commonsenselaw

USC Title 18, § 31 9(6) - Definition of "Motor Vehicle": "The term "motor vehicle" means every description of carriage or other contrivance propelled or drawn by mechanical power and used for commercial purposes on the highways in the transportation of passengers and property, or property or cargo." USC Title 18, § 31(10) - Definition of "Commercial Purposes": "The term "used for commercial purposes" means the carriage of the persons or property for any fare, fee, rate, charge or other consideration, or directly or indirectly in connection with any business, or other undertaking for profit." SHUTTLESWORTH v. BIRMINGHAM, ALABAMA, 373 US 262 ”If the state does convert your right into a privilege and issue a license and charge a fee for it, you can ignore the license and fee and engage in the right with impunity.” SHAPIRO v. THOMPSON 394 US 618 "All citizens must be free to travel throughout the United States uninhibited by statutes, rules, and regulations..." THOMPSON v. SMITH, 155 Va 367 "The RIGHT of the citizen TO TRAVEL UPON THE PUBLIC HIGHWAYS and to transport his property thereon, either by horse-drawn carriage OR BY AUTOMOBILE, IS NOT A MERE PRIVILEGE which the city may prohibit or permit at will, BUT IS A COMMON RIGHT." So your car, SUV, or motorcycle is only a "commercial vehicle" if you are getting paid to "drive" it. If you are only using it to travel around to go to work, school, groceries, or any other private reason then it IS NOT A "MOTOR VEHICLE". Here is the dilemma, when the government started requiring the commercial vehicles to be registered and licensed it made that a regulable activity for that purpose. They made everyone else believe it was the same for the general public. The police, you and all your friends are taught that you are always 'operating' a 'motor vehicle' which are both commercial regulable activities. CRAIG v. MISSOURI, U S 29, 410 The state cannot change the meaning of “motor vehicle” and “driver” to fit their own needs: "Is the proposition to be maintained, that the constitution meant to prohibit names and not things? That a very important act, big with great and ruinous mischief which is expressly forbidden by words most appropriate for its description; may be performed by the substitution of a name? That the constitution, in one of its most important provisions, may be openly evaded by giving a new name to an old thing? We cannot think so.” […The State] cannot change the name of a thing to avoid the mandates of the Constitution.]" Kent v. Dulles, 357 U.S. 116, 125. The right to travel is a part of the "liberty" of which the citizen cannot be deprived without due process of law under the Fifth Amendment. So much is conceded by the solicitor general. In Anglo Saxon law that right was emerging at least as early as Magna Carta. Kent v. Dulles, 357 U.S. 116, 125.

The following audio lecture is given by Bill Thornton

https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title39-section201&num=0&edition=prelim §201. United States Postal Service There is established, as an independent establishment of the executive branch of the Government of the United States, the United States Postal Service. ( Pub. L. 91–375, Aug. 12, 1970, 84 Stat. 720 .) Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries Effective Date Section effective July 1, 1971, pursuant to Resolution No. 71–9 of the Board of Governors. See section 15(a) of Pub. L. 91–375, set out as a note preceding section 101 of this title. Transfer of Functions; Abolition of Office Pub. L. 91–375, §4(a), Aug. 12, 1970, 84 Stat. 773 , provided that: "There are hereby transferred to the United States Postal Service all the functions, powers, and duties of the Post Office Department and the Postmaster General of the Post Office Department, and the Post Office Department and the office of Postmaster General of the Post Office Department are abolished."

Just a piece i found , I do not agree with commentary . https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title39-section201&num=0&edition=prelim The Postal reorganization act ( FRAUD) Congress did not have authority to abolish the post office , See article 1 section 8 of the Constitution. Post office has never been amended , see Article 5. The federal courts in Pittsburgh fictitiously Claim Post office untill 2021 when congress claims they abolished and created Walmart , Oooppps , i mean United States Postal Service ( usps) corporation to steal elections and we the peoples rights .

trickery , deceit and fraudulent means to entrap

Who owns the Street address ? Who created the address ?

All Police departments will hire any retard And you wonder why people run from them. Cop farted watch out he gonna endanger everyone.. Cop heard a acorn drop on his car. https://www.infowars.com/posts/shock-footage-shows-cop-open-fire-on-handcuffed-unarmed-suspect-in-police-car-after-mistaking-acorn-for-gunshot/

This video show the abuse of tax payers money by your servants and how they launder money until they find a crime. I forgot to write down the police stand off video , So as soon as i find i will link. https://www.wtaj.com/crime/two-pennsylvania-women-sentenced-for-role-in-multi-state-drug-trafficking/

I apologize at around 17 mins this video breaks up, but the link i was reading is below. https://www.forbes.com/sites/adamtanner/2013/07/08/how-the-post-office-sells-your-new-address-with-anyone-who-pays-and-the-little-known-loophole-to-opt-out/?sh=4a28ed839f3d https://postalpro.usps.com/mailing-and-shipping-services/NCOALink https://postalpro.usps.com/Licensing_Fees https://www.aei.org/op-eds/the-postal-service-is-a-spy-op-now/

https://rumble.com/v3wt3p7-ostal-fraud-on-the-department-of-justice-with-fraud-on-the-courts-and-judic.html The green card return receipt never entered on record , as you can see

https://rumble.com/v3wt3p7-ostal-fraud-on-the-department-of-justice-with-fraud-on-the-courts-and-judic.html The green card still on Department of justice envelope . I related the to article 1 and 2/3 majority and to correct myself it is article 5 2/3 to amend the constitution. https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/39/1.1

Postal service steals their own mail and breaches the contract that was created . Post office stealing you money . https://rumble.com/v3wt3p7-ostal-fraud-on-the-department-of-justice-with-fraud-on-the-courts-and-judic.html Comment if you have had issues with post office .