Corruption Critic John Flynn Kidnapped by Domestic Terrorists!

[EDITED SHORT VERSION FOR RUMBLE VIDEO]
DOCKET NO. F02B-CR22-0249155-T; : SUPERIOR COURT
: J.D. BRIDGEPORT
STATE OF CONNECTICUT : AT BRIDGEPORT
V.
FLYNN, JOHN : MARCH 7, 2023

WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS COMMON LAW RIGHT/REMEDY AND DEMAND FOR TRIAL BY JURY.

John Flynn has been arrested and bonded without warrant. John Flynn has suffered financial harm and emotional distress. This criminal act is a violation of CGS Sec. 53a-157b. (Formerly Sec. 53a-157). False statement: Class A misdemeanor; CGS Sec. 53a-180. Falsely reporting an incident in the first degree: Class D or C felony; CGS Sec. 53a-180b. Falsely reporting an incident concerning serious physical injury or death: Class D or C felony; CGS Sec. 53a-183. Harassment in the second degree: Class C misdemeanor. USC 18 §2382 - Misprision of treason, USC 18 §241; CONSPIRACY AGAINST RIGHTS, USC 18 §242; DEPRIVATION OF RIGHTS UNDER COLOR OF LAW, USC 42 §1986 - ACTION FOR NEGLECT TO PREVENT, 42 U.S. Code § 12203 - Prohibition against retaliation and coercion, and Title 5 Administrative Procedure Act 1946.

I heard first that there was no warrant in John Flynn’s case file by the State Attorney prior to appearing in court. John Flynn has requested the warrant for his arrest. No warrant has been produced.

The charge of Threatening in the First Degree must be dismissed immediately with prejudice.

Requirements of a Warrant:
A warrant must be issued and be signed (no rubber stamp) by a judge who has jurisdiction; must state the facts showing jurisdiction; must be based upon probable cause; must name the offense committed; must contain an affidavit (under oath) by the accuser, stating FIRST HAND facts constituting a crime; must name the party to be arrested, or describe him sufficiently to identify him; must offer the warrant and the affidavit for inspection upon request; No handcuffs; must take me immediately before a magistrate, and hold me for no other purpose (no photographs, no fingerprinting); You are responsible for everything that happens to me even if you relinquish custody to an assign; Unlawful arrest is assault, battery & trespass; There is no immunity in a false arrest case; Good faith is not a defense to sustain false arrest.
Lastly . . . If the warrant states as cause to issue, a mere civil/statutory infraction not rising to the level of a capital crime . . . the officer must produce title to your biological property/body, before said officer can make the arrest and take possession of the biological property. You do not by accommodation, accept the offer of arrest for any statutory infraction unless the statute defines a capital crime and probable cause exists.

Summary:

There is no warrant for John Flynn’s arrest.

This fraudulent charge is to silence a critical voice speaking the truth of the rampant corruption within the State of Connecticut.

COURT IS GUILTY OF CONTEMPT OF COURT BY REFUSAL OF HABEAS CORPUS BY ANDREW HAMILTON PRITCHARD, see below

Sec. 52-467. Punishment for refusal to obey writ or accept copy. If any person having the custody of the body of anyone directed to be presented to the court or to a judge by a writ of habeas corpus duly served fails to present the body according to the command in the writ, or refuses to accept the copy of the writ offered in service, or in any way fraudulently avoids presenting the body according to the command, or, having presented the body, does not make return of the cause of detaining the person in custody, he shall be guilty of a contempt of court and may be punished for contempt by the court or judge by commitment, and shall pay to the person so held in custody two hundred dollars.

RELEVENT CASE LAW:
Davis v. Wechsler, 263 US 22, at 24
"The assertion of federal rights, when plainly and reasonably made, is not to be defeated under the name of local practice."

Scheuer v. Rhodes, 416 U.S. 232, 94 S. Ct. 1683, 1687 (1974)
Note: By law, a judge is a state officer. The judge then acts not as a judge, but as a private individual (in his person). When a judge acts as a trespasser of the law, when a judge does not follow the law, the Judge loses subject-matter jurisdiction and the judges' orders are not voidable, but VOID, and of no legal force or effect. The U.S. Supreme Court stated that "when a state officer acts under a state law in a manner violative of the Federal Constitution, he comes into conflict with the superior authority of that Constitution, and he is in that case stripped of his official or representative character and is subjected in his person to the consequences of his individual conduct. The State has no power to impart to him any immunity from responsibility to the supreme authority of the United States."

Cooper v. Aaron, 358 U.S. 1, 78 S. Ct. 1401 (1958)
Note: Any judge who does not comply with his oath to the Constitution of the United States wars against that Constitution and engages in acts in violation of the supreme law of the land. The judge is engaged in acts of treason. The U.S. Supreme Court has stated that "no state legislator or executive or judicial officer can war against the Constitution without violating his undertaking to support it". See also In Re Sawyer, 124 U.S. 200 (188); U.S. v. Will, 449 U.S. 200, 216, 101 S. Ct. 471, 66 L. Ed. 2d 392, 406 (1980); Cohens v. Virginia, 19 U.S. (6 Wheat) 264, 404, 5 L. Ed 257 (1821).

Levine v. United States, 362 U.S. 610, 80 S.Ct. 1038 (1960), citing Offutt v. United States, 348 U.S. 11, 14, 75 S.Ct. 11, 13 (1954).
The Supreme Court has ruled and has reaffirmed the principle that "justice must satisfy the appearance of justice".