DEBUNKING the Democrat/Collectivist obsession w/ mass murder events

Sources

[X1] https://bjs.ojp.gov/document/hvus23.pdf (Table 5, 2023 data)

[X2] https://bjs.ojp.gov/content/pub/pdf/htius.pdf (p. 120-128, especially p. 124, lots of good historical data on murder demographics, multiple victims, etc., 1976-2005, including national murder rates from 1950-2005)

[X3] https://bjs.ojp.gov/content/pub/pdf/htus8008.pdf (p. 24, Figures 36 & 37)

[X4] https://bjs.ojp.gov/redirect-legacy/content/pub/pdf/cvus08.pdf (Table 36, Murder is not
measured by the NCVS because of an inability to question the victim)

[X5] https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8351098/

[X6] https://bjs.ojp.gov/library/publications/criminal-victimization-united-states-statistical-tables#full (lots of good data on multiple victim incidents *aside from murder*) Select “Victims & Offenders” (Table 36)

[X7] https://nrcdvf.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/multiple-killings-zeoli-updated-112918.pdf

[X8] CORRECTING my previous data https://web.archive.org/web/20231001192843/https://professor_enigma.webs.com/black-lives-do-not-matter on “multiple victim” homicides as I should have tallied the # of homicides as well, instead of just the average per year. From 2008-2015, 2017-18 there were 133,162 victims of murder/non-negligent manslaughter & 10.75% (14,316) of them were “multiple victim” situations. Remember, “mass murder” is 4 or more victims. In retrospect, I did tally it that way, I just did NOT show my work. I thought I erred, but I did NOT! YAY for me! Keep in mind, that time frame I covered was a historically low murder rate period https://rumble.com/v5hs2eb-lyin-brian-tyler-cohen-joe-biden-and-that-lowest-crime-ever-b.s..html]

[X9] https://www.fbi.gov/file-repository/reports-and-publications/2024-active-shooter-report https://www.fbi.gov/file-repository/reports-and-publications/2024-active-shooter-report/view

[X10] https://www.theviolenceproject.org/mass-shooter-database/ https://archive.is/STbz7

[X11] Specific demographics on mass shooters https://ammo.com/research/mass-shootings-by-shooters-race https://davidmasters.substack.com/p/the-big-white-lie-data-reveals-race https://www.statista.com/statistics/476456/mass-shootings-in-the-us-by-shooter-s-race/ https://archive.is/Ibgj4

[X12] U.S. demographics by race/ethnicity https://web.archive.org/web/20250510074425/https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/fact/table/US https://web.archive.org/web/20250000000000*/http://www2.census.gov/prod2/statcomp/documents/1991-02.pdf https://web.archive.org/web/20120418225556/http://www.census.gov/population/www/pop-profile/files/2000/profile2000.pdf https://web.archive.org/web/20120112024922/https://www.census.gov/prod/cen2010/briefs/c2010br-02.pdf

********
Mass shootings are like plane crashes, they’re a very small portion of all deaths, but when it happens there are plenty of carnival-barkers screeching like lunatics, crying crocodile tears, pretending to care about those who are dead & they usually try to use it for political expediency before the bodies are even cold.

You’re safer in a plane than you are in a car, you’re far, far, far more likely to die in a car, but when a plane does a cartwheel on the landing strip & 100 people die, it’s big news.

In any random situation, you’re very unlikely to be the victim of a violent crime (tell that to those who live in Memphis, Wilmington (DE) or Baltimore, right?) & if you are, you’re unlikely to be murdered.

If you live in a predominantly white, uber-Republican county, your chances of being murdered is effectively ZERO. (https://rumble.com/playlists/abPz0GAS47A I will refer to this periodically) >2/3 of all U.S. counties in a given year have <2 murders & you cannot have a mass murder if you have only one victim. >1/2 of all U.S. counties in a given year have ZERO murders, so when mass murder happens, it tends to happen in a small segment of U.S. Counties. That’s an important point you must not forget.

30,198,046 people nationwide live in counties w/ ZERO murders & 51,430,450 people live in counties w/ <2 murders. That’s a big chunk of the population & most of the land area of the U.S. disqualified from the mass murder debate. Let’s focus on

Just 17% of the entire population commits 44.5% of the murders https://rumble.com/v4doe80-creepy-old-man-sam-seder-is-worried-about-guns-his-voters-are-the-problem-p.html & the likely conclusion if we extrapolate that out is 1/3 of the U.S. population probably commits ~80% of the murders.

So, mass murder, much like run-of-the-mill, single victim murder (usually w/ one assailant) is not widespread – but some talking heads in the antique media would like you to think it is – just like “we have a gun violence epidemic”, when we do not.

[X7] Now for some interesting data (and some rebuttals from yours truly) on mass shootings from The Battered Women’s Justice Project: “A note on gender: Men commit the majority of intimate partner homicides, intimate partner homicides with multiple victims, including children, intimate partner homicides followed by suicide, with or without child victims, and mass murders. The majority of intimate partners killed are female. Therefore, I refer to the homicide offender with masculine pronouns and the victim with feminine pronouns throughout this paper.”

So far, so good. Indeed, men https://rumble.com/v4r87ei-creepy-old-man-sam-seder-are-the-police-misandrist.html are the vast majority (a very disproportionate amount if you will) of violent crime & murder offenders.

In addition, most of the time when a murder is committed, the assailant & the victim have some sort of relationship w/ each other. It’s typically NOT some lunatic that plans to shoot up a store, a bar or fire indiscriminately from a balcony just to kill as many strangers as they can, although the media would like you to think otherwise.

[NOTE: Some of my previous data. https://web.archive.org/web/20231001192843/https://professor_enigma.webs.com/black-lives-do-not-matter Concerning homicides where we know the relationship of the victim to the assailant (or lack thereof, excluding “unknown”), from 2004-18, [76.83%, 74.55%, 76.88, 75.89, 77.98, 78.09, 77.79, 79.07, 77.78, 80.82, 78.82, 80.42, NO DATA, 80.59 & 80.47%] 78.284% of all homicides were committed by a family member or someone else that had a relationship w/ them (acquaintance, co-worker, neighbor, etc.).]

[NOTE: From 2004-2018, 68.882% of all homicides were committed where a firearm did the dirty deed. About a third of the time, the assailant uses a knife, crowbar, some other object or personal weapons to commit the crime. They did not need a gun. In the same time frame, 5.154% of all homicides were committed w/a rifle or shotgun. Want more data on weapons used in the commission of a violent crime? See https://rumble.com/v4qun10-but-only-half-of-murders-are-cleared-democratcrimewave.html & https://rumble.com/v3vdj4w-creep-sam-seder-is-worried-about-guns-his-voters-are-the-problem-part-i.html]

This is different from a complete stranger losing his marbles & shooting up a crowd or a mall because he’s mad that rich people have private jets & other folks only have a drug addiction & fatherless children running wild in the hood.

[X7] “[I]ntimate partner homicides often include multiple homicide victims. The non-intimate partner victims have been coworkers, friends, new partners of the targeted intimate partners, strangers, police officers and, most commonly, the children or family members of the targeted intimate partner. A study of 16 states from 2003 through 2009 found that 4,470 people were killed in 3,350 intimate partner homicide events, ranging from one to seven deaths per event. Forty-nine percent of these additional victims were children or other family members of the targeted intimate partner, 27% were new intimate partners of the targeted intimate partner, 20% were friends of the targeted intimate partner, 4% were strangers, and 1% were police officers called to the scene. Many of these additional victims died because they were present at the time of the intimate partner homicide, and some attempted to intervene or protect the victim… The vast majority of multiple victim intimate partner homicides are committed in private homes.”

No surprise there, they target people they know, not some lunatic who just decides to go to the mall & turn it into a shooting gallery. Continuing: “Estimates suggest that 6 to 20% of all intimate partner homicides involve multiple homicide victims.” If it’s the higher end, then that is almost 2X the rate of murder situations that feature multiple victims [X8].

[X7] “In North Carolina, from 2004 through 2013, 40 incidents of intimate partner homicide included two homicide victims, 10 incidents included 3 victims, and one case involved 4 homicide victims, making it a mass murder. Thirty-five percent of these non-intimate partner victims were the children of the targeted intimate partner. In fact, the killing of an intimate partner and her children (often termed familicide) is the most common type of multiple victim intimate partner homicide. It is estimated that 23 familicides are committed each year in the United States and most are committed with guns.”

Familicide is a horrible thing & it makes big news, but 23 of them in a nation of >340 million it’s a very tiny portion of all murders. The fact that a gun is the weapon is also not a shock. And again, the offender & the targets have some sort of previous relationship.

This is a particularly salient line: “Contrary to the portrayal of mass murders in the media as largely being committed in public places by strangers, familicides constitute half of mass murders in the U.S.” And: “These familicides sometimes include the killing of parents, siblings, or other close relatives and are most commonly committed with guns by middle-aged white males who are the husbands and fathers of their victims. In fact, from 2007 through 2011, 43% of mass murders involved only victims who were family members of the homicide offender, while 26% involved a combination of victim types. Children were killed in 49% of the 156 family mass murders that occurred from 2006 through 2016, making children more likely to die in family mass murders than mass murders committed in public (11% of which involved child deaths) and those committed in the context of a separate felony crime (21% of which involved child deaths).”

Pedocrats pretend to care about children, especially when a gunman opens fire & kills one, but most of the time they’re murdered in a familicide. In addition, I found children happen to get murdered more often https://rumble.com/v5jxb0b-brian-tyler-cohen-creepy-sam-seder-and-latifah-faisal-are-worried-about-the.html in areas dominated by Pedocrats, such as Chicago.

Remember, multiple victim murders are rare & mass murders even rarer, although they make for good fodder from carnival-barkers. Situations like the one where Chris Watts (a middle-aged white male) murders his 3 children & wife are very, very rare. You’ll see far more single victim, single offender murders in urban areas ruled by Democrats. Keep that in mind!

Here’s another important point: “Often in the context of an intimate partner homicide or familicide, the homicide offender will commit suicide. While homicide-suicides are relatively uncommon in general, suicides following intimate partner homicides are more common. Indeed, the most common type of homicide-suicide is an intimate partner homicide committed by the male partner against the female partner in the context of separation or threatened separation, followed by the male partner’s suicide. Roughly 5% of all homicides involve offender suicide; however, estimates suggest that 20% to 59% of all intimate partner homicides are followed by the offender’s suicide. One study of all 116 homicide-suicide events with female homicide victims in North Carolina from 1988 through 1992 found that 83% were perpetrated by a current or former intimate partner, and that these represented 27% of all intimate partner homicides in North Carolina at that time… The use of a gun to commit the intimate partner homicide also increases the likelihood of the offender committing suicide, with one researcher declaring that ‘among men who kill their female partners with a firearm, homicide-suicide is the norm.”

There’s more data that flies in the face of the norm. We see far more murder-suicides in intimate situations, not public mass murders. What does dovetail w/ murder in general is that men usually commit these acts, not women. When women do commit these intimate homicides, they tend NOT to commit suicide, the men do far more often.

And: “Over half of all intimate partner homicides are committed with guns, but the percentage of intimate partner homicide-related killings committed with guns seems to increase when there are additional victims. Estimates suggest that guns are used in almost three-quarters of intimate partner homicides with multiple victims). In fact, one study found that intimate partner homicide offenders are twice as likely to commit a multiple homicide when a gun is used than when they use other means to commit homicide. The majority of mass murders, whether familicide or not, involve the use of guns. Taylor (2018) reports that 65% of mass murders were committed exclusively with guns between 2007 and 2011, while an additional 13% of mass murderers used a combination of weapons. Using a larger time frame, from 2006 through 2016, Fridel (2018) reports that 68% of family mass murderers, 69% of felony murderers, and 73% of public mass murderers used guns to kill.”

If you reread my previous data on weapons used in the commission of murder, the ~66-68% tally for murder overall is pretty close to the % for those who commit familicide or public mass murder. I’d wager most people would think the % of mass murders committed w/ firearms is much higher, but it is not.

The rest of this relatively good article (aside from the stump for “red flag laws”, which turn due process on its head – if you have a violent former partner, get a piece of paper that tells him/her he can’t come around, but if Jacob Blake is your assailant, he doesn’t care about that piece of paper) talks about trying to identify problems prior to a nutcase going on a rampage & killing his family.

However, much of the time there is no history of domestic abuse (and if you get abused ladies, I suggest you report it), but it does seem that a lot of familicide is precipitated by divorce or separation.

Nobody could’ve predicted that Chris Watts would kill 4 family members just so he could have unrestricted sexual liaisons w/ his mistress.

Moving onto [X5] another piece on mass murder: “Multi-victim homicides are a persistent public health problem confronting the United States. Previous research shows that homicide rates in the U.S. are approximately seven times higher than those of other high-income countries, driven by firearm homicide rates that are 25 times higher; 31% of public mass shootings in the world also occur in the U.S… Multi-victim homicides are a persistent public health problem confronting the United States. Homicide is a leading cause of death in the U.S., particularly for people under age 45 years.”

Why are murder rates so much higher in the U.S.? Again, it’s Blacks that tend to disproportionately commit murder in these United States https://rumble.com/v6hl1z1-representative-jasmine-crockett-dumber-than-sam-seder.html & it’s a small portion of counties in the U.S. that have more than 2 murders a year. https://rumble.com/playlists/abPz0GAS47A It’s not widespread! The safest counties in the U.S. tend to be very White & very Republican. So, the murder issue in the U.S. is confined mostly to one demographic (Blacks) & confined to counties that typically vote Democrat.

Just 17% of the entire population commits 44.5% of the murders https://rumble.com/v4doe80-creepy-old-man-sam-seder-is-worried-about-guns-his-voters-are-the-problem-p.html & the likely conclusion if we extrapolate that out is 1/3 of the U.S. population probably commits ~80% of the murders. These retards aren’t off to a good start, painting w/ a broad brush.

[X5] “Mass homicides more often had female, child, and non-Hispanic white victims than other homicide types.” Mass murder is a very tiny portion of all murders, but the victims tend to be less common than murder en masse. A disproportionate amount of murder offenders are Black, as well as the victims.

And: “Compared with victims of other homicide types, victims of mass homicides were more often killed by strangers or someone else they did not know well, or by family members.” That dovetails w/ the point I’ve beaten like a dead horse. Mass murders are an outlier, but they make for good TV ratings.

Would you rather the murder rate be 8 per 100,000 w/ ZERO mass murders or the murder rate be 5.5 per 100,000 & “a lot of” mass murders?

As was pointed out in the previous article from the Battered Women’s Project: “More than a third were related to intimate partner violence.” People tend to kill people they know or better categorized, people they hate.

“Approximately one-third of mass homicide perpetrators had suicidal thoughts/behaviors noted in the time leading up to the incident. Multi-victim homicides were more often perpetrated with semi-automatic firearms than single homicides.”

The first sentence contains a lot of grey area. Among the entire population, I’d wager almost everyone has had a suicidal thought at one time or another. When does it become an obsession worth tracking? The second sentence is not necessarily true. Although mass murderers do prefer firearms, it’s not an insane amount above the % of murders overall committed w/ a firearm.” “More often”? How much more often? Not much. https://nrcdvf.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/multiple-killings-zeoli-updated-112918.pdf https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29294976/ https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29301467/ https://rumble.com/v4qun10-but-only-half-of-murders-are-cleared-democratcrimewave.html

I won’t ask again, I promise. Would you rather have a murder rate of 8 & no mass killings or a murder rate of 5.5 & lots of mass murder?

“When accounting for nonfatally shot victims, over 4 times as many incidents could have resulted in mass homicide.” I looked at FBI data for weapons involved in Robbery & Aggravated Assault, all those had the “potential” to be much more volatile. The vast majority of the time the perp did not use a firearm. https://rumble.com/v3vdj4w-creep-sam-seder-is-worried-about-guns-his-voters-are-the-problem-part-i.html Only 1/3 of the time does the perp use a firearm.

[X5] “Studies examining the aftermath of multi-victim homicides report increased rates of negative mental health outcomes, including Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD), major depression, alcohol dependence, and anxiety disorders among survivors, and decreased feelings of safety and increased fear among communities, even including those living far beyond affected communities.”

I would wager all the mothers in Baltimore, Chicago, Detroit, Wilmington (DE), Flint, DC, Cleveland, etc. – those mothers also have increased rates of negative mental health outcomes after they find their child was shot in the head during a drive-by shootout waiting for the school bus. Sometimes, that mother might find out her little “bundle of joy” was the member of a gang & a rival gang gave him a receipt.

This is uber-important: “Public mass shootings with large numbers of victims are the most frequently represented form of multi-victim homicide in national media portrayals, (Duwe, 2000) but mass homicides are defined differently across research, government, and media organizations. The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) defines mass homicides as having four or more homicide victims within the same incident (not including the perpetrator), typically in a single location, not defined by the type of weapon used.(Federal Bureau of Investigation, 2008) Reports from different organizations have tended to more narrowly focus on mass shootings, as a particular public concern and challenge for law enforcement responders. (Follman et al., 2020; Everytown for Gun Safety, n.d.-a; Gun Violence Archive, n.d.; Blair et al., 2014; O’Neill et al., 2016) These reports use the FBI criterion of four or more victims but have differed in whether the number of fatalities only (Follman et al., 2020; Everytown for Gun Safety, n.d.-a), or both fatally and nonfatally shot (O’Neill et al., 2016) define an incident. Another difference is whether all mass shootings (Everytown for Gun Safety, n.d.-a; Gun Violence Archive, n.d.) or only those that occur in public locations (Follman et al., 2020) are counted. Others report on “active shooter” incidents, focusing on the law enforcement response to incidents involving a shooter trying to kill people in a confined and populated area. (Blair et al., 2014; O’Neill et al., 2016) In a comparison of four major databases of mass homicide (Everytown for Gun Safety, Gun Violence Archive, FBI’s Supplemental Homicide Reports, and Mother Jones), Booty et al. (2019) found that in one data year, THE NUMBER OF INCIDENTS INCLUDED IN EACH DATABASE RANGED FROM 11 TO 346 INCIDENTS, WITH ONLY TWO INCIDENTS INCLUDED IN ALL FOUR DATABASES (Booty et al., 2019). These differences in definition for mass homicide incidents create difficulty in understanding the burden and prevention of these incidents.”

I’ve said this before, if we are going to include incidents where for example, only one person was killed, but 5 are injured, then I could do the same w/ aggravated assault & robbery, which I did. https://rumble.com/v3vdj4w-creep-sam-seder-is-worried-about-guns-his-voters-are-the-problem-part-i.html And to belabor the point again, 2/3 of the time the assailant does NOT need a firearm. Stay tuned, I will cover some of that data again from certain Democrat jurisdictions & compare it to active shooter/mass shooter databases.

Also note that these mass murder databases do NOT include familicide (because they’re fixated on firearms), akin to what Chris Watts did (and I say that, because it is well-known) to his family. He murdered 4 people & did not need a firearm to do it.

I do credit the researchers (and I suggest you read through everything they did to collate this) for going through a lot of rigmarole to compile this: “There were 728 victims of mass homicide killed in 141 incidents (range 4-58 victims, Fig. 1; median, mode n = 4); 7112 victims of multiple homicide killed in 3439 incidents; and 74,623 victims of single homicide in NVDRS between 2003 and 2017 (Tables 1 and 200.” Note that this figure is likely a bit low as not all jurisdictions were participating.

“Sixty-seven percent of mass homicides and 59% of multiple homicides occurred exclusively in private homes/apartments (Table 2). These proportions were significantly higher than single homicides. The majority of mass homicide incidents with known suspects that occurred in private residential locations were perpetrated by a current or former intimate partner or family member of the victims (69%; data not shown).”

“Twenty-one percent of mass homicides and 30% of multiple homicides occurred in a public location (Table 2). For mass homicides, the type of public location was most frequently an ‘other’ specific public location (34%), a street/highway (17%), a bar/nightclub (10%), or a commercial area (14%) (data not shown). Among multiple homicides occurring in public locations, the most frequent types were street/highway (35%), motor vehicle (24%), or other specific location (17%). Two mass homicide incidents (7%), four multiple homicide incidents (< 1%), and 135 single homicides (< 1%) occurred at schools. Eleven percent of mass homicide incidents, and 10% of multiple homicide incidents had victims killed in more than one location type (Table 2)… Across homicide types, fatal injuries were most frequently inflicted using firearms (mass homicides (74%), multiple homicides (82%), single homicides (69%)… Across categories, most homicides with known firearm types and actions (i.e., firing mechanism) were perpetrated using handguns (range: 80–92%), the majority of which were semiautomatic or automatic firearms (86% of mass, 77% of multiple, 73% of single homicides; Fig. 2). A higher percentage of mass homicides (20%) were perpetrated using long guns (i.e., rifles and shotguns) compared with both multiple (11%) and single (8%) homicides. Most of these were also semi-automatic or automatic firearms (67%).”

I have data on murder locations as well (as well as preferred weapons), the media has a fascination
https://rumble.com/v3lpnba-creepy-sam-seder-democrat-voters-and-universal-background-checks.html https://rumble.com/v3li00z-black-hawk-county-iowa-supervisor-chris-schwartz-debunked-again-waterloo.html w/ mass shootings, but single victim, single offender homicides are far more common & I have lots of data in those video on murder LOCATIONS. I did not calculate those cities in the aggregate but suffice to say there are plenty of violent jurisdictions in America where people are murdered in their own homes, not outside in some mass shooting.

This does happen, but the antique media wants a portrayal of mass shooters as lunatics (which they are) that just decide to kill people they do not know indiscriminately & that’s not usually the case. As the data informs us, most of them occur inside (not in public, as happened in Las Vegas) & the assailant has an axe to grind against friends/family (a common theme w/ familicide) or a group they were associated with.

All the data I’ve seen in the 2 essays I’ve diligently quoted indicate over a quarter of all mass murders are committed by something *other than* a firearm. The media probably doesn’t want you to know that.

[X5] Here’s an interesting factoid: “Over 21% of mass, 16% of multiple, and 8% of single homicide incidents included victims who were nonfatally shot in the incident (Table 2) (range: 1-441). Accounting for nonfatally shot victims, 523 additional incidents in this study can be thought of as “attempted mass homicides” (data not shown). One hundred thirteen were multiple homicides with 1-2+ additional nonfatally shot, 393 were single homicides with 3+ additional nonfatally shot, 9 were suicides with 4+ additional nonfatally shot, and 8 were legal intervention deaths with 4+ additional nonfatally shot.”

I’ll beat this dead horse again. We have a boatload of aggravated assaults & robberies that had the “potential” to become something far worse for a variety of reasons (e.g. someone else enters the fray & startles the perp or the intended victim decides to resist) & over 2/3 of the time, the perp does not use a firearm.

An attempted murder (aggravated assault w/ a deadly weapon) outside a bar in Cleveland might result in a victim being shot in the hand (or shot at), nonfatally. This happens a lot in single victim, single offender situations. There are scores of situations where an aggravated assault could have turned into murder.

According to one database on https://heyjackass.com/category/2024/ Chicago crime, from 2020-2024 there were 15,075 shot & merely wounded. I would wager in most of those cases it was just one guy who had a beef w/ another guy, shot him & then took off. He could’ve been attempting a multiple victim murder in some cases, but the majority of those are likely single victim situations. A very low % were an attempted mass murder.

15,075 more potential murders in a city dominated by the Party of Collectivism & Violence. That’s over EIGHT nonfatal shooting victims in Chicago, every single day!!! Chicago is the most Democrat-dominant city in a very Democrat-leaning state. Since the authors of that article want to play that game w/ more “potential victims” I felt I needed to point that out because MSDNC & CNN won’t point that out. And again, how come the vast majority of land area in the U.S. is safe, but these Democrat-dominated areas are not?

If you want more data on that front from a city run by Pedocrats & has a sky-high murder rate – I give you Philadelphia. https://www.thetrace.org/2025/09/philadelphia-shootings-neighborhood-data/ https://www.phillypolice.com/crime-data/crime-statistics/ https://web.archive.org/web/20251007084357/https://www.phillypolice.com/crime-data/crime-statistics/ One example could be given from the “Upper Kensington” neighborhood of Philly. It had 951 “shootings” from 2015-24, 230 of them were fatal. That’s means that area alone had 721 nonfatal shootings from 2015-24.

“Cobbs Creek” alone had 130 gun homicides in the time frame examined, 605 shootings total – that gives us a whopping 475 nonfatal shootings or “potential victims” that we could’ve added to the massive body count in the city of Brotherly Love.

Just last year in Philly from 1/1/24 to 10/6/24 there were 854 “shooting victims”, but it does not tell me how many of them were nonfatal. I’d wager the vast majority. So, we have hundreds upon hundreds of “potential victims” in another “diverse” American City run by the Democrat Party. Those potential victims dwarf all the injuries caused in mass shootings and/or active shooter events in this entire country.

Baltimore City PD https://www.baltimorepolice.org/news/baltimore-police-department-releases-2024-year-end-crime-report-and-key-highlights https://www.baltimorepolice.org/news/baltimore-police-department-releases-2025-mid-year-crime-report-and-key-highlights reports that from January 2023 to July 2025, there were 1,213 non-fatal shootings in the city. That works out to approximately 1.29 nonfatal shootings every single day in Charm City. Do MSLSD & CNN spend hours on all the shooting victims in Baltimore every flipping day? No, they do not & there’s a reason for that.

Milwaukee City over just the past 365 days had 419 nonfatal shootings, https://public.tableau.com/app/profile/omap/viz/shared/CZCH8PY5Q https://city.milwaukee.gov/police/Information-Services/Crime-Maps-and-Statistics which is ~1.1 per day, every single day. There’s a potential 419 more murders in a city that has been struggling w/ crime for a very long time.

https://web.archive.org/web/20250930203659/https://city.milwaukee.gov/police/Information-Services/Crime-Maps-and-Statistics https://archive.is/SMzwT In 2023 & 2024, Milwaukee City had 1,477 nonfatal shootings, which is over 2 per day, every single day. Stay classy Milwaukee.

Most of Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Minnesota, New York, Illinois, Texas, etc. are perfectly safe, except for these little dots, a very small land area where murder is a persistent problem. It has nothing to do w/ social inequities & everything to do w/ a rotten culture, a corrupt government school system & a lack of fathers.

[X9] This might make a good segue as the FBI has a lot of good data (see Figure 40, p. 49) on “active shooter” incidents, which if unsuccessful will be portrayed as “potential mass murders.” Remember that dead horse throughout this.

“From 2000–2024, there were 556 incidents, resulting in 3,921 casualties (1,432 killed, 2,489 wounded) … From 2000–2024, the average number of casualties was 7.1 per incident (2.6 killed and 4.5 wounded).” That tells us that most “active shooter” events are not “mass murders” as they average far below the 4 murders that the FBI uses as their yardstick.

Let’s look at this in context. During the same time frame the FBI tallies https://archive.is/g9RWx 412,243 murders & that means “active shooter” fatalities were a whopping 0.3% of all murders. Even if I count all “casualties” (those killed & wounded) it only goes up to 0.95% of all murders. There are also scores of single victim, single offender assaults that could be tallied as well, which would make that 0.95% figure plummet.

I am not saying there isn’t a lot of fear generated from these events & those that died do not matter, but this would be akin to looking at CDC Mortality Reports & spending a trillion dollars trying to end a type of death that amounts to 0.3% of all deaths. Focus on the most common events.

The most common event is a single victim, single offender murder in these United States & they tend to occur in very Democrat-leaning jurisdictions. They want you to think mass murder happens everywhere & you should be terrified, but you shouldn’t. I hope you live in a state w/ permitless carry or constitutional carry, so you have the ability to protect yourself outside your home.

The 2,498 people wounded in all “active shooter” events from 2000-24 are dwarfed by the people shot & wounded in Chicago alone from 2020-24! Philadelphia, from 2015-24 had 12,636 nonfatal shooting incidents. The antique media wants us focused on guns, because we need to take everyone’s guns away, but guns in the hands of evil people tends to be a problem in cities that are “diverse” & run by Democrats.

The media likes to ignore two Democrat-dominated cities (among others) that have lots of single victim, single offender violence so they can focus on “Mass shootings.”

If we look at a low murder rate time frame (see here https://rumble.com/v5hs2eb-lyin-brian-tyler-cohen-joe-biden-and-that-lowest-crime-ever-b.s..html & here https://rumble.com/v2jcakg-sam-seder-is-brick-dumb-larry-elder-played-my-blm-call.html for historical murder data) such as 2009-2019 we have 250 “active shooter” incidents (22.7/year), which is 44.96% of all “active shooter” incidents in the time frame the FBI covers. On par w/ the average of 22.24 incidents per year.

2009-19 had 9.268 “casualties” per “active shooter incident,” much higher than the 2000-24 average.

From 2009-19 there were 2,317 “casualties” (I wish I had fatalities for each individual year too, but the FBI doesn’t give me that), which is 210.6 per year. The aggregate 2000-24 average was only 156.84. Despite the overall murder rate being historically low, we saw more carnage from “active shooter” events.

2016 & 2017 had the two highest casualties tied to active shooter incidents.

I ask again, would you rather have “mass murder” be say, 15% of all murders & the overall murder rate be 5 per 100,000 or no mass murders & the overall murder rate be 7 per 100,000? Do you want more or less dead people?

I will mention again, even we count injuries from these events & I tally every aggravated assault as a potential murder, that would cause murder rates in Democrat-leaning cities to skyrocket past their already stratospheric rates.

[X3] Some more interesting data for you. From 1980-2008 we see that 64.4% of those murdered in “multiple victim” homicides are men & 61.7% of those murdered in “multiple victim” situations were White. Both are (especially the latter) a big deviation from the norm; Blacks tend to get murdered at a much higher rate than Whites & they also tend to be the assailants much more often. Blacks are the majority of perpetrators where we have multiple offenders. https://rumble.com/v6hl1z1-representative-jasmine-crockett-dumber-than-sam-seder.html “From 1980 through 2008 – 84% of white victims were killed by whites & 93% of black victims were killed by blacks (Figure 19)… Blacks were disproportionately represented as both homicide victims and offenders. The victimization rate for blacks (27.8 per 100,000) was 6 times higher than the rate for whites (4.5 per 100,000). The offending rate for blacks (34.4 per 100,000) was almost 8 times higher than the rate for whites (4.5 per 100,000) (table 1).”

“The proportion of homicide incidents involving two victims has increased slightly from 2.7% in 1980 to 3.7% in 2008 (Figures 36 & 37). Homicide incidents involving three or more victims have also increased during this same period but have remained less than 1% of all homicides each year.”

Keep in mind, the murder rate from 1980-2008 was much higher than 2009-19, but “multiple victim” homicides were <5% of the entire body count.

[X1] 2023 by comparison saw 6.6% of all murders feature “multiple victims” (compare w/ X8] & a paltry 0.4% feature 4 or more victims. Sadly, that’s just one year, but that year was much less violence than the 1980-2008 time frame en masse. What does the media focus on? Not the massive amounts of black-on-black murder in Baltimore, Chicago, Detroit, Wilmington (DE), Philadelphia or Milwaukee – but “active shooters.”

[X2] I’m going to use this info & compare it w/ the massive drop in murder in the wake of the Bill Clinton Crime Bill. https://rumble.com/v6r43mu-sam-seder-is-fake-news-crime-is-down-crime-up-because-of-covid.html

From 1976-1994, the percentage of murders that were “multiple victims” averaged 3.373% of all murders. That’s much lower than (see X8] the % from 2008-2015 & 2017-18, yet the former time frame had a much higher murder rate. Again, would you rather have a much lower murder rate & a higher % of “multiple victim” murders? Do you want more or less dead people?

From 1995-2005 (The Clinton Crime Bill got underway in 1995), 4.427% of all murders featured “multiple victims.” 1995-2005 had a much lower murder rate than 1976-1994. Again, do you want more or less dead people?

If you’ve dug through all this literature I’ve featured, multiple offender murders are much more common than multiple victim murders & the offenders in multiple offender murders tend to be 24 years of age or younger.

[X2] From 1976-1994, only 0.184% of all murder incidents featured 4 OR MORE VICTIMS. From 1995-2005, only 0.199% of all murders featured “4 or more victims.” The latter time frame had a much lower murder rate, but a higher % of them were “mass murder” situations.

From 1976-1994, 30.805% of all “multiple victim” murders were perpetrated w/ a weapon that was NOT a firearm. From 1995-2005, 23.836% of all “multiple victim” murders were perpetrated w/ a weapon that was NOT a firearm.

Again, in the latter time frame we have a much lower murder rate, but more mass murders as a % of all murders & a higher % of all “multiple victim” murders committed w/ a firearm. If I didn’t show Pedocrats the years, they’d probably think the 1995 & later time frame had a higher murder rate, but it does not. Do you want more or less dead people? Yes, I’m asking you Democrats. Quit murdering people, behave, stick around & raise your kids, get a job, stay off drugs.

[X2] “Based on data for the years 1976-2005 – Blacks are disproportionately represented as both homicide victims and offenders. The victimization rates for blacks were 6 times higher than those for whites. The offending rates for blacks were more than 7 times higher than the rates for whites. Males represent 77% of homicide victims and nearly 90% of offenders. The victimization
rates for males were 3 times higher than the rates for females. The offending rates for males
were 8 times higher than the rates for females.”

[X2] (p. 131 gang) Some interesting data on gang homicides. Democrats like to screech about stopping gun violence, but much of it is criminal on criminal & of course, they can’t have their Chinese-style authoritarian society where their political opponents are armed. How long do you think Fidel Castro would have had absolute rule if the people he was oppressing & imprisoning were armed & able to defend themselves? I digress.

From 1976-1994 (excluding “unknown”) of the 317,953 murders, 3.12% (9,928) of them were categorized as “gang related.” (From 1991-94 it was 6.97% -- 4,888 gang-related out of 70,094 murders)

From 1995-2005 (excluding “unknown”) of the 128,509 murders, 8.69% (11,178) of them were categorized as “gang-related.” The latter time frame had a much lower murder rate, but a much higher % of murders being scumbag on scumbag violence.

[X10] The Violence Prevention Project tracks mass shootings and gives us this important note: “We define a mass shooting as four or more people shot and killed, excluding the shooter, in a public location, with no connection to underlying criminal activity, such as gangs or drugs.”

That takes familicide out of the equation & ignores a lot of gangland killings. For example, FBI https://cde.ucr.cjis.gov/LATEST/webapp/#/pages/explorer/crime/shr expanded homicide data tells us that https://archive.is/uCoaG https://dgav1x38qxbr0y.archive.is/uCoaG/fe11f6c0a09ceb7b404df393ee55ac2842346e6d.jpg (excluding “All instances where the facts provided do not permit determination of circumstances”) 8.1% of all murders were committed in gangland or drug scenarios (“Juvenile Gang Killings”, “Gangland Killings” & “Brawl Due to Influence of Narcotics” – 10,574 of 130,446 murders). That ignores a hefty chunk of murders where we know the circumstances of the fatality.

If I include all the categories, even the unknown circumstances – those 3 scenarios are still 4.61% of all murders (10,574 of 228,880). If you piled up all the fatalities that were due to narcotic influence & gangland killings from just 2010-24, those dwarf all the casualties (those killed & injured (3,585), according to “The Violence Project”) from all mass shootings from 1966 to 2024.

To put this in context AGAIN, the number of nonfatal shootings in Philadelphia, Chicago, Milwaukee & Baltimore are a bigger problem than mass murder or mass shootings. According to the https://cde.ucr.cjis.gov/LATEST/webapp/#/pages/explorer/crime/query FBI in Chicago alone from 2015-24, there were 5,669 murders. https://archive.is/iTWEI (the 2021 total is likely a bit low) Just that ten-year period in one Democrat-leaning city we have more murders than all the “casualties” (counting injuries) from mass shootings since 1966. Think about that. There were 91,527 people https://archive.is/Rt1ik who were (aggravated) assaulted in Chicago 2015-2020! I am not including 2021-24 because they’re not fully reporting their crime data, that is obvious.

Do you think the people in Chicago who were assaulted are having poor mental health outcomes or does that only apply to people who are injured in mass murder events?

Mass murder is not America’s biggest problem, it’s Chicago, Memphis, New Orleans, Detroit, Milwaukee, Flint, Baltimore, Portland, St. Louis, the Twin Cities, Philly, etc. Most areas in the U.S. have little or no murder. https://rumble.com/playlists/abPz0GAS47A

[X11] I do have other data on the race/ethnicity of mass shooters, let’s see what Statista says first.

[NOTE: Remember, you have to look at ETHNICITY to separate Hispanic from non-White Hispanic. A lot of people forget to do that & they screech about “White” crime, when that includes Hispanic/Latino. Go to ethnicity, it’s as if they can’t navigate tabs on a web page]

*** [X12] Demographic data from the U.S. for several decades. Non-Hispanic White is a much larger % of the population than “Hispanic/Latino” & “Black/African-American.” ***

According to Statista, (excluding “unknown/unclear”) of the 140 mass shooters from 1982 to the present, 60% (84) of them were “White.” That’s lower than the percentage of the population that is “White Only” – just in case we have some Democrats reading this that can’t do math.

18.57% (26 of 140) of the mass shooters were “Black”, which is higher than their % of the entire U.S. population. Whoops!

Statista also has this note: “Since 2013, the source defines a mass shooting as any single attack in a public place with three or more fatalities, in line with the definition by the FBI. Before 2013, https://www.ojp.gov/ncjrs/virtual-library/abstracts/analysis-recent-mass-shootings https://nij.ojp.gov/topics/articles/advancing-mass-shooting-research-inform-practice a mass shooting was defined as any single attack in a public place with four or more fatalities.”

This goes back to a previous point I made – depending on what database you utilize, the number of mass murder events varies widely, so be careful of those moving goalposts that people may use to grind a political axe.

We know & can define what is an “Aggravated Assault” & what is a “Murder/Non-Negligent Manslaughter.” The FBI definition of “Rape” changed in 2013, don’t forget that.

Cassandra McBride (covering some of the material I have already elucidated) writes: “Black and white males, excluding gang violence, have the highest rates of mass shootings among demographic groups, with 0.09 incidents per 100,000 people. White Americans committed 53% of the 195 mass shootings between 1966 and 2024. Black Americans committed 21% of all targeted mass public shootings between 1966 and 2024. Across all racial groups, 98% of mass shooters are male, with no female mass shooters reported among Asians and Latinos… Overall, the racial distribution of mass shooters aligns closely with each group’s population size, indicating that no single demographic commits these acts at a disproportionately higher rate than others.”

She makes this salient point: “Defining Mass Shootings: There is no standard definition for mass shootings in the United States. Mass shootings, as defined in this article, are public shootings with four or more deaths, excluding the shooter, and do not include gang or family violence.”

Now a word from David Masters, who debunks the antique media pablum that most mass shooters are right-wing, white supremacists.

“A newly updated dataset from the Crime Prevention Research Center (CPRC) compiles the demographic makeup of mass public shooters in the U.S. from 1998 through December 2024 (using the narrow, traditional definition: four or more people murdered in a public place, not tied to another felony like gang/robbery)… Gender: The overwhelming majority of perpetrators are male (roughly 96–98% depending on the dataset and years compared). (Federal Bureau of Investigation, The Violence Project)”

“Race & ethnicity: A majority of identified shooters are white, but whites (and Hispanics) are underrepresented relative to their population shares, while Black, Asian, Middle Eastern/North African (MENA), and American Indian offenders are overrepresented relative to their population shares. (CPRC’s 1998–2024 update places non-MENA whites at ~55% of offenders versus ~57% of the population; Hispanics at ~10.5% of offenders vs ~19.5% of the population; MENA at ~6.7% of offenders vs ~1.06% of the population; Asians at ~7.6% of offenders vs ~6.4% of the population.)”

“CPRC argues that entertainment media and news coverage often reinforce the idea that mass public shootings are mostly the work of white supremacists—a claim the center says is not supported when looking at all mass public shootings since 1998. The broader academic and monitoring literature, meanwhile, emphasizes subgroups (e.g., extremist-motivated shootings) where right-wing actors have in some years predominated. Both statements can be true within their respective scopes, and conflating scopes fuels confusion.” https://crimeresearch.org/2025/01/updated-information-on-mass-public-shootings-from-1998-to-2024/

So far, so bad for the folks who think straight, White Men are a disproportionate amount of mass shooters. I’m miffed at the all the Democrats who just fail to look up population data or have even a cursory knowledge of statistics.

“Across cases, most shooters leave no clear political affiliation. Among those who do, incidents tied to Islamist extremism (e.g., Orlando 2016, San Bernardino 2015) and far-right or white-supremacist ideologies (e.g., El Paso 2019, Buffalo 2022) are prominent. Academic and monitoring groups analyzing ideologically motivated killings (a narrower slice than all mass public shootings) have, in some years, found right-wing extremism dominating extremist-linked deaths; however, this is not the same as saying most mass public shootings overall are ideologically motivated or right-wing. Distinguishing “mass public shooting” from “extremist-related mass killing” and from “active shooter” is crucial for honest comparisons.”

And to beat this dead horse again, single victim, single offender homicide numbers in the hood dwarf all these mass shootings, which suck up all the oxygen due to political agendas.

David makes a very important point here: “What about transgender perpetrators? This topic has produced more heat than light. The most up-to-date synthesis points to rarity in absolute numbers but overrepresentation relative to population share in the CPRC’s “mass public shooting” category: CPRC (2018–2024 slice): estimates the share of identified transgender shooters at ~6.8× their estimated share of the U.S. adult population (where population estimates vary ~0.5%–1.0% depending on source and year). The absolute count is very small, which makes ratio estimates sensitive to single cases. (Crime Prevention Research Center)”

“Independent media fact-checks covering broader “mass shooting” tallies (not the same as “mass public shootings”) stress that the overwhelming majority of mass shooters are cisgender men, with trans or nonbinary perpetrators accounting for only a handful of cases across hundreds—again, definition differences matter. (Reuters, Newsweek)”

“Notable post-2018 cases often cited in public debate include the Covenant School shooting in Nashville (2023)—a mass public shooting with six fatalities involving a trans-identified offender—and a small number of other high-profile shootings that either do not meet the 4-fatality bar or do not fit the CPRC definition but are nonetheless folded into looser “mass shooting” counts. These definitional shifts are why totals you see online can diverge so dramatically.”

The last sentence was the most important, watch out for those moving goalposts.

“What has changed since 2021? Expanded window: The CPRC dataset has been updated through December 2024, refining race/ethnicity shares and adding a transgender-status breakout for 2018–2024. (Crime Prevention Research Center)”

“Recent cases: High-salience incidents in 2022–2024—Uvalde (2022), Buffalo (2022), Colorado Springs (2022), Nashville (2023), Lewiston (2023)—shift case totals and ideologic tallies at the margins but do not overturn the core demographic pattern: overwhelmingly male, racially mixed with whites as a plurality/majority, and no declared political ideology in most cases. (Federal Bureau of Investigation)”

Be careful of those moving goalposts kids & especially be careful of stupid, lazy people who “post a study” finding that White Supremacists are the vast majority of mass shooters & White people are a cancer on society. This essay debunks that thoroughly.

The EXACT same thing was done years ago when a “study” was published that told us, “America has a Red State Murder Problem.” Brian Tyler Cohen repeated this lie by omission, as did David Pakman & a number of other losers who have never had a real job. A lie by omission, America has a Blue County & Blue City Murder Problem & within that, a debilitating Black-on-Black Murder Problem. https://rumble.com/playlists/a4bmS3taTSY

The Devil is in the details my friends. Mr. Chairman, I Yield Back!

*** ADDENDUM ***

[X6, Table 36] Let’s look at multiple victim situations related to violent crime that is NOT murder. Between 1996-2008, 9.42% of “aggravated assaults” (1,379,702 of 14,645,990) featured two or more victims. Should the media obsess over those aggravated assaults as another potential murder as they do w/ those injured in mass murder events?

As for “completed violence” during the same time frame, there were 23,767,580 incidents & 6.37% (1,515,181) of those incidents featured two or more victims.