jerrymcguire1985

⁣The two most crucial facts in this audio passage are that there was no blood at the scuttle hole and that blood was discovered on the factory's second floor. Even though it was a holiday, the factory's foreman, Lemmie Quinn, entered and informed the narrator that he couldn't keep him away from the workplace. The narrator then collected their papers and went upstairs to visit the boys who were on the top floor. Mrs. White claims that she passed by and noticed the narrator at 12:35. In order to see the boys on the top floor, the narrator then collected their papers and went there. In order to see the boys on the top floor, the narrator then collected their papers and went upstairs to visit the boys who were on the top floor. The most crucial information in this passage, according to the narrator, is that Albert didn't eat anything and came in close to 130. Before leaving and catching the car, he went to the dining room sideboard and stood there for a while. The story was related to Craven by Manola McKnight's husband, who said these things to the officers, and he didn't consume anything in the dining room. If Gordon had not said it, then he was not deserving of the title of lawyer because he was down there and could have said it. The most crucial information in this passage is that Manola McKnight's attorney, George Gordon, sits there and watches as she puts her fist to the paper and makes a false swearing declaration that could land her in jail. Her attorney, George Gordon, could have obtained a writ of habeas corpus to have her released from custody as soon as he could have reached a judge. But Craven and Albert were present, and Minola McKnight was seated there with her attorney, George Gordon, who was eager to introduce something into the case that these men had been requesting for a long time but had never been able to until he took the stand and swore that she had said something that was untrue as you can see from the questions I asked him. The two most crucial information in this passage are that Albert McKnight is accused of lying to the detectives and that he was reluctant to take over their operations for fear of alienating them. Additionally, he is charged with lying to a photographer as well as his wife, Mrs. Selig. Additionally, Mrs. Selig and a photographer were allegedly deceived by Albert. Additionally, he is charged with lying to a photographer and his wife, Mrs. Selig. In addition, Mrs. Selig, Albert's wife, and a photographer are both charged with lying to them. He is also charged with lying to a photographer and his wife, Mrs. Selig. Additionally, Albert is charged with lying to a photographer and his wife, Mrs. Selig. ⁣The key information in this audio recording is that George Gordon, a man who is passing himself off as an attorney, permitted a woman to put her fist to a piece of paper and swear to it, sending her to the penitentiary. Albert McKnight did not eat anything in the dining room, according to an affidavit Minola McKnight made in support of this man. Albert McKnight is supported by the evidence provided by the photos, Julius Fisher, and other people who entered the dining room after the sideboard had been moved, and it is clear that once the sideboard was adjusted, Albert McKnight had complete visibility of the entire space. That Albert stayed there for about five or ten minutes and checked himself in the mirror in the corner was a too-straight-forward and reasonable-sounding story. When Leo M. Frank entered the home on April 26 between 1:00 and 2:00, Albert McKnight was questioned about whether he saw him. He says to Albert that he saw him enter the building between 1:00 and 2:00, that he stayed for only about 10 minutes, and then he left to go to town. Additionally, he says to Albert that he saw Manola enter the space but leave after just a few seconds in the dining room. Additionally, Albert claims to have seen Leo M. Frank leave the sideboard and return to the city, though Albert has never been inside the home and is unsure whether or not he actually did. The most crucial information in this passage is when Mr. Dorsey informed Mr. Craven, the manager of the plow department at Beck and Greg Hardware Company, that he had told the truth and was upheld. Mr. Dorsey was even more exhausted than he had anticipated on August 25, and he regretted the need for him to be postponed for another week—or rather, another Sunday. He had just finished a brief analysis of the defendant's statement and wasn't going to continue with a more thorough analysis because it would only cause him more trouble and he lacked the physical stamina. The defendant stated that his wife visited him at the police station and that she was there almost in hysterics, having been brought there by her father, two brothers in law, and Rabbi Marks. These are the most crucial details in this audiobook. Rabbi Marks, who was with the defendant, advised him on whether it would be wise to let his wife visit the top floor so she could see the surroundings, city detectives, reporters, and snapshotters. The accused relies only on his own statement and offers no evidence of a living person to support his claim. Mr. Arnold disagrees with the claim that his wife didn't go there out of any sense of guilt on his part, but he does not take issue with any allusion to his wife's failure to make the trip to see him. ⁣The most significant information in this text is that Mr. Arnold disagreed with Mr. Dorsey's assertion that his wife never returned there because she was afraid of being photographed by snapshotters. Additionally, Frank mentioned that Conley had written him numerous notes with a pencil asking for a loan. Conley's card from the jeweler he purchased the watch from on an installment plan was discovered in the safe's drawer, and Scott there confirmed Conley's account of what happened when he told him not to take any more money out of the safe and the watch incident. That has never happened, according to Scott. The most crucial information in this passage is that Frank was aware of James Conley's writing prowess but chose to remain silent until the detectives linked him to the Phagan case. Frank was aware that Conley could write because he checked the pencil boxes and wrote numerous notes to him in an effort to obtain money. Conley also wrote the notes for Frank that he used to try and shift the blame for the crime to another man. Finding the author of the notes buried with the body was the most convincing evidence that could be used to identify the perpetrator of the crime. As stated in the notes, a Black person committed the crime. Conley visited the factory and jail, where he intended to confront Branch, which Frank and Branch talk about. Frank assured them that if they obtained Mr. Rosser's approval, he would speak with them and deal with Conley. Mr. Rosser tried a case at Talua Falls, but he left afterward. Frank continues by informing the jury that no white man has ever been falsely accused of a crime by an ignorant, filthy black man and refused to appear in front of him. Furthermore, he notes that no other race has ever in its history had a white man who has been accused of a crime by an ignorant, filthy black man refuse to go up against him. A lawyer half as skilled as his client, Mr. Luther Z. Rosser, had a conscience of his client's innocence and would have confronted the accuser if he had falsely accused him of a crime. When he suggested that Frank engage in a filthy farce with a filthy Negro, he made his first and last statements, claiming that these addenda were unheard-of, that no one had ever dreamed of meeting them, and that Frank had no chance to do so. This is untrue because, when he first suggested performing the farce, he said that no one had ever heard of these addenda and that Frank had no chance to meet them. ⁣The most crucial information in this passage is that Mr. Dorsey is involved for his life and that Mr. Rosser has the right to interrupt him when he falsifies the truth. He also has the right to voice a valid objection, and Frank declined to face Conley in the meeting the detectives suggested when he was out of the city. However, Mr. Rosser has not objected to the fact that Frank declined to be confronted by Conley at the meeting suggested by the detectives when he was out of the city, and that if that meeting had taken place, he would have been aware of Conley's statement. The most crucial information in this text is that Mr. Dorsey has the right to comment on the defendant's behavior but is not permitted to do so while the defendant is presenting their objections to the court. Mr. Dorsey is free to comment on any behavior that falls within the purview of this trial, but he is not permitted to do so if his objection is upheld. Mr. Dorsey has the right to comment on any behavior falling within the purview of this trial even though he is not outside of the record and is instead included in it. The most crucial information in this passage is that Leo Frank, a Cornell graduate and the factory's superintendent, declined to meet Jim Conley, a clueless black man, on the grounds that his counsel was out of town. He had the chance to learn at least some of the accusations Conley had leveled at him when his counsel reappeared. At twelfth hour on Tuesday, April 29, Frank went inside and conducted a neutral interview over there. Instead of getting involved with this Negro who was new to Lee, the man he had famously directed suspicion at in order to save his own neck, he did not behave like a man who wanted to discover the truth. Frank did not make a sincere, honest, or diligent effort to uncover the truth in order to maintain his good standing with residents of Washington Street and Bennet Bryth members. The detectives emphasize the likelihood that couples may have been permitted access to the factory at night by night watchman Newt Lee, who had only been employed there for two or three weeks. This is one of the most crucial details in the text. Due to the detectives' emphasis on the fact that couples frequented the area on weekends, holidays, and at night whenever other night watchmen were present, Lee effectively prevented the state from challenging or refuting his claim. The detectives emphasize that couples were in the factory while Newt Lee, the night watchman, was keeping an eye on things, even though Newt had only been working there for three weeks, Frank adds. This is due to the detectives' emphasis on the fact that couples had entered the factory while Newt Lee, the night watchman, was on duty, despite the fact that Newt had only been working there for three weeks. ⁣The defendant's claim that the alleged blood spots were actually paint and varnish rather than actual blood is the subject of the majority of the text's crucial details. In contrast, the defendant asserts that there was not even a single spot, much less a blood spot, on the floor where Barrett worked. The defendant also claims that he witnessed the girls drop paint and varnish bottles, causing them to shatter on the floor. The defendant claims that if fresh red paint or fresh red blood had been used instead, the haskelline compound with soap in it—a powerful solvent—would not have been applied in a liquid state and would instead have appeared pink or red instead of the white that it did at the time. The defendant also claims that he saw the girls drop bottles of paint and varnish, causing them to break on the floor. If that had been fresh red paint or fresh red blood, and that haskelline compound with the soap in it, which is an excellent solvent, had been applied there when it was still liquid, it wouldn't have happened, the defendant claims. The most crucial details in this audiobook series are the arguments put forth by the jurors in the Leo Frank case. They contend that Hascline combined with the blood on the second floor would have had the same outcome as what the witnesses have testified to. Additionally, they contend that the testimony of Atlanta's city bacteriologist Dr. Claude Smith and doctoral witness Dr. Roy Harris contradicts the jurors' testimony. Finally, they contend that the jurors' testimony conflicts with the testimony of Drs. Roy Harris and Claude Smith. Last but not least, they contend that Dr. Roy Harris' testimony conflicts with what the jurors have said.

⁣⁣The most crucial information in this passage is that Frank sat in his office and counted the money that was still in the payroll account from the $1,100 that they had withdrawn on Friday. Old Jim Conley said he would go if he went, but he had too much common sense when Frank wanted him to go down into the dark cellar and burn the body alone. He was prepared to assist Frank in moving the body from the second floor where the blood was discovered into the basement while remaining silent until Scott, Black, Starnes, and all of these detectives combined their efforts to subdue him and force him to occasionally make an admission. He didn't want to, and he had too much common sense, to enter the cellar, perform that filthy task by himself, and cremate the remains of the young girl Frank had killed. The most crucial information in this text is that Willie Turner, a naive country boy from Oak Grove near Sandy Springs in the northern part of this county, saw Frank trying to force his attention on a young girl in the middle room in March and that he had made up the payroll with Chef 52 times during the year that Mary Phagan was there but still didn't know her name or number. Frank continues by telling Willie that he is the factory superintendent, which is a form of coercion, and that he had passed by her machine without even noticing it twelve months prior. When Mary Phagan was working there for a year, Willie says he made up the payroll with Chef 52 times, but he still didn't know her name or phone number. He then claims to be the factory superintendent, which is a form of coercion, and informs Willie of this. The most crucial information in this text is that Little Dewey Hool, a young child who used to work at the National Pencil Company in Cincinnati and claimed to the police that she frequently overheard him speaking to her, was lying. Leo M. Frank allegedly said to Gantt, the long-legged man who attempted to point suspicion towards the person Schiff was so eager to have arrested, "I see that you know Mary pretty well". Gantt lied to the police when he claimed that Frank had noticed that he knew Mary only a little and had said as much. Mr. There's no telling what a pervert will do when he's spurred on by the unusual, extraordinary passion that spurred on this man, Leo M. Frank, when he saw his opportunity with this young girl in the pencil factory when she returned to see if the medal had arrived, according to a quote from Burns that Rosser used in his essay. The main point of this text is that everyone involved, including Willie Turner, Dewey Hool, Gantt, Miss Ruth Robinson, Frank, and Chief Detective Harry Scott, has lied. Frank acknowledges that he was familiar with Mary well enough to know that Gantt was acquainted with her, and that Chief Detective Harry Scott had been informed that Gantt was acquainted with Little Mary. Additionally, Frank acknowledges that he had enough of a relationship with Mary to be aware that Gantt was aware of her, and that this made him suspicious of him. The most crucial information in this passage is that Frank checked the amount of money left over from the payroll from the $1,100 that they had drawn on Friday as he sat in his office. Old Jim said he would go if he went, but he had too much sense when Frank wanted him to burn the body alone in the dark cellar. He was prepared to assist Frank in moving the body from the second floor where the blood was discovered into the basement while remaining silent until Scott, Black, Starnes, and all of these detectives combined their efforts to subdue him and force him to occasionally make an admission. He didn't want to and lacked the common sense to enter the cellar alone, perform the filthy task of cremating the remains of the young girl Frank had killed. The most crucial information in this text is that Willie Turner, a naive country boy from Oak Grove near Sandy Springs in the northern part of this county, saw Frank trying to force his attention on a young girl in the middle room in March and that he had made up the payroll with Chef 52 times during the year that Mary Phagan was there but still didn't know her name or number. Frank then claims to be the factory superintendent, which is a form of coercion, and informs Willie that a man with his brilliant parts would not even be aware of her if he had simply passed by her machine a year earlier. Willie continues by telling Frank that during the year Mary Phagan worked there, he had made up the payroll with Chef 52 times, but he still didn't know her name or phone number. When Mary Phagan was employed there for a year, Frank made up the payroll with Chef 52 times, but he still didn't know her name or phone number. He then claims to be the factory superintendent, which is a form of coercion, and informs Willie of this. The most crucial information in this text is that Little Dewey Hool, a young child who used to work at the National Pencil Company in Cincinnati and claimed to the police that she frequently overheard him speaking to her, was lying. Mr. Rosser quoted from Burns and said it's human to err, and that there's no telling what a pervert will do when he's goaded on by the unusual, extraordinary passion that goaded on this man, Leo M. Frank, when he saw his opportunity with this little girl in the pencil factory when she went back to find out if the medal had come. The most important details in this text are that all of the people involved have lied, including Willie Turner, Dewey Hool, Gantt, Miss Ruth Robinson, Frank, and Chief Detective Harry Scott. Frank admits that he knew Mary well enough to know that Gantt was familiar with her, and that Chief Detective Harry Scott was told that this man Gantt was familiar with Little Mary. Frank also admits that he knew Mary well enough to know that Gantt was familiar with her, and that he directed suspicion towards him. Gantt, the long legged man who tried to direct suspicion towards the man Schiff was so anxious to have arrested, lied when he told the police that Leo M. Frank noticed that he knew little Mary and said to him I see that you know Mary pretty well. ⁣The most crucial information in this text is that Leo M. Frank assisted in creating the payroll for 52 times and noticed Little Mary's name there, but he didn't even know who she was and had to go get his book to determine whether or not she was employed there. Additionally, he claimed that cash shortages persisted even after Gantt left and that Frank stole that young girl back in March. Additionally, he claimed that he saw Gantt as a hindrance to the realization of his evil purpose and that he was fired from the factory for this reason rather than for a $1 shortage. The payroll was finalized on Friday, he added, with Schiff. The information regarding the scheme to cheat and ruin Little Mary Phagan is the most crucial information in this text. In the story, the protagonist makes plans to return on Saturday at noon to collect her pay with Jim Conley, a man who has protected her in the past. When they don't object, the main character makes plans with Mary Phagan's friend Helen Ferguson to give her the pay envelope. Jim tells the main character on Saturday that he followed the factory superintendent's instructions exactly. After that, the main character comes to understand that passion can behave mysteriously and is similar to fraud. The defendant, Detective Scott, attempted to mislead the jury of honorable men into thinking that he did not know the Ferguson girl, but he actually did. This is one of the most crucial details in the text. Additionally, he claimed that these slips were a beautiful statement he made and that he kept the key to his cash box in his desk. The accused further claimed that he was infatuated with the Ferguson girl and lacked the ability to restrain his passion. Last but not least, the defendant claimed he was infatuated with the Ferguson girl and lacked the ability to restrain his passion. The defendant also claimed that he was infatuated with the Ferguson girl and was powerless to rein in his passion. The speaker took a break from her work and went to the outside office to talk with Mr. Darley and Mr. Campbell. Miss Maddie Smith arrived and requested her pay envelope at 9:15, or quarter after nine. Jim identified Miss Maddie Smith and described her actions in detail. Additionally, he demonstrated that he had a drink at Crookshank Soda Fountain and continued to converse with Mr. Dot Montague. In the folder that Old Jim had and had stored, the speaker also moved the papers he had brought back from Montagues. Every Saturday afternoon, he would check to see how close the reports were to finishing their work on his financial statement. ⁣The two most significant facts in this text are that two gentlemen arrived and that the sheet that lists the number of pencils packed for the week didn't include the report for Thursday, the day the fiscal week ended. One of them, Mr. Graham, spoke with a black person downstairs, and they attempted to avoid it by claiming there was a color difference. The two fathers received the necessary pay envelope from Frank, who also had a lengthy conversation with them. Old Jim Conley was never given the chance to learn the words he employs, and the man in question speaks in exactly the same words that Jim does. At 12:00, the whistle blew, signaling Miss Hall's completion of her work and her intention to leave. Frank then greeted them as they entered, using the same language Jim claimed he had used to describe this girl. On the top floor were Arthur White, Harry Denham, and Arthur White's wife when Miss Hall left her office to head home. Mary Phagan, a young child, came into the office and requested her pay envelope. Jim Conley was still seated downstairs when the man Frank, who was at the safe when Mrs. Dot White entered, jumped. This incident demonstrates that Jim Conley did not carry out the deed at the time because he had to allow Mrs. White to ascend after he had tipped up and back. He was aware that these men would work and remain on that floor after they had their lunches after Mrs. Dot White had been up there for a while. Frank was eager to get Mrs. White outside the building when she saw Conley there at 12:50. He was eager to leave, but instead of leaving, he went back to his office and sat down at his desk. Since the girl only received a small amount of blood from a lick to the back of her head and Jim Conley didn't drop the girl as he passed by the dressing room, there was no blood to be found back there. Conley assaulted her, hit her, and then gagged her with that while she was unresponsive. Frank was well-known among the B'nai B'rith, Haases, Montagues, followers of Dr. Marx, and the B'nai B'rith, as well as among Brooklyn's wealthy and impoverished residents and those in Athens. He also enjoyed the respect of the members of these organizations. He fixed the young girl he had assaulted with the cord to save his reputation after she refused to budge. If that little girl had survived to tell the tale of the brutal assault, men would have emerged in this town, but Frank didn't anticipate that she would decline his advances. He had laid the trap and believed that the helpless little girl would succumb to his pressure. ⁣ ⁣The most crucial information in this passage is that Mrs. Dot Whiteout, who witnessed Frank jump at 12:35 while he was about to inquire about Little Mary's pay envelope, was concerned about the mesh bag he was carrying. Old Jim Conley was still patiently awaiting the signal when Mrs. White returned at 12:35. After gagging her with a piece of her underskirt torn from her own underskirt, he tipped up to the front where he knew the cords hung and choked that poor little child to death. According to the text, the man is different from other men because he desired the girl he saw and when she rejected him, he struck and gagged her. According to the text, the man is not like other men because he coveted the girl he saw but she rejected him, and when she did, he struck her and gagged her. The most crucial information in this passage is that Mary Phagan was both strangled by Able Counsel and Durant, and that the blood on the floor was not paint, cat, or rat blood. Since Mary Phagan's blood matched the way Jim Conley claimed he dropped the body, Able Counsel attempted to make it seem as though the blood was Mary Phagan's rather than paint or cat's blood. Mary Phagan's blood was spilt toward the dressing room, and Chief Beavers recognized it as such when he noticed how Jim Conley claimed to have dropped the body. Starnes tells the tale of Christopher Columbus Barrett, who located the hair that Magnolia Kennedy recognized on Monday morning. Frank Holloway claimed that Jim Conley was his nigger, but Barrett didn't catch him in a single lie and pitted him against him. Frank Sunday Morning was betrayed and trapped by Holloway after it became clear that too many people had seen him go there and operate the power box without first going to his office to get the key. After realizing the persuasiveness of the suggestion and having assured them that he had always, without fail, locked the elevator box himself and stored the key in Frank's office, he betrayed and ensnared them. The defendant, Jim Conley, lied to obtain a reward for the conviction of his employer and boss, which is one of the most crucial details in this text. In contrast to this, Barrett, the person who found hair on his machine in the early morning, stood up for truth and justice and spoke out despite the fact that it could have cost him his job. This demonstrates how Barrett, even though his job was in jeopardy, stood up for what was right and stood on an oasis in a vast desert. ⁣The most crucial information in this text is that Barrett, a National Pencil Company employee, told the truth when he pledged that he discovered blood where Conley claimed he dropped the body and that he discovered that hair on that machine. He made his discoveries on Monday, April 28, and they bear no resemblance to plants. Mrs. Dot Jefferson observed a dark red spot about the size of a fan and believed it to be blood. Barrett is not shown to have lied, dodged, or equivocated to her. Mel Stanford reported seeing blood in the dressing room on Monday. The blood appeared as dark spots that were exactly like blood, and a white substance called haskelline had been applied on top of it. Also mentioned in the text is Mrs. Jefferson's observation of a dark red spot about the size of a fan, which she believed to be blood. The discovery of a body in the enemy camp by Barrett, Jefferson, Mel Stanford, Beavers, Starnes, and Darley is one of the text's most significant revelations. The discovery was made on Monday by Barrett, Jefferson, Mel Stanford, Beavers, Starnes, and Darley, who noticed what appeared to be blood spots in the dressing room with a white substance smeared over it as if to conceal it. Dr. Connolly and Mr. Mangum are both aware of how risky it is to enter the enemy's camp in order to obtain ammunition, but in this instance, they dared to do so and discovered the best proof that Frank was more anxious than he had ever been except on two occasions. Darley noticed the blood, which gave Montague great cause for concern. Darley found it difficult to swallow, but after they pressed the issue, he was forced to admit it and dared not retract his statements from the affidavit he had signed. Okay, so I'm not going to call over every single Mrs. Carson who says she saw blood on Friday, but Mel Stanford, a worker and an honorable man, sweeps the floor. Dr. Claude Smith, a city bacteriologist, examines the blood and unearths blood core mysteries. Mr. Lee asserts that the blood had been present ever since Machinist Lee saw Duffy stand there with his finger cut and let it spout out at the conclusion. All of his own witnesses, including Mary Pierk, Julia Puss, Magnolia Kennedy, Wade Campbell, and Schiff, claim to have seen the area covered in something white that they all recognize as haskelline. Jim Conley was killed, and Harry Scott, Pierce, Echo, Whitfield, and Mcworth are accused of it. The scuttle hole was empty after the murder, according to every witness. Darley Holloway, a Frank who had access to the factory, would have informed Frank that blood stains had been discovered near the scuttle hole. Holloway understood that something had to emerge to support the claim that Jim Conley was responsible after Conley was taken into custody. After spending the entire day searching the factory, McWorth discovered seven sizable stains, an envelope, and a stick in a corner. He definitely found too much. ⁣⁣The most crucial information in this passage is that the police officers who were peering through Newt Lee's home's basement scuttle hole would have missed seven sizable stains that weren't discovered until May 15. As of May 3, according to Scott, Starnes, Rosser, Mel Stanford, and Darley, the area had been cleaned up. However, none of these men, including the ones who cleaned up, ever noticed the stains or even came across the stick or envelope. Frank, a Cornell alumnus, took a slip out of the clock and examined it before telling the detectives that Newt Lee wouldn't have had time to leave and get dressed after killing the girl. He was aware that Lanford, Black, and the other detectives would have immediately examined the slip and determined whether these punches were regular or irregular. If he attempted to pull off a fraud at that particular moment and location, he was aware that he would be caught. Leo M. Frank informs John Black that Newt Lee didn't have time, despite his suggestion that he go outside and conduct a search at his home. When John visits Newt's house after receiving the information, he discovers a shirt with a bloody odor but no sign of the negro neutery in the armpit. Instead of placing it on one side as any man moving a body would have done, he spreads it across both. This provides clear proof that someone planted the shirt on Monday, though at whose initiative and suggestion we are unsure. The wound was not caused by a doctor, but rather by Harris and Dr. Hertz, who both refute this. The shirt wasn't on the wearer when the blood got on it, according to a physical examination. While Lee didn't explicitly claim ownership of the shirt, he didn't either. After the Scuttle Hole had been thoroughly cleaned and searched by Scott Campbell, Rosser Starnes, and others on May 15, an envelope and a stick were discovered there. It is implied that these events weren't connected to the same plan that led Frank to create notes placed by the body to deflect attention from him.

⁣A key detail in the audiobook is that Frank's mother said that anyone who knew his writing should be able to identify it, and that the man put up to prove Frank's writing was so afraid of injury that he wouldn't identify the writing. He also showed nervousness when he went to run the elevator, nail up the door, talk to the police, and ride to the station. He also showed frivolity when he was waiting for Old Jim to come back to burn the body, such as laughing and joking and trying to read a story that resulted in annoyance to the people in the card game. The text ends with a message from Tonte, the German for aunt, wishing Frank and Tonte a safe journey home. The most important details in this text are that Frank wrote a letter to his uncle on Saturday the 26th, which shows that he anticipated that the old gentleman who runs the cigar business had wealthy people in Brooklyn. He also wrote a sentence that bears the earmarks of the guilty conscience tremulous as he wrote it. This sentence was written when he knew that the body of little Mary Phagan, who died for virtue's sake, lay in the dark recesses of that basement. This shows that the dastardly deed was done in an incredibly short time, and that the phrase penned by the man to his uncle on Saturday afternoon didn't come from a conscience that was its own accuser. The most important details in this text are that Leo M. Frank is an eminent authority who believes that unusual, unnecessary, unexpected and extravagant expressions are always earmarks of fraud, and that the old man cared nothing for the veterans who braved the chilly weather to do honor to their fallen comrades. This is significant because today was Yontif holiday and the thin, gray lines of veterans braved the rather chilly weather to do honor to their fallen comrades. Leo M. Frank is a statistician and the millionaire, or nearly so, who cared so little about the thin, gray line of veterans but cared all for how much money had been gotten in by the pencil factory. There was something startling in the factory within the space of 30 minutes, and the letter was written in the morning. Do you believe it? The most important details in this text are that a rich uncle, Leo M. Frank, was living in Brooklyn and had at least $20,000 in cold cash out on interest. His brother in law was the owner of a store employing two or three people, and if the uncle wasn't in Brooklyn, he was so near there that even Frank himself thought he was there. On April 28, Frank wired Adolf Montague in care of the Imperial Hotel, telling him that a factory girl was found dead Sunday morning in a cellar of the pencil factory, where he placed her and expected her to be found. ⁣The incidents leading up to the murder of a factory girl discovered dead in a pencil factory cellar on April 28th are the most crucial details in this text. Montague received a call on Monday, April 28th, from a man saying that his company had the case well under control and that the police would eventually crack the case. Additionally, he informed Montague that Scott could have obtained the slush fund if it had been present because his firm had the case under control. Haas countered that there might have been something else if Scott had accepted that advice. This implies that something else might have happened if Scott had accepted Haas' suggestion. Despite what Joe Darter Schiff swore when he realized he had to confront Miss Fleming's evidence, this evidence demonstrates that Frank did not fix the financial sheet on Saturday morning. Frank got up on the stand and realized that his case was weak because he wasn't happy with all the evidence that was being presented about what he had done. He wrote that statement, and he was as intelligent as either of his attorneys. With his statement, Frank attempted to introduce something for which they lacked any supporting evidence after realizing that he had to go above and beyond what the evidence showed. He was aware that the claims made about how long it would take to correct the financial sheet were untrue. The jurors' testimony in the case of Frank Arnold constitutes the most significant details in this text. The evidence consists of both documentary proof that a man is guilty and proof that a person lied under oath, as in the case of a man who was called to identify a piece of writing as being by Frank but who was unable to do so despite Frank's own mother swearing that he could have done so. Mrs. Carson's testimony about her three years of factory work is also included, and Mr. Arnold's testimony is not made under oath. Last but not least, there is testimony from Mr. Arnold who is not under oath regarding the three years of work Mrs. Carson performed in the factory. The text ends by stating that justice must be served and that the man who carried out the heinous act has received the same punishment from God that he received for what he did to this helpless little girl. The two most crucial facts in this passage are that the woman had a conversation with Jim Conley on Tuesday morning and that she had noticed blood spots in her dressing room three or four times over the course of three years. On Tuesday morning, between 9 and 11:30, she also saw Leo M. Frank on the fourth floor. Between the same hours, Jim Conley and Leo M. Frank were both on the woman's floor, and she spoke with both of them. Even if these men had intended to suborn perjury, the woman thinks that Conley could not have been made to do it. ⁣The most crucial information in this passage is that Jim Conley and Frank were both on the same floor, and that Jim was doing exactly what he claimed he was doing—sweeping. ⁣Frank and Conley were standing in front of the elevator when Frank went down the steps. Conley was still standing there with his hand on the thing when Frank passed him. Mrs. Small testified that the elevator shakes the whole building, but you can't notice it unless you are close to it. She said if there was hammering and knocking, you could still hear the elevator if you got close to it. Nobody disputed that. The blood on the second floor piqued Mrs. Carson's interest, Miss Rebecca's mother. Jim Conley was anxious to get the newspapers, according to Mrs. Small, because he was aware of some information that he wanted to see how black people looked. Then Mr. Arnold posed a query to Mrs. Carson that would be addressed to all of the female employees of the fourth floor. The two women named Miss Kitchens and Mrs. Small—each of whom received a raise of five cents four months ago—are the most significant details in this text. Jim Conley's claim that Mrs. Small was up there on Tuesday between 8 and 9 a.m. is also supported by Mrs. Small. Mr. Rosser called the assertion that Mr. Frank asked Jim Conley to hide the crime as being a "dirty assertion," but Mr. Rosser accepts it as being true. The text also mentions Mr. Rosser's acceptance of the notion that Mr. Frank asked Jim Conley to cover up the crime and expected him to do so as a dirty suggestion. The most crucial information in this text is that Jim Conley was brought into the courtroom by him, at which point a jury of upright men tied a rope around his neck. Jim claims that when he first saw him down there following the crime, he asked him, "Have you seen anyone go up?". He claimed to have seen two girls ascend, but only one return. Given that he was aware that Jim was on the lookout for both him and Starnes, Campbell, and Black taken together, this man saw the absolute necessity of confiding in Jim. Jim made an effort to defend himself, but the suggestion was impure. The most crucial information in this passage is that Mrs. Small saw Leo Frank on the fourth floor between 8:00 and 9:00 on Tuesday morning, and the other woman saw him between 9:00 and 11:00. It took some time for the police to gain the nerve and the courage to face the situation and place him where he belonged because of the intimidation and fear Frank's influence caused them to feel when it came to assigning him to a cell like they did Lee and Conley. It took some time for the police force to gather enough courage to deal with the situation and place him where he belonged because they were initially intimidated and terrified by Frank's influence to confine him to a cell like they did Lee and Conley. The most crucial information in this text is that John Black and Mr. Rosser achieved great success thanks to Leo M. Frank; if Black had been given the chance to pursue Frank, this trial might have been avoided and a confession might have been obtained. This trial might have been avoided and a confession might have been obtained if Black had been given the chance to pursue Leo M. Frank. Black's methods were comparable to Rosser's methods. The Atlanta police department gave this man who killed that young girl undue consideration and allowed shrewd advice and the allure of power and wealth to dissuade them. They respect the approach they took in tracking down Manola McKnight, but if they believe that apprehending a young girl's murderer in broad daylight is a lady's affair and that detectives should behave like dancing masters, they are ignorant of the nature of the work. The most crucial information in this text is that John Starnes and Campbell were aware that Albert McKnight would never have told Craven what he saw and what his wife had told him, and that if Mr. Dot Haas had approached him on Tuesday morning and asked him to tell the police to let Frank go, he would have responded, "It's none of my business.". He is criticized for entering the situation at the outset and refusing to take a backseat while serving as Solicitor General for the duration of the term for which he was chosen by the people. He respects Mr. Dot Hill and is equally pleased to have succeeded him as he is to have been chosen by the residents of this community for the position of Solicitor General. He obeys his own conscience's directives. The most significant information in this text is that the Solicitor General is proud of the fact that he worked closely with the detectives to find Mary Phagan's killer and that he resolutely refused to yield to the grand jury's pressure to hang an innocent man. Additionally, he wishes that Mr. Dot Hill had been present to deliver the speech he is doing right now, as he was as honorable as any Roman, as brave as Julius Caesar, and as articulate as Demosthenes. In his final discussion of the subject, the Solicitor General asserts that everyone is a liar and that they are all "crack brain fanatics" without providing any specific examples. On Tuesday between 8:00 and 9:00, according to Mrs.dot Small, she saw Jim Conley and Mr.dot Frank in the factory's back area. When Mr. Conley and Miss Rebecca Carson emerged from the factory's back entrance, Mr. Conley stepped in front of them and enquired as to whether they intended to put him to work. He gave the ticket his approval and continued working. Frank and Miss Rebecca Carson were approaching the elevator, but Conley was waiting there by the elevator, not sweeping. The African-American man wasn't sweeping while he was there by the elevator. ⁣Conley was in front of the elevator when he descended the stairs, and Mrs. Small testified that the elevator shakes the entire building, which are the two most crucial facts in this passage. Mrs. Carson had previously sworn that she did not descend to see the blood but rather saw the locations where it was rumored to be. Mrs. Carson observed the alleged locations of the blood, as well as the alleged locations of the blood that appeared to be powder. The text ends by stating that Mrs. Carson had seen the alleged locations of the blood and that she had observed the locations as appearing like powder. The case of Leo M. Frank, a defendant accused of perjury, is discussed in the text. Although she didn't object to going down, he claims that Mrs. Carson and he were sent there out of curiosity. The letters that were discovered in Frank's office and which clearly show that the author knew about the deal are also discussed in the text. The text concludes by stating that these letters are the will of an all-powerful providence and that they have irrevocably fixed the crime upon Frank. The text says that the letters have inherent signs of knowledge of the transaction in it before it ends. The most crucial information in this text is that Jim Conley, a Black man who killed and stole from a girl in a dark basement, took the time to jot down notes on a scrap of paper outside of Frank's office. Being as inebriated as a fiddler's bitch prevented him from robbing the girl while being aware that Frank was present. The text also claims that committing a crime is a mistake in and of itself, and that both the criminal and the person trying to cover it up almost always make small errors. The text concludes by stating that crime is a mistake in and of itself, that the person committing the crime makes a mistake, and that the person trying to cover it up almost always makes a small mistake. ⁣The most significant information in this passage is that Scott's testimony was not questioned by the coroner and that Leo M. Frank informed the girl that he was unsure as to whether the medal had arrived or not before she returned to check. According to Jim Conley's statement, Frank mentioned wanting to talk to a girl four times before they broke up so that he could go outside and let Scott rest. In neither the coroner's office nor when Scott appeared before the coroner was Scott's evidence questioned. In order to expedite the hiring of a detective, he had the man switch the phone three times on Monday night. According to Jim Conley's statement, Frank mentioned wanting to talk to a girl four times before they broke up so that he could go outside and let Scott rest. Mr. Arnold's claim to the jury is that old Jim Conley, who had raped and killed a girl, took the time to conceal her body in the pencil factory's basement. The superintendent of the facility, Leo M. Frank, recognized the need for the girl's body not to be discovered on the second floor of the pencil factory and employed the language used in the letter or telegram he sent to Adolf Montague in New York in the cellar. With all of their ingenuity, Starns and Campbell couldn't have known that old Jim would stand up here and claim that the man looked at him when he ran into the baby as if he had done it, and they couldn't have forced him to say I locked the door like he did told me. The most crucial information in this passage is that a long, tall, black negro shoved another long, tall, black negro down a scuttle hole, and that the girl returned there to fetch water in the same direction that she would have gone to inquire about the metal. The long, tall, black man did it on his own, according to this note, and the girl went back there to fetch some water in the same direction that she would have gone to inquire about the metal. The note also claims that the long, tall, black negro struck the girl with a large stick, which is undoubtedly a fabrication—just as Newt Lee's shirt was, for that matter. The most crucial information in this text is that a black man had the cunning to leave a girl's form somewhere other than where he struck her and knocked her to the ground, and that Leo M. Frank felt compelled to write there letters that he thought would clear him but that instead cast doubt on and damn him in the minds of every man seeking the truth. Furthermore, when there is a pad of notes from an elderly Jim Conley, there is nothing in circumstantial evidence that the jury must admit or that they do not dispute. ⁣The most significant information in this text is that Jim Conley, a factory superintendent, was instructed to remain silent and defend Leo M. Frank, the factory superintendent. Leo M. Frank, the factory superintendent, who wired Montague to tell his uncle, was protected by the letter, which was written in his name. Not in the factory, but in the cellar, was where the girl's body was discovered. The letter was written with the awareness and conscience that the poor girl's life had already been taken even as he was writing it. Conley's guilt must be proven beyond a reasonable doubt to the jury; however, this requirement does not apply to the doubts of a crank, a man who has created them to exonerate a friend, or a man who was a friend of a friend. The most crucial information in this text is that circumstantial evidence is not less reliable than direct and positive evidence, and that it is appropriate to tell the jury that there is nothing about circumstantial evidence's nature that makes it less trustworthy than other types of evidence. The reliability of circumstantial evidence is demonstrated using two examples: the first compares incidental facts surrounding the main facts in issue to links in a chain, showing that a chain is only as strong as its weakest link, and the second compares incidental facts to the strands in a rope, showing that none of them may be sufficient on their own but that when combined, they may be powerful enough to prove guilt. The most significant information in this text is that each of these occurrences forms a chain, cord, strand, or cable, and that when combined, they form a cable that is as strong as can be woven around a human being. Unanalyzed, this man's statement to the jury was brilliant, and if the jury accepts it without questioning it, then of course they will not find him guilty. A statement has no such inherent strength as the testimony of a witness, which even a jury cannot in all cases ignore. This statement has been skillfully crafted to address the case's requirements. The text concludes by saying that, in contrast to statements, testimony has inherent weight that even a jury cannot, in all cases, disregard.

Attorney Hugh Dorsey's closing argument in Leo Frank's trial for the murder of Mary Phagan is a compelling outline of the case and a compelling argument that played a major role in the jury's conviction of Frank. This case is unusual for a crime, it is the most heinous crime, it is a crime committed by evil spirits, it requires vigorous, serious and conscientious efforts of detectives, and a sincere, serious and conscientious consideration of the case. is a crime that requires member of the jury. The prosecution had two of the country's most capable attorneys, Attorney Rosser and Attorney Arnold, who abused the defendants and the Criminal Investigation Unit. Also, they slandered the defendant so much that the defendant's mother was forced to stand up in front of her and denounce him like a dog. The most important detail of this document is that the investigators and authors of this case were not subject to prejudice, and that they dared come to this present day because they were non-Jews. It means that he would not have asked for guilt. Jews were black. But the detectives and the author, when they did not present their case in this way, and dared to embark on such a situation because they were Gentiles, Jews, or Negroes, did not find a man guilty of guilt. I was disappointed that I would not have asked for a sentence. The author believes that this man's native race is as good as we are, and that in a time when our ancestors roamed the forests freely and ate cannibals, his ancestors were civilized, lived in cities, and had laws. claim to have followed It honors the race that produced Disraeli, Judah P. Benjamin, the Strauss brothers, Abe Hummel, Roof and Schwartz, and dozens of others who murdered a girl in New York. The main detail of this document is that this great race is governed by the same laws as the rest of the white and black races, rising to the heights and sinking to the lowest depths of depravity. be. Copywriters, lawyers, and judges go round and round to define reasonable doubt judgments that are as obvious as the nose on the face. One lyricist has said that those who try to define it tautologically reuse the same word, but this is not a fantastic proposition. It's just a matter of common sense, an everyday, practical matter. The most important detail of this text is the definition of reasonable suspicion and unjustified suspicion. A reasonable suspicion is a suspicion that can be given reasons and is based on reasons. It must be very questionable whether man can control and decide his actions in the most important matters of life. It should not be a vague putative suspicion or mere conjecture that the accused may be innocent. It should not be an imaginary suspicion, a petty speculation, or a mere possibility of innocence. Don't be weird or overly sensitive. ⁣An important detail of this audio document is that circumstantial evidence is more reliable than direct evidence, and that a large number of witnesses who provide circumstantial evidence and a case suggestive of guilt is more likely to be the testimony of a small number of witnesses who may have committed a crime. It can be proved with more certainty than So did eyewitnesses to the actual act. States are hampered in many ways by this reasonable suspicion, and often have to do more than prove the guilt of men before they are convicted. Some say circumstantial evidence alone does not convict, but Bosch officials have shown that circumstantial evidence is the best evidence. A jury should not hesitate in the absence of hard evidence, and will only convict if the evidence is consistent with all the facts of the case. Good characters are important because they say a lot. An important detail of the document is that the defendants in this case questioned their character and the state responded with acceptance of the challenge. It is believed that the defendant was just as good a person as he was when he lived in Atlanta, but getting people to criticize someone else's character is the hardest thing for a lawyer. Note also that if the defendant's guilt is clearly established to the satisfaction of the jury, a demonstration of good character does not bar conviction. He also points out that the most difficult burden of proof is to destroy the personality of a person who is truly personable. Finally, it is noted that the accused referred to 19 or 20 fine, highly trained, working schoolgirls as scum fanatics and liars, a term they frequently spread here. . An important detail of this sentence is that, as in the Durant case, the defendant is of good character, but his guilt is clearly proven to the satisfaction of the jury. The defendant makes perjury some time later and asks the jury to convict Jim Conley if the evidence requires him to snap Jim Conley's neck. Mr. Arnold said yesterday that Mr. Jim Conley has not been charged with this offense and that unless there is evidence other than that presented here or previously presented, the jury will seek another He said an attorney general should be elected. An important detail of this document is that if a person's personality is questioned and the state cannot do so, it is the defendant's responsibility. Direct questioning must relate to general reputation, whether good or bad, and cross-examination may involve specific transactions or statements made by the individual under investigation. Defendant suspended a witness and introduced him to a jury, putting his character in such a situation. This showed that the defendant needs a conscience, and that Leo M. Frank would not have been so relieved if he had contributed to putting the noose around Jim Conley's neck for the crimes he committed. ⁣The most important detail in the document is that witnesses were called to refute the case, but they dared not cross-examine them. Statement of the Good People Associated with the Hebrew Orphanage, Dr. Marks and Dr. Sun showed that they knew the Leo M. Frank character as well as they did. The speaker also suggested that if someone is accused of a crime and their character is questioned, they may be able to force others to do what they want. The speaker believes the proposal is an insidious one and the problem with the deal is that there are too many gimmicks and not enough honest and clear business. The speaker believes the problem with this business is that there are too many gimmicks and not enough honest and outspoken business. The most important detail of the document is that three talented lawyers and an innocent man who worked in a factory and over twenty girls were in court, the man was character in terms of lust and uncontrollable passion. It is a testimony that it is bad. I had poor Mary Phagan killed. The book states that it is permissible to cross-examine a witness to find out who told them these things, and that the issue is of intrinsic importance and contradicts a person's innocence. I'm here. The main detail in this document is that the well had a leak and little Miss Jackson let it out. A man, the factory manager, who wants to ban flirting, spied on the schoolgirls and told them to go to the girls' locker room. Old Jim Conley claims that someone who worked upstairs went up there, but Mr. Ruben B. Arnold said that was a lie and called them gruesome fanatics. Evidence suggests the man was staying in a room on the fourth floor with a working woman. Now he works there and who still has the courage to come here and talk? The most important detail in this document is that the defendant went to the pencil factory and met with the woman on the fourth floor. Their witness, Miss Jackson, said she heard him enter there three or four times more often than she had ever seen, and they complained to the four women. On August 23, the judge ruled that defendant was not of good character and that the attorney's conduct in the case contradicted defendant's claim that he was of good character. The judge also said the defendant had the right to ask the girls where they got their information from and why they didn't do it when the defendant was a bad guy. ⁣The most important details in this text are that the testimony of the good people living out on Washington Street connected with the Hebrew Orphans Home, Dr. Marks, Dr. Sun, and all the other people running with Dr. Jekyll don't know the character of Mr. Hyde, and that Dr. Marks didn't call Dr. Sun down to the factory on Saturday evenings to show what he was going to do with those girls. The text also mentions that the trouble about this business is that there is too much shenanigans and too little honest, plain dealings. Finally, the text mentions that Dr. Marks, Dr. Sun, and all the other people running with Dr. Jekyll don't know the character of Mr. Hyde, and that they didn't call Dr. Marks down to the factory on Saturday evenings to show what he was going to do with those girls. The most important details in this text are that three able counsel and an innocent man and 20 or more girls, all of whom had worked in the factory but none of whom work there at this time, tell the court that the man had a bad character for Lasciviousness, the uncontrolled and uncontrollable passion that led him on to kill poor Mary Phagan. This book says it is allowable to cross examine a witness to see and find out what he knows, who told him those things. Three capable lawyers, an innocent man and over 20 girls, all worked in that factory, but none of them worked in the factory at the time, but in court, the man was amorous. He testified that he had an uncontrollable and uncontrollable passion. He made him kill poor Mary Phagan. Old Jim Conley may not have been so wrong when he thought someone was working his fourth floor. The most important details in this document are the testimony of those who believe the man was in the fourth floor room with the woman, and the testimony of the woman who now works there. Her witness, Miss Jackson, said she complained to the four women after hearing they were in there three to four times more often than she had seen him. Perhaps it was right there on Saturday night when he visited the woman on the fourth floor that old Jim Conley was said to have met. Mr. Dorsey had just finished saying what he wanted to say about the person question yesterday. An important detail in the document is that the defendant has not been shown to be a person of good character, and that the conduct of the attorneys in this case in failing to cross-examine twenty young women indicates that the defendant was of good character. It denies the defendant's allegation that he was a person of character. Moreover, one agency said that whenever someone has evidence but does not provide it, the presumption is strongest that having it is harmful. Because common sense dictates that whenever a person is able to give evidence and knows if they have it, the strongest suspicion arises against that person. ⁣The most important details in this text are that the able counsel didn't ask the hairbrained fanatics before they had ever gone on the stand, and that the poor, unprotected working girls from Washington Street had no interest in the case and were not under the influence of the pencil company or Montague. The speaker believes that the poor, unprotected working girls have no interest in the case and are not under the influence of the pencil company or Montague, and that they know that the man is of bad character. He has a reputation for good conduct only among those people that don't know his character. The most important details in this text are that David of Old was a great character until he put old Uriah in the forefront of battle, Judas Ascariat was a good character until he took the 30 pieces of silver and betrayed our Lord Jesus Christ, Benedict Arnold was brave and enjoyed the confidence of all the people and those in charge of the management of the Revolutionary War, until he betrayed his country, and Oscar Wilde was an Irish knight, a literary man, brilliant, the author of works that will go down the ages, Lady Windermere's Fan De Profundis, which he wrote well confined in jail. He had the affrontery, boldness, and coolness of a pervert, and when the Marquis of Queensbury saw that there was something wrong between him and his son, he sued the Marquis for damages which brought retaliation on the part of the Marquis for criminal practices on the part of Wilde. The test will continue to be the subject of research by lawyers and people interested in perverts like this guy. An important detail in this document is that Mr. Abe Roof of San Francisco, of the same race and religion, respected and respected the city's leaders, but he was skeptical of Schmidt and all that fell into his hands. It means that they have fallen. Durant was a man with such a reputation that people appointed him head of the community, but despite that reputation he did not have a steadfast character, and when he got fed up with his wife, she shot her in the bathtub. All these men, formerly of good character, were convicted as self-confessed perverts and died of old age. The most important detail of this text is the case of Richardson of Boston and Beatty of Richmond. Richardson was a pastor trusted by his congregation, but he murdered a poor girl due to an affair. After his sentencing, he hoped and granted the governor to save his life. Beatty was a wealthy man who shot and killed his wife, the mother of his 12-month-old baby, in a car. He was cool and composed, but joked too much, detectives were reprimanded and slandered, and black money was used in defense to save him from the gallows. Both cases demonstrate the importance of doing one's duty and the bravery of jurors and the Governor of Massachusetts. ⁣The most important details in this text are that an alibi is a defense that involves the impossibility of the prisoner's presence at the scene of the offense at the time of its commission. This defense involves the impossibility of the prisoner's presence at the scene of the offense at the time of its commission, and the range of evidence must be such as to exclude the possibility of guilt and the burden of carrying. An alibi is worse than no defense at all, as it involves the impossibility of proving that the prisoner was at the prayer meeting where he wasn't to show that he wasn't at the crap game where he was. This man never made an admission from the beginning until the end of this case except he knew that someone could fasten it on him wherever he knew that people knew he was in the factory. The most important details in this text are that the witness, the daughter of a man who works for Montague, swore that she saw the murderer at Alabama and abroad at 110, but the paper containing her admission made in the presence of her attorney Monday morning, April 28, states that she didn't leave the factory until 1:10. The witness also claims that she had never seen the murderer at Alabama and abroad at 1:10, and that she had never seen him at Jacob's at Jacob's. The witness also claims that she saw the murderer at Jacob's at 110, but the paper containing her admission made in the presence of her attorney Monday morning, April 28, states that she had never seen him at Alabama and abroad at 1:10. The witness also claims that she saw the murderer at Jacob's at 1:10, but the paper containing her admission made in the presence of her attorney Monday morning, April 28, states that she had never seen him at Alabama and abroad at 1:10. Finally, the witness claims that she saw the murderer at Jacob's at 1:10, but the paper containing her admission made in the presence of her attorney Monday morning, April 28, states that she had never seen The most important details in this text are the speech of a lawyer to whom Arnold and Rosser would have pulled off their hats in admiration for his intellect and character. Daniel Webster's great speech in the Nap case states that time is identical and its subdivisions are all alike, and that no man knows one day from another or 1 hour from another, but by some fact connected with it. As Old Shinyontog warned, the evidence has been twisted and altered to support this man's alibi claim. For example, here we find out that Frank has arrived at the factory. The most important detail in this document is that Frank arrived in Montagu at 8:30 am. At thirty he borrowed a raincoat from his brother-in-law, Frau Ulsenbach. Maddy Smith left the building at 9 a.m. Frank calls Schiff to come to his office at 10:00am. At 11 o'clock, Frank returns to the pencil factory, where he dictates mail and signs letters. Frank states in his statement that he will arrive at Montagu every hour, every minute, at this hour. ⁣The most important details in this text are that Mary Phagan arrived 10 or 15 minutes after Miss Hall left the factory, and that Lemme Quinn arrived not on the minute, but to serve their purposes from 1220 to 1222. This contradicts the evidence of Freeman and the other young lady who placed Quinn in the factory before that time, which was after they had eaten lunch and about to pay their fare before they ever saw Quinn at the little cafe, the Busy Bee. Mr. Arnold believes that if a crowd of people laugh every time they say anything, how are they to hear the court? He is going to interrupt him on every substantial one he makes. Mr. Dorsey is accused of perjury in a case involving a woman who was killed by a man she saw before twelve and before he left at 01:00. Mr. Arnold suggests that the woman runs under the bank, but she takes the bait and runs under the bank. Mr. Dorsey then comes back at her again to show how she turned a turtle. He then accuses the people of Georgia and Fulton County and of Atlanta of suffering an innocent girl`s death at the hands of a man like this and then turning him loose on such evidence as this. Mr. Dorsey then compares the circumstances of the case to those of Newt to Lee and Gantt, and concludes that they had only weak and flimsy circumstances against them. He then asks why they didn't take New to Lee and Gantt, as they had only weak and flimsy circumstances against them. The most important details in this audiobook are that circumstantial evidence is just as good as any other kind when it is the right kind, and that Newt Lee has a strong case of circumstantial evidence against him. This evidence is in black and white, committed in the presence of the jury after he had already said that he wrote the financial sheet Saturday morning and at his suggestion, he turned around and swore to the contrary. Schiff claims that he went home and slept all day and didn't get up what he called the dutta. He may have the nerve of an Oscar Wild, but if it did, it wouldn't prove anything. He may have been cool when nobody was there to accuse him. Frank was a college graduate, head of the B'nai B'rith, and the head of the B'nai B'rith. He spent his Saturday afternoons using the data Schiff provided him when he could do it in the morning. Miss Fleming told the truth that she didn't stay there very often on Saturday afternoon. Frank could have fixed up that financial sheet Saturday morning without Schiff having furnished the data if he hadn't been suspecting an accusation of murdering that little girl. A man of Frank's type could easily have fixed that financial sheet a thing he did 52 times a year for five or six years and could have betrayed no nervousness. He may have written so as not to portray his nervousness.

We simply need to persevere and be patient in this society where Anti-gentilism's forces are enforcing an ever-increasing tyranny. With patience and perseverance, we succeed. The gloomiest moments eventually give way to dawn when the sun emerges into the brightness of day. Dr. William Pierce's lecture from 1984 was turned into a video montage in 2014 to encourage people engaged in the epic fight to free the west from its insurmountable foes behind the gates. The perpetual enemies of the West are always pushing for their censorship and globalist cancel culture, so we ask that you download and publish this movie to as many media sharing services as you can. Through their political pressure organizations, the anti-gentiles are able to get material prohibited in over 30 countries, exposing them for the pathological liars and worldwide mafia that they have always been historically.

Exploring one of Judaism's core taboos with bracing humor and insight, Yoav Shamir investigates whether or not modern-day anti-Semitism should be viewed as an ongoing threat and whether right-wing Zionists are known for using scare tactics as a way to invalidate their opponents. Through discussions with a diverse range of individuals from across the political spectrum (including a prominent member and critic of the Anti-defamation league), visits to sites like Auschwitz accompanied by Israeli students and exploration into reports on acts against Jewish people in Brooklyn; Shamir uncovers present-day realities regarding anti-Semitism. Shockingly and amusingly enough, his conclusions were quite enlightening. What the Critics are Saying "An incredibly bold and brave film." - Filmmaker Michael Moore "Truly courageous! Yoav Shamir IS the Israeli Michael Moore." - Time Out New York "Provocative and timely, intelligent and wry." - Leslie Felperin, Variety "Profound and passionate." - Ray Bennett, Film Journal International "This is muscular, intelligent documentary filmmaking of the first order - trenchant, controversial, riveting." - Harvey S. Karten, Compuserve "Works brilliantly! Shocking, surprisingly funny... Defamation is an education!" - Jennifer Merin, About.com "A must -see for thoughtful friends and critics of Israel." - David Lamble, Bay Area Reporter "The most important Jewish movie of the year." - Akiva Gottlieb, The Jewish Journal "Alternately sweet-tempered and outrageous... will spark long arguments deep into the night among Jewish and non-Jewish viewers alike." - Andrew O’Hehir, Salon Recommended Reading Beyond Chutzpah: On the Misuse of Anti-Semitism and the Abuse of History by Norman Finkelstein Anti-Semitism: Myth and Hate from Antiquity to the Present by Marvin Perry and Frederick Schweitzer The Israel Lobby and U.S. Foreign Policy by John Mearsheimer and Stephen Walt The Deadliest Lies: The Israel Lobby and the Myth of Jewish Control by Abraham Foxman Links See details about this film's theatrical run. www.defamation-thefilm.com Tribeca '09 Interview with Yoav Shamir on IndieWIRE Read Yoav Shamir's response to David Hirsh in The Guardian, 1/25/10

Within the third and final installment of the arrangement on Pontius Pilate and the Jews, we witness Nicodemus, a part of the notorious Sanhedrin and a Pharisee, guideline Pontius Pilate on how to effectively contrive against Jesus Christ. The Jewish Tall Cleric board habitually acted autonomously of the Romans and rendered choices without the endorsement of the Central Government. They used impressive control and habitually opposed Roman orders. This incorporates carrying out extra-judicial deaths without the endorsement of the Romans, who ruled the world at the time. As a result, they worked as a state inside a state, as well as a fifth column. Moreover, these Jewish elites were all related to one another in an amplified family organize. We utilize the term "mishpucka" in present day speech to demonstrate comparative shapes of ethnic and familial association and organizing. Jesus in the long run surrenders to Roman specialists within the course of the story, and beneath the weight of the Pharisees and Sanhedrin, he is attempted and found blameworthy in a kangaroo court. Jesus wasn't power-hungry or materialistic just like the Jews who attempted to slaughter him, so he didn't intellect being executed. Nicodemus recognized that Jesus was a fair man and that it was evil to put him to passing by torturous killing, but he was feeble to halt it. The Pharisees and the Sanhedrin's political authority were debilitated by Jesus' otherworldly lessons. That's why it was vital to induce freed of him. The Jews to begin with expecting to trial and execute Jesus in one of their possess Kangaroo courts, casting him as an outsider - now not a Judean. Be that as it may, this would uncover them as puppeteers, and the Romans as subservient to or controlled by them. Not as it were that, but the Jews would possibly shakedown or debilitate Pontius Pilate with traitorousness to the Sovereign on the off chance that he did not carry out the execution of Jesus for the gathered wrongdoing of conspiracy against the State. Pontius couldn't reveal a scrap of confirmation against Jesus for bad form, but he was willing to convict him for a much lesser wrongdoing in arrange to conciliate the Jews' bloodlust and perniciousness. Concurring to Pontus Pilate, he was so horrified by the Jews' activities that he chose to wash his hands actually and customarily some time recently Christ was executed in arrange to mean his hands as being clean of the violations of unreasonably rebuffing an blameless man. Jesus was apparently whipped some time recently being executed on a cross. The watches who were implied to keep vigil over the grave were taken aback when Jesus was said to have vanished from the tomb by Saturday morning. The watches claimed they had been on obligation all night observing the grave, but it showed up to Pontius Pilate that Divine Mediation had happened since the huge stone with ropes around it, which was moreover blocking the entrance to the grave, had been rolled over within the morning and Jesus' body had vanished. It's odd that Pontius Pilate characterized Jesus' physical characteristics as not Jewish, but or maybe a mixed or blended Greek-type.

This is the second portion of the book "Pontius Pilate and the Jews". Judahites and Edomite Jews both have isolated parentages and quality pools. The Edomite Jews had subverted Judea by the time Pontius Pilate had arrived by collaborating with the Roman occupation. These Edomite Jews were saddling Jews by constrain from all over the world indeed as distant absent as Afghanistan and Persia (past the Euphrates). Financiers are as a rule paid charges by the Jews for the upkeep of the sanctuary. The charges ought to be paid deliberately and not by constrain. The normal Judahites were careless to the truth that Edomite Jews had taken over their communities. The devour of Passover, as celebrated by the old Israelite Judahites is clarified by Pontius Pilate. It begins on the night of the 13th of Nissan from where not a single article of raised bread can be permitted to be found and the head of each family must make beyond any doubt it's all been evacuated. Within the morning time all the metal utensils are plunged in bubbling water for refinement and after that in cold water for washing. Press vessels are made ruddy hot and burnt in arrange to be completely purified. Individual cleanliness is upheld by cutting the hair, clipping the nails, and taking a shower which is unordinary for a individuals that have at first been messy and smudged all through recorded history. Minister Eli James proceeds on perusing the depictions given by Pontius Pilate around the (mis)-conduct of the Jews amid their celebrations. Pontus Pilate proceeds on with the entry of Jesus and the different legends encompassing his marvelous birth are brought to account. There are treasure troves of data within the moment portion of this book. Proceed observing the video over to find more approximately Pontius Pilate and his relationship with the Jews of his realm.

Pastor Eli James begins with the observation that Jews have never shown allegiance to any country in which they lived, from the Roman Empire to the Soviet Union of the past, and/or the United States of America today. . The US media are complicit in distorting the real situation in the Middle East in favor of Israel. It is known that Jews despise Christians and use them as tools. Jews are believed to be hiring Christians to destroy Christianity. He further argues that Jews are like oil, Christians are like water, and that the two will never meet, the former will rise to dominate the latter. The pastor went on to claim that 24 Jewish families demanded temple funds that were supposed to be used for the purpose and were instead used to make themselves rich, claiming that Jews were also exempt. He claimed that he had deceived people, including Jews. Jews were also considered spendthrifts and gluttons. Pilate is said to have endured as long as he could, but they were beyond their limits. He then confiscated all funds sent by the Jewish diaspora to the Pharisee-controlled city of Jerusalem. The Jews did not like foreign non-Jews living in Palestine, but they had no problem settling in other parts of the Roman Empire, especially in wealthy cities where they could engage in banking and other commercial activities. Jews were also active in the academic world in the ancient Roman Empire. The Jews were known to support revolts against the Roman Empire, and Pontius Pilate saw them as a threat that would cause immense grief if not fought carefully. Pontius Pilate was furious with the Jewish Supreme Court and the Sanhedrin for crucifying Jesus Christ. The Jews had studied the Talmud with great zeal, but with an emphasis on legality and no sense of artistry or creativity. During Pontius Pilate's reign, ethnic tensions arose between his two groups of Jews. Herodian Edomites or Pharisees, and Israelite Jews. According to Reverend Eli James, all imperial problems go back to the Edomites and Pharisees of the Herodian dynasty, not to ordinary Israeli-Jewish Jews.

William Luther Pierce, Chairman of the National Alliance states that the suicide of the white race has begun. Even though Europeans ruled the world unequivocally, they ended up dying off due to the Jewish infiltration of their lands. Europeans ruled the world culturally, economically, militarily, politically, and scientifically unlike any other race in the history of mankind. Everything was superior about them.

Everyone seems to go after wealth, enjoyment, and comfort. Life was much more difficult in the past and these things weren't considered as important to them as people in modern civilization seem to think it does. Our ancestors were much more in tune with nature and the reality around them instead of the temporary illusion that modern humans are currently facing. In the past, our ancestors wanted to be remembered for living a meaningful life. It meant participating to the fullest extent of their capabilities. Since death was an everyday reality for them, they considered it important to give meaning to their lives. Jews and their non-White foot soldiers are causing trouble for America and thereby taking everything to the ground that the ancestors of modern White Americans fought to build. William Luther Pierce tells young people to take responsibility for their lives instead of being apathetic and fatalistic.

William Luther Pierce in this video shows Winston Churchill Expounding Bolshehvism during his early days as a politician. Winston Churchill was initially outspoken against Communism. On February 8th 1920, Winston Churchill stated on the "Illustrated Sunday Herald" that "This movement among the Jews is not new. From the days of Spartacus-Weishaupt to those of Karl Marx, and down to Trotsky (Russia), Bela Kun (Hungary), Rosa Luxembourg (Germany), and Emma Goldman (United States), this world-wide conspiracy for the overthrow of civilization and for the reconstitution of society on the basis of arrested development, of envious malevolence, and impossible equality, has been steadily growing. It played, as a modern writer, Mrs. Webster, has so ably shown, a definitely recognizable part in the tragedy of the French Revolution. It has been the mainspring of every subversive movement during the Nineteenth Century; and now at last this band of extraordinary personalities from the underworld of the great cities of Europe and America have gripped the Russian people by the hair of their heads and have become practically the undisputed masters of that enormous empire. There is no need to exaggerate the part played in the creation of Bolshevism and in the actual bringing about of the Russian Revolution by these international and for the most part atheistical Jews. It is certainly a very great one; it probably outweighs all others. . With the notable exception of Lenin, the majority of the leading figures are Jews. Moreover, the principal inspira­tion and driving power comes from the Jewish leaders. Thus Tchitcherin, a pure Russian, is eclipsed by his nominal subordinate Litvinoff, and the influence of Russians like Bukharin or Lunacharski cannot be compared with the power of Trotsky, or of Zinovieff, the Dictator of the Red Citadel (Petrograd), or of Krassin or Radek – all Jews. In the Soviet institutions the predominance of Jews is even more astonishing. And the prominent, if not indeed the principal, part in the system of terrorism applied by the Extra­ordinary Commissions for Combating Counter-Revolution (the TCHEKA) has been taken by Jews, and in some notable cases by Jewesses."

William Luther Pierce, the Chairman of the National Alliance, does a fabulous expose of the Talmud. He tells of their tribal dominance due to their belief in the tribal god Yahweh. The Gentiles shall always be the servants of the Jews according to the Talmud. The Jews shall always suck the milk out of the Gentiles and thereby parasites. According to their book, the Jews have a special nature and status who must rule the earth. This is according to their Talmud which allegedly provides the correct interpretation and implementation of the Torah. The Talmud exposes the perpetual and murderous hatred that the Jews have on the Gentiles. The same evil prominence was obtained by Jews in the brief period of terror during which Bela Kun ruled in Hungary. The same phenomenon has been presented in Germany (especially in Bavaria), so far as this madness has been allowed to prey upon the temporary prostration of the German people. Although in all these coun­tries there are many non-Jews every whit as bad as the worst of the Jewish revolutionaries, the part played by the latter in proportion to their numbers in the population is astonishing.

This film is a compilation of clips showing the Jewish control of the banks, mass media and politics. Jewish Bankers steal the wealth of the public while the Jewish-owned media promotes degeneracy and Jewish-controlled politicians promote uncontrolled immigration while Israel demands that it remains a Jewish-majority state. Dr. David Duke exposes how uncontrolled third world immigration initiated by Jewish handlers such as Barbara Spectre is being hidden by the Jewish-owned media. He suggests a revolution is necessary. The revolution doesn't have to be violent. The American people backed by the US military will be able to get rid of the Jewish criminals and supremacists ruining the United States. That will be the apex of the highest ideal - removing the Jewish presence in order to preserve a future and legacy for your children.

The anonymous narrator asks the rhetorical question regarding the fear that some people have about facts related to the Jews and then lists out many truths regarding the involvement of this particular ethnic group in various world events throughout history. The best example of this is when he lists Winston Churchill as accusing the Jews being behind the overthrow of Western civilization through the implementation of Bolshevism. The narrator then makes the connection between Communism and the Russian revolution and Judaism and the Jewish people using testimonies and quotes from the Jews themselves.

Dr. William Luther Pierce asks the rhetorical and thought-provoking question regarding what is the most important thing in an individual's life. Is it money and fame? Is it happiness and security? Especially financial security? However, for others, there are way more important things in life. This includes beauty and responsibility. However, today's youths are all about "feeling good" but that isn't as important as doing good deeds with an important purpose in life. It is the sacrifice that one needs to endure in order to make a better world for everyone - especially the future generations of White Western civilization.

William Luther Pierce discusses how there was a time back in the day when there were no racial aliens and the Jews were kept in their ghettos. Despite occasional differences, there weren't all the excessive challenges that Europeans and White North Americans have to face like they do today. Despite the occasional fraternal bloodshed between Europeans, things were still going well until the Jews were emancipated from their ghettos. That is when all the troubles began. It all started through massive brainwashing via Academia and Mass Media. However, the groundwork was laid earlier when non-Whites were brought over as slaves and servants thereby taking up the living space of Europeans and European North-Americans. When Jews unleashed communism, the committed genocide against Eastern European Christians. In Canada and the United States, the Jews couldn't take over through communism but they did take over through the control of media and subverted all the major institutions. Thus, millions of White Americans were brainwashed through propaganda. Jews opened the floodgates for immigrants to enter the Western world.

This short clip does a quick recap of the main concepts laid out in the Talmud including important definitions and the instructions on how Jewish supremacists must deal with non-Jews (i.e. Gentiles). The Talmud is quoted stating explicitly that non-Jews can be murdered and/or robbed without any repercussions. The Choszen Hamiszpat, Gad. Shad., Hadarine, Hilkkoth Akum Xi, Sanhedrin, Shulchan Aruch/Johre Dea, Szaalot-Utszabot, The Book of Jore Dia 17, and Tospoth Yebamoth commentaries and quotes of various rabbis over the millenia are included.

Dr. William Luther, the Chairman of the National Alliance begins the video by stating that it's not just the Jewish elite that are a source of problems for White Western civilization and society. He doesn't mean just the Jewish media bosses or their elites but rather their collective presence is problematic and source of all the misfortune in Western culture and society. They are a tribal people who are a threat to the existence of White Western civilization. The religious White Christians sheeple will state that the Jesus was a Jew and God his father was a Jew. Therefore, God's Chosen people need to be obeyed whenever required by good and righteous Christians. As for secular white western sheeple, their argument will claim that if it weren't for Einstein, Freud, or Salk, we wouldn't have modern Western civilization. The first is allegedly credited with the American Space Program, the latter with modern Psychology, and the last one allegedly provided mankind with Vaccines against Polio. However, the truth is that Einstein wasn't involved in the Space Program until the very end. Rather it was non-Jewish Pioneers, Scientists, Thinkers, and Visionaries like the German Herman Oberth and the Russian Konstantin Tsiolkovsky were involved demonstrated the feasibility of space travel in the early part of the last century. John Salk was a part of a team who took the credit of other scientists as well as his own. Sigmeund Freud only got famous cause of his Jewishness and his theories which were constantly obsessed with genitalia and sex. Rather, Freud damaged the development of the Western understanding of human psychology. Einstein only became famous because of his Jewishness despite having allegedly been a "mathematical genius". Regardless of the few good things a few Jews may have done, they have done far worse damage to Western civilization. This includes genocidal anti-Gentile, anti-European, anti-White mass murderers and revolutionaries like Lazar Kaganovich and Ilya Ehrenburg. Israeli Jewish slave dealers have sold countless Eastern European Christian women into prostitution.

At the University of Illinois in Urbana-Champaign, Revilo Pendleton Oliver taught Spanish, Italian, and Classical philology from July 7, 1908, until his death on August 20, 1994. He contributed to the National Review after the Second World War. The Revilo Pendleton In the vicinity of Corpus Christi, Texas, Oliver was born in 1908. Illinois provided the setting for his two years of high school. After once needing hospitalization "for one of the first mastoidectomies performed as more than a daring experiment", he disliked the harsh winters and moved to California to study Sanskrit. Later, he found a Hindu missionary to tutor him, and he used Max Müller's manuals and Monier Williams' grammar. As a teenager, he enjoyed watching preachers "pitch the woo at the simple-minded," going to see Aimee Semple McPherson and Katherine Tingley perform. When he was sixteen years old, he enrolled in Pomona College in Claremont, California. Oliver got married to Grace Needham in 1930. He returned to Illinois to study under William Abbott Oldfather at the University of Illinois. In 1938, the University of Illinois published Mricchakatika (The Little Clay Cart), an annotated translation from Sanskrit. In 1940, he earned his PhD. Niccol Perotti's Translations of the Enchiridion (republished in 1954 as Niccolo Perotti's Version of Epictetus' Enchiridion, with an Introduction and List of Perotti's Writings) was issued by the University the same year. As a teenager, he enjoyed hearing preachers "pitch the woo at the simple-minded," going to see Aimee Semple McPherson and Katherine Tingley perform. He enrolled at Pomona College in Claremont, California, when he was sixteen years old. Oliver married Grace Needham in 1930. He returned to Illinois to study under William Abbott Oldfather at the University of Illinois. The University of Illinois released Mricchakatika (The Little Clay Cart), an annotated translation from Sanskrit, in 1938. He obtained his PhD in 1940. The same year, the University released Niccolo Perotti's Translations of the Enchiridion (reprinted in 1954 as Niccolo Perotti's Version of Epictetus' Enchiridion, with an Introduction and List of Perotti's Writings).

Dr. William Luther Pierce, the Chairman of the National Alliance, states that the Jews are not only the source of the misfortunes of White Western civilization and society on an elite level but rather collectively. The whole tribe is considered to be the source of the misfortune of Western nations. He denies the Christian claim that Jesus was Jewish and thereby God is Jewish which implies that Christians need to be subservient to the Jews in totality. Jews are God's people according to these types of Christians. On the secular end of the spectrum, the pro-Jewish claim is that Einstein, Freud, and Salk were Jewish.

Dr. William Luther Pierce extrapolates the various reasons as to why marriages are failing in the current day and age. He pin points three root causes towards the decline of modern marriages - economic, psychological, and social. Historically, marriage was based on the economic fact that a well-defined division of labour increased the chances of survivability. If a man and/or woman complemented with each other, they and their offspring were likely to survive and prosper. However, causal factors like two economic developments between the early 20th and 21st centuries had undermined the development of the human species in regards to marriage and family bonds. The first was the large-scale recruitment of married women into the domestic workforce during the last century whilst the latter was the development of the welfare state. This increased the labour pool and decreased the wages while the rise of the service economy decreased the percentage of jobs that required a man's strength. Technology was reducing the burden of maintaining a home. Women were no longer economically dependent on their husbands as in the past. Women could find employment if they left their husbands. Women's roles and responsibilities had diminished and the modern welfare state enabled that as well. Social changes also worked towards the detriment of marriage. The rise of feminism and women's liberation damaged marriage. Feminism reduced the complementary relationship between men and women. Equality between men and women was promoted thereby creating a gender dystopia thereby wrecking marriage. The only way to save marriage would be to eradicate propaganda encouraging women to go out and work or even provide them with affirmative action thereby snatching jobs away from men. The institution of marriage can only be saved if children are being produced and raised otherwise the trajectory for the future means the destruction of the family unit.

Haiti, previously known as Saint-Domingue and administered by the French, was the most opulent colony in the New World in the 18th century. Its extremely fertile soil created an abundance of crops, attracting thousands of White French settlers. Unfortunately, African black slaves were introduced to assist with the job. The craziness of the French Revolution, with its truly insane notion of racial equality, gripped many Frenchmen in the late 1700s, and the Black plantation laborers were encouraged to revolt. When they did, they mercilessly slaughtered every white man, woman, and child in the colony and declared Haiti a republic. What had been the richest and most productive portion of the New World quickly reverted to an African level of squalor, misery, and poverty. The roads and cities established by the French fell into disrepair. An unusually African blend of anarchy and authoritarianism replaced French law and order. A little more than a century later, in 1915, following an unusually chaotic and brutal time, U.S. Marines were brought into Haiti to impose order. The motivation for sending them was to protect American corporate interests in Haiti, despite President Wilson's claim that the Marines were being deployed to "bring democracy to Haiti." For 19 years, the Marines were stationed in Haiti. They not only maintained political stability, but they also built schools and hospitals, a sophisticated telephone system, and almost 1,000 miles of paved roads with 210 bridges. Haitian teachers and medics were trained by the US government. We truly provided the Haitians with a foundation for a new beginning.

jewish media control

Most people in any given society are considered to be lemmings. They can't develop independent thoughts. They conform to the behaviour of others - especially authority figures and peers. Jewish control of the media has resulted in a disaster for Western society. The only way to change the trajectory of the lemmings is to influence them into thinking that their current thought patterns are not desirable and other lemmings are also changing towards a more ideal way of thinking. This way, the Independent Thinkers can guide the lemmings in the correct direction.