The Court That Just Ruled SBRs Are NOT Arms

Wait, what? SBRs are not bearable arms? Well according to the 7th Circuit, that is correct. Washington Gun Law President, William Kirk, discusses the case of United States v. Rush, where a 3 judge panel of the 7th Circuit has ruled that SBRs are not bearable and protected arms under the Second Amendment. While this case may have shocked many, it is not really that surpising if you consider court precedent and the 7th Circuit as a whole. So learn more today and arm yourself with education.

Read the Ruling here. https://media.ca7.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/OpinionsWeb/processWebInputExternal.pl?Submit=Display&Path=Y2025/D03-10/C:23-3256:J:Kolar:aut:T:fnOp:N:3343444:S:0
_____________________________________________________________________
Have a Video Idea, then Help WGL Out. https://forms.gle/GNCyRw1HRqvAmwik6

Subscribe to our Newsletter to stay up to date on all issues that affect your rights by going to https://www.washingtongunlaw.com/newsletter _________________________________________________________________________
Contact Washington Gun Law If you have any questions about this topic, or anything else related to what's left of our Second Amendment Rights, remember you can always contact us at: www.washingtongunlaw.com or call us directly at 425-765-0487. Stay safe. ________________________________________________________________________
Subscribe to us on Rumble. https://rumble.com/c/WashingtonGunLaw

Subscribe to us on Patreon. www.patreon.com/WashingtonGunLaw

Remember, you can follow us at www.washingtongunlaw.com

Like us on Facebook at www.facebook.com/WashingtonGunLaw

Follow us on X (Twitter) @GunWashington