How the Bump Stock Ruling Undermines All of Operation Reticent Recall

Washington Gun Law President, William Kirk, breaks down the case of Cargill v. Garland, from the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals, which last week ruled that ATF's banning of bump stocks was without lawful authority. However, the real potential of this case is yet to be realized. We have already examined how this ruling could drastically effect ATF's push to regulate firearms with attached stabilizing braces, but today we discuss this case's implications into another area that we are very familiar with, that being ATF's sudden reversal on forced reset triggers and the subsequent Operation Reticent Recall. What does all of this mean to you? Learn more and arm yourself with education.
____________________________________________________________________
Applicable Case(s):

Cargill v. Garland. https://www.ca5.uscourts.gov/opinions/pub/20/20-51016-CV2.pdf
____________________________________________________________________
Applicable Statutes:

26 U.S.C. Sec. 5845. https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/5845
_________________________________________________________________
Other Resources:

The Bump Stock Case that the ATF Should Be Very Worried About. https://youtu.be/xOhre-1Plv8

Check Out our Bullet Point Series. https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLTYlAL5t-3aPwsSwmze-Dw_ev5b7PgNpe
________________________________________________________________________
Subscribe to us on Rumble. https://rumble.com/c/WashingtonGunLaw

Remember, you can follow us at www.washingtongunlaw.com

Like us on Facebook at www.facebook.com/WashingtonGunLaw

Follow us on Twitter @GunWashington