Wendover6

about the game from many of my friends and got to know it. In the comments below the ZERO HOUR steam, the word that appears most often is Rainbow Six: Siege. For many FPS gamers, the best CQB tactical game is currently Rainbow Six: Siege, and ZERO HOUR can be used by players to compare with Rainbow Six: Siege, so there must be something to it.

Zero Hour is a tactical FPSAugust 2020 as a "sneak preview" for single player or team play, and has been described by some players as a "hardcore version of Color Six Siege". The game has tens of thousands of reviews on Steam, with an 83% positive rating, and was recently discounted to a special price of $24. A beta version of the FPS shooter called ZERO HOUR was recently released on steam, and many players have already tried it and experienced it!

newcomers to get used to the game. However, since the skills of each R6 cadre are not quite the same and many of them are solo, players should still have the possibility to rely on their own shooting skills to win, even in the event of a one-on-many handicap.

y because it's very unfriendly to newcomers, with complex terrain causing newcomers to be shot down before they even see the enemy, or to be "stolen to death" before they can even enter the door. Basically, it is difficult for newcomers to R6 to have a good experience before level 30, and with the different skills and tactics of each R6 off

been an amenable game, mainly because it's very unfriendly to newcomers, with complex terrain causing newcomers to be shot down before they even see the enemy, or to be "stolen to death" before they can even enter the door. Basically, it is difficult for newcomers to R6 to have a good experience before level 30, and with the different skill

bat. Even so, ZERO HOUR's combat experience is not comparable to R6's, and not just because of bugs, modelling, feel and other details. Because for ZERO HOUR, after all, out of the prison testing phase, R6 was also gradually getting rid of bugs after the health action.

cs are the charm of the game for FPS games ZERO HOUR feels to me like a new installment in the Swat series, knowing that Swat is the originator of the tactical FPS, combining FPS, tactics and realism back in the 90s. The realism of Swat, however, is reflected in the fact that there are many non-lethal weapons and "bloo

e but relatively flat, so the player is mostly engaged in marching missions. With "three-dimensional maps" like ZERO HOUR and R6, the tactical complexity is much higher. Especially when ZERO HOUR adds more detail to the game, the time spent in the game is inevitably lengthened considerably and taken up by a lot of tac

g time greatly reduces the entertainment of Armed Assault 3, and the tactical planning and execution requires the player to act in unison This limits the player's autonomy, again cutting into the experience and making Armed Assault 3 a niche game. It is important to note that

. So long tactical times inevitably lead to shorter combat times, as in Armed Assault 3 where it is often half an hour of tactical planning and execution and ten minutes of shooting and fighting.

ic indoor close quarters combat, so the game maps are relatively not particularly large and are more three-dimensional rather than flat. For example, the maps in the R6 games are dominated by buildings, and the complexity of the terrain highlights the importance of tactics, so both ZERO HOUR and R6 are tactics-based FPS games. In FPS games, tactical time and combat time make up the entire gameplay

ps and large battlefields with many players Battlefield, Call of Duty: Warzone etc., the game length does not affect the gameplay too much, but for CQB games the game time is also an important factor in the gameplay. High intensity tactics

The damage system in Escape from Tarkov, for example, has different effects on different parts of the body, and hand injuries on the left and right arms have different effects.

is directly proportional to the hardcore level of the game In the case of Armed Assault 3, there are a number of modules that are made to enhance the realism of the game in order to achieve a higher level of realism. Once you install these modules, you'll find that using a sniper rifle requires adjusting the closeness based on distance, and is required to calculate wind and humidity based on a ballistic solver. I'm not sure how many players will use these game designs correctly, but I'm afraid it's hard enough jus

ERO HOUR more realistic than R6, but perhaps less so in terms of gameplay. In the current gaming world, the realism of the game seems to be the most important element for gamers.

the props in ZERO HOUR are shared by the whole team The camera cannot mark the location of enemies, and opening doors requires two steps, the first being half-open and the second being fully open.

cameras for the defending side and tactical torches for the attacking side, and perhaps the inclusion of equipment such as night vision devices in the future.

such as electric switches on every map This detail means that lighting is a very important factor in ZERO HOUR's gameplay. Because the light can be altered, this leads to a range of gameplay elem

The most common of all player reviews of ZERO HOUR is to rate it as the most realistic tactical counter-terrorism game, with the main comparison being R6.