jackwhitman40

In a departure from the traditional sentimentality associated with Mother's Day, former President Donald Trump used the occasion to launch a scathing attack on his political adversaries, leaving his wife Melania noticeably absent from his message. The controversial statement, shared on his social media platform Truth Social, stirred further division in an already polarized political climate. In his characteristically bombastic style, Trump extended Mother's Day wishes to "ALL, in particular the Mothers, Wives, and Lovers of the Radical Left Fascists, Marxists, and Communists." Instead of expressing gratitude and appreciation, he seized the opportunity to criticize those he perceives as undermining the nation. Taking a direct aim at his left-leaning foes, Trump implored the women in their lives to exert their influence, stating, "Please make these complete Lunatics and Maniacs Kinder, Gentler, Softer, and, most importantly, Smarter, so that we can, quickly, MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!!!" The absence of any mention of Melania Trump, his third wife and the mother of their 17-year-old son Barron, did not go unnoticed. Critics argue that the omission is indicative of the strained relationship between the couple, adding fuel to existing rumors of discord within their marriage. This divisive Mother's Day message from Trump is emblematic of his unorthodox communication style, often characterized by brashness and an inclination towards confrontation. While his supporters may appreciate his boldness, others view it as a missed opportunity to honor the significance of motherhood and promote unity during a day intended to celebrate and appreciate mothers. Subscribe for more content like this. The reaction to Trump's statement was swift and varied. Supporters applauded his outspoken nature and perceived dedication to his political cause. Conversely, opponents criticized his choice to inject political rhetoric into a day meant for appreciation and familial harmony. Critics argue that the polarizing tone of Trump's message further exacerbates the deep political divisions that have marked his tenure as president and continue to shape public discourse. Mother's Day, they contend, should be a time to set aside differences and unite in celebrating the influential women in our lives. The incident highlights the ongoing debate surrounding Trump's public persona and his approach to political communication. His use of social media platforms to bypass traditional channels has been a defining feature of his political career, allowing him to directly connect with his base while often disregarding conventional decorum. As Mother's Day serves as an opportunity to express love, appreciation, and unity, Trump's provocative message has reignited debates about the appropriate use of public platforms and the role of leaders in promoting civility and respect. It also raises questions about the state of his relationship with Melania, leaving observers speculating about the dynamics within their marriage. In the end, Trump's Mother's Day message has once again underscored the divisive nature of his political rhetoric. As the nation grapples with ongoing challenges, the need for unity and empathy becomes increasingly important, even on occasions intended for celebration and reflection. Whether this latest episode will have any lasting impact on public perception or political discourse remains to be seen. Nevertheless, it serves as a reminder of the enduring impact of presidential communication and the power of words to shape public opinion. As the country moves forward, it is crucial to remember the importance of respectful dialogue and the capacity for leaders to inspire unity rather than division, even during politically charged occasions such as Mother's Day. Thanks for watching, subscribe to our channel for authenticity. (By Mehwish)

(By Mehwish)

(By Mehwish)

As Title 42 draws to its scheduled close, House Republicans are planning to vote on border security legislation criticized by the U.S. bishops. Title 42, a part of federal U.S. public health law, has granted the federal government some authority to implement emergency action to prevent the spread of contagious diseases by blocking some individuals from entering the country at borders or other ports of entry. However, the policy has been controversial since its implementation in 2020, as it was seen as part of the Trump administration’s broader attempts to reduce migration rather than evidence-based virus mitigation. Since it was implemented at the start of the pandemic, Title 42 has been invoked more than 2.7 million times to expel migrants, including those seeking asylum, according to U.S. Customs and Border Protection data. Border security and immigration have become some of the most divisive policy issues in American politics. Republicans have made what they characterize as lax border policies among their key points of criticism of President Joe Biden. Subscribe for more content like this. As the policy's end date nears, House Republicans are expected to pass HR 2, the Secure the Border Act of 2023, an immigration bill that would codify many of Trump’s immigration policies, including the so-called “Remain in Mexico” policy requiring migrants to stay in Mexico while they appeal their cases in the United States. The package is not expected to be considered by the Senate, which is in Democratic control. Bishop Mark J. Seitz of El Paso, Texas, chairman of the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops’ Committee on Migration, sent a letter urging lawmakers to oppose the bill and “to support the drafting of bipartisan legislation that is more in keeping with our nation’s rich tradition of welcome.” Bishop Seitz argued that the bill “would endanger unaccompanied children and inflict harm on other vulnerable persons, decimate access to asylum, mandate damaging detention and removal practices, restrict access to legal employment, limit — and potentially eliminate — federal partnerships with faith-based and other nongovernmental organizations (NGOs), undermine the rule of law, and more.” The USCCB has been an outspoken advocate for the rights of immigrants and refugees, emphasizing the moral obligation to welcome and protect them. In their statement, they stressed the importance of addressing the root causes of migration, including poverty, violence, and political instability, and urged Congress to pursue comprehensive immigration reform that would provide a pathway to citizenship for undocumented immigrants and strengthen protections for refugees and asylum seekers. Thanks for watching, subscribe to our channel for authenticity. (By Mehwish)

CNN hosted a town hall with former President Donald Trump on Wednesday night in New Hampshire, where he took questions from New Hampshire Republicans and undeclared voters who plan to vote in the 2024 GOP presidential primary about a wide range of issues. However, Trump used the platform to make many false and unsubstantiated claims about the 2020 election, violence on January 6, 2021, the economy, and his handling of records after leaving the White House. The most prominent of these claims was Trump's insistence that the 2020 election was "rigged." This is not only a false claim but also one that has been repeatedly debunked. Trump lost the 2020 election to Biden fair and square, 306 to 232 in the Electoral College. Subscribe for more content like this. Biden earned more than 7 million more votes than Trump did. Trump's own campaign and senior officials in his administration found no evidence for his claims of widespread fraud. Yet, he continues to repeat the lie, fueling mistrust in the American electoral system. Trump also made claims about voter ID laws, saying "We should have voter ID." However, it is misleading at best for Trump to claim that voter ID doesn't currently exist in US elections. In fact, most states require some form of identification before casting ballots. The remaining states that don't require ID have other methods to prevent fraud, like signature checks. Thanks for watching, subscribe to our channel for authenticity. (By Mehwish)

(By Mehwish)

(By Mehwish)

New York Republican Congressman George Santos has pleaded not guilty to 13 federal charges, including allegations of fraud related to Covid-19 unemployment benefits, misusing campaign funds, and lying about his personal finances on House disclosure reports. Santos was released on a $500,000 bond, according to the US Attorney's Office in New York. He was ordered to surrender his passport and will need permission to travel outside of Washington, DC, New York City, and Long Island. The charges inject fresh uncertainty into the political future of Santos, a freshman congressman whose astonishing pattern of lies and fabrications stunned even hardened politicos and led top Democrats and some New York Republicans to call for his resignation earlier this year. The congressman said on Wednesday that he will not resign from his seat and that he still plans to seek reelection next year. Santos appeared in a federal court on Long Island on Wednesday. He has been charged with seven counts of wire fraud, three counts of money laundering, one count of theft of public funds, and two counts of making materially false statements to the House of Representatives. In a combative, impromptu press conference after his arraignment, Santos said that he has been "compliant throughout this entire process" but blasted the indictment as a "witch hunt" and said he will "fight my battle." Subscribe for more content like this. Prosecutors allege Santos, 34, solicited campaign funds under false pretense and used them for personal expenses like designer clothing. The indictment accuses Santos of undertaking a "fraudulent political contribution solicitation scheme," alleging that he set up a company and got supporters to contribute funds to it under the false pretense that the money would benefit his political campaign. "Taken together, the allegations in the indictment charge Santos with relying on repeated dishonesty and deception to ascend to the halls of Congress and enrich himself," said US Attorney Breon Peace in a statement. "He used political contributions to line his pockets, unlawfully applied for unemployment benefits that should have gone to New Yorkers who had lost their jobs due to the pandemic, and lied to the House of Representatives." Santos, who was elected last year to represent a district that includes parts of Long Island and Queens, has been under investigation in multiple jurisdictions and by the House Ethics Committee. The congressman has admitted to making some misleading claims about his education and financial status but continues to deny the more serious allegations. He has not admitted any crimes. House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy said that he will not support Santos' reelection, telling CNN that "Santos has a lot going on. I think he has other things to focus on in his life other than running for reelection." McCarthy confirmed that if the Ethics Committee determines Santos broke the law, he would call for him to resign. The charges against Santos also come as Democrats and Republicans in the House are grappling with whether to expel another member, GOP Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene, over her past support for conspiracy theories and violence against Democrats. Thanks for watching, subscribe to our channel for authenticity. (By Mehwish)

Donald Trump’s appearance at a CNN town hall in July 2021 turned into a one-hour spectacle of lies and nonsense claims about election fraud, trade tariffs, and the January 6 insurrection. The former president spoke almost non-stop for more than five minutes, steamrolling over attempted interruptions from Kaitlan Collins, the CNN interviewer, to present his misinformation and falsehoods largely unfettered. The town hall quickly turned into a platform for Trump to spread his lies and propaganda to a crowd of supporters who laughed, cheered, and applauded his every word. The New Hampshire town hall was meant to be an opportunity for CNN to question Trump about a range of issues. Instead, it became a circus-like spectacle in which Trump mocked a sexual assault victim and spread baseless conspiracy theories about the 2020 election. CNN and Collins struggled to maintain control of the interview, and at times appeared to be powerless to prevent Trump from spewing his propaganda. Subscribe for more content like this. Trump’s claims about election fraud were particularly egregious. Despite dozens of court cases and recounts showing that the 2020 presidential election was fair and free from fraud, Trump continues to claim that he won the election and that it was stolen from him. During the town hall, he continued to spread these falsehoods, telling the audience that he had won the election “by a lot,” and that the Democrats had rigged the outcome. He also obfuscated on trade tariffs, claiming that he had won a victory over China and that the US was now “making billions” from them. In reality, the trade war with China has been costly for both countries, and many US businesses have suffered as a result. Trump also claimed, wrongly, that he had “finished” the wall between the US and Mexico, a project that remains incomplete and has been the subject of much controversy and criticism. At one point, Trump mocked E Jean Carroll, the columnist whom a New York jury found he sexually assaulted in a department store. This was a low point in an already disgraceful performance, and led to widespread condemnation from commentators and politicians. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, the New York congresswoman, tweeted her disgust with the event, saying that CNN had “lost total control” of the town hall, and that the audience was cheering Trump’s lies and misinformation. Many others expressed similar sentiments, noting that the event was a sad reflection of the state of US politics. In conclusion, Donald Trump’s appearance at the CNN town hall was a depressing reminder of the state of US politics. It showcased a former president who was willing to lie and spread misinformation without any consequences, and an audience that was happy to cheer him on. It also highlighted the difficulties that journalists face in trying to hold politicians to account in an era of rampant misinformation and propaganda. Thanks for watching, subscribe to our channel for authenticity.

(By Mehwish)

(By Mehwish)

WE DONT KNOW ITS TRUE OR NOT BUT WE ONLY KNOW THAT THIS VIDEO HAS BEEN LEAKED Thank you so much for watching To contact or business enquires:Jackwhitman600@gmail.com

Alex Sheppard 🇺🇸 on Twitter THIS IS UNWATCHABLE 🚨 CNN’s Kaitlan Collins wants to talk about RAPE | SOURCE: CNN Newsque#TrumpwasaskedifheowesPenceanapologyforJan.6.Hearhisresponse#TrumpspeakestoNewHampshirevotersatCNNTownHallevent#Trumpwon'tsaywhetherhewantsRussiaorUkrainetowinwar#TrumpappearingatCNNtownhallaftersexassaultverdict#WhyPresidentTrumpbelievesUSshoulddefaultifWhiteHousedoesn'tagreetospendingcuts#RepublicanleadersreacttoTrumpsexualabuseverdict#E.JeanCarrollTrialVerdict#TrumpReleasesVideoMessages Thank you so much for watching To contact or business enquires:Jackwhitman600@gmail.com

This CNN town hall event is a stand-up comedy show. CNN looks terrible. Newsque#TrumpTrial:Supportersreacttothesexualabuseverdict#Trump'sMostDisgustingCommentinCNNTownHall#AnalystsaysthissinglemostimportantmomentfromTrumptownhall#TrumptestsmediainCNNTownHall#mediameltdownoverTrump'sCNNTownHall#E.JeanCarrollTrialVerdict#PledgesToAppeal#TrumpReleasesVideoMessages#Trump'sCNNTownHall#Trump'sWorstLiesFromTheCNNTownHall#Trump'sMostDisgustingComment#CNNTownHall#AccessHollywood Thank you so much for watching To contact or business enquires:Jackwhitman600@gmail.com

WATCH 🚨 President Donald Trump reacts to news that Ukrainians attempted to drone strike Vladimir Putin and the Kremlin. “If I am President, I will end that war in one day. It’ll take 24 hours. I know Zelenskyy well. I know Putin well. It will be easy.” Newsque#TrumpTrial:Supportersreacttothesexualabuseverdict#Trump'sMostDisgustingCommentinCNNTownHall#AnalystsaysthissinglemostimportantmomentfromTrumptownhall#TrumptestsmediainCNNTownHall#mediameltdownoverTrump'sCNNTownHall#E.JeanCarrollTrialVerdict#PledgesToAppeal#TrumpReleasesVideoMessages#Trump'sCNNTownHall#Trump'sWorstLiesFromTheCNNTownHall#Trump'sMostDisgustingComment#CNNTownHall#AccessHollywood Newsque,Pledges To Appeal,E. Jean Carroll Trial Verdict,Hear his response,Pence an apology for Jan. 6.,Trump speaks to New Hampshire voters,Access Hollywood,Trump asked if he stands by comments,Comment in CNN Town Hall,Trump's Worst Lies From The CNN Town Hall,Trump's CNN town hall,media melt down over Trump's,AOC,Trump tests media in CNN townhall,Analyst says,most important moment,from Trump town hall,Trump's Most Disgusting,Trump Trial,sexual abuse verdict Thank you so much for watching To contact or business enquires:Jackwhitman600@gmail.com

(By Mehwish)

On May 9th, 2022, the state of Oklahoma was rocked by a brutal crime that left six people dead, including five children. The murders took place in a Henryetta home, which was later dubbed a "house of horrors." Jesse McFadden, a registered sex offender, is said to have killed his wife, Holly Guess, her children Tiffany Guess, Michael Mayo, and Rylee Allen, along with their friends, Brittany Brewer and Ivy Webster. After committing the heinous crime, McFadden turned the gun on himself. The Oklahoma State Bureau of Investigations (OSBI) has taken charge of the investigation and has been gathering evidence from the crime scene. The agents have been seen posted up at the home, collecting various items, including computers, phones, and sex and bondage items. The discovery of such items has raised alarm bells and caused concerns that McFadden may have been involved in more nefarious activities beyond the murders. Subscribe for more content like this. Cameron Spradling, the attorney for one of the victim's families, said that the computers and phones could be key to uncovering what happened and identifying more predators, potential victims, and even photos of the victims before they were killed. Spradling believes that the OSBI has taken everything from the house, including the U-Haul they brought to the scene. He expressed frustration that the crime had occurred and called it a national embarrassment. The investigation is ongoing, and officials have stated that they will be draining the ponds on the property to search for more evidence. This tragedy has shaken the Henryetta community and the state of Oklahoma as a whole. The murder of five innocent children and the discovery of disturbing items at the crime scene have left many wondering what could have been done to prevent this tragedy. It is imperative that investigators get to the bottom of this crime and bring justice to the victims and their families. The OSBI is well-equipped to handle this case, and the public is hopeful that they will find answers soon. Until then, the community will be left to mourn the loss of six lives and wonder what could have been done to prevent this tragedy. Thanks for watching, subscribe to our channel for authenticity. (By Mehwish)

(By Mehwish)

(By Mehwish)

The rape trial of former President Donald Trump brought by E. Jean Carroll, an advice columnist who accused Trump of raping her in the mid-1990s, has come to a close, and both sides have presented their final arguments. While Carroll's attorney, Roberta Kaplan, presented evidence to the jury that Trump didn't show up in court because "he knows what he did," Trump's defense attorney Joe Tacopina argued that Carroll's vagueness about the timing of the alleged attack made it difficult for his client to defend himself. The video of Trump's deposition in October was played in court, where he mistakenly identified a photo of Carroll as his second wife Marla Maples, but later said the picture was blurry. Kaplan argued that Carroll was "exactly his type" and that Trump's comment about her not being his type indicated that she wasn't attractive enough to sexually assault. Kaplan then played a portion of the Access Hollywood tape in which Trump was heard boasting about sexually assaulting women. Subscribe for more content like this. Tacopina maintained that his client denied attacking Carroll under oath and suggested that Carroll's vagueness about the timing of the alleged attack made it difficult for his client to defend himself. He also noted that Carroll's attorneys could have called Trump to testify, but they didn't. Tacopina asked the jury, "How do you prove a negative, how do you prove you didn't do it?" and questioned how Trump could defend himself against an attack that allegedly occurred on an unspecified evening in the latter part of 1995 or 1996. Carroll is suing Trump for battery and defamation, and Trump has denied the allegations. His lawyers didn't present any witnesses, and he chose not to testify in the case. The jury will now decide whether Carroll's case against Trump will go to trial, and if so, whether the former president is guilty of the charges against him. Thanks for watching, subscribe to our channel for authenticity. (By Mehwish)

Former United States President Donald Trump’s lawyer has called a rape and defamation case brought against him by writer E Jean Carroll an affront to the justice system. During closing arguments in a civil trial in Manhattan federal court, lawyer Joseph Tacopina urged jurors to reject Carroll’s effort to “profit” from a false story. Carroll has accused Trump of raping her in a dressing room at the Bergdorf Goodman department store in Manhattan in 1995 or 1996 and defaming her by denying it happened. Trump has denied the allegations and accused Carroll of making up the story to boost sales of her 2019 memoir. Subscribe for more content like this. Carroll’s lawyer, Roberta Kaplan, argued that a 2005 Access Hollywood video in which Trump boasts about grabbing women “by the p***y” bolsters her client’s claim, along with other women who have accused him of sexual assault. Kaplan claimed that Trump’s behaviour was exactly what brought them to court. She played jurors a video of Trump’s October deposition in the case, where he mistook a photo of Carroll for his second wife, Marla Maples, before his lawyer corrected him. Thanks for watching, subscribe to our channel for authenticity.

(By Mehwish)

President Joe Biden is facing a mixed reception among Black voters in South Carolina, with some praising his record and others expressing disappointment. While some, like small-business owner LaJoia Broughton, see Biden as a leader who has provided opportunities for Black-owned businesses and brought integrity to the White House, others, like 22-year-old Destiny Humphreys, feel that he has not lived up to his promises and that real change is needed. Biden's success in the 2020 presidential campaign was largely thanks to Black voters in South Carolina, who supported him and helped him secure the Democratic nomination. However, the conflicting views among Black voters in the state suggest that Biden may face challenges as he seeks to maintain the diverse coalition that helped him win the presidency. For Broughton, who owns a lobbying and public affairs firm in Columbia, South Carolina's capital city, Biden has proven himself over the past few years and she has no doubts about who she will be voting for in the next election. But for Humphreys, a senior at South Carolina State University, the state's only public historically Black college or university, or HBCU, Biden's record has left her feeling disappointed and unsure about her vote. Subscribe for more content like this. As Biden gears up for his reelection bid, he will need to find ways to bridge the divide among Black voters in South Carolina and across the country. This may require a renewed focus on issues that are important to this constituency, such as criminal justice reform, economic empowerment, and voting rights. Ultimately, the future of Biden's presidency and his reelection bid will depend on his ability to win over Black voters, who have historically played a critical role in Democratic victories. If he can convince voters like Humphreys that he is committed to real change and making good on his promises, he may be able to maintain the coalition that propelled him to the White House. But if he fails to connect with Black voters, his path to victory in 2024 may be much more difficult. Thanks for watching, subscribe to our channel for authenticity. (By Mehwish)

The case of E. Jean Carroll vs. Donald Trump has been ongoing for several years, but it is finally coming to a close. The two parties rested their cases on Thursday, leaving the decision in the hands of a federal jury next week. The case revolves around Carroll's accusation that Trump raped her in a Manhattan department-store dressing room in the 1990s. During the trial, Trump's lawyers had previously stated that they would not be calling any witnesses, and that Trump himself would not be testifying. However, Judge Lewis Kaplan said that if the former president changed his mind about testifying, he could make a motion to do so before 5 p.m. Sunday. The case has garnered national attention, with many watching closely to see if justice will be served for Carroll. The case is not just about Carroll's individual accusation, but also about holding powerful men accountable for their actions. Carroll has been vocal about her experience, and has received support from other women who have accused Trump of sexual misconduct. However, Trump has denied all allegations against him and has claimed that Carroll is lying. The case will ultimately come down to whether or not the jury believes Carroll's account of the events. Subscribe for more content like this. This case is also significant because it highlights the difficulties that women face when they come forward with accusations of sexual assault or harassment. Many times, they are met with disbelief and scrutiny, and their character is called into question. Carroll's case is no different, as she has faced attacks on her credibility from Trump's supporters. The outcome of this case will have far-reaching implications, and not just for Trump and Carroll. It will send a message about the importance of believing women and holding powerful men accountable for their actions. It will also send a message to survivors of sexual assault and harassment that their voices matter and that justice is possible. As the jury prepares to deliberate, the nation watches with bated breath. Will justice be served, or will yet another powerful man evade accountability for his actions? The answer remains to be seen, but the outcome of this case will undoubtedly have a profound impact on the ongoing conversation about sexual assault and harassment in our society. Thanks for watching, subscribe to our channel for authenticity. (By Mehwish)