Matt Reardon Leads Out! Says Litigation vs Lafayette County and MS Attorney Generals Office Imminent

It's hard to debate Matt Reardon on these topics, as he has gone out of the way to demonstrate the levels of corruption and coverup that has gone into what he deems as "The Lafayette County Racket". Referencing to a Criminal Racketeering Scheme that stems in Oxford, MS and Lafayette County which has created a massive spiderweb of corruption among state of Mississippi Officials up to tremendous depth within the State of Mississippi Government.Show more

In Referencing (now) captain of the Lafayette County Sheriffs Department, Reardon says:

"His failure to take any steps to properly investigate and identify the claims made on the affidavit to be grotesquely false in nature is sufficient to raise the question of fact as to Bundren's (and several others within the Sheriffs Department) deliberate indifference towards Reardon's due process rights."

Shortly after, Reardon goes on to point out:

"The remedy lies with Congress, whenever it appears that any state has failed to discharge it's constitutional obligation to all citizens”

“Griffin VS Breckinridge the court articulated a clear position that section 1985 paragraph three was a remedial statute that was constitutional on its face in that reached private conspiracies to deprive citizens of civil rights.”

“The court stated that 1985 paragraph three reaches private conspiracies to deprive others of legal rights can of itself cause no doubts of its constitutionality.Thus, according to Griffin, state action is not required in order to bring a suit under Section 1985.”

Finally Reardon goes on to his claims:

“As such plaintiff brings forward his claims against the state of Mississippi and each official named within for their full knowledge of agreed violations, Lafayette County Mississippi and its officials name within for their full knowledge of aggrieved violations, And plaintiff alleges that the defendants conspired upon efforts with certain individual private citizens to hinder the plaintiffs right to vindication through the intentional initiation of frivolous and knowingly per juries, legal proceedings, and further refusing him the equal protection to the laws guaranteed under the 14th amendment and turn the state of Mississippi through denying the plaintiff the equal protections of not only its own laws laid out, but federal constitutional rights as well have continued to deny plaintiffs absolute right to redress and vindication.

Plaintiff alleges that there exists multiple examples of this now and that evidence would demonstrate a continued repetitive effort.The State of Mississippi and in particular Lafayette county and Lafayette County Sheriff's Department have demonstrated an undeniable pattern of the same occurrences and conduct leading directly to an ultimate end goal of defendants absconding with their prior immoral, unlawful and unconstitutional acts further intending to seek indemnification for intentional liabilities by inflicting fear and pressure into the plaintiff so that he caves and gives in.

It's the continuation of the latter that plaintiff alleges constitutes violations under the RICO act. And as such plaintiff alleges Rico Act violations in his complaint.”

After that Reardon reads through the Mississippi Constitution and it’s bill of rights that apply under Section 3 of the Mississippi Constitution that double in violation of the Federal Constitution.

Reardon now claims the Jurisdiction is not proper due to a massive statewide conflict of interest and moves to bring these actions in Federal Court against all Officials whom was made aware of the mounting situation yet refused to act through the duties of their respective offices