Premium Only Content
If Only USCCA Had Done It Right: Part 1
NOTE: You can find "If Only USCCA Had Done It Right: Part 2" here: https://youtube.com/live/6qnuW7EHdpI
The United States Concealed Carry Association (USCCA) along with its partner Delta Defense LLC purport to pay their members legal expenses if the member is involved in a use-of force event. Indeed, their sophisticated internet advertising campaigns frequently feature CEO Tim Schmidt assuring the public that "We've got your back!"
In recent years, however, USCCA has refused to meet that apparent obligation to its members. When asked about this the organization has either provided no particularly substantive reasons--e.g., "we just feel we're not obligated to do so"--or has made up an outrageously not credible explanation months after the fact--e.g., "actually that member preferred we not help them."
It is for these reasons that I'm personally unable to recommend USCCA in good faith to anybody seeking legal services coverage in a use-of-force context.
That said, there DO EXIST scenarios in which it would arguably be appropriate for ANY use-of-force legal services company to decline to provide coverage--and we'll explore one of those scenarios in the context of a recent New Mexico Supreme Court decision.
If THIS had been USCCA's explanation for its repeated failure to cover its members, they'd have had a point. Too bad for them, however, that this was NOT their explanation.
Join me LIVE at 11AM ET to discuss!
THERE IS ONLY ONE SELF-DEFENSE "INSURANCE" PROVIDER I TRUST!
There are lots of self-defense "insurance" companies out there. Some are hot garbage. Some have limited resources. Some are simply, in my view, untrustworthy. But there is ONE that I PERSONALLY TRUST to protect myself and my family.
LEARN which ONE I TRUST by clicking HERE:
https://lawofselfdefense.com/trust
Disclaimer - Content is for educational & entertainment purposes only, and does not constitute legal advice. If you are in need of legal advice you must retain competent legal counsel in the relevant jurisdiction.
Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.
-
54:26
Law of Self Defense LLC
1 month agoBREAKING: Jordan Neely Had Pulse AFTER "Choke"
1.29K7 -
2:01:25
Roseanne Barr
18 hours ago $41.26 earnedJeff Dye | The Roseanne Barr Podcast #80
134K65 -
7:32
CoachTY
16 hours ago $12.19 earnedWHALES ARE BUYING AND RETAIL IS SELLING. THIS IS WHY PEOPLE STAY BROKE!!!
124K8 -
1:01:00
Talk Nerdy 2 Us
13 hours ago💻 From ransomware to global regulations, the digital battlefield is heating up!
36.1K2 -
3:00:24
I_Came_With_Fire_Podcast
15 hours agoHalf the Gov. goes MISSING, Trump day 1 Plans, IC finally tells the Truth, Jesus was NOT Palestinian
82.3K37 -
4:11:49
Nerdrotic
18 hours ago $42.87 earnedThe Best and Worst of 2024! Sony Blames Fans | Batman DELAYED | Nosferatu! |Friday Night Tights 334
201K38 -
7:55:51
Dr Disrespect
22 hours ago🔴LIVE - DR DISRESPECT - WARZONE - SHOTTY BOYS ATTACK
250K33 -
1:30:23
Twins Pod
21 hours agoHe Went From MARCHING With BLM To Shaking Hands With TRUMP! | Twins Pod - Episode 45 - Amir Odom
158K34 -
1:02:30
Exploring With Nug
23 hours ago $4.84 earned2 Duck Hunters Missing After Kayak Capsizes!
78.6K6 -
46:48
Mally_Mouse
16 hours agoLet's Hang!! -- Opening Christmas gifts from YOU!
84.1K1