Informationwarfarenews

HISTORY OF NESARA The National Economic Security and Reformation Act Compiled by Nancy Detweiler, M.Ed., M.Div. Information is added as it becomes known, along with the date it is included. NOTE: Writing a history of NESARA requires locating the separate dots and attempting to put them together to create truth. The original documents are sequestered, and those individuals directly involved are still under a strict gag order. I have used as my foundation a history written by James Rink. My research set out to prove NESARA by locating original documents and articles written by reputable people that illustrated each of the tenets. I have inserted some of these URLs for these tenets into Rink’s history. In my 7+ years of research, I have found nothing to disprove the existence of the NESARA LAW. The internet is loaded with disinformation that can be easily dismissed by research. As you read this history, you will find mention of high officials being cloned. The capacity to clone an adult individual is just one of the many secrets withheld from the public. As “all that is hidden is revealed,” this fact will be confirmed. The cloning of an adult individual is used for various reasons by those working behind the scenes. One example will become known at the divine right moment: the cloning of Princess Diane to avoid her death. Another example is to clone a public figure to prevent public reaction to his or her being removed from their position, as occurred with Janet Reno (info. added 2014) Now that information regarding the government/military cover-up of the extraterrestrial presence is in the public domain, we can see parallels between the facets regarding NESARA that many have used to discredit it. Some of these are: deliberate cover-up of information; government or military gag orders; the suspicious deaths of persons who attempted to tell the truth; control of the media; and the ruining of individual lives and professions. I encourage all to do their own research and add to the pool of documented evidence on the truth of NESARA. Now is the perfect time for NESARA to be released to the world! NESARA Demonstration in front of the Peace Palace, the Hague, Netherlands 1892: Bankers adopted their Bankers’ Manifesto of 1892, in which it was declared: “We [the bankers] must proceed with caution and guard every move made, for the lower order of people are already showing signs of restless commotion. Prudence will therefore show a policy of apparently yielding to the popular will until our plans are so consummated that we can declare our designs without fear of any organized resistance. The Farmers Alliance and Knights of Labor organizations in the United States should be carefully watched by our trusted men, and we must take immediate steps to control these organizations in our interest or disrupt them. The courts must be called to our aid, debts must be collected, and bonds and mortgages must be foreclosed as rapidly as possible. When, through the process of the law, the common people have lost their homes, they will be more tractable and easily governed through the influence of the strong arm of the government applied to a central power of imperial wealth under the control of the leading financiers. People without homes will not quarrel with their leaders.” 1907–1917: In order to warn Americans, the 1892 Bankers’ Manifesto was revealed by US Congressman Charles A. Lindbergh, Sr., from Minnesota, before the US Congress sometime during his term of office between the years of 1907 and 1917. 1910: John E. DiNardo, professor of public policy and economics at the University of Michigan, writes in his article “The Federal Reserve Act”: "On the night of November 22, 1910, a small group of surrogates of the most powerful bankers of the world met... under the veil of utmost secrecy. Over the next few weeks, these men would perpetrate, under the orders of their masters, perhaps the most colossal and devastating fraud ever inflicted upon the American people. This ultra-secret fraud is known as the Federal Reserve Act of 1913. The Federal Reserve Act of 1913 concocted legislation to be foisted upon the People’s Congress of the United States that empowered and commissioned this secret cabal of world-dominant bankers to print United States currency, a usurpation of our Constitution’s explicit edict empowering only the United States government to print and coin currency. This world banking empire used their stolen power to print, out of thin air, paper currency, which in no way represents the gold and silver reserves that authentic currency is supposed to represent.” 1913: The Federal Reserve Act of 1913 The complete text of Act may seen at: http://www.federalreserve.gov/aboutthefed/fract.htm 1933–1934: Prior to 1933, Federal Reserve Notes were backed by gold. This changed with the new law: Congressional Record, March 9, 1933, on HR 1491, p. 83.“Under the new law, money is issued to the banks in return for government obligations, bills of exchange, drafts, notes, trade acceptances, and banker acceptances. The money will be worth 100 cents on the dollar because it is backed by the credit of the nation. It will represent a mortgage on all the homes and other property of all the people of the nation.” The Bankers’ Manifesto ties in with U.S. Senate Document No. 43, 73rd Congress, 1st Session (1934), which states: “The ultimate ownership of all property is in the state; individual so-called ‘ownership’ is only by virtue of government, i.e., law, amounting to mere ‘user’ and use must be in acceptance with law and subordinate to the necessities of the state.” 1970s: The Federal Land Bank illegally foreclosed on farmers mortgages all throughout the Midwest. In each of these cases, the farmers were defrauded by the banks with the approval of the Federal Reserve System. These court cases would eventually become known as the Farmer Claims Program. 1978: An elderly ranch farmer in Colorado purchased a farm on loan from the Federal Land Bank. After he died, the property was passed on to his son, Roy Schwasinger, Jr., who was a retired military general. Soon after, a Federal Land Bank officer and Federal Marshall appeared on his property and informed him the bank was foreclosing on his farm, ordering him to vacate within 30 days. Without his knowledge, his deceased father had signed a stipulation that reverted the property back to the Federal Land Bank in the event of the borrower’s death. Outraged, Roy E. Schwasinger, Jr. filed a class action lawsuit in the Denver Federal Court system. The suit was dismissed on the basis of an incorrect filing. This prompted Roy Schwasinger’s investigation into the inner workings of the banking system. 1982: Roy Schwasinger was given a contract by the US Senate and later the Supreme Court to investigate banking fraud. But because he was under a strict non-disclosure order, he was not allowed to tell the media what he discovered. In the late 1980s, he began sharing his knowledge with others, including high-ranking military personnel who helped him bring about a class action lawsuit against the federal government. The first series of these lawsuits began in the mid-1980s, when William and Shirley Baskerville of Fort Collins, Colorado, were involved in a bankruptcy case with First Interstate Bank of Fort Collins, which was trying to foreclose on their farm. At a restaurant, their lawyer informed them that he would no longer be able to help them and walked off. Overhearing the conversation, Roy Schwasinger offered his advice on how to appeal the case in bankruptcy court. So in 1987, they filed an appeal (Case No. 87-C-716) with the United States District Court in Colorado. 1988: On November 3, 1988, the Denver Federal Court system ruled that indeed the banks had defrauded the Baskervilles and proceeded to reverse its bankruptcy decision. But when the foreclosed property was not returned, they filed a new lawsuit. Eventually, 23 other farmers, ranchers, and Indians swindled by the banks in the same manner would join in the case. In these cases, the banks were foreclosing on the properties using fraudulent methods such as charging exorbitant interest, illegal foreclosure, or not crediting mortgage payments to their account as they should have but instead would steal the mortgage payments for themselves, triggering foreclosure on the property. After running out of money, they continued their fight without the help of lawyers. With some assistance from the Farmers Union, a new lawsuit was filed against the Federal Land Bank and the Farmers Credit System. Case No. 92-C-1781 The District Court ruled in their favor and ordered the banks to return the stolen properties with help from either the Federal Marshals or the National Guard. But when no payments were made, the farmers declared involuntary Chapter Seven bankruptcy against the Federal Land Bank and the Farmers Credit System. The banks appealed their case, insisting they were not a business but a federal agency, therefore they were not liable to pay the damages. So the farmer’s legal team adopted a new strategy. According to the Federal Land Bank’s 1933 charter, they are not allowed to make loans directly to applicants but instead could only back loans as a guarantor in case of default. Because the Federal Land Bank had violated this rule, the farmer’s legal team was able to successfully sue the bank for damages. Word of the lawsuit began to spread; the legal team would teach others how to fight foreclosure and to help them file lawsuits as well (Case No. 93-1308-M). Celebrities such as Willie Nelson joined in the cause and helped raise money during his “Farm Aid” concerts. The Baskerville case has now become the Farmer Claims Class Action Lawsuit.Worried about the legal ramifications, the government retaliated against the farmers by hitting them with either outrageous IRS fees or by imprisoning the legal team under frivolous nonrelated charges. When the farmers realized they were being unfairly targeted, they had military generals such as General Roy Schwasinger sit in the courtroom to make sure the bribed judges would vote according to constitutional law. The farmers, now with a large team of knowledgeable people of the law behind them, filed a new case to claim additional damages from the fraudulent loaning activities of the Farmers Credit System. The government tried to settle, but they had already lost many cases and were now losing appeals as well. More and more evidence was collected. According to the National Banking Act, all banks are required to register their charters with the Federal and State Bureaus of Records, but none of the banks complied, allowing the legal team to sue the Farmers Credit System. Not only was Farmers Credit System not chartered to do business with the American Banking Association, but so were other quasi-government organizations such as the Federal Housing Administration, the Department of Housing and Urban Development, and even the Federal Reserve Bank. The Farmers Claims lawsuit was thrown out of court at each level, with the records purposely destroyed. An example of these court cases may be viewed at: http://openjurist.org/25/f3d/1055/baskerville-jb-v-federal-land-bank-na 1990s: In the early 1990s, Roy Schwasinger brought the case before the United States Supreme Court. Some of the content of this case is sealed from public view, but most of it can be viewed today. The U.S. Supreme Court Justices ruled that the Farmers Union claims were indeed valid; therefore, all property foreclosed by the Farmers Credit System was illegal, and all those who were foreclosed on would have to receive damages. In addition, they ruled that the U.S. federal government and banks had defrauded the farmers and all U.S. citizens out of vast sums of money and property. Furthermore, the court ruled that the IRS was a Puerto Rican trust. Read more at: http://www.supremelaw.org/sls/31answers.htm In addition, the court ruled that the Federal Reserve was unlawful.