Preservation Program, my ass. It is Farm "Fraud & Swindle"!

3 days ago
56

Delivered Writ of Habeas Corpus to the Supreme Court of the United States.
"The “Racketeering-Conspiracy” to steal by “Fraud and Swindle” the Farmer’s non-agricultural development rights and credits using “Land Preservation” non-profits, State Agencies, State Programs and State Agricultural Committees is grotesque injustice that irreparably harms all the State of New Jersey and America."

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
AUGUST 18th, 2025
Writ of Habeas Corpus

[Sui Juris Petitioner, Shya Beth, living American]
vs.
[Judge Jamel K. Semper (in his individual capacity); Judge Frank J. DeAngelis (in his individual capacity); Judge James M. DeMarzo (in his individual capacity); THE COUNTY OF SUSSEX and SUSSEX COUNTY AGRICULTURE DEVELOPMENT BOARD; SUSSEX COUNTY AGRICULTURE DEVELOPMENT BOARD Chairman, Peter Southway (in his individual capacity); SUSSEX COUNTY AGRICULTURE DEVELOPMENT BOARD Vice Chairman, Brian Hautau (in his individual capacity); Joseph D. Greer, Esq. (433302023) of Lavery Selvaggi & Cohen, a Professional Corporation; James F. Moscagiuri, Esq. (029222001) of Lavery Selvaggi & Cohen, a Professional Corporation; Dennis R. McConnell, Attorney at Law; Senior Planning Aide of the Sussex Country Division of Planning and Farmland Preservation Program, Rudy Dragan; and the other Complicit Participants]

Petitioner, Sui Juris, living American
Shya Beth
120 Warbasse Junction, Lafayette
Sussex County, New Jersey

Writ of Habeas Corpus served by Sui Juris Petitioner, Shya Beth, living American, 120 Warbasse Junction, Lafayette, Sussex County, New Jersey, pursuant to TITLE 28 US CODE 2254 as all legal remedies are exhausted because Complicit State of New Jersey Judges engage in “SEDITIOUS CONSPIRACY” (Title 18 US Code 2384) as an “ENEMY” (Title 50 U.S. Code 2204) executing “DOMESTIC TERRORISM” (Title 18 U.S. Code 2331) and TREASON (Title 18 U.S. Code 2381) against the Petitioner, the Farmers of New Jersey, and “the People” of America by weaponizing judicial authority which requires strict adjudication in an Article III Court with Trial by Jury.

COMPLAINTS

The Deed of Easement, State of New Jersey Agriculture Retention and Development Program was made February 4, 2008, between Annette M. Fritz (Grantor) and Morris Land Conservancy, a non-profit of the State of New Jersey (Grantee) that in the future

“Any development of the Premises for nonagricultural purposes is expressly prohibited.”

However, the “Misrepresented” boilerplate Deed of Easement later states the following:

“Grantor, Grantor’s heirs, executors, administrators, personal or legal representatives, successors, and assigns further transfers and conveys to Grantee all of the nonagricultural development rights and development credits appurtenant to the lands and Premises described herein. Nothing herein shall preclude the conveyance or retention of said rights by the Grantee as may be permitted by the laws of the State of New Jersey in the future. If the Grantee sells or donates the development rights, it shall pay to the Committee 30 percent of the net proceeds. Net proceeds means the amount of compensation received by Grantee in excess of any unreimbursed costs.”

It is obvious that the goal of the complicit participants is to acquire all the nonagricultural development rights and credits of New Jersey farmland for future profit as described in the clause above.

This contradicts the “NO DEVELOPMENT” purpose of the Deed of Easement.

Are State of New Jersey farmers aware of this subtle but significant deception?

Please Note: The State of New Jersey can execute “eminent domain” if land is required for the public good.

This is a bill of complaint of “Deceptive Business Practices”, “Fraud & Swindle”, and “Racketeering-Conspiracy” involving many complicit participants.

AFFIDAVIT: STATEMENT OF TRUTH
Shya Beth
What I have presented within this Counterclaim and Bill of Complaint shows the truth hidden in plain sight of the New Jersey Farmland Preservation Program’s true intent and purpose.

All the evidence of negligent misrepresentation, and outright deception of supposedly “preserving New Jersey Farmland” within this document is found within the pages of the fraudulent Declaration of Covenants, Assignment of Easement, and the Deed of Easement itself. The scheme of taking control of farmland development rights, hiding their ability and plan (down to the percentage of the profits) to resell the development rights when the time suits them flies in the face of all of what the New Jersey Farmland Preservation Program publicly stands for: Preserving New Jersey farmland, and supporting the next generation of farmers.

As a third-generation farmer on this land, horsewoman, and artist, it is appalling and frankly shocking to see how I, my family, and the rest of the landowners within the Farmland Preservation Program, have been betrayed by the parties named in this Counterclaim and Bill of Complaints. Sold the promise that this land would never be developed and farms like mine would be supported, I have in turn been forced to fight
for my property and against these adversaries at every turn, causing unsurmountable wasted time, effort and resources that I could have instead invested into my farm and business, not to mention the stress and lost opportunities caused by this lawsuit.

A lawsuit brought forward by a party that has no claim or harm done to them by me, but have undeniably caused harm against me, the landowners within the program, and “the People” of New Jersey.

The “Deceptive Business Practices”, “Fraud & Swindle”, and “Racketeering-Conspiracy” executed and disguised as a noble cause of saving our farmland and open space is Diabolical.

Complicit State of New Jersey Judges and the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey, Judge Jamel K. Semper (in his individual capacity) are engaged in “SEDITIOUS CONSPIRACY” (Title 18 US Code 2384) as an “ENEMY” (Title 50 U.S. Code 2204) execute and enable “DOMESTIC TERRORISM” (Title 18 U.S. Code 2331) and TREASON (Title 18 U.S. Code 2381) against the Petitioner, the Farmers of New Jersey, and “the People” of America by weaponizing judicial authority which requires strict adjudication in an Article III Court with Trial by Jury.

Loading comments...