US District Court Chief Judge Colm Felix Connolly is a Traitor.

Chief Judge of the United States District Court for the District of Delaware Colm Felix Connolly is a traitor. [ new CASE 1:25-cv-01079-UNA]

His August 22, 2025, C.A. No. 25-149-CFC Order to Dismiss confirms this.

Legal Maxim: "He who does not deny, admits".

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
August 27, 2025
Writ of Habeas Corpus
[Sui Juris PETITIONER, Andrew Hamilton Pritchard]
vs.
[Chief Judge of the United States District Court for the District of Delaware Colm Felix Connolly, United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit Judge Tamika R. Montgomery-Reeves. United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit Judge Patty Shwartz, United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit Judge Anthony J. Scirica, United States District Court of Delaware Judge Jennifer L. Hall, United States District Court of Delaware Judge Maryellen Noreika, United States District Court of Delaware Judge Gregory B. Williams, United States District Court of Delaware Clerk of Court Randall C. Lohan; Delaware Supreme Court Justice Abigail M. LeGrow, Justice Karen L. Valihura, Justice Gary F. Traynor, Justice N. Christopher Griffiths, Superior Court Judge Eric M. Davis, Judge Danielle J. Brennan, Delaware Governor John Carney and other Complicit Participants]

Writ of Habeas Corpus by Sui Juris Petitioner, Andrew Hamilton Pritchard, Beneficiary in Equity/Executor of 9 Sylvester Court, Norwalk, Connecticut pursuant to Title 28 U.S. Code 2254 as all of the State of Delaware legal remedies are exhausted; and the First Amendment to the US Constitution that states the following: "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."

Judge Colm Felix Connolly is a traitor.

His August 22, 2025, C.A. No. 25-149-CFC Order to Dismiss confirms this.

Judge Colm Felix Connolly does not comply with his oath to the Constitution of the United States wars against that Constitution and engages in acts in violation of the supreme law of the land. The Judge Colm Felix Connolly is engaged in acts of treason. The U.S. Supreme Court has stated that "no state legislator or executive or judicial officer can war against the Constitution without violating his undertaking to support it"

Cooper v. Aaron, 358 U.S. 1, 78 S. Ct. 1401 (1958)
Note: Any judge who does not comply with his oath to the Constitution of the United States wars against that Constitution and engages in acts in violation of the supreme law of the land. The judge is engaged in acts of treason. The U.S. Supreme Court has stated that "no state legislator or executive or judicial officer can war against the Constitution without violating his undertaking to support it". See also In Re Sawyer, 124 U.S. 200 (188); U.S. v. Will, 449 U.S. 200, 216, 101 S. Ct. 471, 66 L. Ed. 2d 392, 406 (1980); Cohens v. Virginia, 19 U.S. (6 Wheat) 264, 404, 5 L. Ed 257 (1821).

Scheuer v. Rhodes, 416 U.S. 232, 94 S. Ct. 1683, 1687 (1974)
Note: By law, a judge is a state officer. The judge then acts not as a judge, but as a private individual (in his person). When a judge acts as a trespasser of the law, when a judge does not follow the law, the Judge loses subject-matter jurisdiction and the judges' orders are not voidable, but VOID, and of no legal force or effect.

The judges and complicit participants named above are traitors.

They are the “ENEMY” (TITLE 50 US CODE 2204) of the US Constitution, the Supreme Law of the Land, as defined by the Judiciary Act of 1789; and willfully execute “DOMESTIC TERRORISM” (TITLE 18 US CODE 2331) to Joseph B. Elad, the Sui Juris Plaintiff, Andrew Hamilton Pritchard, the Sui Juris Petitioner and “We the People” of America by weaponizing judicial authority from top to bottom for any objective and/or target.

Misprision of Treason by judges to hide the Treason of judges is brazen.

Legal Maxim: “The main objective of government is the protection and preservation of personal property, private rights, public liberties and upholding the law of God.”
Legal Maxim: “A claim not contested, stands true.”
Legal Maxim: “He who does not deny, admits.”
Legal Maxim: “Failure to enforce the law does not change it.”
Legal Maxim: “A claim bought in law that is not contested or rebutted, then stands true. Hence silence to a controversy is considered consent to any judgment.”
Legal Maxim: “An Unrebutted Affidavit is Truth.”
Legal Maxim: “No one is judge in their own case.”
Legal Maxim: “Judicial notice is a form of evidence.”

The United States Constitution requires Due Care in recognizing Legal Maxims.
“Inalienable Rights” and Authority:
The U.S. Constitution recognized that certain universal rights cannot be taken away by legislation, as they are beyond the control of a government, being naturally given to every individual at birth, and that these rights are retained throughout life.

The Writ of Habeas Corpus (“The Great Writ”) is my right and must be heard.

Restraint of liberty is unacceptable.

Affidavit, statement of truth:

Alexander Hamilton said, “I think the first duty of society is justice.”
Law and Justice are the lynchpin for a prosperous and balanced society.
Colm Felix Connolly is a traitor.
He is a Kangaroo Judge executing a cover-up for his mob and himself.
Kangaroo Traitor Connolly’s August 22, 2025, C.A. No. 25-149-CFC Order to Dismiss the Writ of Habeas Corpus filed February 27, 2025, confirms that he is a traitor, an “ENEMY”.
Connolly’s Order is Roo “poo”!
Traitor Connolly took an unlawful amount of time to execute this Order knowing that it is a Habeas Corpus and must have a hearing within three days, Title 28 U.S. Code 2243.
Traitor Connolly willfully omits the uncontested/unrebutted Writ of Capias-Demand for Arrest of Chief Judge of the United States District Court for the District of Delaware Colm Felix Connolly filed March 6, 2025, in C.A. No. 25-149-CFC.
Legal Maxim: "An unrebutted affidavit becomes the judgment in law."
If the government or any party fails to respond to an affidavit; then, the Affidavit is considered the binding truth between the parties involved.
See Sampson v. Channell, 110 F.2d 754, 762 (1st Cir. 1940): This case reiterates that an affidavit stands as truth unless specifically rebutted. The government, like any other party, is bound to respond to an affidavit in a timely and substantive manner. Ignoring it does not extinguish its validity; instead, it acknowledges the claims as true.

Summary:
Traitor Connolly knows the uncontested Writ of Capias-Demand for Arrest stands true.
Our courts are to protect us from harm and deliver remedy.
Instead, the weaponized “ENEMY” courts deliver attack after attack against us, “We the People”.
This mutiny empowers the limitless plunder of America in total.
The crimes against humanity are staggering.
The horrors of Guardianship, Family Court, Probate, Bankruptcy, Foreclosure, Criminal and more are jarring and grotesque.
“We the People” stand in the jurisdiction of the U.S. Constitution, the Supreme Law of the Land, not in some corporate fiction jurisdiction such as Supreme Court, United States, D-U-N-S number: 161906136.
Please Note: Agents for The Bar Associations, et al, acting as Supreme Court Justices, have admitted, in official record, that agents for political parties ,acting as state and federal officials ,in concert with agents for the BAR Associations, have violated the anti-trust and anti-monopoly laws and have monopolized the craft and practice of law, and the criminal and civil courts, have unlawfully converted the judicial branch of government into their monopolized property, and have insulated the citizen from the courts and law enforcement, thereby making private prosecution and citizens' requests for indictments from the grand juries, necessary to restore the lawful function of government, in that; “A State has an ultimate monopoly of all judicial process and attendant enforcement machinery.” Boddie v. Connecticut, 401 US 371 - Supreme Court 1971
The Writ of Habeas Corpus (“The Great Writ”) is my right and must be heard.
The judges have willfully violated their Oath and Duty.
Restraint of liberty is unacceptable.
King James Version (KJV) Galatians 6:7, “Be not deceived; God is not mocked: for whatsoever a man soweth, that shall he also reap.”
Thank you for your time and consideration in this matter.

Respectfully,

Petitioner, Sui Juris, living-breathing American
Andrew Hamilton Pritchard
Beneficiary in Equity-Executor
9 Sylvester Court
Norwalk, Connecticut
Phone: (203) 858-7949
Email: apritchard1963@gmail.com