Seizing The Global Commons, 'Green Agenda' is NWO

2 years ago
291

Iain Davis lays out how "sustainability" & "carbon reduction" is just fraudulent PR to enable the establishment of totalitarian global governance.

Iain Davis - COP 26 Presentation.
In conversation with Whitney Webb & Cory Morningstar 11th November 2021.

XPosted from:
https://odysee.com/@InThisTogether:d/Seizing-The-Global-Commons:8

We all have the responsibility for stewardship of Mother Earth, but we've allowed it to be stolen from us by a tiny Ruling Minority, a self appointed "Wise" class who merely seek to extract & exploit as much profit as they can from the earth whilst implementing a eugenics policy of depopulation for the rest of humanity.

COVID proved to be the perfect crisis behind which to advance their vile agenda unopposed.

Further reading:

https://in-this-together.com/global-commons-part-1/

https://in-this-together.com/global-commons-part-2/

All these Diggers have a stack of brilliantly illuminating & fastidiously researched articles 'under their belt', here are just a handful:

Part 1: "How the Unthinkable Became Thinkable: Eric Lander, Julian Huxley and the Awakening of Sleeping Monsters"
Matthew Ehret

https://matthewehret.substack.com/p/how-the-unthinkable-became-thinkable

"UN-Backed Banker Alliance Announces “Green” Plan to Transform the Global Financial System"
Whitney Webb

https://unlimitedhangout.com/2021/11/investigative-reports/un-backed-banker-alliance-announces-green-plan-to-transform-the-global-financial-system/

"The Great Reset: How a ‘Managerial Revolution’ Was Plotted 80 Years Ago by a Trotskyist-turned-CIA Neocon"
Cynthia Chung

https://cynthiachung.substack.com/p/the-great-reset-how-a-managerial

"The Pilgrims Society: A study of the Anglo-American Establishment"
Joël van der Reijden

https://isgp-studies.com/pilgrims-society-us-uk

In 1946, Huxley noted in his vision for UNESCO that:

"...it will be important for UNESCO to see that the eugenic problem is examined with the greatest care and that the public mind is informed of the issues at stake so that much that is now unthinkable may at least become thinkable.”

Paul Ehrlich & John Holdren produced the manual "Ecoscience" in 1977, where the pair wrote:

"Perhaps those agencies, combined with UNEP and the United Nations population agencies, might eventually be developed into a Planetary Regime- sort of an international superagency for population, resources, and environment. Such a comprehensive Planetary Regime could control the development, administration, conservation, and distribution of all-natural resources, renewable or non-renewable,,,
"The Planetary Regime might be given responsibility for determining the optimum population for the world and for each region and for arbitrating various countries’ shares within their regional limits.... the Regime would have some power to enforce the agreed limits.”

In 1991, Club of Rome co-founder Sir Alexander King stated in the “The First Global Revolution” (an assessment of the first 30 years of the Club of Rome) that:

“In searching for a common enemy against whom we can unite, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like, would fit the bill. In their totality and their interactions these phenomena do constitute a common threat which must be confronted by everyone together.
"The real enemy then is humanity itself.”

Kissinger’s infamous NSSM-200 report, "Implications of Worldwide Population Growth for US Security and Overseas Interests", otherwise known as “The Kissinger Report” published in 1974, states:

“… if future numbers are to be kept within reasonable bounds, it is urgent that measures to reduce fertility be started and made effective in the 1970s and 1980s ... Allocation of scarce resources should take account of what steps a country is taking in population control … There is an alternative view that mandatory programs may be needed ..”

In Thomas Malthus’ “Essay on the Principle of Population” (1799), he wrote:

“We should facilitate, instead of foolishly and vainly endeavoring to impede, the operations of nature in producing this mortality; and if we dread the too frequent visitation of the horrid form of famine, we should sedulously encourage the other forms of destruction, which we compel nature to use. In our towns we should make the streets narrower, crowd more people into the houses, and court the return of the plague.”

In 1941, Burnham (who went on to the OSS & CIA) would publish “The Managerial Revolution: What is Happening in the World”. In it he states:
“Effective class domination and privilege does, it is true, require control over the instruments of production; but this need not be exercised through individual private property rights. It can be done through what might be called corporate rights, possessed not by individuals as such but by institutions: as was the case conspicuously with many societies in which a priestly class was dominant...
“If, in a managerial society, no individuals are to hold comparable property rights, how can any group of individuals constitute a ruling class? The answer is comparatively simple and, as already noted, not without historical analogues. The managers will exercise their control over the instruments of production and gain preference in the distribution of the products, not directly, through property rights vested in them as individuals, but indirectly, through their control of the state which in turn will own and control the instruments of production."

Jonas Salk wrote, in his 1973 book "Survival of the Wisest", that:
"Eventually, the struggle in the human domain will be between the wise and the nonwise." (pg71)

Loading comments...