RaspberryOtters

Warmongers from the US/UK and their NATO minions have hurt millions of people over the years, including the economies and lives of their own citizens. Collectively this political bloc stunted small growing economies and destablized regions across the globe through wars-for-profit and the funding & arming of proxy wars. I recorded this clip on October 19, 2020 for future reference to help sort out my thoughts and perceptions of the tipsy topsy world we now all exist in. Today seemed like an appropriate time to share this online. {{Sorry for the motion! I am not a professional LoL not even close. I recorded this using my phone.}}

Citizens around the world are protesting Western government tyranny and the best way for Tyrants to eradicate public dissent is to announce a security threat granting them absolute power to assert more edicts to further constrain civil liberties and freedoms; in America for example: to delegitimize the People’s Constitution, to make irrelevant Human Rights atrocities resulting from contrive conflicts and war profiteers, to censor non-government influenced journalist & news organizations, to abolish citizen free speech and to hinder the movement of Americans within US borders and around world. US, UK & Canada et al. Warmongers manufacturing a distraction to manage domestic upheavals and suppress political scandals. War Propaganda disseminated by US (aka NATO) the past six months is meant to coerce the public into supporting yet another WAR FOR PROFIT by promoting fear and eliciting feelings of patriotism under the banner of Democracy, which is in itself a false flag because Democracy is an illusion of the State in the Twenty-first Century. What better tried and true method to "rally" the "homelands" than manufacturing a pretense for War with the West’s favorite villain, Russia. When did Western nations become the bad guys? Tipsy-topsy world we live in now-a-days.

The Pot Calling The Kettle Black - Puppet’s Misinformation Minister televised comments as Russian-US talks take place in Geneva. I’m just an average US citizen with no expertise other than having a little common sense and the belief in justice, but none-the-less, I am puzzled by the notion ‘negotiations’ can take place concurrent with threats of sanctions based on a predetermined outcome by the UN? Doesn’t that make these “talks” nothing more than a UN Kangaroo Court rather than a genuine sit down where all parties are engaged in honest, unbiased considerations and negotiations bound by a legal contract?