austux

on the South shoulder of Mt Melville a handful of days after a reasonable amount of rain

this does _not_ examine some of the more esoteric possible components (such as the researched common experiences of many hundreds of people influenced by DMT), however it _does_ draw some fairly firm boundaries — a few of them in several ways — that many people would rather did not exist, and also covers some of the not-so-obvious consequences of (and incoherent results of) holding a simplistic view of reality.

this does _not_ examine some of the more esoteric possible components (such as the researched common experiences of many hundreds of people influenced by DMT), however it _does_ draw some fairly firm boundaries — a few of them in several ways — that many people would rather did not exist, and also covers some of the not-so-obvious consequences to a simplistic view of reality.

their existence conflicts with some world-views, have far-reaching consequences, and change the possible ending of the story. this includes qualifiers removing some incoherent factors.

their existence conflicts with some world-views, have far-reaching consequences, and change the possible ending of the story

existence of these entities conflicts with some world-views, and has far-reaching consequences

this has some very far-reaching consequences

a view West from near Lookout 2 at SandPatch, near Albany, Western Australia; 3 WECs idle out of 18

WEC1 to WEC12 were idle for a long-term maintenance cycle (about three decades), so only WEC13 to WEC18 were farming the available wind

facing West from the Natural Bridge in Torndirrup National Park near Albany, Western Australia, camera partly braced on a solid handrail

does your position have reason? if so, how...?

quite a few other entities also fall into that category. how do you deal with non-physical entities?

What is possible, what is necessary? Some long-reaching consequences of very basic principles and observations.

almost none of the dictionary or encyclopedia entries defining this word agree with the desired-by-many concept "lacks a belief in any god(s)" so the implications and foundations are carefully considered.

Few atheists are satisfied with the existing definitions of a term they use to identify themselves; this explores a few of the discontinuities and several of the foundations upon which this and related terms are built.

the two ‘obvious’ answers are both inadequate, so we explore a little more deeply... and the results may surprise you

We exist. This has consequences, some sets of which are explored, occasionally more deeply than some people with fixed beliefs would prefer.