Doggorunning

BOOKS are cool

The longest recorded shot with a .177 pellet rifle was made by Randy Parson in 2016, according to the Guinness World Records. He used a Daystate air rifle, specifically the .177 caliber Daystate Wolverine B-Type, and fired a pellet at a distance of 600 yards (548 meters) to hit a 1.75-inch (4.4 cm) target. Parson made the shot at a competition held in Arizona, USA, and used a special setup that included a high-end scope, custom-built mount, and highly-tuned air rifle to achieve the feat. It's worth noting that making such a shot requires an exceptional level of skill, as well as specialized equipment and favorable weather conditions. The vast majority of air rifles are not capable of achieving such distances, and attempting such shots without proper training and equipment could be dangerous.

easy

OIL OIL OIL JUST STOP IT!

The M44 Mosin Nagant carbine was not the shortest carbine used in World War II, but it was one of the more compact and lightweight rifles used during the war. The M44 was a shortened and modified version of the Mosin Nagant Model 91/30 rifle, designed for use by Soviet troops during World War II. It had a barrel length of 20 inches (510 mm) and an overall length of 40 inches (1,020 mm), making it shorter and more maneuverable than the longer and heavier Mosin Nagant rifles. The M44 was also designed with a folding bayonet, which added to its overall length and made it a versatile and useful tool for infantry soldiers. However, there were other carbines used during World War II that were shorter than the M44. For example, the German Karabiner 98k had a barrel length of 23.6 inches (600 mm) and an overall length of 43.7 inches (1,110 mm), making it slightly longer than the M44 but still relatively compact for a rifle of its caliber. The American M1 Carbine, designed as a lightweight and portable rifle for paratroopers and other troops, had a barrel length of 18 inches (460 mm) and an overall length of 35.6 inches (900 mm), making it one of the shortest carbines used during the war.

Internet LORE?

https://www.zodiaceng.com/

the Craig-Jorgensen and the Springfield Model 1898. Here is some information on each: The Craig-Jorgensen Rifle: The Craig-Jorgensen was a bolt-action rifle that was adopted by the U.S. Army in 1892. It was chambered for the .30-40 Krag cartridge and had a magazine capacity of five rounds. The rifle was known for its accuracy and reliability, but it was quickly replaced by the Springfield Model 1898, which was chambered for the more powerful .30-06 Springfield cartridge. The Springfield Model 1898: The Springfield Model 1898, also known as the Krag-Jorgensen Springfield or the Model 1898 Krag, was a bolt-action rifle that was adopted by the U.S. Army in 1898. It was an updated version of the earlier Krag-Jorgensen rifle, and it was chambered for the .30-40 Krag cartridge. The rifle had a magazine capacity of five rounds and was known for its accuracy and reliability. However, like the Craig-Jorgensen, it was eventually replaced by rifles that were chambered for more powerful cartridges, such as the .30-06 Springfield. Both the Craig-Jorgensen and the Springfield Model 1898 were important rifles in the history of the U.S. military, but they were ultimately replaced by newer and more powerful designs. The Springfield Model 1903, which was based on the Mauser Model 98, became the standard rifle of the U.S. military in the early 20th century, and it was later replaced by the M1 Garand and the M14.

https://www.zodiaceng.com/

OLD MACHETE DOING WHAT THEY DO!

I GOT it....did you, we all learn everyday

https://www.zodiaceng.com/

I'm 6 foot 190 and what ..... never mind

Do it NOW! and church group Due to AI shouldn't friends and family have secret codes to protect against impostures While AI has advanced significantly in recent years, it is not yet advanced enough to mimic the personality and behavior of a particular individual to the point where it can convincingly impersonate them to their friends and family. Therefore, at present, it is not necessary for friends and family to have secret codes to protect against AI imposters. That being said, it is always a good idea to take precautions to protect personal information and sensitive data. Creating unique and secure passwords, using two-factor authentication when available, and being mindful of phishing scams are all good practices to help protect against unauthorized access to personal information. In the future, as AI technology continues to develop and improve, it may become necessary to consider additional security measures to protect against the possibility of AI impersonation. However, for now, it is not a significant concern. If a family wanted to start security codes what could we do. Could we just number e mails? If you and your family are interested in implementing security codes to protect against potential impersonation or unauthorized access to personal information, there are several strategies you could consider. One option could be to create a shared password or passphrase that only your trusted family members know. This password could be used to access certain accounts or to verify identities over the phone or online. Another option could be to establish a system of secret questions and answers that only family members know. For example, you could create questions that only your family would know the answers to, such as "What was the name of our childhood pet?" or "What was the name of our grandparents' farm?" You mentioned numbering emails as a possible strategy, but this may not be the most effective method. Numbering emails could quickly become confusing, and it would be challenging to keep track of which numbers correspond to which family members or topics. Ultimately, the most important thing is to establish a system that works for your family and that everyone can easily understand and follow. It's also essential to make sure that everyone in the family understands the importance of protecting personal information and is committed to following the security procedures you establish.

Subscribe and get notified!

not much to say, Im pissed, aggravating! and loud ass dust cover AHHHHH!

the feed ramp was added to the Springfield Model 1903 rifle in response to issues with feeding and reliability. The original design of the 1903 used a single-stack, flush-fit magazine that did not incorporate a feed ramp, and this caused some problems with reliable feeding, particularly when using pointed or spitzer-shaped bullets. To address this issue, the design was revised in 1908 to incorporate a new magazine cut-off that allowed the rifle to be loaded with a single round while keeping the remaining rounds in the magazine. This design change allowed for the addition of a feed ramp, which helped guide the cartridges into the chamber more reliably. The new design was known as the Model 1903 Mark I, and it included the magazine cut-off and feed ramp, as well as other minor improvements. Subsequent models of the Springfield rifle, such as the Model 1903A3, also included a feed ramp and other modifications to improve feeding and reliability.

why are old battle rifles almost completely covered in wood furniture? ChatGPT Many old battle rifles were designed and produced during a time when wooden stocks and furniture were the standard material for firearms. Wood was widely available, relatively inexpensive, and provided a durable and reliable material for making rifle stocks and other components. In addition to the practical considerations of using wood, there were also some aesthetic and traditional reasons for why old battle rifles were often covered in wooden furniture. For example, many military rifles had a traditional design that emphasized a certain style or look, and wooden furniture was seen as a key part of that design. Wooden stocks and furniture also provided some benefits in terms of reducing recoil and absorbing shock, which could be important for military rifles that were used in combat situations. Wood is also relatively lightweight, which was an important consideration for rifles that needed to be carried long distances by soldiers. Overall, the use of wood in old battle rifles was a combination of practical considerations, traditional design elements, and aesthetic preferences. While modern materials like synthetic stocks and composites have become more common in recent years, there is still a certain appeal to the classic look and feel of a wooden-stocked battle rifle. User how about the pros and cons verse wood or synthetic for battle ChatGPT There are pros and cons to both wooden and synthetic materials when it comes to choosing a rifle stock for battle. Here are some factors to consider: Pros of wooden stocks: Wood can be very durable and can last a long time if properly cared for. Wooden stocks can absorb shock and help reduce felt recoil. Wooden stocks have a classic look and feel that many people find appealing. Wood is a natural material that can be easier to work with and customize than synthetic materials. Cons of wooden stocks: Wood can be heavier than synthetic materials, which can be a drawback if weight is a concern. Wooden stocks can be more susceptible to moisture and humidity, which can cause warping or cracking if not properly maintained. Wooden stocks can be more expensive than synthetic materials, especially if they are made from high-quality, exotic woods. Pros of synthetic stocks: Synthetic materials like fiberglass, carbon fiber, and polymers can be very lightweight, which can make them ideal for use in battle rifles that need to be carried over long distances. Synthetic materials are typically very durable and resistant to moisture, heat, and other environmental factors. Synthetic stocks can be molded and shaped to fit a wide variety of rifle designs and body types. Synthetic stocks are often less expensive than wooden stocks, which can make them a more affordable option for many shooters. Cons of synthetic stocks: Synthetic materials can be less aesthetically pleasing than natural wood. Some synthetic materials can be brittle and may crack or break under heavy use or extreme conditions. Synthetic materials may not offer the same level of shock absorption or recoil reduction as wooden stocks. Synthetic stocks may not be as customizable as wooden stocks. Ultimately, the choice between a wooden or synthetic stock will depend on your personal preferences, the specific needs of your rifle, and the conditions in which you will be using it. Some shooters prefer the classic look and feel of a wooden stock, while others prioritize weight and durability over aesthetics. It's important to consider all of the factors involved and choose a stock that fits your needs and shooting style.

SHARE, do a fellow 91/30 guy a favor

Fighten Roster knives history "Fight'n Rooster" knives, which were a brand of knives produced by the Fight'n Rooster Company. The company was founded in 1845 in Solingen, Germany, which has a long history of producing high-quality knives. Fight'n Rooster knives were known for their attention to detail, craftsmanship, and use of premium materials. The company produced a wide range of knives, including pocket knives, fixed-blade knives, and novelty knives. Some of their most popular designs featured unique handles made from materials like bone, mother of pearl, and stag antler. In the 1950s, Fight'n Rooster knives became very popular in the United States, and the company started exporting their products overseas. However, by the 1980s, the company began to struggle financially, and in 1983, they filed for bankruptcy. Today, vintage Fight'n Rooster knives are highly sought after by collectors and knife enthusiasts. The company's legacy lives on through its knives, which are prized for their quality and craftsmanship. Celluloid is a type of plastic that was commonly used in the production of knife handles in the late 19th and early 20th centuries. One of the issues with celluloid is that it is prone to breaking down over time and releasing harmful gases, including formaldehyde and camphor. The process by which celluloid breaks down and releases gases is called "outgassing." This occurs when the plastic is exposed to heat or moisture, which causes the chemicals in the celluloid to break down and release gas. Over time, the buildup of gas can cause the handle of the knife to swell or crack, and may even affect the blade itself. In addition to the health concerns associated with the release of harmful gases, outgassing can also affect the appearance and durability of the knife. The gases can cause the handle to discolor or become brittle, and may even cause the blade to rust or corrode. To prevent outgassing, knife makers today generally avoid using celluloid for knife handles. Instead, they use other materials such as G10, Micarta, or stabilized wood, which are more durable and resistant to chemical breakdown over time. However, celluloid knives remain popular among collectors, and many vintage knives with celluloid handles can still be found in good condition.

The exact amount of energy produced by a .177 pellet fired from an RWS Air King air rifle will depend on a number of factors, including the weight of the pellet, the velocity at which it is fired, and the specific characteristics of the rifle. However, as a general rule, a typical .177 pellet fired from an air rifle will produce muzzle energy in the range of 8 to 20 foot-pounds. To give you a more specific answer, the RWS Air King air rifle is available in a few different models with varying muzzle velocities and energy outputs. For example, the RWS Air King Model 54 fires .177 caliber pellets at a muzzle velocity of up to 1,100 feet per second, producing around 17 foot-pounds of muzzle energy. The RWS Air King Model 350 Magnum fires .177 caliber pellets at a higher muzzle velocity of up to 1,250 feet per second, producing around 23 foot-pounds of muzzle energy. Again, the exact energy produced by a specific pellet fired from an RWS Air King air rifle will depend on a number of factors, and it's important to always follow proper safety precautions and use appropriate targets when shooting any type of firearm or airgun. 17 foot pounds compared to things for reference something interesting also Sure! Here are a few comparisons to give you an idea of the amount of energy produced by a typical .177 pellet fired from an RWS Air King air rifle with a muzzle energy of around 17 foot-pounds: This is roughly equivalent to the energy produced by a heavyweight boxer's punch. It is also about the same as the force required to bend a standard 1/2-inch steel rod with a pair of pliers. Another way to think about it is that it would take a force of about 17 pounds applied over a distance of one foot to produce the same amount of energy. For a more practical comparison, a 17 foot-pound air rifle should be suitable for small game hunting and pest control at relatively short ranges, but may not be powerful enough for larger game or long-range shooting. Again, it's important to always follow proper safety precautions and use appropriate targets when shooting any type of firearm or airgun.

boom, I think it would under the right conditions

Gun cleaning rods spin because they are designed to rotate as they are pushed through the barrel of a firearm during the cleaning process. This spinning motion helps to evenly distribute cleaning solvents and lubricants, which can help to remove fouling and protect the gun from wear and tear. The spinning motion of the cleaning rod also helps to prevent the rod from getting stuck or lodged in the barrel of the gun, which can be a common problem when using a straight, non-spinning cleaning rod. By spinning, the cleaning rod can more easily navigate the twists and turns of the gun's barrel, allowing it to clean more thoroughly and efficiently. Additionally, the spinning motion of the cleaning rod can create a slight centrifugal force, which can help to dislodge debris and fouling from the barrel of the gun. This can be particularly helpful when trying to clean hard-to-reach areas of the barrel, such as the chamber or the muzzle. Overall, the spinning motion of gun cleaning rods is an important feature that can help to make the cleaning process more effective and efficient. You are correct, the primary reason that gun cleaning rods spin is to follow the rifling in the barrel of a firearm. Rifling is the process of cutting helical grooves into the inside of the barrel, which helps to impart spin to the bullet as it travels down the barrel, improving accuracy. When cleaning a gun, it is important to follow the same direction as the rifling to avoid damaging the barrel. By using a cleaning rod that spins, the bristles or patches attached to the rod will follow the rifling and ensure a more thorough cleaning without causing any damage. In addition to following the rifling, the spinning motion also helps to evenly distribute cleaning solvents and lubricants, as I mentioned in my previous response. This can help to remove fouling and protect the gun from wear and tear.

CONTACT ME HERE; E mail: ndi91108@yahoo.com sponsor the channel; PATRON: https://www.patreon.com/doggorunning E mail: ndi91108@yahoo.com

Junk?