SEAL of Approval: Blackhawk Down

THE CONSPIRACY THEORY THAT EVEN PROGRESSIVES ARE SCARED TO DISCUSS

According to First Liberty Institute, the attorneys for the U.S. Navy SEALs in the current litigation in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas, they have brought a total of three cases all the way to the United States Supreme Court since their founding in 1972, when one retired Army Ranger and the most junior commissioned officer to have ever served as the Operations Officer for all U.S. Army strategic counterintelligence in the continental United States (CONUS), was just beginning the second grade, and in just the two years of pandemic, he has had three cases docketed at the Supreme Court, and he possesses neither a law degree nor a license to practice law, but he did serve as a Legal Specialist with the 75th Ranger Regiment, because somebody has to handle the legal work involved in a rapid deployment lite infantry special operations unit, and when you are available for deployment anywhere in the world in less than 18 hours, it tends to involve an understanding of even international law, status of forces agreements and treaties.

Last Friday, the Supreme Court handed down a sweeping decision in Austin v. U.S. Navy SEALs 1-26, an application raised on the "shadow docket" for prejudgment relief in an interlocutory appeal, which is quite a lot of law to try to understand for a novice, because that means that the action is currently in three courts: the original trial court in the Northern District of Texas, the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals and the U.S. Supreme Court.

However, under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 24, a person enjoys a right of intervention, which can be a conditional right or an unconditional right, to essentially be a Good Samaritan, parachuting into somebody else's case that might be in a bit of trouble to have the court decide a material issue that effects both their case and yours. And we just happen, based upon intelligence and special operations experience, to have the one shot-one kill target solution on the vaccines mandates, and, you may have noticed that you did not hear about it on CNN, in a briefing at the Heritage Foundation, at CPAC, from Family Research Council or any other conservative think tank or press outlet, and that should be one of those things to make you ask yourself exactly why.