mohammedkalle

plus the different skills of each cadre in R6, the tactical cooperation between each other is a lot,

asically, it is difficult for newcomers to R6 to have a good game experience before level 30,

mainly because of the very unfriendly to newcomers, the terrain is complex, leading to newcomers have not yet seen the enemy was killed,

after all, out of the prison test phase, R6 is also gradually get rid of the bugs after the health action.

Even so, ZERO HOUR's combat experience is not comparable to R6's, and not just because of bugs, modeling,

is reflected in the many non-lethal weapons, "bloodless" is the main gameplay of "Swat",

, knowing that "Swat" is considered the originator of the tactical FPS, and in the 90s it achieved the combination of FPS,

the game time is bound to be significantly longer and will be taken up by a lot of tactical time. And for FPS games

For "ZERO HOUR" and "three-dimensional maps" like R6, the level of tactical complexity is much higher Especially when ZERO HOUR adds more details to the game,

sense of game experience once again, causing "Armed Assault 3" to become a niche game. You should know that the map in "Armed Assault

and tactical planning and execution requires players to act in unison

which is often half an hour of tactical planning and execution, and ten minutes of shooting combat.

are tactics-based FPS games. In FPS games, tactical time and combat time make up the whole game experience for players.

for example, the map in R6 games are based on buildings, and the complexity of the terrain highlights the importance of tactics,

CQB games are simulated realistic indoor close combat, so the game map is relatively not particularly large,

and the space moved along its pace, and gradually became distorted.