Election Denier Sam Seder vs Rudy Giuliani

Election Denier Sam Seder vs Rudy Giuliani

Recently, Divorcee & Election Denier Sam Seder was whining about Rudy Giuliani employing “trickery” in the form of telling illegal aliens & legal resident aliens that were not official, legal U.S. citizens that they would be required to show proof of citizenship before voting.

Is the divorcee Sam Seder engaging in election denialism? His party is full of election deniers – such luminaries as Maxine “make a crowd around Trump Cabinet members when you see them” Waters, Reverend “Love Child” Jesse Jackson & his mentally ill son, Barack “It’s clear not every vote was counted in 2004” Obama, Robert “Sheets” Byrd, Barbara Boxer, Hillary “Russia Hacked the Vote” Clinton, the overweight, Looking Like the Crypt Keeper Stephanie Tubbs Jones, “Ferret Face” Jamie Raskin, Sheila Jackson Lee, Cynthia McKinney, John Conyers (who wanted an FBI investigation), Eddie Bernice Johnson, “The Swimmer” Ted Kennedy who drove off a bridge in 1969 resulting in the death of Mary Jo, Elijah Cummings & many others. Uh-oh, the divorcee Sam Seder is perpetuating The Big Lie!

All that has been catalogued here https://rumble.com/v1ou9vw-kari-lake-decimates-the-democrat-media-on-the-big-lie.html

What if Rudy Giuliani said, “I don’t regret that at all, they can call it what they want, Dinkins didn’t win did he?” You may remember “Dingy” Harry Reid saying that after admitting he lied about Mitt Romney’s tax returns on the Senate floor during the 2012 Presidential campaign.

When the divorcee Sam Seder whines about people showing proof of citizenship or an ID, he tips his hand as a vote fraudster. Why do you think Ohio had to go all the way to the SCOTUS for the right to clean their voter rolls? If you fail to vote in 3 federal elections, you are removed from the voter rolls.

The Democrats do not want voter roll maintenance done, this way if they can mail out ballots to every registered voter willy-nilly, they have a pool of inactive voters to utilize for fraud in the event of a close election.

http://freewebs.com/professor_enigma/democrat-vote-fraud Why do you think Democrats like Keith Ellison sponsored legislation that would have allowed anyone to walk into any precinct & cast a ballot sans identification that would not be provisional. Because he wants fraud to be easy.

Why do you think Republicans in Iowa had to go to court to fight for a Photo ID requirement? Because the Democrats want fraud in the event of a close election. Voter fraud in many cases does not have to be widespread, many races would require only one in one-thousand votes to be fictitious to sway an election.

The divorcee Sam Seder has tipped his hand. Iowa has a Photo ID requirement, but if you DO NOT have your ID (and I am working to change that) you have to sign a sworn affidavit that you are who you say you are & if you’re found guilty of false information you can be charged w/ a felony.

I want a Photo ID required or your ballot is provisional & you have the Tuesday after the election to provide the relevant information to your County Auditor.

Is Sam Seder engaging in the Big Lie, is the old man an election denier? Sounds like it, the pot & the kettle have now tendered their resignations.

Here’s some sobering information courtesy of New York City Department of Investigation 2013 Report on the New York City Board of Elections’ Employment Practices, Operations, and Election Administration

[Begin Report Quote] ***[Progressives] who oppose efforts to prevent voter fraud claim that there is no fraud - or at least not any that involves voting in person at the polls. But New York City's watchdog Department of Investigations [see p. 12-24 here] has just provided the latest evidence of how easy it is to commit voter fraud that is almost undetectable. DOI undercover agents showed up at 63 polling places last fall and pretended to be voters who should have been turned away by election officials; the agents assumed the names of individuals who had died or moved out of town, or who were sitting in jail. In 61 instances, or 97 percent of the time, the testers were allowed to vote. Those who did vote cast only a write-in vote for a "John Test" so as to not affect the outcome of any contest. DOI published its findings two weeks ago in a searing 70-page report accusing the city's Board of Elections of incompetence, waste, nepotism, and lax procedures...

You'd think more media outlets would have been interested, because the sloppiness revealed in the DOI report is mind-boggling. Young undercover agents were able to vote using the names of people three times their age, people who in fact were dead. In one example, a 24-year female agent gave the name of someone who had died in 2012 at age 87; the workers at the Manhattan polling site gave her a ballot, no questions asked. Even the two cases where poll workers turned away an investigator raise eyebrows. In the first case, a poll worker on Staten Island walked outside with the undercover investigator who had just been refused a ballot; the "voter" was advised to go to the polling place near where he used to live and "play dumb" in order to vote. In the second case, the investigator was stopped from voting only because the felon whose name he was using was the son of the election official at the polling place.

Here are some highlights, er, lowlights from the DOI report:

DOI also found that the BOE’s Personnel Guidelines do not advise employees about their whistleblower protection rights. The New York City Whistleblower Law protects employees of City agencies, including the BOE, from retaliation for reporting to DOI or to a member of the City Council, the Public Advocate or the Comptroller, each of whom must refer the complaints to DOI, conduct that employees reasonably believe involve corruption, criminal activity, conflicts of interest, gross mismanagement or abuse of authority…

DOI interviewed a former BOE employee who reported that the BOE maintains active voter registrations for people who are not eligible to vote, including deceased individuals, felons, and nonresidents of New York City, and duplicate registrations for some voters. The former employee also stated that people easily could vote as ineligible voters remaining on the rolls because those individuals would appear in the registration books on Election Day and poll workers do not scrutinize the signatures of voters to determine that they that are similar to the pre-printed digitized signatures in the poll book. In light of these statements, DOI sought to test whether ineligible individuals are present on the voter rolls. Thus, using various database searches, DOI identified 176 individuals who at one time were registered voters in New York City: 86 deceased persons, 42 incarcerated felons, and 48 former City residents. During DOI’s Citywide 2013 Election Day investigative operations, DOI sought to determine whether any of them remained in BOE’s registration books and to test whether investigators using the names of those ineligible individuals would be permitted to vote. In sum, DOI investigators found that 63 out of 176 (36%) of the ineligible individuals were still listed as eligible voters in the registration books at poll sites. The majority of those 63 ineligible individuals remained on the rolls nearly two years, and some as long as four years, since a death, felony conviction, or move outside of New York City.

In total, DOI investigators were able to “cast a vote” as 61 of the 63 (97%) ineligible voters who were listed in the registration books – 39 deceased persons, 14 felons, and 8 nonresidents – although no vote was cast for any actual candidate. In lieu of voting for any actual candidate, investigators cast a vote for a fictitious candidate named “John Test.” During the September 2013 primary and October 2013 runoff elections using lever voting machines, investigators signed the registration book as the ineligible individuals, entered the lever voting machine, and cast a vote either by doing a write-in vote for “John Test” or gaining access to the lever machine without doing a write-in vote. During the November 2013 general election using electronic scanner machines, investigators signed the registration books as the ineligible individuals and then cast a vote by doing a write-in vote for “John Test” in the Mayor’s race and scanning the paper ballot through the scanner.

In the 61 out of 63 instances when the ineligible individuals were in the registration books, DOI investigators reported that poll workers did not meaningfully review the signatures provided by investigators for similarity with the pre-printed signatures in the registration books. DOI investigators also found that poll workers did not check the dates of birth listed in the registration books as they were required to do…

In five instances, DOI investigators in their twenties and thirties posed as individuals whose ages as recorded in the registration books, ranged from 82 to 92, and despite the obvious disparity, the investigators were given ballots or access to lever booths without question by the BOE poll workers…

DOI identified 86 deceased individuals who at one time were registered voters. During DOI’s Citywide Election Day investigative operations, DOI investigators went to poll sites where the deceased individuals would have voted based on their previous home addresses. DOI investigators found that 39 of the 86 deceased individuals were listed in the registration books. The majority of the 39 deceased individuals who were listed in the registration books died before January 2012. In all 39 instances, DOI investigators were able to cast a vote as the deceased persons who were listed in the registration books. DOI investigators cast those 39 votes as deceased individuals in all five Boroughs including 11 votes in Manhattan, 7 votes in Brooklyn, 7 votes in Queens, 9 votes in the Bronx, and 5 votes in Staten Island…*** [End Report Quote]

Now that we have that out of the way, I’ve challenged the divorcee Sam Seder numerous times to a debate on why the most violent jurisdictions in America have loads of black on black murder & they tend to vote Democrat. For every cop that shoots a black person, whether it is justified or not, I have a truckload of young black males slain by other young black males. http://freewebs.com/professor_enigma/sam-seder-ilhan-omar-racism3

The divorcee has continued to run away from this & if I challenge him, he is required to answer immediately or he forfeits. I’ve had a number of his autistics (probably offended someone there) tell me to call into his little internet show & joust w/ him on this.

Do they really think I can cover that several hundred plus pages of data I have in a 20-minute phone call w/ the bi-polaroid, when I have a real job & no time to listen to internet shows?

I’ve informed them to tell the divorcee to dedicate tomorrow’s show attempting to refute my data & I will respond in kind. I’ve yet to see this challenge met, apparently Sam has conceded. Why are his voters so violent & so mentally ill.

The most dangerous adversary to a young black male is not the police, not a Confederate Flag-Waving Redneck, not a white militia member – but other young black males & I have the data to prove it.

It’s not trickery, it’s not sorcery, it’s not ambiguous – it’s the real deal & I didn’t set on my laptop during the break of an obscure internet show named after an obscure show on a failed network like Err America.

I collated it myself & nobody “googled some facts” during the break & fed me talking points.

Sam Seder has privately acknowledged this, but he’s going to say it publicly, period.

https://spectator.org/harry-reid-i-lied-about-romney-but-he-didnt-win-did-he/ Harry Reid admits he lied about Mitt Romney’s tax returns & says, “I don’t regret that at all… They can call it whatever they want, Romney didn’t win did he.”

One last thing old man, did Joe Biden ever engage in election trickery where fat women from out of state were stuffing ballots in drop boxes in Georgia at 3AM w/ rubber gloves on? Just wondering. http://freewebs.com/professor_enigma/democrat-election-fraud

I debunked the creep Sam Seder #samseder #majorityreport on so-called “Republican Voter Suppression” https://rumble.com/v24tyd2-divorcee-sam-seder-debunked-on-republican-voter-suppression.html

Sam Seder is afraid to debate James Patrick Holding #samsederwontdebateJPH on The Impossible Faith. https://tektonics.org/lp/nowayjose.php Methinks the divorcee lacks confidence in that religion degree from a diploma mill