Newsmilitary

The intensifying competition between China and the United States has prompted the two countries to increase military readiness in the Asia-Pacific region, observers say. While the US has conducted more drills with its Asian allies and intensified security ties – aimed in part at deterring North Korea but also sending a warning to China – the mainland has completed drills with Russia and drills around Taiwan. The US and South Korea conducted a joint air force exercise on December 20 in response to North Korea's missile launch. The drills cover Washington's strategic assets, such as F-22 stealth fighters and B-52 bombers, for the first time in four years. In a joint statement issued in November, the US and South Korean defense ministers agreed to use more US strategic assets on the Korean peninsula to provide "extended deterrence" against North Korea's nuclear threat. Seoul announced plans to expand joint exercises next year, including the first large-scale combined direct-fire drills in six years. Andrew Yeo, a senior fellow and Chair of the SK-Korea Foundation's Korea Studies at the Brookings Institution in Washington, said that if North Korea continues to develop nuclear weapons, the US and its allies will continue to step up their military response to Pyongyang. "It seems we are still in the phase of military tension escalation, which means that larger joint exercises are still being carried out," he said. "Even though South Korea and the US have offered dialogue and assistance and economic incentives, this will be difficult for North Korea to accept." The US has also increased military cooperation with other Asian allies. In September, Washington approved a US$1.1 billion weapons package, including anti-ship and anti-air missile and radar systems, for Taiwan. The National Defense Authorization Act signed by US President Joe Biden last month sets out the US military budget for next year, including support for US$10 billion worth of security assistance to the self-ruled island over the next five years. President Xi Jinping told the Communist Party's national congress in October that Beijing would do its best to achieve peaceful reunification with Taiwan, but would not rule out using force to bring the island under its control. Most countries, including the US, do not recognize Taiwan as an independent nation. Washington, however, opposes any attempt to take the island by force. #militarynews #chinesemilitary

The Indian government imposed a fine on French company Dassault Aviation last month for delaying compensation obligations that were part of a 2016 deal for 36 Rafale combat aircraft, Defense News has learned. The governments of France and India signed a contract worth €7.8 billion (US$8.8 billion) in September 2016. Under the arrangement, 50% of the contract value will be matched and implemented by Dassault Aviation and its partners Safran and Thales within seven years. . To implement the offsets, the three companies are working closely with more than 70 Indian companies and Defense Research and Development Organizations. A senior defense scientist in India said DRDO was seeking from French businesses some technologies related to stealth capabilities, radars, space engines, thrust vectors for missiles and materials for electronics. An Indian Ministry of Defense official told Defense News that the penalty would come from a €185 million bank guarantee funded by Dassault Aviation as protection against breach of contract. The official spoke on condition of anonymity because the person is not authorized to speak to the media. The official would not share the value of the penalty imposed on Dassault Aviation, or any individual details that hindered the implementation of the indemnification obligations. Under MoD policy, original equipment manufacturers can offset by buying related goods or services from Indian suppliers, by making foreign direct investment in India's defense industry, or by transferring advanced technology. When asked for comment, the French Ministry of Armed Forces referred Defense News to Dassault Aviation, which did not return a request for comment. French Armed Forces Minister Florence Parly and Indian Defense Minister Rajnath Singh met on December 17 to discuss how to improve bilateral defense cooperation. During the 3rd annual dialogue, the Ministry of Defense pointed out that some French defense companies are not cooperating on technology transfers to the DRDO. MoD sources said the French business had claimed the Indian company expected to receive the technology transfer did not meet the required core competencies. #militarynews #indianarmy SOURCE: https://www.defensenews.com/industry/2021/12/20/india-fines-french-firm-dassault-aviation-over-offset-delays/

The United States military base in Subic Bay, Philippines, has been abandoned by the military of Uncle Sam's country for more than 30 years. But they plan to return there. This is given their uneasy relationship with China. They have concerns over China's increasing maritime presence, said a top official at the local body that oversees the free port zone. The US military returns to Subic Bay after 30 years away from its largest military base in Asia. The former US Naval Base at Subic Bay overlooking the South China Sea, has become a bustling free port employing around 150,000 local residents and administered by the Subic Bay Metropolitan Authority (SBMA). Manila and Washington have been negotiating to set up five more sites in the Asian country to build US military facilities and provide weapons under the Enhanced Defense Cooperation Agreement (EDCA). SBMA chairman Rolen Paulino said Wednesday he would be "very surprised" if Subic Bay did not host the EDCA "during the war, and at a very important time". Paulino's statement was made the day before the 30th anniversary. the year the US Navy departed from the port it has controlled for nearly 94 years. A series of events were held Thursday at the free harbor to commemorate the 30th Anniversary of the SBMA's founding, including a public display of civilian aircraft and a Philippine Navy helicopter at Subic airport which is now being repurposed for aviation supervision and training. Signed in 2014, EDCA is likely to continue beyond its 10 year period, as demonstrated by the United States' renewed interest in establishing a new base in the Philippines and new funding to upgrade existing EDCA sites. Paulino said tensions in the Taiwan Strait and increasing hostility between the United States and China were of concern. Paulino, a former mayor of Subic's neighboring city of Olongapo, prefers the Philippine government to maintain a defense alliance with the United States. #militarynews #philippines #america #china #military

A more recent ballistic missile test is believed to have failed, and did not make it over to Japan. "North Korea has been testing missiles with longer and longer ranges," said Joseph Byrne, a researcher at the Royal United Services Institute. "This [activity] could be a sign that they will test another nuclear warhead, which has been predicted for some time," he added. North Korea has also tested the Hwasong-14 ballistic missile. This missile has a range of 8,000 km - although some studies suggest it can travel as far as 10,000 km, thus being able to reach New York. This is North Korea's first intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM). #russiaukrainewar #militarynews

Russia accused Ukraine of carrying out the attack using Dirty Boom and then the gif would accuse mosco of using a move that Moscow judges said would lead to an uncontrollable escalation. This was conveyed by Defense Minister Sergiswaygu during Marathon talks with the Defense Ministers of a number of NATO countries including America, Britain, France, and Turkey by telephone on Sunday, October 23, 2022. According to Gum, he discussed the worsening war situation. in Ukraine, Fosti reported that the purpose of the provocation was to accuse Russia of using weapons. mass destruction in Ukraine and will then launch a powerful anti-Russian campaign in the world aimed at undermining trust in Moscow. But British Defense Secretary Band Wallace denied Moscow's claims and insisted western countries were not facilitating the escalation of the war in UKNA Wales as soy also warned the accusations could not be used as a pretext for a bigger escalation while French Defense Minister Sebastian lekornu said the country would do so. not involved in any form of escalation in the Ukrainian conflict, especially regarding the nuclear option. The Ukrainian president of course rejected Russia's accusations even he said the false statement was a signal that Russia would do Russia itself would use the weapon and then it would be used as an excuse to carry out a possible nuclear counterattack according to Yerenzy if Russia said so. Ukraine is allegedly preparing something that means one thing Russia has prepared for all of this is the same thing the minister said abroad the size that was in the Metro lecture denounced Moscow's claims as absurd and dangerous he thought Russia often accused others of what they plan yourself. but what exactly is a dirty bomb the same as a biological weapon or chemical weapon or similar to a nuclear bomb. there is no detailed definition of this type of weapon and the Dirty Bomb has also never been used in war anywhere a number of sources say a dirty bomb is a combination of explosives and radioactive material such as powder when dynamite or other explosives explode it will throw radioactive material underground. This area is different from biological weapons or biological chemical weapons which do not use explosives so they are not called biological bombs.

The Dems canceled Russia's offer of talks and would keep Israel on track in Ukraine. A group of 30 Progressive Democrats from the House of Representatives called on the Biden administration to start negotiations with Russia to end the conflict in Ukraine. The White House rejected the offer, using the usual set of arguments. The day after the letter was sent, its authors announced that they were withdrawing the appeal. Rep. Pramila Jayapal later explained that the letter was written in the summer and sent due to a misunderstanding. According to the expert interviewed by Vedomosti, the letter is a political move of the Democratic Party, an attempt to take advantage of the moment before the election. The letter called for a change in Ukraine policy, direct negotiations with Russia, lifting some sanctions, and promoting a ceasefire. Legislative representatives say that a decision on the fate of Ukraine is impossible without its participation, but believes in the need for direct US talks with Russia on this issue. "There's no way congressmen are seriously interested in negotiating with Russia. Democrats have developed a hard-line stance towards Moscow, and any peace initiative they're offering would be incompatible with the Russian leadership," Victoria Zhuravleva, head of the Center for North American Studies at IMEMO RAS , say. Fyodor Voitolovsky, director of IMEMO RAS, believes that Democrats are trying to distance themselves from Biden's position and take the initiative from Republicans on some issues. So far, there has been no further development of the success of the Ukrainian Armed Forces in September and there is a risk that the mobilization in Russia could lead to a new attack by Moscow, according to expert at the Russian Council for International Affairs Ivan Timofeev. Congress may want to negotiate now, while nothing has changed. Ukraine's successes are not forgotten in the media, and Ukraine has not become a military financial black hole for the US budget, as Iraq and Afghanistan used to be, timofeev admits. Israel has refused to supply weapons to Kiev since February 2022, despite pressure from the US and repeated requests from the leadership in Kiev. However, ahead of the November 1 legislative elections, Israeli politicians said they might reconsider their gun policies. Experts interviewed by Izvestia, however, believe that Israel still will not change the balanced position between Moscow and Kiev, as this would mean breaking ties with Russia. #militarynews #russiaukrainewar #russia #ukraine #iran #japan #militarynews Source: https://tass.com/pressreview/1527383

Central Command has taken the highly unusual step of uncovering the presence of the US Navy's Ohio-class nuclear ballistic missile submarine in the Arabian Sea. The announcement was framed as a visit by the commander-in-chief, US Army General Michael Kurilla, to get a first-hand look at one of America's key capabilities operating in the region. However, it's hard not to see it as a message aimed at potential adversaries, such as Iran or Russia, as well as America's allies and partners. US Navy Vice Admiral Brad Cooper, head of US Navy and Fifth Fleet Central Command (NAVCENT), joined General Kurilla and members of his staff on their visit to the USS West Virginia at an undisclosed location in the Arabian Sea, according to a Central Command press release (CENTCOM). ). ) was issued today. The release did not say how Kurilla, Cooper and the others got to the submarine or when exactly the visit took place. “I was very impressed with the crew of the USS West Virginia; these sailors represent the highest level of professionalism, expertise and discipline in the entire US military," Kurilla said in a statement. "This submarine is the crown jewel of the nuclear triad. , and West Virginia demonstrated the flexibility, survivability, readiness, and capability of USCENTCOM and USSTRATCOM [US Strategic Command] forces at sea." The US Navy currently has 14 Ohio-class ballistic missile submarines, or SSBNs, originally designed to carry up to The Trident has 24 submarine ballistic missiles (SLBMs), but this maximum load has been reduced to 20 as part of an arms control agreement with Russia.The vehicles, or MIRVs, are designed and can carry up to 14 nuclear warheads each. There are four more Ohio-class ships in Navy service that have been converted into guided-missile submarines, or SSGNs. While best known for its ability to carry a maximum load of 154 Tomahawk land attack cruise missiles, the SSGN Ohio is actually a multipurpose ship that can deploy a variety of unmanned systems, serve as an aircraft carrier for special operations forces, and act as an underwater intelligence fusion. command centers and posts, as you can read more about in the previous War Zone feature. Source: https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/highly-unusual-disclosure-made-of-u-s-ballistic-missile-submarines-presence-in-arabian-sea #military #militarynews #newsmilitaryfuture #russiaukrainewar

Iran agrees to send missiles, more drones to Russia Iran has promised to provide Russia with surface-to-surface missiles, in addition to more drones, two senior Iranian officials and two Iranian diplomats told Reuters, a move likely to anger the United States and other Western powers. A deal was agreed on October 6 when Iran's First Vice President Mohammad Mokhber, two senior officials from Iran's powerful Revolutionary Guard and an official from the Supreme National Security Council visited Moscow to talk to Russia about arms shipments. Iran agrees to send missiles, more drones to Russia Reuters. "Russia has requested more Iranian drones and ballistic missiles with better accuracy, especially the Fateh and Zolfaghar missile families," said one of the Iranian diplomats, who was briefed on the trip. A Western official briefed on the matter confirmed it, saying there was an agreement between Iran and Russia to provide short-range surface-to-surface ballistic missiles, including the Zolfaghar. One of the drones Iran has approved supply is the Shahed-136, a delta-wing weapon used as a "kamikaze" air-to-surface attack aircraft. It carries a small warhead that explodes on impact. The Fateh-110 and Zolfaghar are Iranian short-range surface-to-surface ballistic missiles capable of striking targets at ranges between 300 km and 700 km (186 and 435 miles). Iranian diplomats reject Western officials' statements that such transfers violate the 2015 UN Security Council resolution of the crisis through diplomatic means," the diplomat said. Ukraine has reported a spate of Russian strikes using Iranian-made Shahed-136 drones in recent weeks. Iran's foreign ministry on Tuesday dismissed unsubstantiated reports about Iran supplying drones and other weapons to Russia for use in Ukraine, while the Kremlin on Tuesday denied its forces had used Iranian drones to attack Ukraine. Asked whether Russia had used Iranian drones in its campaign in Ukraine, Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said the Kremlin had no information about their use. #russiaukrainewar #russia #iran source: https://www.reuters.com/world/exclusive-iran-agrees-ship-missiles-more-drones-russia-defying-west-sources-2022-10-18/

North Korea has fired ballistic missiles at Japan, in what appears to be a deliberate escalation to get the attention of Tokyo and Washington. The missile traveled 4,500 km (2,800 miles) before crashing into the Pacific Ocean - far enough to hit the US island of Guam if it needed another pass. This was North Korea's first missile launch over Japan since 2017. Japan issued a warning to some citizens to take cover. The US, Japan and South Korea carried out their own military exercises in response. South Korean and US aircraft hit mock targets on an uninhabited island in the Yellow Sea, while the US and Japan also conducted joint exercises over the Sea of ​​Japan. The United Nations has banned North Korea from testing ballistic and nuclear weapons. Flying missiles into or over another country without any warning or consultation is also against international norms. Most countries avoid doing so completely as it can easily be mistaken for an attack. While not as big as a nuclear test - which could be next - it can be considered very provocative. People in northern Japan, including the island of Hokkaido and the city of Aomori, were reportedly awakened by the sound of sirens and text warnings that read: "North Korea appears to have launched a missile. Please evacuate to buildings or underground." As the missiles fly overhead, they are warned to be on the lookout for falling debris. However, many remained calm, with one video showing Tokyo passengers walking normally as loudspeakers sounded a warning. But others were more shaken. "If a missile hits, I'm afraid it will be a big problem not only here but also nationally," Aomori resident Kazuko Ebina told the Asahi Shimbun newspaper. Officials later said the medium-range ballistic missile fell into the Pacific Ocean far from Japan, and there were no reports of injuries. It has covered the longest distance a North Korean missile has ever traveled, and reached an altitude of about 1,000 km - higher than the International Space Station. apan Prime Minister Fumio Kishida described the launch as "violent behavior", while defense minister Yasukazu Hamada said Japan would not rule out any options to strengthen its defenses including "counter-attack capability". US President Joe Biden reinforced Washington's "strong commitment" to Japan's defense during a phone call with Mr Kishida, while the two leaders jointly condemned the missile test, a White House statement said. #northkorea #southkorea #japan SOURCE : https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-63126534

Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin said he believed Ukraine was "making progress," in the country's Kherson region as they continued to resist the Russian invasion, adding there had been "some kind of change in the dynamics of the battlefield." Austin attributed the changes to the skills of Ukrainian soldiers and their use of strategic weapons supplied by US and NATO allies, in particular the use of the high mobility air rocket system, or HIMARS. He made the comments in an exclusive interview with CNN's Fareed Zakaria that aired Sunday on "Fareed Zakaria GPS." "What we're seeing now is sort of a change in battlefield dynamics," Austin said. “They have done very, very well in the Kharkiv area and moved to take the chances. The fight in the Kherson region is going a little slower, but they're making progress." Austin said Ukrainian forces had used "HIMARS-like technology" and used it in the "right way" to "carry out attacks on things like logistics stores and command and control, which take - take significant capabilities out of Russia." By doing so, Ukraine has "changed the dynamic, and that creates opportunities for Ukraine to maneuver," he added. When asked why the US was not supplying the long-range weapons Ukraine had requested, Austin said he communicated with his Ukrainian counterpart, Defense Secretary Oleksii Reznikov, "on a regular basis," and believed the US had been "very effective in providing them with those weapons." very, very effective things on the battlefield.” While the US has provided Ukraine with HIMARS and a dual launch rocket system, or GMLRS, for use with the HIMAR system, Ukraine has requested the Army's Tactical Missile System, or ATACMS, which has a longer range than the US GLMR system. has been provided so far. The ATACMS has a range of about 185 miles. The maximum range of weapons the US provides to Ukraine is about 49 miles. Austin praised the success the Ukrainians had on the battlefield and noted that they used the weapons and technology given to them by the US in the “right way.” “It's not just about the equipment you have. It's about how you use the equipment, how you sync things together to create a battlefield effect that can then create opportunities," he said. Austin said what would happen in Ukraine was "hard to predict," but he said the US would "continue to provide security assistance to Ukraine for as long as needed." source: https://edition.cnn.com/2022/10/02/politics/lloyd-austin-ukraine-china-taiwan-cnntv/index.html

Thanks To The Army's Skill Strategic use of the weapons. #shorts #army #russiaukrainewar

Small Bomb That Could Turn Ukraine Into a Nuclear War Zone #militarynews #russiaukrainewar #ukraine #shorts #shortsyoutube #shortvideos

Russia Considers Mass Mobilization. That Won't Save His Troops In Ukraine. Counting Ukraine's devastating losses and quick gains of more than 200 days in the wider war in Ukraine, the Kremlin on Tuesday signaled it could take a step that would be a major shift in its posture: a general national mobilization, which could tie up to wartime service potentially millions of people. Russia. But this mobilization, if it goes into effect—and it becomes clear, it's a big if—will almost certainly fail to reverse Russia's faltering fortunes in Ukraine. Indeed, excellent mobilization could hasten the defeat of Russia. “Mobilization in Russia solves nothing,” tweeted Mike Martin, a fellow in the Department of War Studies at King's College in London. The main clue to the mobilization comes in the form of a bill that appeared in the Duma, Russia's stamp legislature, on Tuesday. Russian President Vladimir Putin has yet to sign the proposed law. A speech that was supposed to be delivered by Putin on Tuesday was postponed to Wednesday. Mobilization could make conscription for millions of Russians who, today, could easily avoid being drafted twice a year. In theory, mobilization could swell the ranks of the Russian army into the millions. In practice, the new troops would lack instructors to train them, units to absorb them, commanders to lead them, non-commissioned officers to guide them and equipment to provide them with useful combat power. fragile home garrisons of soldiers, undermining the legitimacy of Putin and his regime, draining the federal treasury and—in the best case—giving Ukraine a slew of untrained, ill-equipped, and poorly-led people who, most likely not, will quickly surrender, desert or die. . Even a successful mobilization would be too late. “It took months to turn civilians into soldiers,” explains Martin. "Russia needed soldiers yesterday, not in six months." In fact, the Russian army no longer trains recruits to a useful standard before sending them to the front. This summer, when the Kremlin first began trying to form a new unit to replace the estimated 50,000 victims Russia estimated then suffered in Ukraine, trainees only received 30 days of training before being deployed. A few months later, the army was even more desperate for a new army. The toll—dead and injured—could now exceed 80,000. Source: https://www.forbes.com/sites/davidaxe/2022/09/20/russia-mulls-mass-mobilization-it-wont-save-its-army-in-ukraine/?sh=6af8ba8a50e7

In destructive power, the Cold War giant dwarfed the American atomic bomb that destroyed Hiroshima. Washington's largest test explosion was 1,000 times as large. Moscow is 3,000 times. On both sides, the idea is to prevent attacks with the threat of major retaliation - by mutual destruction, or MAD. The psychological bar is so high that a nuclear strike is considered unthinkable. Today, both Russia and the United States possess far less destructive nuclear weapons — they are only a fraction of the power of the Hiroshima bomb, their use perhaps less frightening and more plausible. Concerns about these smaller weapons have increased as Vladimir V. Putin, in the Ukraine war, has warned of his nuclear powers, has put his atomic forces on alert and has put his military on risky attacks on nuclear power plants. The worry is that if Putin feels cornered into conflict, he might choose to detonate one of his smaller nuclear weapons — breaking a taboo that was established 76 years after Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Analysts note that Russian forces have long practiced the transition from conventional to nuclear warfare, primarily as a way to win after losing on the battlefield. And the military, they added, which has the world's largest nuclear arsenal, has been exploring various escalation options that Putin might choose. “The chances are small but increasing,” said Ulrich Kühn, a nuclear expert at the University of Hamburg and the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. “War is not going well for Russia,” he said, “and pressure from the West is increasing.” Putin may have fired weapons at uninhabited areas, not troops, said Dr. Kuhn. In a 2018 study, he outlined a crisis scenario in which Moscow detonated a bomb in a remote part of the North Sea as a way of signaling an impending deadly attack. "It feels terrible to talk about these things," said Dr. Kühn in an interview. "But we have to consider that this is a possibility." Washington expects more atomic moves from Putin in the days to come. Moscow will likely “increase its reliance on its nuclear deterrent to signal to the West and project power” as war and its consequences weaken Russia, Lieutenant General Scott D. Berrier, director of the Defense Intelligence Service, told House Armed Services. source: https://www.nytimes.com/2022/03/21/science/russia-nuclear-ukraine.html

Russia's invasion of Ukraine is the biggest threat to peace and security in Europe since the end of the Cold War. On February 21, 2022, Russian President Vladimir Putin gave a bizarre and at times disorganized speech outlining a long list of complaints as justification for the "special military operation" announced the following day. While these complaints include a long-simmering dispute over the expansion of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) and the shape of the post-Cold War security architecture in Europe, the speech centered on a much more fundamental issue: the legitimacy of Ukraine's identity. and the state itself. It reflects Putin's long-held worldview, emphasizes the deep unity among the East Slavs—Russians, Ukrainians and Belarusians, all of whom trace their origins to the medieval commonwealth of Kyivan Rus—and suggests that the modern states of Russia, Ukraine, and Belarus must share a political destiny both today and in the future. A corollary of that view is the claim that the distinct Ukrainian and Belarusian identities are the product of foreign manipulation and that, today, the West is following in the footsteps of its imperial rival Russia in using Ukraine (and Belarus) as part of the “anti-Russian Project.” Throughout Putin's reign, Moscow has pursued policies toward Ukraine and Belarus based on the assumption that each other's national identities are artificial—and therefore fragile. Putin's argument about foreign adversaries promoting Ukrainian (and, in a more diffuse way, Belarusian) identity as part of the geopolitical struggle against Russia echoes the way many of his predecessors refused to accept agents of ordinary people seeking autonomy from the tsar or Soviet domination. The historically-minded Putin has often come up with the ideas of thinkers who emphasized the organic unity of the Russian Empire and its peoples—especially its Slavic, Orthodox core—in the form of what historian Timothy Snyder calls “the politics of eternity,” belief in the unchanging essence of history. The prominence given by Putin and other Russian elites to the idea of ​​Russian-Ukrainian-Belarusian unity helps explain the origins of the current conflict, especially why Moscow is willing to risk a large-scale war on its borders when neither Ukraine nor NATO poses a problem. military threat. Source: https://www.csis.org/analysis/russias-war-ukraine-identity-history-and-conflict

During a briefing at the Pentagon, representatives from the US Department of Defense explained how discussions about providing tanks and infantry fighting vehicles to Ukraine were ongoing. In fact, a few days ago, several media outlets shared information that Washington was considering the supply of heavy armored vehicles to the Ukrainian Armed Forces. In particular, the German newspaper Süddeutsche Zeitung issued this information. The newspaper said the equipment in question was none other than Abrams himself, and also asked allies to evaluate the possibility of strengthening the AFU with German-made Leopard 2 tanks. The Pentagon responded to a request to confirm this information as follows: “Ukraine showed that they were quite effective on the counter-attack by using armor as part of their counter-attack. So, obviously, such abilities are important. But we don't have any specific plans about special abilities. at this point for medium to long term thinking about the actual provisioning program." Thus, discussions about whether to provide tanks such as the Abrams and Leopard 2, as well as IFVs, in particular the American M2 Bradley, are at the same stage as the fighter jets. In other words, it is objectively impossible to say Ukraine will receive Western heavy armored vehicles any time soon. At the same time, the transition from securing the current short term to the current medium term perspective could be quite rapid. On many levels, Ukraine is now struggling to get three types of weapons from its allies: long-range missiles, fighter jets, and heavily armored vehicles. Regarding the latter, Ukrainian Prime Minister Denys Shmyhal immediately asked the West to provide Abrams and Leopard 2. But given the current composition of the armed forces in the allied countries, the only realistic source of a sufficient number of tanks is the United States. According to Military Balance, the US Army has a stockpile of 3,700 Abrams M1A1/A2 tanks. In this case, we must consider that even after a positive decision on their supply, it will take time to remove them from the reservation. In particular, for Poland, the deadline for receiving 116 Abrams M1A1 SA under the “ring exchange” agreement – ​​as compensation for the T-72 and PT-91 provided to Ukraine – is about one year. source: https://en.defence-ua.com/news/pentagon_explained_when_ukraine_will_receive_western_abrams_and_leopard_2_tanks-4214.html #tank #tanksupply #militarynews

The US Army is looking for a company that can manufacture up to 100 HIMARS multiple launch rocket systems per year. The Army Information Request (RFI) comes as Ukraine uses the US-supplied M142 High Mobility Artillery Rocket System, or HIMARS, to deliver a devastating strike against Russian forces. What's interesting is that the Army is drawing up a five-year schedule calling for nearly 500 new HIMARS, currently under construction by Lockheed Martin. Between fiscal years 2024 and 2028, the army plans to produce at least 24 new launchers per year and no more than 96, for a total of 120 to 480 over five years. "The total for HIMARS includes all possible options," the military said. “Additional support efforts include, but are not limited to: repetitive manufacturing, obsolescence, engineering change, systems engineering and program management (SEPM), integrated logistics support (ILS), spare parts, new equipment training, and other support equipment.” The new HIMARS will actually be built depending on funding, congressional policies, and changes in the international situation and military technology. "The information provided can be used by the army in developing a procurement strategy," said Redstone Arsenal, which publishes the RFI. The addition of 480 new launchers will almost double the global shipments of HIMARS. source: https://journalbreak.com/himars-rockets-have-been-a-game-changer-in-ukraine-and-the-us-army-is-now-looking-for-ways-to-build-up-to-500-more/

Ukraine has once again made a plea to the U.S. for more air defense systems as it tries to prevent Russian forces from advancing in Donetsk, in the Donbas region of eastern Ukraine. In other news, the CIA Director William Burns appeared to pour cold water on widespread rumors that Russian President Vladimir Putin could be ill, saying there was no evidence backing up such speculation. He added that Putin was “entirely too healthy.” It comes amid questions over the scope of Russia’s aims when it comes to its invasion of Ukraine — or its “special military operation,” as it describes it — given recent comments by Russia’s Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov. Speaking to Russian state media, Lavrov said the delivery of Western weapons to Ukraine changed the dial on the geography of its “operation,” and that its aims could now extend beyond the territory of the Donbas, in eastern Ukraine. source: https://www.cnbc.com/2022/07/21/russia-ukraine-live-updates.html

Russians retreat in the east Ukrainian troops have inflicted a "major operational defeat" on Russian forces, according to the Institute for the Study of War (ISW). Russia confirmed it had withdrawn from the key towns of Izyum and Kupiansk on Saturday, saying that the retreat would allow its troops to "regroup". Both towns were major logistical hubs for Russian forces in Donbas. Russian troops had been trying to advance towards Kramatorsk and Slovyansk. Izyum in particular was one of the most fortified sections of the Russian front line. Ukraine said it had retaken more than 3,000 sq km (1,158 sq miles) from Russian forces.

Fierce fighting continued to rage in eastern Ukraine with Russian troops on the verge of sieging a major industrial city, bringing sharp rebukes from the west from Volodymyr Zelenskiy for not doing enough to help Kyiv win the war. When the Ukrainian military reported on Thursday that 40 cities in the Donbas region were under Russian bombardment, Luhansk Governor Sergiy Gaiday described the fighting outside Sievierodonetsk, a key military goal for Russia, as "very difficult", saying Russian troops were shelling the city from the outskirts. with mortar. The President of Ukraine, Volodymyr Zelenskiy, delivers a speech from Kyiv to the audience at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland. The Ukraine war was tough as an apocalyptic atmosphere enveloped Davos Read more "The coming week will be decisive," Gaiday said in a video posted on Telegram, adding that he believed Russia's goal was to "conquer the Luhansk region no matter what the cost". "There has been a large number of shootings," he added. Having failed to capture the Ukrainian capital or its second city, Kharkiv, after attacking in February, Russia is trying to take full control of the Donbas, which consists of two eastern provinces that Moscow claims in the name of the separatists. Russia has deployed thousands of troops to the region, attacking from three sides in an attempt to encircle the Ukrainian forces holding out in Sievierodonetsk and its sister, Lysychansk. Their fall would put the entire province of Luhansk under Russian control, the Kremlin's main war objective. “The robbers opened fire on more than 40 cities in the Donetsk and Luhansk regions, destroying or damaging 47 civilian sites, including 38 houses and a school. As a result of this shooting, five civilians died and 12 were injured," the joint task force of the Ukrainian armed forces said on Facebook. Gaiday said police in Lysychansk were collecting the bodies of those killed for burial in mass graves. About 150 people have been buried in a mass grave in one Lysychansk district, he added. Families of people buried in mass graves will be able to buy them back after the war, and police are issuing documents allowing Ukrainians to secure death certificates for their loved ones, Gaiday said. Zelenskiy said in a speech late Wednesday that Russian troops were "severely outnumbered" in parts of the east and echoed a plea from his foreign minister Dmytro Kuleba to the World Economic Forum in Davos for more weaponry from the west. #ukraine #russiantank #newsmilitary #newsmilitaryfuture

Russian military officials released a video showing Russian soldiers carrying out repairs to armored vehicles in the field and reintroducing them into service. The new towers can be seen being installed on the tank, as the row of towers appears to have been reused. The images showed the repaired vehicles opening fire, presumably to ensure that their long guns could still fire. The tanks can be seen being loaded into the back of the truck as the footage ends. The Russian Ministry of Defense (MoD) said on June 2: "Specialists of our repair and restoration unit are carrying out work during special military operations." "Officers carry out repairs of weapons and military equipment on the ground. In order to return equipment to service as soon as possible, specialists use the modular repair method by replacing damaged parts with serviceable ones from the repair fund, or removing from the captured equipment from the Ukrainian Armed Forces. "This repair method allows you to significantly reduce the time for assigning the wrong weapon "After recovery, the equipment returns to its formation and military units." We reached out to Russian and Ukrainian officials for comment but have not received a response at the time of writing. Russian troops invaded Ukraine on February 24 in what the Kremlin still calls a "special military operation". June 3 marks the 100th day of the campaign. From February 24 to June 2, the total combat losses of Russian troops amounted to about 30,850 personnel, according to the General Staff of the Armed Forces of Ukraine. The Ukrainian military also claimed that Russia had lost 1,363 tanks, 3,354 armored fighting vehicles, 661 artillery systems, 207 multiple launch rocket systems, 95 anti-aircraft systems, 210 combat aircraft, 175 helicopters, 2,325 motor vehicles and fuel tankers, 13 ships. , 521 unmanned aerial vehicles, 51 units of special equipment and 120 cruise missiles. Analysts say more than 70 percent of the city of Sievierodonetsk is now controlled by invading Russian forces, with almost all critical infrastructure and housing destroyed. Russia's Defense Ministry said in a statement on June 1 that the Yars mobile missile system, which can carry a nuclear warhead and which has a range of more than 10,000 kilometers (6,200 miles), is conducting "intensive maneuvering operations on combat patrol routes in the Ivanovo. Region." , east of the Russian capital, Moscow. #russianmilitary #ukraine

While Ukraine inherited many T-72s after the collapse of the Soviet Union, its army favored the T-64 and T-80, over the T-72. These tanks have faced the Russian Army's own T-72s, as well as other types, hundreds of which rolled across the border nearly six weeks ago. This isn't the first report we've seen like this, rumors of a rumored and eventually canceled transfer of the MiG-29 from Poland had made headlines early in the war. We cover the plan, its complexities, and its final destruction in some of the stories you can find. The move, if accurate, is undoubtedly an escalation in arms transfers to Ukraine. But unlike fighter jets which can only be moved with high escalation risks and unique logistical efforts, the main battle tank can cross borders intact and ready for use via train, truck, or motorized vehicle on its own. More importantly, there are far more T-72s in NATO stocks than Soviet-era fighter jets. The MiG-29 remains a frontline fighter for Poland, Bulgaria and Slovakia that will need to be replenished to keep the air force capabilities intact, which will be a huge task. However, of the NATO T-72 owners, many have been spared or actively replaced by more capable and much more modern western tanks. Some of the same players in the ill-fated MiG-29 deal also own the T-72. Bulgaria, Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland and Slovakia all operate the tanks and have some in stock. Most were Soviet export models upgraded from the standard T-72M, not quite on par with the very modern T-72B3 version used by the Russian Army. The latest Russian models feature better armor, fire control and self-protection systems than older export models. But with the abundance of media showing the destroyed Russian tank as an indicator, Ukraine is more than capable of pulling out Russian armor. How many kills were carried out tank-to-tank is unknown. The most obvious potential supplier is Poland. Its troops are equipped with nearly 400 T-72M1s by 2020 with all undergoing modernization. In addition there are more than 200 Polish PT-91 Twardy tanks. The PT-91 features an improved digital fire control system than the original T-72, as well as improved armor and explosion-reactive-armor (ERA) power generation. Some of the PT-91s were newly built while others were upgraded from the T-72M1. #russiantank