chamoisas

Andrew and Virginia Brown discuss with the crowd all the many benefits that come as a "package" with the coming kingdom of God. From The Word of Truth Ministry 2019 Bible Conference in Milwaukee, WI. This year's theme is "The Premillennial Kingdom of God." http://www.knowinggodintheword.org/ https://www.seedandbread.org/

Andrew Brown relates how we can discover and prove the existence of the important premillennial kingdom prophetic period. From The Word of Truth Ministry 2019 Bible Conference in Milwaukee, WI. This year's theme is "The Premillennial Kingdom of God."

Candy Davis discusses "Let There Be Light!" and the fact that the premillennial kingdom of God will begin with the enlightenment of all mankind. From The Word of Truth Ministry 2019 Bible Conference in Milwaukee, WI. This year's theme is "The Premillennial Kingdom of God." http://www.knowinggodintheword.org/ https://www.seedandbread.org/

Take a second to honestly observe the following picture and tell me what this looks like to you? If you said a bunch of cardboard, construction paper, curtain rods, gold tape and foil, you would be correct. If instead you said The National Aeronautics and Space Administrations highest technological achievement, incapable of being reproduced today, the Apollo 11 Lunar Lander, then you would also be correct. Most unbiased viewers would assume your average high school art class could construct this contraption without much struggle, but official NASA spokesman and astronaut Don Petit assures us that actually this 1969 technology is so advanced that even with their multi-billion dollar yearly budget, they cannot for the life of them recreate it now. "I'd go back to the Moon in a nano-second," Don informs us, "but NASA destroyed that technology and its a painful process to build it back again." Firstly, why on Earth would NASA destroy the original Apollo Lunar Landers? The historic first crafts that landed men on the Moon, the supposed most incredible achievements of mankind, and they irreparably destroyed them so that they could not be replicated even after 50 years? Could it be because they didn't want future generations able to visit museums and see these laughable 1960s attempts at high-tech-looking space vehicles? And what other 1960s technology is so advanced and expensive that it cannot be recreated easily and far better now than way back then? If you still believe man has actually walked on the Moon and rovers are rolling around on Mars, please do me, yourself, and the rest of humanity a favor and watch my following presentation, The NASA Moon and Mars Landing Hoaxes: https://odysee.com/@EricDubay:c/TheNASAMoonandMarsLandings:1 Get Connected with me! Website: http://www.EricDubay.com Blog: http://www.AtlanteanConspiracy.com Forum: http://www.IFERS.123.st Books: http://www.lulu.com/spotlight/ericdubay Facebook: https://web.facebook.com/groups/edfes/ Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/ericdubaz/ Telegram: t.me/flatearthericdubay Twitter: https://twitter.com/ericdubay SoundCloud: https://soundcloud.com/eric-dubay/ Mewe: https://mewe.com/i/ericdubay Minds: https://www.minds.com/EricDubay Gab: https://gab.ai/Eric-Dubay Flote: https://flote.app/user/EricDubay Goodreads: https://www.goodreads.com/ericdubay YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/c/flateartheric Odysee: https://odysee.com/@EricDubay:c BitChute: https://www.bitchute.com/channel/TCgwKoAf3Y9z/ BrandNewTube: https://brandnewtube.com/@EricDubay Rokfin: https://rokfin.com/EricDubay Email: ericdubaynewsletter@protonmail.com

One simple and definitive proof that you are not living on a spinning ball orbiting around the Sun is the fact that daytime and nighttime never switch places as they must for the heliocentric model to be true. According to the globe doctrine, Earth makes one complete rotation on its axis every 24 hours, while simultaneously orbiting around the Sun and completing one full revolution every 365 days. If this was truly happening however, as you can see from the following image, the daytime and nighttime sides of the globe would have to flip every 6 months. For a more detailed illustration of this, imagine the Sun rising at 6am in New York on the Summer solstice. After 3 months of 24 hour rotations, the globe would be 90 degrees from its previous position and a quarter turn away from the Sun, meaning that sunrise in New York during the Autumnal equinox should now be happening at midnight. After 3 more months of 24 hour rotations, the globe would be on the complete opposite side of the Sun, 180 degrees from its starting position, so that sunrise in New York during the Winter solstice should be happening at 6pm, or in other words, daytime and nighttime would have completely flipped from 6 months earlier. After 3 more months of 24 hour rotations, the globe would be 270 degrees from its original position, and sunrise in New York during the Spring equinox should be happening at noon. In reality, as you can test and observe for yourself, this simply does not happen and remains yet another nail in the globe's coffin. Globe apologist naysayers make either one of two ridiculous claims in an attempt to excuse away this clear problem in their model. Their first defense is to claim that days are not actually 24 hours long, but instead only long, and this 4 minute difference per day fixes the math allowing day and night to flip. Now it is true that there are two kinds of days known as solar days and sidereal days, and sidereal days are in fact minutes long, but solar days, which everyone on Earth sets their clocks by, are exactly 24 hours in duration. Sidereal days, which nobody sets their clocks by, are actually how long the fixed stars take to make one revolution over and around our Earth plane. As you can observe and measure for yourself, the constellations rotate just slightly faster than the Sun, so that they take exactly minutes to come back to their starting point, while the Sun takes exactly 24 hours (4 minutes longer) to come back to its starting point. Firstly, the fact that sidereal and solar days both exist and are not exactly the same duration, is yet another proof that the stars and Sun are moving and not the Earth. If the apparent movement of the stars and Sun was actually the result of us living on a spinning globe, as we're told, then there would and could only be one duration of day, namely, the amount of time it takes to complete one full rotation. The fact that there are two different durations of rotation time for the Sun and stars just further proves that they are moving at their own unique speeds over and around a motionless, fixed Earth. Secondly, if globe apologists want to claim solar days are now suddenly only minutes, then why hasn't anyone in history ever noticed that our 24 hour clocks, which billions of people have used for thousands of years, actually fall behind reality 4 minutes every single day!? The reason is because it doesn't happen, and trying to claim solar days are the same duration as sidereal days just shows the disingenuous lengths these zealots will go to cling onto their false cosmology. Their next defense, even more ridiculous than the first, is to claim that the Earth actually must complete 361 degrees of rotation per day, and that that somehow makes up for it. They completely redefine what a "day" means and claim, instead of a day being one full 24 hour rotation of the globe as we have always been taught, a "day" now suddenly means "the amount of rotation until the Sun reaches the same point in the sky," which they say is approximately 361 degrees. With this excuse, however, new problems arise because the globe's supposed orbit around the Sun is actually elliptical, so depending where/when during its revolution around the Sun, the Earth's rotation on its axis would have to be both speeding up and slowing down at different times of the year just to maintain their new definition of what a "day" means. But of course in their own model, the Earth's alleged rotation never speeds up or slows down and remains constant always. They cannot have it both ways, but like the kid who wants to have his cake and eat it too, these leaps of logic pose no problem for the willfully ignorant.