BRICS oppose the major financial institutions

The World Economic Forum (WEF) has been the subject of various concerns and criticisms from different quarters. Central to these apprehensions is the perceived influence the WEF exerts on global policies and economic strategies, with critics arguing that its annual meetings in Davos serve as a rendezvous for the world's elite to shape global agendas in a way that prioritizes corporate interests over those of the broader public. This has sparked debates about the transparency and accountability of the WEF, as its gatherings are often seen as opaque, with decisions that potentially affect millions being made behind closed doors. Additionally, the environmental impact of the forum's activities, despite its focus on sustainability and climate change, also comes under scrutiny, with concerns about the carbon footprint of its high-profile meetings. Furthermore, the inclusivity and representation within the WEF have been questioned, as critics point out that its membership and participants tend to represent a narrow slice of the global elite, possibly side-lining the voices and concerns of less powerful stakeholders. These concerns highlight a broader debate about the role of such forums in global governance and their impact on democracy and equity worldwide.

In this video, we'll explore the World Economic Forum (WEF), tracing its origins, examining the criticisms it faces, and covering the concerns various individuals have regarding its effectiveness and fairness. Specifically, we'll delve into criticisms of the WEF's agenda, particularly its perceived bias against the Global South and BRICS nations, among others.