The Second Amendment Only Protects Those That Are in Militias...Really?

1 year ago
226

Washington Gun Law President, William Kirk, takes a break from all the current events driving us insane to slow it down for a bit and give you some talking points the next time you are confronted with the argument that "the Second Amendment requires that you be a member of a militia before you have a right to keep and bear arms." Yes, we know this is a completely idiotic argument, which is why it is often used by David Hogg. So today we take the time to teach you about how this argument is dead wrong and what you can do to help educate the other side the next time you encounter this argument. Learn all of this and arm yourself with education today.
_______________________________________________________________________
Contact Washington Gun Law
If you have any questions about this topic, or anything else related to what's left of our Second Amendment Rights, remember you can always contact us at:

www.washingtongunlaw.com or call us directly at 425-765-0487.

Stay safe.
_______________________________________________________________________
Other Resources:

What Exactly is Standing? And What Does It Mean in Gun Control Litigation? https://youtu.be/GtZDmilkEmE

The Firearms Owners Protection Act and Why It Matters Today. https://youtu.be/O8hXaCHhZzw

The Beauty of Bruen and Why It Matters NOW More Than Ever. https://youtu.be/zSyqebFKln0

Yes, We Do Need to Talk About Second Amendment Reparations. https://youtu.be/9QsS3Szh7Bw
_________________________________________________________________
Subscribe to use on Rumble. https://rumble.com/c/WashingtonGunLaw

Subscribe to us on Patreon. www.patreon.com/WashingtonGunLaw

Remember, you can follow us at www.washingtongunlaw.com

Like us on Facebook at www.facebook.com/WashingtonGunLaw

Follow us on Twitter @GunWashington

Loading comments...