Ryan Cole is the only pathologist in the US willing to test for the vaccine "fingerprints"
If you know someone who died post-vaccine and want to find out whether the person died from the vaccine, you'll want to send the autopsy tissue samples to Dr. Cole to be examined. He's likely the only pathologist in the US willing to do this work.
116K
views
221
comments
Post vax: Miscarriage rates up 50%, Fertility down 50%.
Watch the video of Kimberly Biss, MD (OB/Gyn) .
This is a disaster. This is why the CDC never published the final results on their NEJM study of the COVID vaccines and reproductive health.
Please re-post. Thanks!
32.7K
views
114
comments
Michael Turner MD tells a troubling story of doctor intimidation
Dr. Turner's friend, a pediatrician, was told by his hospital, "If you tell anyone the vaccine is not safe, you will be fired for spreading misinformation"
If that pediatrician was in California, in addition to being fired, he'd have his license to practice medicine taken away.
Is it any wonder that all the doctors are telling patients that the vaccines are safe and effective?
Have you ever wondered, if the vaccines are as safe as they claim, why do they need intimidation tactics *ONLY* for *THIS* vaccine?
27.4K
views
146
comments
Clinical psychologist Cindy Eaton says medical censorship is bad and good
I interviewed Cindy Eaton who is a clinical psychologist. The interview was in downtown Los Altos. I asked her what she thought of AB2098. She had not heard of the bill, so I described that it prohibited doctors from talking to their patients only for COVID freely; they had to restrict their speech to the "medical consensus." She thought this was a bad idea.
15 minutes later she came back and DEMANDED I delete her interview. I asked her why. She said I misled her and mischaracterized the bill. She said after the interview that she read the NY Times article on AB2098 which said it was a bill that regulated COVID-19 MISINFORMATION bill.
She's said she's in FAVOR of censoring COVID misinformation so she wanted to take back what she said.
She demanded I delete the video immediately or else she would tell everyone not to talk to me. After all, that's what respectable medical professionals do.
Then she stood around telling everyone not to talk to me.
When that wasn't enough to get me to delete the video, she called the cops. Two officers arrived and agreed she had no standing.
If she had been nice about it and made a polite request I would have not used the video. But by calling the cops on me and standing around shooing people away telling people I misrepresented the bill (which you can see that I did not), she went over the line.
Once you agree to an interview, you can't un-ring the bell.
For example, I'd imagine the people who participated in the Jan 6 event at the White House probably regret what they did and would like CNN and others to delete their footage of the event. Sorry, it doesn't work that way.
But what was fascinating about this incident is when censorship is described as prohibiting speech which doesn't agree with the mainstream medical consensus, Cindy thinks that is bad.
But when the NY Times characterizes it as "medical misinformation" suddenly Cindy thinks censorship is good and absolutely the right thing to do!
The bill itself defines misinformation as disagreeing with the medical consensus: " “Misinformation” means false information that is contradicted by contemporary scientific consensus contrary to the standard of care."
So nothing changed other than using the term misinformation. Once it is misinformation, then censorship goes from being bad to good.
I asked Cindy about the war on fat where all the doctors thought fat was bad. If a doctor told a diabetic patient to reduce carbs and increase fats, he would have his license to practice medicine taken away. Cindy had no comment.
Also, one doctor from Stanford Hospital walked by but he refused to comment on the bill. I got the sense he wanted to keep his job. So doctors don't feel safe talking about a bill that censors them.
Are you surprised?
See the full article on my substack:
https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/clinical-psychologist-cindy-eaton
15.6K
views
173
comments
I notified Dr. John Su that the death safety signal was triggered for the COVID vaccine
I just wanted to make absolutely sure he was notified that the VAERS numbers for death were triggered and we haven't heard anything about that from the CDC. They certainly NEVER showed up in the FOIA request on safety monitoring. That's REALLY odd. It's almost like they didn't want anyone to know.
I left my number in case he had any questions.
13.6K
views
100
comments
Four people on the street in downtown Los Altos talk about the CDC and v-safe
No anti-vaxxers in these interviews!
Hear first hand what people who took the vaccine think about the CDC withholding the v-safe data from the American public for two years so that nobody would know how unsafe the vaccines are.
Do you think they were outraged at the CDC withholding safety data? Or did they shrug their shoulders?
The funniest part is at the very end where Rich's wife tries to get him to leave at 36:30 when I mention the word "lawsuits."
16.1K
views
327
comments
Pediatrician Michelle Perro speaks out against the COVID vaccines
Michelle Perro of the very few pediatricians who is not afraid to speak the truth about the COVID vaccines and her peers.
I originally planned this to last just 30 minutes, but we went on for 90 minutes covering a wide range of topics including censorship of doctors, clinical practice guidelines, why her peers are retiring, MIS-C rates in children, whether she has been able to red-pill anyone (she talked to 30 of her peers and redpilled 0), are GMO foods safe, how can doctors be looking the other way while we give our kids unsafe drugs, and more.
25.1K
views
189
comments
I finally found a Stanford undergrad who isn't buying the narrative
I went to Stanford University today to see if I could find anyone who wasn't buying the narrative hook, line, and sinker. It only took me 2 hours before I talked to Aleko Brice, a Stanford undergrad. He got one J&J shot because he felt he needed it to travel, but he filed for a religious exemption so he avoided getting the required booster. Smart move.
I asked for his opinion on Stanford's vaccine policy and he thinks even if the benefits outweigh the risk, it should still be a personal choice and not mandated. He also said there are a lot of kids at Stanford who are remaining silent who feel the same way.
21.4K
views
195
comments
Paul Marik speaks about the silencing of doctors who want to speak out about the COVID vaccines
My friends who believe the vaccine are safe have told me they would reconsider their position if any of their doctors came out against the vaccine.
I told them that doctors are afraid to speak out because they will lose their ability to practice medicine if they challenge the mainstream narrative.
They find that too hard to believe.
So I wanted to interview a doctor who is very highly respected and who is not an “anti-vaxxer” to explain it to them.
The medical community had to fabricate patients, not reveal their names to Dr. Marik, in order to strip him of his ability to practice medicine.
In this video, Paul describes the methods used to silence doctors who choose to speak out.
This is why few doctors challenge the status quo. That's wrong. That's why they created tenure in universities to prevent abuses like this.
292K
views
380
comments
Interview with Nathan Jones, CEO of Xlear
Can a nasal spray with water and sugar prevent bacterial and viral infections? The scientific studies say yes.
12.1K
views
88
comments
Interview with Tina Peters, star of Selection Code
Tina is an honest election official in Colorado. She discovered discrepancies with vote totals being manipulated by the manufacturer. When she blew the whistle, the state officials went after her, instead of the people who tampered with the vote totals. You can't make this stuff up. Here's what happened since the movie was released.
18K
views
216
comments
ACIP Chair Grace Lee called the cops on me
I had one question for her: "Do you want to see the safety data from the Israeli Ministry of Health?"
She refused to acknowledge my emails and text messages.
Since she lives 10 minutes from me, I knocked on her door hoping for a friendly conversation. Instead of that, she chose to call the cops on me.
The officer handed her the note so now I finally have proof of delivery. She never called which means, "I got your message but I don't want to see the safety data. Thanks for asking."
I gave it my best shot. I did everything humanly possible to get her attention.
Note: I used the tracking function in Davinci Resolve to blur my phone number on the note. Super cool.
40.9K
views
296
comments
My 90 second comment to the WHO
They asked for video submissions “Based on your experience with the COVID-19 pandemic, what do you believe should be addressed at the international level to better protect against future pandemics?”.
This was my submission.
30.4K
views
184
comments
My call with Bonita Johnson of the CDC putting them on notice
Bonita works with Tom Shimabukuro who is one of the top vaccine safety people at the CDC. Since Tom never responds, I called Bonita who works with him. Now we have PROOF that the message was delivered.
What will they do now?
18.1K
views
109
comments
If you are killed by the vaccine, NOBODY will blame the vaccine
Both Deb Conrad and Gina Doane have been featured on Highwire.
I spent 90 minutes talking to both of them about how hospitals and the CDC treat the people who have been killed by the vaccine.
The hospital holds all the cards and even when this was one of the most obvious vaccine deaths I've ever heard about, no doctor at the hospital nor the CDC would recognize this as a vaccine death. They even omitted mentioning he was vaccinated on his death certificate.
When it comes to the vaccines, they can DO NO HARM.
This segment names the people who were responsible for this cover-up.
This death, which was early in the vaccination campaign, should have been acknowledged by the CDC as being caused by the vaccine. But you can't get anyone on camera at the CDC or the hospital to talk to about it.
There is something very serious broken when such an obvious vaccine death is covered up like this.
See the tribute to Gina's father here:
https://thehighwire.com/videos/he-would-be-alive-right-now-if-he-had-not-gotten-the-vaccine/
I interrupt my guests many times in this video because I'm so incredulous that this can be happening.
MANY PEOPLE FIND THIS OBJECTIONABLE. I KNOW THIS. I APOLOGIZE.
Please FOCUS YOUR COMMENTS ON THE CONTENT AND LESSONS, not the style of the interview.
Your comments will be more valuable to others who read them than "You interrupped your guests too much" which we already know.
There is critically important content in the video.
20.2K
views
94
comments
Ryan Cole: tests to identify a person killed by the COVID vaccine
I discuss a variety of topics with Ryan Cole related to his expertise as a pathologist who specializes in COVID injuries and death.
The most shocking thing revealed in this video is that the CDC could easily determine how many people have likely been killed by the vaccine, but they are not interested in instructing the medical examiners in how to look for vaccine-related deaths both during the exam and after the exam.
We have 14,000 deaths that should be investigated and the government should compensate those victims. It's a simple test. They won't do it.
Why isn't the CDC having 100 cases stained as specified by Dr. Cole? Then we can find out for sure if none of these deaths was vaccine related or all of them. Doesn't the CDC want to know?
They are not interested in contacting Dr. Cole for details.
Their mission is to vaccinate people and to look the other way when it comes to safety.
We talk about vaccine injury, what causes it, how to treat it, and why doctors cannot see it. All their tests come up negative. Dr. Cole explains why.
135K
views
282
comments
Interview with Wayne Root about his wedding anecdote
Since the wedding 8 months ago
100 vaxxed: 26 severe injuries; 7 deaths
100 unvaxxed: 0 injuries; 0 deaths
Confirmed in my survey of 600 readers and other anecdotes.
This is how bad the vaccines are.
For more info, see: https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/you-are-25x-more-likely-to-be-injured
15.4K
views
131
comments
YouTube censored my video putting the CDC on notice they are violating the constitution
They censored it for "Medical misinformation" because I offered to discuss misinformation spreader claims like how many people have died from the COVID vaccines. The CDC says nobody has died so I'm sure that's what triggered it.
Basically, to keep everyone safe, YouTube will censor any information that contradicts what the CDC or WHO said. But either agency can contract the other agency, because that is safe.
Here is the YouTube censored video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dNsUCpnwzYg
Here is the video they don't want you to see: https://rumble.com/v1ebl1x-my-voicemail-for-carol-crawford-of-the-cdc-on-how-to-stop-covid-misinformat.html
2.28K
views
33
comments
My voicemail for Carol Crawford of the CDC on how to stop COVID misinformation
I wanted to make a public record that I reached out to the CDC suggesting how to put a stop to the spread of COVID misinformation. This 10 minute video documents my efforts.
I'm going to post this to YouTube as well to see how many seconds it lasts before they censor it.
The YouTube version is here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dNsUCpnwzYg
It was censored within minutes.
14.7K
views
129
comments
Nextdoor survey: More people died from the vaccine than the virus
Whoops! The signal is so strong that even in the "blue pilled" Nextdoor community, the vaccine kills more people than the virus!
The results are so troubling that a Stanford Professor told me to take this offline! Apparently, information transparency is a bad word in 2022.
This observation was confirmed using FIVE DIFFERENT polling firms.
See https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/new-zogby-poll-10-of-americans-regret for full details.
3.47K
views
36
comments
A public health official in America who consented to an interview!!
I interview Troy Ross who is the Public Health officer of Lander County, Nevada. He’s the only public health official in the world who would agree to an on-camera interview (so far).
Know why? He agrees with me that the vaccines are deadly, masks don’t, work and pretty much everything else.
I thought it would be important to document that there is at least one public health official in America who knows the truth.
That’s a good sign.
Maybe we can find a second someday.
The echo was my fault for not selecting echo cancellation. Apologies.
7.53K
views
66
comments
Jeff Diamond had his fingers amputated after he got the vaccine
I interview musician Jeff Diamond who lost his fingers after the vax from amputation. He got the shot, was later found unconscious in his home, was taken to the hospital, and when he woke up discovered his fingers had been amputated. A very tragic story.
The echo was my fault for not selecting echo cancellation. Apologies.
7.07K
views
49
comments
James Lyons-Weiler: Everything you'd want to know about the PCR test
... and also whether the virus exists.
Briefly, the PCR test can work if it is done properly. It isn't being done properly anywhere.
The virus does exist.
7.3K
views
74
comments
Interview with virologist Li-Meng Yan on the origins of SARS-CoV-2 and what's next
Dr. Yan discusses the information she has about who funded the creation of the virus (we did), where it was done (WIV), whether it was deliberately released (it was), whether the Chinese vaccine works (it doesn't), is it a bioweapon (yes), what was it design to do (create havoc in China's enemies esp the US), and more.
16.4K
views
102
comments
I interview Patrick Gunnels who claims that viruses don't exist
I asked on my Substack if anyone would debate me on whether the virus exists. Only 3 people registered. I emailed all three asking for who is ready to define the positions now in a 1:1 call. Only Gunnels replied; Marius replied he wasn’t comfortable with a 1:1 call. So I let Gunnels control the platform so I couldn’t be accused of any trickery, and we talked for over 90 minutes so I could hear his arguments and so I could ask questions.
The transcript is posted here: http://www.skirsch.com/covid/GunnelsDebate.pdf
Patrick's argument is that if you cannot prove it to his specifications (based on outdated Koch's postulates which he believes are necessary to establish you have a virus), then the virus doesn't exist.
Patrick believes that the null hypothesis is that viruses do not exist. Therefore, if you want to disprove that, you must show (to his specifications) that a virus DOES exist.
Sorry, but that's NOT how science works.
Science would say there are two hypotheses: the null hypothesis (no virus) and the “virus” hypothesis. We’ll call them hypothesis A and B.
What scientists do is then collect data. They then look at the data and make a decision: is this observation consistent with A, B, both, or neither.
There have been millions of observations by scientists over the past 100 years and these observations as far as I know are all consistent with B.
This is why virtually all scientists believe viruses exist.
Now Stefan Lanka comes along and says (I’m paraphrasing here), “whoops. You never PROVED you can isolate a virus! Therefore, it is more likely that they don’t exist because if a virus existed someone should have “isolated it” based on MY definition of isolation, not yours. So we have to accept there is no virus or virology until you meet a set of criteria that I define that are based on the outdated Koch’s postulates and my interpretation of them.”
Lanka offers anyone 100,000 euros if they can prove in a SINGLE paper that the measles virus exists. This is done by David Bardens using 6 papers. Lanka never uses the single paper argument in the lower court and loses in court based on expert testimony about whether the offer was satisfied. On appeal, Lanka points out the single paper requirement, and the judgement is overturned as a matter of law, not science since higher courts never rule on the evidence.
Requiring proof in a SINGLE paper is not how science works.
Now they want to use similar methods to prove SARS-CoV-2 doesn’t exist, even though we can see it.
I contacted Li Meng Yan.
She wrote: “The SARS-CoV-2 in the video was isolated and cultivated by my husband Ranawaka A P M Perera in the same WHO H5 Reference Lab with me at the University of Hong Kong in Jan 2020. It was the first time to isolate SARS-CoV-2 out of mainland China. His name was not mentioned in the video (as “staff” at the end of the attached picture). My bosses are JS Malik Peiris and L M Poon. Btw, JS Malik Peiris is a core scientist in CCP’s unrestricted bioweapon program. He is a secret communist from Sri Lanka. “
Here is the video. You can see the virus in it: https://youtu.be/aOZvf5NOFHs
It’s easy to convince me I’m wrong.
Patrick needs to show me that the observed data is a better fit to his hypothesis than mine. That's science.
He completely failed to do that.
I gave him a very simple example so he could show his hypothesis could better explain the series of events observed with my recent COVID infection than my hypothesis.
He couldn’t show that. He was mystified how a series of people could be infected and show a positive antigen test. He had NO EXPLANATION.
Science is about showing YOUR explanation BETTER fits the observed data than THEIR explanation.
We are so far apart, this discussion isn't worth going forward. This is a complete waste of time.
If anything, Patrick made me more confident that virology is legit and SARS-CoV-2 is a real virus.
Nobody who said Patrick won is able to show the observations are better explained by the null hypothesis.
When I show people that the vaccine is dangerous, I assemble hundreds of pieces of data that simply cannot be explained if the vaccine is safe. All those datapoints are consistent with an unsafe vaccine. So I’m able to do both with the vaccines. I show the data cannot be explained by the “safe and effective” hypothesis and can easily be explained by the “not safe” hypothesis.
Patrick assembled 0 pieces of observed data consistent with his hypothesis. He just said that because an experiment he specifies hasn’t been done to his satisfaction, that’s all it takes. So Li Meng Yan’s husband’s work is tossed out because Patrick doesn’t believe it.
You are welcome to disagree and I will not suppress your views. We are all entitled to our opinions and how we choose to spend our time. As for me, I'm out.
If you want to comment, please refrain from ad hominem attacks, who won the “debate”, etc. Please focus on how scientists decide which hypothesis better fits observed data. If you think the virus doesn’t exist, show how that hypothesis is more LIKELY to explain the observations.
For example, if there is no SARS-CoV-2, then it should be impossible to create an antigen test from the genome reference RNA and then have these tests consistently go positive when people become sick.
If there is no virus, how are these tests going positive when you get sick and go negative when you get well?
Nobody will explain that.
Finally, Patrick admitted in the video that bacteriophages exist and have been isolated. But bacteriophages are viruses. EVERY virologist and molecular biologists say that. But Patrick says no, bacteriophages are not viruses because nobody has ever seen them reproduce. I asked him how they replicate then. At that point, he resorted to ad hominem attacks and told me to stop emailing him.
I guess that is how science works. When the questions start getting uncomfortable, you dive into ad hominem attacks and refuse to answer a simple question.
Got it.
If anyone wants to answer how bacteriophages can replicate in the comments, I’m all ears. Patrick says that bacteriophages are NOT replication-competent because it has not been observed. OK, so how come there are so many of them that they can be isolated in a centrifuge? Who is making copies of them? Has that process been observed? In what paper?
Are they any virologists or molecular biologists agreeing with Patrick that bacteriophages are NOT a virus?
You are welcome to believe what you want. I wasn’t convinced.
The full article is here: https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/is-there-a-virus-round-1
13.1K
views
450
comments