A Narrative Review of the COVID-19 Infodemic and Censorship in Healthcare LIESTER, MITCHELL; Sohaib Ashraf; Patricia Callisperis; Hector Carvallo; Shankara Chetty; Robert Enzenauer; Carlos Franco-Paredes; Raul Pineda; Panagis Polykretis; Rachel Wilkenson; and Peter McCullough. 2025. "A Narrative Review of the COVID-19 Infodemic and Censorship in Healthcare." Secrecy and Society 3(2). DOI: https://doi.org/10.55917/ 2377-6188.1087 https://scholarworks.sjsu.edu/secrecyandsociety/vol3/iss2/3/ Ideological and financial motivations have undermined science for decades. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e_ZDQKq2F08 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MJBaBJawnSY Organizations and governments used misinformation, disinformation, censorship, and secrecy to manage the COVID-19 pandemic. Information can be distorted and shaped by corporations and governments for financial gain or ideological purposes. Various rationales for employing censorship and secrecy during the COVID-19 pandemic are examined including, how organizations and governments create confusion about the risks associated with their products, and blame avoidance to shift responsibility and to avoid accountability for their actions. Methods of censorship employed during the COVID-19 pandemic are reviewed Data sources Scientific papers, government documents, mass media articles, books, and personal accounts of physicians and scientists. Use of censorship and secrecy created a challenge for scientists, physicians, politicians, and the general public in trying to understand COVID- related topics. Defeating the Merchants of Doubt Oreskes, Naomi, and Erik M. Conway. 2010. Nature 465 (7299): 686-87. https://www.nature.com/articles/465686a Tactics of doubt Corporations engage in deliberate strategies to create doubt about scientific findings. (the tobacco industry, cast doubt on the health risks of smoking) despite overwhelming evidence of the dangers of smoking. Use of so-called “experts” Corporations hire or fund scientists to challenge or undermine scientific findings. Support the corporate narrative Media manipulation By introducing fringe or discredited perspectives, corporations ensure that media coverage gives disproportionate weight to their desired narrative 'In the End, we will remember not the words of our enemies, but the silence of our friends.' https://www.socratic-method.com/quote-meanings/martin-luther-king-jr-in-the-end-we-will-remember-not-the-words-of-our-enemies-but-the-silence-of-our-friends#google_vignette By creating doubt and confusion, corporations manipulate public perception for their own financial gain. William R. Freudenburg Risk and Recreancy https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-1-349-62201-6_5 Privileged Access, Privileged Accounts https://www.researchgate.net/publication/236805506_Privileged_Access_Privileged_Accounts_Toward_a_Socially_Structured_Theory_of_Resources_and_Discourses Weapons of Mass Distraction https://www.elgaronline.com/display/book/9781803921044/ch27.xml Blame avoidance Shifting of responsibility / accountability for actions that result in adverse social consequences. Disproportionate attribution of blame When corporations manipulate public narratives to redirect blame toward others Normalization of deviance Over time, risky practices become normalized, reducing the likelihood that problems will be recognized as serious threats Privileged access to information By controlling access to critical information, corporations and governments make it difficult for the public or regulatory bodies to fully understand the risks or consequences of their actions or products. By controlling the flow of information, corporations diffuse or delay blame Misdirection Divert public attention away from their actions, they focus attention on smaller, less critical issues, or shift the narrative away from their culpability to natural causes Regulatory capture Is another way corporations avoid accountability

MASS BANKRUPTCIES Signal 2008 Is HAPPENING NOW, Tiffany Cianci Says COLLAPSE Is Coming BUY 28th Amendment Skateboard - https://shop.boonieshq.com/products/28th-amendment SUPPORT THE SHOW BUY CAST BREW COFFEE NOW - https://castbrew.com/ Sign Up For Exclusive Episodes At https://timcast.com/ Merch - https://timcast.creator-spring.com Hosts: Tim @Timcast (everywhere) Phil @PhilThatRemains (X) Raymond @raymondgstanley (X) Serge @SergeDotCom (everywhere) Guest: Tiffany Cianci @TheVinoMom (X)

//The Wire//2300Z December 11, 2024// //PRIORITY// //BLUF: CONCERNS GROW REGARDING NEW JERSEY AIRCRAFT SIGHTINGS. MAJOR CHINESE ACTIVITY REPORTED IN THE TAIWAN STRAIT. SYRIAN REBELS NOW CONTROL SIGNIFICANT STOCKPILES OF MANPADS.// -----BEGIN TEARLINE----- -International Events- Syria: Concerns are growing regarding the staggering amount of military arms that are now in the hands of HTS rebels throughout the country. Though Israel, Turkey, and the United States have bombed most military arms caches throughout the country, the al-Qaeda-linked “rebels” now control hundreds (if not thousands) of Man Portable Air Defense Systems (MANPADs), tens of thousands of rockets, the entire Syrian Air Force, and the like. Far East: Concerns are also mounting regarding China’s recent activities in the Taiwan Strait. Currently, China has declared extremely large scale naval exercises throughout the region, which have drawn concerns that this may actually be the prelude to a military invasion of Taiwan. As of this morning over 90 surface vessels have taken part in maneuvers in the waters surrounding Taiwan, with hundreds of aircraft also participating in exercises to some degree. AC: So far, the Chinese doctrine of camouflaging drills with legitimate invasion plans is working, and thus it’s too soon to tell if China will indeed invade Taiwan. Considering the events in the Middle East, and the outgoing American administration, it is possible that China means to strike while the iron is hot. However, as previously noted following the rapid-pace of deteriorating events around the world, it would also be in China’s best interest to flex their power in the region, without actually committing to a full-blown war. Also, the typical list of indications that would lead up to invasion plans hasn’t materialized in many ways that one might expect if China were planning to militarily invade Taiwan. -HomeFront- New Jersey: Speculation surrounding the recent drone sightings throughout the state has increased following more people becoming aware of the situation. So far, not much information has been made public regarding what is going on. However, due to the attention being placed on these events, various official statements have been made. Governor Phil Murphy has acknowledged the drones (and the dozens of sightings), but hasn’t commented on the aircraft much, except to say that the drones are not a threat to public safety. Yesterday, locals reported that one of the aircraft crashed in Montville, though almost zero details have come to light to confirm this incident, and all reporting on this alleged crash is single-source at the moment and therefore could be a false report. Companies and military contractors have weighed in on the aircraft as well. Picatinny Arsenal, a major military contractor for R&D of various technologies has stated that the devices aren’t related to their research, but they have confirmed sighting 11 drones themselves since November. This afternoon, various politicians have stated that the drones being observed in New Jersey are suspected to be of Iranian origin, and that they are being launched from a “mothership” that is operating off the coast. More specifically, most of the information being repeated by authorities indicates that no one knows who is operating the craft, or where they come from, but many have been observed arriving and departing from the coast. Additionally, the craft allegedly do not have any signals being transmitted to them, and the lighting onboard the aircraft turns off when the aircraft is approached. -----END TEARLINE----- Analyst Comments: The unidentified “drone” situation in New Jersey has become more concerning as more sightings have occurred. However, these reports are probably related to more people actually being on the lookout now that the story has gone viral. As such, an increase in reports does not always equate to an increase in actual incidents. Addressing the most concerning detail first (the allegations of Iranian origin), so far nothing that is currently available to the public can be used to verify this at all. In short, the allegation of Iran stationing a drone “mothership” off the New Jersey coastline is very unlikely. However, since we know very little about these aircraft, it would be unwise to discount any theory, even if it’s extraordinarily unlikely. Despite the online hysteria, all indications suggest these drones are related to official US government activities. For instance, many eyewitness accounts suggest that these alleged “drones” are identical to a comparatively new type of aircraft, the Pitoval Aero. This is a new type of aircraft that is essentially a very large, manned quadcopter. Pivotal obtained a large Air Force contract to conduct military testing on this platform a few months ago. Based on this information (and eyewitness accounts matching the descriptions of eVTOL aircraft), it’s quite likely that these “drone” sightings are actually manned, single-pilot aircraft that are currently being tested by the US government. This could explain how no signals are being emitted by the craft; if it’s manned by a pilot, there would be no need for radio control. Likewise, the lights can be turned off by the pilot with the flick of a switch. This would also explain all of the rather coy explanations by authorities, and the actions of those who are obviously not read-on to the program. The Governor likely knows what these platforms are, along with the various defense contractors that have made rather vague statements about these platforms. Local police and other low-level politicians, not having the need-to-know regarding a classified military program, are rightfully behaving as one would expect not knowing if these devices are a threat or not. In any case, for those concerned with these aircraft potentially being the result of some sort of hostile action reminiscent of the previous Chinese Spy Balloon incidents, one detail alone can alleviate some fears. All of the “drones” are lighted in compliance with FAA regulations. Though complacency is obviously to be avoided, usually the goal of a super-secret, intelligence collection platform is to remain covert. Likewise, the “alien” theory can be easily dismissed for a variety of reasons, but more logically by the fact that E.T. is unlikely to be familiar with FAA Advisory Circular 20-30B pertaining to Aircraft Position Light and Anticollision Light Installations. Similarly, this small detail is one of the main pieces of evidence pointing to how unlikely Iranian involvement is…Iranian drones aren’t FAA compliant. On the other hand, there’s always the other side of the coin to consider…a really smart adversary might just use FAA compliant lighting as a deception tactic to encourage authorities to let their guard down. Another point of consideration is the variance of the platforms themselves. Some aircraft are very obviously Pivotal Aero’s or some variance of such. However, other platforms remain unidentified. This could be the result of a few different possibilities. Firstly is obfuscation. If a clandestine government agency wanted to test a new platform in an area, knowing full well that they would be spotted and observed, one might also test a few new platforms at the same time to muddy the water. With multiple new types of platform, it would be easier to get witnesses to contradict each other, and it would divide the attention of observers between multiple platforms. Also, multiple types of airframes being observed can make it easier for authorities to gaslight people by lumping them all in one basket. Now, any government agency can come out and say, “yeah it was just us testing some new Pivotal aircraft, so no big deal”. That statement would seem to explain the aircraft sightings…but in reality, this statement is very manipulative because it negates all of the other aircraft that have been spotted, which are obviously not Pitoval aircraft. During a press conference, by the time a journalist realizes they didn’t actually answer the question, the conference has already moved on. To that end, the drones that are very obviously not Pivotal Aero platforms remain unidentified. It is these platforms that remain the most concerning. However, even this detail is hard to verify as many people have been reporting “drone” sightings that turn out to be commercial aircraft. Many of the reports line up with known changes to FAA Air Traffic Control corridors. Over the summer, the FAA shifted the control of the Newark airspace sector (where many of the reports originate) from New York to Philadelphia. As this airspace is one of the busiest in the world, it is very likely that vectoring procedures have changed a bit, and people on the ground who are not used to seeing low-flying aircraft may be confusing landing aircraft with the now-viral drone threat. In short, once the initial (and genuine) reports came out, everyone went outside at night and started seeing aircraft being vectored through their area, and mistaken these aircraft for UFOs or drones. This phenomenon has resulted in many false-reports gaining more notoriety than they should, which have in turn complicated the genuine reports of strange aircraft. Considering all factors, and the possibility that these “drones” are probably military platforms being tested at the moment, one pertinent question remains…why test a super-secret platform in a highly populated area where observers will see it? To that question, there are a few possible answers that vary extremely widely. For one, it could be a message to China and Russia, as in this testing is meant to be observed. The military has hundreds of ultra-secret testing sites where they can test platforms out of the public eye very easily. Especially considering the scale of the incidents (dozens of reports every night in densely populated residential areas), it’s very likely that whatever is going on is intentionally taking place in the view of the public. Another vastly more sinister possibility is that these platforms are not being tested…but that they are operational, and some exceptionally grave threat is so severe that classified military platforms are needed to respond to the threat (meaning that a threat is so dire, that the government is willing to let the cat out of the bag regarding a secret technology to respond to the threat). Obviously, this theory remains very speculative and impossible to confirm. However, it is a possibility (though a very remote one), so it’s worthy of consideration. A far more likely possibility that this is that whichever agency is testing these platforms either doesn’t care that they are seen, or they are incompetent when it comes to Operational Security (OPSEC). Normally, this would be a remote possibility as well. However, the past few years of spycraft blunders have really highlighted that federal agencies are not what they used to be. From the US Secret Service failing multiple times at their only job, to the FBI not being able to stop an attack that they didn’t help plan themselves, at the present moment it is not out of the question to posit that some random agency is largely oblivious to the state secrets they are putting on display to the public. On the other hand, this theory loses traction rather quickly based on one detail. Normally, when a super-secret agency and/or military unit gets caught with a breach of OPSEC, or gets caught by bystanders conducting clandestine training, once that story becomes viral the higher-ups shut it down or in effect tell that unit to “cool it”. This has not happened in New Jersey. Right now the Governor’s office is getting annoyed with this issue, local police are increasingly becoming fed up with having to deal with it, and this whole affair is way beyond what one might traditionally see if military testing of hardware is being detected by locals. As such, the balance of probability shifts back in favor of the first theory, that all of this is intended to be shown. All in all, at the present moment, this entire situation smells rather strongly of a military/government operation, though to what end remains up for debate. More generally, the concern expressed by locals regarding these aircraft is certainly justified. Over the past few years, the trust that citizens place in their government has never been lower. But more crucially, almost no one in government is interested in repairing this relationship. This parallel existence, where government does whatever it wants, without bothering to even acknowledge a citizenry’s national security concerns at all, is causing problems that are interfering with daily life in many cases. Even at the height of the Soviet Union, the Party could only play classical music on the radio for so long before the people became restless. Now, after years of national security concerns ranging from Chinese balloons and aircraft, biological weapons, cyberattacks, and now mysterious drones, the American citizen is owed answers…answers that will not come. The recent allegations of Iranian involvement likewise do not do anything to improve the lack of trust the American people have in their government. For one, taking the claims of a Congressman seriously for a moment, if Iran did indeed have a “mothership” parked off the New Jersey coast, where are the photos of it? More specifically, where is the data suggesting that the drones are originating from a naval platform? Why are Iranian drones somehow familiar and compliant with the FAA’s regulations? The idea that the Iranians are behind it could be an attempt to prey on Americans’ knowledge that the last time our airspace was violated, NORAD actively concealed that threat to the homeland. This detail provides an advantage to those who seek to manipulate others; they know that the American people don’t trust any sort of homeland defense, so by blaming the Iranians for something that is well outside the realm of their technical ability to do, despite the contradictory details, will probably be an effective information operation. In short, the majority of people will buy the Iranian involvement story hook, line, and sinker, because the federal government knows that most people are incapable of discernment and understanding the nuance of the differences between the previous Chinese Spy Balloon incident, and what is happening now in New Jersey. What’s actually happening remains unclear, but it’s an utterly brilliant potential for an information operation; the US government gets to spin people up using their own toys, and blame Iran at the same time. Even more specifically, by allowing events to unfold in the way that they have, and knowing that most commentary about these events will not be carefully worded in any way, the powers that be also negate the threat to the homeland. Indeed, most Americans would probably approve of the US shooting down hostile drones over American soil, justifiably so. After all, when the rubber meets the road when it comes to national defense, a “shoot-first, ask questions later” mentality is appreciated with regards to threats to the homeland. On the one hand, the US government clearly has concealed active threats to the homeland before…but on the other hand that doesn’t automatically translate to hostile action this time, especially since most if not all indications point to these drone sightings being the result of American government activities in the first place. This is not a zero-sum idea; the US government can be incompetent when it comes to preventing attacks on the homeland, but that doesn’t mean that this is what’s happening in this instance. More broadly, it is even more wise to look at the nature of the incident from the other side of the coin…what emotion is this event intended to result in? What action, as well? If the US government were trying to stoke a war with Iran, would this be something that achieves that effect? Who would stand to gain with a war with Iran, and do those players have a better chance of having this technology than Iran herself? Do the people claiming that it is Iran, also have a history of desiring a war with Iran, or also have a financial interest in encouraging such? Is it more likely for Iran to have done this, or for a malign actor to want us to think that Iran did this? At the end of the day, this highlights the need for the average person to strive for discernment. Obviously, real threats to the homeland should be investigated thoroughly, but not so thoroughly that the speed and violence of action of a defensive response is lost. On the other hand, when manipulation has been going on for so long that we have a predisposition to be vulnerable to it, seeking the ability to discern the truth is paramount, in some cases more important than a knee-jerk defensive action. When the potential is massive for text-book cases of false flags to be undertaken, discernment may be the only thing that saves a situation from spiraling out of hand. In other words, a malign actor may even conduct an attack on the homeland, with the intent of sparking a knee-jerk reaction. That immediate reflex is what malign actors capitalize on, so even in the wake of what may be even more serious incidents like this one over the next few years, having the ability to stop for a moment and reexamine one’s self and one’s own perspective is more important now, than ever. Going to war should never be taken lightly, and consequently the details that may lead down that road are always worth a closer examination. Far too many hasten to kill, but very few people apply even more deliberation to finding ways of not killing. Wars are often started on the flimsiest piece of evidence imaginable, and peace rarely comes even with libraries of evidence pointing to war’s futile nature. When all signs point to war, it would be wise to examine who is holding the sign itself. Analyst: S2A1 //END REPORT//

This episode is brought to you by AG1.Take ownership of your health with AG1 and get a FREE 1-year supply of Vitamin D3+K2 AND 5 free Travel Packs with your first subscription. Go to http://drinkag1.com/joerogan Jimmy Corsetti and Dan Richards are independent researchers whose YouTube channels, "Bright Insight" and "DeDunking the Past," respectively, examine lost civilizations and alternative history. YouTube: https://youtu.be/SbW6FTU69bw?si=itt1bsdYPjr0FBbP Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/episode/2aqInuaHpiKCLaTKpsSOqy

Mike Benz is a former official with the U.S. Department of State and current Executive Director of the Foundation For Freedom Online, is a free speech watchdog organization dedicated to restoring the promise of a free and open Internet. www.foundationforfreedomonline.com YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rrJhQpvlkLA

The Gobekli Tepe Conspiracy is REAL, and they just BANNED me from Gobekli Tepe! - SPONSOR: http://www.Pawsitive.com/BRIGHTINSIGHT for 15% off and pick up a Pet Emergency Kit today!

SPONSOR! Order today at http://www.BENAKED.com/VIVA - code VIVA to save 15% off your order

Direct links to Marc’s book and substack Amazon.com (USA) https://www.amazon.com/NEEDLES-SECRET-UNRAVELING-MYSTERY-REVOLUTION/dp/B0CYLSCMHN/ref=cm_cr_arp_d_product_top?ie=UTF8 UK Amazon https://www.amazon.co.uk/NEEDLES-SECRET-UNRAVELING-MYSTERY-REVOLUTION/dp/B0CYLSCMHN/ref=cm_cr_arp_d_product_top?ie=UTF8 Australia Amazon https://www.amazon.com.au/NEEDLES-SECRET-UNRAVELING-MYSTERY-REVOLUTION/dp/B0CYLSCMHN/ref=cm_cr_arp_d_product_top?ie=UTF8 The Bolus Theory Series on Substack https://covidmythbuster.substack.com My Bolus Theory website https://marcgirardot.com

Are the Covid-19 drugs produced by Pfizer and Moderna GMOs or genetically modified organisms? https://julesonthebeach.substack.com/p/zee-fda-had-zee-science-but-intentionally https://www.givesendgo.com/GAVAZ An Australian Federal Court case has evidence to say they are GMOs Case File Number: VID510/2023 Dr Julian Fidge v. Pfizer Australia Pty Ltd & Moderna Pty Ltd Dr Fidge is an Australian medical doctor and trained pharmacist. The case has been brought under the Australian Gene Technology Act 2000 Section 10 of Gene Technology Act defines what a Genetically Modified Organism (GMO) is. First, an Organism is: ‘any biological entity’ ‘capable of transferring genetic material’ The Pfizer and Moderna Covid products contain LNP-modRNA complexes These complexes satisfy being called ‘any biological entity’ under the law The modRNA is genetic material The Lipid Nanoparticles or LNPs encapsulate the modRNA and together bio-distribute and transfer the LNP-modRNA complexes throughout the human body The LNPs then transfect and transfer the modRNA cargo across cell membranes to deliver the modRNA inside cells By moving the modRNA about the body and then into cells, the LNP-modRNA complexes physically transfer genetic material after injection So the Organism part of the GMO definition is satisfied by the physical mode of transport of the LNP-modRNA complexes The next part of the GMO legal definition is – a Genetically Modified Organism is: an organism that has been modified by gene technology The Gene Technology part requires showing: any technique for the modification of genes or other genetic material. Pfizer and Moderna admit they modify genes to create modified RNA or modRNA for their products The MHRA, EMA, FDA, and TGA when approving the Covid-19 products recognised Pfizer and Moderna use modified nucleosides for the modRNA In the TGA Australian approval for Pfizer for example, the TGA notes: The Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine, BNT162b2 mRNA (tradename Comirnaty), comprises a nucleoside-modified messenger RNA (modRNA) encoding the viral spike glycoprotein (S) of SARS-CoV-2. Pfizer and Moderna create their modified nucleosides in the lab using recombinant techniques So the Gene Technology part of the GMO legal definition is also satisfied This means the Pfizer and Moderna Covid-19 products satisfy the Australian legal definitions for being properly called GMOs Under the Australian Gene Technology Act anyone who ‘deals’ with a GMO in Australia must be regulated under a GMO licence Pfizer and Moderna failed to apply for GMO licences in Australia Dealing with GMOs in Australia without a GMO licence is a serious criminal offense under Section 32 of the Gene Technology Act 2000 In fact the boss of Australia’s Office of the Gene Technology Regulator, or OGTR, recently admitted to an Australian Senate Committee that both the Pfizer and Moderna products are GMOs No Australian was told by the OGTR or the TGA that they were being asked to receive Genetically Modified Organisms or GMOs when getting a Covid-19 injection This is not just an Australian GMO legal issue In the United Kingdom Genetically Modified Organisms are dealt with under the Environmental Protection Act 1990 and specifically Section 106 under Part VI The United Kingdom legal definitions for what is regarded as a GMO is almost identical to the Australian legal definitions we just looked at Like in Australia, the United Kingdom requires new GMOs to be subjected to an extensive Risk Assessment Even after an extensive Risk Assessment the United Kingdom Secretary of State still has to provide a Consent before a GMO can be introduced into the United Kingdom The MHRA knew United Kingdom GMO legal definitions applied to Pfizer and Moderna because it is their job to know and they have GMO experts But both Pfizer and Moderna applied for marketing approvals under the Human Medicines Regulations 2012 which exempted them from having to undergo a GMO Risk Assessment for their Covid-19 products And because of that exemption neither company had to mention on the Product Information that their products contain GMOs even though they satisfy the legal definitions