True Stolen History Part 4 Post-Reset War 19th Century And Real Origin Of The World

True Stolen History Part 4 Post-Reset War 19th Century And Real Origin Of The WorldShow more

True Stolen History Part 1 Lifting The Veil Of Deception And Real Origin Of The World: https://rumble.com/v2u0rpa-true-stolen-history-part-1-lifting-the-veil-of-deception-and-real-origin-of.html

True Stolen History Part 2 The Destruction Old World And Real Origin Of The World: https://rumble.com/v2u0ruk-true-stolen-history-part-2-the-destruction-old-world-and-real-origin-of-the.html

True Stolen History Part 3 Mystery Of The World's Fairs And Real Origin Of The World: https://rumble.com/v2u0rye-true-stolen-history-part-3-mystery-of-the-worlds-fairs-and-real-origin-of-t.html

True Stolen History Part 4 Post-Reset War 19th Century And Real Origin Of The World: https://rumble.com/v2u0s7e-true-stolen-history-part-4-post-reset-war-19th-century-and-real-origin-of-t.html

The official version of human history is a construct of lies. Our we in a state of collective amnesia. Let's free ourselves from the artificial matrix that has been imposed on us. Stolen History's documentarians begin their 4-Part Series with an introductory overview that challenges the entire historical narrative as we've been told. Post-Reset War of the 19th Century​. Did a world-wide Reset begin just after a world-wide calamity (c.1811-1819)? Did it jump-starting a decision by the Elites on their timing to unveil old tech and knowledge, and to ratchet up the "Industrial Revolution" as well as release it at coincidental World Fairs & "Exhibitions"?
All of this is highly speculative. These are just notes to organize and share my thoughts.
I have been thinking about a possible timeline of events of the last 300 or so years. I have touched on timelines previously: What Is Your Timeline Of World Events? Insane Asylums of the United States, Canada, UK and the rest of the World The latest JonLevi vid about New Zealand brought the timeline topic back to my awareness, and he also covers the mental asylums:
South of Tartaria

In this exploration of the southern reaches of our realm we will explore two cities for signs of...

The more I think about it, the more I am convinced that it is extremely difficult to come up with evidence for anything happening pre-1700.

What I struggle with about our recent past is a good understanding of the possible relationship between multiple reset events (natural cataclysms/global wars).

I want to share the picture that is emerging for me:

I get the impression that there are two relevant global reset events that define our current society. A great almost complete reset around 300 years ago, and another reset caused by a planetary post-reset war over the resources and power in the new post-reset world.

I suggest that there was a natural cataclysm around 300 years ago, followed by a time of civil renewal but also political intrigues and power struggles (1700-1800), which then epically and tragically culminated in a world war sometime around 1800 between two factions, one of which has been omitted from history (obviously the one that lost). This planetary conflict wasn't short but lasted decades, and it only ended around 1900, at least when the clean-up period of swallowing the remnants of the old kingdoms (India, Japan, China, Tartary, etc.) is taken into consideration as well.
Original Timeline​

Here's what I wrote back then:
1000 AD: a globally connected civilization gets destroyed and flooded due to an unknown event. Possibly high-tech and highly spiritual. Humans become divived into multiple fractions, different languages develop. Before this no modern oceans existed, and the earth was three equal parts with rivers in between and small "oceans" at both north and south pole: Africa (Libya), Europa, Asia; all named after prominent leaders from that time.
1100 - 1200 AD: People come together to preserve the pre-flood knowledge, try to live in truth and harmony, the Jesus figure as one of the leaders of that movement lived during that time.
1100-1300 AD: The first efforts are made to map the "new world" with the Mappa Mundis. Julius Caesar figure lives during that time, and is a big proponent of mapping things.
up to 1400 AD: Kingdoms and authorities get established, trading flourishes, money is used extensively.
Between 1400 and 1500 AD: Another global catastrophe happens, earth is expanding and the oceans are created as well as modern America, most of the kingdoms suffer greatly, climate gets a bit worse. The last survivors of the pre-flood civilizations die out (giants), as well as mythical creatures like dinosaurs and unicorns, and failures from genetic experiments.
Between 1400 and 1700 AD: Kingdoms are being re-established, life goes on, even though it's a bit more difficult than before, the 4 seasons are established. Some people start to create "religion" because after the 1400 catastrophe the memories of what the Gnostics and other groups tried to achieve fades away. The independent gnostic groups fight against the corrupt church institutions in Central Europe and elsewhere. "For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places." They understand that evil creates pyramidal chain of commands that transcend individuals. Writings are shared between those groups, which are re-written by the Church during 1600-1800 and published as the bible. The thirty-years war in the 17th century is an encrypted and highly distorted memory of that fight. The Church decides to add 1000 years to recent history and invents a new calendar, which is to be enforced globally. Competing native calendars are destroyed, and the accompanying myths alongside.
In 1690 AD another global cataclysm hits with a second earth expanding event, climate gets really bad and the dark forces begin to envelop the globe. This event destroys most technological knowledge of the past, and creates the last survivors of "ancient" kingdoms, but their power is gone. The institutional churches and secret societies from Europe use this event to colonize the entire world, and rewrite history on every continent. New maps and narratives are being created. The remnants of Tartary and other civilization get overrun between 1690 and 1850 due to their military weakness.
"Science" is established between 1690 and 1850, and tries to destroy all previous knowledge about cataclysms, religion and cosmology.
Another cataclysm happens ca 1816 with the "year without a summer" as a surviving concept. It doesn't destroy as much structures as the other events before, but it costs many people their lifes, and gives rise to industrialization. The small group connected to the European Churches has secretly kept some of the pre 1816 knowledge and slowly re-introduces some of that knowledge to society. This is known as the industrial age to the un-initiated.
1900: People still remember some parts of the true history and the decision is being made to invent communism to destroy all the remaining high culture in the eastern parts of the world, and the two world wars are enough to destroy the remaining knowledge in the west as well.
Grand Technological and Cultural Reset of 1700

Piranesi - Rome in Ruins​

See my post in the first link. The date is more or less just a placeholder. 1700 could also easily be 250 years in the past, or 400, but the maps point to 1700.

This is what creates all the ruins archeologists put 2000 years into the past, and the late renaissance paintings of Rome in ruins is after that event. Most buildings from that time have crumbled to dust. Its hard to say if this event is equal to the event of the biblical flood that gave us all the petrified remains of a high tech civilization. there could have been another grand reset event way before 1700.

But this 1700 event is when Africa turned into a desert, when South America turned into a forest, and when the Northern Hemisphere turned into a wasteland.

The map changes (bigger oceans, america splitting of from Asia, etc) give the impression of a natural cataclysm.

What kind of relevance does the War of 1756 have?

World War of 1800

Originally I thought whatever happened around 1800 was another natural cataclysm but it starts to look more and more like a world war.

This war of sorts is also what causes the mudflood event. It creates all the buried buildings, and the destroyed American cities happen at the same time or shortly afterwards.

All of the following events are roughly the same event, artificially split up:
Destroyed/burned down American cities​
American Civil War​
New Madrid Earthquake of 1812​
Mystery Eruption 1808​
Great Comet of 1811​
War of 1812​
The Year Without a Summer 1816​
Napoleon/new order in Europe​
Mudflooded buildings​
etc.​
Both events - the great reset of 1700 and the world war of 1800 - would be tied together, because what’s most interesting is what happened in between, in the time period of 1700-1800.

i think the universal renaissance-style architecture is evidence that after the 1700 event, civilization built out all of the “neoclassical” architecture and cities within a very short time period. It was a massive post-catastrophe effort of rebuilding society anew. And despite the reset of 1700 they had so many resources and knowledge left that they were able to build all those buildings.

All of the pre-reset architecture we see today was built in such a small time frame that we can’t comprehend this effort with our current understanding of how buildings can be built.

At the moment, I don't have many more details about the war/cataclysm 200 years ago, other that I suggest most relevant events around that time have a common root, but there is no direct evidence to prove it.

In this thread I suggested that, for example, the War of Independence was probably not a war between The USA and Great Britain, but a war between USA/Great Britain on one side, and the original inhabitants of North America on the other side:
How dou you manage to change the history of something like the "American War of Independence"? Simple, just like the war between the Western Forces and Russian Tartary became the war between Western forces (Napoleon vs Moscow) you simply omit the enemy from the list and draw some arbitrary lines between the western Forces. Note that the true enemy of the Westerners had to be included somehow, similar as the Tartars became "Mercenaries" the American Tartars became "American Indians", conveniently on both sides so Historians would not become suspicious when coming across historical evidence for an obvious conflict between Natives and Westerners during the war.

We are told the American Indians willingly traded in their independence for Alcohol and weapons, but what if they only succumbed to Alcohol after their entire civilization was destroyed and the only thing that was left were a couple of tents?
There is also some evidence that the PTB did a similar trick with Napoleon in Russia, and hid the true enemy.

This is roughly what I think happened 200 years ago, not only in the US but on many continents. They real enemy of the world war of 1800 has been omitted from history. They were the original builders of the renaissance-style architecture, and unfortunately they lost to the forces of darkness.

Insane Asylums as prisons for those who resist​

It is no coincidence these places pop up directly after the mudflood and post-reset times of the early 19th Century. They were places for those who couldn't cope with the changes or those who resisted the new rulers.​
​
In the 18th century, with the breakdown of the "ancient regime", or say, the "ancient world", the enemies of the new order are being persecuted. It is an open battle that lasts for a couple of decades, new kingdoms and governments form, free thinkers and knowledge is being destroyed.​
​
After maybe 2 generations, let's say in the beginning of the 19th century, the PTB is in power, but there are still people who won't give in and/or can't function in the new world. For those people they create more formal prisons, which become the insane asylums, where they are mixed with the truly "insane" (i.e. those who can't function in any way). We can think of those institutions as prisons for both the resistance, as well as places to collect those negatively affected by the past cataclysm. Obviously they just used the buildungs that were alerady available, which explains the architecture.​
​
Inprisoning the resistance would be a high priority task, which explains why they allowed those buildings to be used.​

Observations/suggestions:
1. The quick and coherent rebuilding after the Great Reset in the unified global architecture style post-1700 suggests a connected, highly intelligent, cooperative and mostly peaceful civil society.​
2. In those times, there exist already elements that divide and conquer, but they still don’t have the power to overthrow society (some kingdoms in Europe, the Vatican, etc)​
The mudflood in the 19th century is surprising, because it means that within 100 years of the first reset, something big happened again.

But this time, most of the cities were still functional afterwards. So maybe in reality we are looking at a world war of sorts or global accident, or both.

A post-reset world war as a consequence of malfunctioning free energy devices built into all the buildings, thus attracting the mud? Or simply a world war where Europe was the winner? I don’t think the buildings sank, for some reason the soil came from above, without harming the buildings.
Results of this event (imho)​
The post-reset war of 1800 birthed our modern society, and many things that define our current way of life can be traced back to the 19th Century. The way of life in the 18th Century is so different to ours that if we would put both next to each other we could almost talk about two different universes. The fact that we do not remember, collectively, is all thats needed to prove how alienated we are from our own ancestors.
Colonialism/Imperialism to run over the weakened areas (colonialist power was at its height in the 19th century). Also basically to sent out scouts into the entire world as no one really knew what’s going on in the depopulated area after the reset. Then dismantle the kingdoms and install democracy. The history of colonialism/imperialism has been artificially lengthened to hide the importance of the 19th century. Consider the two periods of imperialism in India: We are told the first period lastet from 1740 to 1858 with the economic control via the East India Trading company, but only in 1858 did the British actually invade India, thus starting the colonialist phase of imperialism. I suggest that the history before 1858 is largely made up to support the myth of the long time frame of colonialism.​
Empty cities of the American West, as the repopulation took quite a while​
Complete destruction of Tartaria and a couple other free nations​
Cataclysm in the Northern Hemisphere: Almost complete destruction of the northern areas of the world, suggesting a cataclysm or weapon of enormous power​
Massive destruction of Roman Style Cities in North America to bring reality in line with the idea that North America was only inhabited by primitive Natives.​
Industrialisation and Robber Barons to reintroduce stolen knowledge (full effect of Industrialisation not felt until the 1840s)​
Globally coordinated effort of running the World Fairs to bring the stolen knowledge to the masses (first started around 1860 I think)​
Mental Asylums to control the dissidents and those in shock (first came up around 1800-1840)​
Modern medicine and education as crowd control (mandatory schooling emanating from europe in the 18th century)​
Orphan trains and church run foundling business, to repopulate the depopulated areas of the world
Tasking freemasons to organize the free post-reset masonry​
“Science” is being pushed on the population​
Central Banking to control the economy​
Communism (potentially with cloning involved, in China, India, Russia) to destroy the east​
Two world wars to destroy the old-world architecture and knowledge in Central Europe, bring the awareness of the population down to the average global level​
Inventing the Neoclassicist architecture myth

Around 100 years ago, there was a global effort to redate the architectural remains of the unified culture of the past. Most of the buildings in Europe were simply redated to 1890-1910, and those dates were often chiseled onto the front of the houses. Since it was such a coordinated effort, and all evidence of the existence of this architecture pre-Neoclassicism has been purged, it suggests a united secret force behind most nations already at the turn of the 19th to the 20th Century. When I lived in Hamburg, Germany, I discovered a building with two dates on its front: It said "built in 1900, commissioned in 1490" Who needs 400 years to build a house?

Most important parts of the history rewriting:​
Make free atmospheric energy disappear
Say that all buildings were only created around 100 years ago (Gründerzeit Architektur)
Invent an older story for colonialism
Create a big gap between the Insane Asylums and the Witch Hunts, so people don't see that both are the same event
Redate photos, maps, and paintings
Invent architects, etc.
Invent stories of fires in North America
So I’d say we are only around 200 years apart from the unified free energy culture.

I suggest that there was a natural cataclysm around 300 years ago, followed by a time of civil renewal but also political intrigues and power struggles (1700-1800), which then epically and tragically culminated in a world war sometime around 1800 between two factions, one of which has been omitted from history (obviously the one that lost). This planetary conflict wasn't short but lasted decades, and it only ended around 1900, at least when the clean-up period of swallowing the remnants of the old kingdoms (India, Japan, China, Tartary, etc.) is taken into consideration as well.

Amazing post overall! Just a quick note here that winners can omit themselves from history, too.

Lets use this thread to research the history of the Civil War before the leftist academics purged it's history in the 1960s.

The following is a book review of Southern Scribblings by Brion T. McClanahan. I haven't read the book yet but it's probably a good start to get a better picture of what really happened back then. A primary theme is that the Southern States hated the Central Government (probably Vatican-infiltrated) that began to form in Washington, and due to their enourmous resistance, a big war was waged against the Southerners - in my view they were part of the "Old World" remnants - the Old World is defined by an absence of Central Governance and corrupt power structures.

The American History You’re Not Supposed to Know - By Thomas DiLorenzo August 7, 2020​
​
Brion McClanahan’s new book, Southern Scriblings, contains sixty scholarly and eloquently-written essays about the American history you are not supposed to know. The reason you are not supposed to know about it is America’s first cultural war that long preceded the current one and is still ongoing.​
​
That “war” began with the New England Puritans, whose philosophical descendants became the universally despised “Yankees.” These are people mostly from New England and the upper Mid-West originally who believed that they were superior to all others and therefore had a “right” to govern over them, by force if necessary. They have a mindset of what Judge Napolitano calls “libido dominandi,” or the lust to dominate. Today, Hillary Clinton would be what Clyde Wilson has called “a museum-quality specimen” of a Yankee. Yankees are a component of both political parties, but today’s Democratic party is the home of the most extreme ones, who seem to be part Yankee and part Stalinist totalitarian with their university speech codes, their “cancel culture,” their utopian plans to centrally plan all aspects of everyone’s life with their “Green New Deal,” to confiscate private wealth, communist style, with “wealth taxes,” and so on.​
​
After waging total war on the entire civilian population of the South from 1861-1865, murdering hundreds of thousands, the Yankees commenced a “holy war” against American history and especially Southern history, a major theme of Southern Scribblings. In war, the victors always write the history to portray themselves in the best light possible, no matter what the truth is. The Yankees have been doing this for more than 150 years, as McClanahan describes in essay after essay.​
​
Among the things you will learn from this book are why Hamiltonian statism has always been the enemy of American freedom and a poisonous threat to genuine, free-market capitalism. Most Americans would also be surprised to learn that, after the War to Prevent Southern Independence, there was a monumental effort at reconciliation, lasting for generations, and supported by presidents from McKinley to Bill Clinton. McClanahan calls Jimmy Carter “the last Jeffersonian president” and discusses how “Memorial Day” began as “Decoration Day” where the sacrifices of soldiers on both sides of the “Civil War” were recognized. This of course is no longer the case thanks to the stultification of America by the country’s own universities over the past generation.​
​
Prior to the 1960s “Civil War” history was much more honest and truthful than it has become ever since then. For example, everyone understood that the tariff was the main bone of contention between the Yankees of the North, who wanted a 50% (and higher) protectionist tariff, whereas the South wanted its entire country to be a free-trade zone with minimal “revenue tariffs.” Republican party newspapers even editorialized in favor of bombarding the Southern ports before the war because they understood that free trade in the South would be devastating to the Northern plutocracy.​
​
Everyone also understood that slavery had nothing to do with why Lincoln launched a military invasion of his own country because they were familiar with his own words and the 1861 war aims resolution of the U.S. Congress. That all changed in the 1960s when Leftist historians like Kenneth Stampp decided that the history of the war and reconstruction should be rewritten so as to portray the New England Yankees as angels of salvation who were willing to die by the hundreds of thousands solely for the benefit of black strangers a thousand miles away. (McClanahan points out the truth that racism and white supremacy was worse in the North than in the South in the nineteenth century, something that even Toqueville wrote about in Democracy in America).​
​
At the same time the history profession since the 1960s contrasted angelic Northern saviors to the descendants of Jefferson, Madison, Monroe, Jackson, and other Southerners as the most evil and decadent human beings to ever inhabit the earth. This of course is the current politically-correct view of everyone and everything Southern in the eyes of the left-wing political elite.​
​
Southern Scribblings explains what a big, steaming pile of horse manure this all is, along with the incredible hypocrisy of “Northern self righteousness.” It has fueled the fires of “PC Lunacy,” a section of the book containing nine hard-hitting essays.​
​
You will also learn how insidious the academic history profession is with book after book having been written with false narratives about the “lost cause.” As the only group of Americans who ever seriously challenged the tyrannical impulses of the central government, Southerners must be demonized for eternity in the eyes of the Puritan/Yankee culture that lords over American academe – and much of the rest of society.​
​
The most interesting chapters to your author are the ones that dissect the Leftist and neo-conservative smearing of such Southern figures as Robert E. Lee and John C. Calhoun and their never-ending deification of Lincoln. The chapters on “the real Robert E. Lee” is worth the price of the book. Addressing the current effort by the ignoramus governor of Virginia, among others, to get the statue of Lee removed from the national Capitol building in Washington, McClanahan writes: “No one as grand as Lee . . . should be surrounded by such reptiles in Washington” anyway.​
​
Few Southerners have been as vilified as John C. Calhoun, a former secretary of war, secretary of state, vice president, senator, and representative. The real reason for this vilification has nothing to do with slavery, but with the fact that, philosophically, Calhoun was “too much” of a Jeffersonian and a champion of federalism, states’ rights, and decentralization, deadly poisons to all would-be tyrants and dictators. His Disquisition on Government is one of the greatest treatises on political philosophy ever written by an American and was a favorite of Murray Rothbard’s, who cited him in many of his writings.​
​
McClanahan discusses many of the key ideas in the Disquisition in several essays on Calhoun. After reading them you will understand the evil and dishonesty of his detractors, from neocons like Victor Davis Hanson to just about the entire academic history profession, which after all is dominated by self-described Marxists.​
​
History - in respect to our Government, is not what we might think.
I wanted to post this as my first one after my return, because I believe it to be important.
Please read it, even though it is longish, and consider what we have been told, and what we expect from
the two party system we are under, and whether ANYTHING is true. Because here is the written evidence,
from their own hands, signed by presidents of both parties, from Jimmy Peanut Carter through Mr. Biden,
including Trump, that actually we don't have two parties - just one agenda.
And it reflects directly on the belief systems of a great many Americans.
It doesn't matter much if you are religious or not in order to understand this - the idea is that they sell out,
or pretend to, while at the same time appearing to support us. Enjoy and please comment if you will.

In the very beginning of this diatribe against the unfair application of laws by elected officials in this Great and Free United States of America, I should make two statements so that you know roughly where I am coming from.

First, I consider myself to be a Christian. Perhaps not exactly of the type that you might currently sit next to on Sunday, but a believer all the same. I have no problem with religious beliefs or non-beliefs, of any type.

And Secondly, while I personally have not identified as anything other than a heterosexual male since birth, I have no problem with your own choices, whatever they might be. That's why they are called "your" choices.

What I have a problem with, as outlined here, is any instance in which our Constitution, which seems to ensure us of certain "rights", is not being followed by our elected officials. And also with the general notion that we can tell American Citizens what to believe or not believe in, in respect to their religious views or sexual orientation choices.

I am also not an anti-Semitic, and I do not connect the fact that some of these suggested changes from our elected officials, as outlined below, result from anything other than their own choices. Were they attempting to garner votes? Obviously. But perhaps what we should examine even more closely is just how in line the Democrat and Republican leaders actually are, even if they publicly claim to be very different from each other on moral issues.

What's one idea that all of our Presidents, of both the Democratic and Republican versions, and the members of House and Senate, again of both parties, can agree upon? That Atheists and Non-Heterosexual are not in conformance
with the moral values that we wish to uphold as a Nation, and that the laws given to the Biblical Noah should be upheld, and furthermore that we should "Establish Courts/Legal System to Ensure Law Obedience". What?

A National Education and Sharing Day is observed annually on the 11th day of the month of Nisan on the Jewish calendar – or 4 days before Passover begins. President Jimmy Carter first inaugurated this day on April 18, 1978.

How did they accomplish this? By naming it the "Education Day" rather than the "let's uphold the Biblical Laws as given to Noah Day". And why is this important to us here today? Because these Noahide laws are Very Different and Very Strange, when compared to Christianity.

Here's the request from the Congress of the USA to Jimmy Carter:

PUBLIC LAW 95-262—APR. 17, 1978
Public Law 95-262 95th Congress
Joint Resolution Apr. 17. 1978 [HJ. Res. 770]
Education Day, U.S.A. Designation authorization.

"To authorize and request the President to issue a proclamation designating April 18, 1978, as "Education Day, P.S.A.".

Whereas the Congress recognizes a need for the Nation to set aside on the calendar a day devoted to the importance of education to the lives of its citizens and to the general well-being of the Nation; and Whereas the Lubavitch Movement, which conducts educational activities at more than sixty centers in twenty-eight States as well as around the world, is especially committed to the advancement of education and has proposed the establishment of an "Education Day, U.S.A."; and Whereas world Jewry marked in 1977 the seventy-fifth birthday of the revered and renowned Jewish leader, the head of the worldwide Lubavitch Movement, Rabbi Menachem Mendel Schneerson, who proclaimed on that occasion a "Year of Education*'; and Whereas the seventy-sixth birthday of this celebrated spiritual leader will occur on April 18, 1978, thus concluding the year of Lubavitch Movement activities dedicated to the "Year of Education" and the Lubavitcher Rebbe's milestone birthday: Now, therefore, be it Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That the President is authorized and requested to issue a proclamation designating April 18, 1978, as "Education Day, U.S.A.".

Approved April 17, 1978. CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 124 (1978): Apr. 11, 12, considered and passed House. Apr. 13, considered and passed Senate.

So just who is Rabbi Menachem Mendel Schneerson, and what is his movement all about?

Menachem Mendel Schneerson encouraged his followers on many occasions to preach the Seven Laws of Noah. Since the 1990s, Orthodox Jewish rabbis from Israel, most notably those affiliated to Chabad-Lubavitch and religious Zionist organizations, have set up a modern Noahide movement.

These Noahide organizations, led by religious Zionist and Orthodox rabbis, are aimed at non-Jews in order to proselytize among them and commit them to follow the Noahide laws. However, these religious Zionist and Orthodox rabbis that guide the modern Noahide movement, who are often affiliated with the Third Temple movement, are accused of expounding a racist and supremacist ideology which consists in the belief that the Jewish people are God's chosen nation and racially superior to non-Jews, and mentor Noahides because they believe that the Messianic era will begin with the rebuilding of the Third Temple on the Temple Mount in Jerusalem to re-institute the Jewish priesthood along with the practice of ritual sacrifices, and the establishment of a Jewish theocracy in Israel, supported by communities of Noahides.

And our Congress and Presidents are all in agreement on this:

Democratic President Jimmy Carter first inaugurated this day on April 18, 1978.

Republican Ronald Reagan, 40th President of the United States: 1981 - 1989
Proclamation 4921—National Day of Reflection and later National Day of Education.

Here's a excerpt from his proclamation, and the joint Congressional resolution:

"We seek, and steadfastly pursue, the benefits of education. But education must be more than factual enlightenment—it must enrich the character as well as the mind.

One shining example for people of all faiths of what education ought to be is that provided by the Lubavitch movement, headed by Rabbi Menachem Schneerson, a worldwide spiritual leader who will celebrate his 80th birthday on April 4, 1982. The Lubavitcher Rebbe's work stands as a reminder that knowledge is an unworthy goal unless it is accompanied by moral and spiritual wisdom and understanding. He has provided a vivid example of the eternal validity of the Seven Noahide Laws, a moral code for all of us regardless of religious faith. May he go from strength to strength."

You can see this same mention of Rabbi Schneerson and the Seven Noahide Laws in yearly publications made by every President from Carter to Biden. What? Sounds crazy, right? But true it is.

Republican President George H.W. Bush
41st President of the United States: 1989 - 1993
Proclamation 5956—Education Day, U.S.A., 1989 and 1990
April 14, 1989

We find nearly the same words used by every President, here is Bush the fathers:

"Ethical values are the foundation for civilized society. A society that fails to recognize or adhere to them cannot endure.

The principles of moral and ethical conduct that have formed the basis for all civilizations come to us, in part, from the centuries-old Seven Noahide Laws. The Noahide Laws are actually seven commandments given to man by God, as recorded in the Old Testament. These commandments include prohibitions against murder, robbery, adultery, blasphemy, and greed, as well as the positive order to establish courts of justice.

Through the leadership of Rabbi Menachem Schneerson and the worldwide Lubavitch movement, the Noahide Law -- and standards of conduct duly derived from them -- have been promulgated around the globe."

And here's a mention of this from a dot gov page: March, 1991. "The U.S. Congress officially recognized the Noahide Laws in legislation which was passed by both houses. Congress and the President of the United States, George Bush, indicated in Public Law 102-14, 102nd Congress, that the United States of America was founded upon the Seven Universal Laws of Noah, and that these Laws have been the bedrock of society from the dawn of civilization."

How could George H. W. Bush and the Congress sign into law a law which states the USA was founded on anti-blasphemy laws and other strict ancient codes, and that we should set up courts to enforce this?

Democratic President Bill Clinton also agreed to this, and wrote in his own proclamation of 1995:

"Rabbi Menachem Mendel Schneerson, the Lubavitcher Rebbe, well understood the importance of nurturing the heart along with the mind. Throughout his long and rich life, he believed that the education of our young people would only be successful if it sought to build character as well as intellect, if it taught the lessons of honesty, tolerance, and good citizenship, as well as language, math, and science. "

" This year, let us rededicate ourselves to teaching the love of learning that was championed by Rabbi Schneerson and is strengthened by caring leaders like him throughout our Nation. As we provide our students with the information and practical tools they need, let us also pass on to them the capacity for understanding that can help to give fuller meaning to their lives."

Here we see Clinton asking that our children be taught "the lessons of honesty, tolerance, and good citizenship" along with the sciences. Did he even read the Noahide Laws? Because they don't call for tolerance in regard to religious beliefs nor in regard to sexual preferences or gender choices, as is very clear by the text itself, which I have reproduced below.

Republican President George W. Bush wrote in his proclamation on Education and Sharing Day 2007:

"Education and Sharing Day honors The Rebbe and emphasizes our commitment to teach the next generation of Americans the values that make our country strong. The Lubavitcher Rabbi believes that society should 'make a new commitment to kindness,' and he helped to establish education and outreach centers offering social service programs and humanitarian aid around the world."

Does this sound something like a canned script that is confirmed by both houses of Congress and then signed by every sitting President? It does to me - because the language is nearly identical in mentioning the Rebbe and Noahide Laws no matter which year it was written it in or which President proclaimed it.

Democratic President Barack Obama wrote in his proclamation on Education & Sharing Day 2009:

"Few have better understood or more successfully promoted these ideas than Rabbi Menachem Mendel Schneerson, the Lubavitcher Rebbe, who emphasized the importance of education and good character. Through the establishment of educational and social service institutions across the country and the world, Rabbi Schneerson sought to empower young people and inspire individuals of all ages. On this day, we raise his call anew."

Oh, but surely the Champion of Justice, the one who was elected to drain the swamp and change the attitudes and the traditionally held views of the President of the United States,
could not agree to this? Surely he would be different? But, sadly, he was not.

Republican President Donald Trump wrote in his proclamation on Education & Sharing Day 2017:

"Education and Sharing Day recognizes the remarkable efforts of Rabbi Menachem Mendel Schneerson, the Lubavitcher Rebbe, to use values-based education to drive our Nation's children toward the American Dream. As an educator, Rabbi Schneerson understands that education is incomplete if it is devoid of moral development. Working through a spirit of optimism, he strives to teach children to be honest, civil, respectful of differences, and self-disciplined, in addition to being intellectually rigorous."

OK. But now we have Joe Biden. The one who absolutely did not copy anything that Trump did, and who works very hard to change things back to the way they should have been, prior to Trump, would straighten this out once and for all? No.

Democratic President Joe Biden wrote in his proclamation on Education and Sharing Day 2021:

"We are at our best when we work together and help our neighbors, whether down the road or around the world. This lesson is at the heart of Education and Sharing Day, U.S.A., when we celebrate the role models, mentors, and leaders who devote themselves to the progress and success of each new generation, to reinforcing our common bonds, and to lifting up our highest ideals. " And Biden continues with: "Today, we mark the legacy of Rabbi Menachem Mendel Schneerson, the Lubavitcher Rebbe, a guiding light of In Lemon v. Kurtzman (1971), the Court established a three-pronged test for laws dealing with religious establishment. To be constitutional a statute must have “a secular legislative purpose,” it must have principal effects that neither advance nor inhibit religion, and it must not foster “an excessive government entanglement with religion.”

The Schempp family brought a lawsuit that led to a 1963 ruling by the Supreme Court in Abington School District v. Schempp. It banned bible reading and the recitation of The Lord's Prayer in public schools, saying that it violated the First Amendment's establishment clause requiring separation of church and state.

In County of Allegheny v. American Civil Liberties Union (1989), a group of justices led by Justice Anthony M. Kennedy in his dissent developed a coercion test: the government does not violate the establishment clause unless it provides direct aid to religion in a way that would tend to establish a state church or involve citizens in religion against their will.

In McCreary County v. American Civil Liberties Union (2005), the Court ruled that the display of the Ten Commandments in two Kentucky courtrooms was unconstitutional.

Questions involving appropriate use of government funds are increasingly subject to the neutrality test, which requires the government to treat religious groups the same as it would any other similarly situated group.

Even though the word neutrality does not appear in the Lemon test, many scholars and judges have interpreted the test’s commands to mean that government must be neutral in matters of religion — that is, laws and government actions should have a secular purpose, should neither advance nor inhibit religion, and should not foster an excessive entanglement with religion. Over the years, various justices have tinkered with and criticized the Lemon test, but the Court has never overruled it. and a testament to the power and resilience of the human spirit. A witness to some of the 20th century’s darkest events and greatest tragedies, he devoted his life to bringing healing by advancing justice, compassion, inclusivity, and fellowship worldwide. A tireless advocate for students of all ages, he sought to foster exchange, understanding, and unity among all people. "

Please remember his comments about "reinforcing our common bonds and lifting up our highest ideals" when we examine the actual Noahide Laws below.

So the only difference is that he now calls it "Education and Sharing Day, U.S.A", but the same Noahide Laws are mentioned as being the core to our "highest ideals". And he is not speaking of our personal ideals, but rather the National ideals that we should uphold.

I believe that it is worth reproducing the actual LAW here, so that we can confirm that what is being extended each year, by every President, and continually agreed to by all of our Presidents of both parties as well as the Congress, does indeed relate to the ancient "Laws of Noah".

PUBLIC LAW 102-14—MAR. 20, 1991
Public Law 102-14
102d Congress Joint Resolution
Mar. 20, 1991
[H.J. Res. 104]
To designate March 26, 1991, as "Education Day, U.S.A.".
Whereas Congress recognizes the historical tradition of ethical values and principles which are the basis of civilized society and upon which our great Nation was founded;
Whereas these ethical values and principles have been the bedrock of society from the dawn of civilization, when they were known as the Seven Noahide Laws;
Whereas without these ethical values and principles the edifice of civilization stands in serious peril of returning to chaos;
Whereas society is profoundly concerned with the recent weakening of these principles that has resulted in crises that beleaguer and threaten the fabric of civilized society;
Whereas the justified preoccupation with these crises must not let the citizens of this Nation lose sight of their responsibility to transmit these historical ethical values from our distinguished past to the generations of the future;
Wherea the Lubavitch movement has fostered and promoted these ethical values and principles throughout the world;
Whereas Rabbi Menachem Mendel Schneerson, leader of the
Lubavitch movement, is universally respected and revered and his eighty-ninth birthday falls on March 26,1991;
Whereas in tribute to this great spiritual leader, "the rebbe", this, his ninetieth year will be seen as one of "education and giving", the year in which we turn to education and charity to return the
world to the moral and ethical values contained in the Seven
Noahide Laws; and Whereas this will be reflected in an international scroll of honor signed by the President of the United States and other heads of state:
Now, therefore, be it
Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the
United States of America in Congress assembled, That March 26,
PUBLIC LAW 102-14—MAR. 20, 1991, 105 STAT. 45 1991,
the start of the ninetieth year of Rabbi Menachem Schneerson, leader of the worldwide Lubavitch movement, is designated as "Education Day, U.S.A.". The President is requested to issue a proclamation calling upon the people of the United States to observe such day with appropriate ceremonies and activities.
Approved March 20, 1991

It certainly must be nice for Congress to mention your birthday when they pass a Law that is then approved by the sitting President.

What are these "bedrocks of society", the Seven Noahid Laws all about?

Noahide Laws, also called Noachian Laws, are a Jewish Talmudic designation for seven biblical laws given to Adam and to Noah before the revelation to Moses on Mt. Sinai and consequently binding on all mankind. Beginning with Genesis 2:16, the Babylonian Talmud listed the first six commandments as prohibitions against idolatry, blasphemy, murder, adultery, and robbery and the positive command to establish courts of justice (with all that this implies). After the Flood a seventh commandment, given to Noah, forbade the eating of flesh cut from a living animal (Genesis 9:4).

These were held to be the basic statutes safeguarding monotheism and guaranteeing proper ethical conduct in society. And apparently anyone who observed these laws as one "assured of a portion in the world to come." Which would mean that those who do not obey these laws would not be assured of a portion of the world to follow.

If you still think that there is actually a difference between what we the people are being fed, by the elected officials from two political parties that are supposedly quite different in nature, or that "this President" or "that one" is any different than all the others, then perhaps you need to read the above one more time. Even the wordage is nearly the same, as if they are simply acknowledging their own agreement to a statement of faith and moral conduct that was produced by those outside of the elected Government of the United States. Because that's exactly what they are doing.

And now on to the famous Noahide Laws which are now part of our own Federal Statutes, as you saw above:

The seven Noachide laws, as traditionally enumerated are:

1. Do Not Deny God
2. Do Not Blaspheme God
3. Do Not Murder
4. Do Not Engage in Incestuous, Adulterous or Homosexual Relationships.
5. Do Not Steal
6. Do Not Eat of a Live Animal
7. Establish Courts/Legal System to Ensure Law Obedience
Sources: Encyclopaedia Judaica. © 2008 The Gale Group. All Rights Reserved

I used the Encyclopaedia Judaica as a source for the laws, but they are nearly word for word identical in all of the reproduced versions.

1. Do Not Deny God. So Atheists, Witches, Sons of Odin, Buddhists, Hindu, Native American spiritualism, etc., are not accepted. And since "God" refers exclusively to Jehovah/Yahweh, and not to any of the other Pagan gods or religious beliefs, those people need not apply either.

2. Do Not Blaspheme God. So if you happen to be one of those that fall into category number 1 above, or those who do, indeed, Deny Jehovah/Yahwey, then you had best keep your thoughts to yourself.

3., 5., 6., are "laws" that most people would obey without having to be ordered to do so by the U.S. Congress and the sitting President.

But oh my! Number 4 is a real stinker! What happened to all of the promises by various Presidents and members of Congress that gender choice and Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender & Intersex choices, and all of the other various lifestyle options that all Americans are now (supposedly) being allowed to either enjoy or ignore as we wish?

Actually, Number 1 is also a real stinker for the tens of millions of Americans who have decided that the God of the Old Testament is not their personal choice.

But, of course, we have Freedom of Religion and a separation of Church and State guaranteed to us by our Constitution, right? Well, yes and no.

Establishment Clause (Separation of Church and State)

The first clause in the Bill of Rights states that "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion."

For approximately the first 150 years of the country’s existence, there was little debate over the meaning of this clause in the Constitution. As the citizenry became more diverse, however, challenges arose to existing laws and practices, and eventually, the Supreme Court was called upon to determine the meaning of the establishment clause.

The most famous use of the metaphor was by Thomas Jefferson in his 1802 letter to the Danbury Baptist Association. In it, Jefferson declared that when the American people adopted the establishment clause they built a "wall of separation between the church and state."

It was not until after World War II that the Supreme Court interpreted the meaning of the establishment clause.

In Lemon v. Kurtzman (1971), the Supreme Court established a three-pronged test for laws dealing with religious establishment. To be constitutional a statute must have "a secular legislative purpose," it must have principal effects that neither advance nor inhibit religion, and it must not foster "an excessive government entanglement with religion."

The Schempp family brought a lawsuit that led to a 1963 ruling by the Supreme Court in Abington School District v. Schempp. It banned bible reading and the recitation of The Lord's Prayer in public schools, saying that it violated the First Amendment's establishment clause requiring separation of church and state.

In County of Allegheny v. American Civil Liberties Union (1989), a group of justices led by Justice Anthony M. Kennedy in his dissent developed a coercion test: the government does not violate the establishment clause unless it provides direct aid to religion in a way that would tend to establish a state church or involve citizens in religion against their will.

In McCreary County v. American Civil Liberties Union (2005), the Court ruled that the display of the Ten Commandments in two Kentucky courtrooms was unconstitutional.

Questions involving appropriate use of government funds are increasingly subject to the neutrality test, which requires the government to treat religious groups the same as it would any other similarly situated group.

Even though the word neutrality does not appear in the Lemon test, many scholars and judges have interpreted the test’s commands to mean that government must be neutral in matters of religion — that is, laws and government actions should have a secular purpose, should neither advance nor inhibit religion, and should not foster an excessive entanglement with religion. Over the years, various justices have tinkered with and criticized the Lemon test, but the Court has never overruled it.

You may have noticed the escape clause that our Congress and Presidents are apparently using in order to pass Laws that seem to be contrary to our own Constitution. Yes, it's the fact that their Federal laws apparently do not involve the appropriation of Government funds, and that they have not (yet) Established the Courts/Legal Systems to Ensure the Laws Obedience. But things will probably become rather bad for many Americans once they do so, since the Noahide Laws do call for punishments for those who disobey. What, punishments? Yes, severe ones.

Even though the Talmud and Maimonides stipulate that a non-Jew who violated the Noachide laws was liable to capital punishment [death], contemporary authorities have expressed the view that this is only the maximal punishment. According to this view, in Noachide law death is the maximal punishment, to be enforced only in exceptional cases. So hopefully yours will be "judged" to be a less than "exceptional" case. Hopefully.

So even though the Law has been passed by the Congress - both the House and Senate, and reaffirmed each year, by every sitting President, in writing, from Carter through Biden, this published Federal Law may never be enforced. It could be though. But then if it is, only exceptional cases will be punished by death. Not yours, surely. Hopefully.

Whenever we are called upon to examine and choose between two flavors, almost like when we were children and we chose between chocolate and vanilla for ice-cream cones, but in this case for whom among the Democrat or Republican candidates we will elect as the leader of the free world, perhaps we should take this report into account. And understand that, no matter what they say, neither party seems to actually have the safety and liberty of its citizens in mind, all the time.

Whoever runs this simulation or experimental realm (which I am absolutely convinced it is, and we are on the brink of breaking through) is apperently merging the servers :cool:

I have never ever heard about the Tambora eruption of 1815 in my timeline. I have studied geology, I had courses on volcanology for several terms, with excellent professors. The guy who did my exam on mineralogy was at his time one of the top 3 volcanologists in Germany with active research projects going on in - you guessed it, Indonesia of all places! We talked about everything, from Vesuvius to Krakatau to even some very obscure eruptions in some godforsdaken places remarkable only because they produced some unusual lavas or minerals in the end. The largest and most devestating eruption in the history of civilized mankind, known to science and the spot identified in this timeline for more than a hundred years, was not even mentioned once. Not in my lectures, not by my professors, not even in my goddamn textbooks!!!

When did the entire Tartaria/mud flood thing start? The oldest references I have found so far are only about a decade old. Anyone of you know older ones?

People must have recognized this stuff ages ago. Nobody apparently did.

I was a major fan of maps since childhood, I used to copy maps from all places around the world, my favourites were Arabia and the Middle East and the Carribean Islands, as well as the kingdom of Prussia in all its iterations.

I even invented my own fantasy realms and drew intricate maps of them since age 9 or 10. I studied any old world map or world atlas I could get my little greedy hands on.

I have never seen Great Tartaria or the Empire of Tartaria in any of those. Maybe it just didn't exist in my timeline?

Maybe everything there fitted together a bit more accurately?

Maybe some (not all) of the things we discuss here are not so much about "intentionally stolen history" but about shifting/merging timelines/parallel universes and the realm we are inhabiting increasingly glitching out?

Maybe TPTB, although they definitely have falsified a lot of history themselves (we are seeing it in front of our eyes on a daily basis how these things are accomplished), they probably have to cope with some aspects of this altered reality as much as everybody else, because they are no longer in control of the entire narrative? I am just referring here to our mundane "elites", not talking about those who may truly control this world in my opinion, and who are certainly not human, and who are most probably largely not benevolent, but look at us like a kid may look at its litlle ant's farm or a gamer at his Sims.

I know this is far out and probably most of you will only shake your head at those thoughts, but I find it more convincing than imagining a bunch of survivors of a global world war/catastrophe having nothing else to do but to compeletely re-write history, faking and forging uncounted millions of books and millions of documents and brainwashing the entire population to come up with something else for what exact reason?

Nobody here has ever provided - as far as I have been reading the threads - a fully fleshed out scenario that provides a believable motive for TPTB to do so.

If you destroy a mortal enemy, you boast about it. If the mortal enemy had superior technology you steal it from him. Then you demonize him and sell the technology as your own "inventions". Maybe you suppress some of the best parts to be excluisve used by the elites and their military forces (like antigravity and zero-point energy tech that the Germans were investigating). That is exactly what has happend to "them ebil Nazis" in the 20th century, after the last worldwide civilization reset commonly known as "World War II".

What should be the motivation to do it differently in the 19th century? Why go to such unimaginable lengths? How was it even technically possible?

So for the time being I stick to the alternative model: we are dealing with merging timelines/universes, and many (not all, but some, including major ones) of the inconsistencies in our history are a result of that, because they do not only affect the present and future, they also affect the past. The "great wall of India" literally popping out of nowhere, at least for me and many others, is a prefect example.

Show less