How to respond to motion for summary judgment

Enjoyed this video? Join my Locals community for exclusive content at piracylog.locals.com!
9 years ago
43

http://www.vondranlegal.com [over 690 videos and growing]. Subscribe for new videos: https://bit.ly/38vXDzk

TikTok Special - Book a “coaching” call
with Attorney Steve® or Frontline Lisee!!
https://stanwith.me/AttorneySteve

We are a business and intellectual property litigation law firm focusing on copyright and technology law. This is a video from our Litigation Whiteboard® series. Attorney Steve Vondran discussing basic tips regarding how to respond to a motion for summary judgement. If you are handling a litigation case in pro per or in pro se this video might help you level the playing field. Make sure to check your local rules on what is required to go along with your opposition papers, such as statements of undisputed facts, declarations (to be used as evidence), objections to evidence, and anything else that may be required. Also check your "page limits." I just saw an attorney recommended for 5k sanctions for going over the limits.

MSJ case law (9th circuit)

Summary judgment is proper where “the movant shows that there is no genuine dispute as to any
material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.” Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(a). The
moving party has the burden of demonstrating the absence of a genuine issue of material fact for trial. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc., 477 U.S. 242, 256 (1986). “[T]he burden on the moving party may be discharged by ‘showing’ - that is, pointing out to the district court - that there is an absence of evidence to support the nonmoving party’s case.” Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317, 325 (1986); see also Musick v. Burke, 913 F.2d 1390, 1394 (9th Cir. 1990). The moving party must affirmatively show the absence of such evidence in the record, either by deposition testimony, the inadequacy of documentary evidence, or by any other form of admissible evidence. See Celotex, 477 U.S. at 322. The moving party has no burden to negate or disprove matters on which the opponent will have the burden of proof at trial. See id. at 325.

As required on a motion for summary judgment, the facts are construed “in the light most favorable to the party opposing the motion.” Matsushita Elec. Indus. Co. v. Zenith Radio Corp., 475. U.S. 574, 587 (1986). However, the nonmoving party’s allegation that factual disputes persist between the parties will not automatically defeat an otherwise properly supported motion for summary judgment. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(c). A “mere ‘scintilla’ of evidence will be insufficient to defeat a properly. supported motion for summary judgment; instead, the nonmoving party must introduce some ‘significant
probative evidence tending to support the complaint.’” Fazio v. City & County of San Francisco, 125
F.3d 1328, 1331 (9th Cir. 1997) (quoting Anderson, 477 U.S. at 249, 252). Otherwise, summary
judgment shall be entered.

If you are going to court, my tips on handling small claims cases may be helpful to you: https://youtu.be/qTUhBMdddsk
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
🔥 Check out my video on WINNING SMALL CLAIMS LAWSUITS here 🔥 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qTUhB...
👨‍🎓 Learn how to register a trademark WITHOUT A LAWYER here 👨‍🎓
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8gSE5...
✔️ Get some tips on MEDIATION SUCCESS here ✔️
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E32Ks...
✈️ Watch my video on ULTIMATE DEPOSITION TIPS here ✈️
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eyT0C...
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
💡 Join us on Social Media 💡
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/stevevond...
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/attorneysteve/
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/attorneystev...
Twitter: https://twitter.com/SteveVondran
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
🎥 Attorney Steve's Setup 🎥
https://www.vondranlegal.com/my-setup

🕺🏻 Merchandise 🕺🏻
https://www.vondranlegal.com/merchandise

🌟 Avvo Client Reviews 🌟
https://www.avvo.com/attorneys/94104-...

🙌🏻 Support us on Patreon 🙌🏻
https://www.patreon.com/AttorneySteve...
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
🏢 Main Office 🏢
San Francisco Office: https://www.vondranlegal.com/san-fran...

NOTICE: This website is general legal information only and not legal advice. Please do not rely. Some information may not be accurate. We are licensed in CA and AZ. Check your local rules. Parts of our videos may constitute “fair use” under the copyright laws, if you have an issue, please call us at (877) 276-5084. We are not liable for your use or viewing of our videos. Thanks for watching!

© 2020 Attorney Steve Vondran. All rights reserved.

Loading comments...