....... This type of information (computer programming) meets the definition of Specified Complexity—and DNA is built the same way. Not only is the information in DNA an actual “computer program” that builds a biological system, but it is a medium of storage, information retrieval, and error correction system—the likes the universe has never seen (BILL GATES) And the vast amount of data contained inside DNA adds exponential complexity to the conundrum that Atheists must deal with. ....... So, the Atheistic Evolutionist, must destroy DNAs specified complex information requirement, and pedal, what they always pedal—A Just so story to explain away, how something so advanced, so sophisticated, and vastly complex—that Modern Man cannot begin to emulate even WITH A BRAIN—yet the Atheist, evolutionist claims that a Mindless, unguided, undirected process is the Jeanie in the bottle to perform such a feat. A cave painting—is proof of intelligent design—that a four year old could paint, but the creator of Atheism—a Mindless, undirected, unguided process—cannot paint a rudimentary picture on a wall. Yet, it can build vast libraries of information (each biological system has its own DNA) with a computer storage density that Microsoft engineers can only envy, and it has managed to store it in a microscopic Molecule we call DNA. HOGWASH.

.......When talking with Atheists, they almost always say, well "YOU DON'T HAVE ANY EYEWITNESS TESTIMONY," from someone outside the New Testament Documents--therefore Jesus IS JUST A MYTHICAL man. They call themselves, and are refereed to as mythacists. But if you look closely at the mythacist requirement for eye witness testimony from someone outside the New Testament documents--it can be very easy to debunk this requirement. 1) There are 10 Historical Records, from people outside the Bible, that mention MY JESUS, but it is claimed that they were not eye witnesses to Jesus or his followers--this claim is mostly true, however their may be one exception--more on that in a moment. 2) Having 10 historical records, from 2000 years ago, is actually a plethora of data--not a lack of it. 3) Most people who record HISTORICAL EVENTS--do so AFTER THE FACT, and WERE NOT THERE TO WITNESS THE EVENTS--that is why its called HISTORY, or a Historical Record. 4) However, in this case--it was possible for at least one person to interview eye witnesses of both Jesus, and his apostles. JOSEPHUS: BORN 37AD--died 100AD, Recorded the death of James the brother of Jesus, and Head of the Jerusalem Church, as the authorities had him thrown off of the temple, then stoned, then finally clubbed to death, since he did not die after hitting the ground. SO Josephus--was in a position to interview EYE WITNESSES OF JESUS--including his apostles, AND ALL THESE EVENTS JUST LIKE LUKE DID in the Gosples. 5) So, they could INTERVIEW witnesses WHO KNEW SOMETHING ABOUT THESE EVENTS, OR READ REPORTS ABOUT THE EVENTS, CONTRARY TO YOUR CLAIMS. It happens all the time. The undeniable fact is--YOU HAVE PEOPLE (outside the Bible) MENTIONING, AND CORROBORATING THE New Testament Documents. Now if Jesus is just a myth, as has been claimed in this thread--then THERE SHOULD BE NO MENTION BY ANYONE OF A JESUS AND HIS FOLLOWERS, much less corroborate the NT documents. 6) How do I know this is the case---Lets see--Bart Ehrman--who is the leading New Testament Scholar--and not a believer--SAYS THAT THE JESUS OF THE BIBLE IS A REAL HISTORICAL FIGURE. https://youtu.be/jwN9FcVmOcY. Now what does Bart Erhman base his conclusions on--the actual, credible, historicity of the New Testament Documents, and the Historical Record available to us today. ...... THE FOLLOWING IS A RESPONSE TO MY TALKING ABOUT JOSEPHUS, AND HIS DESCRIPTION OF THE KILLING OF JAMES THE BROTHER OF JESUS. THE ATHEIST CLAIMED "The Jesus quote is a forgery admitted even by all church scholars." In the writings of Josephus--he mentions Jesus and his followers in two separate passages. RESPONSE: A very blatant incorrect statement from you, ...... AND Once again--YOU DID NOT READ MY POST. I did not talk at all about the Jesus Passage. I talked about the JAMES THE BROTHER OF JESUS PASSAGE--more on that in a minute. BUT BACK TO THE JESUS PASSAGE AND WHAT SCHOLARS BELIEVE. I QUOTE: "In the estimation of James Dunn, there is "broad consensus" among scholars regarding what the Testimonium would look like without the interpolations.[5] According to Dunn's reconstruction, the original passage likely read:[5][86] ...... "Now there was about this time Jesus, a wise man. For he was a doer of startling deeds, a teacher of such men as receive the truth with pleasure. And he gained a following both among many Jews and many of Greek origin. And when Pilate, at the suggestion of the principal men amongst us, condemned him to the cross, those that loved him at the first did not forsake him. And the tribe of Christians, so named from him, are not extinct at this day." ...... So--you can have all the best parts removed--all the supposed interpolations. And it still talks about MY JESUS--and fits with the New Testament Documents--PRAISE JESUS. NOW THE JAMES PASSAGE: QUOTE: Modern scholarship has almost universally acknowledged the authenticity of the reference to "the brother of Jesus, who was called Christ, whose name was James"[13] (τὸν ἀδελφὸν Ἰησοῦ τοῦ λεγομένου Χριστοῦ, Ἰάκωβος ὄνομα αὐτῷ) and has rejected its being the result of later Christian interpolation.[14][98][1][15][18] Moreover, in comparison with Hegesippus' account of James' death, most scholars consider Josephus' to be the more historically reliable. ....... Two Quotes from Bart Ehrman--the most famous New Testament Scholar alive today--and NOT a believer in God---Is Jesus of Nazareth a historical figure? 1) QUOTE: Despite this enormous range of opinion, there are several points on which virtually all scholars of antiquity agree. Jesus was a Jewish man, known to be a preacher and teacher, who was crucified (a Roman form of execution) in Jerusalem during the reign of the Roman emperor Tiberius, when Pontius Pilate was the governor of Judea. Even though this is the view of nearly every trained scholar on the planet, it is not the view of a group of writers who are usually labeled, and often label themselves, mythicists. Ehrman, Bart D.. Did Jesus Exist? (p. 12). HarperOne. Kindle Edition. 2) QUOTE: I agree with Schweitzer and virtually all scholars in the field since his day that Jesus existed, that he was ineluctably Jewish, that there is historical information about him in the Gospels, and that we can therefore know some things about what he said and did. Moreover, I agree with Schweitzer’s overarching view, that Jesus is best understood as a Jewish prophet who anticipated a cataclysmic break in history in the very near future, when God would destroy the forces of evil to bring in his own kingdom here on earth. I will explain at the end of this book why so many scholars who have devoted their lives to exploring our ancient sources for the historical Jesus have found this understanding so persuasive. For now I want to stress the most foundational point of all: even though some views of Jesus could loosely be labeled myths (in the sense that mythicists use the term: these views are not history but imaginative creation), Jesus himself was not a myth. He really existed. Praise Jesus Ehrman, Bart D.. Did Jesus Exist? (p. 14). HarperOne. Kindle Edition.

.......MAN ALMOST WENT EXTINCT—WHERE HAVE I HEARD THAT BEFORE? Watch this short video clip form a secular scientist first: https://youtu.be/mTOuAHWshG0 ........ I must thank all of you that keep sending me Atheistic, evolutionary articles, because they contain clues that keep backing up the Biblical Stories. For instance, in a recent article someone sent, is the following Quote: “An alternative is that dumb luck allowed the 46 chromosome humans to win. Perhaps people with 46 chromosomes were in an isolated community somewhere and the rest of humanity was wiped out. Certainly humanity has had near death experiences before. The most recent one was probably 75,000 or so years ago.” ....... Just like the video I included at the beginning of this post, the article says that man almost went extinct—BUT THEY DON’T KNOW HOW—and when they include the word Probably in the quote—THEY DON’T KNOW WHEN. How do they know this—genetic studies. Now, again, the only fact we can go on, is that once the Human Species arrived, sometime later it almost went extinct. NOW WHERE HAVE I HEARD THIS STORY BEFORE? Hmmmmmm let me see. It has something to do with 4 couples, living through a “bottle neck” event. Oh that’s right the Bible got it right again. Seems like there was once a worldwide flood (and this secular video suggests there could have been just that: https://youtu.be/EjiAgoxzcps). And this next secular video gives credence to my claim about the previous video, as it factually states that 600 feet of deposits can be put down by one volcano—now just think what a worldwide flood could do. https://youtu.be/tt2TCbGxmDg. ....... Oh, and the best of all, is that all ancient cultures record such an event, and I quote: “The Sumerian Epic of Gilgamesh dates back nearly 5,000 years and is thought to be perhaps the oldest written tale on the planet…..Myriad ancient cultures have their own legends of watery cataclysm and salvation. According to Vedic lore......An Aztec story sees a devout couple hide in the hollow of a vast tree with two ears of corn as divine storms drown the wicked of the land. Creation myths from Egypt to Scandinavia involve tidal floods of all sorts of substances — including the blood of deities — purging and remaking the earth…. Flood myths are so universal that the Hungarian psychoanalyst Geza Roheim thought their origins were physiological, not historical. TIME MAGAZINE Before Noah: Myths of the Flood Are Far Older Than the Bible” In fact, Hollywood has recently released a movie about the Flood, but the producers admit they used the Babylonian version. https://youtu.be/GxsZTA0sTws ....... So lets see, we have genetic evidence that all humans almost went extinct. We have evidence from the Grand Canyon—that it was covered at one time by the sea, up to over a mile high. We have evidence form Mount St. Helens that one volcano can put down 600 feet of deposits in a very short period of time. And we have written records from all ancient cultures (NOT JUST ONE RELIGIOUS SECT) about a world wide flood. And of course we have the Biblical Narrative. The Bible got it right again. It has never been a better time to be a person of Faith than it is today. Praise Jesus.

AARTICLE: The research, headed by Mary Schweitzer, ...... The find was also controversial, because scientists had thought proteins that make up soft tissue should degrade in less than 1 million years in the best of conditions. In most cases, microbes feast on a dead animal's soft tissue, destroying it within weeks. The tissue must be something else, perhaps the product of a later bacterial invasion, critics argued. ...... Then, in 2007, Schweitzer and her colleagues analyzed the chemistry of the T. rex proteins. They found the proteins really did come from dinosaur soft tissue. The tissue was collagen, they reported in the journal Science, and it shared similarities with bird collagen — which makes sense, as modern birds evolved from theropod dinosaurs such as T. rex. ....... The researchers also analyzed other fossils for the presence of soft tissue, and found it was present in about half of their samples going back to the Jurassic Period, which lasted from 145.5 million to 199.6 million years ago, Schweitzer said. "The problem is, for 300 years, we thought, 'Well, the organics are all gone, so why should we look for something that's not going to be there?' and nobody looks," she said. Controversial T. Rex Soft Tissue Find Finally Explained By Stephanie Pappas, Senior Writer | November 26, 2013 07:01pm ET ....... RESPONSE: So right on que--they discount all the evidence right in front of their faces--JUST TO KEEP EVOLUTION ALIVE--even though, both Lab Work, and 300 years of "BELIEF" and teaching about biologicals, went right out the window. Instead of questioning the age of the bones and biologicals--they kept the evolutionary time scales--and again threw all the evidence "under the bus." ...... AND Mary Schweitzer's subsequent meager 2 year, lab controlled study--supposedly confirming the ability for biologicals to last Multi-millions of years--appears on its face to be JUST ANOTHER JUST SO STORY TO PROP UP Darwinian Evolution. Iron in the blood is a FREE RADICAL that destroys tissues, IT DOES NOT PRESERVE IT. And for Mary Schweitzer, and her team to find biologicals in at least 50 percent of the samples they have gathered over the years--is phenomenal, and Prima Facie Evidence for a young Creation. Biological Material is now not a "rare find." Now I have to break one of my rules not to use evidence from a Creationist Scientist because no one else dare talk about it. The man in the video is Mark Armitage Lets Watch the Video https://youtu.be/iN04I8HuFGw Why was Mark Armitage fired? Do “evolutionists” seem to care about following the evidence where it leads? Do “scientists” in general have a bias? What is wrong with Mary Schweitzer’s theory of “Free Radical Iron” acting like a tissue preservative? ELEPHANT IN THE ROOM VIDEOS https://studio.youtube.com/video/uZ0Fg2Jju0Y/edit https://studio.youtube.com/video/Ld_3cCjM0SU/edit Why won’t scientists allow a Carbon 14 test to be done? Why—is the previous “science belief” of 1 Million Years max for biological materials thrown out—instead of realizing that perhaps the Dinosaurs in question are NOT older than 1 Million Years? What happens to Scientists that don’t toe the Evolutionary Fairy Tale? A GOOD HELPING OF EVOLUTIONARY BIAS ANYONE. THIS IS WHY I WILL NEVER BELIEVE IN EVOLUTION—EVERYTHING—EVEN SCIENCE IS PC.

MATERIALISTS, ATHEISTS ACTUALLY BELIEVE YOU CAN GET SOMETHING FROM NOTHING https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oFSMozCz2gw https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CsRLN5H857s ....... By definition, Atheists don't believe there is a God, and materialists only believe in the Material world. Well, why is there something rather than nothing? Where did it all come from? Science is the search for causes. Since I was caused, the Earth was caused, all life was caused, the entire Universe was caused--according to science today--there must be a cause for it. Science--our repeated experience tells us that everything in this universe had a cause, and by logic alone, since space, time, matter, and energy came into being at the Big Bang, that cause must be outside space, time, matter, energy to cause it to come into being. ...... Now by the Laws of logic alone, at some time in the past, we must come to an eternal cause, an uncaused cause--why--because there would be nothing instead of something. This has nothing to do with religion, it is all logic. But by definition--atheists and materialists by definition, do not believe in such a being. So yes, if you are a hard atheist, and/or a materialist, you believe there is no uncaused cause, Prime Mover, or First Cause--therefore, the universe came into being from nothing and by nothing. (Arno Penzias) Otherwise, you are an agnostic--you just don't know--and it’s ok to be an agnostic, and admit it. At least it’s much more honest.

EXPERT MARK ARMITAGE GETS FIRED FOR RESEARCH ON A TRICERITOPS HORN AND THE BIOLOGICALS HE FOUND ......ARTICLE (THE JUST SO EVOUTIONARY BS STORY) Controversial T. Rex Soft Tissue Find Finally Explained By Stephanie Pappas, Senior Writer | November 26, 2013 07:01pm ET ...... The controversial discovery of 68-million-year-old soft tissue from the bones of a Tyrannosaurus rex finally has a physical explanation. According to new research, iron in the dinosaur's body preserved the tissue before it could decay. ...... The research, headed by Mary Schweitzer, a molecular paleontologist at North Carolina State University, explains how proteins — and possibly even DNA — can survive millennia. Schweitzer and her colleagues first raised this question in 2005, when they found the seemingly impossible: soft tissue preserved inside the leg of an adolescent Trex unearthed in Montana. "What we found was unusual, because it was still soft and still transparent and still flexible," Schweitzer told LiveScience. ......"The problem is, for 300 years, we thought, 'Well, the organics are all gone, so why should we look for something that's not going to be there?' and nobody looks," she said. ...... The obvious question, though, was how soft, pliable tissue could survive for millions of years. In a new study published today (Nov. 26) in the journal Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, Schweitzer thinks she has the answer: Iron. Iron lady ...... Iron is an element present in abundance in the body, particularly in the blood, where it is part of the protein that carries oxygen from the lungs to the tissues. Iron is also highly reactive with other molecules, so the body keeps it locked up tight, bound to molecules that prevent it from wreaking havoc on the tissues. ..... After death, though, iron is let free from its cage. It forms minuscule iron nanoparticles and also generates free radicals, which are highly reactive molecules thought to be involved in aging. "The free radicals cause proteins and cell membranes to tie in knots," Schweitzer said. "They basically act like formaldehyde." ....MY RESPONSES TO THE CLAIMS GIVEN IN THE ARTICLE OCCUMS RAZOR: The simplest explanation tends to be the correct one. ...... So according to the article—for 300 years—science taught that fossils, which have to be millions of years old, could not and would not have any biological materials left. According to Neil deGrasse Tyson, all fossils are “rocks,” even the bone materials are gone. However, now today Evolutionists know differently but they keep sticking to their millions of years MANTRA story. ...... The History of dinosaur artifacts like cave paintings and pottery, proves beyond a reasonable doubt, that men living even a few thousand years ago must have “put their eyes” on these creatures. Furthermore, FREE RADICALS, antioxidents and mary Schweitzer’S THEORY WHERE IS THE LOGIC? ......Free Radicals Medical Definition: an especially reactive atom or group of atoms that has one or more unpaired electrons; especially : one that is produced in the body by natural biological processes or introduced from outside (as in tobacco smoke, toxins, or pollutants) and that can damage cells, proteins, and DNA by altering their chemical structure. ......Anti-Oxidents Definition: a substance that inhibits oxidation, especially one used to counteract the deterioration of stored food products. a substance such as vitamin C or E that removes potentially damaging oxidizing agents in a living organism. So the Article claims that iron in the blood can preserve the tissues like a type of formaldehyde ...... Now I have to break one of my rules not to use evidence from a Creationist Scientist because no one else dare talk about it. The man in the video is Mark Armitage Lets Watch the Video https://youtu.be/iN04I8HuFGw Why was Mark Armitage fired? Do “evolutionists” seem to care about following the evidence where it leads? Do “scientists” in general have a bias? What is wrong with Mary Schweitzer’s theory of “Free Radical Iron” acting like a tissue preservative? ELEPHANT IN THE ROOM VIDEOS https://studio.youtube.com/video/uZ0Fg2Jju0Y/edit https://studio.youtube.com/video/Ld_3cCjM0SU/edit Why won’t scientists allow a Carbon 14 test to be done? Why—is the previous “science belief” of 1 Million Years max for biological materials thrown out—instead of realizing that perhaps the Dinosaurs in question are NOT older than 1 Million Years? What happens to Scientists that don’t toe the Evolutionary Fairy Tale? A GOOD HELPING OF EVOLUTIONARY BIAS ANYONE. THIS IS WHY I WILL NEVER BELIEVE IN EVOLUTION—EVERYTHING—EVEN SCIENCE IS PC.

THE MODERN DAY CREATION STORY ...... In the year 2020, modern science maintains that 13.6 Billion years ago, all space, time, matter and energy exploded on the scene, and between, 10 to the minus 36 seconds, and 10 to the minus 33 seconds, a period of rapid, exponential expansion occurred, which Allen Guth called Inflation. In fact, the expansion was so extensive, that a point smaller than an atom, grew to a size "much larger" than the observable universe, in a trillionth, of a trillionth, of a trillionth of a second, second after the Big Bang. See short video clip here. https://rumble.com/vb1d2d-beginning-of-the-universe-and-the-bible.html. Because of some of the problems, with the Big Bang theory (like the flatness problem, and the horizon problem to name a few) Allen Guth Proposed the Inflation Theory as a solution, and it is the Inflationary--Big Bang model today that most cosmologists hold to. So, very early in the universe, something beyond the physics we know today happened—and again, according to the video clip, all of space, time, energy and matter, expanded from an infinitesimal small singularity, to a size "much larger" than the known universe. Sounds a lot like Genesis Chapter 1 and verse 3, AND GOD SAID… and Genesis chapter 1 and verse 1 IN THE BEGINNING GOD. Our universe appeared--because any observer besides the creator, would not be able to distinguish between the sudden appearance of something, compared to a universe that began the size smaller than an atom, and grew to a size "much larger" than then known universe, in a trillionth, of a trillionth, of a trillionth of a second. Yet cosmologists, and astrophysicists of today by and large accept this idea. ...... Now, even more mystery is added to the puzzle, because; First the universe expands exponentially to the size of the known universe, in a very small amount of time; Second, in comparison to the Inflation Phase, the universe comes to an almost complete stop—and we do not know what stopped this exponential expansion, nor how long it took; and third, today, not only is the universe expanding, it is expanding at an accelerated rate—after slowing down first. So, why and how, the exponential Inflation phase? Then the astronomical slow down in speed—even if it took 300 Million years to do it? And lastly, the universe kept expanding, and is now expanding at an accelerated rate? So what part of the BIG BANG, seems to follow the physics we know? In other words, what part of the Big Bang seems to be a purely “natural” materialistic BIG BANG phenomena? Yet this is the accepted model in 2020. Allen Guth himself talks about the Big Bang, in this short video clip just ahead—and he is referencing the Microwave Background Radiation, which is the heat left over from, the Big Bang. What is so fascinating about the Microwave Background Radiation is its astronomical, and unbelievable temperature difference across the universe. ...... The BANG, of The Big Bang, was so uniform, that it only varied by 1/50,000 of only one degree, across the entire universe. In the clip Allen Guth explains, no known “NATURAL” explosion (Allen Guth is a Materialist) that we know of is so uniform—either in its temperature range, or distribution of matter—and he gives several examples of other explosions in the clip. See the video clip here: https://rumble.com/vccgur-the-universe-was-created-by-god-here-is-proof.html. Does this sound like a Natural Explosion, or a “controlled” demolition so to speak? So why accept the Microwave Background Radiation at all? See video clip by Brian Cox: https://rumble.com/vhnnur-the-fatih-statement-of-all-atheists.html... What is even more surprising to me, is that the cosmology of toady, actually contemplates ideas that actually invalidates one of the most valued beliefs in the past, and adds an exception to make this “violation” possible. To start off with, watch this short video clip: https://rumble.com/vb1d7x-einstein-no-thing-can-travel-faster-than-the-speed-of-light.html. ....... So according to Albert Einstein, no “thing,” nothing made of matter, not even the smallest particles can travel faster than the speed of light. As any matter travels closer and closer, to the speed of light, its mass become infinite. Furthermore, Just a few decades ago, all anyone really knew about the Universe, is that it was expanding. What they did not know was: 1) The universe is expanding, but slowing down leading to a big crunch, because all of the matter in the universe was pulling in on each other by gravity, and slowly halting the expansion of the universe. 2) The universe is expanding, but at a steady pace—no force needed 3) The universe is expanding, but at an accelerated rate, leading to the Heat Death of the Universe, and a forever expanding universe. ...... Well as it turns out, number 3 appears to be the winner, yet this has raised eyebrows in the scientific community. The discovery of an accelerating universe in the late 1990s by a group of scientists, has rocked the world of cosmology. Why? The Physics we know. Even in the vacuum of space, all accelerating bodies require a force be applied for the acceleration to continue. E.g. If you want your space craft to accelerate from 3000 miles per hour, to 4000 miles per hour it needs more and more energy. Once you arrive at your intended speed, simply remove the energy, and you will coast at 4000 miles an hour (an example of #2 above, a universe expanding at a steady pace—no force needed). Well, if the Big Bang occurred 13.6 Billion Years ago—what is causing this acceleration of the universe today? (By the way—there may be another possible answer to the accelerating universe that I will mention but this is NOT my argument in this article, and that is that the universe could be much, much younger than believed, and still in the acceleration phase of an exploding singularity. AGAIN, THIS IS NOT MY ARGUMENT IN THIS ARTICLE, but a very real possibility). ...... At any rate, today in 2020, scientists call the enigmatic force that is stretching out the universe, Dark Energy, and this sentence contains a clue which I will explain shortly. Today in 2020, it’s a purely materialistic concept, and they have NO IDEA what Dark Energy is, even though they propose that it makes up 75 percent of our universe. https://rumble.com/vb1bk7-dark-energy-is-in-the-bible-even-though-man-does-not-know-what-it-is.html. So, an unknown mysterious force is acting on our universe, to accelerate it; in fact, this acceleration is causing galaxies that are at the edge of our field of view of the known universe, to accelerate away from us faster than the speed of light—seeming to violate Einstein’s rule that no matter in the universe can break the speed of light barrier. So what is a good cosmologist—a surprised, and befuddled cosmologist—to do? I know, lets carve out an exception to Einstein’s rule that matter in the universe cannot travel faster than the speed of light. More precisely, even though the galaxies at the edge of our field of view seem to be traveling away from us at the speed of light, they are NOT. Instead, there is a very awesome, strange, and mysterious force in the universe (the materialist scientists have dubbed Dark Energy) and this mysterious force is stretching the space between the galaxies. See this short video: https://rumble.com/vdi55l-the-universe-is-being-stretched-who-is-the-stretcher.html ...... In other words, the galaxies, are technically NOT moving at all. It is the FABRIC of space itself that today is being stretched, and it is being stretched so fast, that the galaxies further from our field of view are flying away from us faster than the speed of light. In 2020 they estimate that 75 percent of our Universe is made up of this Dark Energy. Now please understand this, this means that this enormous stretching is creating MORE SPACE where there was no space before. More space, which is NOT NOTHING, but is being stretched into NOTHING, where NOTHING here means the classical term for nothing. ( Psalms Chapter 4 verse 2 NIV “The LORD wraps himself in light as with a garment; he stretches out the heavens like a tent) Isaiah Chapter 40 verse 22 KJV..... It is He that sitteth upon the circle of the earth, and the inhabitants thereof are as grasshoppers, who stretcheth out the heavens as a curtain and spreadeth them out as a tent to dwell in, Job Chapter 9 verse 8 NIV He alone stretches out the heavens and treads on the waves of the sea.) Question: how could sheep herders, in the Land of Israel some 3600 years ago know something about the universe—that modern science did not know until the late 1990s? ....... Another conundrum created by this situation is our own galaxy. If the fabric of space is being stretched, how come the space within our galaxy between the planets is not affected? Why does the stuff inside the galaxy stay together at a constant distance, but the space between the galaxies is stretching out continually? In fact, another mystery that cosmologists have recently found, concerns the observable matter (planets, stars etc.) and the spin of our galaxy around the black hole in the middle. By mathematical calculations, and observation, the planets on the outer edge of our galaxy, should by all rights, be flung out into space, much like a kid on the outer edge of a merry-go-round. Scientists have calculated that there is NOT enough “regular matter” to create enough “gravity” to hold the plants and stars in their places. See this short video: https://rumble.com/vdignf-our-galaxy-is-spinning-tooooooo-fast-god-holds-it-together.html ......So, how to solve this conundrum—and of course keep our materialistic only world view--we need to propose another unknown galaxy wide binding force (by the way, the antithesis of Dark Energy, which is stretching the universe apart) and this time we will call it Dark Matter. Why Dark Matter, because everyone knows, that from a purely materialistic point of view, the only thing that could possibly exist to bind the galaxies together is some type of unknown matter, to create enough gravity, to bind the galaxy together, but today in 2020 we can’t see it, can’t feel it, can’t detect it, and can’t measure it. All we see are the effects of an unknown force holding our galaxy together. See these two short video clips: https://rumble.com/vb1ahb-martin-rees-dark-matter-we-do-not-know-what-it-is..html https://rumble.com/vdyx4t-dark-matter-fable-for-grownups-just-to-avoid-belief-in-god.html ....... Today, in 2020, cosmologists estimate that Dark Energy makes up about 70 percent of our universe, Dark Matter makes up about 25 percent, and only 5 percent of our universe is made up of the stuff we can see with our eyes, or even measure. Think of that, today in 2020, it seems as if we are going a bit backward? We only know what makes up 5 percent of our universe. Another question about Dark Matter Particles—why is there NO apparent Dark Matter between the Galaxies holding the Galaxies together? I mean if it truly is just a particle that we have not yet discovered, what is keeping it confined inside the galaxies, if the galaxies are surrounded by nothing but empty space? Like a gas, filling every part of a closed container, if Dark Matter is simply a particle we cannot detect, then Dark Matter should even out, and fill the closed system our Universe appears to be, and bind everything together—NOT JUST GALAXY SIZE OBJECTS. Also, it’s the nature of the opposing two unknown forces we call Dark Energy, and Dark Matter, that has me really intrigued. Watch this short video: https://rumble.com/vdyx9j-dark-matter-our-friend-dark-energy-our-enemy.html ....... So the force we call Dark Matter—is our friend, because it makes galaxy formation possible, and is a galaxy wide cohesive force, keeping the planets and stars in their places. Colossians Chapter 1 verses 16 and 17 AMP 16 For [d]by Him all things were created in heaven and on earth, [things] visible and invisible, whether thrones or dominions or rulers or authorities; all things were created and exist through Him [that is, by His activity] and for Him. 17 And He Himself existed and is before all things, and in Him all things hold together. [His is the controlling, cohesive force of the universe.] [Jesus] is the controlling, cohesive force of the universe. ...... But on the other hand, thanks to an unknown force they call Dark Energy, the entire universe is being stretched at an accelerated rate, ultimately ending in the Big Rip, if the process of energy consumption, and the running down of the universe is not halted. ...... These are mysteries probably left for future generations to solve, but I must admit as a Theist, how the Apostle Paul in the Land of Israel 2000 years ago could say that “in Him [Jesus] all things hold together,” is a mind boggling testimony of God’s word. Praise Jesus

TWO SECULAR SCIENTIFIC facts about the MODERN HUMAN RACE. 1) FACT 1 https://rumble.com/vc73px-modern-science-supports-adam-and-eve.-two-people-we-are-all-related-too..html ......So the entire human population, according to secular Scientists who study genetics, shows that the entire human race is related to the same two parents. Well, let me see, where did I hear that story before? Of course, since the scientist in the film is an evolutionist, he gives it a good old evolutionary spin, BUT THAT WOULD BE HIS SPECULATION ONLY. The only real FACT we have from the science is--we all descended from a COMMON HUMAN ancestral pair--yeah, and we call them ADAM and EVE. SO THE BIBLE GOT IT RIGHT FORM THE VERY BEGINNING. Ancient history, across many cultures of the time also talk about the first parents AND I QUOTE: "The Hebrew and Greek accounts are not alone in the literature of the ancient Near East. Mesopotamian civilization and culture are considered to have begun at Sumer, and the Sumerians had a paradise myth, composed in the 3rd or 2nd millennium B.C., it consists of an unmistakable parallel with the Biblical account.2 Likewise, in ancient Egypt, the theme of an original paradise was pervasive." Now add this fact of one man and one woman to the FACT stated below, and the Bible wins hands down period. 2) FACT 2 SCIENCE SUNDAY: THE BOTTLENECK JUST SO EVOLUTIONARY STORY THAT HAD TO BE POSTULATED This past week, one of my recent posts really got the Atheists going. It is based on this short secular video clip that I showed. https://rumble.com/vccg1j-evolution-of-man-is-a-fairy-tale-of-the-highest-order.html. In the video, the narrator claims that at some time in the past, the human race almost went extinct. My point then, was that the Flood of Noah was THE explanation for this “bottleneck event.” However, after a week of debate, I came across the true reason why the Evolutionists propose that a “bottleneck event” is so very, very, very (can’t say very enough) important to their way of thinking. Let’s start with a couple of other secular video clips, and then, a quote to bring more information into this discussion. Now, for my Atheist friends—as I always try to do, I have found all my scientific information from people considered hostile to religious thought—in other words, evolutionists themselves. ...... One of the Atheist commenters to my post—disputed what I claimed (4 human breeding pairs after the Noah flood bottleneck event) by saying that there were “10,000 breeding pairs after the “bottleneck event,” and at the time I did not refute what he said, even though I knew the scientific research showed the number is much lower. In fact, in this first video, it talks about the “bottleneck event”, and they actually discuss the idea of how many “breeding pairs” of humans were available after the “bottleneck event.” https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q31xhg_YVc8 So, researchers believe, that it could have been as low as 40 breeding pairs—which, by the way, is astronomically closer to 4 breeding pairs, than it is to 10,000 breeding pairs. ...... Next up, is another secular video, that not only states that “only a handful of survivors” made it past the bottleneck, but it also brings into focus an astounding piece of information. Here is the video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EMJ9zlNqVgk. Of course, the video GIVES the standard evolutionary claims, that humans have actually been around 6 million years, based on the fossil record. But in addition to these standard claims I have heard since I was a kid--they add THE THEORY of human population bottlenecks. Now please stop and ask yourself, why even postulate human bottlenecks? If the standard evolutionary JUST SO story is true—why postulate human population bottlenecks at all—and it hit me like a ton of bricks. BECAUSE THE EVOLUTIONIST HAS TO EXPLAIN AWAY THE EVIDENCE RIGHT IN FRONT OF HIS FACE—AND THAT EVIDENCE GOES AGAINST DARWINIAN EVOLUTION. In other words—please get this—an evolutionist by definition—already believes in evolution—so instead of following the evidence where it leads, he must explain away any contra evidence to his DOGMA and religion—he must propose another JUST SO story to keep his paradigm alive. ...... Let me explain. Here is a Secular Science quote: All human beings are 99.9 percent identical in their genetic makeup. Differences in the remaining 0.1 percent hold important clues about the causes of diseases. Article: Genetics vs. Genomics Fact Sheet. Genome.gov September 7, 2018. So in the year 2020, the science establishment knows that all humans alive today share 99.9 percent of the same DNA. In other words, there is no evidence, that modern humans have existed for 6 million years as the video suggests. In fact, with only a .1 percent genetic difference between all humans, the human species alive today, cannot date back more than a few thousand years. ...... How can this claim be made—virtually NO genetic diversity—in the modern day gene pool of Human Beings. In other words, the only real hard evidence we have, is that modern genetic studies, and geneticists have to EXPLAIN away the data that is right in front of there collective faces—especially if they are evolutionists. Which means, the only real hard data we have, is that all humans alive today, lack any genetic diversity PERIOD. Of course, the evolutionist’s FIX for this predicament is to propose a human population bottleneck—there we patched up our JUST SO evolutionary story once again. And here is the most important HOWEVER of my post, what does THE EVIDENCE ACTUALY imply—it implies one very important fact—and it is the only true fact we can go on—the Human Species is NOT 6 million years old, or 200,000, or 100,000 or even 75,000 years old period. Well, if the human species is not even 75,000 thousand years old based upon the lack of genetic diversity—how old are they? ...... Lets now bring in some more genetic evidence, in a recent secular study: QUOTE: “Around 7,000 years ago - all the way back in the Neolithic - something really peculiar happened to human genetic diversity. Over the next 2,000 years, and seen across Africa, Europe and Asia, the genetic diversity of the Y chromosome collapsed, becoming as though there was only one man for every 17 women. Now, through computer modelling, researchers believe they have found the cause of this mysterious phenomenon: fighting between patrilineal clans. Article: Something Weird Happened to Men 7,000 Years Ago, And We Finally Know Why, MICHELLE STARR, 31 MAY 2018” ...... So between 7000, and 5000 years ago, “something really peculiar happened to human genetic diversity.” Oh really—yep, with a 2000 year window, we can attribute the appearance of modern man to one of two events. 1) A special creation of God, Or 2) the Flood of Noah a few thousand years later—take your pick—either one fits the data. I know, I know, for the Atheist, I can see the veins in your neck popping out right about now. And of course—the article SPECULATED by “computer model” what caused this “peculiar” event—but again that would be there evolutionary bias and Just So story to explain the event. Furthermore, with only .1 percent difference between all humans—male and female—not just the men--even the proposed 75,000 year ago bottleneck event, is way too much time. In other words, if the bottle neck event happened 75,000 years ago, there would be more than just .1 percent difference in the human genetic population, by this time. Fact is, the latest scientific evidence shows, that 7,000 years is a more reasonable time estimate for only a .1 percent genetic difference among humans. And since these “bottleneck” events don’t happen often, one must pick the secular evolutionary just so bottleneck story, that fits the data the best—and a 7,000 to 5,000 year old bottleneck story, fits the data, and wins hands down. Period. So, .......THE BIBLE got it right again, and I have ancient records—from the oldest written language on my side—talking about both Adam and Eve, and Noah’s flood no less. And now, I even have scientific evidence of a “bottleneck event”—which corresponds nicely to the Biblical Records. It has never been a better time to be a person of FAITH than it is today. Have a Blessed day—I know I will.

This video, kills two scientific assumptions 1) No geologic Column 2) Our Present Methods of Dating the age of rocks DOES NOT WORK ......A person commented and asked about "the order of the fossils in the geological column" Three videos to question the Geologic Column" 1) One volcano in the United States laid down over 600 feet of deposits, in only a few years time. https://rumble.com/vccfn5-catastrophe-millions-of-years-need-not-apply.-mount-st.-helens.html But if the evolutionist had not seen the event--you can bet that BILLIONS OF YEARS WOULD BE THE EXCUSE PERIOD, and of course the layers would line up perfectly with the Geologic column--because of course they are the authorities, and you must believe what gets published. However, please note what the author of the video said, A MUD FLOW from the volcano cut out the canyon--NOT the tiny water stream in the middle. What??? 2) A trilobite, is an index fossil. An index fossil, is a fossil that is used to date a particular portion of the strata, in the Geologic Column. Well, supposedly if you come across a trilobite, you have reached the LAST layer with any biological material, called the Cambrian Layer. hmmmmmmm, what is a modern shoe print doing stepping on an extinct trilobite? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jjDYa... How come discoveries like this never make it into the textbooks, and why were the scientists in the video afraid to have anything to do with this find? Its called THE EVOLUTIONARY ESTABLISHMENT'S WITCH TRIALS AND INQUISITION. 3) In this video, a secular scientist is explaining the layers he observes in the Grand Canyon. https://rumble.com/vd131p-grand-canyon-prima-facie-evidence-the-creation-story-in-the-bible-is-true.html Now the canyon is 300 or so miles from any ocean, yet, at the bottom of the canyon, and a mile high--he finds ocean fossils--NOT THE POINT OF MY ARGUMENT BUT I COULD NOT RESIST (FLOOD ANYONE). His explanation for the 8 different layers in the canyon, is the SEA must of covered that area, 8 different times, over BILLIONS of years. But now we are talking about a "local" sea flood, 8 different times. Where is this ubiquitous geologic column at? This would be an example of a "local" geologic column. Also, If one modern volcano can put down 600 feet of deposits in only a few years--why does it take Billions of years for the Grand Canyon--which scientists say was formed by 100 volcanoes? ......NOTHING IS EVER AS EASY AND AIR TIGHT AS THE EVOLUTIONIST WOULD HAVE YOU BELIEVE--And whenever the science goes against them, they bury it as fast as possible, OR SCREAM HOAX, and attack the finder.

A CAVE PAINTING VS. OVER A HALF TRILLION MICROSCOPIC MACHINES AT THE TIP OF YOUR FINGER A Secular TEDx Video clip https://rumble.com/vc8a2f-half-a-trillion-microscopic-machines-vs.-a-cave-painting.html ......In the video clip, the secular scientist discusses Protein molecular machines. He gives just three protein machine examples, and a video demonstration how each machine works. Along with the unbelievable microscopic size of these machines, and the “10s of thousands to 100s of thousands of different types of machines” in our bodies, the video discusses “scaling” up the “technology” found in living cells, so we can use them today. He exclaims, the tip of your finger has more microscopic machines than the ½ trillion machines in the world today. He talks about learning to understand the “principles” of how these machines, and the technology works. Why, because of the awesome, design, and efficiency of these machines rival any technology we have today, and they can teach us how to design better modern machines. Example: the flagellar motor in the film, can spin upwards of 100,000 rpm, and change direction in ¼ of a turn. ...... Yet, when modern evolutionary man looks at this complexity, and unfathomable, intricate design, he can say—no big deal. A mindless, unguided, undirected process put all that together—and in only 10 to the 18 seconds. On the other hand, he looks at a simple cave painting, and exclaims, man (a brain, an intelligence) was here. BUT the microscopic world of vast information, and intricate molecular machines and structures—indicates only “apparent design.” Evolution’s God of a Mindless process, lacks the intelligence to paint a rudimentary picture that even a 5 year old could match, but it can design microscopic systems—we can only envy today, and hope to one day “scale-up” in the future. So, no matter how exquisitely designed life is, the ridiculous idea of a mindless process holds a blinder over the eyes, and the evolutionary man HOPES, believes, AND PRAYS to his mindless God—please show us how you did ALL THAT through a Mindless Process. ......Darwin said: “If it could be demonstrated that any complex organ existed, which could not possibly have been formed by numerous, successive, slight modifications, my theory would absolutely break down. But I can find no such case.” Charles Darwin, The Origin of Species ...... Now, Charlie Darwin, was blind to what was in the cell. He could not see molecules like Messenger RNA, and how they are built in the cell, but we can. And the Manufacture—and use of the RNA molecule—is dependent on so many systems—and at least two Micro Machines (the RNA Polymerase, and protein building factories called Ribosomes). The RNA Polymerase, is an enzyme—or molecular machine—which manufactures the Messenger RNA Molecule, from information in the DNA molecule. Then, by the help of Protein Factories called Ribosomes, the “message” in the Messenger RNA is physically translated into Amino Acids, to build long chain proteins. All these systems (and the information in the DNA molecule) are interdependent on each other—and wishing it be different—is a waste of mind, life, and intellectual energy to deny it. ......Here is life, at the smallest scales, and it demonstrates: “a complex [system] exists, which cannot possibly have been formed by numerous, successive, slight modifications, [so] my theory [has] absolutely [broken] down.” Charles Darwin Origin of the species.

......Catastrophe is a better explanation for Petrified trees with no root systems, than Millions of years. ...... SO with Mt Saint Helens, you have a modern day example of a deposition of over 600 feet of deposits, in a very short period of time. https://youtu.be/qZBBmObLFG8 In this video, it is clear that the "canyon" the small grand canyon was carved out by a mud flow from the volcano, and it took no time at all. Also, did you notice that essentially brand new rock was dated to be 800 thousand to millions of years old? Why is that. Maybe the techniques don't work. Then in this next video, we have more evidence that millions of years NEED NOT APPLY. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D8oMyckY7sg So a catastrophe is a better explanation than the standard evolutionary millions of years BS story for petrified trees without root systems. EVOLUTION IS NOT AS AIR TIGHT AS YOU HAVE BEEN TAUGHT TO BELIEVE. It has never been a better time to be a person of faith than today. Praise Jesus

EVOLUTIONARY BIAS AND DOGMA ON DISPLAY ......ARTICLE (THE JUST SO EVOUTIONARY BS STORY) Controversial T. Rex Soft Tissue Find Finally Explained By Stephanie Pappas, Senior Writer | November 26, 2013 07:01pm ET ...... The controversial discovery of 68-million-year-old soft tissue from the bones of a Tyrannosaurus rex finally has a physical explanation. According to new research, iron in the dinosaur's body preserved the tissue before it could decay. ...... The research, headed by Mary Schweitzer, a molecular paleontologist at North Carolina State University, explains how proteins — and possibly even DNA — can survive millennia. Schweitzer and her colleagues first raised this question in 2005, when they found the seemingly impossible: soft tissue preserved inside the leg of an adolescent Trex unearthed in Montana. "What we found was unusual, because it was still soft and still transparent and still flexible," Schweitzer told LiveScience. ......"The problem is, for 300 years, we thought, 'Well, the organics are all gone, so why should we look for something that's not going to be there?' and nobody looks," she said. ...... The obvious question, though, was how soft, pliable tissue could survive for millions of years. In a new study published today (Nov. 26) in the journal Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, Schweitzer thinks she has the answer: Iron. Iron lady ...... Iron is an element present in abundance in the body, particularly in the blood, where it is part of the protein that carries oxygen from the lungs to the tissues. Iron is also highly reactive with other molecules, so the body keeps it locked up tight, bound to molecules that prevent it from wreaking havoc on the tissues. ..... After death, though, iron is let free from its cage. It forms minuscule iron nanoparticles and also generates free radicals, which are highly reactive molecules thought to be involved in aging. "The free radicals cause proteins and cell membranes to tie in knots," Schweitzer said. "They basically act like formaldehyde." ....MY RESPONSES TO THE CLAIMS GIVEN IN THE ARTICLE OCCUMS RAZOR: The simplest explanation tends to be the correct one. ...... So according to the article—for 300 years—science taught that fossils, which have to be millions of years old, could not and would not have any biological materials left. According to Neil deGrasse Tyson, all fossils are “rocks,” even the bone materials are gone. However, now today Evolutionists know differently but they keep sticking to their millions of years MANTRA story. ...... The History of dinosaur artifacts like cave paintings and pottery, proves beyond a reasonable doubt, that men living even a few thousand years ago must have “put their eyes” on these creatures. Furthermore, FREE RADICALS, antioxidents and mary Schweitzer’S THEORY WHERE IS THE LOGIC? ......Free Radicals Medical Definition: an especially reactive atom or group of atoms that has one or more unpaired electrons; especially : one that is produced in the body by natural biological processes or introduced from outside (as in tobacco smoke, toxins, or pollutants) and that can damage cells, proteins, and DNA by altering their chemical structure. ......Anti-Oxidents Definition: a substance that inhibits oxidation, especially one used to counteract the deterioration of stored food products. a substance such as vitamin C or E that removes potentially damaging oxidizing agents in a living organism. So the Article claims that iron in the blood can preserve the tissues like a type of formaldehyde ...... Now I have to break one of my rules not to use evidence from a Creationist Scientist because no one else dare talk about it. The man in the video is Mark Armitage Lets Watch the Video https://youtu.be/iN04I8HuFGw Why was Mark Armitage fired? Do “evolutionists” seem to care about following the evidence where it leads? Do “scientists” in general have a bias? What is wrong with Mary Schweitzer’s theory of “Free Radical Iron” acting like a tissue preservative? ELEPHANT IN THE ROOM VIDEOS https://studio.youtube.com/video/uZ0Fg2Jju0Y/edit https://studio.youtube.com/video/Ld_3cCjM0SU/edit Why won’t scientists allow a Carbon 14 test to be done? Why—is the previous “science belief” of 1 Million Years max for biological materials thrown out—instead of realizing that perhaps the Dinosaurs in question are NOT older than 1 Million Years? What happens to Scientists that don’t toe the Evolutionary Fairy Tale? A GOOD HELPING OF EVOLUTIONARY BIAS ANYONE. THIS IS WHY I WILL NEVER BELIEVE IN EVOLUTION—EVERYTHING—EVEN SCIENCE IS PC. What a WASTE.