stkirsch

I asked on my Substack if anyone would debate me on whether the virus exists. Only 3 people registered. I emailed all three asking for who is ready to define the positions now in a 1:1 call. Only Gunnels replied; Marius replied he wasn’t comfortable with a 1:1 call. So I let Gunnels control the platform so I couldn’t be accused of any trickery, and we talked for over 90 minutes so I could hear his arguments and so I could ask questions. The transcript is posted here: http://www.skirsch.com/covid/GunnelsDebate.pdf Patrick's argument is that if you cannot prove it to his specifications (based on outdated Koch's postulates which he believes are necessary to establish you have a virus), then the virus doesn't exist. Patrick believes that the null hypothesis is that viruses do not exist. Therefore, if you want to disprove that, you must show (to his specifications) that a virus DOES exist. Sorry, but that's NOT how science works. Science would say there are two hypotheses: the null hypothesis (no virus) and the “virus” hypothesis. We’ll call them hypothesis A and B. What scientists do is then collect data. They then look at the data and make a decision: is this observation consistent with A, B, both, or neither. There have been millions of observations by scientists over the past 100 years and these observations as far as I know are all consistent with B. This is why virtually all scientists believe viruses exist. Now Stefan Lanka comes along and says (I’m paraphrasing here), “whoops. You never PROVED you can isolate a virus! Therefore, it is more likely that they don’t exist because if a virus existed someone should have “isolated it” based on MY definition of isolation, not yours. So we have to accept there is no virus or virology until you meet a set of criteria that I define that are based on the outdated Koch’s postulates and my interpretation of them.” Lanka offers anyone 100,000 euros if they can prove in a SINGLE paper that the measles virus exists. This is done by David Bardens using 6 papers. Lanka never uses the single paper argument in the lower court and loses in court based on expert testimony about whether the offer was satisfied. On appeal, Lanka points out the single paper requirement, and the judgement is overturned as a matter of law, not science since higher courts never rule on the evidence. Requiring proof in a SINGLE paper is not how science works. Now they want to use similar methods to prove SARS-CoV-2 doesn’t exist, even though we can see it. I contacted Li Meng Yan. She wrote: “The SARS-CoV-2 in the video was isolated and cultivated by my husband Ranawaka A P M Perera in the same WHO H5 Reference Lab with me at the University of Hong Kong in Jan 2020. It was the first time to isolate SARS-CoV-2 out of mainland China. His name was not mentioned in the video (as “staff” at the end of the attached picture). My bosses are JS Malik Peiris and L M Poon. Btw, JS Malik Peiris is a core scientist in CCP’s unrestricted bioweapon program. He is a secret communist from Sri Lanka. “ Here is the video. You can see the virus in it: https://youtu.be/aOZvf5NOFHs It’s easy to convince me I’m wrong. Patrick needs to show me that the observed data is a better fit to his hypothesis than mine. That's science. He completely failed to do that. I gave him a very simple example so he could show his hypothesis could better explain the series of events observed with my recent COVID infection than my hypothesis. He couldn’t show that. He was mystified how a series of people could be infected and show a positive antigen test. He had NO EXPLANATION. Science is about showing YOUR explanation BETTER fits the observed data than THEIR explanation. We are so far apart, this discussion isn't worth going forward. This is a complete waste of time. If anything, Patrick made me more confident that virology is legit and SARS-CoV-2 is a real virus. Nobody who said Patrick won is able to show the observations are better explained by the null hypothesis. When I show people that the vaccine is dangerous, I assemble hundreds of pieces of data that simply cannot be explained if the vaccine is safe. All those datapoints are consistent with an unsafe vaccine. So I’m able to do both with the vaccines. I show the data cannot be explained by the “safe and effective” hypothesis and can easily be explained by the “not safe” hypothesis. Patrick assembled 0 pieces of observed data consistent with his hypothesis. He just said that because an experiment he specifies hasn’t been done to his satisfaction, that’s all it takes. So Li Meng Yan’s husband’s work is tossed out because Patrick doesn’t believe it. You are welcome to disagree and I will not suppress your views. We are all entitled to our opinions and how we choose to spend our time. As for me, I'm out. If you want to comment, please refrain from ad hominem attacks, who won the “debate”, etc. Please focus on how scientists decide which hypothesis better fits observed data. If you think the virus doesn’t exist, show how that hypothesis is more LIKELY to explain the observations. For example, if there is no SARS-CoV-2, then it should be impossible to create an antigen test from the genome reference RNA and then have these tests consistently go positive when people become sick. If there is no virus, how are these tests going positive when you get sick and go negative when you get well? Nobody will explain that. Finally, Patrick admitted in the video that bacteriophages exist and have been isolated. But bacteriophages are viruses. EVERY virologist and molecular biologists say that. But Patrick says no, bacteriophages are not viruses because nobody has ever seen them reproduce. I asked him how they replicate then. At that point, he resorted to ad hominem attacks and told me to stop emailing him. I guess that is how science works. When the questions start getting uncomfortable, you dive into ad hominem attacks and refuse to answer a simple question. Got it. If anyone wants to answer how bacteriophages can replicate in the comments, I’m all ears. Patrick says that bacteriophages are NOT replication-competent because it has not been observed. OK, so how come there are so many of them that they can be isolated in a centrifuge? Who is making copies of them? Has that process been observed? In what paper? Are they any virologists or molecular biologists agreeing with Patrick that bacteriophages are NOT a virus? You are welcome to believe what you want. I wasn’t convinced. The full article is here: https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/is-there-a-virus-round-1

This video, produced by the CDC, describes in more detail the rigorous science that was used to justify the approval of the COVID vaccine for young kids. It contains important safety information for parents worldwide to be aware of.

WARNING: LOT OF AUDIO DROP OUT. SKIP OVER IT USING THE CURSOR KEYS. Next time I'll use zoom for these recordings. I am using Riverside.fm which works with one guest, but it is an epic fail for 7 guests. This is the first time I tried it and this is the best I can get out of it. The sound is also out of sync in places. I was able to get 7 nurses on camera to talk about the rate of vaccine injury among their peers. The rate of vaccine injuries among their peers averaged around 20%. This is remarkable because after this episode was recorded, we did a poll of Americans and found a rate of vaccine injury well over 10%. But even if our poll is "off" by a factor of 10X, the rate of injury here is unprecedented. Madhulika provided the following: Bypass the audio FAILS. Times to listen (hopefully accurate): 00:00 to 8:00 minutes. Steve & first nurse talked. 12:48 to 17:55 minutes. Kathleen (retired, but writes books about vaccines for nurses.. daughter's AF, SIDS SADS mentioned). 17:55 to 27:40 Kerry..nurse of 12 years ( Kerry is jab injured...the common way many nurses/doctors wake up. POTS....more injuries) 27:40 to 38:55 Tina (patchy bad audio...improves a bit...with a hum for the dedicated listener worth it!!). Tina is jab injured...thus now much more awake to jab or vaccine injury. This is how it works. I've been looking at vaccine injury for 10 years. 38:55 to 44:50 Courtney unjabbed...nurse in Florida. (audio hum) Talks about injuries...Bell's palsy. Mentioned hard core doctors pro-jab. AUDIO FAIL Jacky interview fail. 1:04:25 to 1:06:00 Steve asks for final comments. Kim talks . AUDIO FAIL with Jackie. 1:08:40 to Courtney and then Tina. Kathleen speaks too (@1:10:00). Courtney (@1:12:40) speaks to being heartbroken over medical corruption. Won't cite various papers. Tina (@1:14:10), Kathleen (@1:15:20), Steve to all nurses "Have you redpilled a doctor?" (@1:18:00) At 1:20:45 into the video STEVE NAILS IT ABOUT REDPILLING DOCTORS. "WHAT IT TAKES IS A DEATH IN THEIR FAMILY". This is the basic general truth (for most doctors) IF THEY EVEN SEE IT. Dr.Been (on YT & Rumble, FLCCC) for example has a vaccine injury to a family member. I've been looking at vaccine injury for 10 years. Nothing much changes.

Brook Jackson is the Pfizer whistleblower. Her attorney, Robert Barnes, says that Brook Jackson exposed the fact that the Pfizer clinical trial was riddled with errors and fraudulent and false certifications to the US government. Pfizer's defense presented in court is that the FDA knew about the fraud and was in on it, therefore, there isn't any fraud. In short, he basically said that in a court proceeding Pfizer admitted things were fraudulent. The FDA needs to investigate this admission by Pfizer of fraud, don't you think?

I interview Dr. Toby Rogers and get his take on the VRBPAC meeting today which unanimously approved the Moderna EUA vaccine for 6 to 17 year olds. Suffice it to say, Toby was not impressed at all with the panel. These vaccines should not have been approved. There weren't ANY kids in the trials that benefited from the drug, but it was unanimously approved! Note: The sound isn't synced and is distorted. This seems to be a big problem with using Riverside.fm. If they don't resolve this soon, I'll cancel.

I had the honor to interview Andrew Wakefield and hear his side of the story, the side that the mainstream media won't let you hear. The questions I asked are documented in my Substack: https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/im-interviewing-andrew-wakefield Key takeaways: You'll be WAY healthier if you AVOID *ALL* vaccines, vaccines do cause autism, the CDC, FDA, NIH and drug companies are adept at silencing critics. It's a rigged system and you pay the price.

This video highlights my two most recent surveys done on 5/22/22. One survey shows 55% of people had their cancer get dramatically worse after the vaccine. In no cases did it get better. The other survey showed a dramatic increase in miscarriage rates since the vaccines rolled out. It also showed that the vaccines are killing at least as many people as COVID is. Instead of reducing deaths, we're doubling deaths with the vaccines, killing over an estimated 700,000 Americans. For more details, see https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/eight-different-surveys-all-show

This is the most important video I've ever done. It is a quick 17 minute summary of the highlights of 8 different surveys which all show that the COVID vaccines are dangerous and should be immediately halted. The beauty of this work is that anyone can replicate these surveys and they cannot be explained away by your doctor or anyone else. If you believe your own eyes, you'll find this eye opening. But if you trust your doctor more than the evidence in plain sight, watching this video will be a complete waste of your time. For details, see my substack article: https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/eight-different-surveys-all-show?s=w Please spread the word.

How will they spin this one? Five completely different surveys show the COVID vaccines aren't safe and effective, not even close. For example, the under 18 death survey since 2020 showed 15 deaths caused by the vaccine and 0 deaths caused by COVID. There were 26 months in the COVID group and 17 months in the vaccine group so we'd expect to see 1.5X more deaths in the COVID group if both COVID and the vaccine were equally deadly. 0 COVID deaths vs. 15 vaccine deaths is stunning. It shows an incredibly deadly vaccine that should have NEVER been used on kids. That the CDC outside committee members just approved the booster vaccines for 5 to 11 saying they SHOULD be used (instead of MAY be used) is appalling because I told them just minutes before they voted that the survey data showed they were harming kids. They did not care. They did not request my data. They ignored it. They have NO data showing I am wrong. Only one person on the committee voted NO, one abstained, the rest voted to approve. Is there any public health official in the US that can show how we got this wrong? Will any public health official or mainstream media do their own survey and publish the "correct" results? Will any "fact checker" organization get the original data from us and validate the results? Surely the fact checkers would want to show we are making this up, right? I am happy to supply the full data under NDA (to protect privacy of the respondents) so they can either validate the results or show how they are wrong. The "catch" is that if they do the work, they MUST agree to publish the results, good or bad. Now, do you think any of them will fact check this under those conditions? Absolutely not. I guarantee it. DO NOT BELIEVE ME. DO NOT BELIEVE THE GOVERNMENT. PLEASE do YOUR OWN surveys and you'll be ASTONISHED that you have been lied to. If there is any public health official, including those from the FDA, NIH, or CDC who wants the data, the same agreement holds: I'll give you the full data, you agree to publish what you found. This is why they won't request the data. BECAUSE THEY KNOW. Was the survey biased? "They" would argue it is because nearly all the respondents think the vaccines are unsafe. But we know that my respondents see the world as is really is, so there is no actual bias if we are looking at "reality." However, even if we survey those who are pro-vaccine, I predict the numbers will be just as devastating. We have launched the surveys to do just that. At that point, there will no place for them to hide. In the meantime, I am happy to cooperate with any fact checkers or government agencies who want to validate my data. You can contact me at stevekirsch-request at protonmail.com to request the data. For more details, see my substack article: https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/eight-different-surveys-all-show?s=w

He almost died after landing an American Airlines plane. He's now disabled, pissed, and speaking out about how they forced him to take the vaccine that ended his career. Other pilots are flying injured just like he is, putting your life at risk.

My comments on the Jikkyleaks thread commenting on the Pfizer documents that appear to show clinical trial fraud. It looks like fraud, but there is more to the story suggesting it could be possible. Dr. Polack is the Scientific Director of the INFANT Foundation in Buenos Aires which coordinates a network of 26 hospitals in Argentina. So if all 26 hospitals participated fully then that's 57 patients per week per hospital which is possible if the sites have done this before and have a coordination framework for getting all 26 sites up and running at the same time. Also, site 4444 is the same site as 1231. They used 4444 for the second enrollment session at that site. I was unaware of these two pieces of information at the time I made the video. It still seems unlikely. However, even this was totally on the level (which it might be), Brook Jackson documented clinical trial frauds that should also invalidate the liability protection.

Robert Jackson has been a rheumatologist for 35 years. He's never seen a vaccine like this one. In this video he compares the COVID vaccines safety to other vaccines. He has 6,000 patients and typically sees hardly any vaccine side effect. With the COVID vaccines, 40% report problems and for 5% of them, it's long lasting. Also, about 5% develop a new condition that makes them susceptible to clotting. He notes that their observations about the increased rates of side effects have been confirmed in the literature. He also talked about treating COVID using a 30 minute infusion of mesenchymal stem cell derived exosomes. This is available for use by anyone today.

A new paper is out linking the COVID vaccines and hepatitis (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168827822002343). Marc believes that this is not directly due to the spike protein, but happens indirectly. After injection, the lipid nanoparticles (LNP) in the vaccines carry the mRNA instructions to your cells causing them to express spike protein (known as "transfection"). These transfected cells are all over your body and are not limited to the injection site. The T-cells in the immune system then attack these cells (since they are expressing a foreign protein) causing the destruction of (formerly) healthy tissue. If the T-cell attacks happens to cells in the liver, you get hepatitis. If it happens in cells near your heart, you get myocarditis. If it happens in the cells protecting the blood-brain barrier and in your brain, the barrier can be damaged leading to prion disease, Alzheimer's, dementia, autism, stroke, etc. More details in this 47 minute video.

Snow nearly died from the vaccine. Here's his story as told by Josh Yoder including how they know it was the vaccine. American Airlines never called Snow in the hospital even though it was their fault he took the vaccine and almost died. Yoder estimates that 30% of the pilots may need to be disqualified due to heart conditions caused by the vaccine. The airlines are NOT doing the screenings required to assess pilot health and passenger safety because doing those screenings would reveal how unsafe the vaccines are. Therefore, I predict they will simply pretend this never happened. If a plane goes down, it's OK because the insurance companies will pay and they will pretend it was just an accident. So everyone will look the other way while these incidents continue. I predict the mainstream press won't touch the story or interview Snow. But I will :)

In 60 seconds, you'll see something only found in vaccinated people. This is what happens to some people after getting vaccinated. Is there any wonder we are seeing so many vaccine injuries and death? This is taken from an artery in a man who died after COVID vaccination. Richard is seeing these clots now in 83% of the 35 cases that he did this month. I offered to show all my videos to the CDC and FDA, but I seriously doubt they will ever get back to me. They just don't want to have to deal with evidence like this. See https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/i-offered-to-share-embalmer-videos

James Lyons-Weiler did a 2 hour interview with Yale Professor Jason Abaluck. Mike helps us interpret that discussion. What you'll learn from the interview is that the Bangladesh mask study proved NOTHING. If there is an effect, it was too small to measure.

I offer to donate $100,000 to Mayor Adams' favorite charity if he and his medical experts will engage me and 5 of my friends in a 3 hour debate on the NYC COVID pandemic policies on mutually agreeable debate terms. I am also extending this offer to the Mayors of the 10 largest cities in the US. The Mayor and his medical experts can bring as many people as they want to their side of the debate. They'll need all the help they can get. Note that Mayor Adams need not win the debate. The $100K is just for showing up at the debate table. Both sides will have equal amount of talk time. Thanks to FDNY firefighter Sophy Medina for the suggestion to do this and filming the challenge. See this story for more on Sophy: https://nypost.com/2022/03/24/unvaxxed-new-yorkers-blast-adams-exemptions-for-athletes/

Amanda Damian is vaccine injured. She is also one of the key people organizing the Defeat the Mandates rally in Los Angeles (April 10, 2022). Amanda had a seizure shortly after midnight on April 8. She was taken by ambulance to Adventist Health Glendale Hospital. The quality of care she received at the hospital is apalling. She has a nurse (Angela Wulbrecht who was formerly a trauma nurse at UCSF) travelling with her that saw the whole thing. They wouldn't let her in the ambulance, and when Amanda was admitted, the hospital refused to let the nurse in the room. The attending nurse was told to insert an IV into Amanda even though she already had a PICC line installed which was plainly visible and noted to the paramedics. When Amanda called her doctor to protest and her doctor agreed this was not appropriate, the attending doctor told Amanda's doctor "this is no longer a productive conversation" and returned the phone to Amanda. Amanda then requested to be released against medical advice (AMA) and returned to the hotel. The hospital plans to bill her for her visit there even though they never touched her. This is the type of compassionate care delivered by Adventist Health Glendale Hospital. I am baffled how these decisions were in the best interest of the patient. In this video, Amanda, then Angela, explain what happened so you can hear it directly from them.

You can't make this stuff up. NIAID Director Anthony Fauci says if you got flu, there is no need for a flu vaccine. Facebook and their independent fact-checker have labelled this false information. In other words, Facebook is telling everyone that Fauci spreads misinformation. Note: the fact check can't be referring to the post because the post just asks the question, "How has no one in the media found this Anthony Fauci clip sooner?"

Dr. Cadegiani just published his research paper (moments after this interview) that shows that there is no rational explanation for the corruption of clinical trial results other than deliberate sabotage by Pfizer to ensure that there are no viable competitors to Pfizer's products. At the very end, Dr. Cadegiani reveals an astonishing statistic on the number of vaccine injured in his experience: 85%. His paper is here: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/359246023_Pfizergate_20_-_Active_actions_against_competitive_anti-_COVID_drugs_The_case_of_the_anti-androgens

He thinks they are due to the vaccine. He couldn't think of any other cause. He only started hearing lots of reports of this in Jan 2022. So it couldn't be caused by COVID. So if it wasn't the vaccine (booster dose specifically), what was it?

I walk you through filling out this misinformation report created by the US government so you can let them know how you have been misled by false information promulgated by government agencies, doctors, the mainstream medical community, mainstream media, public health officials, state government officials, and members of Congress. Even if you don't fill out the form, you'll want to watch this video. You'll see the surprise at about 30 seconds into the video. After you watch the video, compare the text to the webpage at: https://www.hhs.gov/surgeongeneral/health-misinformation-rfi/index.html and see if there are any differences in the second paragraph. For more info, see the full article at https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/your-opportunity-to-report-covid?s=w

If you are serious about protecting Grandma from getting COVID-19, this is what you'd want. Of course, the CDC would never tell you this, which is why I made this video. All the gear is from Mira Safety. The CM-6M Tactical Gas Mask costs $240, the P-3 virus filters are $150, and the MB-90 Powered Air Purifying Respirator (PAPR) unit is $400. It's super easy to breathe in this, no resistance at all. The headgear won't fog up. The battery lasts 12 hours. The fact is that N95 masks, surgical masks, and cloth masks aren't going to do anything to protect Grandma from getting COVID. And we all know that the vaccine won't protect her either. So this is pretty much the best way to ensure Grandma doesn't get COVID. This is what the professionals wear.

This is the information a fact checker (in this case Gabrielle Settles from PolitiFact) gets when they call me. Guess how much of this ends up in the fact check? I think none of it. We'll find out soon. She called me on my cell phone. You get to listen in on what was said. Both parties consented to the recording. At no time did she ask about the Bradford-Hill causality criteria. I told her I validated the VAERS data was legit 12 different ways that did not use VAERS. Did she ever ask for any of the 12 different ways. Nope. She had no interest. This is fact checking?!?! For what happened next, you'll really want to read this article: https://kirschsubstack.com/p/the-great-debate-politifact-vs-the

In this wide ranging interview, I talk with Dr. Byram Bridle about whether the truth will ever come out and how this will end. Topics covered: 1. How did the debate challenging the Canadian health officials go? 2. Does anyone want to debate you? 3. What does the science say about the vaccines? 4. Are these reports about blood impacts after vaccination true? What did you own studies find? 5. What's really going on in Canada? How many people support the truckers? Is the mainstream media telling people what is really happening? 6. Can you get arrested and put in jail? Could I? 7. How is this going to end?