Joshstyx

...some clips expanding on the "cancelled" context behind the current Ukraine situation. A bit more on Bucha (Was it? Wasn't it?), but also contrasting it to a longer history of familiar lies to start illegal wars,,, THEY lied & millions DIED, lest we forget! Essentially, just a a mashup of stuff from other 'creators'.

www.overpopulationisamyth.com Another very good presentation,,, it's all just a trick by the ruling elitists to get us to accept our miserable lives & hate each other :-))))))

Ernst Wolff on Ukraine War escalation, COVID, the Arms Industry bonanza, orchestrated chaos & a WEF 'final solution',,,,, with Putin & Xi both playing their part for "the Club".

....when Ukrainians were being terrorised, bombed & murdered by their own government for 8 years. 2 clips from the hauntingly brilliant documentary by Anne-Laure Bonnet (filmed in 2016). "Donbass" (53m) https://rumble.com/vx9w2h-donbass-2016-anne-laure-bonnel.html

...playing on a sunny afternoon. 2015 Korinthos, Greece. Music: "dragonfly" - Ziggy Marley Just fancied uploading something a little less "The End is Nigh" for a change :-)

Another illuminating analysis of the Ukraine conflict. Clips from the Aaron Maté interview with Jacques Baud, Fmr Strategic Intelligence Officer with the Swiss Intelligence Service, who also served with NATO, the UN & the Swiss Military. Taken from a longer 40 minute interview: US, EU sacrificing Ukraine to ‘weaken Russia’ April 15, 2022 https://thegrayzone.com/2022/04/15/us-eu-sacrificing-ukraine-to-weaken-russia-fmr-nato-adviser/ https://thegrayzone.com/pushback/

Tony Benn's 1998 speech in the British House of Commons on the motion to bomb Iraq. Here is the full speech: 17 Feb 1998 5.26 pm Mr. Tony Benn (Chesterfield): If this debate is to make sense, we should understand the area of total agreement and where differences of opinion exist. First, no one in the House supports the regime of Saddam Hussein, who is a brutal dictator. I shall come to the support he has had from the west, but he is a brutal dictator and nobody in the House defends him. Secondly, no one in the House can defend for one moment the denial by the Iraqi Government of the implementation of the Security Council resolution which said that there should be inspections. The third issue on which there is major agreement, but little understanding yet, is the sudden realisation of the horror of modern chemical and biological weapons, which do not depend on enormous amounts of hardware--previously only available to a super-power--but which almost anybody, perhaps even a terrorist group, could deliver. The disagreement is on how we deal with the matter. The former Prime Minister, the right hon. Member for Huntingdon (Mr. Major)--whose speech was listened to with great attention--was talking about a preventive war. I shall read Hansard carefully, but he talked about a preventive war. There is no provision in the UN charter for a preventive war. If we are realistic--we must not fool ourselves--that huge American fleet of 30 ships and 1,000 aircraft is not in the Gulf waiting to be withdrawn when Saddam makes a friendly noise to Kofi Annan. The fleet has been sent there to be used, and the House would be deceiving itself if it thought that any so-called "diplomatic initiatives" would avert its use. 17 Feb 1998 : Column 925 This is a unique debate as far as I am concerned. I have sat here with the right hon. Member for Old Bexley and Sidcup (Sir E. Heath) through four wars--the Korean war, the Suez war, the Falklands war and the first Gulf war. I cannot remember an occasion when any Government asked the House to authorise, in a resolution, action which could lead to force. Mr. Donald Anderson (Swansea, East): Will my right hon. Friend give way? Mr. Benn: No. If my hon. Friend will forgive me, I want to develop a case briefly. The reason is that the right to go to war is a prerogative power. The Government are inviting the House--I understand why--to share their responsibility for the use of force, knowing that force will be used within a week or two. We are not starting afresh. I opposed the Gulf war. We should have asked why Saddam got into Kuwait and why he was not stopped. We had the war. The equivalent of seven and a half Hiroshima bombs was dropped on the people of Iraq--the biggest bombardment since the second world war. Some 200,000 Iraqis died. Depleted uranium bullets were used. I have had two or three letters from Gulf war veterans in a mass of correspondence in the past week, one of whom has offered to be a human shield in Iraq because he feels that he was betrayed by the British Government and does not want the Iraqi people to suffer again. All the evidence confirms my view that sanctions are another instrument of mass destruction. They destroy people's lives, denying them the food and medicines that they need. It is no good saying that Saddam took the money for his palaces. If that is the case, why does the United Nations Children's Fund now say that there are 1 million children in Iraq starving, along with 500,000 who have died? Bombing the water supply and the sewerage plants is like using chemical weapons, because the disease that spreads from that bombing contributes to disease in the country. And, at the end of all that, Saddam is stronger than he was at the beginning. Nobody denies that. People ask why we have to go back seven years later. It is because the previous policy inevitably made him stronger. We know that when a country is attacked, leaders wave their fists and say, "We will never give way." It happened in Britain, it happens when we are dealing with bombings from Ireland--it happens all the time. Are we such fools that we think that if we bomb other people they will crumble, whereas when they bomb us it will stiffen our resolve? The House ought to study its own history. The Government's motion would not be carried at the Security Council. I asked the Foreign Secretary about that. Why is he asking us to pass a resolution that he could not get through the Security Council? On the basis of his speech, the Russians and the Chinese would not vote for the use of force. Why involve the House of Commons in an act that runs counter to what the Security Council would accept? Several hon. Members rose-- Mr. Benn: I have very little time. I want to develop my argument. There are many others who want to speak. 17 Feb 1998 : Column 926 I hope that the House will listen to me. I know that my view is not the majority view in the House, although it may be outside this place. I regret that I shall vote against the Government motion. The first victims of the bombing that I believe will be launched within a fortnight will be innocent people, many, if not most, of whom would like Saddam to be removed. The former Prime Minister, the right hon. Member for Huntingdon, talked about collateral damage. The military men are clever. They talk not about hydrogen bombs but about deterrence. They talk not about people but about collateral damage. They talk not about power stations and sewerage plants but about assets. The reality is that innocent people will be killed if the House votes tonight--as it manifestly will--to give the Government the authority for military action. The bombing would also breach the United Nations charter. I do not want to argue on legal terms. If the hon. and learned Member for North-East Fife (Mr. Campbell) has read articles 41 and 42, he will know that the charter says that military action can only be decided on by the Security Council and conducted under the military staffs committee. That procedure has not been followed and cannot be followed because the five permanent members have to agree. Even for the Korean war, the United States had to go to the General Assembly to get authority because Russia was absent. That was held to be a breach, but at least an overwhelming majority was obtained. Has there been any negotiation or diplomatic effort? Why has the Foreign Secretary not been in Baghdad, like the French Foreign Minister, the Turkish Foreign Minister and the Russian Foreign Minister? The time that the Government said that they wanted for negotiation has been used to prepare public opinion for war and to build up their military position in the Gulf. Saddam will be strengthened again. Or he may be killed. I read today that the security forces--who are described as terrorists in other countries--have tried to kill Saddam. I should not be surprised if they succeeded. This second action does not enjoy support from elsewhere. There is no support from Iraq's neighbours. If what the Foreign Secretary says about the threat to the neighbours is true, why is Iran against, why is Jordan against, why is Saudi Arabia against, why is Turkey against? Where is that great support? There is no support from the opposition groups inside Iraq. The Kurds, the Shi'ites and the communists hate Saddam, but they do not want the bombing. The Pope is against it, along with 10 bishops, two cardinals, Boutros Boutros-Ghali and Perez de Cuellar. The Foreign Secretary clothes himself with the garment of the world community, but he does not have that support. We are talking about an Anglo-American preventive war. It has been planned and we are asked to authorise it in advance. The House is clear about its view of history, but it does not say much about the history of the areas with which we are dealing. The borders of Kuwait and Iraq, which then became sacrosanct, were drawn by the British after the end of the Ottoman empire. We used chemical weapons against the Iraqis in the 1930s. Air Chief Marshal Harris, who later flattened Dresden, was instructed to drop chemical weapons. When Saddam came to power, he was a hero of the west. The Americans used him against Iran because they hated Khomeini, who was then the figure to be removed. 17 Feb 1998 : Column 927 They armed Saddam, used him and sent him anthrax. I am not anxious to make a party political point, because there is not much difference between the two sides on this, but, as the Scott report revealed, the previous Government allowed him to be armed. I had three hours with Saddam in 1990. I got the hostages out, which made it worth going. He felt betrayed by the United States, because the American ambassador in Baghdad had said to him, "If you go into Kuwait, we will treat it as an Arab matter." That is part of the history that they know, even if we do not know it here. In 1958, 40 years ago, Selwyn Lloyd, the Foreign Secretary and later the Speaker, told Foster Dulles that Britain would make Kuwait a Crown colony. Foster Dulles said, "What a very good idea." We may not know that history, but in the middle east it is known. The Conservatives have tabled an amendment asking about the objectives. That is an important issue. There is no UN resolution saying that Saddam must be toppled.It is not clear that the Government know what their objectives are. They will probably be told from Washington. Do they imagine that if we bomb Saddam for two weeks, he will say, "Oh, by the way, do come in and inspect"? The plan is misconceived. Some hon. Members--even Opposition Members--have pointed out the double standard. I am not trying to equate Israel with Iraq, but on 8 June 1981, Israel bombed a nuclear reactor near Baghdad. What action did either party take on that? Israel is in breach of UN resolutions and has instruments of mass destruction. Mordecai Vanunu would not boast about Israeli freedom. Turkey breached UN resolutions by going into northern Cyprus. It has also recently invaded northern Iraq and has instruments of mass destruction. Lawyers should know better than anyone else that it does not matter whether we are dealing with a criminal thug or an ordinary lawbreaker--if the law is to apply, it must apply to all. Governments of both major parties have failed in that. Prediction is difficult and dangerous, but I fear that the situation could end in a tragedy for the American and British Governments. Suez and Vietnam are not far from the minds of anyone with a sense of history. I recall what happened to Sir Anthony Eden. I heard him announce the ceasefire and saw him go on holiday to Goldeneye in Jamaica. He came back to be replaced. I am not saying that that will happen in this case, but does anyone think that the House is in a position to piggy-back on American power in the middle east? What happens if Iraq breaks up? If the Kurds are free, they will demand Kurdistan and destabilise Turkey. Anything could happen. We are sitting here as if we still had an empire--only, fortunately, we have a bigger brother with more weapons than us. The British Government have everything at their disposal. They are permanent members of the Security Council and have the European Union presidency for six months. Where is that leadership in Europe which we were promised? It just disappeared. We are also, of course, members of the Commonwealth, in which there are great anxieties. We have thrown away our influence, which could have been used for moderation. The amendment that I and others have tabled argues that the United Nations Security Council should decide the nature of what Kofi Annan brings back from Baghdad and whether force is to be used. Inspections and sanctions go side by side. As I said, sanctions are brutal for innocent 17 Feb 1998 : Column 928 people. Then there is the real question: when will the world come to terms with the fact that chemical weapons are available to anybody? If there is an answer to that, it must involve the most meticulous observation of international law, which I feel we are abandoning. War is easy to talk about; there are not many people left of the generation which remembers it. The right hon. Member for Old Bexley and Sidcup served with distinction in the last war. I never killed anyone but I wore uniform. I was in London during the blitz in 1940, living where the Millbank tower now stands, where I was born. Some different ideas have come in there since. Every night, I went to the shelter in Thames house. Every morning, I saw docklands burning. Five hundred people were killed in Westminster one night by a land mine. It was terrifying. Are not Arabs and Iraqis terrified? Do not Arab and Iraqi women weep when their children die? Does not bombing strengthen their determination? What fools we are to live as if war is a computer game for our children or just an interesting little Channel 4 news item. Every Member of Parliament who votes for the Government motion will be consciously and deliberately accepting responsibility for the deaths of innocent people if the war begins, as I fear it will. That decision isfor every hon. Member to take. In my parliamentary experience, this a unique debate. We are being asked to share responsibility for a decision that we will not really be taking but which will have consequences for people who have no part to play in the brutality of the regime with which we are dealing. On 24 October 1945--the right hon. Member for Old Bexley and Sidcup will remember--the United Nations charter was passed. The words of that charter are etched on my mind and move me even as I think of them. It says: "We the peoples of the United Nations determined to save succeeding generations from the scourge of war, which twice in our life-time has brought untold sorrow to mankind". That was that generation's pledge to this generation, and it would be the greatest betrayal of all if we voted to abandon the charter, take unilateral action and pretend that we were doing so in the name of the international community. I shall vote against the motion for the reasons that I have given. https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm199798/cmhansrd/vo980217/debtext/80217-14.htm

SaferToWait.com Think carefully before jabbing your kids

How jab fans suffocate their own young. Technically, this is a child abuse video, but in a "World Turn'd Upside Down" we're meant to believe that this is perfectly acceptable, the New (jAB)Normal... :-(

THE SEQUEL TO THE FALL OF THE CABAL - PART 20 https://www.bitchute.com/video/Ir5Z8PVzoudo/ Part 3 of multiple episodes about the biggest medical scam of all times. About Face Masks, Social Distancing, and much more... By Janet Ossebaard & Cyntha Koeter Music: Alexander Nakarada, Gothic Storm, Foxwinter, Mortifer V., AShamaluev, T. Mutiu, Zakhar Valaha. www.bitchute.com/channel/fallcabal/ If you liked this content, please consider supporting the creators: www.fallcabal.com/ https://t.me/Fall_of_the_Cabal

The untold truth about nose swabs THE SEQUEL TO THE FALL OF THE CABAL - PART 21 www.bitchute.com/video/wKBBGATV3jyg/ Part 4 of multiple episodes about the biggest medical scam of all times. About nose swabs and PCR By Janet Ossebaard & Cyntha Koeter Music: Alexander Nakarada www.bitchute.com/channel/fallcabal/ If you liked this content, please consider supporting the creators: www.fallcabal.com/ https://t.me/Fall_of_the_Cabal

THE SEQUEL TO THE FALL OF THE CABAL - PART 22 www.bitchute.com/video/pOk5Z7bEPrB2/ Part 5 of multiple episodes about the biggest medical scam of all times. About MONEY & MURDER IN HOSPITALS... By Janet Ossebaard & Cyntha Koeter Music: Alexander Nakarada www.bitchute.com/channel/fallcabal/ If you liked this content, please consider supporting the creators: www.fallcabal.com/ https://t.me/Fall_of_the_Cabal

https://defeatthemandatesus.com/

A short clip from 2016, with Daszak talking about bats, China, SARS & making "killer" viruses. Plus a longer interview from May 2020, where Daszak is perhaps a little more candid than usual, talking about virology like a Wall Street wanker. "Pandemics" Sonia Shah moderated a forum on emerging infectious diseases and the next pandemic. 23rd February 2016 While describing how his organization sequences deadly viruses, Daszak describes the process of “inserting spike proteins” into viruses to see if they can “bind to human cells” as being carried out by his “colleagues in China”: “Then when you get a sequence of a virus, and it looks like a relative of a known nasty pathogen, just like we did with SARS. We found other coronaviruses in bats, a whole host of them, some of them looked very similar to SARS. So we sequenced the spike protein: the protein that attaches to cells. Then we… Well I didn’t do this work, but my colleagues in China did the work. You create pseudo particles, you insert the spike proteins from those viruses, see if they bind to human cells. At each step of this you move closer and closer to this virus could really become pathogenic in people. “You end up with a small number of viruses that really do look like killers,” he adds. (1 hr 35mins) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AksKoMZon6Y https://www.c-span.org/video/?404875-1/pandemics TWiV 615 Vincent (This Week in Virology) speaks with Peter Daszak, President of EcoHealth Alliance, a global nonprofit organization dedicated to protecting wildlife and public health from the emergence of disease...... and making money. 19th May, 2020 https://www.microbe.tv/twiv/twiv-615/ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IdYDL_RK--w Daszaks' daddy was from Ukraine?....hmmmmmmm, can't help but wonder what side of the "ultra fascist" fence his family stood in the 1940s??

A look at the dissemination of fakery wrt Ukraine. A compilation of clips & material from other creators who I've been too lazy to list,,, sorry!,,,, & thank you to them that does all the hard work :-))))

"...with CBDC, Central Bank will have absolute control on the rules & regulations which will determine the use of that [money] and also, we will have the technology to enforce that." Agustin Carstens, Bank of International Settlements Manager, October 18, 2020.

Clip from: The Coming Big Freeze (51mins) Jim Rickards, The Daily Reckoning Road to Ruin Nov 17, 2017 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qA-ietqepWA

XPosted from creator: https://www.youtube.com/user/Demonocracyinfo

$16 trillion was the US National Debt in 2012,,, 10 years later, that debt has now doubled. XPosted from: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qSHI9PDh6GM

XPosted from: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aKrFFFpYgkU

Blackrock has a secret weapon that has made it the most powerful company on the planet - "Aladdin". This is the story of how Blackrock's AI programme took over Wall Street,,,,, & the world! XPosted from pooTube: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AWBRldjVzuM Related article: Aladdin - The AI That Owns the World https://pureelement5.com/aladdin-the-ai-that-owns-the-world/

Iain Davis lays out how "sustainability" & "carbon reduction" is just fraudulent PR to enable the establishment of totalitarian global governance. Iain Davis - COP 26 Presentation. In conversation with Whitney Webb & Cory Morningstar 11th November 2021. XPosted from: https://odysee.com/@InThisTogether:d/Seizing-The-Global-Commons:8 We all have the responsibility for stewardship of Mother Earth, but we've allowed it to be stolen from us by a tiny Ruling Minority, a self appointed "Wise" class who merely seek to extract & exploit as much profit as they can from the earth whilst implementing a eugenics policy of depopulation for the rest of humanity. COVID proved to be the perfect crisis behind which to advance their vile agenda unopposed. Further reading: https://in-this-together.com/global-commons-part-1/ https://in-this-together.com/global-commons-part-2/ All these Diggers have a stack of brilliantly illuminating & fastidiously researched articles 'under their belt', here are just a handful: Part 1: "How the Unthinkable Became Thinkable: Eric Lander, Julian Huxley and the Awakening of Sleeping Monsters" Matthew Ehret https://matthewehret.substack.com/p/how-the-unthinkable-became-thinkable "UN-Backed Banker Alliance Announces “Green” Plan to Transform the Global Financial System" Whitney Webb https://unlimitedhangout.com/2021/11/investigative-reports/un-backed-banker-alliance-announces-green-plan-to-transform-the-global-financial-system/ "The Great Reset: How a ‘Managerial Revolution’ Was Plotted 80 Years Ago by a Trotskyist-turned-CIA Neocon" Cynthia Chung https://cynthiachung.substack.com/p/the-great-reset-how-a-managerial "The Pilgrims Society: A study of the Anglo-American Establishment" Joël van der Reijden https://isgp-studies.com/pilgrims-society-us-uk In 1946, Huxley noted in his vision for UNESCO that: "...it will be important for UNESCO to see that the eugenic problem is examined with the greatest care and that the public mind is informed of the issues at stake so that much that is now unthinkable may at least become thinkable.” Paul Ehrlich & John Holdren produced the manual "Ecoscience" in 1977, where the pair wrote: "Perhaps those agencies, combined with UNEP and the United Nations population agencies, might eventually be developed into a Planetary Regime- sort of an international superagency for population, resources, and environment. Such a comprehensive Planetary Regime could control the development, administration, conservation, and distribution of all-natural resources, renewable or non-renewable,,, "The Planetary Regime might be given responsibility for determining the optimum population for the world and for each region and for arbitrating various countries’ shares within their regional limits.... the Regime would have some power to enforce the agreed limits.” In 1991, Club of Rome co-founder Sir Alexander King stated in the “The First Global Revolution” (an assessment of the first 30 years of the Club of Rome) that: “In searching for a common enemy against whom we can unite, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like, would fit the bill. In their totality and their interactions these phenomena do constitute a common threat which must be confronted by everyone together. "The real enemy then is humanity itself.” Kissinger’s infamous NSSM-200 report, "Implications of Worldwide Population Growth for US Security and Overseas Interests", otherwise known as “The Kissinger Report” published in 1974, states: “… if future numbers are to be kept within reasonable bounds, it is urgent that measures to reduce fertility be started and made effective in the 1970s and 1980s ... Allocation of scarce resources should take account of what steps a country is taking in population control … There is an alternative view that mandatory programs may be needed ..” In Thomas Malthus’ “Essay on the Principle of Population” (1799), he wrote: “We should facilitate, instead of foolishly and vainly endeavoring to impede, the operations of nature in producing this mortality; and if we dread the too frequent visitation of the horrid form of famine, we should sedulously encourage the other forms of destruction, which we compel nature to use. In our towns we should make the streets narrower, crowd more people into the houses, and court the return of the plague.” In 1941, Burnham (who went on to the OSS & CIA) would publish “The Managerial Revolution: What is Happening in the World”. In it he states: “Effective class domination and privilege does, it is true, require control over the instruments of production; but this need not be exercised through individual private property rights. It can be done through what might be called corporate rights, possessed not by individuals as such but by institutions: as was the case conspicuously with many societies in which a priestly class was dominant... “If, in a managerial society, no individuals are to hold comparable property rights, how can any group of individuals constitute a ruling class? The answer is comparatively simple and, as already noted, not without historical analogues. The managers will exercise their control over the instruments of production and gain preference in the distribution of the products, not directly, through property rights vested in them as individuals, but indirectly, through their control of the state which in turn will own and control the instruments of production." Jonas Salk wrote, in his 1973 book "Survival of the Wisest", that: "Eventually, the struggle in the human domain will be between the wise and the nonwise." (pg71)

Cynthia Chung shreds the elitist fraud of "limits to growth" & paints a picture of a wonderous future for humanity: "What Determines a Limit to Growth" https://risingtidefoundation.net/2022/02/22/what-determines-a-limit-to-growth/ A talk with Reiner Fuellmich & Viviane Fischer of the German Corona Investigative Committee: Session 85 - "Rethinking" January 1st 2022 https://odysee.com/@Corona-Investigative-Committee:5/cynthia-Session-85-en.mp4:6

"A Good Death?" - Jacqui Deevoy, Ickonic Original Film (2021) "In a new and original film from Ickonic Media, we hear the heartbreaking stories from people who lost loved ones to fatal doses of morphine and Midazolam. Each year, tens of thousands of elderly and terminally ill patients are quietly euthanised in NHS facilities. In hospitals, care homes and hospices, behind closed doors, their deaths are hastened in what appears to be a caring and humane way. But how has this practice of euthanasia – illegal in the UK and carrying a life prison sentence - become so widespread and acceptable? And why are people who are nowhere near the end of their lives being given killer ‘cocktails’ of drugs that are used in many US states for executions?" https://www.ickonic.com/Dashboard/Watch/1163 5th December 2021

“The pharmaceutical industry is manufacturing all these medical journal articles, behind the scenes, for marketing purposes.” Leemon McHenry PhD is a bioethicist and Emeritus Professor of Philosophy at California State University, Northridge, in the United States. XPosted from: Perspectives on the Pandemic, Episode 13 https://off-guardian.org/2021/04/20/watch-perspectives-on-the-pandemic-13/