Iranian Woman Has A Fiery Message To The Inbreeding Of Muslim World On Sharia Law!

A Real Iranian Woman Has Truth Fiery A Message To The Inbreeding Leaders Of Muslim World And Maybe Stop All The Be-Heading In The World Under The Sharia Law Today! "Islam Is A Religion Of Justice And Not Of Peace Can Someone Pleases Help Us Before We All Are Dead Before July 04, 2026? Good Evening ("Kafir") Infidels... Allahu Akbar... "God Is The Greatest" So This A Wake Up Call To All America Muslim Women Who Are Still Alive Today.

Show more

Nearly 50 years later, Muslim women are still protesting. So much so that defying hijab laws can be punishable by death. And in Iran and now in America, freedom comes at a deadly cost. A woman's choice to unveil can now lead to flogging, prison, and even execution. The new hijab law enforces harsh penalties for those who defy strict dress codes.

Yes Islam Has Officially Taken Over The People's Republic Of New York City-State Americastan Is Under Sharia Laws. The Real Zohran Mamdani Victory Speech... Death To America ? Yes Sexually Assaulted And Grooming Gang See You Seen? See No Evil, Hear No Evil, Speak No Evil There Is No Christian Freedom Of Religion Left Today In America ?

Islam A Religion Of Justice And Not Of Peace... All White Non-Muslims Our ("Kafir") Infidels Period - https://rumble.com/v72k824-islam-a-religion-of-justice-and-not-of-peace...-all-white-non-muslims-our-k.html

Islam A Religion Of Justice And Not Of Peace... The Dangers Of Radical Islam In 5 Minute Video... Anyone Who Ever Leave Islam Will Die... So All White America Non-Muslims Our ("Kafir") Infidels Period Today July 04, 2026 Will Go Down In Jihad History Death To USA. Some 92% Of All Muslims Alive Today USA Believe That Jihad Is Primarily A Call To Holy War Against All Skin Color Of Any Nonbelievers, Sinners, Heretics, And Apostates.

Zohran Mamdani's Victory Speech 11/04-2025 Now Confirmed Everything We Feared About...? Yes Close To One Million Muslims Already Living In NYC Right Now. And Planning To Move In 2 Million More Muslims By Dec. 31, 2026... As Millions Of Jews, Transgender And Whites Persons Start Moving Out Fast With There Money.

Yes Islam Has Officially Taken Over The People's A Republic Of New York City-State And Is Now Under Islamic And Sharia Laws A Democratic Control Socialist Communist Country... Soon To Be Muslim Hell Hole As Planned For Americastan And We Now Have The Right To Kill You Under Islamic Law And Sharia Laws Today. So New York City-State 11/04/2025 Is Now A New Country Called We The Non-White Citizen's Of The People's Republic Of Americastan 2026.

Yes I Will Take My Oath Of Office With My Hand On The Quran (Not The Bible) & Up Hold "One Nation Under Allah" & Not To Uphold Any American Constitution Because Everyone Know Its Is Void Now. As We Live And Work Under A U.S. Government Is Under A Corporation And Maritime Laws and To See Establish Sharia In America.

Zohran Mamdani Said As My First Act As Your New Muslim Mayor Of New York City Of Americastan January 02, 2026 I Hear By Order That In The Name Of Allah We The Muslim Of U.S.A. Below:

So American Pledge of Allegiance Is Now To Be Replaced in Arabic, replacing "One nation under God," with "One nation under Allah". And All New U.S. Coins To Be Replaced from "In God We Trust" to In The Name Of Allah".

Iran and Now U.S.A. New York City: UN experts call for strict new hijab law to be repealed ? Iranian and now America women and girls now face prison terms of up to 15 years and possible death sentences for failing to wear a hijab, through a new strict law on religious dress and behavior that was due to take effect world wide.

Independent UN Human Rights Council-appointed experts said in a statement that it represents a fundamental attack on women’s rights. The legislation, which applies to children as young as 12, combines severe criminal penalties with mandatory citizen surveillance and systematic enforcement across all sectors of society, the experts added.

The Law on Protecting the Family through the Promotion of the Culture of Chasity and Hijab, represents what experts describe as “an intensification of State control over women’s bodies in Iran and a further assault on women’s rights and freedoms”.

Soaring In The Polls As Pauline Hanson’s Burqa Act Was Justified After Bill Was Denied For Debate - https://rumble.com/v72mlk6-soaring-in-the-polls-as-pauline-hansons-burqa-act-was-justified-after-bill-.html

Sky News host Rowan Dean defends One Nation Leader Pauline Hanson’s burqa stunt because she has been “shut down” and “denied” the opportunity to debate the wearing of the burqa for Muslim women.

“There was a veritable conga line of cowards this week lining up to condemn Pauline Hanson's burqa stunt this week in parliament. I say cowards because not only were they not prepared to hold a debate in parliament about banning the burqa, but they roundly turned on and condemned the one politician who was brave enough to propose the debate,” Mr Dean said.

“The stunt came after that denial, not before. At that point, it went from being a stunt to a legitimate form of protest, no different, whether one likes it or not.

“Pauline's protest was entirely justified. And I have no doubt that not only will it attract even more support to her party, but also the vehement reaction by Coalition politicians against it will drive even more conservatives away from the Liberal Party. “

Existing restrictions
The new legislation expands existing restrictions, targeting women and girls who fail to wear a hijab in both physical and online spaces. While the hijab requirements were already mandatory under Iran’s Islamic Penal Code, this new law introduces dramatically harsher consequences.

Violations can now result in extended prison sentences of up to 15 years and substantially increased fines. Most concerning to human rights experts is the provision allowing judges to impose the death penalty under the charge of “corruption on earth”.

Systematic impact on Iranian society
The law’s reach extends far beyond individual enforcement, embedding mandatory veiling and “culture of chastity” principles deep within Iranian society, the independent experts said.

Educational curricula, training programs and public information campaigns must now incorporate these concepts, effectively creating a State-sanctioned value system that experts warn will severely limit freedom of expression and belief.

“The law constitutes clear violation of fundamental human rights, legal norms and principles, including women’s rights to equality, freedom of expression, religion and belief, bodily autonomy, liberty, security and privacy, “the experts emphasised.

‘Climate of fear’
Additionally, the law’s approach to enforcement transforms ordinary citizens into agents of the State. The legislation requires individuals, families, and businesses to report instances of unveiling while also mandating extensive use of technology for enforcement purposes.

“These requirements will create a climate of fear and distrust among individuals and communities,” the experts warned, noting that severe economic punishments would likely hit vulnerable populations and groups including children, young persons, and social media users.

Long term consequences
The experts said that the enforcement will likely escalate violence against women and girls while further embedding systematic gender-based discrimination.

Harsh penalties along with citizen surveillance and institutional enforcement creates what they describe as a comprehensive system of gender-based persecution.

Brigitte Gabriel Speech About Radical Islamic State Of Americastan Never Wanted You To Hear Today - https://rumble.com/v728j92-brigitte-gabriel-speech-about-radical-islamic-state-of-americastan-never-wa.html

Brigitte Gabriel Speech About Radical Islamic State 1400 Years of Conquest, Slavery and Murder-Genocide Provides A Facts-Based Timeline Of Events In World History Since The Introduction Of Islam. 1,400 Years Of Christian/Islamic Struggle: An Analysis For Reader Today. We have failed our children. Thus the lack of patriotism we are seeing. I agree with this woman. I admire her bravery for speaking in public. May God bless her. I fact checked a few things said by her video dead on correct!

I was very disappointed to see that U.S. News would publish a clearly false article, adopting the world's clearly false, politically correct (PC) view of the place of the Crusades in history. What makes it even worse, the article hides its views under the additional headline falsehood, "The Truth About the Epic Clash Between Christianity and Islam."

“We call upon the Government of Iran to immediately repeal the Hijab and Chasity Law and all other discriminatory legislation that perpetuates gender-based persecution,” the experts said, whilst confirming that they are in contact with the Government on this matter.

Special Rapporteurs and other independent rights experts are not UN staff, receive no salary for their work and have no connection to any government. They serve in their individual capacity.

The hijab is mine': Muslim women take back their rights from US law enforcement... Women in US have been repeatedly forced to take their hijabs off in police custody, but a series of cases show that fighting back is having an impact Police officers stand by as people take part in a rally called "I Am A Muslim Too", on 19 February 2017 in New York City.

Alaa Massri was just 18 years old when she was arrested.

It was the summer of 2020. Hundreds of thousands of people across the United States were protesting against the murder of George Floyd, an unarmed Black man who was killed while being arrested for allegedly using a counterfeit bill.

Massri helped organise some of the protests in Miami, Florida. She proudly wore her hijab - as she had for the past 12 years - grabbed a megaphone, marched, and demanded justice.

More than 10,000 people were arrested during the George Floyd protests condemning racism and police brutality across the US - and Massri was one of them.

But what set Massri's arrest apart from the others was that she was asked to remove her hijab for the booking photo. Massri explained to officers that the head covering was a religious obligation and that she would not take it off. But no one listened. Instead, an officer yanked the hijab off her head and the photo was taken.

Now Massri’s hijab-less picture was out in cyberspace. The hair she had carefully hidden from the world began circulating on social media, with people and spam accounts harassing her. Some even tried to sell the mugshot for thousands of dollars.

“I felt naked. I felt completely stripped of all control,” Massri told Middle East Eye while recalling what she felt at that moment. "I felt so blatantly disrespected."

“[The hijab] is my protection. This is something I cherish, and to have it just ripped and yanked off with no regard or respect? It felt like all my power was gone.”

Massri’s story is just one of many. There are no federal laws to protect a woman's right to continue wearing a hijab when arrested, and no laws to prevent officers from removing it or asking for it to be removed.

Considered to be obligatory in Islam, the hijab is a head covering worn by Muslim women who choose to wear it. It can be a symbol of modesty and privacy or cultural identity deeply rooted in Islamic traditions. Many wear it around men who are not considered their "mahram" - a male family member with whom marriage is considered unlawful. Therefore, if asked to be removed in front of strangers, it is a violation of their religious and civic rights.

“It was not just this piece of fabric that covered my hair. It was a symbol of my devotion to my religion. It was a symbol of my devotion to understanding that beauty wasn't just physical and materialistic. To have that stripped from you was something almost unbearable, "Massri said.

Every state in the US has its own policy in dealing with religious coverings during arrests. After Massri’s arrest, over 330,000 people signed a petition denouncing her treatment by the county corrections department.

In a statement to The Miami Herald in response to the criticism of its handling of the case, the department said it could “accommodate inmates who wear head coverings for religious reasons” and noted that it was reviewing the matter “to ensure compliance with our policies”.

Massri said she is sure something clicked because five months after her arrest, she got a call from a friend at the county jail. He told her he was with a Muslim hijab-wearing woman who had just been arrested. He told her that they did not take off her hijab.

“I'm grateful that I was able to fight back enough to where something good came out of it,” Massri said.

And in November of the same year, two Muslim women won their own battles over the issue in New York City.

A 'systematic violation'
In 2017, Jamilla Clark and Arwa Aziz were arrested. Both were arrested six months apart but faced the same ordeal. They were asked to remove their hijabs for their booking photos. Surrounded by men, they both said no. Then, they relented.

In 2018, they got together and filed a class-action civil rights lawsuit arguing that the New York Police Department’s (NYPD) “policies for photographing arrestees violate the religious rights of any civilian forced to remove religious head coverings that leave the face unobstructed. It could apply to the hijab of a Muslim, the skullcap or wig of an Orthodox Jew or the turban of a Sikh”.

In 2020, in an effort to settle the lawsuit, the NYPD agreed to change its policy and allow religious observers to be photographed in head coverings so long as their faces were left unobstructed. Under the terms of the settlement agreement, the NYPD was to revise its patrol guide to reflect the new policy and train officers.

The settlement stated that exceptions could occur during contraband or weapons inspections, or if an officer perceives that the headgear poses a threat to the safety of others.

Albert Fox Cahn is a lawyer who represents Clark and Aziz. While the police department changed its policy, he says the women are still fighting to seek damages to hold the NYPD accountable for past violations.

“When we see a large dollar figure attached to this systematic violation of the First Amendment, it will make other police departments think twice about policies that force removal of religious wear,” Cahn told Middle East Eye.

In 2017, the city of Long Beach, California, agreed to pay $85,000 to settle a federal lawsuit filed by a Muslim woman whose hijab was pulled off by a male officer while she was in police custody.

Her lawsuit, filed in 2016, prompted the Long Beach Police Department to reverse its policy barring people from wearing religious head coverings.

In February 2018, the NYPD settled a case filed by three Muslim women for separate incidents concerning the forcible removal of their hijabs, including during mugshots while in custody.

A month later in New York, another Muslim woman settled a fourth case against the department on similar grounds. In total, the department paid out at least $265,000 for the four incidents.

But while there is progress being made in police departments throughout the country, in other parts of the US, women are still being forced to remove their hijabs. Just last month, a Muslim woman from Grand Rapids, Michigan, sued the Kent County Sheriff’s Office because she was forced to remove her hijab for a booking photo.

Cahn explained that there’s an interesting relationship between the criminal justice system and the religious obligations of people.

The First Amendment of the US Consitution protects several basic freedoms in the US, including freedom of religion, freedom of speech, freedom of the press, the right to assemble, and the right to petition the government.

In 1990, a high-profile case, Employment Division v Smith, led to the Supreme Court ruling that the First Amendment does not protect individuals engaging in illegal acts as part of a religious ceremony.

Following the ruling, in 1993 Congress passed the Religious Freedom Restoration Act, which "ensures that interests in religious freedom are protected".

And in 2000, Congress passed the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act (RLUIPA), which prohibits the government from imposing a "substantial burden" on prisoners' religious practices unless officials can show a compelling need for the restrictions.

“Prisons have huge amounts of power over those they hold in their custody. What RLUIPA tries to do is make sure that power is not abused in a way to systematically target religious beliefs and practices,” Cahn said.

“Which is why we are able to fight for these women,” he said.

A counterintuitive act
When a person is arrested, a booking photo (or mugshot, colloquially) is taken of them to identify them and keep a record. Women who wear the hijab are generally identified by their hijabs. They wear their hijabs in their driver's license photos, passport photos, and in public when they leave their homes.

So it’s counterintuitive when law enforcement force women to take off their hijabs, Aida Shyef al-Kadi, told Middle East Eye.

In 2013, Kadi received a traffic citation for driving without her licence. In June of that year, she missed a court date because she said she had to take her daughter to the hospital for an emergency. Soon after, a judge issued a warrant for her arrest.

After she turned herself in, she said the Ramsey County officers told her to take off her hijab and abaya (loose-fitting garment some women wear over their clothes). She said she objected because there were men present. But once she objected, she said she was pushed into a holding cell where she was asked to take her hijab off in front of a male officer.

Kadi said she agreed to remove her hijab for a booking photo after being promised the picture wouldn’t be released to the public. In the meantime, she claimed that the officers gave her a bedsheet and then a T-shirt to use as a hijab. She was kept in her cell for 23 hours for “argumentative behavior".

The next day, when she was released, she found that her booking photo had become a public record and was available for release upon request. So, she filed a lawsuit, and a settlement was reached.

In 2014, Ramsey County updated its policies to ensure that Muslim women who wear the hijab won’t be forced to remove their head coverings in front of men. The county now offers Muslim women jail-approved headscarves.

As part of the settlement, the county Sheriff’s Office has to train corrections officers on how to offer religious accommodations to those arrested.

The county also agreed to destroy hard and electronic versions of her booking photo. In 2019, Kadi received a $120,000 settlement from the county.

She told Middle East Eye that a lot of people, especially Muslims, questioned her on why she decided to pursue such a long battle. But to her, the answer is simple.

“The hijab is mine. It belongs to me. It’s my freedom. It’s my right. It’s my faith. It's mine,” she said. “I am a Muslim and the only way you can identify me from a non-Muslim is by my hijab. It’s mine and so I fought for it. It was like a war. They wanted to take something that belonged to me just because I made a mistake.”

For Massri, her relationship with the hijab became more complicated. So complicated, that she no longer wears one.

“I felt a lot of guilt for not being strong enough in defending myself. I know it’s jail and I can’t really defend myself. But there was so much guilt. I couldn’t keep it on," she said.

After the protests, Massri went viral on social media. People were stalking her and breaking into her car, and she felt overwhelmed. Every day when she would look in the mirror, she did not recognise herself and she felt like she didn’t deserve to wear the hijab anymore.

“I didn't know who that girl was looking back at me. Every time I’d look in the mirror, I would just remember the power they had to take my hijab off,” she said.

For Massri, the hijab was a part of her body. It was not something she felt anyone could control.

“So taking it off myself, I felt like I regained control. And I regained power in the sense that no one else could take it off besides me. It was mine."

Islamophobia in American policing
If removing hijabs for booking photos to identify women is counterintuitive, then why are they asked to do it?

Cahn believes a lot of it has to do with Islamophobia being intertwined with so many aspects of American policing.

He explained that we see such examples in the NYPD, for example, when the department systematically targeted Muslims by surveilling them, othering the community in the process.

In 2011, an Associated Press investigation found that the NYPD religiously profiled and surveilled NYC Muslims in an attempt to find "radicalization", mapping out communities, conducting video surveillance, recruiting informants, and generating intelligence databases since 2002.

“We see it endemically throughout policing that oftentimes Islam is viewed through a lens of suspicion. We see other cities, and not I'm not talking about just New York City, that have policies that are clearly designed to target Muslim residents and punish them."

Kadi remembers the moment she was asked to take off her hijab. She said she saw so much anger in the officer.

“It felt like they were angry at the sight of my hijab,” she said.

She said she remembers the officer telling her that other Muslim women who get arrested don't care about the hijab. She said she had tried explaining to them that not every woman has to care.

“It felt like they were not accepting of others who are not like them. They couldn’t see America's diversity. They couldn’t see me as somebody.”

Massri believes it’s a power trip. She believes that the officers who take hijabs off want to take pleasure in having that much power.

“It’s about them knowing they can hide behind that badge and nothing will happen to them,” she said.

She explained that in jail, there were no clocks or windows to tell the time of day. “So they do this on purpose. At the end of the day, it’s just to strip you of your humanity.”

Niqab vs Hijab vs Burka What Is the Difference?
The main difference between a hijab and a burka lies in how much they cover.

The hijab is a headscarf that covers the head, neck, and shoulders but leaves the face completely visible. On the other hand, the burka gives covering the entire body including face and some times hands, with a mesh screen for vision.

The Islamic world is experiencing a rise in women wearing the burqa claiming it to be part of the Islamic dress code. Whether it is worn by choice or force is open to debate as very few women are able to, or prefer not to voice an opinion on the matter. Those who have, generally argue against the compulsory (by law as in Afghanistan) wearing of this garment with a minority claiming the right to wear it citing Quranic and prophetic instruction.

A Burqa is an outer garment worn by women in Islamic societies for the purpose of concealing their bodies and/or face. It is mostly worn when a woman leaves her home and is compelled to wear it until she returns.

The burqa is worn throughout Middle Eastern nations and most Muslim nations around the world, with a few liberal or democratic governments being less strict about its use. One such famous example is Turkey, where secular ideas prevail and give people the freedom to choose. Meanwhile, in stricter nations, women are forced to wear the burqa; failure to do so can result in beatings, harassment or worse. Obviously a woman wears a burqa but more specifically, conservative practicing Muslims wear it. Girls are not mandated to wear a burqa until they reach puberty but this notion is not practiced, as girls as young as six are made to wear the burqa to physically and mentally prepare them for adult life.

Burqa falls under the category of Hijab. This is an Arabic word which means to veil or cover and refers to a woman’s head and body covering. In Saudi Arabia, women wear a loose robe called abaya and a face veil called niqab, while in nations like Tunisia or Turkey; Muslim women tend to wear only a headscarf. In Iran, they take a step further and the “fashion police” mandate all women to wear loose clothing – preferably a black or white robe – when going out, women are also supposed to wear either a full face veil or scarf. One of the extremes of burqa is the Afghan burqa, which was enforced by the Taliban. This burqa covers the entire body in loose clothing with the face (including eyes) being covered with only a grille for the women to look through.

The Dress Code in the Quran for women

Introduction:

Before presenting the Quranic rules for women's dress, it is essential to be reminded of the following:

1- The Quran is the only source of law authorized by God (6:114).

2- The Quran is complete and fully detailed (6:38, 6:114, 16:89 and 12:111).

3- God calls on His true believers to make sure not to fall into the trap of shirk by following the words of the scholars instead of the words of God (9:31).

4- God condemns those who prohibit what He has not prohibited (5:87, 6:140, 6:150, 7:32, 10:59, and 16:116).

5- Those who invent laws that were never authorized by God, and also those who follow such laws, are guilty of committing shirk:

Or do they have partners who legislate for them of the religion what God did not authorize? Had it not been for a decisive Word, they would have already been judged. Indeed, the transgressors shall have a painful punishment. 42:21

The words 'shuraka' (partners) indicate that those who commit such sins are in fact setting partners with God in His exclusive right of lawmaking.

The command to follow the Quran alone is spelt out clearly in the Quran, see: Why Quran alone

The following are the Quranic guidelines for women's dress:

First Rule: The Best Garment

O Children of Adam, We have brought down to you garments to cover your bodies, as well as for adornment, yet the garment of reverence is the best. These are some of God's signs. May you take heed. 7:26

Revering God is the most important guideline for women when they choose their dress. The righteous reverent woman will know that God is always watching her, she will therefore dress modestly and in line with God's requirements for decency and morality. Any woman knows full well what clothes are considered decent and what clothes are revealing, she will not need to be told. This is why God set the rule of reverence as the first rule.

Second Rule: Cover your Cleavage

The second rule can be found in 24:31. God commanded women to cover their cleavage. Before reviewing 24:31, it is necessary to address some key Quranic words which have been subject to manipulation by those who enforce non-Quranic dress rules on women. The two words in question in 24:31 'hijab' and 'khimar'.

The word 'hijab' in Islamic practice vs its use in the Quran

Hijab is the term used by many Muslim women today to describe their head cover. The Arabic word 'hijab' literally means barrier or veil. Other meanings for the word 'hijab' include screen, cover(ing), mantle, curtain, drapes, partition, division, divider and barrier.

The word 'hijab' is used in 7 Quranic verses. The verses are: 7:46, 17:45, 19:17, 33:53, 38:32, 41:5, 42:51 and 17:45.

None of these occurrences of the word 'hijab' mean a head cover for women.

God knows that there will come a time when Muslims will use the word 'hijab' to invent a dress code that God Himself never authorized. God used the word 'hijab' ahead of them just as He used the word 'hadith' ahead of them in (45:6).

Historical Background:

While many Muslims call 'hijab' an Islamic dress code, they are in fact oblivious of the fact that the concept of 'hijab' has nothing to do with Islam, nor with the Quran.

In fact, the 'hijab' is an old Jewish tradition that infiltrated the hadith books like many innovations that contaminated Islam through the hadith. Any student of Jewish traditions would know that the head cover for the Jewish woman is encouraged by the rabbis and religious leaders.

Religious Jewish women still cover their heads most of the time, especially in the synagogues, at weddings and religious festivities. This Jewish tradition is a cultural not a religious one. The 'hijab' was observed by women of the civilizations that preceded the Jews and was passed down to the Jewish culture.

Some Christian women cover their heads on many religious occasions while the nuns cover their heads all the time. The tradition of covering the head was practiced thousands of years before Muslim scholars claimed the 'hijab' as a Muslim dress code.

The traditional Arabs, of all religions, Jews, Christians and Muslims used to wear 'hijab', not because of Islam, but because of tradition. In Saudi Arabia for example, all men cover their heads, not because of Islam but because of tradition.

North Africa is known for its Tribe (Tuareg) in which it is the Muslim men who wear the 'hijab' and not the women, a case where the tradition is reversed.

In brief, 'hijab' is a traditional dress and has nothing to do with Islam or religion. In certain areas of the world, men are the ones who wear the 'hijab' while in others women do.

Mixing religion with tradition is a form of idol worship since it implies setting up other sources of religious laws besides the law of God.

The word 'khimar' in the Quran:

The word 'khimar' can be found in the Quran in 24:31. While the first basic rule of the Dress Code for Muslim women can be found in 7:26, the second rule of the dress code for women can be found in 24:31. Some Muslims quote verse 31 of sura 24 as containing the 'hijab', or head cover, by pointing to the word, khumoorihinna, (their khimars), forgetting that God already used the word 'hijab', several times in the Quran, but none to mean head cover. Those who are not shackled by pre-conceptions will easily see that there is no command in 24:31 for women to cover their heads. The word 'khimar' does not mean 'hijab' or head cover. Those who quote this verse usually add the words "head cover" or the word "veil" after the word 'khumoorihinna', usually between brackets. These additions are their own words not the words of God and they are clearly added to the text to imply a meaning not found in God's words. The words of 24:31 are:

And say to the believing women to lower their gaze and to guard their private parts, and not to show their zinat except that of it which is normally shown. They shall also cover their cleavage with their khimars. They shall not show their zinat except in the presence of their husbands, their fathers, the fathers of their husbands, their sons, the sons of their husbands, their brothers, the sons of their brothers, the sons of their sisters, other women, what their right hands possess, the male attendants who have no sexual desire and the children who are yet to attain awareness of women's nakedness. They shall not strike their feet so as to reveal details of their hidden zinat. Repent to God all of you, O believers, so that you may succeed. 24:31

The Arabic word 'zinat' means adornments. In the context of 24:31, it refers to women's bodily beauty spots that carry sexual appeal.

The Arabic word khimar means cover. Any cover can be called a khimar, such as a curtain or a garment. A tablecloth that covers the top of a table can also be called a khimar. A blanket can be called a khimar, and so on. The word 'khamr', is used in the Quran for intoxicants. It is a derivative of the word khimar. Both words mean: that which covers. The khimar covers a window, a body, a table and so on, while khamr is that which covers the mind. Traditional translators, obviously influenced by hadith and culture, claim that khimar in 24:31 has only one meaning, and that is the head cover. Thus, they mislead women into believing that 24:31 commands them to cover their hair.In 24:31 God instructs women to use their khimar (cover/garment) to cover their cleavage. Covering the chest can be done by a dress, coat, shawl, shirt, blouse, scarf and so on.

Third Rule: Not to reveal their zinat

The third rule can also be found in 24:31. Here God commands women not to reveal their 'zinat' except what is normally apparent such as the head (face and hair), arms, lower legs, etc.

Not to show their zinat except that of it which is normally shown.

This expression may sound vague to many because they have not understood the mercy of God. God used the general phrase "what is normally shown" in order to allow women the freedom to decide, at different occasions, what is shown of her body. Righteous women will always make the correct decision so as to conform to the general code of morality, and also according to the time, place and occasion.

The great wisdom of God in granting women this flexible concession can be witnessed every day and in every place. The following example demonstrates the application of this concession:

A woman attending the masjid for prayers, or attending a funeral would wish to wear fairly conservative clothes, but a woman playing sports for example, would wish to wear simple light clothes that do not hinder movement. If God did not grant this merciful concession in 24:31, it would mean that all women would have to wear identical clothes at all occasions.

The word 'zeenatahunna' (beauty spots) in this verse refers to the woman's beauty spots which carry a sexual connotation, examples are: thighs, breasts and back side. At the end of the verse, God tells the women not to strike with their feet to show their 'zeenatahunna'. The way a woman strikes her feet while walking can expose the outlines of certain parts of the body.

For a more detailed analysis of 24:31 please go to: Corruption of 24:31

Fourth Rule: Lengthen your outer garments

O you prophet, tell your wives and your daughters and the women of the believers to lower their outer garments. This is better so that they will be recognized and not harmed. God is Forgiver, Merciful. 33:59

When we reflect on the above words, we would understand the great wisdom of God. In this verse, God, deliberately said that women should lower their outer garments (dress, skirt, jalabiya, etc), but did not say any precise details of how much to lower. God could have said to lower their garments to their ankles or to their mid-calf or to their knees, but He did not. God knows that we will be living in different communities and have different cultures. Thus God left the exact amount of lowering of a woman's dress for women to decide, as long as righteousness is always maintained.

Some scholars have claimed that the Quran commands women to cover all their bodies and not just lower their garments, for the details please see: Manipulation of 33:59.

Relaxing the Dress Code:

Within a family setting, God put no hardship on women, permitting them to relax their dress code. This is apparent from the words of 24:31 (above). In addition, elderly women who no longer expect to get married can also relax their dress code:

Regarding the elderly post-menstrual women who no longer seek marriage, there is no blame upon them for relaxing their clothes, provided they do not flaunt their zinat. Indeed, maintaining morality is better for them. God is Hearer, Knowledgeable. 24:60

Reply to those who claim that a Muslim woman should be covered except for her face:

Many Muslim scholars have invented extreme rules for women's dress which are not found in the Quran. Some say that women should be totally covered except for their faces, while others who are even more extreme, say that all women must be covered from head to toe except for two holes for the eyes to see.

1- There are no words anywhere in the Quran which command women to cover all their bodies. Those who preach such un-Quranic rules cannot find words in the Quran to justify this extremity, so they manipulate various words in 24:31 and 33:59 to justify the falsehood.

2- The fact that God says in 24:31 to specifically cover the bosom indicates clearly that there are other parts of the woman’s body that do not have to be covered. To elaborate on the indication of the words in 24:31, let us ponder on the following example:

Think of your house and in it, you have a garden. You have a gardener who comes to look after your garden. One day you tell the gardener: please water the area under the big tree and also water the back of the garden.

What does this example tell us? It tells us that since you specified only areas to be watered, then this is a clear indication that there will be other areas in the garden that are not to be watered. If you wanted the gardener to water the whole garden you would have said: Please water the whole garden.

When we apply this example to the issue of women’s dress code in the Quran, the same principle applies. If God wanted the whole body of the woman to be covered, God would not have specified the chest to be covered but would have issued a command for all the body to be covered. But since God specifies certain parts of the woman’s body to be covered, then there are other parts that do not have to be covered, as long as they are not beauty spots of a sexual connotation and as long as righteousness in dress is maintained.

3- The command to "lower their garment" also proves that the woman is not commanded to be covered from head to toe. For if that was the case and women must be covered down to their toes, there would be no meaning to "lower their garments". How can a woman lower a garment that is already down to the ground?

What does The Quran say about the burqa?

First of all it depends upon who you ask. There is disagreement in Islamic circles as to what extent Quran advocates the wearing of the burqa. However, The Quran does not specifically mention the burqa or tell women to wear such extremely confining clothes. Instead, it instructs men and women to dress and behave modestly in society (24:31), which the Ulama or “Scholars” do agree upon. Modern day Muslims base their authority regarding the burqa on the hadith or collected traditions of life in the days of prophet Muhammad. It is important to note here that these “collected traditions” have no place in Islam, (please see relevant articles on this site). Most followers of these traditions know little of their origins or authenticity. For the thousands of traditions attributed to the Prophet only one bears notable credibility:

“Do not write down anything I say except the Quran. Whoever has written something other than Quran let him destroy it.” (Ahmed Ibn Hanbal, Vol. 1, page 171 also Sahih Muslim, Book 42, Number 7147).

With contradiction and confusion thrown up by the hadith and “scholars of Islam” let us consider what the Quran says and which sheds light on the issue of the burqa:

[33:52] No women are lawful for you beyond this, nor for you to replace them with other wives even if you are attracted by their beauty, with the exception of what your right hand possesses. You must be content with those already made lawful to you. God is watchful over all things.

The significance of the underlined words is that they confirm that God never commanded women to cover their faces. If the Burqa was a command from God, as some claim, then how can any man be attracted to a woman's beauty (as in 33:52)? Naturally the woman's beauty, which God is speaking about, is the beauty of her face. If the Burqa was a command from God then the words in 33:52 would become meaningless and obsolete.

Now let us review what the Quran says about the topic of a dress code.

For women: Cover your chest (24:31); Lengthen your garments (33:59) and for both sexes; The BEST garment is righteousness and modest conduct (7:26).

The word burqa is not to be found anywhere in the Quran, but as it falls under the heading of hijab which is used in Quran we should explore its use. The Arabic word hijab can be translated into veil or yashmak. Other meanings for the word include screen, barrier, cover(ing), mantle, curtain, drapes, partition, division, divider etc.

The word hijab appears in the Qur’an seven times, five of them as “hijab” and twice as “hijaban”. See 7:46, 17:45, 19:17, 33:53, 38:32, 41:5, 42:51. None of these “hijab” words are used in the Quran in reference to what the traditional Muslims call today “the dress code for Muslim woman”. Hijab in the Qur’an has nothing to do with a woman’s dress code.

[7:46] A hijab (barrier) separates them, while the Purgatory is occupied by people who recognise each side by their looks. They will call the dwellers of Paradise: "Peace be upon you." They did not enter (Paradise) through wishful thinking.

[42:51] No human being can communicate with God except through inspiration, or from behind a hijaban (barrier), or by sending a messenger through whom He reveals what He wills. He is the Most High, Most Wise.

Another word commonly used to justify the wearing of the burqa or at best a veil is the word khimaar, which can be found, along with the dress code for women in 24:31. Some Muslims quote this verse as a commandment for hijab, or head cover by pointing to the word khumurihinna in 24:31, which simply means cover, forgetting that God has already used the word hijab, several times in the Qur’an. Those blessed by God can see that the use of the word “Khimaar” in this verse is not for hijab, nor for head cover. Those who quote this verse usually add (head cover or veil) after the word Khumurihinna, and usually between parentheses, because it is their addition to the verse of God. Here is the most accurate translation of 24:31.

[24:31] And tell the believing women to subdue their eyes, and maintain their chastity. They shall not reveal any parts of their bodies, except that which is apparent. They shall cover their chests with their ‘khimar’.

Most of the translators, obviously influenced by the hadith translate the word as VEIL and thus mislead people into believing that this verse is advocating the covering of the head and hair, some even go to the extent of claiming that 24:31 implies the covering of the face!

But the truth is that the word khimaar simply means a cover, any cover is called khimaar in Arabic. The derivative word khamrah, which means intoxicants, is so called because it covers the brain.

In 24:31, God is telling the women to use their cover (khimaar, being a dress, a coat, a shawl, a shirt, a blouse, a tie, a scarf . . . etc.) to cover their bosoms, not their heads, face or hair. If God willed to order the women to cover their heads, face or hair, He would have simply said, “Cover your head, face and hair.” God is neither vague nor forgetful! God does not run out of words. He does not wait for, nor need a scholar to apply the correct words for Him! God confirms that the Quran is complete and fully detailed (6:114/5).

The Arabic word for chest or more accurately the cleavage is jayb and this is the word used in this verse, but the Arabic words for head which is Ra’s, or hair which is sha’r are NOT. The commandment in the verse is clear - Cover your chest.

The last part of the verse 24:31 translates as, “They shall not strike their feet when they walk in order to shake and reveal certain details of their bodies”. Details of the body can or cannot be revealed by the dress you wear and not by your head cover.

It is a crime that so many men who have coaxed, or pressured, or demanded that their women wear the burqa, or that their daughters wear a hijab prematurely, are most probably unable or unwilling to read the Quran and uphold its tenants, being totally dependent on the interpretations incorrectly preached to them by immoderate clerics and cultural exhortations not based on pure religion. The problem with so many clerics in powerful positions within many Islamic communities around the globe, is that these religious leaders do not allow for intellectual freedom, or personal interpretation when it comes to matters of self assessed modesty and female dressing because of the narrowness in which they view women’s supposedly intemperate sexuality and the lack of self-control in men.

Surely in this day and age, human beings can be trusted to walk down the street, safe in the knowledge that a glimpse of hair will not cause a riot. A veil worn in any form should be a personal and independent choice, free of social pressure. A shroud should not be used to effectively excise a woman from the society in which they live and the possibilities of the freedoms we should all enjoy.

2:256 There shall be no compulsion in religion: the right way is now distinct from the wrong way. Anyone who denounces the devil and believes in God has grasped the strongest bond; one that never breaks. God is Hearer, Omniscient.

In Islam, a husband holds several rights over his wife, which are derived from the Quran and authentic Hadith. These rights are intended to maintain harmony, stability, and mutual respect within the marital relationship. The following are the 13 rights of a husband over his wife as commonly cited in Islamic teachings:

Wake Up Women: A Rights Of A Husband Over His Wife In America Islamic And Sharia Laws Today! - https://rumble.com/v725yfm-wake-up-women-a-rights-of-a-husband-over-his-wife-in-america-islamic-and-sh.html

We 8 Chinese's Christian women at this channel want to stress... We don't hate Muslims and I don't want you to hate Muslims. That's not the problem here.

My problem is with radical Muslims. If you're the kind of person that comes to this country, you work hard, you pay your taxes, you don't force religion down people's throats, then I don't have a problem with you.

But if you think you're going to come here to this country and force religion down the people's throats and tell people how to live their lives, you got another thing coming.

And if you're the kind of person where you're sad or you're uncomfortable living in America when it's not a Muslim country in the first place, well, I'd be more than happy to show you or tell you the directions to the airport today.

We ask Allah to keep us safe and sound, and to reform our society. May Allah bless our Prophet Muhammad.

Jizya Is A Tax Imposed On Non-Muslim Under Sharia Laws. Zohran Mamdani This Man In The Video Is Right... He Explains It Very Clearly: All American Need To Know... This Money Is Paid In Exchange For Your Life... Simply Because You Are Considered An "Enemy Of Allah" Here’s the thing: who is going to protect us from the Muslim sharia patrol? Consider the bigoted and genocidal Jew-hared central to Islamic texts and teachings today.

America Peoples also need to remember that 92% of Muslim immigration cum-ing into USA are military age men only... without bring are family with us... (no wife and no kids) to USA from third world Muslim majority countries. Remember In Islam we may have up to 4 wife's starting at age 6 yrs. Old and we are only having sex with white young teens as slave or a concubine Under Islamic & Sharia Law Only.

According to Islamic jurisprudence as presented in the provided sources, a Muslim man is permitted to have sexual relations with a female slave or concubine under specific conditions. This permission is derived from Quranic verses, such as Surah Al-Mu’minun 23:5-6 and Surah Al-Ma’aarij 70:30, which state that sexual relations are permissible with one's wives or with "those whom their right hands possess".

The term "those whom their right hands possess" refers to female slaves acquired through lawful means, such as being captured as prisoners of war during a jihad, or purchased in a legitimate transaction.

The permissibility of sexual relations with a concubine is conditional upon the woman being in a state of ownership by the man. A female slave becomes permissible for sexual relations after her master has acquired her legally, and she must not be pregnant; if she is pregnant, intercourse is prohibited until she gives birth, and if she is not pregnant, she must menstruate at least once before intercourse is allowed.

The ownership of a slave is considered to grant the master the right to sexual relations with her, and this right is seen as a lawful benefit derived from ownership, analogous to other rights such as labor or sale.

The Somali & Islamic saying "gabadh ama god hakaaga jirto ama gunti rag" loosely translates to "A Girl Should Either Be Married Or In A Grave".

Yes Most Muslim's And Far Left America And Pedophile's Love Sharia Law And It Is Better Than The American Following It Own U.S.A. Laws. It's Because The Age Of Consent To Get Married Is 6 Yrs. Old & Age To Have Sexual Intercourse With A Child Is 9 Yrs. Old Period And The Child Said About It? (You Promised Me A Happy Meal) As The Child Is Crying After Being Rape By Ten Men Daily... So This Is How It Will Work In America For Both Side Today. So All America Remember This That Islam Is A Religion Peace And Raping Gangs Is Cum-ing To A America City Near You Soon In 2026... Islam Has Officially Taken Over The People's Republic Of New York City-State Is Under Sharia Laws. ps. Remember In Islam Its not called raping a child... Its having sex with a slave or a concubine Under Islamic & Sharia Law.

Free Speech Under Siege: The Deadly Price of Criticizing Islam A Total Collapse In Its Entire 1,400 Years In World History Today.

https://stophindudvesha.org/free-speech-under-siege-the-deadly-price-of-criticizing-islam/

Throughout history, those who have criticized or questioned Islamic beliefs have often faced serious repercussions, including threats, violence, or even assassination. This ongoing suppression raises important concerns about free speech, personal safety, and the expanding influence of ideological extremism.

Yes Most Muslim's And Far Left America And Pedophile's Love Sharia Law And It Is Better Than The American Following It Own U.S.A. Laws. It's Because The Age Of Consent To Get Married Is 6 Yrs. Old & Age To Have Sexual Intercourse With A Child Is 9 Yrs. Old Period And The Child Said About It? (You Promised Me A Happy Meal) As The Child Is Crying After Being Rape By Ten Men Daily... So This Is How It Will Work In America For Both Side Today. So All America Remember This That Islam Is A Religion Peace And Raping Gangs Is Cum-ing To A America City Near You Soon In 2026... Islam Has Officially Taken Over The People's Republic Of New York City-State Is Under Sharia Laws. ps. Remember In Islam Its not called raping a child... Its having sex with a slave or a concubine Under Islamic & Sharia Law.

Praise Be To Allah, And Blessings And Peace Be Upon The Messenger Of Allah: Quran 5:38, Which States: "As for a man or woman who commits theft, cut off the hands of both to recompense them for what they earned, a deterrent from Allah. And Allah is Mighty, Wise". P.S. So To All The Muslin Peoples We Want You To Follow Your Own Laws And (Cut Off The Hand Of All The Person Who Did This Welfare Fraud & Raping Teens & Sex Slave & Rape Gangs Etc... Per Quran 5:38 Under Islamic And Sharia Laws Now).

The True Islam’s Hidden History And True Petra Theory And True Sacred City A Full Documentary - https://rumble.com/v6z9ntk-the-true-islams-hidden-history-and-true-petra-theory-and-true-sacred-city-a.html

The "Petra Theory," popularized by Canadian author and historian Dan Gibson in his documentary The Sacred City, posits that the original holy city of Islam was not Mecca in Saudi Arabia, but Petra in Jordan. Gibson argues that the first revelations of the Qur’an occurred in Petra, and that the early Muslim community, including the Prophet Muhammad, fled from there to Medina, with Mecca being established later during the Second Fitna (2nd Civil War).According to this theory, the Kaaba and the Black Stone were originally located in Petra, and the Black Stone was later moved to Mecca for safekeeping during the Umayyad campaigns.

A Central piece of evidence cited by Gibson is the orientation of early mosques. He claims that an analysis of over 200 mosques built between 622 and 922 AD shows that all 17 mosques constructed within the first 35 years of Islam (622–657 AD) faced Petra, Jordan, rather than Mecca. This pattern of orientation shifted over time, with a period of confusion from 657 to 747 AD, and by 872 AD, all mosques were built facing Mecca.

This shift is interpreted by Gibson as evidence that the religious focus moved from Petra to Mecca after the initial period of Islam. So Now Per Islamic Qur’an Teaching 1.8 Billion Muslim Are Praying 5 Times A Day Now Facing The Wrong Way Today... Why Is This Happening Today And Why Muslim's Are Not Following The True Teaching Of Muhammad Commanded That All Muslim's To Praying 5 Times A Day 1,400 Yrs. Ago Facing Petra In Jordan, Rather Than Not In Mecca Today.?

Islamic and Christian Religion are not compatible at all... its like oil and water do not mix at all today. No, it is not compatible. The Qur'an explicitly denies the divinity of Christ, which is one of the absolute bedrock tenets of the Christian faith. Without His divinity and associated sinlessness Christ's sacrifice and resurrection would carry no meaning or effect.
One additional note: I ran across this article today and I thought it would round out this answer well. In it the author explains the doctrine of the Trinity and why it matters so much. The fact that Christ was divine and one part of a triune Godhead is critical to Christianity, and as I said the Qur'an denies it outright. A great summary of the Trinity from the article:
The doctrine of the Trinity can be summarized in seven statements. (1) There is only one God. (2) The Father is God. (3) The Son is God. (4) The Holy Spirit is God. (5) The Father is not the Son. (6) The Son is the not the Holy Spirit. (7) The Holy Spirit is not the Father.
All of the creedal formulations and theological jargon and philosophical apologetics have to do with safeguarding each one of these statements and doing so without denying any of the other six.
Without a Trinity there is no Christianity, therein lies the direct conflict with the Qur'an.
Capital punishment is permitted in Islamic jurisprudence only under specific legal conditions, such as for crimes like intentional murder (qisas), apostasy, adultery (zina), or banditry (hirabah), and must be carried out by a legitimate judicial authority, not by individuals. The death penalty is not a personal right but a legal sentence within a formal justice system. Even in cases of war or jihad, classical Islamic scholars have prohibited the killing of non-combatants, including women, children, and civilians.
Some political figures have used inflammatory language, such as calling radical Shi'ite groups a "death cult," but these statements reflect personal opinions and do not represent mainstream Islamic beliefs or the views of the global Muslim community. Similarly, extremist interpretations that justify violence are widely rejected by Islamic scholars and institutions.

Dedication - https://al-islam.org/printpdf/book/export/html/121392

Truth about Agenda U.N. 21 and Plan to Control and Enslave the New World Order - https://rumble.com/v2ak54g-truth-about-agenda-u.n.-21-and-plan-to-control-and-enslave-the-new-world-or.html

Brief Outline Of The New World Order Plan UN Agenda 21 - https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/21252030%20Agenda%20for%20Sustainable%20Development%20web.pdf

U.S.A. Abandoned $85 Billions in Military Equipment in Afghanistan government and now sold all over Muslim world now to Jihad, Hamas, Khilafah, Isis, Islamic State Freedom Fighters Millions 2 Die Soon With Abandoned Weapons And Munitions Billions In Military Equipment.

Millions To Die In Middle East Now From 85 Billion Worth U.S.A. Military Equipment - https://rumble.com/v3ob59z-millions-to-die-in-middle-east-now-from-85-billion-worth-u.s.a.-military-eq.html

And Now 16 Billion Worth Of This Equipment Is Now In The Islamic State And Is Now In Muslim Hands All A Cross The 50 State In U.S.A. Today?

https://extremism.gwu.edu/sites/g/files/zaxdzs5746/files/IslamistHomophobiaintheWest090722.pdf

The Urgent Fight Against Blasphemy Laws

Abolish Blasphemy Laws Statement by Ex-Muslims International

We must abolish blasphemy laws, Now!

They are archaic, oppressive, and designed to silence, punish, and kill those who dare to think freely. These laws are not about respect for the religious; they are a weapon used by theocratic regimes and extremist mobs to crush dissent, erase minority voices, and terrorize those who challenge religious dogma. In Iran, Pakistan, and beyond, people are languishing in prison cells, awaiting execution, or being lynched in the streets—just for speaking their minds or thinking differently.

Blasphemy Laws Are a Death Sentence for Free Thought

The right to question, challenge, and criticize the taboo and sacred is the foundation of freedom of expression and conscience. Yet, in many countries, daring to express an opinion outside religious orthodoxy is met with death sentences and mob violence:

Yousef Mehrdad and Sadrollah Fazeli Zarewere executed in Iran for promoting “atheism and insulting religious and Islamic sanctities.” Also, Mohammad Amin Mahdavi Shayesteh has been sentenced to death for “insulting Islamic sanctities.”

Four people have been sentenced to death in Pakistan for social media posts deemed “offensive.” Also, a mob claimed doctor Shah Nawaz insulted Muhammad, Islam’s prophet, and demanded his arrest. Whilst in custody, police orchestrated his killing.
These are not isolated incidents but part of a brutal system that thrives on fear and suppression.

This is state-backed terrorism, using violence for ideological and political goals, masquerading as justice. The death penalty for blasphemy is applicable outside of theocracies as in the recent assassination of Salwan Momika in Sweden by most likely a “foreign power.”

Make no mistake—these laws do not “protect” the religious. Many believers are also targeted by blasphemy laws. Also, religion, like any other idea, cannot be “protected,” it must be open to criticism and dissent, even when the dissent is deemed unpalatable, such as in Quran burning. Calls for blasphemy laws in Europe, such as in Sweden and the UK only further embolden the religious-Right, including those who carried out the murder of Samuel Paty, the Charlie Hebdo attack, and the threats against the Batley Grammar School teacher, who remains in hiding to this day.

The apology by the mother of an autistic boy in Wakefield after he accidentally dropped a Quran is another example of blasphemy hysteria, thanks to years of appeasement policies towards religion and the religious-Right in contravention of fundamental human rights.

Islamic Justifications for the Death Penalty for Apostasy and Blasphemy

While the Quran does not explicitly prescribe execution for apostasy or blasphemy, classical Islamic jurisprudence and Hadith (sayings of Prophet Muhammad) have been used to justify capital punishment for those who leave or criticize Islam.

Quranic verses include:
Surah Al-Baqarah (2:217): “And whoever among you reverts from his religion and dies while he is a disbeliever – for those, their deeds have become worthless in this world and the Hereafter…”

Surah Al-Ma’idah (5:33): “Indeed, the penalty for those who wage war against Allah and His Messenger… is none but that they be killed or crucified…”

Surah An-Nisa (4:88-89): “But if they turn away, then seize them and kill them wherever you find them…”

Examples of Hadith include:
Sahih Bukhari (9:83:17): “The blood of a Muslim cannot be shed except in three cases: … the one who reverts from Islam and leaves the community.”

Sunan Abu Dawood (4:4340): “The Messenger of Allah said: ‘Whoever changes his religion, kill him.’”

Sahih Muslim (3:4131): Ali, the fourth caliph, executed a man for leaving Islam, saying the Prophet instructed it.

Sunan Abu Dawood (38:4348): “A blind man’s slave-mother used to abuse the Prophet. He killed her. The Prophet said: ‘Her blood is permissible.’”

Sahih Bukhari (5:59:369): “A man said: ‘O Allah’s Messenger! What about those who insult you?’ The Prophet replied: ‘Kill them.’”
These texts are the foundation of modern blasphemy laws in countries like Pakistan, Iran, and Saudi Arabia, where people are imprisoned or executed for questioning religion.

Religions are ideologies not sentient beings and do not warrant human rights. Human rights are for people, not religions and beliefs. The separation of religion from the state (Laicite) is a matter of life and death for those accused of blasphemy and apostasy and a minimum precondition for the respect of the rights to expression and conscience.

Jihadi Grape Are Teenage UK Or American Girl Muslim Grooming Gangs Criminality Filthy Ideology - https://rumble.com/v724328-jihadi-grape-are-teenage-uk-or-american-girl-muslim-grooming-gangs-criminal.html

UK grooming gangs are working full time with tens of thousands minor girls as young as 9 ears old were groomed, raped, beaten, and killed ? be-heading by millions Muslim predators across thousands cities all over the world as authorities turned a blind eye to everything now.

Islam is Not a Religion of Peace or The Truth About Islamophobia and Sharia Laws - https://rumble.com/v2gegm4-islam-is-not-a-religion-of-peace-or-the-truth-about-islamophobia-and-sharia.html

https://web.archive.org/web/20150703113256/http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/quran/023-violence.htm

Truth About Islam Laws In USA All Death Penalty For Violations Today. So Why Are All Or Most Muslim So Dishonest In America Today And All Muslim In U.S.A. Need To Go Home Now Today? Tens Of Millions Live On Welfare Fraud, Sex Slave, Gang Raping* Terror Groups And Lying On Immigration Forms Etc. Etc.

The Idea That Muslim Women Cannot Work At All Under Islamic Laws Is Correct. Stealing and being dishonest are closely related behaviors that both involve a breach of trust and societal norms, often stemming from similar psychological and moral motivations. Quran 5:38, which states: "As for a man or woman who commits theft, cut off the hands of both to recompense them for what they earned, a deterrent from Allah. And Allah is Mighty, Wise". Thank You !

P.S. So To All The Muslin Peoples We Want You To Follow Your Own Laws And (Cut Off The Hand Of All The Person Who Did This Welfare Fraud... Per Quran 5:38 Under Islamic And Sharia Laws Now Today).

https://al-islam.org/printpdf/book/export/html/121392

Islam’s Biggest Problem Is? What Is The Islamic Dilemma? Its Own Jesus* Either Way, Islam Is False? -https://rumble.com/v72cxf6-islams-biggest-problem-is-what-is-the-islamic-dilemma-its-own-jesus-either-.html

Real Parallel Worlds Today - NAZI vs U.S.A. - COVID-19 - ANTIFA - SS vs FBI vs DEATH -https://rumble.com/v3g2oan-real-parallel-worlds-today-nazi-vs-u.s.a.-covid-19-antifa-ss-vs-fbi-vs-deat.html

World Economic Forum Great Reset Medical Tyranny, Woke Culture, Green Agenda -https://rumble.com/v3jfm06-world-economic-forum-great-reset-medical-tyranny-woke-culture-green-agenda.html

Yes The New World Order Year Zero... Its For The Greater Good, Greater Good, Greater Good, And God Bless You ALL... Yes Its For The Greater Good In 2026.

We at this channel would like to add this quote for everyone to open your own mind this year: Your body diet is not only what you eat. It is also what you watch, what you listen to, what you read, the people you hang out with and the things you subject your mind, body and soul too. Always be mindful of the things you put into your body emotionally, spiritually and physically. Thank You Everyone Who Watch Our 1162+ Video's To Help Other In 2026.

Show less